Many US and European wind turbines are old, inefficient and installed close to human habitation. Also many didn't get maintained regulary, broke down and left to deteriorate. Once they fail the required return margin they would be decommissioned. China's wind farms are newish and usually installed in remote areas in large numbers with reasonable capacity say in excess of 2MW each. They are new and adequately maintained and systematically managed.
@@user-np1sq5vt5e Yes. I have spent all life working on power generation mainly on large thermal power plants of all types from disel, gas, crude oil, coal and nuclear. I have not personally participated in wind and solar generation myself but am conversant with the technology. You spent a lot of the footage explaining the inner working, selection of GRP and design of a wind turbine. This is not relevant to the title of your video. My comments are based on what I have seen on the decommissioning of wind turbines in the west. Also wind energy is an enemy of the big gas and oil companies in US so any disatifaction, like malfunctions, outages, noises, environmental impacts and failure of the blades could be politicised and used to remove the wind turbines. China manages to install wind turbines in uninhabited area and systematically manage them so the growth of this sector is still bright. You know a wind turbine is a mechanical system. As such it will eventually break down or becomes obsolete. China wind generation is still young and has not had the experience of disposing large amount of obsolete wind turbines yet. I believe the biggest of them has grown to 16 MW. There will be a limit on how it can be erected and maintain. Already most of the big wind turbines have to be installed offshore. Wind turbine does use up a lot of unpopulated land.
First of all, many people just looked at the front of my video and didn't see the back. Second, there are some problems in wind power generation. You don't understand the situation in China. Third, wind power generation, solar energy and hydropower are regarded as clean energy, and they are inexhaustible. China is now vigorously building wind power, which is built in a large area. It can be said that it is so large that you can't imagine. China's thermal power generation is now shrinking. I personally like mechanical knowledge. When you see my video, you should find this. At the same time, you should also like machinery.
Talking about thermal power plant. It is sad that public still take it a one of the major source contributes to air pollution. I might not right, but aside waste product by thermal power plant, there are actually more major pollution caused by the other industry. Expand your vision and look into thing with better understanding on bigger picture. Hungry for electricity, but didn't want to provide any good effort and yet still demand for even cheaper electricity. No matter how, still some more reject thermal electricity. This is sad that public education nowadays is pretty lagging behind and can't discuss thing fruitfully together with better knowledge exchange.
Total annual U.S. electricity generation from wind energy increased from about 6 billion kilowatthours (kWh) in 2000 to about 338 billion kWh in 2020. In 2020, wind turbines were the source of about 8.4% of total U.S. utility-scale electricity generation.Mar 17, 2021。(google) 你真的是美国人?
簡單又易明一點 !!! 風力發電影響了傳統燃料的利益既得者 .... 肯定要抹殺一下吧 !!!!
你確定嗎?我在美國。我的電力公司供的電就是部分用風力發電。我還要多付費以表示支持綠能。去荷蘭也是到處可見大風車。
大风车就是在荷兰流行的。目前国内出现了一些不好的现象,但是风力发电是一个可持续发展的能源。国内现在安装量特别大,但是我们用电不需要额外加钱,目前国内在慢慢取消火力发电。
@@user-np1sq5vt5e 在荷蘭流行的大風車,在中國出現風電 就是“不好現象” ,這句話要修正點,三萬美元不是這麼好領
@@user-np1sq5vt5e 你可能真不知道,风力发电效果远比光电,再国家可没有说取消啊,上次看到新闻说2025年还是2030年样子可能超过水电
欧美纷纷拆除?我看到我们这里的山上前几年还新刚增了风力叶轮机,坐标欧洲
歐美國家是拆除 發電不穩定的風力發電機……風力不穩定導致供電不穩會導致輸出電不穩 一下供電一下不供電對電網穩定有影響………一整年都在轉…穩定發電的風力電機 根本一座都沒拆………以訛傳訛……
歐洲的土地有現。設備也舊了。別盲目的西方的資訊。
你有什麼更好的辦法嗎?
這個不要,那個不要,如果沒有對策就別科什麼普了。
會提出這種說法,表示妳根本看不懂人家在講什麼,既然連看都看不懂,那就不要留這種言來秀下限了!
@@user-lh7ur7xc8o 台灣 用愛發電支持你
把溫室效應這種全球規模的現象,硬套到風力發電機可能造成的小面積影響
信口開河也不是這樣……
这种属于脑子有病,不用搭理
Many US and European wind turbines are old, inefficient and installed close to human habitation. Also many didn't get maintained regulary, broke down and left to deteriorate. Once they fail the required return margin they would be decommissioned.
China's wind farms are newish and usually installed in remote areas in large numbers with reasonable capacity say in excess of 2MW each. They are new and adequately maintained and systematically managed.
Can you understand what I said??😜😜😜😜
@@user-np1sq5vt5e Yes. I have spent all life working on power generation mainly on large thermal power plants of all types from disel, gas, crude oil, coal and nuclear. I have not personally participated in wind and solar generation myself but am conversant with the technology.
You spent a lot of the footage explaining the inner working, selection of GRP and design of a wind turbine. This is not relevant to the title of your video. My comments are based on what I have seen on the decommissioning of wind turbines in the west.
Also wind energy is an enemy of the big gas and oil companies in US so any disatifaction, like malfunctions, outages, noises, environmental impacts and failure of the blades could be politicised and used to remove the wind turbines. China manages to install wind turbines in uninhabited area and systematically manage them so the growth of this sector is still bright.
You know a wind turbine is a mechanical system. As such it will eventually break down or becomes obsolete. China wind generation is still young and has not had the experience of disposing large amount of obsolete wind turbines yet. I believe the biggest of them has grown to 16 MW. There will be a limit on how it can be erected and maintain. Already most of the big wind turbines have to be installed offshore. Wind turbine does use up a lot of unpopulated land.
First of all, many people just looked at the front of my video and didn't see the back. Second, there are some problems in wind power generation. You don't understand the situation in China. Third, wind power generation, solar energy and hydropower are regarded as clean energy, and they are inexhaustible. China is now vigorously building wind power, which is built in a large area. It can be said that it is so large that you can't imagine. China's thermal power generation is now shrinking.
I personally like mechanical knowledge. When you see my video, you should find this. At the same time, you should also like machinery.
@@user-np1sq5vt5e 这傢伙是赞成你的论调的,为什么你还给他解释?
@@user-np1sq5vt5e , be nice, people neither have to watch your vlog nor make comments.
Electricity generation from wind power in the UK has increased by 715% from 2009 to 2020.
垃圾電?是嗎?我倒覺得,什麼電都可使用,但是,要安全,火力,水力,風力,核能,太陽能,沼氣發電,潮汐發電,都各有必備條件,和不同的風險,只要善用電力,什麼電都是好電,最怕的是環保蟑螂,官員,民代的無形須所,及貪得無厭。
垃圾电指的是电流和电压不稳定的电,必须通过重整才能有效利用,如果不重整就进入电网,会对电网造成非常大的损害。可再生能源很多直接发出来的都是垃圾电,不代表不能用,只是不能直接用。
在中国风力发电不需要建立在人口稠密的区域,能有啥危害?
風力發電有大有小,有些直徑才幾十厘米的風電,就被應用在鄉村路燈工程上,有些鄉村光照好就用太陽能路燈,有些鄉村風大就用小型風電路燈,這是天然能源,比燒煤好多了,煤的形成最少得幾千萬年,自工業革命以后才被人類大量挖崛,恐怕三百年就差不多挖完了,到時候地球到處都是廢墟。
完全不知道在说啥,搜一堆毫无关联风电资料堆砌在一起,装着一本正经的样子念一遍,骗傻子啊?这就跟说不粘锅要开锅一样,又蠢又坏
家庭电风扇也是危害品😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
脑子有病吧,这个博主你搭理他干嘛
做這種低级誤導有害的視頻,還要繼續嗎?
主題轉來轉去,該請個文案員。
你們有想過葉片報廢否怎麼處理??你們真的覺得現在的綠能發電都是沒有污染嗎??別天真啦,沒有一種能原發電是不污染的。
用愛發電
標題黨,差評
最好方法共享電動車同居家的電池制成電網,剩下的就電解CO2做氫再液化儲氫
中国是风力发电技术最先进且设备输出最多的国家。不排除美国对新疆棉,5G的炒作模式。只分析风力发电对环境问题,是否同时也分析核能,石油等其他发电设备对环境的影响??这样对比才能知道。断章取义的手法是有心人一贯手法。就像美国一直攻击中国是排碳最多的国家,但却不提中国有13亿人口。如果以人均排碳计算。美国可是最高的。
欧美国家那些环保人士的逻辑,就好比人权卫士认为,只有投票选举才是民主一样。
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
目前看来 你啥也没有
没错 当到死才是民主
哪個制度比較能避免特權橫行?
屁话!德国增加!
支持!
其實現在已經有可回收拉擠玻板出來了。風電垃圾將可以被解決
还科普,你也不考虑下,中国有多少家庭,要用多少的电,外国不用,中国就不能用吗,不从实际出发,好高骛远,托托的西方主义,要像台湾一样吗?用爱来发电,多环保
视频看完了吗 感觉你没有理解我的意思
这如果有危害,那就请不要对自然环境有任何的改造。衣服也不要穿,地也不要种,也不要畜牧。
这不早就有人说你们中国人不应该吃肉了吗,那就是不把人当人。科学发展本来是让人生活更好。人家话说到这份儿上了,根本就不是科学问题,完全是你死我活的敌对关系,没啥好谈的。
@@ame9021 那我们要不要把他们当人看。。。好矛盾
@@yixinjiang9226 当然要把他们当人看,当敌人看。
活着也有碳排放!人家要收你碳稅呢!
全球回到石器時代好了
沒建風電就狂罵不環保,建了風電說你傷害影響大自然。
最好不要設風力發電!
缺點多多!
無法在尖峰加强供電!
大量夜半風切噪音擾禹物休眠繁殖!大量葉片年限廢棄物無法處理!
反而潮汐、海浪、海流發電比之優!
西方專家的意見可以参考不能盲從。
说的有道理 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
那就问问up主,那你说说什么方式发电完全没有不好的。
當然是!
😓😓😓😓😓😓😓😓😓
低頻傷害是什麼,應該要簡單說明一下,站在普通人的角度
广播有低频,一样伤害人类。只要中国用,就一定不好,讲完。
@@josephguo6256 呵
@@josephguo6256
终于说到重点了。。。。
電荒是因為你們不買澳洲煤炭😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣
话说这些废料用来做底部建筑填料不懂可行不,反正都是填
等洋国把风电拆完后才谈中国吧!😂😂😂
为什么呢???
@@user-np1sq5vt5e 洋国说风力不环保当然要自家先拆除来证明呗!无法证明确要他国来做拆除,这是什么情况呢?😄真的笑死我了
一句说话,只要中国用,就一定不好。
Talking about thermal power plant. It is sad that public still take it a one of the major source contributes to air pollution. I might not right, but aside waste product by thermal power plant, there are actually more major pollution caused by the other industry. Expand your vision and look into thing with better understanding on bigger picture. Hungry for electricity, but didn't want to provide any good effort and yet still demand for even cheaper electricity. No matter how, still some more reject thermal electricity. This is sad that public education nowadays is pretty lagging behind and can't discuss thing fruitfully together with better knowledge exchange.
被标题误导
还以为风力发电有什么新发现的大危害
结果都是些微不足道的吹毛求疵
浪费了宝贵的时间
风力发电主要是并网时会对主电网产生危害、这点没能科普一下啊!
这一点我还真不知道,稍后我会查一下看看😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@user-np1sq5vt5e 其实你除了水视频什么都不知道还不学习,风电比例最高的国家丹麦-欧洲国家。
优秀
風電要配合水力發電解決垃圾電問題。水力用水的位能發電,環保且容易控制發電量。風電則專用於抽水回到高位能好再次水力發電,所謂的垃圾電就藉由水的位能得以零存整付,便於民生與工業電力的使用。
人类动物天天要喝水,破坏耗尽水源,应该消灭地球上所有动物人类。
您聽過風力幫浦?完全不用銅線圈,不用自動控制。
請問,水力發電如果要建水庫,是否又是另一個環保問題呢?
@@zebulonwhite1882 將垃圾電用電纜轉移到合適的水庫。若真沒有那多半在新疆內蒙或其他西北地區,這些地區目前多半人口密度較低,本應該有其他電力轉移計畫或是利用計畫。
@@zebulonwhite1882 封閉循環系統,水中無魚蝦那種。你用沙子蓄位能也可以。
亂講
此话怎讲????
是喔!太陽能,水利沒有環汚?核能就沒污染嗎?所以大家不要用電?
其实就是没有其他好办法的无奈之举
因爲有回扣好撈所以要推廣
错,好多风力发电都是民营企业在搞,自己给自己回扣么? 有些小到几个人合伙搞。
应该给轮子们盘地发电!
欧美学者说风力发电有害。。。。说客之为!
樓主 你有去申請 三萬美元嗎? 迴紋針 都領了不少回
哎呀 不错不错 你连回形针都知道,厉害厉害
人類本身就是一種危害﹗
对!你活着就污染地球。
亂誤導
要有數據跟真實性
你没看完
有空可以看看刘丰老师或卢军宏台长的节目。😃
您沒有提到急殺大型鳥類的問題,影片不錯唷
鳥被人類傷害遠高於被風機傷害,人類噴灑農藥使昆虫死亡,小鳥沒蟲吃而餓死,大鳥因食物鏈斷掉而餓死。
送我一套,我会把它利用的好好的
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂送不起啊 一套小的都要上千万人民币
名词混乱,下次好好看看文案再说。叶片,叶片角度部分。
其實風力發電是很落後的概念,把風能轉成电能是抽取空間能量,大面積会引起氣候变異,不是長久辦法,还是多利用核聚变吧!
風是天然形成免費的,核能需核燃料棒要花費,哪一個最有經濟價值?
还是干脆不用电吧😂哈哈哈😂
風力發電這些都是過時的產品,最新科技五毛小粉紅用嘴砲發電。
这标题差点不想点进来看,还以为是回形针这类的反贼号
我可不是他那样的人啊 ,
@@user-np1sq5vt5e 哈哈哈😄
陳善安發動機取代石油核能
海浪發電是否更穩定供電?
胡说八道
Lol... Ridiculous
你一定找了很多资料,但是我很好奇,是不是大陆在大力发展电动车,所以你找不到风力发电的污染其实是大量的蓄电池废品!!!!!!
按照欧美的逻辑。 你用的都是有问题的,我用的都是最好的。
😱😱😱😱😱😱
这类风车通常建在季风代,对当地动植物的生态影响很大。
哎,揣着美金装糊涂的视频,真的懒得看。用一个没有结论的理由说风力发电不环保。呵呵了
什么东西
太扯了,这个角度也可以咬。不攻击微波炉改攻击风电了?还影响农作物,搞笑死了。
其实就两个问题, 一个是材料不可再利用, 一个是低音危害动物. 但这些相对于火力, 都不是问题! 至于评论说导致大气环流什么的, 脑袋进水了...
搞笑 就这还科普
次声连路过的鸟都能秒掉吗? 确定?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂夸张手法,
他的鳥!在衣田四週裝上,农药也免了?
下面介绍一种新型建筑式风力发电机,可以防止沙漠的移动和沙尘暴. ua-cam.com/video/B3nIaPQApe0/v-deo.html
長知識了!
风力发电当然要发展,可以改进!你乘坐过奔驰的第一代汽车、、、、拆散了不要了?回去骑马?
小弟弟啊爷爷我十几岁出嚟做嘢就唔识乜嘢喇。不过照我哋呢啲老鬼嘅见解就係。咪好似全世界的议会嘅反对党议员净係识得反对。反对完之后又唔提出一个解决方法。简直狗屁不如。
请你不要说我国我国的 谢谢
没有选票?
求求你們不要再諷刺臺灣了。那個芒果集團不理公投一意孤行,
還有幫拿了錢的狗幫著咬人,我們無奈得很哪!
(你家聖上有點出息好不好?)
感谢大家前来关注我,我会在此不停的更新更专业的科普知识。
不要再这里误导观众,欧美的做法就代表正确?你是公知?
不要以西方話語權,誤導群眾!
沒說清楚
风力发电主要是对大气环流的影响,使极端天气增多。
没這回事,白痴才會信
@@user-rn8wh2cc8n 对!破坏大气层?怎样会?
@@cheekiongchan2294 風力發電主要是建設和維修方面非常昂貴,歐美私營電廠對它發出的電力很難獲得利潤,所以才將其拆除,絕非對大氣環流造成影響。
你把地球想的太小了,尼玛这些风扇对整个大气算个屁,况且这些风扇是吸收大气能量的,只会减少极端天气
扯
博主这水平,就别做科普了
胡說八道,危言聳聽。
葉扇只能埋 萬年不化
可用在建筑填充
假新闻,我住江南都不知道缺电啊?
你亂咁废话
就这油田,谈什么伤害。
你國?你是趙家人嗎?你也配姓趙!?
風機低頻噪音距人類住家很遠,風機葉翼污染遠低塑膠袋,風機發電利益遠高於危害,拆風機原因可能是風機設在沙漠區,而消費電力在人口稠密住宅區,需長距離的電纜成本及電力的衰減,供應與需求距離太遠,不符經濟利益。中國大陸土地面積廣大,應該是廣設太陽光電較適合。
不要以西方話語權,誤導群眾!
胡扯。
这个是国外NGO养的反贼博主😂
NoNoNoNoNo,可能你是没有看懂我的视频
@@user-np1sq5vt5e 别生气!有可能是-看到标题就火了,连看也不看,接著留下言就溜了!我为什么知道?我剛才也想这样做,后来忍-忍,想听看你说什么了才做决定!建议改一改标题。
ua-cam.com/video/5v52cZCVtW4/v-deo.html 介绍新型海洋发电机
你国讲科学?
就这质量还舔脸求关注?
最环保的就是女人发电 ?
你教教我,女人怎么发电???😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
脑子有病吧,风力发电有危害?那煤发电就是安全的?
謝謝你,希望中國多多參考你的意見,讓中國有更多污染,更貴的電好用
胡說八道?
二十年前,舊金山到洛杉磯段,有非常多風機,後來全部拆除。
因为森林大火问题,加州什么时候停止大火?
Total annual U.S. electricity generation from wind energy increased from about 6 billion kilowatthours (kWh) in 2000 to about 338 billion kWh in 2020. In 2020, wind turbines were the source of about 8.4% of total U.S. utility-scale electricity generation.Mar 17, 2021。(google) 你真的是美国人?
1990年美国风电是0, 2020,美国风电占全国发电量8.4%,知冇?人讲你又鸠噏,正白痴一名。没有风电水电太阳能核电,美国如何减碳。知道今日美国还有多少燃煤发电厂吗,自己上网查查。
離岸風力發電,真正影響海豚方向,導致未來滅亡……
離岸風電旋轉的葉翼在天空,海豚在海裡游泳,這有甚麼相關性?別胡扯,
太落後了!「台灣萊克多巴🐸」的「用愛發電」多環保啊!🤭
不過!最近又開始「用肺發電」了。😂
你好皮哦,你我还是本家,我也姓江。
你是義和團團員
@@MrNelsonhsieh 你是塔綠班
国内那么多水电风电还有经常停电怎么回事,国外没有那么多发动机但是从来不停电
規劃問題吧!歐盟那邊是電網共用,可以調度,美國這邊是各州負責,偶爾也會停電,但最主要還是用電規,畢竟蓋發電廠要時間,機器也是會壞掉的。
中国是世界工厂,工业用电是美国的两三倍多,尽管中国装机容量和发电量远超美囯,且人均民用电仅有美国的几分之一,但高峰期仍偶有停电发生。