Secret formula to a great discussion section or chapter of your paper or thesis
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 гру 2021
- Schedule a free 1-1 strategy session with me to see how I can help you achieve your research goals: academicenglishnow.com/schedu...
Learn how to publish 3+ research papers EVERY year in high-impact Scopus-indexed journals: academicenglishnow.com/3paper... At Academic English Now we support PhD students and researchers in publishing research papers in Q1 Scopus-Indexed journals. We are apssionate about helping researchers and PhD students express their research ideas with greater confidence. We have worked with 400+ researchers and PhD students. Our clients have published in Q1 Scopus-indexed journals, including such renown journals as Nature Ecology & Evolution.
Tips for structuring a cohesive and coherent discussion section:
1. Restate the main result
2. compare it with the literature.
3. Explaining differences between our results and previous researchers' results.
4. Interpret the findings to explain the main takeaway message
Writing my discussion section brought me here 😂
Hope the video helps :)
Same happened with me , great help sir
Same with me
Same 😂😂
This is surprising, me as the reader did not expect this please elaborate in this discussion section
So precise! Thank you!
I am in last few weeks of my PhD thesis writing. So this was so useful. Many thanks
Thanks Marek, you help me a lot.
Great....explanation. Thank you;
Nice presentation! Thank you..
Thank you very much, it was very helpful
This was very helpful. Thank you!
Very valuable video!
Thank u for the valuable information
Thanks Marek for your fantastic work. Really helpful
Thank you 😍
Easy to understand and do
omg this is so concise yet helpful!! i cant thank you enough
Thanks so much!
Thanks for explanation
Thank you!
Very helpful,Thank you
Very helpful. Please, how can one integrate theoretical framework into the discussion?
Great tips
splendid mate
Starts at 1:50
Recently my paper was rejected in the journal of environmental planning and management published by Taylor and francis because I compared my findings with previous studies by saying “my findings are consistent with those of previous studies...... “. I immediately concluded that the editor must go back to school and study research methodology again
Hello there! Great presentation, however I have a comment // question. From my experience so far in publications of papers regarding economics, the process that you described concerns the results section, while in discussion I normally refer to significance and practical implications. Is there a general consensus about the thematic of each section or it is just a matter of experience with economic journals? Shall the results be presented in a different manner? Thank you very much in advance!
Thanks
amazing
I have a question ig data is not normally distributed how do you interpret it in the disscussion chapter
My thesis topic is prevalence of diabetes mellitus in rural areas,and now I'm stuck completely in discussion
thank you very much!
You're welcome
I dont understand how you'll compare your findings from the literature that you actually obtained those findings from 🤔
Hey Marek....lovely videos
Can u make a video on theoretical contributions...and how can one write it
Many thanks
thanks. For sure. Will do :)
Sadly, discussion chapter is not 1 paragraph, but usually 2-10 pages. And I would break the discussion chapter into 1.Explaining results. 2. Open Challenges. 3. Future directions. ->And discuss about everything you mentioned within those sections.
Hello there, I just started on my Phd journey. I live in Mumbai India. So am not sure if free one to one session with you is feasible or not, given we are countries and time zones apart...but I am hugely interested in obtaining valuable guidance from you through the one-to-one session.
I am struggling writing the discussion especially if there is no similar studies to compare or discuss
Can you explain the differences between the discussion section within a chapter and the main discussion chapter. I have three studies in my thesis and I am writing each study as a chapter then a main discussion chapter. Thank you
Same for me. I kind of finshed writing the discussion within chapters. Now I don't know how to write the main discussion chapter. Have you finished the writing?
Schedule a 1-1 strategy session with me to see how I can help you achieve your PhD goals: academicenglishnow.com/schedule?UA-cam&+formula+discussing+results
I tried to register for a session that he offered for free and I mentioned that i have a budget and that his price per session will give me an idea how many I can afford since the first one was for free and he didn’t provide prices online. Afterwards he sent me an email saying he can’t help me and I that we are not a good fit to work together!!! Very disappointing!
I only said I need hell organizing my ideas and make my writing more readable, how is that not a good fit! Or is it just the money part?
Hi Alaa! We receive more applications that we can take, so we scrutinize each individually using various criteria picking a handful of those that are of highest quality, and ones we're very confident we'll be able to help and work with
This same thing happened to me. It is all about money and business here.
@alaaalamri8352 This same thing happened to me. It is all about money and business here.
I hate that all these videos are basically adverts of their services :(
He is providing you with a complete and in full explanation of exactly what the title says for free. Approx 30 seconds of a 6 minute video is an advertisement of his services that can greatly help others in need. Also dont forget this is his job, hes not doing this for fun.
Getting pointed help on any specific issue necessitates consultation. Nuance exists.