Thats kind of what I expected. The Dizio is very clean but the Cook has better falloff and a little more character. Although for most normal people the Dizio is probably the better bet.
I don't know which is the most expensive because it doesn't specify in the video, but the big difference I notice is in the movement of its lenses and how it gives that sensation of organic refocus, as we see at minute 2:43 In "Lens A", it is like looking through the view of a real person or animal while "Lens B" shows that it is only a mechanism that moves the focus of the lenses backwards or forwards.
@@brxtn13 I mean the price, I had to search online for their prices to find out which one is more expensive, but in short, I liked the cheap one better xD
I tried to be objective when viewing these, as I already own some Vespid primes...but I actually prefer the Vespid primes for these dark interior shots. I would like to see a similar comparison with skin tones and exterior shots. That's where the Cooke primes really shine. The Cooke primes have a nicer contrast, but only when I compare them side by side. I'm more pleased with the color of the Vespid primes.
Set B is a clear winner to me, but depending on what you film and how you showcase it, it might not be worth the price difference. If you shoot people, close up of faces for a narrative film with proper lighting, that's where Cooke starts making sense. Too expensive to buy, but okay to rent.
There's no comparison, it's 10 times the price. I'd still consider if it's 2-3 times, but 10? Get the $1399 and the rest for better body, gears, filters and accessories
Probably better practice to just save and rent expensesive lenses when you need them.. I don't understand everyone's obsession with buying lens sets doesn't really make a lot of sense. But yes if you're going to actually buy a set you should absolutely buy a cheaper set like the DZO's or the SLR magic hyper primes or even the Dulens APOs for personal lower end professional use.
Thats kind of what I expected. The Dizio is very clean but the Cook has better falloff and a little more character. Although for most normal people the Dizio is probably the better bet.
I don't know which is the most expensive because it doesn't specify in the video, but the big difference I notice is in the movement of its lenses
and how it gives that sensation of organic refocus, as we see at minute 2:43
In "Lens A", it is like looking through the view of a real person or animal
while "Lens B" shows that it is only a mechanism that moves the focus of the lenses backwards or forwards.
@@brxtn13 I mean the price, I had to search online for their prices to find out which one is more expensive, but in short, I liked the cheap one better xD
I can actually see that, too. That said, it’s close :)
Lens A) is dzo and B) is cooke
I knew immediately because of the color/contrast. I wish I didn’t love the Cooke haha.
Hey, its me or the DZO is more consistent? Also, better handling of focus breathing
The minimal to non existent focus breathing is crazy
I actually prefered the DZO Vespid
I tried to be objective when viewing these, as I already own some Vespid primes...but I actually prefer the Vespid primes for these dark interior shots. I would like to see a similar comparison with skin tones and exterior shots. That's where the Cooke primes really shine. The Cooke primes have a nicer contrast, but only when I compare them side by side. I'm more pleased with the color of the Vespid primes.
wow...I thought the bokeh looked better on the DZO. less onion rings and out of shape bubbles.
B looks more elegant... But these tests don't mean shit without skin tone
I like "B" as it feels organic overall (like the tube light), and "A" feels clinical/sterile, not that that is bad to look that way but.
hard to spot a real noticeable difference on UA-cam 720p, to be honest...
Set B is a clear winner to me, but depending on what you film and how you showcase it, it might not be worth the price difference.
If you shoot people, close up of faces for a narrative film with proper lighting, that's where Cooke starts making sense. Too expensive to buy, but okay to rent.
I thought A was sharper and had a more pleasing color. The lesson here is - Cooke is toast.
Going with B as Cooke. Still watching,
Dammit! I was hoping I was wrong.
There's no comparison, it's 10 times the price. I'd still consider if it's 2-3 times, but 10? Get the $1399 and the rest for better body, gears, filters and accessories
Probably better practice to just save and rent expensesive lenses when you need them.. I don't understand everyone's obsession with buying lens sets doesn't really make a lot of sense. But yes if you're going to actually buy a set you should absolutely buy a cheaper set like the DZO's or the SLR magic hyper primes or even the Dulens APOs for personal lower end professional use.
Crazy! The dzo breath less
Damnit! Of course I preferred the more expensive one.....😢😂