Going through my private playlist and found this video. Have to say that this video pushed me to make the decision of buying a 2021 CX-5. It's almost 3 years from now and I'm still satisfied with it.
No way, I wouldn't want open-pore wood, this type of wood in the CX-5 is known as 'sen wood', which is meant to be subtle and not to stand out on its own but to accentuate the rest of the cabin. It's a Japanese wood, for a car designed by a Japanese company, that is still made in Japan. As a side note, your channel is one of the few where you actually take the time and effort to give a proper presentation on the car. You don't stumble on words, you don't rush them out just to fill the silence, and all of it sounds like it was written well ahead of time and rehearsed before going on camera. We really appreciate the effort you put on all your videos!
I love Mazda too but I prefer Toyota because of its guaranteed reliability. I know Mazda has been pretty good but Toyota is a no risk purchase. I also feel that Toyota’s interior is just right
@@huskydinosaur2860: I hope you're right about the 2020 Ford Escape because Consumer Reports has proved through much testing thousands of customer reviews that that mode (style) vehicle has been rated very low for reliability and customer satisfaction in past years. I refuse to buy any Ford vehicles where I live because they have all been substandard, and our dealership's customer service is horrible and dishonest. I was once a big supporter of Ford cars, SUV's and trucks, but no longer.
@@rogersmoot6194 Consumer Reports said the Escape was "impressive" and overall recommended, with their only major gripe being safety features that were only available on the titanium model and need to be standard on all trims. Why do people make up stuff in youtube comment section all the time... sigh.
How is Mazda reliability? My mother is looking for a smaller SUV and hates "those 4 cylinders" because she thinks anything not a V6 is slow. I've been pushing for her to get one of these as it'll have the V6 grunt and she loves wood trim, but the Kia Sportage has a much longer warranty. I told her it won't be an issue as her current vehicle only has 50k miles on it so she doesn't put huge miles on her vehicles. Most miles she has had on a car is like 80k over 10 years. Powertrain is the biggest concern. So built to last?
Gruntsworth Mazda builds there cars and SUV for people that love driving. The build quality is amazing. They have excellent power and amazing gas mileage. I have owned many, CX5 and Mazda 3 that we have now. Never any issues.
@@Gruntsworth Tell her that with the advances in engine technology, these 4 cylinder motors completely hold their own with a v6. I highly recommed the Lemon Aid books written by Phil Edmunston!!! Awesome for anyone looking for a reliable vehicle :)
My 2002 BMW 330i was totaled. The cx5 was a no brainer because of its acceleration, handling and looks. I am not missing my BMW at all. Also, the bmw always broke my bank.
Alex, I am 6’3” mid 200s in weight and am quite comfortable in this vehicle. Love the turbo. On the open highway I get close to the 30mph. If I could add one thing it would be to increase the fuel tank size on the Turbo versions. ( 2 gallons more ) From an enthusiasts driver point of view this maybe one of the most engaging CUVs for those of us who really like to drive. I have said it before and will say it again here...the CX5 family of CUVs has almost something for everyone of us who is an enthusiastic driver and at an affordable price point. They are stylish, sporty, fun to drive, reliable, safe, and that on occasion one can take off the beaten path.
I have the top of the line non-turbo 2018 CX5 and the car is an amazing value for the money. Like one other youtuber claimed many times, Mazdas have the best transmissions out of any brand and any car up to $60,000. I do agree. The transmission in the car is out of this world and completely makes the car what it is - and now with the Turbo, it should be the blast to drive too. Although coming from a 306 HP car to this 186 HP car, believe it or not, is not a massive downgrade. This car is also extremely quiet and behaves very well with the power it has. Both the transmission and the noise levels are better than my $60k Lexus GS. I also love the simple black and white design in the car console. No color other than the entertainment screen. Simple and elegant. The seats are not super comfortable and they are tiny for anyone with an actual butt (side patting will bother you thies). Any other car you look into, whether it's a Nissan Rouge, Rav 4 or pick a different brand, has a wider seating area in the seats. And I am not a fat person by any means (6 ft, 175 pounds) and it's clear the seats were originally made for Asian market/people. The gas mileage is 27 avarage which is not the best, but its on regular. RDX will be $15-17k more to buy ($250+ more to lease) and takes premium fuel. Insurance cost is very low on the CX5 too compared to RDX. Lastly, I never ever touched the touch screen as the toggle near the arm rest is very good and my Lexus didn't have a touch screen either so I got used to it. If you would not tell people its a touch screen, they would not know or need it. The entertainment design (what you see on the screen) is better in the Mazda compared to a Lexus, although the sound system was better sounding in the Lexus. Sound is only bass and trebble in the Mazda, not mids. Very weird. As long as you don't expect Subaru AWD capability and amazing seating, it's the best car in the segment. I am paying $349 with 0 down and 12k miles a year on a lease (I could not get a RDX below $700 on a lease). I would not buy any Korean car over this, and never buy a GM product. Honda has currently issues with oil consumption and Toyota will not be as quiet and elegant compared to Mazda. This car is in a class of its own because, again, transmission. If the seating bothers you after a test drive, see if you can get the CX9. That car is a gem.
I too am not a fan of the bose system. Really overrated. I have already received a $3500 quote from a quality audio/installation shop to make the system significantly better
Even though I ended up getting the CR-V, I thought the CX-5 was very compelling and a very close 2nd. It's definitely the prettiest car in its class inside and out, and it's the most fun to drive. Unlike you, I actually liked the seats a lot, but that can be subjective. For me the CX-5's weak spot was the infotainment system. I couldn't figure out how to save a radio station, and the salesperson couldn't either. I think it was a mistake to disable the touch screen while driving. If you use Apple CarPlay, a lot of programs are designed for touch screen. I'd hate to think about using Waze and Spotify, for instance, without touch screen. Still, I'm surprised the CX-5 isn't a top 5 seller in America. It's #1 in Australia, so apparently the Aussies appreciate it. It definitely belongs at or near the top of its class.
I just bought a 2019 with the Touring trim. I test drove the turbo model, and I loved the extra power, but the Grand Touring Reserve, which is the cheaper trim with the turbo engine, would have cost me about 6000 more than the Touring. I just couldn't justify the extra cost on top of the worse fuel economy just to get the turbo engine. There are some other extras like the heads-up display, but nothing I couldn't do without. And the non-turbo CX-5 still has more power and better handling than the 4-cylinder Camry it replaced, so I'm still having a blast driving it. Thank you very much for your detailed reviews. They really helped me zero in on a winner, and it was the CX-5!
Christopher Nasca I bought the Touring trim with the preferred options package and red paint, which was an up-charge. I got it for 26,400, plus tax. Everything else was included (delivery, tag, title, etc.). I think I got a good deal.
Bought my 2019 CX5 Grand Touring on Sunday. Couldn't be happier. Test drove the Lexus, and it was nice, but couldn't justify the huge price jump. Didn't get to drive the Acura RDX but that one was even pricier by all accounts so same issue there. Thanks for the help in making my decision Alex! Best reviewer I've seen.
Mazdas have now swept all of us (re my family)into its luxury looks and likeability. We have 3 Mazdas 3Sdn(2017) 3Hb(2018) 6 Sport(2017).(We transitioned from our Corolla, Camry) Kept my distance from their models since 1990 and have been converted since 2017. Have been recommending friends ever since with some success. Boot space was a concern at the start of all these mazdas but once we got our first mazda we found it silly to procrastinate, with driving safety our biggest joys and happiness. Thank you mazda.
When comparing this to the Honda CRV, yes, the honda has more room. But, what I havent heard any journalist talk about is the 1.5l engine failure that so many owners are experiencing. And initially, coporate Honda denying any problems and continuing to sell a vehicle with a bad engine. Hoorah for Mazda!!!
If I have to guess the journalists probably signed the NDA to prevent them from talking about anything currently in investigation or have not been recalled / settled. Alex and others can only use general terms such as reliability but cannot use something specific. Not like the freedom that Scotty has. Also Alex, as other journalists, are focusing on the initial quality of newly released vehicles. Which makes them not in the position to talk about reliability issues.
Denver Cayle Ong skyactiv’s are high compression engines so whatever noise you here is quite normal and for your information its been proven to be a very reliable platform
@@souls3029 I do know that it's reliable. I do know that the direct injectors are loud also. What I'm trying to say this guy questions a Mazda if it'll last 10 years but my 25 year old Mazda 323 is still alive and refined. Also appreciate the skyactiv G for being more powerful, cleaner, and efficient than the B engine of the 323.
point defense, I have no idea how this car rides. I don't even want to test drive it because it is just not a good looking SUV at all. It does not even look like an SUV. Not much leg room in the rear as well as head room. Imagine, a hump in the back seat. How dated. The car looks like a hatchback to me. I am going with the CRV. Good looking, spacious, nice interior, and not everybody has the oil problem. The CRV has a nice ride and is pretty peppy. The only thing with the CRV is the stereo sucks. The car manufacturers nickel and dime you with everything. Fuc**** rip off.
13:25 Love it when everything's on the left side of the wheel ;) Just kidding, I absolutely love your reviews Alex. Very professional and you always have that little info or detail that other reviews left out!
Alex, you are my favorite reviewer because your reviews are so complete with real world performance numbers as opposed to just an opinion. I enjoy all of your reviews. How do you feel this cx-5 would compare to the Lexus nx 300?
Jack Liu Toyota and Honda lead in the sales numbers but personally I think the Mazda is a better vehicle. It’s more of a niche brand that targets enthusiasts rather then your average shopper like the other two.
After test driving the GS/GX I was about to leave the dealership to think about it, then the salesman threw me the keys to the 2019 GT Turbo with a smirk on his face. I knew I would buy it before getting to the first set of lights. What a difference the Turbo makes!
My daughter looked at the CX5 and the Honda CR-V. She chose the Mazda (looks, feel, size). She says that it is still one of the larger vehicles in her L. A. office parking lot! Sometimes smaller is better.
10tenman, The Honda CRV is bigger and more spacious then this juke box. Did you see the hump in the back seat? I have not seen that in quite a few years. How dated.
@@roberta.lofgrenjr.9182 Yeah, I personally sat in and drove both. It's often hard to know what vehicle is the right size. If you have kids or need to transport things generally bigger is better. If you don't have kids and 99% of your driving is to work then you really don't need a big vehicle. Here, I like the CX5 as it's more of a personal sized car and drives very nicely. The CR-V is also fine but the size is a bit high
@@10tenman10 Well, Both are considered small SUV"S. I don't like anything too small, we'll that did not sound right, I meant when you are in a car. The CRV is spacious. You are not cramped. Good amount of leg room in front and rear. The Mazda CX5 looked tight in the back seat, plus the big hump in the middle.
I own a 2019 Cx-5 signature model. It is by far the best in class. Main reasons, three things. All other vehicles in its class can offer what the CX-5 offers. However,they can’t offer the design, the turbo and the handling, which is a Mazda staple.
I've had the 2019 Reserve Turbo since May of 19, and I haven't had any issues. It's fun to drive and handles well. I'm actually averaging 25 mpg in combo city/highway. My only negative comment is that I wish the infotainment system booted up quicker. I don't need to see a warning sign every time I start the vehicle.
Me too. 6AT should be reliable, since it is a simple unit. The big torque from bottom revs will make it a very comfortable car do drive. I don't trust belt/chain CVTs to be reliable while doing a lot of engine breaking - I need to be able to do that while driving in the mountains.
Mazda's autos are some of the best in the industry. They have been historically reliable and they do exactly as you imagine it should. The ones I've driven seem to almost read your mind.
7:33 Yes! This is the kind of top-tier AoA camera angle I've been missing over the past couple years. I still miss the exclusive trunk comfort index, though...
I took the turbo cx5 for a test drive today and was surprised (based on all the great reviews) how unrefined the Mazda 5 drove. Suspension felt bumpy, bouncy and still suv like with average steering response. The seats are WAY to firm and very uncomfortable. My girlfriend took this test drive with me and completely agreed. We were both nauseas after 25 minute ride. Not the test drive we were expecting. Will likely go with rav4 xse due to nicer interior, much better fuel economy, better overall ride, much comfier seats, and higher expected reliability. I'll also say the Volvo xc40 has been BY FAR our fav test drive. T5 engine matches this turbo Mazda and suspension is MUCH more refined. Yes I know it's a luxery compact SUV and $10000 more but the difference between cx5 and xc40 is night & day. Enthusiasts that can afford the xc40 I highly suggest taking one for a test drive.
Thanks. Very few of the reviews mention the significant driving problems of the CX-5. Just the poor positioning of the center console cup holders shows inattention to detail and the promise of unpleasant driving moments over time. On the other hand, I don't know what SUVs James drives, but the ones used in our family, ranging from Acura to Highlander are excellent road cars. Mentioning the seats being WAY too firm and very uncomfortable comes up often enough to make the CX-5 a narrow miss for this shopper. The manufacturers miss an opportunity in not updating their two door coupé style with state of the art technology. Many of us shoppers don't need or even want an uncomfortable or restrictive second row. We need a clever use of storage and transport space and somewhere for on the road amenities, a travel desk, a small refer, not just a champagne bottle cooler, yeah we take home from good restaurants and shop at a distance for gourmet foods. I learned of the advantage of such designed spaces in a coach built Commer purchased in London in 1970. In many ways it was the most useful car sized vehicle I have ever seen. The rise in consumer interest shown in SUV and Crossover sales has not had a commensurate response from the manufacturers, nor much insight from those who choose to review for public enlightenment. If an oven were the best way to toast bread we would not need to keep toasters alive and well. Vehicles do not have to be everything to all people, and the variation in capability should go beyond mpg and driver comfort and passenger capacity. Pet owners still must consider an add on and then deal with the terrible issues of overheating interiors and unsafe containers. On and on the co grows, but not much thought is penetrating design rooms.
Great insights into the CX-5. I've had my eye on it for a while and now I want it even more. The show host really knows his vehicles inside and out. He uses the word "actually" as a filler word a lot, even when the comment isn't surprising. (maybe that's a millennial thing?)
As usual an excellent review, Alex. Full of detail and insights that aren't offered by others. A few comments. () Engine/Drivetrain. Of the vehicles (CX-5, CX-9, Mazda6, and in non-American markets, the CX-8) where Mazda offers their turbo4 , I think the most successful application is probably the CX-5. The Mazda6 trails both the Accord and Camry (top trim) rivals in performance and interior room. The CX-9 sacrifices both interior space and smooth, linear performance against its V6 competition. The CX-5 also sacrifices interior room against its competition but its performance is a major plus compared to the mainstream compact rivals. It's true that Mazda trails the competition in terms of the race to provide the most individual gears but the turbo4's massive torque covers a variety of sins and the six speed transmission is undoubtedly adequate even though it hurts fuel economy to some extent. () Styling. Like the CX-9 and Mazda6, the CX-5 has earned almost universal praise for its looks. But Alex is the only reviewer I've seen who pinpoints the reason for those looks, the long, long hood and the hood-to-body ratio of each vehicle. It's a styling decision that designers have employed for about a hundred years in sports cars and sedans to suggest potency and performance. A cynic might argue that a cheaper and more effective solution for the need it satisfies is a Viagra prescription. But far be it from me to suggest that. () Utility. The "U" in SUV stands for "utility." And Mazda's styling choices significantly shortchanges that priority. The sacrifice is nowhere near as great as in the CX-9 where interior passenger room and cargo space trails the "tweener" (Goldilocks) category that includes the Kia Sorento and the Hyundai Santa Fe even though the CX-9 is nearly a foot longer. But the CX-5 still offers far less overall cargo space and passenger room than a CR-V as well as several other of its rivals. Alex says he'd be willing to lose 25% of the overall cargo space compared to a CR-V and he's probably not alone. But those who don't have a Dodge Durango sitting in the garage as an option to haul cargo and passengers may have a different take on giving up utility for style and performance. () Overall. The CX-5 is Mazda's best selling model in the US. The option of a turbo4/AWD should boost those sales. But there are some compelling alternatives including the Subaru Forester with greater utility for less money and the Hyundai Santa Fe in a larger "tweener" category at about the same price.
Thanks, for a great video review. I've been waiting for your full test video since your shorter in the snow drive last month. I've been waiting on the 2019 model since the Fall and was hoping for the new changes, mainly a change in the GT wheel design and the addition of brown Nappa leather seat color. The turbo wasn't that big of a deal for me. I would opt for the GT with the premium package if it had come with the brown Nappa seats. As it was, I was going to wait until spring , but after a test drive 2 weeks before Christmas with my Wife (& Chief Financial Officer), we made a deal and bought a Soul Red 2019 GT Signature model. I love it so far. It's like a Starship compared to my old 07 Mazda 6i 5-door. My only quibbles are; 1. The brown leather is a little to dark. 2. The price was a little higher than I was hoping for and 3. The gas mileage is not as high so far (it still has less than 1,000 miles in Michigan winter driving) as I would like. The added power is great and the 360 degree camera and parking sensors are great to have. Thanks again for the great reviews.
Have an '03 Miata - no trouble since day one - just batteries/tires. Have a 2020 CX5 Signature Turbo - perfect size, luxurious, good mileage, and no cvt - it hauls!
i bought the grand touring reserve....traded in my 2017 outback 3.6r...i absolutely love driving it!! the only complaints i have to this point is it has a small fuel tank (15.2g) fuel mileage is at 18.5mpg...but i do drive it kinda hard....overall though ill take this over the subie any day!!
@Blair Thiessen i had the 2017 i had many issues with the infotainment system did not care for the cvt...everytime i started the car it would reset my xm channel to the preview channel...and when i would hit next channel it would select random channels...also did not like the brakes i thought they were way to spongee...the subie is a great car...just not my cup of tea
I was stuck between BMWx3, Audi q2 and Mazda CX-5. I chose and bought a CX-5 in October 2019 m. I’m so satisfied with the car love the design, looks so high class but costs so much less.
Loved almost everything about it, wished it was a little bit bigger. Went with the XC60 instead, which I think is just as good looking if not more. Unfortunately, had to pay much more, but got more too.
After testing the Honda CR-V EX, Mazda CX-5 Touring, Nissan Rogue SV, and Hyundai Santa Fe SEL, I decided to get the Honda CR-V, but the Mazda CX-5 was a very close second. The CX-5 was the best looking inside and out and had the most refined driving feel. I really felt that it was about a half step into the luxury class. However, the CR-V was not that far behind in interior and driving feel, and I liked the extra room, fuel economy, and just the fact that it's a Honda. I also preferred the touch screen infotainment system on the CR-V over the Mazda's which I found cumbersome and would have preferred a touch screen while driving. I find that especially with Apple Carplay a touch screen is very nice and I use it a lot. My girlfriend still bothers me about not picking the Mazda because that was her favorite. Alex did mention that aftermarket you can enable the touch screen while moving, which may have sealed the deal for me with Mazda had I known about it. BTW I was aware of the oil dilution controversy with the CR-V. I live in Florida so I didn't worry about it, and my CR-V appears to warm up very quickly.
This was a very thorough review and comparison video of sub crossovers. I'm hoping to get a 2019 CX-5 GT or Signature in about two years (refuse to buy new). It has all the features my 2014 is lacking. 😁
I test drove a Signature and really liked the car except that I felt the drivers seat was too hard and too short front to back. The firmness may have been due to the chilly day and the newness of the seats but that does not explain the lack of thigh support. Anyone have this concern? I see Alex gave the front seats a 9/10.
They shouldn't. One is a sedan other is a CUV. I took the CX5 because of a) ground clearence - I always manages to scrape my front bumber in parking lots with sedans and b) AWD. The 6 doesn't have AWD yet.
Tested both recently, the 6 just has too much torque steer with the turbo. I thought it would comparable to a 3 series or C-class but without AWD it just isn't. The CX-5 has AWD and is a much better drive with this engine & power band.
That's an overly positive opinion of the Mazda CX-5. What about the BMW X-3, Audi SQ5, Mercedes GLC and Jaguar F-Pace? These are much nicer than the Mazda. Not even close. They are just quite a bit more expensive.
Ross Headley this unit ran about $36k. It is a value given the amazing it has every feature available except for 360 camera, Nappa leather and parking sensors. The fit and finish exceeded my 2018 Accord Touring by a mile. Not even close. This car drive far better than the Honda and with the 2.5L turbo that provides 310 lb feet of torque that car is a rocket.
@@Mhike-m2x Until you are squealing thr tires on an onramp and a RDX 2.0T is on your tail. If Mazda engineers think it needed wider, grippier tires they would have out them on or at least offer it as an option.
The CX 5 Turbo models' 19 wheels will easily accommodate 245/50/19 tires, which I will add for the better braking and handling when the OEM tires wear out.
Why comparing this to RDX ? RDX costs $10k more. CX-5’s 6 speed transmission is superb and smooth that doesn’t need an extra cog. With 310 lbs-ft torque, it does not need to down shift as often as other 8 or 9 speed transmission.
A lot of people cross-shop these two models. I did. I ultimately decided that I really liked the RDX, but it was just a little more than I wanted to spend. But the CX-5 was the natural solution. A notch down in features and price, but in the same vein.
Where are you coming up with $10k? MSRP: RDX $37,400 CX-5 Signature MSRP: $36,890.. If you can find a Grand Touring Reserve, that would be MSRP: $34,870 so at most we're talking $2620 and in reality only $510. If I'm comparing stickers on in stock inventory near me, RDX: $39,400 , CX5: $37,885 ($1515). I want to get excited about the CX-5 Turbo, but it's priced too high.
Probably the only one this segment I would ever consider buying. Maybe the new Forester as well but it's pretty slow, but probably better off-road capabilities.
God damn. I have been watching every review I could find for this and it's competition because I'm in the market and the sheer level of detail you went into here is just above and beyond everyone else. All without some obnoxious gimmick or shitty persona. I'm buying this car but you still get a sub from me. Keep putting out this kind of content because of all the reviews I have voraciously consumed over the last several weeks yours was #1 with a bullet.
Yes, you're right that this is the best looking compact SUV, the Tucson is also very attractive out side but the interior Tucson has no match with CX-5.
for me, the front looks disproportionately long in profile-Mazda could lengthen the cab to fix this with additional benefit of larger cargo room and more rear seat room. The cx5 interior dash doesn’t appeal, but the cx9 dash/door actually looks good with seemingly minor tweaks in the lines.
I’m really liking the current Mazda lineup. So much so I can’t decide what to buy. Torn between the cx5 gt with turbo, Mazda 6 gt with the turbo, or a Mazda3 sport gt with a manual transmission. I honestly love all three and can not decide. Cx5 is the most practical the 3 is the most fun and the 6 is the the middle ground. They are all beautiful inside and out. I’m a fan of the scroll wheel. Been testing a lot of the competition and can’t find anything out there that compares with the quality and looks and driving dynamics of Mazda at the moment. I don’t understand why they don’t have a larger share of the market.
I think the cx-5 is now my ideal cuv. I'm usually a sedan person mainly cause I like the lower center of gravity but... the mazda is fast, handles well, gets similar mpg as my subaru legacy, has larger storage than my sedan and the transmission is a solid 6 speed. I dont need 30-40mpg... I rather have a transmission that only shifts when I need it and will last a long time. These cvts and 8/9 speeds take forever to gear hunt and it drives me nuts. Not to mention mazda reliability has much improved over the years
I wish Alex would add a new field to his process- Dealership Network. Mazda's dealership network has always been an utter fiasco with Mazda dealers opening and closing with little notification. The one time I bought a Mazda, I purchased it from a dealer that had been around for about 15 years and the literally CLOSED the next week. It doesn't matter how nice a car is, if you can't get decent service for it.
excellent review, especially when compare with other brands. however I don't think Honda CRV engine worth comparing at the moment with any of the other brands when it has real big oil dilution issue
I'll probably get this or an XC40 PHEV later this year. In Puerto Rico you get a tax exemption for plug in hybrids/battery vehicles, so loaded top-config Mazda is about $40k and loaded top-config Volvo is $47k (or a 5-10k mile used loaded XC60 T8 for $55k). Thanks for the great review!
It's the cutest but it is a LOT smaller than CRV and RAV 4 in real terms beyond the specs. Rear seat passenger room is compromised, trunk is at least 25% less space. That's a lot of compromising to look cool in your grocery getter...
I find the comfort ratings surprising. I'm really thin, but I've noticed the seats in the CX-5 are very narrow, and the side bolstering a bit hard in places. Also, the center console seems to take up way too much space.
A Honda CR-V has 589 litres of cargo space, a rav 4 has 580 litres, a Skoda Karoq has 520 litres, a VW Tiguan has 615 litres and a CX5 has 506 litres, these are all in standard form and none of them are anywhere near 25% larger than the CX5 the biggest bid the Tiguan at just over 20% larger but the rav4 and CRV, it’s main competitors, are both around 15% larger in this aspect.
Price the top model at 30k and they wouldn’t be able to build them fast enough. Just not sure about almost 40k for a small suv. Car world is out of control. But everyone keeps buying them at high prices so they keep pushing them higher. Love the cx5 and would consider it.
Somewhat impressed, am always searching for the one for myself,, as the only reason I want a Crossover is to obtain AWD. So why not try and find the best of all the features,, along with the best style. You did en excellent Presentation on this CX-5. Thanks and have a Great Day. The 2020 would most likely be my choice.
This review is one of the top two due to your detailed observations. I did buy a Soul Crystal Red 2019 CX 5 GT Reserve for US $34,050. in Henderson, NV, September 2019. I do wish it had an 8 speed auto transmission. More grunt in a lower 1st gear, better mileage in the higher 8th gear "overdrive". As-is it is a great SUV with a great BOSE 10 speaker audio system. I added a K&N engine air filter and occasionally raise the octane of our crappy 91 octane western US "premium" gas by adding 1/4 tank of 100 octane racing gas. (With a FULL tank of 100 octane gas this car FLIES! But at US $8.00 per gallon I will seldom do this.) So the turbo power, the upscale styling, upscale interior and the very good handling makes me love this compact SUV. Finally I will have a luxury vehicle. (Well, I did once own a silver Mazda RX-7 FD E last gen. design. PURE SEX!) NOTE: Compare the top two turbo, AWD CX 5 models, (GT Reserve and theSignature) to the Range Rover EVOQUE and you will see the CX 5 is rated by Consumer Reports as "Much Better Than Average" and the EVOQUE as "Much Worse Than Average". Plus the top 2 turbo CX 5s do 0-60 in 6.4 seconds and the EVOQUE does it in 6.8 seconds. Jus' sayin'...
I agree that the CX-5 is the top pick, particularly if one liked what they have to offer. From viewing, feeling and driving it myself, it’s a winner. As long as those who can pull their head out of ... their disposition of having to be seen in a luxury German or Japanese or other product, this vehicle like many Mazdas are as good if not better and it’s manufactured in Japan (QC; reliability). It’s true I chose a 2019 Santa Fe 2.0L, over this fantastic vehicle, yet only because I accept the SFe for being a little more roomy and rear under floor storage hat suits my specific needs and yes cost about $1200 more than the natural 2.5L CX-5 equivalent. My understanding is that both brands have predictive AWD (i.e. HTRAC / iActiv). Finally, after driving a 2019 RAV4, it unfortunately is no match against this CX-5 in my opinion and Toyota continues to hold out on options (some Safety too) by comparison, unless you buy the top trim.
Yes, CR-Vs and RAV4s have more cargo space. So do minivans. Styling and performance are far more important than a few extra cubic feet that you’ll rarely ever use.
Going through my private playlist and found this video. Have to say that this video pushed me to make the decision of buying a 2021 CX-5. It's almost 3 years from now and I'm still satisfied with it.
The side by side comparison at the end with competitors is very useful.
No way, I wouldn't want open-pore wood, this type of wood in the CX-5 is known as 'sen wood', which is meant to be subtle and not to stand out on its own but to accentuate the rest of the cabin. It's a Japanese wood, for a car designed by a Japanese company, that is still made in Japan.
As a side note, your channel is one of the few where you actually take the time and effort to give a proper presentation on the car. You don't stumble on words, you don't rush them out just to fill the silence, and all of it sounds like it was written well ahead of time and rehearsed before going on camera. We really appreciate the effort you put on all your videos!
You can tell Alex really really loves Mazda, so do I
I have a feeling the 2020 Escape may change his mind. On paper, its looking like a huge improvement on last gen.
I love Mazda too but I prefer Toyota because of its guaranteed reliability. I know Mazda has been pretty good but Toyota is a no risk purchase. I also feel that Toyota’s interior is just right
@@huskydinosaur2860: I hope you're right about the 2020 Ford Escape because Consumer Reports has proved through much testing thousands of customer reviews that that mode (style) vehicle has been rated very low for reliability and customer satisfaction in past years. I refuse to buy any Ford vehicles where I live because they have all been substandard, and our dealership's customer service is horrible and dishonest. I was once a big supporter of Ford cars, SUV's and trucks, but no longer.
@@rogersmoot6194 Consumer Reports said the Escape was "impressive" and overall recommended, with their only major gripe being safety features that were only available on the titanium model and need to be standard on all trims. Why do people make up stuff in youtube comment section all the time... sigh.
@@huskydinosaur2860 that escape is extremely ugly
I love Mazda. I have owned 4 of them. It’s about time they get recognized
Rodney Lennox They were. They just got in trouble over the RX-8 and had to take a break from competitiveness.
How is Mazda reliability? My mother is looking for a smaller SUV and hates "those 4 cylinders" because she thinks anything not a V6 is slow. I've been pushing for her to get one of these as it'll have the V6 grunt and she loves wood trim, but the Kia Sportage has a much longer warranty. I told her it won't be an issue as her current vehicle only has 50k miles on it so she doesn't put huge miles on her vehicles. Most miles she has had on a car is like 80k over 10 years. Powertrain is the biggest concern. So built to last?
Gruntsworth Mazda builds there cars and SUV for people that love driving. The build quality is amazing. They have excellent power and amazing gas mileage. I have owned many, CX5 and Mazda 3 that we have now. Never any issues.
@@Gruntsworth Tell her that with the advances in engine technology, these 4 cylinder motors completely hold their own with a v6. I highly recommed the Lemon Aid books written by Phil Edmunston!!! Awesome for anyone looking for a reliable vehicle :)
My 2002 BMW 330i was totaled. The cx5 was a no brainer because of its acceleration, handling and looks. I am not missing my BMW at all. Also, the bmw always broke my bank.
I'm exited man. Getting my mom the red signature trim for Mother's Day this Sunday. 🔥
Best son of the years god damm
I will exited out of this conversation
Alex, I am 6’3” mid 200s in weight and am quite comfortable in this vehicle. Love the turbo. On the open highway I get close to the 30mph. If I could add one thing it would be to increase the fuel tank size on the Turbo versions. ( 2 gallons more ) From an enthusiasts driver point of view this maybe one of the most engaging CUVs for those of us who really like to drive. I have said it before and will say it again here...the CX5 family of CUVs has almost something for everyone of us who is an enthusiastic driver and at an affordable price point. They are stylish, sporty, fun to drive, reliable, safe, and that on occasion one can take off the beaten path.
I have the top of the line non-turbo 2018 CX5 and the car is an amazing value for the money. Like one other youtuber claimed many times, Mazdas have the best transmissions out of any brand and any car up to $60,000. I do agree. The transmission in the car is out of this world and completely makes the car what it is - and now with the Turbo, it should be the blast to drive too. Although coming from a 306 HP car to this 186 HP car, believe it or not, is not a massive downgrade. This car is also extremely quiet and behaves very well with the power it has.
Both the transmission and the noise levels are better than my $60k Lexus GS. I also love the simple black and white design in the car console. No color other than the entertainment screen. Simple and elegant.
The seats are not super comfortable and they are tiny for anyone with an actual butt (side patting will bother you thies). Any other car you look into, whether it's a Nissan Rouge, Rav 4 or pick a different brand, has a wider seating area in the seats. And I am not a fat person by any means (6 ft, 175 pounds) and it's clear the seats were originally made for Asian market/people.
The gas mileage is 27 avarage which is not the best, but its on regular. RDX will be $15-17k more to buy ($250+ more to lease) and takes premium fuel. Insurance cost is very low on the CX5 too compared to RDX. Lastly, I never ever touched the touch screen as the toggle near the arm rest is very good and my Lexus didn't have a touch screen either so I got used to it. If you would not tell people its a touch screen, they would not know or need it. The entertainment design (what you see on the screen) is better in the Mazda compared to a Lexus, although the sound system was better sounding in the Lexus. Sound is only bass and trebble in the Mazda, not mids. Very weird.
As long as you don't expect Subaru AWD capability and amazing seating, it's the best car in the segment. I am paying $349 with 0 down and 12k miles a year on a lease (I could not get a RDX below $700 on a lease). I would not buy any Korean car over this, and never buy a GM product. Honda has currently issues with oil consumption and Toyota will not be as quiet and elegant compared to Mazda. This car is in a class of its own because, again, transmission.
If the seating bothers you after a test drive, see if you can get the CX9. That car is a gem.
I too am not a fan of the bose system. Really overrated. I have already received a $3500 quote from a quality audio/installation shop to make the system significantly better
I got a 2017 RDX AWD Tech Package 15K year miles 39 month lease at $450 month w/ just $500 down.
Old Timer of course you do. That’s the ugly old RDX before the redesign.
Even though I ended up getting the CR-V, I thought the CX-5 was very compelling and a very close 2nd. It's definitely the prettiest car in its class inside and out, and it's the most fun to drive. Unlike you, I actually liked the seats a lot, but that can be subjective. For me the CX-5's weak spot was the infotainment system. I couldn't figure out how to save a radio station, and the salesperson couldn't either. I think it was a mistake to disable the touch screen while driving. If you use Apple CarPlay, a lot of programs are designed for touch screen. I'd hate to think about using Waze and Spotify, for instance, without touch screen. Still, I'm surprised the CX-5 isn't a top 5 seller in America. It's #1 in Australia, so apparently the Aussies appreciate it. It definitely belongs at or near the top of its class.
@@Bohunk123456 What's wrong with the Bose?
I just bought a 2019 with the Touring trim. I test drove the turbo model, and I loved the extra power, but the Grand Touring Reserve, which is the cheaper trim with the turbo engine, would have cost me about 6000 more than the Touring. I just couldn't justify the extra cost on top of the worse fuel economy just to get the turbo engine. There are some other extras like the heads-up display, but nothing I couldn't do without. And the non-turbo CX-5 still has more power and better handling than the 4-cylinder Camry it replaced, so I'm still having a blast driving it.
Thank you very much for your detailed reviews. They really helped me zero in on a winner, and it was the CX-5!
Wise decision.
I'm also shopping the touring trim. Can I ask how much did you pay?
Christopher Nasca
I bought the Touring trim with the preferred options package and red paint, which was an up-charge. I got it for 26,400, plus tax. Everything else was included (delivery, tag, title, etc.). I think I got a good deal.
@@Admiral87Crunch oh wow. that trim with package MSRP is $29k . Very good deal
Christopher Nasca I had one dealership make me a very good offer, and another one countered and beat them.
Bought my 2019 CX5 Grand Touring on Sunday. Couldn't be happier. Test drove the Lexus, and it was nice, but couldn't justify the huge price jump. Didn't get to drive the Acura RDX but that one was even pricier by all accounts so same issue there.
Thanks for the help in making my decision Alex! Best reviewer I've seen.
that new RDX is quite thirsty, and the interior materials in the CX-5 isn't far off. i think you did better with the Mazda. and no start-stop!
@@twystedhumour That's the CVT I keep hearing about right?
Mazdas have now swept all of us (re my family)into its luxury looks and likeability. We have 3 Mazdas 3Sdn(2017) 3Hb(2018) 6 Sport(2017).(We transitioned from our Corolla, Camry) Kept my distance from their models since 1990 and have been converted since 2017. Have been recommending friends ever since with some success. Boot space was a concern at the start of all these mazdas but once we got our first mazda we found it silly to procrastinate, with driving safety our biggest joys and happiness. Thank you mazda.
I absolutely love it. I think it’s one of the best looking vehicles on the road. And that interior...amazing
When comparing this to the Honda CRV, yes, the honda has more room. But, what I havent heard any journalist talk about is the 1.5l engine failure that so many owners are experiencing. And initially, coporate Honda denying any problems and continuing to sell a vehicle with a bad engine.
Hoorah for Mazda!!!
The Honda 1.5T is in millions of vehicles at this point. A very, very small percentage have run into the oil dilution issue.
@@raisethereef it's still an issue, and should be talked about.
@@raisethereef Fake information. This is a new engine and it is not in millions of vehicles. Do your research before you post false information.
If I have to guess the journalists probably signed the NDA to prevent them from talking about anything currently in investigation or have not been recalled / settled.
Alex and others can only use general terms such as reliability but cannot use something specific. Not like the freedom that Scotty has. Also Alex, as other journalists, are focusing on the initial quality of newly released vehicles. Which makes them not in the position to talk about reliability issues.
Imagine shelling out your $35,000 and you get that oil dilution gas smell in the interior and Honda will deny this is an issue.
In my opinion the CX-5 is the best-looking vehicle in the segment.
yea...but will it last 10yrs on the road..
@@illduitmyself yes, my Mazda 323 is 25 years old and is even quiter on idle than my Mazda 2 skyactiv G.
Denver Cayle Ong skyactiv’s are high compression engines so whatever noise you here is quite normal and for your information its been proven to be a very reliable platform
@@souls3029 I do know that it's reliable. I do know that the direct injectors are loud also. What I'm trying to say this guy questions a Mazda if it'll last 10 years but my 25 year old Mazda 323 is still alive and refined. Also appreciate the skyactiv G for being more powerful, cleaner, and efficient than the B engine of the 323.
point defense, I have no idea how this car rides. I don't even want to test drive it because it is just not a good looking SUV at all. It does not even look like an SUV. Not much leg room in the rear as well as head room. Imagine, a hump in the back seat. How dated. The car looks like a hatchback to me. I am going with the CRV. Good looking, spacious, nice interior, and not everybody has the oil problem. The CRV has a nice ride and is pretty peppy. The only thing with the CRV is the stereo sucks. The car manufacturers nickel and dime you with everything. Fuc**** rip off.
13:25 Love it when everything's on the left side of the wheel ;) Just kidding, I absolutely love your reviews Alex. Very professional and you always have that little info or detail that other reviews left out!
😅😅
Talk about answering ALL my questions!!
Alex, you are my favorite reviewer because your reviews are so complete with real world performance numbers as opposed to just an opinion. I enjoy all of your reviews. How do you feel this cx-5 would compare to the Lexus nx 300?
I own it, love it, and it is perfection.
Mazda is on a roll. Their vehicles are top picks in many car segments. As always, great review Alex 😊.
Just not getting the sales of everyone else through.
Still not even close to toyota or honda
@@RKO859 You mean Lexus and Acura?
@@RKO859 Keep dreaming you brainwashed fool.
Jack Liu Toyota and Honda lead in the sales numbers but personally I think the Mazda is a better vehicle. It’s more of a niche brand that targets enthusiasts rather then your average shopper like the other two.
Daughter has one on the high seas at the moment. Delivery in February. Our family are big Mazda fans.
After test driving the GS/GX I was about to leave the dealership to think about it, then the salesman threw me the keys to the 2019 GT Turbo with a smirk on his face. I knew I would buy it before getting to the first set of lights. What a difference the Turbo makes!
Just bought a 2016 and it's a pleasure to drive. Mazda does a really nice job with their mid-level crossover.
My daughter looked at the CX5 and the Honda CR-V. She chose the Mazda (looks, feel, size). She says that it is still one of the larger vehicles in her L. A. office parking lot! Sometimes smaller is better.
10tenman, The Honda CRV is bigger and more spacious then this juke box. Did you see the hump in the back seat? I have not seen that in quite a few years. How dated.
@@roberta.lofgrenjr.9182
Yeah, I personally sat in and drove both. It's often hard to know what vehicle is the right size. If you have kids or need to transport things generally bigger is better. If you don't have kids and 99% of your driving is to work then you really don't need a big vehicle. Here, I like the CX5 as it's more of a personal sized car and drives very nicely. The CR-V is also fine but the size is a bit high
@@10tenman10 Well, Both are considered small SUV"S. I don't like anything too small, we'll that did not sound right, I meant when you are in a car. The CRV is spacious. You are not cramped. Good amount of leg room in front and rear. The Mazda CX5 looked tight in the back seat, plus the big hump in the middle.
Those of us looking to replace our aging Forester XTs will certainly be checking out the CX-5 Turbo.
I own a 2019 Cx-5 signature model. It is by far the best in class. Main reasons, three things. All other vehicles in its class can offer what the CX-5 offers. However,they can’t offer the design, the turbo and the handling, which is a Mazda staple.
Very comprehensive review. I learned more features on my 2019 mazda cx5 by watching this video. Great knowledge bro.
I've had the 2019 Reserve Turbo since May of 19, and I haven't had any issues. It's fun to drive and handles well. I'm actually averaging 25 mpg in combo city/highway. My only negative comment is that I wish the infotainment system booted up quicker. I don't need to see a warning sign every time I start the vehicle.
I like the Mazda CX-5!! Awesome job Alex.
Yes, definitely the most attractive entry in this segment. I especially like the bubbly rear with those sharp taillights.
I rather have this than those CVT.
Me too. 6AT should be reliable, since it is a simple unit. The big torque from bottom revs will make it a very comfortable car do drive. I don't trust belt/chain CVTs to be reliable while doing a lot of engine breaking - I need to be able to do that while driving in the mountains.
CVT simply rubbish
Mazda's autos are some of the best in the industry. They have been historically reliable and they do exactly as you imagine it should. The ones I've driven seem to almost read your mind.
@@valdius85 Yeah a Mazda will be more reliable then a Toyota CVT... 😂
I love CVT
7:33 Yes! This is the kind of top-tier AoA camera angle I've been missing over the past couple years. I still miss the exclusive trunk comfort index, though...
Angle of Attack?
I took the turbo cx5 for a test drive today and was surprised (based on all the great reviews) how unrefined the Mazda 5 drove. Suspension felt bumpy, bouncy and still suv like with average steering response. The seats are WAY to firm and very uncomfortable. My girlfriend took this test drive with me and completely agreed. We were both nauseas after 25 minute ride. Not the test drive we were expecting. Will likely go with rav4 xse due to nicer interior, much better fuel economy, better overall ride, much comfier seats, and higher expected reliability. I'll also say the Volvo xc40 has been BY FAR our fav test drive. T5 engine matches this turbo Mazda and suspension is MUCH more refined. Yes I know it's a luxery compact SUV and $10000 more but the difference between cx5 and xc40 is night & day. Enthusiasts that can afford the xc40 I highly suggest taking one for a test drive.
Thanks. Very few of the reviews mention the significant driving problems of the CX-5. Just the poor positioning of the center console cup holders shows inattention to detail and the promise of unpleasant driving moments over time. On the other hand, I don't know what SUVs James drives, but the ones used in our family, ranging from Acura to Highlander are excellent road cars. Mentioning the seats being WAY too firm and very uncomfortable comes up often enough to make the CX-5 a narrow miss for this shopper. The manufacturers miss an opportunity in not updating their two door coupé style with state of the art technology. Many of us shoppers don't need or even want an uncomfortable or restrictive second row. We need a clever use of storage and transport space and somewhere for on the road amenities, a travel desk, a small refer, not just a champagne bottle cooler, yeah we take home from good restaurants and shop at a distance for gourmet foods. I learned of the advantage of such designed spaces in a coach built Commer purchased in London in 1970. In many ways it was the most useful car sized vehicle I have ever seen. The rise in consumer interest shown in SUV and Crossover sales has not had a commensurate response from the manufacturers, nor much insight from those who choose to review for public enlightenment. If an oven were the best way to toast bread we would not need to keep toasters alive and well. Vehicles do not have to be everything to all people, and the variation in capability should go beyond mpg and driver comfort and passenger capacity. Pet owners still must consider an add on and then deal with the terrible issues of overheating interiors and unsafe containers. On and on the co grows, but not much thought is penetrating design rooms.
Great insights into the CX-5. I've had my eye on it for a while and now I want it even more.
The show host really knows his vehicles inside and out. He uses the word "actually" as a filler word a lot, even when the comment isn't surprising. (maybe that's a millennial thing?)
255/45r20 tires on 20 x 8.5 rims will absolutely fit and transform overall handling and looks. Mazda fan here!
Best review I’ve seen
Those teeny tiny fog lights look so funny and adorable to me.
Those are fairly useless. The LED headlights are all you need. They are perfect for after the sun goes down!
Very insightful comparisons. Great summary of pros and cons. Kudos, Alex!
Sold Me , Im buying ONE.
I love ir. My new suv for next year. Of course the Signature model. Yessss
Love it
No panoramic moonroof? Good, who needs them!
@10tenman10 ...Not to mention they add about 150-200lbs at the roof. This increases risk of rolling over and decreases handling
Agreed. Can’t wait for that fad to pass.
I've never been able to figure out why people would want a moon roof.
I DO!
@@vickyabramowitz4919 To look at the Moon?
Best CX-5 review on UA-cam and very informative
As usual an excellent review, Alex. Full of detail and insights that aren't offered by others. A few comments.
() Engine/Drivetrain. Of the vehicles (CX-5, CX-9, Mazda6, and in non-American markets, the CX-8) where Mazda offers their turbo4 , I think the most successful application is probably the CX-5. The Mazda6 trails both the Accord and Camry (top trim) rivals in performance and interior room. The CX-9 sacrifices both interior space and smooth, linear performance against its V6 competition. The CX-5 also sacrifices interior room against its competition but its performance is a major plus compared to the mainstream compact rivals. It's true that Mazda trails the competition in terms of the race to provide the most individual gears but the turbo4's massive torque covers a variety of sins and the six speed transmission is undoubtedly adequate even though it hurts fuel economy to some extent.
() Styling. Like the CX-9 and Mazda6, the CX-5 has earned almost universal praise for its looks. But Alex is the only reviewer I've seen who pinpoints the reason for those looks, the long, long hood and the hood-to-body ratio of each vehicle. It's a styling decision that designers have employed for about a hundred years in sports cars and sedans to suggest potency and performance. A cynic might argue that a cheaper and more effective solution for the need it satisfies is a Viagra prescription. But far be it from me to suggest that.
() Utility. The "U" in SUV stands for "utility." And Mazda's styling choices significantly shortchanges that priority. The sacrifice is nowhere near as great as in the CX-9 where interior passenger room and cargo space trails the "tweener" (Goldilocks) category that includes the Kia Sorento and the Hyundai Santa Fe even though the CX-9 is nearly a foot longer. But the CX-5 still offers far less overall cargo space and passenger room than a CR-V as well as several other of its rivals.
Alex says he'd be willing to lose 25% of the overall cargo space compared to a CR-V and he's probably not alone. But those who don't have a Dodge Durango sitting in the garage as an option to haul cargo and passengers may have a different take on giving up utility for style and performance.
() Overall. The CX-5 is Mazda's best selling model in the US. The option of a turbo4/AWD should boost those sales. But there are some compelling alternatives including the Subaru Forester with greater utility for less money and the Hyundai Santa Fe in a larger "tweener" category at about the same price.
Watching a car review at 12 AM from California.
Thanks, for a great video review. I've been waiting for your full test video since your shorter in the snow drive last month.
I've been waiting on the 2019 model since the Fall and was hoping for the new changes, mainly a change in the GT wheel design and the addition of brown Nappa leather seat color.
The turbo wasn't that big of a deal for me. I would opt for the GT with the premium package if it had come with the brown Nappa seats. As it was, I was going to wait until spring , but after a test drive 2 weeks before Christmas with my Wife (& Chief Financial Officer), we made a deal and bought a Soul Red 2019 GT Signature model. I love it so far. It's like a Starship compared to my old 07 Mazda 6i 5-door.
My only quibbles are; 1. The brown leather is a little to dark. 2. The price was a little higher than I was hoping for and 3. The gas mileage is not as high so far (it still has less than 1,000 miles in Michigan winter driving) as I would like. The added power is great and the 360 degree camera and parking sensors are great to have.
Thanks again for the great reviews.
Have an '03 Miata - no trouble since day one - just batteries/tires. Have a 2020 CX5 Signature Turbo - perfect size, luxurious, good mileage, and no cvt - it hauls!
i bought the grand touring reserve....traded in my 2017 outback 3.6r...i absolutely love driving it!! the only complaints i have to this point is it has a small fuel tank (15.2g) fuel mileage is at 18.5mpg...but i do drive it kinda hard....overall though ill take this over the subie any day!!
@Blair Thiessen i had the 2017 i had many issues with the infotainment system did not care for the cvt...everytime i started the car it would reset my xm channel to the preview channel...and when i would hit next channel it would select random channels...also did not like the brakes i thought they were way to spongee...the subie is a great car...just not my cup of tea
Thanks for the review on the new turbo charged engine on the CX5. It's a great compact SUV even without the new engine.
It is the prettiest in this segment and I think near top in the luxury of the same size segment.
Great job Alex! Perhaps the best car review I have ever seen. Keep up the good work.
I was stuck between BMWx3, Audi q2 and Mazda CX-5. I chose and bought a CX-5 in October 2019 m. I’m so satisfied with the car love the design, looks so high class but costs so much less.
Loved almost everything about it, wished it was a little bit bigger. Went with the XC60 instead, which I think is just as good looking if not more. Unfortunately, had to pay much more, but got more too.
Outstanding detailed review.Thk you.
360 gang
Couldn't agree more with everything you said. The trade offs are totally with it. Just had the 2020 GTR delivered.
After testing the Honda CR-V EX, Mazda CX-5 Touring, Nissan Rogue SV, and Hyundai Santa Fe SEL, I decided to get the Honda CR-V, but the Mazda CX-5 was a very close second. The CX-5 was the best looking inside and out and had the most refined driving feel. I really felt that it was about a half step into the luxury class. However, the CR-V was not that far behind in interior and driving feel, and I liked the extra room, fuel economy, and just the fact that it's a Honda. I also preferred the touch screen infotainment system on the CR-V over the Mazda's which I found cumbersome and would have preferred a touch screen while driving. I find that especially with Apple Carplay a touch screen is very nice and I use it a lot. My girlfriend still bothers me about not picking the Mazda because that was her favorite. Alex did mention that aftermarket you can enable the touch screen while moving, which may have sealed the deal for me with Mazda had I known about it. BTW I was aware of the oil dilution controversy with the CR-V. I live in Florida so I didn't worry about it, and my CR-V appears to warm up very quickly.
This was a very thorough review and comparison video of sub crossovers. I'm hoping to get a 2019 CX-5 GT or Signature in about two years (refuse to buy new). It has all the features my 2014 is lacking. 😁
I test drove a Signature and really liked the car except that I felt the drivers seat was too hard and too short front to back. The firmness may have been due to the chilly day and the newness of the seats but that does not explain the lack of thigh support. Anyone have this concern? I see Alex gave the front seats a 9/10.
Mazda 6 or CX5. Those two are making it difficult for me to choose my next vehicle🙏
They shouldn't. One is a sedan other is a CUV. I took the CX5 because of a) ground clearence - I always manages to scrape my front bumber in parking lots with sedans and b) AWD. The 6 doesn't have AWD yet.
@@LifeISMagix The Mazda 6 already as AWD, it's just not been sold in North-America.
Tested both recently, the 6 just has too much torque steer with the turbo. I thought it would comparable to a 3 series or C-class but without AWD it just isn't. The CX-5 has AWD and is a much better drive with this engine & power band.
Wrong, test the 2k18 turbo just last month and it's still FWD in Australia where we get all variants @@deet4895
+Dee T Tbh we probably wouldn't buy it, like the Manual Variants of cars...
Probably the best compact crossover in under the $250,000 category!
That's an overly positive opinion of the Mazda CX-5. What about the BMW X-3, Audi SQ5, Mercedes GLC and Jaguar F-Pace? These are much nicer than the Mazda. Not even close. They are just quite a bit more expensive.
Wow, They also added a cup holder to the engine cover..
I just bought a 2019 CX-5 Grant Touring Reserve in Dark Blue Mica. Black leather interior, drives like a dream. Love this car and how it drives.
How much otd
Ross Headley this unit ran about $36k. It is a value given the amazing it has every feature available except for 360 camera, Nappa leather and parking sensors. The fit and finish exceeded my 2018 Accord Touring by a mile. Not even close. This car drive far better than the Honda and with the 2.5L turbo that provides 310 lb feet of torque that car is a rocket.
@@cruisyguy man your really selling it. Haha. I've seen a lot of 2016s for sale for around 20k. No turbo though...
Ross Headley Ha! I drove the lower end non turbo unit and while nice just lacked the torque I prefer. Sold!
Yay, I have been waiting for this one!
"Grip level are actually higher in a Kia Sportage..."?
He said driving feel doesnt necessary translate to actual grip. But u can chanhe to wider tires as he said to improve them
@@Mhike-m2x Until you are squealing thr tires on an onramp and a RDX 2.0T is on your tail.
If Mazda engineers think it needed wider, grippier tires they would have out them on or at least offer it as an option.
The CX 5 Turbo models' 19 wheels will easily accommodate 245/50/19 tires, which I will add for the better braking and handling when the OEM tires wear out.
Eric B. My cx5 rolls on 275/40x22 just fine
Wow! 22" wheels are huge. Maybe I'll keep the19" wheels and go up to 250 or 255 width.
The front of the hood is an excellent pedestrian slicer.
The speaker in the a pillar vibrates and rattles, I'm surprised Mazda didn't fit this, mine is a 2024.
Why comparing this to RDX ? RDX costs $10k more. CX-5’s 6 speed transmission is superb and smooth that doesn’t need an extra cog. With 310 lbs-ft torque, it does not need to down shift as often as other 8 or 9 speed transmission.
A lot of people cross-shop these two models. I did. I ultimately decided that I really liked the RDX, but it was just a little more than I wanted to spend. But the CX-5 was the natural solution. A notch down in features and price, but in the same vein.
Where are you coming up with $10k? MSRP: RDX $37,400 CX-5 Signature MSRP: $36,890.. If you can find a Grand Touring Reserve, that would be MSRP: $34,870 so at most we're talking $2620 and in reality only $510. If I'm comparing stickers on in stock inventory near me, RDX: $39,400 , CX5: $37,885 ($1515). I want to get excited about the CX-5 Turbo, but it's priced too high.
meh are you comparing the base RDX to the highest trim Mazda CX-5 though? I wonder how many people actually buy a base model luxury vehicle.
meh thats a base model RDX fool, do you know what it comes with, just four wheels and a engine 😂
RDX? Overrated & Hondas are slipping badly. I choose Mazda.
Thanks for the comparison to the RDX! I liked both at my last auto show visit... Not sure I can stomach the higher sticker price for the Acura.
This is the sexiest cx5 ever
Alex, great review. thank you so much.
Probably the only one this segment I would ever consider buying. Maybe the new Forester as well but it's pretty slow, but probably better off-road capabilities.
God damn. I have been watching every review I could find for this and it's competition because I'm in the market and the sheer level of detail you went into here is just above and beyond everyone else. All without some obnoxious gimmick or shitty persona. I'm buying this car but you still get a sub from me. Keep putting out this kind of content because of all the reviews I have voraciously consumed over the last several weeks yours was #1 with a bullet.
Yes, you're right that this is the best looking compact SUV, the Tucson is also very attractive out side but the interior Tucson has no match with CX-5.
for me, the front looks disproportionately long in profile-Mazda could lengthen the cab to fix this with additional benefit of larger cargo room and more rear seat room. The cx5 interior dash doesn’t appeal, but the cx9 dash/door actually looks good with seemingly minor tweaks in the lines.
No. Mazda can't fix the length. Because soon they will build another CUV, bigger than CX5, smaller than CX9
Alex's music choices are always appreciated
Bu
H hi u
U
Thanks for your detailed analysis. Would like a comparison to the Hyundai Tucson too.
I’m really liking the current Mazda lineup. So much so I can’t decide what to buy. Torn between the cx5 gt with turbo, Mazda 6 gt with the turbo, or a Mazda3 sport gt with a manual transmission. I honestly love all three and can not decide. Cx5 is the most practical the 3 is the most fun and the 6 is the the middle ground. They are all beautiful inside and out. I’m a fan of the scroll wheel. Been testing a lot of the competition and can’t find anything out there that compares with the quality and looks and driving dynamics of Mazda at the moment. I don’t understand why they don’t have a larger share of the market.
I love that I can put my fishing rods in the middle.
I think the cx-5 is now my ideal cuv. I'm usually a sedan person mainly cause I like the lower center of gravity but... the mazda is fast, handles well, gets similar mpg as my subaru legacy, has larger storage than my sedan and the transmission is a solid 6 speed. I dont need 30-40mpg... I rather have a transmission that only shifts when I need it and will last a long time. These cvts and 8/9 speeds take forever to gear hunt and it drives me nuts. Not to mention mazda reliability has much improved over the years
I wish Alex would add a new field to his process- Dealership Network. Mazda's dealership network has always been an utter fiasco with Mazda dealers opening and closing with little notification. The one time I bought a Mazda, I purchased it from a dealer that had been around for about 15 years and the literally CLOSED the next week. It doesn't matter how nice a car is, if you can't get decent service for it.
Excellent review sir!
Great review...very informative!!
Great looking car. I love the Mazda brand
excellent review, especially when compare with other brands. however I don't think Honda CRV engine worth comparing at the moment with any of the other brands when it has real big oil dilution issue
Love your review!! Thanks!
When Alex is on, Everything, and I mean EVERYTHING goes on HOLD and you watch ALEX! Time to learn a thing or two
Glad to have this Baby !
Excellent review.
I'll probably get this or an XC40 PHEV later this year. In Puerto Rico you get a tax exemption for plug in hybrids/battery vehicles, so loaded top-config Mazda is about $40k and loaded top-config Volvo is $47k (or a 5-10k mile used loaded XC60 T8 for $55k). Thanks for the great review!
After my X3 M40i lease is up I’m going back to Mazda. While the BMW is a nice ride, for the price the cars are good enough for daily living.
It's the cutest but it is a LOT smaller than CRV and RAV 4 in real terms beyond the specs. Rear seat passenger room is compromised, trunk is at least 25% less space. That's a lot of compromising to look cool in your grocery getter...
I find the comfort ratings surprising. I'm really thin, but I've noticed the seats in the CX-5 are very narrow, and the side bolstering a bit hard in places. Also, the center console seems to take up way too much space.
A Honda CR-V has 589 litres of cargo space, a rav 4 has 580 litres, a Skoda Karoq has 520 litres, a VW Tiguan has 615 litres and a CX5 has 506 litres, these are all in standard form and none of them are anywhere near 25% larger than the CX5 the biggest bid the Tiguan at just over 20% larger but the rav4 and CRV, it’s main competitors, are both around 15% larger in this aspect.
Price the top model at 30k and they wouldn’t be able to build them fast enough. Just not sure about almost 40k for a small suv. Car world is out of control. But everyone keeps buying them at high prices so they keep pushing them higher. Love the cx5 and would consider it.
Somewhat impressed, am always searching for the one for myself,, as the only reason I want a Crossover is to obtain AWD. So why not try and find the best of all the features,, along with the best style. You did en excellent Presentation on this CX-5. Thanks and have a Great Day. The 2020 would most likely be my choice.
I wish Mazda would make the cargo space more competative.
This review is one of the top two due to your detailed observations. I did buy a Soul Crystal Red 2019 CX 5 GT Reserve for US $34,050. in Henderson, NV, September 2019. I do wish it had an 8 speed auto transmission. More grunt in a lower 1st gear, better mileage in the higher 8th gear "overdrive". As-is it is a great SUV with a great BOSE 10 speaker audio system.
I added a K&N engine air filter and occasionally raise the octane of our crappy 91 octane western US "premium" gas by adding 1/4 tank of 100 octane racing gas. (With a FULL tank of 100 octane gas this car FLIES! But at US $8.00 per gallon I will seldom do this.)
So the turbo power, the upscale styling, upscale interior and the very good handling makes me love this compact SUV. Finally I will have a luxury vehicle. (Well, I did once own a silver Mazda RX-7 FD E last gen. design. PURE SEX!)
NOTE: Compare the top two turbo, AWD CX 5 models, (GT Reserve and theSignature) to the Range Rover EVOQUE and you will see the CX 5 is rated by Consumer Reports as "Much Better Than Average" and the EVOQUE as "Much Worse Than Average". Plus the top 2 turbo CX 5s do 0-60 in 6.4 seconds and the EVOQUE does it in 6.8 seconds. Jus' sayin'...
Thank you for your excellent and thorough review. I love my 2016 CX-5 GranTouring AWD and I'm thinking that my next new vehicle will be a 2020 CX-5.
I agree that the CX-5 is the top pick, particularly if one liked what they have to offer. From viewing, feeling and driving it myself, it’s a winner. As long as those who can pull their head out of ... their disposition of having to be seen in a luxury German or Japanese or other product, this vehicle like many Mazdas are as good if not better and it’s manufactured in Japan (QC; reliability). It’s true I chose a 2019 Santa Fe 2.0L, over this fantastic vehicle, yet only because I accept the SFe for being a little more roomy and rear under floor storage hat suits my specific needs and yes cost about $1200 more than the natural 2.5L CX-5 equivalent. My understanding is that both brands have predictive AWD (i.e. HTRAC / iActiv). Finally, after driving a 2019 RAV4, it unfortunately is no match against this CX-5 in my opinion and Toyota continues to hold out on options (some Safety too) by comparison, unless you buy the top trim.
Very good review as usual and great car..
Yes, CR-Vs and RAV4s have more cargo space.
So do minivans.
Styling and performance are far more important than a few extra cubic feet that you’ll rarely ever use.