I played brilliant a lot of times when i was 600 atleast 20-30 those were all opening brilliant moves though I just memorised a few lines of some openings its actually good to know how to punish some dumb openings
It used to be (idk how many years ago) that a Brilliant move was when you briefly played even better than Stockfish. Nowadays it just means you made a move that looked terrible at first glance but was actually kind of good.
Hi there. You probably were already wondering where I was. Don't worry, I haven't forgotten about you: 0:25 It's the Queen's Gambit. The main responses against it are dxc4 (Queen's Gambit accepted), e6 (Queen's Gambit declined [QGD]) and c6 (Slav Defense)]. 0:34 On your level (and probably mine too) it is not that important, but this is a slight strategic mistake here. One of the most important resources for black in the Queen's Gambit is the pawn move c5 to attack and undermine the white center. Developing the knight normally here blocks this pawn. Therefore it is better to either wait until you could get c5 in (without blundering that pawn obviously) or develop the knight to d7, where the knight supports the c-pawn once it is pushed. As I said, not so relevant on lower levels, where most games are decided but blunders in the middlegame, but maybe good to keep in mind still. 1:50 and there is the decisive blunder I was talking about that makes these slight mistakes not really important on the beginner level. Good find with the sacrifice. 2:51 This is presenting a problem for your opponent, but much like in real wars it is better to present your enemy a dilemma, because problems have solutions (here it is moving or defending the pawn) while dilemmas force the opponent to choose between two (or more) unpleasant possibilities. So Qg2 instead of Qh5 to attack both the rook and the pawn. After Rf1 you can take the pawn. Second Game: Not much to say here that you didn't already talk about. Stop moving your f-pawn so early. At least until you're a couple hundred elo points higher. Congrats to 100 subs btw even though I'm a bit late to the party, It is almost 150 already.
0:25 understood 0:34 Okay, I see. Gotta think more carefully about that knight development so the c-pawn has more freedom in this line. 1:50 Yup, a slight oopsie from the opponent. 2:51 Here he could also go Rh2 I guess and then it doesn't seem too clear to be what should be the next moves 🤔 Second Game: the f-pawn.... Thanks! The support has been insane from everyone. Also thank you again for the analysis and breakdown 👍
Why play without increment? Increment means you don't have to worry about time as much. You still have to manage it, but it's not an auto loss if you run out, you just run into a buffer of a few seconds Much easier to get better if time has some renewability to it and you're not burning it every second you spend thinking
I like the idea that it's auto loss when you run out of time. I've never enjoyed playing with increment idk why. Prolly bcs it's more intense I guess 😅 but like you said probably not the best for learning and becoming better...
hi brother, you're really good, but if I had to say one weakness, it's a little bit of more tactics and strategic chess, sometimes your moves are "null," meaning it either has no threat, or has one but can be easily avoided, in
It is interesting to see chess at lower levels. The good old days of chess. I am at a point where even bullet requires a lot of effort to just to match and outplay your opponent and all the moves being played in 3 seconds max. The rating is 1500. Anyway, you can get higher than 1000 elo, definitely. I got through from 200 elo
I thought I could fork his king and rook by going knight to c2 if he took the bishop, seems like I accidentally cut out that part of me trying to figure it out on the video 😩
KEEP THE GOOD WORK By the way, the brilliant move thing is sometimes a bit broken. I had one for a sequence both me and my oponent saw and my oponent (who got the sacred move) lost few moves afterwards.
Wow, you were right… I really AM questioning everything I know about chess… … apparently having 4 defenders on the f5 pawn is the secret to its immunity to all attacks. So, technically, you can turn yourself into an utterly invincible chess master as long as you have 64 defenders against your 16 pieces! Mind. Totally. Blown. 🤯
since you had a pretty good first game i can tell your problem is not that you are horrible at chess but your impatience, I can clearly see that you get lazy mid way of the thinking and take the worst possible choice that wasn´t even in line with your previous line of thought lol
I don't know if he saw his bishop was hanging, but I'd taken it's a fork, that's why it was brilliant
Yes, it’s a check-rook fork
I played brilliant a lot of times when i was 600 atleast 20-30
those were all opening brilliant moves though
I just memorised a few lines of some openings
its actually good to know how to punish some dumb openings
It used to be (idk how many years ago) that a Brilliant move was when you briefly played even better than Stockfish. Nowadays it just means you made a move that looked terrible at first glance but was actually kind of good.
The point of the brilliant move was infact not that it was to sacrifice the bishop to capture the rook through a fork
Hi there. You probably were already wondering where I was. Don't worry, I haven't forgotten about you:
0:25 It's the Queen's Gambit. The main responses against it are dxc4 (Queen's Gambit accepted), e6 (Queen's Gambit declined [QGD]) and c6 (Slav Defense)].
0:34 On your level (and probably mine too) it is not that important, but this is a slight strategic mistake here. One of the most important resources for black in the Queen's Gambit is the pawn move c5 to attack and undermine the white center. Developing the knight normally here blocks this pawn. Therefore it is better to either wait until you could get c5 in (without blundering that pawn obviously) or develop the knight to d7, where the knight supports the c-pawn once it is pushed. As I said, not so relevant on lower levels, where most games are decided but blunders in the middlegame, but maybe good to keep in mind still.
1:50 and there is the decisive blunder I was talking about that makes these slight mistakes not really important on the beginner level. Good find with the sacrifice.
2:51 This is presenting a problem for your opponent, but much like in real wars it is better to present your enemy a dilemma, because problems have solutions (here it is moving or defending the pawn) while dilemmas force the opponent to choose between two (or more) unpleasant possibilities. So Qg2 instead of Qh5 to attack both the rook and the pawn. After Rf1 you can take the pawn.
Second Game: Not much to say here that you didn't already talk about. Stop moving your f-pawn so early. At least until you're a couple hundred elo points higher.
Congrats to 100 subs btw even though I'm a bit late to the party, It is almost 150 already.
Hi trews! Yes I was full panicking where my "coach" disappeared 😱. Saw your comments and gonna read them carefully when I'm back home 👌
0:25 understood
0:34 Okay, I see. Gotta think more carefully about that knight development so the c-pawn has more freedom in this line.
1:50 Yup, a slight oopsie from the opponent.
2:51 Here he could also go Rh2 I guess and then it doesn't seem too clear to be what should be the next moves 🤔
Second Game: the f-pawn....
Thanks! The support has been insane from everyone.
Also thank you again for the analysis and breakdown 👍
@@IdiotChess1 2:51 even after Rh2 the f3 pawn is still hanging
@@trews1 ah true , his bishop is still on d3 🙃
the bishop hanging:
Yeah, that queen trade was not in your favor. 😂
🙃
Why play without increment? Increment means you don't have to worry about time as much. You still have to manage it, but it's not an auto loss if you run out, you just run into a buffer of a few seconds
Much easier to get better if time has some renewability to it and you're not burning it every second you spend thinking
I like the idea that it's auto loss when you run out of time. I've never enjoyed playing with increment idk why. Prolly bcs it's more intense I guess 😅 but like you said probably not the best for learning and becoming better...
good job on the brilliant, homie!! congrats on 81 subs, you're doing great!! youre on your way to 700 no doubt !!
thanks homie, I can smell the 700 ELO already 👃
A quick tip, maybe turn the volume up as it’s quite hard to hear you. Great video tho :)
Thanks for the feedback! Just got a new mic setup and seems like I need to do little adjusting... Glad you still enjoyed the video 😄
hi brother, you're really good, but if I had to say one weakness, it's a little bit of more tactics and strategic chess, sometimes your moves are "null," meaning it either has no threat, or has one but can be easily avoided, in
hello darkacer and thanks for the tip! 😄
welcome brother:)
It is interesting to see chess at lower levels. The good old days of chess.
I am at a point where even bullet requires a lot of effort to just to match and outplay your opponent and all the moves being played in 3 seconds max. The rating is 1500.
Anyway, you can get higher than 1000 elo, definitely. I got through from 200 elo
Yeah, I can just blunder couple moves and still make a comeback 😂. Not gonna happen in your elo probably.
Thanks for the nice comment!
Why couldn't he just Qxa5?
I thought I could fork his king and rook by going knight to c2 if he took the bishop, seems like I accidentally cut out that part of me trying to figure it out on the video 😩
@@IdiotChess1 yeah you are right. I am blind
@@batatah no worries, I usually don't see these either, I was just having good random 1 game I guess 🤣
@@IdiotChess1Oooohhh ok, thanks for explaining. I was staring at my screen so confused, but now I understand it really was a brilliant move!
@@IdiotChess1The fork would probably only lead to an equal position, but b6 is a nice queen trap which is why it was marked as brilliant
KEEP THE GOOD WORK
By the way, the brilliant move thing is sometimes a bit broken. I had one for a sequence both me and my oponent saw and my oponent (who got the sacred move) lost few moves afterwards.
Wow, you were right…
I really AM questioning everything I know about chess…
… apparently having 4 defenders on the f5 pawn is the secret to its immunity to all attacks. So, technically, you can turn yourself into an utterly invincible chess master as long as you have 64 defenders against your 16 pieces!
Mind. Totally. Blown. 🤯
Yes, no problem. I think I'm reinventing the chess meta. Watch out for me in the chess streets... 😎
Great video! You got a new sub
Thank youu!
since you had a pretty good first game i can tell your problem is not that you are horrible at chess but your impatience, I can clearly see that you get lazy mid way of the thinking and take the worst possible choice that wasn´t even in line with your previous line of thought lol
Yeah, sounds pretty accurate... ADHD kicking in or something 🙃