Both the Atomizer and the Quarker are excellent weapons. I use Mk3 Hazards on my Pathfinder and when charged up, they are lethal. Two problems with the Atomizer are 1) The gradual spread of shots and 2) the Atomizer has a wave type path with its shots if your robot moves as it shoots, similar to but not as pronounced as the flame throwers. I've noticed that the Quarkers on my Dagon can sometimes overwhelm the healing process in enemy robots because of the sheer number of shots its no reload system offers.
Atomizer has better up close damage due to constant fire since the reduced accuracy isn’t an issue, however I don’t think that very slight advantage is worth giving up the 100m extra range, equally perfect accuracy and higher burst fire that the hazard has
Interesting comparison, I didn't realize how strong the EMG family is. To be honest, I didn't think they were all that good, but I'm definitely reconsidering their value and impact now. Depending on their mothership charge rate, I think they could be a great off-meta budget choice for Raptor since you never have to worry about losing your DPS in a brawl.
If they give back the old firerate of EMGs than I think EMG is a bit more preferable. They lack 3 second reload and space between shots. And I died a lot during the reloads
I run the exact set up in the first game with the cryptic hazards but I've found every time I try using it with Pascal I run into a lot of Lynx's so I prefer to run Seeker, for the extra shield and bot durability as well as the anti stealth.
Gracias Aygir. 😸👍 Muy buena la comparación. Tengo un Typhon full Hazards con el piloto Otto, y un T-Fafnir full Atomizers con piloto Manni y dron parálisis para agregarle efecto y compensar el menor daño de las armas infinitas... ambas me encantan!!!✌ en efecto para combatir de cerca me gustan las Atomizers, a media o larga distancia las Hazard son mucho mejores.
Aygir.... is there a reason why you don't include the titan bar and the mothership percentage? you ask us our opinion, but those are two MAJOR deciding factors that we want to see in every video.
![[WR] 🔥 Athos VS Redeemer LYNX - Mk3 Comparison | War Robots](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wcH9wi7crYs/mqdefault.jpg)
![[WR] 🔥 Athos VS Redeemer LYNX – Mk3 Comparison | War Robots](/img/tr.png)
![[WR] 🔥 Puncher VS Subduer - Mk3 Comparison | War Robots](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Knl8QtmPdXM/mqdefault.jpg)
![[WR] 🔥 Venomous (Venom Toxin) VS Acoustic (Havoc Scatter) SCORPION - Mk3 Comparison | War Robots](/img/n.gif)
Hazard or Atomizer?
Atomizer
Atomizer
I prefer Atomizer
Atomizer
Hazzard
Hazard is just more practical, but atomizers are more fun😢
But in short hazard is burst semi-sniper weapons and atomizer is close range infinite ammo weapon
Both the Atomizer and the Quarker are excellent weapons. I use Mk3 Hazards on my Pathfinder and when charged up, they are lethal. Two problems with the Atomizer are 1) The gradual spread of shots and 2) the Atomizer has a wave type path with its shots if your robot moves as it shoots, similar to but not as pronounced as the flame throwers.
I've noticed that the Quarkers on my Dagon can sometimes overwhelm the healing process in enemy robots because of the sheer number of shots its no reload system offers.
Atomizer has better up close damage due to constant fire since the reduced accuracy isn’t an issue, however I don’t think that very slight advantage is worth giving up the 100m extra range, equally perfect accuracy and higher burst fire that the hazard has
typhon estelar wasp pilot midea nerium vs edie noll and mace?
ты лучший. требую больше видео с TYPHON
very good comparations + like
First btw 😢
Interesting comparison, I didn't realize how strong the EMG family is. To be honest, I didn't think they were all that good, but I'm definitely reconsidering their value and impact now. Depending on their mothership charge rate, I think they could be a great off-meta budget choice for Raptor since you never have to worry about losing your DPS in a brawl.
If they give back the old firerate of EMGs than I think EMG is a bit more preferable. They lack 3 second reload and space between shots. And I died a lot during the reloads
I run the exact set up in the first game with the cryptic hazards but I've found every time I try using it with Pascal I run into a lot of Lynx's so I prefer to run Seeker, for the extra shield and bot durability as well as the anti stealth.
Radiations weapons might receive a nerf because they perform too well for f2p weapons
Bruh
disagree
I think now that pathfinder exists, there's no point at running any medium weapons on any 4x medium weapons bot
how does the pathfinder have ANYTHING to do with "4 medium weapon bots" ?? ... i'm all ears..
love the music
Gracias Aygir. 😸👍 Muy buena la comparación. Tengo un Typhon full Hazards con el piloto Otto, y un T-Fafnir full Atomizers con piloto Manni y dron parálisis para agregarle efecto y compensar el menor daño de las armas infinitas... ambas me encantan!!!✌ en efecto para combatir de cerca me gustan las Atomizers, a media o larga distancia las Hazard son mucho mejores.
Aygir.... is there a reason why you don't include the titan bar and the mothership percentage? you ask us our opinion, but those are two MAJOR deciding factors that we want to see in every video.
I think the emg is better than the radiation weapons, but atomizer is barely better than quarker while hazard does 50% more damage than blight.
Hazard is best
Is it worth buying typhoon mk2 and 4x hazard mk2?
Ivory scourge vs Ivory atomizer on typhon pls
Muchas gracias por la información 😮
I have both. It depends on the maps.
Hazard vs Taran please 😢
Hi aygir 🎮🔝👋👋👋👋
❤❤❤
bro, what a great explanation, thanks, I was unsure which weapon to use but it seems like you read my mind 😊
Como se llaman las canciones que aparecen en los ganeplays?
We need to add damage to the Hazzards
Very nice action packed game
Hazard, Very Very nice
Hazards!
I don't know how you can still use that module with less than 2k powercells left
Buddy that's 2 million powercells, not 2k.