The Architecture of Biological Complexity - Sydney Brenner

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 12

  • @nbme-answers
    @nbme-answers 2 роки тому

    9:59 1952 Reaction diffusion to morphogenesis
    21:31 And so the most important General principle of biology, which makes a different from all other things in than all other natural systems, is that it is the only system in nature, which contains an internal description of itself

  • @kukan95
    @kukan95 6 років тому +2

    Focus and watch. That's important.

  • @asifimgoingtotryando
    @asifimgoingtotryando 11 років тому +1

    Self Similar Systems... Stellar.

  • @kramex81
    @kramex81 2 роки тому

    Mathematik ist die Kunst des Vollkommenen. Physik ist die Kunst des Optimalen.
    Biologie ist, infolge der Evolution, die Kunst des Zufriedenstellenden.
    Zitat
    Sydney Brenner

  • @HumbleMale
    @HumbleMale 5 років тому +4

    (13 January 1927 - 5 April 2019) I hope Mr. Brenner was ready to meet his maker.

    • @patldennis
      @patldennis 3 роки тому

      He didn't do anything after he died.

    • @rishikeshrishikesh1928
      @rishikeshrishikesh1928 2 роки тому

      His makers have long died. all makers are mortals

    • @farvision
      @farvision Рік тому

      HumbleMale: What an obnoxious statement, you are certainly not "humble". There's no evidence for any "maker". Wake up, learn more science.

  • @bris1tol
    @bris1tol 10 років тому

    Complexity is an unecessary artifact of bottom-uip thinking which is not present in top-down platonic thinking.
    Here is how that works:
    The quantum Leibniz. Permissible motion of a Leibniz particle and its non-interaction with personal consciousness.
    Here we examine the permissible motions of a Leibniz particle and interactions with consciousness,
    there being none.Consciousness is not created by wave collapse, but by its tcreation in two stage perception as
    follows:
    A Leibniz wave particle is defined by two principles.
    Using the Leibniz monad as a model, I must add that nowhere in this a
    nalysis have I had to refer to gaining or losing information, but rather that a beam of
    light acts, as a monad, with only one identity or soul. It is either entirely a wave or a particle.
    Similarly there seems to be is no effect on the results whether we keep our eyes open
    or closed. This means that slits and detectors alter the signals moreorless mechanically,
    with nothing to do with us and our consciousness.
    So it seems that all we need to know is what happens moreorless mechanically to the monad,
    so that collapse of the wave function has nothing to do with consciousness, it only
    signals the emergence of quantum wave into spacetime.
    a) The phase diagram. This is the q-test for position but not yet for time.
    The "particle" acts like a quantum wave if allowed to move in quantum space..
    But in this state the wave must follow its appropriate p,q phase curve, where q is position and p is
    momentum. But according to the Uncertainty Principle, we can't tell where it is on the curve
    beyond a certain fuzziness in the curve, the fuzziness being given by delta_q and delta_p,
    which are the uncertainties in each quantity. The limit of resolution of the wave is given by
    delta_p*delta_q >= h_bar/2 where h_bar is the Plank constant divided by 2*pi.
    b) The pre-established Harmony (PEH). The p-test. The PEH defines the momentum of a given particle.
    It might be thought of as holes in the phase diagram along the p,q curve which makes for ultimate
    harmony in the motion of the particle. I believe that uncertainties in p and q are not relevant here,
    that Mind knows the exact q,p paths that we can only measure within a certain resoljution given above..
    Falling into one of these holes, the particle pops into spacetime as a particle. We can see it moving.

  • @henryboldi
    @henryboldi 7 років тому

    Oh man, the audience questions at the end are seriously cringe worthy.