The Polaris torpedoes are housed in rotating magazines that can be manually reloaded from the cargo hold. It has 1 torpedo in each tube, plus six torpedoes in each magazine.
@@ZyvhurStudios it's an almost "blink and you'll miss it" detail from the Ironclad is Rad ISC. Fun fact; the Torpedo room of the Perseus closely matches the Polaris, with the central hallways & railings, along with the console & visible torpedo magazine.
@@ZyvhurStudios I traded my Odyssey for a Perseus & Ironclad during ILW, using some warbond CCU's to make the transition possible without too much additional money.
@@harabecswurveweathers Yes I don't think I'll buy back my Odyssey with the Polaris having upgraded cargo, and excited to test the torps on the Idris missions :)
Don't buy new jpg or anything from them until they start doing what they say. This game is boring af anyway. I've wasted hundreds of dollars on this crap and nothing works right for years now.
I like the changes. Especially since they gave the Valk some love. I think a lot of people had already planned to solo the Polaris as much as possible, or maybe have a friend with them.
Best solo daily driver. Cannot wait for November and use the Polaris for cargo runs and box missions. Weaponry is a bonus on this one for me : it is a moving base!
@@COMMANDERHAWK22 Try your best mate., I've been told that since I started playing in 2015. And I've been soloing large ships since then. The real truth is, I'll be fine Even better than now because the sheer shields and HP will make me immune to basically everything beside the largest torpedoes the game has to offer right now. Please, I invite everyone to FINALLY try and make true what they say, I double dare them.
I see base building being similar to Subnautica. Where a flying drone 3D prints the base module on the ground (basically a hut). This will actually be very simple for CIG to install into the game as a first step into base building. Later, down the road, they can add other connecting and specialized modules to go with it.
It will be more interesting when we see what ships will be flyable, and which ones will be concept. I kinda feel like the starlancer and the fortune may be concept, but who knows. If they are straight to flyable it would be pretty cool to see them just drop a couple larger ships outta nowhere like that.
those components on the MISC fortune make it sound like a small salvage ship like about prospector size could even be a variant remember they are adding extra shield components to ships for redundancy to go along side engineering
Yeah it will probably come down to its cargo capacity, those extra shields makes me think it might have more than the vulture, but that's just wild speculation lol
Same here, dormant org, and a fair amount of people feeling unenthused to play after the nerfs. My enthusiasm for the Polaris has been crushed by fears they'll nerf it.
Geez. Sure are a lotta babies out there that don’t like balanced games. Give em a few weeks and they’ll get normal again…. Soon as all the cool new stuff comes out. It’s like they’ve never read the warning you click EVERY TIME YOU PLAY at the start…..
@@charliemcawesome5012 Geez. Sure got a lotta people who can't empathize with the fact a product was sold at a set dollar value, then afterwards a change is made which logically would reduce said value of said product. In the normal world, this is called "False advertising". Here, it gets to call itself "Game balancing" 2. I am capable of having a dialogue without resulting to the belittling of another, perhaps you wish to try that some time? An opinion needn't* be insulted, though I welcome debate. 3, and lastly. I can welcome balancing, but the complete neutering of a vessel's capability goes beyond that of "balancing". Perhaps you could try buffing other ships instead of nerfing those that which others have already purchased with the set idea of what is it they own. Perhaps you could try other means, think outside the box. What about a new kind/type of shield?
I wouldn't be too surprised if they made the Polaris some amount of solo~able to start with just to make it more attractive to a broader audience while it's for sale and then crack down on that further down the line when it's available in game (kind of like they are trying to do with the Corsair).
Great video! I was hoping to dive into these and your video appeared 🙂. I am hoping for a larger solo orientated salvage ship as well (I like the Vulture but don't love it). l also like my Taurus; however, I am interested to see what MISC offers in the Starlancer, too. I really like MISC's industrial design language. Cant wait to see this stuff!
@@ZyvhurStudios That's awesome news, I feel like I'm very close with my fleet too. I hope I can fill out the last of the CCUs I need this IAE so I can wrap things up. Hopefully we see sub-$100 WB CCUs again - it's been so long...
i am relatively sure that the PDS's will not shoot at other ships .. that would defy the whole point of them as a line of defense against rockets and torpedos if they could be "distracted" by fighters flying past the ship. in regard to the A2 ... i guess they will pull out the large bombs as a module and go and sell the smaller bombs as another module that will later be available in game aswell. (like they just did with the retaliator.)
I'm very excited about the new MISC ships, probably my 2nd favorite brand (behind RSI) though I personally only have the Hull D (got a great deal on it before the price increase) and Freelancer Max in my hangar. I'll definitely be upgrading my Freelancer Max to a Starlancer Max and either my Vulture or Argo Raft to the Fortune. Nice video Zyhur, very informative. Keep up the great work!
Careful that they don't go nerfing those as well In actuality, maybe they will, maybe they won't, but so many nerfs, it has me wondering who their dart supplier is.
@@CrobraStrike27 I love how the babies take every opportunity to cry about something especially when nothing I said is related to nerfs or any ships receiving a nerf.
@@Dejocko 1. The insult was unnecessary to broach conversation. 2. While I admit that yes, my comment isn't the most related to yours in a sense, it is a cautionary tale about how CIG is currently running their ship program. One person's* excitement* may turn to regret, given enough time. Such as many backers are now discovering.
@@CrobraStrike27 CIG is going to change ships after their release for any number of reasons. It happens in all online multiplayer games. Think about it, be it classes, ships, tanks, weapons, champions, etc. things change, get used to it or just log off the internet. I’m tired of people crying about it and MM at every turn. Your original comment was the only thing unnecessary here. ua-cam.com/video/DksSPZTZES0/v-deo.htmlsi=1x7E8cucT8YNHXCT
@@Dejocko The difference here is investment. If people invested actual cash into a class, with the understanding of how it works, or rather how it should, there is expectation. Investment, and expectation, are two values that help determine standing in a false advertising law suit. Now, I have no intentions or thoughts of that as of now, but it's a point. Now, if a said class, where there is significant investment and expectation as to what it is, and what it does, is suddenly changed altogether to the point of devaluing said class, then that is essentially robbing the person of their investment, and subverting their expectation. Games like WoW and Battlefield don't worry because you don't officially pay to play such classes. Here, you do for your ships. As such, it is completely reasonable for there to be such backlash to these changes.
Ah, let me get this straight. We have a Player moving a size 10 torpedo with a tractor beam (rifle?), while the ship is in a battle? Oh, nothing can go wrong here. ;-) I'm thinking, when we're able to install AI blades to the PDS turrets, we'll be able to set them to fire at anything (missile, ship, torpedo) "attacking" our ship (if IFoF works). Typical, I mention the purpose for AI blades and then you remark about them. ;-D Did you say that only "capital ships" can use AI blades? I hope not, I want to install them on mu Cutlass, Warden, C2, etc... to scare off Pirates and to let me escape.
Considering that my Kickstarter ship is my Freelancer, and Starlancer is a far superior game to Freelancer... I'm pretty excited for the MISC Starlancer. Must resist urge to expand fleet.
A military torpedo vessel like the Polaris would have a modern state of the art auto loader for the torpedoes. Im not saying that loader wouldn't have to be manually activated but the notion that crew would have to tractor the ordnance from its cradle into the tube sounds dangerous and inefficient.
I'm not seeing where the Fortune is in between the Vulture and the Reclaimer. It's got one salvage head. Now, in other respects, maybe, but that's kind of the determining item for a salvage ship in my opinion.
Everything is going to be updated and change as they do multiple balance passes. Your Corsair will be fine, it'll do what it is described to do in the pledge store at the end of the day. It's a commerce raider (basically) disguised as an exploration ship: it should do that job well, not something meant to go hunt ERTs or anything like that outside of its intended use case. It's like the Redeemer, which was never intended to take down large ships, but rather a support ship for troops or anti-fighter duties.
@JL-rj9fl I understand your view, but I'm confident that once they burden a co-pilot with having to manage the rear top turret and systems, there will be no going back. Hence, in my head, this is capitalizing on their ambiguous description, selling us the Corsair a year ago, only to nerf it once something else shiny is available to take it's place. Yes, it's an exploration ship and a liberator of cargo, yet the Conne is more manuverable and tanky. I'm expecting that to change next.... Thus, I am becoming more apathetic and will not be partaking in the FoMO.
@@melsy2 Definitely understandable, I think the Connie will also see changes too. I think they are doing a lot of things in preparation for more extensive multicrew testing. If it was up to me to make a change to the Corsair I probably would have just downsized some of the guns to start and see how that went first. I would hold on to your Corsair in any case and see what ends up happening. They could revert those changes later on, and I think you're smart to not get caught up in the fomo of something new.
They need to stop doing anything other than making the game a consistent experience. I dont know if thats server meshing or what but none of this shit, none of it, matters if when you land at the place youre going to do the mission at the game crashes/npcs dont react/things dont spawn/etc. None of this matters at all.
why will they be manually loaded? What year is this game in? Do we manually load in a sub now ? No we dont. If you listen to the video they said that they are working on the loading mechanism for the torps.
i want the nose turret to be energy not ballistic, i also think all the missiles should be way bigger we already carry big torpedoes why not big missiles too. triple the size of all the missiles
Can't see myself getting into any of these ships with all the nerfs going around, it has me frustrated to no end. Helldivers had to learn this mistake themselves, and you would think CIG could learn this lesson through observation but I guess not. Not to mention, it seems they have a habit of releasing a good ship, marketing it as such, then nerfing it once they have all the money. Not cool. The fact that allegedly the Starlancer gets a S3 shield but the Redeemer doesn't, is just crazy to me. Now to be fair, I recall hearing that somebody making a point to the change, claiming that redundancy could play a part it the change being better or at least neutral, but I have my doubts.
We do luv the overall game rebalancing especially balancing the redeemer/corsair to what they were intended, and equally CIG's push for multi-crewed large ships, very interesting times, its what us long term backers have waited for. Good times
@@davewills148 That's one opinion on the matter. Another, is that 1. The Redeemer was specifically advertised as having heavier shields and less armor as to promote maneuverability. This was so important to the design, they cosmetically eluded to it. They're actively then going against the very thing it was designed and advertised to be. 2. To change a ship, several years post sale, in a way that realistically devalues the actual price of the ship after players invested in it, is almost criminal. You get more in a Constellation for $100 less. 3. I am also a long time backer, I'm just one that doesn't like being undercut. It's like having the rug pulled out from underneath you. It's all fun and games until it's the ship you own gets penalized.
Based on the evo's test of components so far, military components will take more power, and regen faster, that redundancy might also be an advantage, I wouldn't worry too much about components just yet
The Polaris torpedoes are housed in rotating magazines that can be manually reloaded from the cargo hold. It has 1 torpedo in each tube, plus six torpedoes in each magazine.
Ah manually reloaded, auto magazine, good catch
@@ZyvhurStudios it's an almost "blink and you'll miss it" detail from the Ironclad is Rad ISC. Fun fact; the Torpedo room of the Perseus closely matches the Polaris, with the central hallways & railings, along with the console & visible torpedo magazine.
@@harabecswurveweathers looking forward to that ship too
@@ZyvhurStudios I traded my Odyssey for a Perseus & Ironclad during ILW, using some warbond CCU's to make the transition possible without too much additional money.
@@harabecswurveweathers Yes I don't think I'll buy back my Odyssey with the Polaris having upgraded cargo, and excited to test the torps on the Idris missions :)
It would be way cooler if they worked on the backlog of ships already paid for instead of constantly working on new ship
They already got the money for backlogged ships sold, they make no money on finishing them.
@@UH60-Arthur so you are ok with going out shopping and paying for something but never actually getting the item. That’s fraud.
Don't buy new jpg or anything from them until they start doing what they say. This game is boring af anyway. I've wasted hundreds of dollars on this crap and nothing works right for years now.
YES this
What are you going to do with your BMM? Pretend to be a merchant?
I like the changes. Especially since they gave the Valk some love.
I think a lot of people had already planned to solo the Polaris as much as possible, or maybe have a friend with them.
Best solo daily driver. Cannot wait for November and use the Polaris for cargo runs and box missions. Weaponry is a bonus on this one for me : it is a moving base!
so your going to be a loot pinata
@@COMMANDERHAWK22 Try your best mate., I've been told that since I started playing in 2015. And I've been soloing large ships since then.
The real truth is, I'll be fine Even better than now because the sheer shields and HP will make me immune to basically everything beside the largest torpedoes the game has to offer right now.
Please, I invite everyone to FINALLY try and make true what they say, I double dare them.
I see base building being similar to Subnautica. Where a flying drone 3D prints the base module on the ground (basically a hut). This will actually be very simple for CIG to install into the game as a first step into base building. Later, down the road, they can add other connecting and specialized modules to go with it.
Yes I think I saw somewhere in the citcon sides last year where a drone was printing a structure
I could spend months on Lorville with a MISC Raptor. 😁😁😁
me too lol
Heavy Interceptor... sounds like something thats gunna get neft into the ground a year after it comes out.
sad but true lol
It will be more interesting when we see what ships will be flyable, and which ones will be concept. I kinda feel like the starlancer and the fortune may be concept, but who knows. If they are straight to flyable it would be pretty cool to see them just drop a couple larger ships outta nowhere like that.
good points :)
those components on the MISC fortune make it sound like a small salvage ship like about prospector size could even be a variant remember they are adding extra shield components to ships for redundancy to go along side engineering
Yeah it will probably come down to its cargo capacity, those extra shields makes me think it might have more than the vulture, but that's just wild speculation lol
Can’t bring myself to get the least bit excited for more ships. Multiple orgs I play with are going dormant from this last broken patch.
Same here, dormant org, and a fair amount of people feeling unenthused to play after the nerfs. My enthusiasm for the Polaris has been crushed by fears they'll nerf it.
Geez. Sure are a lotta babies out there that don’t like balanced games. Give em a few weeks and they’ll get normal again…. Soon as all the cool new stuff comes out. It’s like they’ve never read the warning you click EVERY TIME YOU PLAY at the start…..
@@charliemcawesome5012 Geez. Sure got a lotta people who can't empathize with the fact a product was sold at a set dollar value, then afterwards a change is made which logically would reduce said value of said product. In the normal world, this is called "False advertising". Here, it gets to call itself "Game balancing"
2. I am capable of having a dialogue without resulting to the belittling of another, perhaps you wish to try that some time? An opinion needn't* be insulted, though I welcome debate.
3, and lastly. I can welcome balancing, but the complete neutering of a vessel's capability goes beyond that of "balancing". Perhaps you could try buffing other ships instead of nerfing those that which others have already purchased with the set idea of what is it they own. Perhaps you could try other means, think outside the box. What about a new kind/type of shield?
Yeah, I jsut dont care after what they are doing to the redeemer
Whoosh
Yeah, the gunports of the Corsair leaked away into the copilot seat.
2:50 You would think In 800 YEARS they would have figured automation out 🤦♀ only CIG makes everything labor intensive.
Great read on these leaks and sounds exciting!
thank you! it really is :)
the Mirai sounds intresting but from the look last con i dont see room for a interior
I wouldn't be too surprised if they made the Polaris some amount of solo~able to start with just to make it more attractive to a broader audience while it's for sale and then crack down on that further down the line when it's available in game (kind of like they are trying to do with the Corsair).
Glad i have LTI on my baby Polaris, it will cover the cost of those S10 Torps, Phew! i was kinda worried they wouldn't be.
Great video! I was hoping to dive into these and your video appeared 🙂.
I am hoping for a larger solo orientated salvage ship as well (I like the Vulture but don't love it). l also like my Taurus; however, I am interested to see what MISC offers in the Starlancer, too. I really like MISC's industrial design language. Cant wait to see this stuff!
Thank you so much :) and me too its the last thing I'm probably going to get to finish off my fleet
@@ZyvhurStudios That's awesome news, I feel like I'm very close with my fleet too. I hope I can fill out the last of the CCUs I need this IAE so I can wrap things up. Hopefully we see sub-$100 WB CCUs again - it's been so long...
i am relatively sure that the PDS's will not shoot at other ships .. that would defy the whole point of them as a line of defense against rockets and torpedos if they could be "distracted" by fighters flying past the ship.
in regard to the A2 ... i guess they will pull out the large bombs as a module and go and sell the smaller bombs as another module that will later be available in game aswell. (like they just did with the retaliator.)
You should be able to give them target priority, so you can choose between missiles or fighters
yes now they have modularity in, it's certainly a possibility
Very excited for a larger salvage ship, not excited for it to have a mailbox slot view.
The Prospector doesn't have one. I suspect the Salvager will be much the same where you need to see to work.
wow a new ship who would of seen that coming
I don’t know about soloing the Polaris but the idris has them too so I hope it’s the first version of Ai blades
me too man, me too
Man lots of potentially cool things coming!
I'm very excited about the new MISC ships, probably my 2nd favorite brand (behind RSI) though I personally only have the Hull D (got a great deal on it before the price increase) and Freelancer Max in my hangar. I'll definitely be upgrading my Freelancer Max to a Starlancer Max and either my Vulture or Argo Raft to the Fortune.
Nice video Zyhur, very informative. Keep up the great work!
Careful that they don't go nerfing those as well
In actuality, maybe they will, maybe they won't, but so many nerfs, it has me wondering who their dart supplier is.
@@CrobraStrike27 I love how the babies take every opportunity to cry about something especially when nothing I said is related to nerfs or any ships receiving a nerf.
@@Dejocko 1. The insult was unnecessary to broach conversation.
2. While I admit that yes, my comment isn't the most related to yours in a sense, it is a cautionary tale about how CIG is currently running their ship program. One person's* excitement* may turn to regret, given enough time. Such as many backers are now discovering.
@@CrobraStrike27 CIG is going to change ships after their release for any number of reasons. It happens in all online multiplayer games. Think about it, be it classes, ships, tanks, weapons, champions, etc. things change, get used to it or just log off the internet.
I’m tired of people crying about it and MM at every turn. Your original comment was the only thing unnecessary here.
ua-cam.com/video/DksSPZTZES0/v-deo.htmlsi=1x7E8cucT8YNHXCT
@@Dejocko The difference here is investment. If people invested actual cash into a class, with the understanding of how it works, or rather how it should, there is expectation. Investment, and expectation, are two values that help determine standing in a false advertising law suit. Now, I have no intentions or thoughts of that as of now, but it's a point.
Now, if a said class, where there is significant investment and expectation as to what it is, and what it does, is suddenly changed altogether to the point of devaluing said class, then that is essentially robbing the person of their investment, and subverting their expectation.
Games like WoW and Battlefield don't worry because you don't officially pay to play such classes. Here, you do for your ships. As such, it is completely reasonable for there to be such backlash to these changes.
Definitely want the hover trolley
Ah, let me get this straight. We have a Player moving a size 10 torpedo with a tractor beam (rifle?), while the ship is in a battle?
Oh, nothing can go wrong here. ;-)
I'm thinking, when we're able to install AI blades to the PDS turrets, we'll be able to set them to fire at anything (missile, ship, torpedo) "attacking" our ship (if IFoF works).
Typical, I mention the purpose for AI blades and then you remark about them. ;-D
Did you say that only "capital ships" can use AI blades?
I hope not, I want to install them on mu Cutlass, Warden, C2, etc... to scare off Pirates and to let me escape.
Great work on the video! Thanks for the info! Love your work!
Thank you so much! XD o7
If you can take some criticism, you can add stock footage of the ship talked about in the background. People memorize what they see.
Yes I do add them is other videos :)
Considering that my Kickstarter ship is my Freelancer, and Starlancer is a far superior game to Freelancer... I'm pretty excited for the MISC Starlancer. Must resist urge to expand fleet.
Yes, you an me both lol
A military torpedo vessel like the Polaris would have a modern state of the art auto loader for the torpedoes. Im not saying that loader wouldn't have to be manually activated but the notion that crew would have to tractor the ordnance from its cradle into the tube sounds dangerous and inefficient.
I agree but that's just want I heard last about it
I'm not seeing where the Fortune is in between the Vulture and the Reclaimer. It's got one salvage head. Now, in other respects, maybe, but that's kind of the determining item for a salvage ship in my opinion.
I heard that idris are getting pds as well.
Yes I believe so
I think erkul has the torpedo hardpoints at size 10 with size 9 torps, are the torps going to be size 9 or 10
size 10, erkul is just using the tali's torps as a placeholder
Misc Starlancer looks appealing until they nerf it like my poor Corsair.
Nope I'm good, I'll buy it in game
Everything is going to be updated and change as they do multiple balance passes. Your Corsair will be fine, it'll do what it is described to do in the pledge store at the end of the day. It's a commerce raider (basically) disguised as an exploration ship: it should do that job well, not something meant to go hunt ERTs or anything like that outside of its intended use case. It's like the Redeemer, which was never intended to take down large ships, but rather a support ship for troops or anti-fighter duties.
@JL-rj9fl I understand your view, but I'm confident that once they burden a co-pilot with having to manage the rear top turret and systems, there will be no going back.
Hence, in my head, this is capitalizing on their ambiguous description, selling us the Corsair a year ago, only to nerf it once something else shiny is available to take it's place.
Yes, it's an exploration ship and a liberator of cargo, yet the Conne is more manuverable and tanky.
I'm expecting that to change next....
Thus, I am becoming more apathetic and will not be partaking in the FoMO.
@@melsy2 Definitely understandable, I think the Connie will also see changes too. I think they are doing a lot of things in preparation for more extensive multicrew testing. If it was up to me to make a change to the Corsair I probably would have just downsized some of the guns to start and see how that went first.
I would hold on to your Corsair in any case and see what ends up happening. They could revert those changes later on, and I think you're smart to not get caught up in the fomo of something new.
@JL-rj9fl indeed, she's not leaving my fleet. Yet I am having a God Father moment "Look at what they did to my boy" 😢
@@melsy2 lol, I read that in Corleone's voice.
They need to stop doing anything other than making the game a consistent experience. I dont know if thats server meshing or what but none of this shit, none of it, matters if when you land at the place youre going to do the mission at the game crashes/npcs dont react/things dont spawn/etc. None of this matters at all.
It says "Qi" though, the Chinese word for "energy", not "QI".
QI would make more sense cause it could mean Quantum Interceptor.
Yes since it's an xml file name its likely short for "Quantum interdictor"
why will they be manually loaded? What year is this game in? Do we manually load in a sub now ? No we dont. If you listen to the video they said that they are working on the loading mechanism for the torps.
It better be the shit I purchased years ago. I couldn’t give a shit less if not.
i want the nose turret to be energy not ballistic, i also think all the missiles should be way bigger we already carry big torpedoes why not big missiles too. triple the size of all the missiles
Can't see myself getting into any of these ships with all the nerfs going around, it has me frustrated to no end. Helldivers had to learn this mistake themselves, and you would think CIG could learn this lesson through observation but I guess not.
Not to mention, it seems they have a habit of releasing a good ship, marketing it as such, then nerfing it once they have all the money. Not cool.
The fact that allegedly the Starlancer gets a S3 shield but the Redeemer doesn't, is just crazy to me. Now to be fair, I recall hearing that somebody making a point to the change, claiming that redundancy could play a part it the change being better or at least neutral, but I have my doubts.
On second thought, there is a chance I could end up simping for the Mirai Guardian, but we'll see.
We do luv the overall game rebalancing especially balancing the redeemer/corsair to what they were intended, and equally CIG's push for multi-crewed large ships, very interesting times, its what us long term backers have waited for. Good times
@@davewills148 That's one opinion on the matter. Another, is that 1. The Redeemer was specifically advertised as having heavier shields and less armor as to promote maneuverability. This was so important to the design, they cosmetically eluded to it. They're actively then going against the very thing it was designed and advertised to be.
2. To change a ship, several years post sale, in a way that realistically devalues the actual price of the ship after players invested in it, is almost criminal. You get more in a Constellation for $100 less.
3. I am also a long time backer, I'm just one that doesn't like being undercut. It's like having the rug pulled out from underneath you. It's all fun and games until it's the ship you own gets penalized.
Based on the evo's test of components so far, military components will take more power, and regen faster, that redundancy might also be an advantage, I wouldn't worry too much about components just yet
hope the ST won't be an E1 replacer. They already did the spirit c1 dirty with the zeus cl.
Yeah that would be brutal
LEAKS?! lets call it INFO
After what they are doing tot he redeemer, I jsut dont care anymore
This will be nerfed. Dont swipe yet.
is the crusader intrepid a mini ION or inferno?
Ooh good question, new players might want an energy gun
Great video
Glad you enjoyed it! :)
Only thing leaking in this game is its code