Messianic Jew Challenges Young Muslim to Prove Bible Has Been Corrupted

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 147

  • @jeffreydsouza7273
    @jeffreydsouza7273 6 місяців тому +12

    how can a god make so much of mistakes in the quran and then call it perfect

  • @ragael1024
    @ragael1024 6 місяців тому +11

    i like how the Quran says the Bible and the Torah are corrupt, but Mohammad used them to make his prophethood legitimate, didn't he? without those Books, he was nothing. so how come they got corrupt?

    • @19Zee
      @19Zee 5 місяців тому

      So the jew who posted the Vedio is lair.

    • @Michiganfan105
      @Michiganfan105 4 місяці тому

      The Quran doesn't say that at all. It actually confirms the authenticity of the Torah and Gospel numerous times. Nowhere in the Quran does it say that the previous scriptures have been corrupted, it only says that Christians and Jews were misinterpreting their scriptures. And that's why it's all the more hilarious each time a Muslim claims that the Bible was corrupted. And not to mention there are several complete or nearly complete Biblical manuscripts in the original Greek that are still intact that predate Islam by several hundred years, proving that there was no "corruption" as Muslims love to claim.

  • @herbies2898
    @herbies2898 5 місяців тому +2

    Thanks to Islam, becoz Islam proove that Bible is True Book! I Bible said there will come a false gospel tht says Jesus was not crucified ---> like Quran said
    The Bible is True Book

  • @lesliewilliam3777
    @lesliewilliam3777 6 місяців тому +2

    The Muslim guy, in his opening gambit, says that you have to understand the context. Now, "his" context lies outside the Qur'an. But I thought that the Qur'an was clear, easily understood and was a correction to the supposed distortions that had entered Christianity.

  • @outofthebox7
    @outofthebox7 6 місяців тому +4

    Laughable. The Injill was considered by Greek Christians the whole New Testament from before muhammad, during and after him! It was the message of the Good News as found in the NT.
    There was no other Injill at the time of muhammad or anyone else.

  • @opindras.bangerh129
    @opindras.bangerh129 6 місяців тому +1

    Anonymous authors did not write the Injil. All the authors were known by the family of Jesus (John 19: 26-27) and the very first congregation Acts Chapter 2.
    The two Gospel writers John and Matthew knew Jesus both Spiritually and naturally. Mark and Luke were either eye witness or took eye witness statements.
    The Apostles of Jesus; Peter, James & John etc all knew each other as well as the writers of the New Testament.
    Even the Apostle Paul's letters were affirmed by the Apostle Peter (2Peter 3: 15-16).
    The reason why the Injil was written in Koine Greek (and other languages, Ethiopian, Syriac, Latin etc ), was because the will of God was to take the message further than than Israel and the Jews community and into ALL THE WORLD!
    Translations to other languages that could be read and understand by other nations and communities is not a issue with God. The point is, is what is recorded accurate and by trusted sources... something you can not say about the Quran or Muhammad. ❤ ✝️🕊

    • @19Zee
      @19Zee 5 місяців тому

      So you are not sure about the mark and luke and preaching Christianity nice logic. I am sure you are follower of some ...

  • @ZeroCelsius777
    @ZeroCelsius777 6 місяців тому

    At 5:26...the DEAD SEA SCROLLS of ISAIAH are in the MASORETIC TEXT
    However, the SEPTUAGINT, which was written earlier says things different
    Example: Isaiah 42:1 (Septuagint)...👉Jacob is my servant, I will help him: Israel is my chosen,👈 my soul has accepted him; I have put my Spirit upon him; he shall bring forth judgement to the Gentiles.
    Isaiah 42:1 (Masoretic)...Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles.

    • @tempelhoferfeld7727
      @tempelhoferfeld7727 6 місяців тому

      Quran =allah's Word can't be corrupted!
      Muslims =Yes,it can!

    • @lesliewilliam3777
      @lesliewilliam3777 6 місяців тому +1

      "the DEAD SEA SCROLLS of ISAIAH are in the MASORETIC TEXT"?
      No they aren't.

    • @BillTukana2413
      @BillTukana2413 5 місяців тому

      @ZeroCelsius777 😂😂😂 taqiyya for your pimp god & sex pervert wtb child molester pedophile prophet. Believe stay w Islam. Want to discuss further? 1) breastfeed adults marry kids 2) sex & divorce kids who haven't reach puberty 3) who wrote the Qur'an 4) etc. Where is the original manuscripts of Islam, or the 7 Qur'an that were given to that illiterate sex pervert wtb prophet?

  • @johnmccarron
    @johnmccarron 6 місяців тому

    He has Heard of Jesus so he should believe, it is his choice.

  • @user-vl8iw1666
    @user-vl8iw1666 6 місяців тому

    Here is proof: they changed his name

  • @NoOne-ze7fv
    @NoOne-ze7fv 6 місяців тому +2

    God didn’t drop in to write any of these so-called holy books,men wrote them, so your blind faith in these writings is just stupid!

    • @davidjanbaz7728
      @davidjanbaz7728 6 місяців тому

      Christians don't claim God wrote the Bible : He's the author through the Holy Spirit that gave Divine inspiration to the Biblical writers.
      Your blind Faith that Nonintelligence created the Universe is more irrational.
      Get educated before making ignorant statements.

    • @davidjanbaz7728
      @davidjanbaz7728 6 місяців тому

      Your ignorance is obvious: God is the author NOT the writers .
      Get educated: your blind Faith in nonintelligence creating the Universe is more irrational.

    • @KerussotheKingdom
      @KerussotheKingdom  6 місяців тому

      Are you of the religion of atheism?

    • @KerussotheKingdom
      @KerussotheKingdom  6 місяців тому +1

      Atheism is the most ridiculous religion of all religions. 100% faith in theories no proof

  • @osuclassof88
    @osuclassof88 6 місяців тому +1

    which part of quran is burnt?

    • @zz-wv2sh
      @zz-wv2sh 6 місяців тому

      the companions all had different qurans, the caliphate wanted to standardized it so he compiled all of the qurans and left all but the one he picked and burnt the rest

    • @beautymakeuplovesosa
      @beautymakeuplovesosa 6 місяців тому

      @@zz-wv2shit was uthman who did it. Here is the context and reasoning behind his action: What Uthman (RA) did do was that he set up a committee to compile the Quran in the order that it was intended and in the correct Ahruf. The Quran was originally revealed in seven different Ahruf (meaning modes of recitation) and one of them was later made the correct one. The Prophet (SAW) (with the help of Jibril (AS) who was repeating the copy in heaven) had every Ramadan recited the whole Quran in its correct order in front of the people, this order being the one Uthman (RA) wanted to preserve.
      But, the many scribes that wrote down the verses of the Quran in the Prophet (SAW)’s time did so in chronological order and in their own tribe's Hurf. Furthermore, many of the scribes used their copies of the Quran as personal notebooks for recording all matters of religion. So, they would record the hadith of the Prophet (SAW) explaining one of the verses in the margins or a clarification of a certain ruling etc. They were within their rights to do so, but as Uthman (RA) realized, the individual writers may know what part is the hadith and what part is the Quran in their books, but any other person would confuse the two. It was also realized and experienced that the people were mistaking the old Ahruf as the real Quran. Also most written copies weren’t even full copies of the Quran. This could have led to many problems or confusions later on regarding the Quran.

    • @KerussotheKingdom
      @KerussotheKingdom  6 місяців тому

      No one will ever know
      Sahih al-Bukhari 4987
      Narrated Anas bin Malik:
      Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to `Uthman at the time when the people of Sham and the people of Iraq were Waging war to conquer Arminya and Adharbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur'an, so he said to `Uthman, "O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Qur'an) as Jews and the Christians did before." So `Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, "Send us the manuscripts of the Qur'an so that we may compile the Qur'anic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you." Hafsa sent it to `Uthman. `Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, `Abdullah bin AzZubair, Sa`id bin Al-As and `AbdurRahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. `Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, "In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Qur'an, then write it in the dialect of Quraish, the Qur'an was revealed in their tongue." They did so, and when they had written many copies, `Uthman returned the original manuscripts to Hafsa. `Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied, and ordered that all the other Qur'anic materials, whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt.
      sunnah.com/bukhari:4987

    • @osuclassof88
      @osuclassof88 6 місяців тому

      @@zz-wv2sh where are there?

    • @osuclassof88
      @osuclassof88 6 місяців тому

      @@KerussotheKingdom 😂 good reason not to believe you, very convincing evidence

  • @19Zee
    @19Zee 5 місяців тому

    So now jew also believe in Qur'an. Nice. Finally they are understanding.

    • @KerussotheKingdom
      @KerussotheKingdom  5 місяців тому +1

      Wrong. Muhammad was the most obvious false prophet in history. Quran is full of contradictions and lies.

  • @osuclassof88
    @osuclassof88 6 місяців тому

    which verses command muslims kill unbelievers?

    • @silviahannak3213
      @silviahannak3213 6 місяців тому +1

      Many!! Not just once.

    • @zz-wv2sh
      @zz-wv2sh 6 місяців тому

      surah 9 verse 29

    • @KerussotheKingdom
      @KerussotheKingdom  6 місяців тому

      Read all of chapter 9. 8:59-60, 2:190-191, 5:33-34, 8:60, 47:4

    • @beautymakeuplovesosa
      @beautymakeuplovesosa 6 місяців тому

      @@zz-wv2sh it is completely out of context. If you want to be fair and open-minded, here I will provide a context and explanation, but before I do, please do not take things out of context so they fit your agenda, be fair
      Context:
      You have to take the context, instead of just picking one line and misinterpreting it, so let us go back 4 verses to the start of this Surah, to begin with this is one of the last Surah to be revealed, and this Surah was revealed when Mecca was still under the control of Mushrikeen (polytheists) and when Muhammad (pbuh) returned from Battle of Tabuk, around 9th year of Hijri.Kabaa still housed idols and people (polytheists) use to perform Tawaf around the Kaaba naked, and Muhammed (pbuh) wanted to perform Hajj but didn't want to be associated with the idol worships performing the Tawaf naked, and at that time Muslims had treaty with Mushrikeen (Treaty of Hudaybiyyah) which was signed 3 years ago which promised 10 years of peace, but mushrikeen broke the treaty by attacking Bedouin Khuza'a, and Surah At-Tawbah was the declaration of disassociation with all of them and ending of those treaties because of the breach of treaty.Muhammad (pbuh) sent Abu Bakr (ra) to lead Muslims in Hajj and to tell Mushrikeen that they would not be able to perform the rituals of Tawaf (naked or otherwise) or Hajj next year and to lead the Muslims and to teach them the rituals of Hajj.After Abu Bakr (ra) left for hajj, Muhammad (pbuh) sent Ali ibn Abu Talib (ra) to Mecca to tell them (Mushrikeen) publicly about the news of disassociation with those they had treaty, that to generalise this is the context of first few ayats of Surah At-Tawbah.Muhammed (pbuh) gave Ali ibn Abu Talib (ra) the first few ayat (approx 30-40) of Surah At-Tawbah to recite them to Mushrikeen publicly and declare the ending of treaty.
      [This is a declaration of] disassociation, from Allah and His Messenger, to those with whom you had made a treaty among the polytheists. (Surah At-Tawbah 9:1)The treaties between tribes were different, some treaties were indefinite and some treaties had an expiry date, but the declaration gave all treaties (indefinite and any treaty less than 4 months) to be ended in 4 months time, any other treaty which had a date (not indefinite) and that is after the 4 months time would end on its decided date, no matter how long they were for Allah said in 9:4 "...so complete for them their treaty until their term [has ended]..." but for the 4 months until the treaties would end the Mushrikeen were allowed to travel freely, this in layman terms refers to as (You have 4 months to travel and find a sanctuary) and that no Mushrik would be allowed to perform Hajj next year (10th Hijri, the Hajj that Muhammad (pbuh) performed hajj) and no one would be allowed to perform Tawaf naked.
      So travel freely, [O disbelievers], throughout the land [during] four months but know that you cannot cause failure to Allah and that Allah will disgrace the disbelievers. (Surah At-Tawbah 9:2)Ali ibn Abu Talib (ra) recited these Ayat to Mushrikeen on the day of Arafah (9th Dhul Hijjah 9th Hijri) as asked by Muhammad (pbuh) to do so, the day is referred as "the day of greater pilgrimage" in 9:3 (see below), and the Mushrikeen were given the months of Dhul Hijjah (20 days), Muharram, Safar, Rabi-ul-Awal and it would end on 10th of Rabbi-Ath-Thani completing 4 months. Allah asks Mushrikeen to repent (tawbah)
      And [it is] an announcement from Allah and His Messenger to the people on the day of the greater pilgrimage that Allah is disassociated from the disbelievers, and [so is] His Messenger. So if you repent, that is best for you; but if you turn away - then know that you will not cause failure to Allah . And give tidings to those who disbelieve of a painful punishment. (Surah At-Tawbah 9:3)As explained before the treaties that had a fixed time period that was beyond the 4 months time was excluded and the treaties were honored till they ended,
      Excepted are those with whom you made a treaty among the polytheists and then they have not been deficient toward you in anything or supported anyone against you; so complete for them their treaty until their term [has ended]. Indeed, Allah loves the righteous [who fear Him]. (Surah At-Tawbah 9:4)And what would happen after the 4 months of probation period for any Mushrik be breaking the treaty?
      And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. (Surah At-Tawbah 9:5)The term "wherever you find them" doesn't include killing anyone in Masjid Al Haram (...And do not fight them at al-Masjid al- Haram until they fight you there...Surah Al-Baqarah 2:191). This verse also known as the "Verse of the sword" was to make sure that it abrogated every treaty, every term with any Mushrik (idolator). You have to remember the context again, this verse is being recited publicly by Ali ibn Abu Talib (ra) to the Mushrikeen of Mecca and letting them know what is commanded of them to do after the 4 months probation has ended, and there is also a "but"
      And if any one of the polytheists seeks your protection, then grant him protection so that he may hear the words of Allah . Then deliver him to his place of safety. That is because they are a people who do not know. How can there be for the polytheists a treaty in the sight of Allah and with His Messenger, except for those with whom you made a treaty at al-Masjid al-Haram? So as long as they are upright toward you, be upright toward them. Indeed, Allah loves the righteous [who fear Him].(Surah At-Tawbah 9:6-7)History tells us that, no blood was shed and Mecca was conquered diplomatically (maybe because of 9:5?), and that Mecca was purged of idols. And anyone who seeked protection (they are called Mu'ahid) and it was a duty of the person (Muslim) to protect Mu'ahid who seeked their protection until they are safe.
      Narrated by 'Abdullah bin 'Amr The Prophet said, "Whoever killed a Mu'ahid (a person who is granted the pledge of protection by the Muslims) shall not smell the fragrance of Paradise though its fragrance can be smelt at a distance of forty years (of traveling)." (Sahih Bukhari Vol 9, Book 83, Number 49)And Allah knows best.

    • @beautymakeuplovesosa
      @beautymakeuplovesosa 6 місяців тому +2

      The chapter 9 has a historical context, please stop throwing verses out of context to make islam look bad.
      If you want to have a fair, real debate, I am totally for it

  • @arnulfosolisjr3559
    @arnulfosolisjr3559 5 місяців тому +1

    Jesus Christ is God Almighty 💯🙏😁

  • @ZeroCelsius777
    @ZeroCelsius777 6 місяців тому

    At 4:28...your MISTAKE is that you are saying YOUR CANON ONLY would constitute what is INJEEL.
    #1...I am NOT saying that you believe the PROTESTANT CANON...but, when Quran said "Oh People of the Book," PROTESTANTS did NOT exist and would not exist for another 900 years.
    The "People of the Book" who did exist are...Ebionites...Nazarenes...Arians...Ethiopians (they have 81 books)...Catholics...etc.

    • @RickyVis
      @RickyVis 6 місяців тому

      Protestants have the same book as Catholics and Orthodox. The Bible every major sect in christianity use today was compiled centuries before Muhammad was born.
      Quran 48:29 it says '' And their description in the Gospel is as a plant which produces its offshoots and strengthens them so they grow firm and stand upon their stalks, delighting the sowers''
      The only gospel that has something similair is Mark 4:28-29 indicating that Muhammad believed at least the gospel of Mark was the gospel because it talks about THE desciption in THE gospel, not A desciption in A gospel.

    • @ZeroCelsius777
      @ZeroCelsius777 6 місяців тому

      @@RickyVis
      You wrote, "The Bible every major sect in christianity use today was compiled centuries before Muhammad was born."
      Ebionites are "People of the Book"...
      INJEEL/GOSPEL of the Ebionites says that Jesus did NOT eat the PASSOVER meal because he was a VEGETARIAN.
      The Book "The Shepherd of Hermas," which Irenaeus considered to be canonical scripture, and is found in the CODEX SINAITICUS says about FORGIVENESS of SIN...
      "For after you have made known to them these words which my Lord has commanded me to reveal to you, then shall they be forgiven all the sins which in former times they committed, and forgiveness will be granted to all the saints who have sinned even to the present day, if they repent with all their heart, and drive all doubts from their minds."
      NO needing any SACRIFICE

    • @ZeroCelsius777
      @ZeroCelsius777 6 місяців тому

      @@RickyVis
      Since you mention MARK Ch. 4...
      Quran 48:29 could just as well be referring to INJEEL/GOSPEL of THOMAS saying #9 my friend.
      Also, Saying #5 from Injeel/Gospel of Thomas is the same as…Mark 4:22

    • @RickyVis
      @RickyVis 6 місяців тому

      @@ZeroCelsius777 Ebionites were rejected by the church and had many false teachings the main example of this is that they believed James was the successor to Jesus even though the scripture is clear Jesus chose Peter.
      This was already removed centuries before Muhammad lived. And also the gospels supercede all other works of the new testament. Similair to for example how the Quran supercedes any Hadith.

    • @ZeroCelsius777
      @ZeroCelsius777 6 місяців тому

      @@RickyVis
      Ebionites where "REJECTED" by YOUR CHURCH
      Quran does NOT take sides. They are still "People of the Book"

  • @osuclassof88
    @osuclassof88 6 місяців тому

    John is not written by John .... John 3: .. 23Now John was also baptizing at Aenon near Salim, because the water was plentiful there, and people kept coming to be baptized. 24(For John had not yet been thrown into prison.)
    25Then a dispute arose between John’s disciples and a certain Jewg over the issue of ceremonial washing. 26So John’s disciples came to him and said, “Look, Rabbi, the One who was with you beyond the Jordan, the One you testified about-He is baptizing, and everyone is going to Him.” 27John replied, “A man can receive only what is given him from heaven. 28You yourselves can testify that I said, ‘I am not the Christ, but am sent ahead of Him.’ 29The bride belongs to the bridegroom. The friend of the bridegroom stands and listens for him, and is overjoyed to hear the bridegroom’s voice. That joy is mine, and it is now complete. 30He must increase; I must decrease.

    • @zz-wv2sh
      @zz-wv2sh 6 місяців тому +3

      john the apostle is talking about john the baptizer. you dont actually think they were the same person do you?😂

    • @KerussotheKingdom
      @KerussotheKingdom  6 місяців тому +4

      Bro John the Apostle and John the Baptist are two different people

    • @osuclassof88
      @osuclassof88 6 місяців тому

      @@zz-wv2sh no one knows "John who" wrote John 😂

    • @tempelhoferfeld7727
      @tempelhoferfeld7727 6 місяців тому +1

      ​@@osuclassof88you did it all wrong, that happens by Bad copypaste!

    • @zz-wv2sh
      @zz-wv2sh 6 місяців тому

      @@osuclassof88 john son of zebedee and salome, brother of james