Avangard Hypersonic Missiles unveiled: Is Russia ready for WW3?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 813

  • @yanbemopatton
    @yanbemopatton Рік тому +438

    The very fact that Russia military is built to fight NATO and its allies while NATO is built to fight single country ( Russia) says it all.

    • @muzikri4203
      @muzikri4203 Рік тому +26

      Precisely thats true

    • @brianwesley28
      @brianwesley28 Рік тому +10

      But, but, but AEGIS ashore was being deployed in European countries because of Iran! Russia never fell for that.

    • @brianwesley28
      @brianwesley28 Рік тому

      @@FrancisWaterworth-dv4hu You should watch Military Summary channel each day on UA-cam. Russia is taking over Ukraine. 😳

    • @muzikri4203
      @muzikri4203 Рік тому +22

      @@FrancisWaterworth-dv4hu Its just special military operation. Not take over whole country. Just reminder for Ukraine to not join NATO only.

    • @larsnystrom6698
      @larsnystrom6698 Рік тому +16

      @yanbemopatton
      When NATO is crowding Russia military, we shouldn't be surprised that Russia builds their military to defend against it.
      NATO was the organization preparing for a war against the Sovjet Union.
      But it were for some reason used in an attempt defeat Russia.
      Why?

  • @mjk7505
    @mjk7505 Рік тому +212

    Russia displays military engineering genius. Why America keeps poking the bear is sheer madness.

    • @UNotSeeMe2024
      @UNotSeeMe2024 Рік тому +1

      It’s mad from both sides

    • @rthelionheart
      @rthelionheart Рік тому +15

      Mother Russia has no beef with anyone in Central and South AMERICA. It isn't all that hard to say the US instead.

    • @RU_Aleks
      @RU_Aleks Рік тому

      @@rthelionheart There are no claims against the United States, but there are questions for the government and especially for Grandpa Joe and his legal capacity. This is some kind of surrealism in the terminal stage. I am convinced that "this play" has no intermission and one cannot rely on adequacy and prudence. Now almost all possible international institutions of diplomacy have been compromised in one way or another thanks to the ruling elite of the United States, the UN has generally become something like a rest room where you can chat with dudes and have a little discussion about the fucked up world. and go about your business in different directions.))
      So it remains to watch this historical madness with wide-open eyes

    • @YahayaYusuf-nc3pb
      @YahayaYusuf-nc3pb Рік тому +4

      and interfering in other countries' affairs

    • @ISRAEL-CONTROL-AMERICA
      @ISRAEL-CONTROL-AMERICA Рік тому +2

      Just say US and not all american continent are as mad as US especially their government.

  • @Testio26
    @Testio26 11 місяців тому +138

    When Putin announced the development of hypersonic weapons in 2018 along with the Poseidon submarine NATO laughed! Well they re not laughing now!!

    • @wadopotato33
      @wadopotato33 10 місяців тому +2

      Russian Weapons are almost always overrated, that said there was never any laughing. The West has a tendency to overrate Russian weapons.

    • @Doonit_hard_way_since_65
      @Doonit_hard_way_since_65 10 місяців тому +1

      Like the massive failure the Kinzhal is? Intercepted by a USA design from the 1970's. It's fun to watch Ru throw money at a technology they can't produce in numbers, that costs them a fortune, then is a complete flop on the battlefield. (armada tank, looking at you too)

    • @Testio26
      @Testio26 10 місяців тому

      @@Doonit_hard_way_since_65 You really believe the parrot that can’t even shoot down a slower a supersonic eskaders shot down a kinzhal?? Is this mentality of western weapons are the best has let to the humiliation of all US weapons supplied to Ukraine! Three years ago the Saudis complained to the US that the patriots couldn’t even intercept one Iranian missile when 12 of them were launched by the Houthi’s at their oil refinery in Jeddah! Guess who were operating the patriot system, Yes US army. Stop believing the hype about US weapons. They are useless!! Ask yourself why the US hasn’t retaliated against the Iranian when they launched a missile attack against a secret military training facility in Jordan killing US citizens!! Because the US is worried about retaliation by Iran!! Yes Iran! And by the way, the patriot systems were no where to be seen against a supersonic weapons! So keep believing

    • @Ярослав-д2ф1в
      @Ярослав-д2ф1в 10 місяців тому +18

      @@Doonit_hard_way_since_65 when they tell you that 100 out of 100 Kunzhal are being shot down, listen to them, because 99 objects are already burning

    • @johngeiger3770
      @johngeiger3770 10 місяців тому

      It is NATO doctrine to belittle and underestimate enemies with wishful thinking. The comments are proof enough. It is the opposite to the 'Art of War' where you are advised to never underestimate your enemies, and in fact, over-prepare yourself. "Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face." Old Mikey knew more about war than NATO could ever dream of.

  • @LordMarksman14
    @LordMarksman14 Рік тому +201

    Meanwhile, the US military is still debating who gets to use the toilet.

    • @cblawrence6468
      @cblawrence6468 Рік тому +8

      😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @dicksonsisya349
      @dicksonsisya349 Рік тому +5

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @tarinax7526
      @tarinax7526 Рік тому +4

      Meanwile the US military dont show off what they have and we dont know about ;)

    • @minhnguyen96
      @minhnguyen96 Рік тому +12

      @@tarinax7526wym the US military is having problems recruiting new troops and current troops arnt re-enlisting… LOL all advance weapons with no one to use it 😂😂

    • @mighty8
      @mighty8 Рік тому +6

      @@tarinax7526 🤡🤡😂😂

  • @nyashachimwara6352
    @nyashachimwara6352 Рік тому +241

    It feels like one side is prepared for ww3 whilst the other side thinks they are bluffing, it's gonna be lit

    • @nosebleedd3820
      @nosebleedd3820 Рік тому +39

      Lit? We are all going to die 😂 it’s not about fighting, it’s all about the money being made.

    • @yougetaspear7799
      @yougetaspear7799 Рік тому +3

      😲🤔

    • @14k46
      @14k46 Рік тому

      we will be fkd

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 Рік тому

      The problem I think is that Russia thinks that by building these advanced nuclear weapons, they will be held in respect and fear. The reality is, they are held in disgust, contempt and anger.. All this escalation will provoke is a western response in kind. Is Putin, so stupid to think that Western Nations can’t or won’t develop advanced nuclear weapons and rocket boosters and other innovations. In fact, the United States has already displaying a new intermediate range ballistic missile due to rushes breaking of the treaty. Putin Now began to escalate in an attempt to bully and threaten the small nations around the Russian federation imperial borders. Pin really looks like a fool and he will look more of a fool. He will soon be the most hated man in Russia by Russians.

    • @sixphilly
      @sixphilly Рік тому +11

      @@RedClipsYT
      ? That’s like telling a fish to not fear air.

  • @jaimemartinez8971
    @jaimemartinez8971 Рік тому +122

    34,000 km per hour!! Damn dude!!!

    • @Feechurd
      @Feechurd Рік тому +10

      Thats 60,000 kmph or 17 km per second

    • @jaimemartinez8971
      @jaimemartinez8971 Рік тому +6

      @@Feechurd I don’t know what could possibly stop this!!!

    • @bruswain9158
      @bruswain9158 Рік тому +8

      It said 34000 kph not mph

    • @doriangray6633
      @doriangray6633 Рік тому +1

      I couldn't think that slow if I tried!

    • @serbianforestman
      @serbianforestman Рік тому

      @@jaimemartinez8971 Its unposiblle.

  • @V.E.G.A.C0RE
    @V.E.G.A.C0RE Рік тому +96

    Ok politics are fine but nobody is gonna talk about that speed? Mach 27 is crazy, most fighter jets go between mach 1 and mach 3, the technology required for that speed while still being maneouvrable is insane

    • @moodogco
      @moodogco Рік тому +4

      Yh reentry speed from a ballistic maneuver etc it's no different from the reentry speed of the space shuttle or trident 2 ballistic missile etc

    • @ireallyreallyreallylikethisimg
      @ireallyreallyreallylikethisimg Рік тому +6

      I'll believe it when I see it

    • @moodogco
      @moodogco Рік тому +3

      @@ireallyreallyreallylikethisimg fair enough

    • @IcarosImmortal
      @IcarosImmortal Рік тому +3

      High spped mouvering = maintaining same track for long distance, probably driven by an algorythm

    • @DimbweMazala
      @DimbweMazala Рік тому +8

      There is no fighter that has ever gone past Mach 3. The Mig25 and Mig31 are respectively the fastest fighters ever build capable of Mach 3 and mach 2.83

  • @yudhihartadi6636
    @yudhihartadi6636 Рік тому +220

    Russia has right to defend itself ❤ 🇷🇺

  • @skll1822
    @skll1822 Рік тому +34

    we created and tested this rocket and began to create a new one. This is the arms race. You cannot defeat Russia in a war, only peace.

    • @wadopotato33
      @wadopotato33 10 місяців тому

      Because theyvhave nukes. In a conventional war Russia would be smashed by NATO...no contest.

  • @fredhampton321
    @fredhampton321 Рік тому +101

    Russia unveiled the Avangard hypersonic missile, a cutting-edge weapon capable of traveling at unprecedented speeds, evading conventional defenses. With the ability to maneuver during flight, this advanced technology enhances Russia's strategic capabilities, posing a significant development in the global arms race and reshaping military dynamics.

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 Рік тому

      Yes, in Russia will still get completely destroyed by nuclear response if she dares use it. Obnoxious leadership runs Russia It uses these weapons to try and impress and bully, the small nations around it. All that will happen now is that the number and quality of weapons in the west will increase to respond to Russia, provocations and escalation. How stupid is this of Russia? Do you think we’re not capable of building impressive bed nuclear weapons and rocket boosters?

    • @grzegorzkowalski9413
      @grzegorzkowalski9413 Рік тому +16

      Russia is the best

    • @ninetysnano6071
      @ninetysnano6071 Рік тому

      Do some research, Putin launched these off in 2018 when Trump visited to show off their capabilities. There’s a reason Trump said building the USS Gerald Ford was a waste of money.
      This is old news.

    • @Joel-pi2tt
      @Joel-pi2tt Рік тому

      More like a nuclear disaster in 2017 that was never perfected. Does it hit its target? Ehhhhh some times. Is it reliable? Absolutely not. Are their countermeasures not disclosed to the public? Yes. America only lets the public know of technology that is at least a decade or two old. Radars were upgraded decades ago to spot them. Also America has used hypersonic projectiles for a long time. Besides a single stealth bomber could knock out the launch site. Also new satellite weapons use directed dense EMP and other Directed Energy. Just like the Poseidon Putin will show this to the world not because it is awesome. But because he knows it isn’t and wants to impress idiots. Reminds me of the T-14 that uses a shit engine and manual reactive defences.

    • @wasswagodfrey915
      @wasswagodfrey915 Рік тому +1

      Thank you for reporting. The way you organize your report and the style of presenting is so good that it's hard to get tired of listening to the news

  • @TodKopfstein
    @TodKopfstein Рік тому +19

    this thing changed everything. only time I've seen the vainglorious western mask slip is when they talk about the advancements of hypersonic Russian missiles... and also their thermobaric weaponry

  • @richardtibbetts574
    @richardtibbetts574 Рік тому +41

    But Sean Penn has said that we shouldn’t fear a nuclear war. 😳

    • @LB-mo1dp
      @LB-mo1dp 10 місяців тому

      CINE ESTE Sean Penn UN ACTOR , CE SPUNE REPLICI INVATATE DE LA ALTIII

    • @barbosaguzman6101
      @barbosaguzman6101 4 місяці тому +3

      Sean Penn has a bunker in his backyard
      What do we have?
      Where do we go?
      UA-cam has a habit of hiding my comment.

    • @scorefield6273
      @scorefield6273 Місяць тому

      😂😂😂

  • @ziauddin7948
    @ziauddin7948 10 місяців тому +14

    Russia's military technology is not what it was in 2nd world war # Russia has developed enormously its military weapons technology & has long range missiles capable of carrying nuclear weapons with capability to hit entire US & european cities # 🇵🇰

  • @AbdulAzeez-s2d
    @AbdulAzeez-s2d Рік тому +55

    Russian Czar is the world's most powerful and destructive Hydrogen bomb ever made

    • @888Jt88
      @888Jt88 Рік тому +21

      Actually, the Tsar Bomba was the most powerful ever "tested" at 50MT. Russia has a Tsar Bomba II @ 100MT they decided not to test because of the environmental destruction it would cause. It's my understanding Russia now has a 200MT bomb as,well.

    • @knowledge3563
      @knowledge3563 Рік тому

      Gen. Mark Milley say ukriane lost two hundred thousand soldiers 200000
      russia have taken about 27%of ukraine in a year
      publish data on Ukrainian losses during the current conflict on January 14, 2023:
      - 1,157,000 dead
      - 234,000 injured
      - 27,230 in captivity,
      - 934 dead NATO instructors (USA and Great Britain),
      - 32,458 dead NATO servicemen (Germany, Poland, Lithuania, etc.)
      - 15,360 dead mercenaries.
      A message to the future generations never make russia feel threatened
      the difference between "looking dangerous" and "being dangerous".Russia
      describes military doctrine as defensive military doctrine. With regard
      to nuclear weapons specifically, Russia reserves the right to use
      nuclear weapons: in response to the use of nuclear and other types of
      weapons of mass destruction against it or its allies,in case of
      aggression against Russia with the use of conventional weapons when the
      very existence of the state is threatened
      How do Russian nuclear weapons compare to the rest of the world?
      Russia - 6,257
      America 5,550
      UK - 225
      France - 290
      China - 350
      Israel - 90
      Pakistan - 165
      India - 156
      North Korea - 40

    • @AugustusOmega
      @AugustusOmega Рік тому +9

      @@888Jt88 Russia has 6 GT devices loitering off both US coasts...1000 megatons each

    • @WringtonGamer
      @WringtonGamer Рік тому +2

      @@AugustusOmega and you know this how?

    • @AugustusOmega
      @AugustusOmega Рік тому +2

      @@WringtonGamer Trajectory estimation and putting a few known facts together.

  • @Juan-md6go
    @Juan-md6go Рік тому +55

    Russia must double its efforts to achieve their goals. Russian rights must be recognised by the west .

    • @borali26
      @borali26 Рік тому

      Khinzal was also called "hipersonic" but patriot ADF destroyed them. After that Putin started to persecute scientists and in response CIA decided to invite them to US.
      Nothing that Russia does should be trusted until checked at least twice.

    • @denchar1741
      @denchar1741 Рік тому +1

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @ungijazapranje
      @ungijazapranje Рік тому +2

      @johnregan6323bc the world oustide US does exist

    • @franskuijs3556
      @franskuijs3556 Рік тому

      Which are ?

  • @michaelgoldman3812
    @michaelgoldman3812 Рік тому +22

    I understand that the Hypersonic Missile is capable of Speeds up to Mach 22, which NATO and the US have no defense for!

    • @Orbital_Inclination
      @Orbital_Inclination Рік тому +6

      Yes they do. The countermeasures for hypersonic missiles are exactly the same ones used for other types of missiles. The only change is that the defender needs to react faster.
      The Russian propaganda about them being unstoppable is bs.

    • @TheGrindcorps
      @TheGrindcorps Рік тому +3

      No, not at all. Russia would not have developed this if that was the case because they have had Mach 20+ missiles deployed since late 1950’s. Boost glide maneuvering vehicles are very different from traditional reentry vehicles.

    • @moonZe_konZa
      @moonZe_konZa Рік тому +5

      ​@@Orbital_Inclinationyou are wrong and you know that

    • @rontobungoluciano7298
      @rontobungoluciano7298 Рік тому +7

      @@Orbital_Inclination nope. specification says that the warhead is moving so fast that it is traveling in a cloud of plasma, which doesn't reflect radio waves, and which makes it a true stealth weapon, giving invisibility against any missile defense system. As far as I remember the design of that type of weapons started when US started to deploy a new missile defense system around russia, lying as usual, that it is not being built against russia, rather agains iran. but russians didn't buy that bullshit anymore, so they tried to oppose the deployment, then gave up and have built a new concept for the nuclear charge delivery to restore the parity, no matter what missile defense system is built. they simply don't care anymore.

    • @gautheuil6210
      @gautheuil6210 11 місяців тому

      ​@@rontobungoluciano7298 The whole "plasma based stealth" is bullshit, NASA had that problem with their spacecraft re-entering the atmosphere and they developped better radars to fix it.

  • @AntiNazi1945
    @AntiNazi1945 Рік тому +44

    Advice, don't be fools, don't provoke Russia, better think thrice,

    • @TheBlackwater200
      @TheBlackwater200 Рік тому +10

      They won't listen to warnings

    • @darkslaerdark
      @darkslaerdark Рік тому +1

      ​@@FrancisWaterworth-dv4hu Russia is not weak.

    • @ashantethomas6356
      @ashantethomas6356 11 місяців тому +1

      U don’t provoke the USA

    • @TheBlackwater200
      @TheBlackwater200 11 місяців тому +2

      @@ashantethomas6356 The US is not what it used to be it's a lot different now.

    • @polycarpmukemi5277
      @polycarpmukemi5277 11 місяців тому

      The us has weapons you've never heard of ,

  • @abuubaydullah1
    @abuubaydullah1 Рік тому +32

    When we consider that US and Russa are at the close's point less than 4 kilometres a part Although the countries are divided by the Bering Strait,that is 53 kilometres wide at its narrowest point it wouldn't take many bombs/rockets to distroy each other along with the rest of the world .

    • @axiondarion4899
      @axiondarion4899 Рік тому +8

      Maybe but Alaska is weak compared with Russia. Canada is between the rest of the USA and thats a big problem.. Russia could take Alaska easy., and from there they are very close to the USA and the USA far away from Russia.

    • @neilread9464
      @neilread9464 Рік тому

      ​@axiondarion4899 Russia would never invade USA, it would take 10m or 20m troops. And your going to send everything through the Bearing Sea. Whilst leaving Russia open to European invasion.

    • @axiondarion4899
      @axiondarion4899 Рік тому +4

      @chillwill5080 Sea control is not that hard with the hypersonic anti ship missles. If Russia downs a few ships with thse missles the US navy will fall back. Because the US can not make hypersonics ;-)

    • @axiondarion4899
      @axiondarion4899 Рік тому

      @chillwill5080 You dealt with Russia.... Pls dont watch to much Rambo movies ur self man. Of course Russia is now weaker, but Putin build the army a lot up compared with a few years ago. You only watch on the battlefield man, but Russia have the best ICBMs and nuclear submarines there are man. You are just a pipo de clown who watch to much movies man.

    • @ФеликсДзержинский-ф2ш
      @ФеликсДзержинский-ф2ш Рік тому

      @chillwill5080 Friend, wake up and don't live in the past. In Russia, industry has already overtaken Germany, and I’m not even talking about the USA. The USA is a soap bubble of government debt, propaganda and brave Hollywood films. The only thing that keeps the US economy afloat is the dollar. Do you know why there is a war in Ukraine? Technology my friend, technology. The 3,200 scientists exported from Germany after World War II grew old and died, and the refugees from the Eastern bloc ended. And in the EU, the United States, fearing superiority, did not allow science to develop. All scientific discoveries and developments over the past 30 years came to you after the collapse of the USSR. All methods for producing microchips using lithography at 68-130, 28-7 nanometers are discovered by Russians. you couldn’t even convert to the inch system and gave it to ASML. We in Russia could not produce using our own technologies, recognizing Western patents on our developments until 2022. It's all over, thieves' happiness for the West. In Russia, 30 new enterprises are launched every month. Developments for 1 nanometer and less than 1 nanometer are ready. We replace old reactors with new ones operating on fast neutrons, and recycle nuclear waste. We already have the third prototype and two variants of thermonuclear reactors. We are already learning to synthesize materials, have discovered the control of the chaos of quantum particles, are working on evidence from the Russian scientist Leonov, who confirmed that unlimited force exists in the universe (the 5th force in physics) by building anti-gravity engines. 25 years ago the whole West laughed at him, now they are using his drawings to create and try to understand something.
      Russia is now the only country in the world that can produce any production cycle from 0 to the final product. We are the world of science and the United States is sliding into the Stone Age.
      You know what I like about Americans. They can sell the world a cobblestone from the pavement, making everyone believe that it is golden :) Sell the whole world the F35 with the developments of Russian scientists of the 60s, passing it off as a stealth fighter. Stealth technology is called "Diffraction of magnetic waves" by Russian scientist Ufimtsev.
      We already have a new science of electronic stealth. 2005 year. Last month there was a closed meeting of the UN Security Council. The reason for the US claims against Russia. It turns out you can’t fly fighters that NATO radars can’t see. Kirby cries for the Alabuga pulse missile to be handed over to world experts; it allegedly poses a threat to the world. What threat to the world? It poses a threat to the aircraft carrier and its entire environment. Can burn out all the electronics in the entire group. The most humane rocket. and so on in all respects. The only thing we can't keep up with is engines for wide-body aircraft. Only by 2030. It’s okay, we’ll fly at 4 PS 90. So, my friend, don’t live in illusions.

  • @cedricjoseph5504
    @cedricjoseph5504 Рік тому +13

    That's 9.4 KM per second.. 34,000km / hr divided by 3600 seconds.

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio 9 місяців тому

      Oh so not as bad as I thought, so most of the US defence systems can take it out, sweat.

    • @Tigr_Rus
      @Tigr_Rus 3 місяці тому

      @@BoiStudio 🤣

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio 3 місяці тому

      @@Tigr_Rus Patriot,

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio 3 місяці тому

      @@Tigr_Rus missile defence system.

    • @Tigr_Rus
      @Tigr_Rus 3 місяці тому

      @@BoiStudio 🤣🤣🤣

  • @benmartin6476
    @benmartin6476 11 місяців тому +8

    We’ve only seen partial capability of the former Soviet Union
    Think about that

    • @wadopotato33
      @wadopotato33 10 місяців тому

      AND Russians only had tobsteal the wealth of 140 million people to be that powerful. Let's be honest most of the countries wanted no part of the Soviet Union, but were forced to give up both their wealth and intellectual property to something they did not believe in.
      You think Poles like Russians...Czechs? Nah. Russians had to steal wealth to gain power.

    • @SnakePliskin762
      @SnakePliskin762 4 місяці тому

      They where 💩

  • @ironhorse6688
    @ironhorse6688 Рік тому +42

    The Avangard hypersonic missile will bring the United States to the negotiation table to cut a deal

    • @denchar1741
      @denchar1741 Рік тому +2

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @tu1469
      @tu1469 Рік тому +10

      And this time Russia will do what america did and not want to negotiate anymore and say “you had your many chances son Sam”

    • @ninetysnano6071
      @ninetysnano6071 Рік тому

      These missiles are not new……..Putin showed them off to Trump in 2018 when he visited Russia. You all just live under a rock.

    • @lascm5237
      @lascm5237 Рік тому +5

      … a deal on what exactly? Everyone else was minding their own business before Russia started their 3 day Special Operation in an independent sovereign country 😂

    • @perrycarditi5
      @perrycarditi5 Рік тому

      ⁠@@lascm5237what kind of black hole do you live in? You seriously think Russia just woke up one day and decided to go into ukrain? By the way that 3 day BS was all from the US government and their simps. The US installed a puppet government in Ukraine back in 2014 then started arming it. Both sides, Dems and precious little Donald J Trump as well. Our current cackling VP went to Ukraine and said we want Ukraine Nato. This has long been a red line for Russia. Consider for a minute if Russia had one the same with Mexico or Canada and installed a hostile puppet government to build arms on the US border. Get educated. US is the trouble maker, we are the baddies.

  • @riadhmarsaoui3018
    @riadhmarsaoui3018 7 місяців тому +1

    Please verify the weight of the missile

  • @centralmediachannel-cmc3219
    @centralmediachannel-cmc3219 11 місяців тому +13

    Russia must be the greatest power among all.

  • @askyalumumba3573
    @askyalumumba3573 3 місяці тому +5

    Russian ballistic engineers are 20 years ahead of NATO's .

  • @zafir7007
    @zafir7007 4 місяці тому +2

    Just 6 days ago, this missile system was almost deployed to targets in the UK.

  • @Marcelomedeiros76
    @Marcelomedeiros76 Рік тому +9

    Excellent explanation!

  • @gouravmisra2317
    @gouravmisra2317 Рік тому +29

    Excellent 👌👌

    • @fathead1343
      @fathead1343 Рік тому

      You an orphan, hi look for a daddy instead of this little missy!

  • @lantanonlesiba6556
    @lantanonlesiba6556 Рік тому +39

    USA has started farting with fear

    • @frozenllama23
      @frozenllama23 Рік тому +1

      Ya we're shaking 😂 us has a new nucular weapon

    • @moonZe_konZa
      @moonZe_konZa Рік тому +3

      ​@@frozenllama23yea US have hypersonic missiles but they are still not operational yet 😂

    • @chimeremezelove1041
      @chimeremezelove1041 11 місяців тому

      ​@@moonZe_konZano they don't 😂

    • @sdinim8695
      @sdinim8695 11 місяців тому +6

      @@moonZe_konZathey tested and failed miserably 😂

  • @benmartin6476
    @benmartin6476 11 місяців тому +6

    We haven’t seen Russias capability yet
    I hope we never do

    • @mapachoshaman4859
      @mapachoshaman4859 11 місяців тому +1

      All they have is powerful psychological war techniques ( propaganda ) to make you think they are superpower. Unfortunately for them, they are not. Ukraine conflict is a proof of that.

  • @paulroberts7429
    @paulroberts7429 10 місяців тому +7

    You have to give it to Russia they are 20yrs ahead of America on science, nuclear-powered Hypersonic glide missile with nuclear warhead with unlimited range, Russia also have a nuclear powered doomsday torpedo called Poseidon, Poseidon as a yield of 100mt and is built to create tsunamis 1000ft high to flood Nato's coastal nukes, its is deployed on the 700ft titanium submarine k-329 Belgorod.

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio 9 місяців тому +1

      This missile in particular the Avanguard (I don’t care to get the spelling right) it does not meet the criteria to be a hypersonic missile.

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio 9 місяців тому +1

      It can also be intercepted by the AEGIS system deployed by the United States.

    • @Mr71paul71
      @Mr71paul71 4 місяці тому +2

      I'd say more like 40 years ahead of the western world

    • @paulroberts7429
      @paulroberts7429 4 місяці тому

      @@Mr71paul71 well if we go off Venus, Russia is still the only nation to land a working probe 50yrs ago, closed cycle oxygen rich rocket engines, 700ft titanium sub, these technologies are all linked by exotic titanium blend.

    • @poika22
      @poika22 3 місяці тому

      "Russia they are 20yrs ahead of America on science" like 20% of Russians don't have running water in their homes.

  • @derryjones1029
    @derryjones1029 7 місяців тому +3

    It kills me is they actually spent years preparing for this war instead of trying to stop it

    • @Tonik-13
      @Tonik-13 7 місяців тому +1

      Who do you mean?

  • @angelrapallo-gz4sh
    @angelrapallo-gz4sh Рік тому +6

    Well that's how Flash defeats his enemies .flash controls the time .

  • @diegoflores9237
    @diegoflores9237 Рік тому +14

    There should be buffer countries between nato and Russia. These countries would be demilitarized and neutral. And this should be demanded by every country because in case of nuclear war every country is going to be affected.

    • @michaelillingworth6433
      @michaelillingworth6433 Рік тому +1

      You do realise that there are no countries between East Russia and Alaska. Just a few miles of ocean.

    • @ФаридШарипов-л9у
      @ФаридШарипов-л9у Рік тому +3

      ​@@michaelillingworth6433
      Аляске пора вернуться в родную гавань :)

    • @dairymoon7571
      @dairymoon7571 Рік тому

      Nope. 120 million people don’t want to be Russian slaves.

    • @Orbital_Inclination
      @Orbital_Inclination Рік тому +2

      There used to be neutral nations between them, and then Russia invaded Ukraine

    • @Really250
      @Really250 Рік тому

      ​@@Orbital_Inclinationreally pretty sure the US over threw the government of Ukraine.

  • @johnweerasinghe4139
    @johnweerasinghe4139 4 місяці тому

    Have they made enough though?

  • @darrenluck2612
    @darrenluck2612 11 місяців тому +4

    USA need to treat Russia and China with a bit more respect

    • @gabegaram6047
      @gabegaram6047 10 місяців тому

      In the end they will. China can repopulate Usa about 4x and still have people left at home to make diner .

  • @jasoncrouzat7509
    @jasoncrouzat7509 11 місяців тому +2

    Does anybody remember that movie 19 that was released in 1984 war games that's what World War III is going to look like

  • @mtx_go5391
    @mtx_go5391 10 місяців тому +2

    If this is what they show. Then what power are they hiding

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio 9 місяців тому

      Nothing, that’s why for the past 40 years Russia was painfully behind in the airforce department trying to hold up to the F-22. America prepared for what Russia said they had and because Russia was lying they ended up way behind America.

  • @GegeDxD
    @GegeDxD Місяць тому

    No cold launch?

  • @Mr71paul71
    @Mr71paul71 4 місяці тому +1

    Why hasn't Great Britain got such weapons? Its a national disgrace that British leaders have not allowed our armed forces to keep pace in such things!!!!!

    • @Orbital_Inclination
      @Orbital_Inclination 4 місяці тому

      Because our missile doctrine doesn't include land-based ICBMs. We have subs for that, and aircraft for the rest.

  • @uchungnguyen7686
    @uchungnguyen7686 2 місяці тому

    Tuyệt Đỉnh Lắm 🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤

  • @ambrogiogatti3429
    @ambrogiogatti3429 10 місяців тому +3

    NO NATO = NO WAR
    NO USA= NO WAR

  • @bretingebritson7684
    @bretingebritson7684 Рік тому

    I ask questions on here obviously just the same of does communications go up to satellite from pole with airways airwaves airwaste? And bounce old own to the antennas? Or do the go through the ground ccp and to devices for you folks?

  • @simonworthington-eyre3525
    @simonworthington-eyre3525 9 місяців тому +1

    Russia is at least 2 decades ahead of the US in terms of missile technology!

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio 9 місяців тому

      They are 40 years behind………

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio 9 місяців тому

      Russia is 40 years behind

  • @centralmediachannel-cmc3219
    @centralmediachannel-cmc3219 11 місяців тому +2

    the west must see it and be careful dealing with Russia

  • @tmilholin7552
    @tmilholin7552 4 місяці тому

    What is this new missile that russia is working on that nears mach 50?

  • @707ststudioru7
    @707ststudioru7 3 місяці тому +1

    Это не авангард а ПРО "Нудоль" ( Авангард это гиперзвуковая Планирующая боеголовка МБР "Сармат")

  • @adisusanto3127
    @adisusanto3127 Рік тому +2

    Everything have their own protection for loving things

  • @HanabangIrawan-nu7uo
    @HanabangIrawan-nu7uo 11 місяців тому

    Which country can stop this weapon ?!

  • @clb8242
    @clb8242 2 місяці тому

    Never underestimate your enemy…..

  • @Mark_Thackeray
    @Mark_Thackeray Рік тому +1

    I thought the Patriot missiles used by the Ukrainians shot down some hypersonic missiles launched by Russia?

    • @Артем.А-ъ3щ
      @Артем.А-ъ3щ Рік тому

      😂

    • @gautheuil6210
      @gautheuil6210 11 місяців тому

      Yes and no, they did shoot down the Kinzhals, however it is not an "hypersonic" missile in the modern sense of the term.

    • @вадимвагнер-п4ф
      @вадимвагнер-п4ф 11 місяців тому

      😂 Это пыль по сравнению с царь бомбой посмотри что это.🫵😎🇷🇺

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio 9 місяців тому

      @@gautheuil6210yeah, and this thing isn’t a hypersonic either, by definition.

    • @gautheuil6210
      @gautheuil6210 9 місяців тому

      @@BoiStudio The Avangard? If what the russians say about it is true (big "if", I know) then it's an hypersonic glide vehicle.

  • @jzubav2971
    @jzubav2971 Рік тому

    Nice stuff😮

  • @northok2601
    @northok2601 Рік тому +2

    RUSIA: El impacto avisara su éxito o no … quien quiere ser el primero?

  • @fast_harmonic_psychedelic
    @fast_harmonic_psychedelic Рік тому +3

    Also never mind the fact that even the standard ICBMs were beyond US ability to defend against. The US can't shoot ICBMs down. Maybe 1, or 2. Thats it.. let that sink in...

    • @Doonit_hard_way_since_65
      @Doonit_hard_way_since_65 3 місяці тому

      the system is called THAAD, it's been around for a while, the USA just sent one to Israel. Your information is old, and wrong.

    • @fast_harmonic_psychedelic
      @fast_harmonic_psychedelic 3 місяці тому

      @@Doonit_hard_way_since_65 thaad is a very inferior system it wont work. iti s entirely symbolic, an expensive nothing burger. money laundering

    • @fast_harmonic_psychedelic
      @fast_harmonic_psychedelic 3 місяці тому

      @@Doonit_hard_way_since_65 it works against less than half of known TEST targets limited in scope where the test missiles ewere already known about in advance

    • @Doonit_hard_way_since_65
      @Doonit_hard_way_since_65 3 місяці тому

      @@fast_harmonic_psychedelic No one has anything even close.
      Considering Russia has had 4 out of the last 5 missiles they tried to launch, actually detonate on the launch pad. I don't think they are much to worry about.
      Ru hardware doesn't work right. All that western-sourced electronics seems to be a bit buggy for them.

    • @fast_harmonic_psychedelic
      @fast_harmonic_psychedelic 3 місяці тому

      @@Doonit_hard_way_since_65 you have it backwards. russia is winning the war for all their "buggyiness" they seem to be winning against 50 western countries

  • @tmac20031
    @tmac20031 Місяць тому

    If people really think the US doesnt have far superior weapons and deterants, you havent been paying attention. You dont hear about US capability until 50 years later when its safe to declassify.

  • @TonyL-gw4qx
    @TonyL-gw4qx Рік тому +10

    You don’t see the USA or any Western Country deploying weapons like this anywhere!!!

  • @dr.tahirahmed.n125
    @dr.tahirahmed.n125 4 місяці тому

    grand presentation.

  • @MrWhiskers65
    @MrWhiskers65 7 місяців тому

    How can anyone claim “un-intercept-able”?… you don’t know that!

    • @societyreborn33
      @societyreborn33 6 місяців тому

      Highly maneuverable at mach 27 is currently unstoppable

    • @SnakePliskin762
      @SnakePliskin762 4 місяці тому

      ​@@societyreborn33 in theory

  • @serbianforestman
    @serbianforestman Рік тому +3

    This can only safe The World of western madnees.

  • @daudifungo5521
    @daudifungo5521 11 місяців тому +1

    Let Us Move the Operation
    Now Is the Time

    • @SnakePliskin762
      @SnakePliskin762 4 місяці тому

      End most life on earth on both sides? Sounds intelligent

  • @eugeneprice9004
    @eugeneprice9004 Місяць тому

    33,,000 km per hour

  • @electronicsmotovlog
    @electronicsmotovlog 10 місяців тому +1

    Bravo Russia💪💪💪❤️

  • @SammyMaina-ru9bl
    @SammyMaina-ru9bl 8 місяців тому +1

    Now these are what we call weapons of mass destruction 😢😢😢😢,not what Saddam Sein Possessed.😮😮

  • @omkardhange2310
    @omkardhange2310 Рік тому

    I nvr thought a missile will be this big..

  • @darkdata5510
    @darkdata5510 Рік тому

    Light can be a wave or a particle... lasers waves = solution ..??.

    • @gabegaram6047
      @gabegaram6047 10 місяців тому

      Did you ever try to flashlight a buzzing fly in the kitchen in the dark....? I'm just asking ..

  • @ahmadsaleh2819
    @ahmadsaleh2819 Рік тому

    Does these have radiation?

    • @вадимвагнер-п4ф
      @вадимвагнер-п4ф 11 місяців тому

      Да

    • @nabawi7
      @nabawi7 10 місяців тому

      if it has a nuclear warhead then yeah

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio 9 місяців тому

      @@nabawi7but nuclear weapons don’t have the same effect as reactor explosions so it’s far less catastrophic to the area hit. The worst part about the explosion is the blast itself.

  • @steveabdelkoui5663
    @steveabdelkoui5663 10 місяців тому

    It can also glide without fuel. Says enough.

  • @societyreborn33
    @societyreborn33 6 місяців тому

    Its literally a space rocket With a nuclear MRV inside 🤔 absolutely insane

    • @poika22
      @poika22 3 місяці тому

      That's what all ICBMs are. Including the very first one. It was literally dual purpose for deploying satellites or carrying nuclear warheads.

    • @societyreborn33
      @societyreborn33 3 місяці тому

      @@poika22 mrv re-entry vehicles are what separates modern hypersonics from traditional icbms
      Only a few countries have battle tested/functional inventory of such tech

  • @AlbertoRossi-rs5dl
    @AlbertoRossi-rs5dl 10 місяців тому

    I sistemi missilistici RUSSI, sono FENOMENALI!

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 7 місяців тому

    They are so powerful this missile

  • @Indiana_Jones-h5l
    @Indiana_Jones-h5l Рік тому +3

    The US won’t show its cards until it needs to.

    • @qwertqwerty5764
      @qwertqwerty5764 Рік тому +1

      Конечно, какой смысл, когда нет козырей.

    • @Bhekindlovu6823
      @Bhekindlovu6823 11 місяців тому +2

      They don't have cards papa
      Russia knows them more than you think

    • @chimeremezelove1041
      @chimeremezelove1041 11 місяців тому

      ​@@Bhekindlovu6823 I swear, Vladimir Putin is the most informed president in the whole world

    • @nabawi7
      @nabawi7 10 місяців тому +1

      Not when the DoD admitted it doesnt have a defence for this missile.

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio 9 місяців тому

      @@nabawi7they do, it’s called the AEGIS missile defence system.

  • @dwayneroberts6616
    @dwayneroberts6616 Рік тому +2

    There are hypersonic anti missile's already being armed on Japanese subs😂

  • @tomascastillo4676
    @tomascastillo4676 2 місяці тому +1

    This is why the US cannot deliver democracy and human rights to Russia 😄

  • @JOzzie-u8z
    @JOzzie-u8z 10 місяців тому

    Okay the. Why do all the missiles you keep showing us are soviet era so they were cutting edge in the 1960s

  • @avisaviss3245
    @avisaviss3245 11 місяців тому

    This pipeline missle is very accurate 😂

  • @bvv1712
    @bvv1712 Рік тому

    Авангард это страшное оружие! Континенты раскалывает на части

  • @rusty90272
    @rusty90272 Рік тому +1

    Yes, they are.

  • @OneVoce
    @OneVoce 4 місяці тому

    Very impressed

  • @centralmediachannel-cmc3219
    @centralmediachannel-cmc3219 11 місяців тому

    you are right and good to show all true .

  • @MuhammadYusuf-zz4di
    @MuhammadYusuf-zz4di Рік тому +2

    Lets do it

  • @CesitarLabarthe
    @CesitarLabarthe 10 місяців тому

    Why don’t you say that the United States broke the two other treatments about short and medium distance nuclear weapons??? you

  • @HanabangIrawan-nu7uo
    @HanabangIrawan-nu7uo 11 місяців тому

    Avangard is the best nuke weapon from russia , the hyper in more than 27 mach

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio 9 місяців тому

      27 was the cap, as in it can’t go faster

  • @vladimirm7622
    @vladimirm7622 8 місяців тому

    The USSR was extremely strong militarily, but it was destroyed from the inside, technology is not a guarantee of victory

  • @mattmugno6277
    @mattmugno6277 10 місяців тому +2

    I think it is bs. It cant out run a laser. Speed of light wins. As long as you can achieve radar lock you can lead it.

  • @Paul-th9es
    @Paul-th9es Рік тому +1

    I dont think anything beyond set speed can re-direct. The acting forces at mach 10 plus. It doesnt make sense. A drag car thats going 120 mph, and loses control, though its off course, its still tumbling in set direction, now speed that up 5000 percent, there is no re direct. The data collected, if possible can perdict its target. Mach 20 is insane, but with the right tools may be more predictable.

  • @Gumiho-34
    @Gumiho-34 11 місяців тому

    They couldn’t even intercept what more of avangard 🤦‍♂️

  • @user-ds2el6kx1h
    @user-ds2el6kx1h Рік тому +1

    Цаным Руссия адалати барпа ет дунйаны дагыт

  • @Exodus000191
    @Exodus000191 Рік тому +2

    If it even exists.

  • @petrovich0437
    @petrovich0437 Рік тому

    Почему ракету Сармат (Сатана-2) называют Авангардом?

    • @alexanderchepak2009
      @alexanderchepak2009 10 місяців тому

      Никто ее так не называет.

    • @petrovich0437
      @petrovich0437 10 місяців тому

      @@alexanderchepak2009 Сармат никто не называет Сарматом? Отсыпь, а?😂

    • @alexanderchepak2009
      @alexanderchepak2009 10 місяців тому

      @@petrovich0437 сармат и авангард - два РАЗНЫХ комплекса.

    • @petrovich0437
      @petrovich0437 10 місяців тому

      @@alexanderchepak2009 и в чём их отличие?😂

    • @alexanderchepak2009
      @alexanderchepak2009 10 місяців тому

      @@petrovich0437 ракеты совершено разные. Абсолютно разные. Авангард на основе Стилета, Сармат новая тяжелая ракета.

  • @rtmpxr
    @rtmpxr 4 місяці тому +1

    Maneuvering at 20-27 Mach?
    Detecting AA when covered by plasma?
    Bullshit russian propaganda :)

  • @aldyfaishal883
    @aldyfaishal883 Місяць тому

    Avangard mach-27, fastest missile on earth

  • @apakansaja8505
    @apakansaja8505 Рік тому

    *No more silo... everything moves with all the art of deceptions being used.*

    • @r0mi44
      @r0mi44 Рік тому

      he's not showing you comics

  • @ghullammohiyuddin1940
    @ghullammohiyuddin1940 Рік тому

    Informative..Enjoy

  • @sadatzaman3511
    @sadatzaman3511 Рік тому

    This" Nudol" not "Avanguard".

    • @r0mi44
      @r0mi44 Рік тому

      I don’t understand what’s going on anymore, they crossed a bulldog with a rhinoceros 😆😅

    • @r0mi44
      @r0mi44 Рік тому

      may have accelerated the launch into orbit hypersound

  • @FreeRussia-ov5pu
    @FreeRussia-ov5pu Рік тому +4

    Почему никого здесь не смущает что на таких скоростях вокруг "Авангарда" образуется плазменный кокон не позволяющие ему принимать сигналы и ориентироваться в пространстве как он должен попасть в цель особенно если она движется?

    • @shprotos4724
      @shprotos4724 Рік тому +15

      Кто движется? Этим не по зайцам стреляют, а по городам. Они большие и не двигаются, а инерциальные системы наведения тоже на месте не стояли последние десятилетия

    • @borhardtluger
      @borhardtluger Рік тому +1

      😁

    • @НикитаСамсонов-с6ю
      @НикитаСамсонов-с6ю Рік тому +6

      Ну так инженеры когда сделали посейдон, с его водным пузырем, справедливо задумались а не прокатит ли такая же тема, но уже с пузырем плазменным. Сам авангард и генерирует этот кокон, походу это и позволяет набирать такую скорость. Помню еще заявляли, что смогли каким то там хе.. чудом, реализовать систему связи через этот плазменный пузырь. Теоритически это возможно, хотя бы потому что сама плазма может выступать в роли антенны. Может и по другому как то, хрен его знает, секретная инфа же.

    • @KGAnims
      @KGAnims Рік тому +4

      Загружают в бортовой компьютер карту мира, по ней и летит при помощи инерциальной системы. Да, она не совсем точна (отклонение 500м примерно макс), но для ракеты типа этой это не так критично.

    • @АндрейИванов-б4о6т
      @АндрейИванов-б4о6т Рік тому +3

      Электронная карта местности заложенная в блок управления.

  • @dawkdog666
    @dawkdog666 Рік тому +1

    Can't remember voting for this a revolution is so well needed

    • @FightingSatan
      @FightingSatan 11 місяців тому

      Did you ever truly think your vote mattered?

  • @backbrown3366
    @backbrown3366 Рік тому +1

    Reshaping military dynamics. Must be because they made it pointy 😂.

  • @EstebanSerra-sc8tq
    @EstebanSerra-sc8tq Рік тому +3

    Russia the Mother of Rockets

    • @alexxxXXXrus
      @alexxxXXXrus Рік тому

      China makes first ever military rockets almost 500 years ago

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio 9 місяців тому

      @@alexxxXXXrusand then the United States proceeded to lead in missile tech after that.

  • @chatsoon6802
    @chatsoon6802 10 місяців тому +1

    this still a joke for west, untill Russian provided the test report with english language for them to verify.

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio 9 місяців тому +1

      You do realise that this missile was Russia copying the US sprint missile and other US designs made in the 70s right?

    • @MarleyMonet
      @MarleyMonet 3 місяці тому

      @@BoiStudioCope harder maleek

    • @BoiStudio
      @BoiStudio 3 місяці тому

      @@MarleyMonet I don’t need to cope, Russia advertising these missiles as “better than the west” is wrong, and America is developing several missiles and launchers that are hypersonic to *put in service* not develop, to put in service.

    • @MarleyMonet
      @MarleyMonet 3 місяці тому

      @@BoiStudio whatever Russia does is always bad you can keep making yourself feel better about your opinion USA or their puppet dare not to mess with Russia like they are doing with other country Russia is not in the middle east or Africa or Asia Russia is the eyes of this planet get the fact into your head if the west act funny then it’s over for everyone including you no one gonna escape that

  • @Hoyllandgeorge-qc5uz
    @Hoyllandgeorge-qc5uz Рік тому

    May be not but they wouldn’t take any chances !!!

  • @andylake3230
    @andylake3230 4 місяці тому

    Its impressive, however, its a real pity humanity sees fit to spend so much on defence and war with each other, instead of improving the lives of all and protecting our natural environment. I find all global leaders pretty pathetic and childish.

    • @GODS_OUTLAW
      @GODS_OUTLAW 3 місяці тому

      Ya to bad the shoes fuck everything up