Amiga Samplers (technical) - FutureSound / Master Sound / Stereo Master
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
- A technical look at 2 cheap Amiga 8-bit samplers from MicroDeal - in comparison to an earlier FutureSound model. What was the included software like? Was it usable?! Plus technical issues and sound comparisons. This is part 1 of 3. (Later parts will look at the high quality offerings!)
loving this series mate. subbed
I hope you resume this series of videos! They are fantastic!
I'm still waiting for part 2b lol
Me too!!!
where the HELL is part 2b 😡😡 I wanna hear all about how my TurboSound is superior to everything else in every way
UA-cam's recommended videos feature has been spot on lately - was shown your other video about the Amiga samplers and trackers and loved it (instant sub of course) - not only that but damn your really can seemingly effortlessly knock out a banger regardless of the age of the tech
Awesome subject, great channel tbh - thanks for your time in making these.
Daniel Jones I just finished watching part 1. You said exactly what I wanted to say. 👍
Same for me.
As primitive as amiga sampling may be, its still light years ahead of what pc's could do in the 80s.
PCs were boring office machines in the 80s, who was gaming on them back then ?
LOL. False.
@@vapourmile ?
@@wishusknight3009
You're imagining things.
Ever head of "information availability fallacy"?
It's basically the argument from ignorance: You aren't aware of something therefore it doesn't exist.
For the sake of example:
The CompuSonics DSP-1000 was a professional studio grade PC compatible 16bit digital signal processor and sampler which allowed PC-Based processing and mastering of CD quality audio. It was literally used to improve the quality of CDs.
It was also available to the professional market in 1984. It predated ALL the Amigas.
You should really try looking harder, you obviously won't find something if you aren't looking for it.
@@vapourmile sorry mate, ha was talking about the PC that regular people were using at the time...
by the way
" the CompuSonics DSP-1000 was a VCR-sized desktop unit with stereo I/O, 16-bit converters and a claimed 20 to 20k Hz bandwidth. The format never took off, yet the unit laid the groundwork for other CompuSonics products in the fledgling DAW market - certainly well in its infancy in 1984."
This series will be the reference for explaining early 90s sampled computer sound technology.
Thanks Telecrate. Behind the entertainment value, there's a certain amount of documentation for histories sake going on too. :-)
I wonder how long before you get a copyright strike on your own house tracks because someone thinks they sound similar.
Keep up the great work. Loving your work on the Amiga.
Yeah - I uploaded it in advance and left it for a few days to let the gods check it. I released my old Amiga stuff creative commons but via an aggrigator and it copyright claims everything. I hate it and can't undo it. People wonder why I haven't released music in 6 years and that's why! I keep it to live shows these day :-) Buuuuutt... that might change
@@CTRIX64 Please make that change!
@@CTRIX64 I hear you...I've made a few tunes featuring samples from other people's work, but have not released them for that very reason! I tend to stick to non-descript, single samples for most of my work now
You really should continue this amazing series!
15:55 Wow, that demo bundled with the software is quite something. It's like a kid randomly hammering on a synthesizer. Or a CD player desperately trying to play a VERY scratched disc.
Sheevlord “Alright lads, we need to create a demo track to go with the software. Only catch is it needs to include a Run-D.M.C. sample and some seagulls.”
AH YEAH! lol
comes to show that the guys that put all the product together.. didn't really know that much about what they were doing.. at least from a musician point of view
Certainly sounds like a demo by coders doesn't it! Although to anyone who was non-musical, it would have still been an impressive demo of what it was capable of I guess!
I've had music teachers who would find all sorts of symbolism and deepness in that track, hahaha
tbh if youre a modern dance music producer these videos are super enlightening on why it doesnt matter if you sample sounds and make your own tracks, the foundation of dance music is people playing samples as their instrument
man i was blown away by the videos already and then i realized i know your music from 8bc!! keep on with the series, its never too far into the rabit hole when you know your stuff right
The Amiga being able to effectively continuously vary the playback sample rate IN HARDWARE was great.
@@rorz999 LOL. The Amiga's sound chip is explained by the fact an 8bit DAC is one of the cheapest simplest possible circuits to build.
my.eng.utah.edu/~bowen/DAC_Proj/8-bit_r2rdac_current_sources.html
When the Amiga was released FM synthesis was still preferred in professional musical instruments because synthesizers are far more controllable.
What was more ubiquitous in the 1980s, the Amiga or the FM Yamaha DX-7?
ua-cam.com/video/WiYa4oUxKR8/v-deo.html
Amigas are not famous for being preferred in pro studios. They were the digital equivalent of the already outdated 1963 Mellotron. Except the Mellotron from 23 years before could easily voice more than 4 notes at a time.
ua-cam.com/video/N07-YAKtRAw/v-deo.html
@@vapourmile I see your point from a studio perspective.... but the Amiga was never a studio device nor marketed to that use-case ever. There was a huge divide between a computer and a studio in the 1980s. The most a studio computer did was control automation or play out simple MIDI data (by 1985) for which the Atari was marketed. Studio's contained $$$,$$$ of gear ... and even a basic sampler cost $$$$. The Amiga was $$$ (note the missing dollar digit!) and was a full computer with the bonus of 4 channel hardware sampler / re-player which could do some amazing things if you were careful and efficient with the sample source. Any studio owner would instantly hear it as 8bit and aliased.
A note on the R2R DAC - which are indeed simple to build - was not what was in the Amiga. The Amiga did a bunch more than just contain a single DAC. Unlike the sample playback cards for other platforms which were essentially a R2R DAC (like the HippoSound for Atari or SoundBlaster on the PC). The Amiga effectively had 4 x 8 bit DACs + 64 volume levels per channel, and as @blargg mentions above - it did varied resampling in hardware meaning that the CPU usage was 0% on audio playback unless you were doing modulation. A single command could trigger a sound effect and it'd just play until you stopped it in code. Even the Sound Blaster on the PC right up until the modern day uses the CPU for audio playback. That's why many Amiga people bought Gravis Ultrasounds if they bought a PC. I remember my dads 486SX/25 couldn't even playback a MOD without sounding fuzzy (as the SoundBlaster was 8 bit rather than 4 x 8bit). Consider the Amiga had an 8mhz CPU back in the old days... to output to a simple R2R DAC would have been impossible if you wanted to do anything (like gameplay) at the same time.
Studio samplers had dedicated processors worth many more times the price of an Amiga and built for the task. To answer your question on the DX - yes it would have been more common to find a DX7 in a studio. But I'd argue in the 1980's the Fairlight / E-mu Emulator and a ton of other digital samplers (often triggering drums and other effects) were just as common as the DX7. The Amiga is essentially a poor-persons Fairlight / Emulator. I do love the DX7 though. Mines currently broken but I'll possibly film a repair video - mostly because when a DX7 goes wrong it makes some of the wildest sounds you will ever hear!
@@CTRIX64That was unfortunately not very informative. Like so many others you seem to have assumed I don't know what I'm talking about. No, I'm a computing professional, and a programmer of the era when the Amiga was popular. So I can and have written programs for the Commodore Amiga, PC and Commodore 64 in the Amiga's day in Assembler. Including sample players, copper lists, etc.
A professional sampler only had one job: To make a single 16bit 44Khz digital recording of a sound. After that it was then processed by hardware which could play polyphonic sound, if needs be. Although in a professional setting, even to this day, samples are usually merely filtered then used as they are. Basslines, drum rhythms, etc.
The Amiga isn't really like a Fairlight. The Fairlight was not as simple as you claim. It provided sound shaping through frequency analyses which are complex even by the standards of today. The Fairlight used synthesising technology based on an FFT algorithm, there is nothing equivalent on an Amiga.
Also, contrary to your claim, the sound chip on the Amiga didn't resample anything. Samples can be played back at different speeds and that is all, so it is rather as simple as I said. You simply set a volume control, point it at a region of memory, set the playback speed, then trigger playback.
There have been attempts to improve on this using real-time software algorithms but an unassisted 68000 doesn't do very well when it comes to shaping sounds coming at it at a maximum of 4x22Khz. The 68000 isn't going to have an easy time modifying samples at a rate of 2 8 bit samples per raster then passing them to chip RAM. It just doesn't have the power. You can get things like 8-voice players, but what's the point? Even a cheap PC consumer sound card like the AdLib has a synthesizer chip with 9 voices onboard hardware processing and 16-bit waveform output. The AdLib is not an exotic device, it's the lowest end ever of the PC audio market.
In short though, yes studio equipment was more expensive. Amiga fans ALWAYS shout "COST!", but it isn't a valid argument. YOU may have had a tight budget but not everybody shares your own budgetary constraints. Mercedes are more expensive than Volkswagen Polos, private planes are more expensive than cars. . It doesn't matter. You don't dictate terms on what other people can afford to own. You can't invalidate something based on an assertion YOU can't afford it. Who cares if it's beyond your price range? Of course studio equipment is more expensive, it's better. It's more capable more sophisticated equipment with far more stable and quiet signal generators.
When people love Amigas they cling to anything the Amiga has done and tout it as extraordinary, purely because it's an Amiga doing it.
What about more generally,?If you aren't emotionally tied to the Amiga? What do people remember in music? The Amiga? Or the Prophet 5, the Roland 303 and 808, the DX-7, the Fairlight, the Clavichord, Moog and Oberheim.
Even in its forte, which was computer games, people remember Sega and Nintendo, Mario and Sonic.
Amiga fans grossly overestimate the Amiga and grossly underestimate everything else. Always trying to claim that anything more expensive doesn't count. No, if you can afford it then its utility is NOT invalidated by its cost.
Why do DGX-2 workstations, TODAY cost £350,000? Why did the Summit supercomputer cost £325,000,000?
Devices are NOT invalidated by the fact you can't afford them, and the fact they are often often more expensive does NOT imply the purchasers of them would be better of with Amigas. Nobody did weather research on a Commodore Amiga.
The Amiga is a cheap consumer toy.
@@vapourmile "The Amiga is a cheap consumer toy."
So many words and your conclusion is to tell us what we already know? News flash: Everyone knows that the Amiga is a cheap consumer toy. This is what it was marketed as (at least the 500). But you compare apples to oranges. The Amiga was not studio equipment nor was it ever marketed as studio equipment. You compare things that wheren't build for private use to a home computer (emphasis lies on "home") that was build to do many things. That doesn't make any sense.
If you want to do a comparison that isn't "private planes vs cars" (what the heck?) you'd need to compare it to something that is in the same field, like PCs or Macs. But you completly miss the point with about every single one of your sentences. Except the one I quoted and which is common knowledge.
@@wohlhabendermanager
"If you want to do a comparison that isn't "private planes vs cars" (what the heck?) you'd need to compare it to something that is in the same field, like PCs or Macs"
LOL. No I don't.... the no true Scotsman fallacy in disguise, again.
Yeah.... "If you want to compare the Amiga to anything else the only things you're allowed to compare it to are things like the Amiga, you know, like the Amiga".
You can rule out ANYTHING ELSE as "not the same thing as an Amiga" comparison because obviously the only thing truly "the same thing" as a Commodore Amiga is the same Commodore Amiga. Your argument is "The only way to make a fair assessment it to preemptively discount from consideration that isn't a commodore Amiga".
No, sorry, that's bullshit.
I can venture exactly the same in return: If I want a Cray supercomputer then I don't have to compare it to anything except Cray supercomputers. Microcomputers need not apply.
There is literally nothing about an Amiga that means you MUST consider it and reject other things. Having considered it, if you want SOMETHING ELSE, example: Something more powerful than an Amiga, then it's very easily ruled out.
When I set up a CGI department in the late 1980s we have £21 million to spend. Know how many Amigas we used? None.
You probably can feasibly make an album entirely on Garage Band on an iPhone, but there's no fucking point and it's stupid to imply when making a choice you Must select from tools a bit like Garage Band, because it obviously isn't true and that fact explains why people don't: They can get something more suitable instead.
The idea the only things you can take into consideration when making a purchase are things matching the exact description of a Commodore Amiga is fucking stupid. What if you *don't* want an Amiga because it *Doesn't* fit your specification?
"The only things you're allowed to choose from are those things which fit the description of the Amiga" is clearly stupid and wrong.
When people go out to buy a Bugatti or Lamborghini they *can* weight it up against a Ford Fiesta if they want to but it's fucking stupid to suggest that, having done so, they are then forced to make a selection from something in the same price bracket as a Fiesta. They don't. That's my point. Nobody who wants to own a helicopter *must* choose a scooter instead.
"You're can make a free choice, only your choice has to fit the size and shape of scooter because that's what I had!". No, that has never been true.
Amazing and informative. Insane how far we've come.
I had one of these as a kid and I loved it. Used it a lot with Octamed which for me was the only music software I ever learned how to use properly. I love all detail you go into here. I had no idea what was inside was so simple.
I had 'Stereo Master' and i loved it.
I didn’t realize how easy and economical it was to make sample based music back then. I remember struggling with a Protools digi 001 that never worked out for me. Now I see why people stuck to Amiga, which I really wanted, and Atari.
cant wait for the second part!!
Such a fun trip down memory lane, I remember buying the Stereo Master sampler and recording my cheap electric guitar and making mods in OctaMed. Sampling was still pretty magic back then, and having friends talk in the microphone and playing back their voice sped up was a lot of fun. Hoping you'll get around to part 2 one day, these videos are wonderful documentation of a really interesting time in computer audio!
Mate, I'm loving this series! Can't wait for the DIY episode. In the time between your first return to the amiga 500, I've gotten myself a pretty decent setup, accelerator and all. Only thing missing (ea; still in transit from ebay) is an IDE harddisk.
Definitely going to build myself a sampler. I'm hoping it's gonna be a fairly high quality one, or atleast, if it's "feature complete", there's options to either strip it down to the core or completely pimp it out if you have deep pockets. Coming from fasttracker for msdos, I know I want to go all-in on tracking on the Amiga.
Cheers man, can't wait for more episodes!
Awesome! Let me know if you do make one. Yeah - Fasttracker was and is still amazing. The 4 channel life does make it extra special though :-) The limitations are wild. Also - you can do your sampling on a modern PC and it'll still sound like an Amiga once the samples are shipped over. I might do a video on how I pre-prep samples on the PC side.
@@CTRIX64 Sampling on PC(+Mac?) and shipping over would be interesting. I always end up resampling stuff through the amiga and back into ableton when I want that amiga-ey sound.
Definitely also gonna build a sampler based on the next video, too, as I had one of those cheap ones and it's recently died!
Loved this. Perfect amount of detail as I'm an avid synth and electronics enthusiast.
Love and respect! Remember those mod and sample days so vividly and passionately!
This video is A-MAZ-ZING!!! It’s just so fascinating to see and hear how all this stuff worked back in the day - I can’t believe how many everyday modern mixing tasks you simply don’t even need to think about?! I mean, not once did you give any thought to using an EQ, a compressor or anything like that haha!? Makes me feel like I’m wasting so much time by constantly wondering which expensive VST channel strip I’m going to use on a drum sample these days…?! Kinda blows my mind! Hope you’ve got more vids like this cos I love it!!
I always appreciate the level of effort you take with these videos - delivered with extreme care and diligence to the small details. Kudos, and greetings from Massachusetts!
Great execution. Top notch production and just my niche.
Amiga was the greatest line of home computers of all time.
For an old school amiga user who's thinking about trying out sampling on one this is totally on point! Looking forward to the rest, especially the DIY one even though I've got a Technosound Turbo. :)
I extremely love your idea of producing such videos. Simply amazing! Waiting for the next one
Man... We need this channel active!!
I had the Stereo Master. It did okay. I only ever used the supplied software for using the realtime effects. When sampling I'd use the Audiomaster III by Aegis and MED (Later Octomed).
So watching this really brought back some memories.
Great! The more technical, the better! I can't go back to the more entry-level, generalist videos now.
Hahahaha.... love it. I totally just visted your web page too. It's on point. That secret page on the SNES launch is magic! Next video is kinda looking semi technical too... but more a look at software.
Dude I watch all kinds of Amiga vids but this is the first time in six years I found yours. These are great! Start a retro Amiga music series!
40ms of resolution xD Hard to believe one could make anything useful with that.
Fantastic series you did here ! This is the beginnings of home computer music right there.
I remember seeing a presser about your concert using the Amiga. Amazing! I used to use a DSS8+ all the time. I believe I still have it!
15:49 was a real treat! Watched that part back a few times.
oi Ctrix, firstly mad video. second finally some respect for my first love the k1. k1ii from Hornsby cash converters cheers dad. met john chowning down the track and he wasn't aware of that lil fm guru but was nice to chat to him about fm being the first form of sound synthesis i learned in a weird way it all makes sense. wrote a bunch of stuff on the mt32 ages ago too im sitting here with my aptiva d-20 ms2000 and mt32 and would only be happier if i had a k1
I hope Part 2 will come soon, im really really interested what comes next. :)
This series is great fun to watch!
I used to have an A.M.A.S sampler for my Amiga back in the day and would use it to make samples for use in the tracker software.
When I was about 12 I bought a second hand A500 for peanuts from a family friend. It came with a Master Sound cart which I never even tried to figure out. All that hardware is long gone now of course... but seeing it in this video brought back the memory of it lying around!
In fact it kind of makes sense, as it came with two boxes of PD disks, so I guess the guy had bought the Master Sound based on the allure of making his own PD demos.
This is a brilliant series, i need to see more from this guy
10:25 'and you can start to hear the crunch come back in there' YES exactly what some sounds & genres need :)
Your videos are the best, Chris! Keep 'em coming!
been waiting for part 2 please! It's a trip down memory lane!!!
Brings back memories from my teenage period :-D.
I had the Techno Sound Turbo II, also "Stereo", it had the same noise issues, was always a bit frustrating...
another amazing video, well done mate. youtube recommended you to me for some reason, and i watched on a whim because i used to be pretty into this kind of technology. but although i no longer am very interested in it, you make it all so incredibly interesting and fun to watch!
Can't wait for the next episode... I had the DSS tracker back then (unofficial copy), and I'd rip off samples from games like Flasback (which songs I could read directly inside DSS!! Even the address of the composer was written inside as a comment). That's the way I did music back in 1994...
I was light years away from the knowledge and means of what you expose here... This is SO amazing, man!!!
Next episode right NOW!
Would love to see you get into the technicalities of some of the particular aliasing /crunch/compression character people associate with the Amiga sound, for example it’s really clear often in the high end on string or wind samples, which you hear in the Shadow of the Beast or Another World soundtracks.
Great idea! That's almost all aliasing - it's to do with the Square waveform. Maybe in the next episode I'll hook up a scope and we'll take a look :-)
Great idea! That's almost all aliasing - it's to do with the Square waveform. Maybe in the next episode I'll hook up a scope and we'll take a look :-)
Very Interesting.
Did you not do the next part ? Or has it been lost ?
Wow, this is top notch youtube content! Beside your musical and entertainment talent your knowledge is great and you know how to explain things in a way that is easy to understand (stereo sampling with a mono converter, aliasing etc) I'm waiting for the next part.
These videos are absolute gold, mate
Hey Mate.I gather you've been busy. Have the next Amiga next videos come out yet? Am looking forward to the Mid Range vid. Love the vids.
You're spoiling us with these.
I built a sampler back in the day, used it to create samples for various public domain demos, thanks for the memories :-)
12:53 I think this is a new genre.. wonkwave :O
Great video! Think I’ve seen it maybe 4 times by accident. Really looking forward to the next part!
Listening to the demo that came with the Master sound. I had the same thought... literally the same words just before said XD
Cool vid
Yay, thanks Mate!
Will finally see dss sampler in action. Here in Warsaw you could get only 1-chip stereo samplers like digiton+audiomaster iv (pirate copy).
Aaaamiiiigaaaaahh
"Grande Pricks" = exceedingly good band name. I like.
Recently got an Akai S3000XL for £95. Bit dated today but makes me realise how lucky we are to get this hardware at an even cheaper cost😂 Loving this series hoping to see an update soon. Subscribed
Stereo master seems worth if not just for the ART of that waveform, also probably fun to run a drum machine or something through that live fx
Slight correction. Signed byte goes from -128 to 127. Not -127 to 127.
trapexit unless you design to have a signed 0
@@flavienvolken3733 True. Could be 1's complement. Though that's not very common.
@@spawnlink Thanks for that info! While I was editing this my brain went "hang on, 127+127 is 254 bits in total... the zero is another... where's the missing bit?!" I meant to look it up but just kept editing. For all the years looking at datasheets I've never taken note which way the extra bit swings; and I'll now forever know it's on the negative side. Much appreciated correction! It's wild to think I've coded an 8bit wave editing tool and never looked this up (although my center line at 128 would have still been ok; and my clipping logic was just clamped at 0 and 255)
I won't sleep until I see part 2. Please have mercy on me and release it fairly quickly :)
You should get some sleeping table s.
31 years later and I'm learning how to use the sampler I bought back in the day!
this was awesome.. and very interesting to see that every sampling-circuit added a different character to a sampled sound!
i hope you do the other parts too, soonish.. i would like to make my own HQ DIY amiga sampler :D
I wished these youtube videos existed back in 1995!
Wow, getting flash backs to my GCSE music in 1991, Amiga 500, Mastersound, MIDI, and Music-X & Octomed, good times. Went on to be a automotive NVH / acoustics engineer, great toys to learn aliasing / shannons theorem on.
Best description of aliasing ever!
Superb. Never used a sampler but love early rave tunes that were often made on such equipment,. Did my degree in electronic engineering so really interesting. Subscribed....
Nice video. Samples were used with trackers. I remember sampling and than using them in protracker and later with octamer together with a midi in/out
Where the part 2b video ?... We all need it ^^
Absolutely love your videos about the samplers. I used to have all of those cheap samplers and DSS as well.
Good old days ! :)
PS: Also love your "funked up" mod. Do you have website where i could download it ?
Your series seems to have ended suddenly. What happened?
Are the remaining parts going to happen? It might be worth checking out the Open Amiga Sampler that @echolevel @mnstrmnch and myself @abrugsch (all twitter/Instagram/github handles) are working on. It's a DIY design in the vein of these cheap samplers that we're making into super small card that won't cost the ludicrous amounts that original hardware now fetches
the programmed beat was amazing!
Will you ever get to part 2b & the bonus? Would love to hear your thoughts on the open source sampler that's out there
These videos are so awesome! Keep it up.
Me too... I'm also still using Cool Edit Pro in 2020 !
You can use it up to Audition 1.5 ... and beyond that Adobe had it passed to them and kept "the bits they understood" when the original CEP guys departed. It was a sad day for Cool Edit Pro but Syntrillium were smart because Multi-threading was around the corner and the whole codebase was about to require a complete over-haul to run across processors. Adobe dropped 16 mil on it... so hopefully Rob and David are out there with big smiles on their faces enjoying the high life.
@@CTRIX64 Thanks for your reply. Interesting bit of info !
Back in the day, with my pentium II 266 Mhz, Cool Edit was a real power hungry beast ! Each time I needed to apply some FX or Hiss Removal or so, I had plenty of time to wait... Nowadays, even without the use of multithreading, my computer is so much more powerfull, that in comparison, the waiting times seems really short... I don't even have time to read a book beside the computer as I used to ;-)
The year is 2047. cTrix is still hopelessly lost in the rabbit hole cranking out Episode 879
Haven't even cranked out EP3 yet! lol.
@@CTRIX64 Any ETA on that EP3????
@@daishi5571 I reakon early 2021! I had a special sampler I was going to borrow from someone for it, but then lockdown happened and I couldn't get it. And then my line of work (in events) got obliterated due to C19 - so I've had to reinvent my career which has taken most of my energy. Then my roof leaked in a storm, the ceiling partially fell in and I had to move out and rebuild / move to a new studio (with less help due to lockdowns) which has taken last 6 months. However, as of this week I've unpacked the box of samplers / Amiga and have a new way-better filming space I can use. I might be able to sneak in filming an episode before Christmas, else, early 2021. Working on it!
@@CTRIX64 Well I'll be looking forward to it. That is a particularly impressive list of bad luck to happen, and I hope that it does not continue. I bought a Microdeal Megalosound Sampler it's not the one I wanted, but the DSS8+ either rarely comes up for sale or is far too expensive.
@@CTRIX64 sending all the good vibes your way!
New sub due to this vid 👍 Looking forward to the dss8 breakdown. I recently got a Dss 8+, not used it yet, but want to know more about the quality it produces. Really love this sampling hobby, and amiga is where it started for me. Since then i have had an Akai s950, s2800, s1000, s1100, s3000, s3200, etc etc. Great vid. Thanks.
just discovered your channel. beautifully made videos. 👍👍 Made maybe over 100 modd on my a500 back in the day with soundtracker and octalyzer. i had a cheap sampler with which i sapled my instrıments. even used it as a midi sequencer with my 2 synths. i always wished to able to use midi and mods/tracked amiga samples together but never was able to do it though.
I had the Technosound Turbo II sampler back then and had great fun with it.
Another Absolutely fantastic video - so informative and beautifully put together - subbing for sure
Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy....?
Why was there no UA-cam back in the old A500 days?
I was able to muck about with samples I got from other Amiga fans.
Anyway, thx for bringing back old memories!
Love this vid! We've come a long way.
I loved my Stereo Master, great vid :)
Amiga was ahead of its time.
crazy stuff, keep em coming!
loved this, where is part 3?
wheres part 2b?
Que bien que exista gente como vos.....
Dont joke mine master work. The Run DMC track is there to juice the sound up, and you can use the samples, that is the reason i have made this master work
This video is just GREAT !
Many thanks for very interesting material and we need mooooooreeeeee ! :)
Ha ha that demo tune on the mastersound made me laugh. Excellent videos man - nice!
Loved your videos. I remember enjoying them as they were released and still enjoying them now. Any chance for a follow up part 3? :)
I'll Be honest i feel like making a modern day clone of the Future Sound Sampler would be cool with some little tweak's. For example I am curious to know what adding something like a cinemeg transformer into the circuit, I'm no electronic engineer but just curious i feel like you could add some extra warmth on the way in. But Yeah Think that would be cool, Also i just absolutely love the look of the Amiga and Atari Computer's the whole Keyboard and Machine in one just looks so cool. Would love to have one custom made for modern day production.
This is so good! Looking forward to more videos like this from you. Instant sub of course. Cheers from Toronto, Canada.
I had/have (somewhere) the Mono MasterSound.
Didn't use their software though.
IIRC MED Tracker added a record mode, one of the trackers anyway.
Also we managed to wangle MIDI triggering.
Hazy memories. 28 years ago now.
FrankenSeqwensing - CX-5M, Amiga, various synths - later Atari 1040STE
Then the maniac upstairs got an Akai sampler .... take off !!!
again awesome video, can't wait for the next part
Think I need to play these Amiga sampler vids to people to explain how I myself function!I had a 'beat studio' sampler - looks like A turbosound - my preferred sample rate was 22-23k Quality/size sweet spot! ,👍
Part 2 will come if we just all believe in it
Keep this going Mate !
I recall having a Golem sampler and using Audiomaster for software.