Heraclitus of Ephesus | Fire, The Elements, and the Cosmos | Philosophy Core Concepts

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 27

  • @Rev-bb9ej
    @Rev-bb9ej 4 роки тому +8

    Your understanding of ancient greek adds so much value to these lectures. The way you outlined how the word καταλήψεται has a mental as well as a physical role allows people to have a much better understanding of Heraclitus' conception of fire and its connection to logos. Great stuff.

    • @sturmanaskie
      @sturmanaskie 4 роки тому

      yes I agree, I appreciate the references to the original greek text I think it adds a lot also

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  4 роки тому

      Glad that was helpful for you!

  • @uniphcommunity.thewhitetower

    Heraclitus was one of the Presocratics who never revealed anything, never concealed anything but talked through signs! Thank you so much for reminding us!!!

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  Рік тому

      Well, he said the god does that. Not sure we can say that Heraclitus himself is doing that

  • @thefinnishbolshevik2404
    @thefinnishbolshevik2404 4 роки тому +5

    Looking forward to more videos on the pre-socratics

    • @leandrosanchez1212
      @leandrosanchez1212 3 роки тому

      Do you think heraclitus is an influence upon hegel and thus Marx?

  • @MrMarktrumble
    @MrMarktrumble 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you. Very good lecture. Made me see some things in new ways.

  • @cowchips91
    @cowchips91 4 роки тому +2

    15:45 So what I'm getting from this is that fire "judges" and fire "groks"

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  4 роки тому +1

      Or something does, and Heraclitus calls it "fire"

  • @seanf5134
    @seanf5134 2 роки тому +1

    Awesome!!

  • @apepeterpan
    @apepeterpan 4 роки тому +2

    Brilliant videos, thank you. Would love to see something on Pyrrho & possible connections with India at some point in the future, but anything is great!

  • @themushroom2130
    @themushroom2130 4 роки тому +1

    so if death for one thing means the birth of another, it is suggesting that death of thing x directly leads to birth of thing y? as in the change we observe in biodegradation and the use of the biodegraded material as fuel for plant?

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  4 роки тому

      It's always tricky to read in more to Heraclitus than what we have in the text

    • @SleazyRider86
      @SleazyRider86 3 роки тому

      That makes a lot of sense if you think in the sense of the Cycle of Life

  • @Theorymaster666
    @Theorymaster666 4 роки тому +2

    Interesting video. What book were you using?

  • @Retrogamer71
    @Retrogamer71 4 роки тому +1

    Patreon Sponsor's Subscription Hyperlink ... 0:48

  • @sturmanaskie
    @sturmanaskie 4 роки тому

    maybe constant flux is a property of the logos

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  4 роки тому +1

      Then it wouldn't really be much of a "property"

    • @malpais776
      @malpais776 4 роки тому +1

      @@GregoryBSadler
      Thank you for that Dr. THAT is something really worth considering. !

    • @sturmanaskie
      @sturmanaskie 4 роки тому

      @@GregoryBSadler you got me there. Maybe I should ask is the logos a constant that constantly changes? you know how physicists say the laws of physics were different at the time of big bang.. etc

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  4 роки тому +1

      @@sturmanaskie Those don't seem analogous at all to me. Changing once wouldn't be like constantly changing