I want one. I should start dropping hints to the XYL now so in 3 to 5 years she may let me have one lol. The 7300 still going well as is the 9700. I am looking at setting up a remote station down south on top of a friends farm about 40KM south of my QTH, its a 400ha sheep and beef farm and 280M above sea level and less than 1KM away from the sea. It has very low RF noise there. The 7300 would be nice to go down there for the remote setup. Thanks for the info. 73 ZL4SY Norm
Sure a nice radio! I just walked out to the yet uncollected skip in the yard and pulled out the better few DVI monitors I could not even give away! One thing I would like to know: How well are the unused antenna sockets earthed? For me to know what is going on on the bands is something I would like to see on my standard 4k monitor. Then I need ONLY one audio out and perhaps a mouse is something I prefer over a tagged touch screen. Still good work and kudos to them Icom engineers giving it all.
The IC-905 uses a custom PoE setup to power the RF deck and is why it must be connected directly to the control head. With this IC-7760 there is no PoE as both the RF desk and the controller have their own power source.
I think this type of config is the future. Being able to mount the guts at a point closer to the antenna and have a smaller head in the shack is awesome! Love it!
No one can place outside a 6000 $ RF deck requiring AC power by their tower. The control head has at most a 9 m cable. The placement of a RF deck 9 m closer to the antenna does not significantly improve antenna matching or coax loss. This is a top end HF transceiver marketed to Contesters and Dxers. Icom needs to release DR-3@2 KHz, BDR and RMDR before serious Contesters will consider it.
@@RSwrightMD the understanding here is that you can use an ethernetcable of max abt 328 ft, abt 90m. According to the skinny information, it can be ised within a network, meaning that you probably can even get it further away. "A control cable (3 m, 9.8 ft) is supplied with the transceiver, and a commercially available LAN cable* can be used to install the RF deck in a more remote location. It enables the RF deck to be placed in a rack or other location away from the station desktop" Now, many of use would love this, especially if you happen to have a neighbor that has asked a PV installation cowboy to install an S9+ noiosy environment up to 200 MHz. So yes, there are people who can locate the deck at a different place. Now, I have a 7851 so there won't be a replacement action but to be honest, having it split, is a wonderful idea for some people. And yes, that S9+ noise is from my neighbor. (Busy trying to fix this with him)
ICOM's for the USA serial numbers start at 1000. Anything under 1000 are prototypes. At least that was the way they were when I worked there back in the day.
If I had the location / antenna infrastructure to justify it, this would be on my list to buy -- over any Flex. I'm loving it. I think this will go over very well with consumers.
It's basically what I predicted it would be. A modern SDR replacement for the 7851. Only thing I missed was the remote RF deck. Not that it's cheap but it's significantly cheaper than I thought it would be. I assumed it would be more than what the 7851 was when it was discontinued. Wow, was I wrong. It's less than half of what the 7851 was going for. I already have my back channels preorder in. Countdown to delivery has begun. And since I'm a follower of Dave Jones (EEVBlog) from down under I live by his principle. "Don't turn it on, tear it apart." Can't wait to tear this beast apart.
@MrAnon-g7m it definitely is not a replacement, people that have the 785x generally will recognize this as a step back and what others may have said too: it's more between the 76xx and the 78xx series. Say a 7700 replacement. It's just not your cup of tea. (And no, I won't trade in the 7851)
REference around minute 6:40, actually, you are limited to about 100m when directly connecting the controller and the RF deck. Connecting the RF deck and the Controller (through the LAN connector on the RF Deck,) is different.
Nice to see new offerings. Looks like a 7610 with an added 990 sub screen. Personally would buy a 7610 and an amp. Currently love my 7610 / 890 so will pass. I am patiently waiting for a 990 replacement as my next upgrade.
for whatever reason, I think the 990 won't have a follow-up. I don't see Kenwood doing anything useful anymore. Keep the 890. What's your thought on this re Kenwood?
At almost twice the price of a 7610, is it worth it? That is the real question. I have been considering a 7610 for a while. I guess I should wait and see at this point.
@@chuckdebian2205 CESSB should be banned, all this voodoo crap. The rules are - use the BW (and power) needed to get things done. If you want a crappy TX sound, buy something else Chuck. We also don't know the numbers yet RX wise. Think you have a totally different mindset when it comes to rigs (referring to the measuing of signal strength too)
While I love the remote RF deck design, I don't see enough difference between this and IC-7610 to warrant double the cost. I'd instead use my computer to control the 7610 remotely. I would love to see an IC-7100 replacement with this design or an upgraded IC-705. I love Icom's innovation, though!
they won't kill off the 705 anytime soon. The 7610 remove controlled is by the way different from a head. Latency comes into play here and we'renot eventalking about the way you control it. The 7100 can be used with the separated head and additional hardware so that can be done already for quite a few years.I know people having the head and some hw in the suitcase while the rig itself stays in the Netherlands. Works pretty well for voice/D*
I am most confused by the suggested retail price. Taking the example of the 7300 for instance it is about £1000 here in the UK but with 20% sales tax it is about £1200. Japanese domestic market versions (not identical) are available for about 30% less. Not sure how much this radio will retail for here in the UK. High duty cycle is attractive, I am sure part of the equation is that with a remote head radio more fan noise is tolerable. Looks to be priced keenly in comparison to similar rigs.
Ok perhaps it's insignificant detail but the monitor connector is a joke... Its not 10€ Baofeng we're talking about here. Will soon VGA make a comeback? For this price there should be like 2 or 3 different outputs... WTF
Do hams want to communicate or just have the latest flashy box to impress their friends? A bit like MS Office - lots of features which no one will ever use
@@mattbw-G5MAT The price quoted in US $ doesn't include state tax, which varies depending on which state anyway. So my comment stands, it has always been this way with conversion to UK pricing. I don't think that Icom UK has stated an MSRP yet.
I don’t see anything about adjusting the EQ for high fidelity like the Anan where we can listen and operate at 4 k wide, which gives much better fidelity. With the adaptive pre distortion (Pure Signal) we run clean!!
this kind of use on the bands should be banned. The TX BW is hard coded and that stays that way for a long time. If you want to sound better, use AM or FM.
@@RoelandJansen ESSB Audio with either 4kc or 8kc wide. There is no bandwidth limit, just common sense. ESSB Is a Mode just like AM, SSB. FM ect... Nowhere in Part 97 is the phrase "communications quality phone signal," or words to that effect, legally defined. Neither is the maximum bandwidth for an AM or SSB signal, other than on 60 Meters. Common sense must prevail, and one should never run a 8-20 kHz wide transmission in a crowded band, but in no way is it illegal. ORDER - Rulemaking under Part 97 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended to Establish Technical Standards for Certain Amateur Radio Telephony Transmissions
@@RoelandJansenfortunately this was already tested when a bunch of lids tried to have our bandwidth locked and it was interrupted that there is no violation in going as wide as you like as long as you are not interfering in bandpass that’s in use.
@@va3kbc if there was common sense people would not use it. Also There is regulation for us here where you only should use whatever is needed to make the contacts. Now I know that people with a small reproduction organ, love to talk with legal limit power even if they are one street away, and that makes sense. Compensation. Also, as said before, with AM and FM you can definitely make the signale better without surious emissions > 2.4 kHz wide. But hey, that's my opinion.
@@kb2uka575 and that's exactly the issue, you cannot know if someone else has this interference. And again, essb is a compensation issue just like using legal mimit power when not needed.
i want to HEAR & see first that the IC-7760 would hear anything more than the IC-7300 can, i doubt that there is much it can hear the 7300 can't. Icom IC-7300 is best radio.
Other than ego or bragging rights it does not make any sense spending that much money. Reminds me of folks purchasing a new high end digital camera every year, notice their pictures never improve. This IC-7760 is a new play-pretty, users will not be able to contact more folks than they can now with much less expensive devices. Keep in mind: "Bragging rights lasts until the next play-pretty is released."
First of all of course the price is outrageous second of all I want a big bass radio on my desk. That head unit should be able to attach to the base of the radio. I also seen the specs that the transmit bandwidth is only 2.7 icom come on.
@@todd8155 From to city to the countryside 50km away it is only 2-3ms via two fiber connections, I bet that would be doable. But once you start routing via other ISPs or other type connections the latency will start to become an issue I guess.
It looks like Icom have taken some pointers from the Kenwood TS-990, particularly with the second display. It's still very much a menu-driven radio which I'm not a huge fan of from an operating perspective. Although saying that, the only Icom radio I own is the IC-9700. I certainly don't like the new Yaesu radio's. I'd be very interested in seeing what Kenwood push out as a replacement - if they do indeed do so. Looking at the specs of this radio, it could be something to at least spend some time playing with when it is released.
@MrAnon-g7m I was in the market for a radio late last year as the front-end of my FT-2000D had (again) died. I really tried hard to love the FTDX-101 but it just wasn't there. I don't like menu systems being the primary way to access functions on a radio and it just felt too plasticky for me, having grown up coveting the Yaesu radio's of the 70's and 80's. I knew I'd missed the boat on a new TS-990 but one came up and I bought it. There isn't a lot I don't like about it. You rarely need to go into the main menu as there are physical controls for most things you want to modify during operation and holding a button brings up a context-relevant dialogue with graphics that make sense. Having designed user interfaces myself in the past, I'm really not a fan of software engineers developing UI's for software engineers - the same applies to so many modern domestic UI based systems; get actual real-world users to test it, give feedback rinse and repeat until you have something usable. I digress, this is a hobby-horse for me. I love the second display that Icom have also adopted in this model. The noise reduction in the TS-990 is REALLY good. I hope they give us a successor to the 990.
Yeh nah!! I suppose the Boomers can afford this high priced stuff, but for the rest of us plebs, 95% of the fun can still be had with an IC-7300. I aint in the hobby for bragging rights!
I have the 7851 and control-wise it's a major step back. If it was a head with all the controls on it, I would think you are right. This definitely isn't a 7851 replaced. Not even close.
because a DVI to HDMI (etc, costs you almost nothing as an add-on. There is no need to do different. WHat's next? VGA? Oh I cannot connect my displayport etc blah. Given the resolution and eventual upfront costs for a feature that many people don't even use, is apparently not to be justified. If you want to connect, get yourself that 2 euro/dollar plug. I did. And my 7851 doesn't even have been connected for an hour on an enternal display since 2016. (YMMV)
My problem with a lot of modern transceivers that are dependent on PCs is that they use Windows not Linux. Considering that a lot of Amateurs use Linux and that Linux is often the preferred choice for techies (which a lot of Amateurs are) the major manufacturers should cater for Linux users.
@@HamRadioDX not with a remote deck. So they can sit by the 7760’s rf deck when they want to do vhf/uhf? I think the idea is that some people would like to have all the antenna clutter in a basement or attic and the 7760 head upstairs in the living space.
@@HamRadioDX Right. Now we’re up to 10k USD and limited to 10w. Many people want the 2m/70cm to simply get on a repeater, and their main activity is HF. So that’s why people are griping. I love ICOM and think this new rig is outstanding, but I understand the griping. I’m just pointing out that there is a market for this, and if ICOM doesn’t provide it to protect other products, someone else will. I use a 705 with many triplexers and three amplifiers (hard rock 50+ and UHF/VHF amplifiers). I remotely control via sdr-control. If this new QRP all-band yaesu can be similarly controlled remotely, I can easily swap out the 705 with existing hardware to gain dual receive. While not an inexpensive setup, it offers less expensive upgrade paths but obviously fewer features. It’s kind of a modern 7100 replacement, which people are looking for.
@@CatholicChickAZ me too my 705 connected to a modified Sailor marine amplifier gives 200 watts in all hf bands. I am mobile portable whenever I want, the dual use is available here. De vu3mes.
You can buy a Yaesu FTDX-101MP for substantially less money and likely better specs. Or the Icom 7610 will compete with it with regard to the specs that serious Contesters use: DR-3@2khz, RMDR and BDR. Currently available rigs like the Elecraft K4D offer more for the $ with easier remote operation and a better pan adapter. Icom historically leverages its pre existing designs for new things.
I don't understand why icom would do such a thing with a radio that is going to cost like 10000$+... where they simply could have remodel the 7100 with a proper head and color screen, they would sell thousands just like the 7300... instead they are only going to sell a couple 7760 instead of making a LOT of sales with a way less expensive radio that the mass could buy...
The 7300 and 9700 won't be around forever. With over 100,00 7300's already sold and no doubt tens of thousands of 9700's already sold, I don't think Icom would be too worried about losing any sales of either model to a new radio that combined both. The 7300 and 9700 will be eventually replaced. hence the need for a new radio to replace them. The 7760 is not the answer. It's just another HF+50 radio with an extra 100W that is ridiculously overpriced. I can't see 100,000 7760's ever being sold.
$6,000 ?!!! ok so we all can agree that Icom does put out a high quality product. reliable and good power output as well as good receive. But no 70cm or 2m capability even with a separate head controller? is it on optional upgrade for another $1k? Im sorry but personally, I feel they are keeping prices high to keep a dying workforce employed. they are a great product but , guess we need to wait for a youtuber with enough balls to buy one to get a decent review for it. I can tell you I would rather risk the Yaesu ftdx-101mp for half the cost than to risk a chance that the Icom would outperform the receive of the 101 at double the cost. cant wait to see how this sells.
Prediction for 100th anniversary... SSB, AM, FM and and inbuilt RTTY. But never a CW decoder ever and never any other digital mode anyone actually uses, and no platform for users to create / install their own application.
lmao at everyone referencing the 7610 and comparing it to that radio. Did it ever occur to anyone that the 7760 has 77 in the model number and therefore might just be the replacement for the 7700🤪🤪🤪
why? a good idea is something to follow up on. I used a flex/maestro and I can tell you that they almost invented crashes and latencies. Yaesu made a major leap forward when it comes to HF TRX. Should we now say "Shame on you yaesu!"?
@@HamRadioDX I think as we have seen with the 710s using the DVI, hard to find monitors and issues with the adapters. Plus as we all know adapters add more bulk and another element of failure. If I can buy a $300 laptop with a HDMI connector why not a $900 or $6000 radio?
So another fail on price by Icom. IC905 and this monstrosity with unaffordable price tags. You could buy five IC 7300s instead of this with a power supply for each.
The IC-7300 sales covered the cost of development. Just gouging the hobby market like any other hobby equipment provider. $20000 for a top of the line atv or snowmobile. This radio is a bragging piece.
@@HamRadioDX part of being a successful business is being able to develop a product and manufacture it cheaply enough so they can sell it at a price that is appealing and still make a profit. Either ICOM can't do that or they are gouging.
Thanks for the video. Please show the price in Euro next time. I fully understand you show the price in GPB or AUD for your viewers, but only 66 million and 22 million do use these currencies, while EUR is used by 342 million people.
Опять они всунули туда эту ручку RF 😢. Зачем , если там есть ATT и P.AMP ? Почему не сделать вместо ее ручку как на сдр AGC-T ???? Короче это как 7610 . Спасибо , не надо мне такое радио. Еще наверно и ручки болтаются как у 7610. 😂
Nope. I see why you put the price at the end of the video, I would have clicked off at the MSRP announcement. I don’t care if it cooks my dinner and folds my laundry. I’m not paying $6,100 for a radio that won’t even do all bands and modes.
only 6,000.00 dollars us. nice ill take two LOL. NOT!!!! won't be in my price range anytime soon. That and yes reminds me of flex radio some but way too many cable outlets on the back of the faceplate. They should have made it wireless like the flex.
I can't wait to have it mars modded for CB, then on to 11 meter modded (OM Power) OM 4001c Power amps in one of their daisy chain kits (OM10c) power combiner for over 20kw..... swing 50 kw easy......
@@HamRadioDX why would it be a nightmare. If you use modern WiFi standards and you are not stuck in your fathers WiFi you c 15:53 an get perfectly low latency and with p
Prioritize packets you can precisely predict the latency. It is a complete miss from Icom as is the DVI port. Icom fanboys are making these lame excuses about licensing etc. especially at this price point. Heck 100 $ TVs have hdmi nowadays as well as $60 laptops like the maestro evolve.
@@HamRadioDX Hi, thanks for asking. I'd like to see true innovation. Something new, not something re-used. New tools developed using AI . . . Complete FT-8 abilities built into the unit, no computer required. An antenna tuner that is more than 3-to-1 . . . There are many things that could be new in a transceiver. They are just not being brave enough to invest in true radio R&D. Dave, W7DGJ
Nope. I see why you put the price at the end of the video, I would have clicked off at the MSRP announcement. I don’t care if it cooks my dinner and folds my laundry. I’m not paying $6,100 for a radio that won’t even do all bands and modes.
Why I Choose Icom For My Ham Radio Shack ➡ua-cam.com/video/hc9i83KxdSA/v-deo.html
More Icom ➡ ua-cam.com/video/fmfBSfWgSqw/v-deo.html
Can’t wait to dangle that RF Deck off the top of a POTA20 mast and eliminate cable loss entirely!
You will go far, think of the $$$$ you save on RG-8U !!
I want one. I should start dropping hints to the XYL now so in 3 to 5 years she may let me have one lol. The 7300 still going well as is the 9700. I am looking at setting up a remote station down south on top of a friends farm about 40KM south of my QTH, its a 400ha sheep and beef farm and 280M above sea level and less than 1KM away from the sea. It has very low RF noise there. The 7300 would be nice to go down there for the remote setup. Thanks for the info. 73 ZL4SY Norm
Remote RF module makes a lot of sense technically but mind numbingly expensive
I love the remote RF deck idea. Unfortunately, it needs to trickle down to more affordable options.
Sure a nice radio! I just walked out to the yet uncollected skip in the yard and pulled out the better few DVI monitors I could not even give away! One thing I would like to know: How well are the unused antenna sockets earthed? For me to know what is going on on the bands is something I would like to see on my standard 4k monitor. Then I need ONLY one audio out and perhaps a mouse is something I prefer over a tagged touch screen. Still good work and kudos to them Icom engineers giving it all.
The IC-905 uses a custom PoE setup to power the RF deck and is why it must be connected directly to the control head. With this IC-7760 there is no PoE as both the RF desk and the controller have their own power source.
Yeah thus why it's cool that it works over LAN
I think this type of config is the future. Being able to mount the guts at a point closer to the antenna and have a smaller head in the shack is awesome! Love it!
No one can place outside a 6000 $ RF deck requiring AC power by their tower. The control head has at most a 9 m cable. The placement of a RF deck 9 m closer to the antenna does not significantly improve antenna matching or coax loss. This is a top end HF transceiver marketed to Contesters and Dxers. Icom needs to release DR-3@2 KHz, BDR and RMDR before serious Contesters will consider it.
Innovation!
@@RSwrightMD the understanding here is that you can use an ethernetcable of max abt 328 ft, abt 90m. According to the skinny information, it can be ised within a network, meaning that you probably can even get it further away.
"A control cable (3 m, 9.8 ft) is supplied with the transceiver, and a commercially available LAN cable* can be used to install the RF deck in a more remote location. It enables the RF deck to be placed in a rack or other location away from the station desktop"
Now, many of use would love this, especially if you happen to have a neighbor that has asked a PV installation cowboy to install an S9+ noiosy environment up to 200 MHz.
So yes, there are people who can locate the deck at a different place. Now, I have a 7851 so there won't be a replacement action but to be honest, having it split, is a wonderful idea for some people. And yes, that S9+ noise is from my neighbor.
(Busy trying to fix this with him)
ICOM's for the USA serial numbers start at 1000. Anything under 1000 are prototypes. At least that was the way they were when I worked there back in the day.
Staying with my 7610 and 7700
If I had the location / antenna infrastructure to justify it, this would be on my list to buy -- over any Flex. I'm loving it. I think this will go over very well with consumers.
my thoughts as well. Maybe in the future as an additional righ (and see off older rigs, not the 7851)
My next POTA rig.
It's basically what I predicted it would be. A modern SDR replacement for the 7851. Only thing I missed was the remote RF deck. Not that it's cheap but it's significantly cheaper than I thought it would be. I assumed it would be more than what the 7851 was when it was discontinued. Wow, was I wrong. It's less than half of what the 7851 was going for. I already have my back channels preorder in. Countdown to delivery has begun. And since I'm a follower of Dave Jones (EEVBlog) from down under I live by his principle. "Don't turn it on, tear it apart." Can't wait to tear this beast apart.
@MrAnon-g7m it definitely is not a replacement, people that have the 785x generally will recognize this as a step back and what others may have said too: it's more between the 76xx and the 78xx series. Say a 7700 replacement.
It's just not your cup of tea. (And no, I won't trade in the 7851)
Thanks for sharing the newest radio from ICOM. The 7610 and the 7300 has the same visual notch filter in the audio scope screen.
Thanks for the info!
REference around minute 6:40, actually, you are limited to about 100m when directly connecting the controller and the RF deck.
Connecting the RF deck and the Controller (through the LAN connector on the RF Deck,) is different.
Remaining on my wishlist:
- N connector instead of PL
- GPS input (for frequency reference)
- >0 dBm TX output for 2200m/630m bands
The radio does have a GPS 10 MHz reference input on the back of the RF deck.
@@HamRadioDX Yes, but then i have a GPSDO lying around. Thanks for the presentation!
Just guessing - the 3mtr control cable probably powers the head but if you do a lan hookup then you will need a power pack on the head unit.
They give you the power supply (15VDC) for the head unit, incuded with the radio.
it has a separate PSU for the head; the control cable is to be used for further away. a 3 m cable if supplied so that you can start immediately.
Have they fixed the problem the 7610 had with the battery backup for the clock ? MW0XTK
Its missing some rear pannel i/o making it a poor replacement for the IC-7851 os i believe your right. This fits inbetween the 7610 and the 7851
The use of 7760 naming suggests it may be a mid level rig replacing the 7700 as an experiment before bringing out the 7860
It indeed fits in between
Nice to see new offerings. Looks like a 7610 with an added 990 sub screen. Personally would buy a 7610 and an amp. Currently love my 7610 / 890 so will pass. I am patiently waiting for a 990 replacement as my next upgrade.
for whatever reason, I think the 990 won't have a follow-up. I don't see Kenwood doing anything useful anymore. Keep the 890. What's your thought on this re Kenwood?
That price is insane for what that thing does.
Typical Japan.
@@someguy782 typical Icom
@@chuckdebian2205 how do you know the dynamic range of that thing??🤨 It hasn't even been released yet (today in September 1st 2024).
Now that they have built another super expensive radio try building one that is affordable there is a market for that.
Christ it costs more than my first 3 cars combined!
The 3 cars I have now don't add up to that!
You boys need to step up your game. LOL
@@hogluvr1 LOL my car costs more now, but the beaters I had when I was 17 didn't cost that much...(I'm in my 50s now for context)
No need to boast 😂. Probably costs more than all the cars I have owned haha….27 years worth. 😂. (Edit quick tally 13 cars or so).
At almost twice the price of a 7610, is it worth it? That is the real question. I have been considering a 7610 for a while. I guess I should wait and see at this point.
@@chuckdebian2205 CESSB should be banned, all this voodoo crap. The rules are - use the BW (and power) needed to get things done.
If you want a crappy TX sound, buy something else Chuck. We also don't know the numbers yet RX wise. Think you have a totally different mindset when it comes to rigs (referring to the measuing of signal strength too)
While I love the remote RF deck design, I don't see enough difference between this and IC-7610 to warrant double the cost. I'd instead use my computer to control the 7610 remotely. I would love to see an IC-7100 replacement with this design or an upgraded IC-705. I love Icom's innovation, though!
they won't kill off the 705 anytime soon.
The 7610 remove controlled is by the way different from a head. Latency comes into play here and we'renot eventalking about the way you control it.
The 7100 can be used with the separated head and additional hardware so that can be done already for quite a few years.I know people having the head and some hw in the suitcase while the rig itself stays in the Netherlands. Works pretty well for voice/D*
I am most confused by the suggested retail price. Taking the example of the 7300 for instance it is about £1000 here in the UK but with 20% sales tax it is about £1200. Japanese domestic market versions (not identical) are available for about 30% less.
Not sure how much this radio will retail for here in the UK.
High duty cycle is attractive, I am sure part of the equation is that with a remote head radio more fan noise is tolerable.
Looks to be priced keenly in comparison to similar rigs.
I was excited... ...until I saw the MSRP... ...then I wasn't...
: (
Not sure about the production cost for these, but if they could sell it at half the price they would triple the sale figures easily.
The IC-7851 had an MSRP of 12k or 13k, so i wasn't surprised ^^
Ok perhaps it's insignificant detail but the monitor connector is a joke... Its not 10€ Baofeng we're talking about here. Will soon VGA make a comeback? For this price there should be like 2 or 3 different outputs... WTF
Do hams want to communicate or just have the latest flashy box to impress their friends? A bit like MS Office - lots of features which no one will ever use
I agree completely!!
Hams want flashy gear and cool toys. They communicate via email and WhatsApp
Introduced, not released.
Sadly the conversions never work in the uk, tech companies just take the dollar number straight into £. So probably £6k, hope I’m proven wrong.
Because of VAT being added at 20%
@@BrianMorrison yes but RRP should include VAT.
@@mattbw-G5MAT The price quoted in US $ doesn't include state tax, which varies depending on which state anyway. So my comment stands, it has always been this way with conversion to UK pricing. I don't think that Icom UK has stated an MSRP yet.
I don’t see anything about adjusting the EQ for high fidelity like the Anan where we can listen and operate at 4 k wide, which gives much better fidelity. With the adaptive pre distortion (Pure Signal) we run clean!!
this kind of use on the bands should be banned. The TX BW is hard coded and that stays that way for a long time. If you want to sound better, use AM or FM.
@@RoelandJansen ESSB Audio with either 4kc or 8kc wide.
There is no bandwidth limit, just common sense.
ESSB Is a Mode just like AM, SSB. FM ect...
Nowhere in Part 97 is the phrase "communications quality phone signal," or words to that effect, legally defined. Neither is the maximum bandwidth for an AM or SSB signal, other than on 60 Meters. Common sense must prevail, and one should never run a 8-20 kHz wide transmission in a crowded band, but in no way is it illegal.
ORDER - Rulemaking under Part 97 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended to Establish Technical Standards for Certain Amateur Radio Telephony Transmissions
@@RoelandJansenfortunately this was already tested when a bunch of lids tried to have our bandwidth locked and it was interrupted that there is no violation in going as wide as you like as long as you are not interfering in bandpass that’s in use.
@@va3kbc if there was common sense people would not use it. Also There is regulation for us here where you only should use whatever is needed to make the contacts. Now I know that people with a small reproduction organ, love to talk with legal limit power even if they are one street away, and that makes sense. Compensation.
Also, as said before, with AM and FM you can definitely make the signale better without surious emissions > 2.4 kHz wide. But hey, that's my opinion.
@@kb2uka575 and that's exactly the issue, you cannot know if someone else has this interference. And again, essb is a compensation issue just like using legal mimit power when not needed.
a good walk through lots more out there the new kenwood and new yaesu
The new Kenwood looks a little dated... 1990 rang and developed the head unit!
So just a beefed up version of the 7610 with a price to match. Nothing to replace the old 7300.
They probably think with the 7300, if it ain't broke don't fix it - just yet..
7300 is the best beginner radio on the market, it has out sold every other radio for a reason .
@@saltire546 at 100k+ sales yes. And still going.
i want to HEAR & see first that the IC-7760 would hear anything more than the IC-7300 can, i doubt that there is much it can hear the 7300 can't. Icom IC-7300 is best radio.
So, a flex competitor.
Other than ego or bragging rights it does not make any sense spending that much money. Reminds me of folks purchasing a new high end digital camera every year, notice their pictures never improve. This IC-7760 is a new play-pretty, users will not be able to contact more folks than they can now with much less expensive devices. Keep in mind: "Bragging rights lasts until the next play-pretty is released."
It's a beast! I'd buy it if I had the cash, but I dont. Lol
First of all of course the price is outrageous second of all I want a big bass radio on my desk. That head unit should be able to attach to the base of the radio. I also seen the specs that the transmit bandwidth is only 2.7 icom come on.
I reckon you could hook them up remotely via VPN/tunnelling too.
That's exactly what I'd be looking to do :)
Latency...
@@todd8155 not talking other side of the world here. You'd only be looking at 25-30ms depending on where you are
@@todd8155 From to city to the countryside 50km away it is only 2-3ms via two fiber connections, I bet that would be doable.
But once you start routing via other ISPs or other type connections the latency will start to become an issue I guess.
100% doable I think
The spec,s you put up show the 7 m band plan as 7.000 to 7.200, is that going to be up to 300 for Australia?
I would imagine so yeah
It looks like Icom have taken some pointers from the Kenwood TS-990, particularly with the second display. It's still very much a menu-driven radio which I'm not a huge fan of from an operating perspective. Although saying that, the only Icom radio I own is the IC-9700. I certainly don't like the new Yaesu radio's.
I'd be very interested in seeing what Kenwood push out as a replacement - if they do indeed do so. Looking at the specs of this radio, it could be something to at least spend some time playing with when it is released.
@MrAnon-g7m I was in the market for a radio late last year as the front-end of my FT-2000D had (again) died.
I really tried hard to love the FTDX-101 but it just wasn't there. I don't like menu systems being the primary way to access functions on a radio and it just felt too plasticky for me, having grown up coveting the Yaesu radio's of the 70's and 80's. I knew I'd missed the boat on a new TS-990 but one came up and I bought it.
There isn't a lot I don't like about it. You rarely need to go into the main menu as there are physical controls for most things you want to modify during operation and holding a button brings up a context-relevant dialogue with graphics that make sense. Having designed user interfaces myself in the past, I'm really not a fan of software engineers developing UI's for software engineers - the same applies to so many modern domestic UI based systems; get actual real-world users to test it, give feedback rinse and repeat until you have something usable. I digress, this is a hobby-horse for me. I love the second display that Icom have also adopted in this model. The noise reduction in the TS-990 is REALLY good. I hope they give us a successor to the 990.
ICOM USA does not have the 7760 listed yet.
Hopefully it will be as durable as my 706mk2g is
Yeh nah!!
I suppose the Boomers can afford this high priced stuff, but for the rest of us plebs, 95% of the fun can still be had with an IC-7300. I aint in the hobby for bragging rights!
This radio is specifically marketed toward DX'ers and contesters. Nothing wrong with a 7300 though!
Looks like maybe a replacement/upgrade to the IC-7851
I have the 7851 and control-wise it's a major step back. If it was a head with all the controls on it, I would think you are right. This definitely isn't a 7851 replaced. Not even close.
Any good reason why there is no state of the art connector for an external display?
because a DVI to HDMI (etc, costs you almost nothing as an add-on. There is no need to do different. WHat's next? VGA? Oh I cannot connect my displayport etc blah.
Given the resolution and eventual upfront costs for a feature that many people don't even use, is apparently not to be justified. If you want to connect, get yourself that 2 euro/dollar plug. I did. And my 7851 doesn't even have been connected for an hour on an enternal display since 2016. (YMMV)
@@RoelandJansen, the question is more technical, thank you anyway. 73
@@DO5MN enlighten me.
What cannot be done with DVI-D compared to what it outputs? Just wndering why people make such an issue out of it.
My problem with a lot of modern transceivers that are dependent on PCs is that they use Windows not Linux. Considering that a lot of Amateurs use Linux and that Linux is often the preferred choice for techies (which a lot of Amateurs are) the major manufacturers should cater for Linux users.
Any improvement to the DNR? An area Icom have fallen so far behind...
They should have included 2M and 70Cm, and maybe more.
And a Kilowatt output ;) We always dream of more. You really want a separate VHF/UHF for home use.
IC-9700 does that
@@HamRadioDX not with a remote deck. So they can sit by the 7760’s rf deck when they want to do vhf/uhf? I think the idea is that some people would like to have all the antenna clutter in a basement or attic and the 7760 head upstairs in the living space.
IC-905 then
@@HamRadioDX Right. Now we’re up to 10k USD and limited to 10w. Many people want the 2m/70cm to simply get on a repeater, and their main activity is HF. So that’s why people are griping. I love ICOM and think this new rig is outstanding, but I understand the griping. I’m just pointing out that there is a market for this, and if ICOM doesn’t provide it to protect other products, someone else will. I use a 705 with many triplexers and three amplifiers (hard rock 50+ and UHF/VHF amplifiers). I remotely control via sdr-control. If this new QRP all-band yaesu can be similarly controlled remotely, I can easily swap out the 705 with existing hardware to gain dual receive. While not an inexpensive setup, it offers less expensive upgrade paths but obviously fewer features. It’s kind of a modern 7100 replacement, which people are looking for.
Just when you thought things could not get any more ridiculous. 73’
Why ridiculous?
@@HamRadioDX 6 thousand dollars US. The radio is worth about 4500.oo to 5 grand. If it had the 9700 features included, maybe.
@@chrisdelong2932 So you know the production and development costs that Icom pay for this radio then?
Nice sub-display. They are trying to bridge that gap between traditional knobs and buttons and what a SDR program brings. I like it
It’s always best to have a blurred section over the retail price 😂
So no 70MHz 4 Metre band support?
Not sure yet. 70 MHz is a band that only limited countries have access too...
This radio replaces the ICOM 7700 which was a 200 Watt Radio.
The price 😳 though, things could be worse. I could have bought a ic7610 recently.
ICOM using DVI to save money on HDMI licencing on a $6k radio 🤣
If you really want a low latency just get two media converters and a big ass spool of fiber optic since it’s so cheap these days.
Anyone who doesn't need a dual receiver; this radio will be a passable thing. As it is 7300 and 705 working perfectly at the moment.
Yep, I’m sticking with the 7300!
@@CatholicChickAZ me too my 705 connected to a modified Sailor marine amplifier gives 200 watts in all hf bands. I am mobile portable whenever I want, the dual use is available here. De vu3mes.
@@CatholicChickAZ my 705 connected to a modified Sailor marine amplifier gives 200 watts already with 4 watts drive.
I'll keep my 7610 and 7100 for lower costs more features...
The price will mean that very few will ever own this. Looks like a wonderful radio but my wife would loose it if I bought this.
You can buy a Yaesu FTDX-101MP for substantially less money and likely better specs. Or the Icom 7610 will compete with it with regard to the specs that serious Contesters use: DR-3@2khz, RMDR and BDR. Currently available rigs like the Elecraft K4D offer more for the $ with easier remote operation and a better pan adapter. Icom historically leverages its pre existing designs for new things.
Take your stones out of your wife's purse.
@RSwrightMD he said he had a Wife...not a "partner". 😉
I'd be more interested if it had 2 meters capability, or 2 meters/70CM...
No, because its a HF radio. for 2m allmode there is the IC-9700.
I don't understand why icom would do such a thing with a radio that is going to cost like 10000$+... where they simply could have remodel the 7100 with a proper head and color screen, they would sell thousands just like the 7300... instead they are only going to sell a couple 7760 instead of making a LOT of sales with a way less expensive radio that the mass could buy...
If this thing also had 2/70/23 it would be a truly new unique radio (7300 and 9700 combined). What a wasted opportunity to have done that.
Wouldn't that take away sales from the 7300 and 9700 (especially the 9700 which isn't an old model)
The 7300 and 9700 won't be around forever. With over 100,00 7300's already sold and no doubt tens of thousands of 9700's already sold, I don't think Icom would be too worried about losing any sales of either model to a new radio that combined both. The 7300 and 9700 will be eventually replaced. hence the need for a new radio to replace them. The 7760 is not the answer. It's just another HF+50 radio with an extra 100W that is ridiculously overpriced. I can't see 100,000 7760's ever being sold.
A new IC-7700
It will probably haveva price north of $5000 usd
controlled by Cloud system, direct sampling, direct generating RF power
And features 1800 fonts options that nobody will ever use. 😂
Don’t forget the outdated video port. It has everything! 😂😂
So of course we all skipped to "24:50 Price!".... 🤭
lol of course!
Why an outdated video port?
Why something else?
$6,000 ?!!! ok so we all can agree that Icom does put out a high quality product. reliable and good power output as well as good receive. But no 70cm or 2m capability even with a separate head controller? is it on optional upgrade for another $1k? Im sorry but personally, I feel they are keeping prices high to keep a dying workforce employed. they are a great product but , guess we need to wait for a youtuber with enough balls to buy one to get a decent review for it. I can tell you I would rather risk the Yaesu ftdx-101mp for half the cost than to risk a chance that the Icom would outperform the receive of the 101 at double the cost. cant wait to see how this sells.
Or they could just give a UA-camr one to do a video on… now there is a novel idea 🤔
Prediction for 100th anniversary...
SSB, AM, FM and and inbuilt RTTY. But never a CW decoder ever and never any other digital mode anyone actually uses, and no platform for users to create / install their own application.
I didn't see a ext display connector.
Back of the controller. DVI-D
lmao at everyone referencing the 7610 and comparing it to that radio. Did it ever occur to anyone that the 7760 has 77 in the model number and therefore might just be the replacement for the 7700🤪🤪🤪
Considering Icom reference this radio in direct comparison to the 7610.. no
@@HamRadioDX 🤣🤣🤣
Is Icom making a "copy cat" version of the Flex+Maestro? Shame Icom!!
why? a good idea is something to follow up on. I used a flex/maestro and I can tell you that they almost invented crashes and latencies.
Yaesu made a major leap forward when it comes to HF TRX. Should we now say "Shame on you yaesu!"?
Over $6000 for the Icom 7760 and they still use the outdated and painful DVI connector to save a buck on licensing.
Why painful?
@@HamRadioDX I think as we have seen with the 710s using the DVI, hard to find monitors and issues with the adapters. Plus as we all know adapters add more bulk and another element of failure. If I can buy a $300 laptop with a HDMI connector why not a $900 or $6000 radio?
Is it so awkward for you to do one more click and show the price converted also in EUR?
Yep it is
So another fail on price by Icom. IC905 and this monstrosity with unaffordable price tags. You could buy five IC 7300s instead of this with a power supply for each.
I dared assuming the price before end of the video and had roughly half of the revealed sum….
Do you think they are making a massive profit on this, that it's cheap to make and innovate? Or that it's expensive to develop?
The IC-7300 sales covered the cost of development. Just gouging the hobby market like any other hobby equipment provider. $20000 for a top of the line atv or snowmobile. This radio is a bragging piece.
@@HamRadioDX part of being a successful business is being able to develop a product and manufacture it cheaply enough so they can sell it at a price that is appealing and still make a profit. Either ICOM can't do that or they are gouging.
Yep, now I’m waiting for a price reduction on 7300 and I’ll order 2, Yah!!
I I think has given up on the mobile market. Like pit the 7300 in a 706/7000 size box!
And the V/UHF line is weak. Klingon weak.
$6,0000? Is that correct?
Major failure from the big 2 on there recently two radios the released not going full blown sdr sadly they ask 3 times what it’s worth
Full blown sdr as in direct conversion does not make it better.
it looks nice but i bet it,s not Cheap
Nice idea but the USB is just silly these days. Why not USB C, especially at the price.
Because it's brittle?
No 7851 replacement here.
I actually thought it would be - turns out I was wrong! 7610 "upgrade"
Thanks for the video. Please show the price in Euro next time. I fully understand you show the price in GPB or AUD for your viewers, but only 66 million and 22 million do use these currencies, while EUR is used by 342 million people.
A simple conversion from AUD to Euros is all you have to do 😂
Hopefully not a $13,000.00 radio.
Опять они всунули туда эту ручку RF 😢. Зачем , если там есть ATT и P.AMP ? Почему не сделать вместо ее ручку как на сдр AGC-T ???? Короче это как 7610 . Спасибо , не надо мне такое радио. Еще наверно и ручки болтаются как у 7610. 😂
No 2m/70cm/23cm or other killer features. Huge disappointment in my opinion. 100W IC-705 (for a good price) would be much better.
I agree. The remote rf deck is particularly useful for VHF/UHF.
It's not an all band radio.. If you include 2/70 and 23 into the same box, then you kill off some of your other models in the lineup.
@@ch716 that's why there is a 905.
@@RoelandJansen if you’re okay with 10W or mast mounted amplifiers
I have 5/10W (705), 100 (7300/7000), 200W (7851). Contests I do with 5W.
Nope. I see why you put the price at the end of the video, I would have clicked off at the MSRP announcement. I don’t care if it cooks my dinner and folds my laundry. I’m not paying $6,100 for a radio that won’t even do all bands and modes.
877,800 yen is kinda steep but im not surprised
only 6,000.00 dollars us. nice ill take two LOL. NOT!!!! won't be in my price range anytime soon. That and yes reminds me of flex radio some but way too many cable outlets on the back of the faceplate. They should have made it wireless like the flex.
Its too rich for my blood...
I can't wait to have it mars modded for CB, then on to 11 meter modded (OM Power) OM 4001c Power amps in one of their daisy chain kits (OM10c) power combiner for over 20kw..... swing 50 kw easy......
When you spoke of the price, you converted the “with tax price”. The without tax price is 798,000 yen.
Okay
Lol $6000???
At that price point it’s a loser, no WiFi???.? No HDMI???? These are simple things and they just leave them out????
Why do you need WiFi if it literally has to run over LAN?
The connectivity issues between the controller and RF deck with WiFi would be a nightmare
@@HamRadioDX no support for 4 meter band or 70 mhz.
@@HamRadioDX why would it be a nightmare. If you use modern WiFi standards and you are not stuck in your fathers WiFi you c 15:53 an get perfectly low latency and with p
Prioritize packets you can precisely predict the latency. It is a complete miss from Icom as is the DVI port. Icom fanboys are making these lame excuses about licensing etc. especially at this price point. Heck 100 $ TVs have hdmi nowadays as well as $60 laptops like the maestro evolve.
How many countries have access to 70 MHz?
I'd have to take out a second mortgage on my house to buy this thing.
Overpriced. For that kind of money, I would buy a flex.
A very disturbing and disappointing new release from my favorite radio company. Man, where is TRUE innovation nowadays in Amateur Radio? Dave, W7DGJ
What would you like to see/suggest Dave?
@@HamRadioDX Hi, thanks for asking. I'd like to see true innovation. Something new, not something re-used. New tools developed using AI . . . Complete FT-8 abilities built into the unit, no computer required. An antenna tuner that is more than 3-to-1 . . . There are many things that could be new in a transceiver. They are just not being brave enough to invest in true radio R&D. Dave, W7DGJ
Does not come even close to my Yeasu FTDX101MP...
Buy a Yaesu...you'd be better served.
Hahahaha.
Bye bye IC.
I’am done with Icom…..
Nope. I see why you put the price at the end of the video, I would have clicked off at the MSRP announcement. I don’t care if it cooks my dinner and folds my laundry. I’m not paying $6,100 for a radio that won’t even do all bands and modes.
Fair enough