yes most of history was far right - do we really want to go back to brutality, being peasants owned by kings, queens, kings, Lords etc - if progress means anything it means we're moving away from these oppressive, controlling, abusive dead old days. Does Curtis crave a crown or a fools hat?
Massive advances and achievements an achievements were made in those days and there were times more ancient than that when people were slaves to cold hunger and rampaging tribes, those were the problems the Kingdoms worked to solve. And do we want to progress forwards into a DEI future where we are all equally enslaved by a non-human machine? Say what you like about a monarchy but at least the King was a human.
I am a so-called far right person because I am a Paleo conservative but it really means the people who want to have your traditional marriage and your traditional culture
so you missed his opening statement about how most of history was far right? meaning we were ruled and brutalised by kings, queens, Lords and lived as abused peasants. Yarvin craves either a crown or a jesters hat, he's a monarchist lover.
@@futures2247 the opening few chapters in one of his books about the American Revolution is hilarious. The bootlicking is extreme for somebody that would be a peasant.
Our fisheye lens view of history is a very important point. It is incredibly rare for a leftist to refer to anything that happened before 1939, usually they won't go back before 1969. It is very different in China. The idea that you could be a leader without a deep understanding of Confucius is absurd. And Confucius himself was studying and talking about leaders from much further back in history, right to the Neolithic period in fact.
The Hair Stream.
The Lord Farquad Lev cut is buried 6 feet under now.
@@breakth3rules who are you, Comrade? Grow some testicles.
Stephen Wright has let himself go.
yes most of history was far right - do we really want to go back to brutality, being peasants owned by kings, queens, kings, Lords etc - if progress means anything it means we're moving away from these oppressive, controlling, abusive dead old days. Does Curtis crave a crown or a fools hat?
Massive advances and achievements an achievements were made in those days and there were times more ancient than that when people were slaves to cold hunger and rampaging tribes, those were the problems the Kingdoms worked to solve.
And do we want to progress forwards into a DEI future where we are all equally enslaved by a non-human machine?
Say what you like about a monarchy but at least the King was a human.
you're owned right now, pal. you kidding me?
@@areyoutheregoditsmedave I know which era in which i'd prefer to live.
@futures2247 Modern governments are much more tyrannical and oppressive than any fuxking Monarch in the west. Stfu Libshit.
You must really enjoy the oligarch spit roast
I appear to have been silenced by the leftist Gestapo. Get well soon, Comrade.
I'm surprised they allowed this comment
Keep fighting the good fight
@ my first critique disappeared quicker than Scotch Mist. Interesting. 🤔
I can't see my rational objective comment either 🤷♀️
When you know you know, you know?
99% of history was far-right? That's the most uninformed view of history I've ever heard, arguably.
It's where the right meets the far left in the REAR!!! 😅😊😂
I am a so-called far right person because I am a Paleo conservative but it really means the people who want to have your traditional marriage and your traditional culture
so you missed his opening statement about how most of history was far right? meaning we were ruled and brutalised by kings, queens, Lords and lived as abused peasants. Yarvin craves either a crown or a jesters hat, he's a monarchist lover.
@@futures2247 the opening few chapters in one of his books about the American Revolution is hilarious. The bootlicking is extreme for somebody that would be a peasant.
Yarvin is completely astroturfed.
Yarvin has an unmatched ability to put words together and say nothing beyond some simpleton's take.
Hair dye alert
Our fisheye lens view of history is a very important point.
It is incredibly rare for a leftist to refer to anything that happened before 1939, usually they won't go back before 1969.
It is very different in China. The idea that you could be a leader without a deep understanding of Confucius is absurd. And Confucius himself was studying and talking about leaders from much further back in history, right to the Neolithic period in fact.
That's not true if they are aware of labor history, which most semi-serious leftists are.
@@cyberpunkalphamale Deep history is poisonous to a leftist.
Evolution and evolutionary psychology is anathema to the leftist project.
I can't tell if I'm having a brain aneurysm while listening to him speak or not. Simply impossible to tell.
Excruciating.. his speach assumes youre in his head. All i get is a headache
What is far right? Definitely none of these dudes.
Have you had post election Curtis on yet?
I’m so done w Yarvin get it off my feed
Northern European
11 comments, but I can only see 9
🤔
Language games indeed
Just say ennward