I don’t think that’s what them meant. They’re trying to say that the history of this food might slowly be lost or forgotten , not that it is hard to find this food.
Didn't taste good, I have no problem not eating it again. Why does everything from the past have to be sacred and "stored" away, so the many century's following can all come to the same conclusion. The biggest issue is, no one can find out the same thing and show it their people, because nothing gets forgotten and therefore nothing new is needed to cherish. Which in turn, repositions the goal post.
I have so many questions as this comment barely makes sense. I'm sorry you feel that way. I personally enjoy this dish, but if you don't, good for you. First of all, what is the conclusion that the centuries that follow come to? Is this you answering your own question? second of all, what does "no one can find out the same thing and show it their people" mean? Third of all, in regards to your "because nothing gets forgotten and therefore nothing new is needed to cherish" comment, old stuff doesn't halt progress. It serves as a place to build off of, a foundation. Yes, people romanticize antiquity, but that's the whole point of progress. Think of the blues: that's how jazz was made! People still love the blues, but that didn't stop jazz. and from jazz, rock and roll, r&b, countless others and more to come. Lastly, I fail to think of a single way conservatism moves the goalpost. Isn't that the whole point of conservatism? Not moving the goalpost?
so...they want everyone to know... but not consume? i think he doesn't understand business, it's significance to your culture is entirely irrelevant to the majority of the world, if you don't make and sell it's forgotten, if you make and sell its history gets diluted, choose one and deal with it, if its tasty people will eat and enjoy it and occasionally some will learn, but if you don't do that much nobody will even hear of it to consider learning..... also fun fact: usually people eating...just want to eat,if you wanna be a pretentious twat waffle about culture,go get a Michelin star,it's basically a free right to throw in story time with food,then you can blather on about a sticky gooey thing all you want as people chew it and look at you.
Nope, I could find it locally everywhere in Jakarta... Please do more research at broader area... Singapore is not the entire world...
Same in Malaysia...funny they said the culture was spread from Malaysia throughout SE Asia but didn't bother to do the research here
I don’t think that’s what them meant. They’re trying to say that the history of this food might slowly be lost or forgotten , not that it is hard to find this food.
Your heritage lives through us. Good job Insiders.
Looks delicious 😋
That looks tasty as hell ngl
Interesting! Never seen it before!🙌🏼
Sedappppppp kueh nih
Nunya ??
Literally sugar with sugar 😂
Isnt it glutinous rice cake?
My mom loves making these... she's from Jakarta...
Kuih is big thing among Malay in Malaysia😋😋😋
But i dont find nany accurate historical evidence for kuih originated from china itself
Ye la tu.. macamlah bangsa dia je terpaling pandai terpaling cipta makanan kat Asia ni.terpaling claim pun ye jugak.
Looks almost like a mochi
😊😊😊
Like sapin-sapin in the Philippines
Didn't taste good, I have no problem not eating it again.
Why does everything from the past have to be sacred and "stored" away, so the many century's following can all come to the same conclusion.
The biggest issue is, no one can find out the same thing and show it their people, because nothing gets forgotten and therefore nothing new is needed to cherish.
Which in turn, repositions the goal post.
I have so many questions as this comment barely makes sense.
I'm sorry you feel that way. I personally enjoy this dish, but if you don't, good for you.
First of all, what is the conclusion that the centuries that follow come to? Is this you answering your own question?
second of all, what does "no one can find out the same thing and show it their people" mean?
Third of all, in regards to your "because nothing gets forgotten and therefore nothing new is needed to cherish" comment, old stuff doesn't halt progress. It serves as a place to build off of, a foundation. Yes, people romanticize antiquity, but that's the whole point of progress. Think of the blues: that's how jazz was made! People still love the blues, but that didn't stop jazz. and from jazz, rock and roll, r&b, countless others and more to come.
Lastly, I fail to think of a single way conservatism moves the goalpost. Isn't that the whole point of conservatism? Not moving the goalpost?
Imma be a trader
so...they want everyone to know... but not consume?
i think he doesn't understand business, it's significance to your culture is entirely irrelevant to the majority of the world, if you don't make and sell it's forgotten, if you make and sell its history gets diluted, choose one and deal with it, if its tasty people will eat and enjoy it and occasionally some will learn, but if you don't do that much nobody will even hear of it to consider learning..... also fun fact: usually people eating...just want to eat,if you wanna be a pretentious twat waffle about culture,go get a Michelin star,it's basically a free right to throw in story time with food,then you can blather on about a sticky gooey thing all you want as people chew it and look at you.
Hmong people make that all the time
According to chinna Everything was there's first💀 so now even if it's true I don't think I'll belive anything they say.
I'm not a bot.
Someone give that worker a fresh pair of nitriles😂