The Roundtable Insight - Michael Every, Art Berman and Yra Harris

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 37

  • @davidrichards1741
    @davidrichards1741 18 днів тому +2

    So many fantastic interview/videos on this great channel with Yra and everyone... WOW

    • @yraharris1117
      @yraharris1117 17 днів тому +1

      miss the wisdom of David Richards

  • @alexlove6606
    @alexlove6606 14 днів тому

    Very thought-provoking from 3 very considered people. Thanks for sharing your valuable insights.

  • @edgeman148
    @edgeman148 11 днів тому

    This was wonderful, thank you all very much.

  • @crouchhill
    @crouchhill 19 днів тому +1

    I really enjoyed this podcast from all involved, particularly from Art.
    Thank you 😊

  • @sheevamatimbas4300
    @sheevamatimbas4300 19 днів тому +1

    Loved this podcast, damn Yra was on fire today

  • @antonyjh1234
    @antonyjh1234 11 днів тому +1

    Russia never retook Crimea, USA tried to force them out but they never left, they have had a base there since before USA was a country.

  • @scottharding4336
    @scottharding4336 17 днів тому +2

    Mr. Every's answer about what GDP is for shows the essential psychopathy of our economic and political systems. Only Art Berman thinks systemically.

  • @charlescartwright3145
    @charlescartwright3145 21 день тому

    I truly appreciated this build what a great commentary 💰💼🏦

  • @skeptickpc
    @skeptickpc 18 днів тому

    Can you provide the proper link to the Art Berman paper? thank you

  • @sirluciussquigglesworthlll6503
    @sirluciussquigglesworthlll6503 18 днів тому

    🔥

  • @Ritastresswood
    @Ritastresswood 16 днів тому

    Read Jean Baptiste Fressoz please, we need everything that we can lay our hands on to survive.

  • @gizzydillespie9695
    @gizzydillespie9695 20 днів тому +2

    too much neocon

    • @yraharris1117
      @yraharris1117 20 днів тому +3

      really --nice label but being an opponent to Neocon thinking ---don't see it but maybe you can enlighten us

    • @gizzydillespie9695
      @gizzydillespie9695 19 днів тому

      @@yraharris1117 I was referring to Michael Every. Seemed like he dominated the conversation before I turned it off.

    • @yraharris1117
      @yraharris1117 19 днів тому +1

      @@gizzydillespie9695 either way---I would never label Michael a neocon for they are too narrow ,in my opinion,in their analysis ,especially as they pay little emphasis to economics to which Michael pays a great amount of attention.Rabo Bank is an old established Dutch bank in the fine example of Dutch much more concerned with the financial aspects of the world and military efforts were far too expensive.A good read would be to pick up on Arrighi and Braudel to see how Dutch imperialism played out---out Immanuel Wallerstein---but Gizzy your comments and answer initiate far great analysis and discussion which is what we all ought to pursue---thanks

    • @gizzydillespie9695
      @gizzydillespie9695 10 днів тому

      @@yraharris1117 Thanks. I could pick a different descriptor other than neocon, but you wouldn't like any of the others.

  • @mrNashmann
    @mrNashmann 20 днів тому +1

    yra i love the way you think man i wish we had leaders in canada like you all we have is nepo baby trudeau bootlicker singh and pp a man that has never had a job what a joke

  • @atgratgr4162
    @atgratgr4162 20 днів тому +1

    "Im a global macro guy"........Ira, its ok to be just a trader bro......but I'll use the global macro title next cocktail or dinner party.too....i just cant add the sophisticated eyewear.... a bridge too far for me....lol

  • @OldJackWolf
    @OldJackWolf 20 днів тому +1

    I suspect many of their narratives will change as climate impacts accelerate.

    • @gyzarcg88
      @gyzarcg88 19 днів тому +1

      I will respectfully disagree, and I don’t think climate impacts are going to be very impactful during the lives of these older guys

    • @OldJackWolf
      @OldJackWolf 19 днів тому

      @@gyzarcg88 Sorry, I've been deploying to these disasters since Hurricane Michael. My environmental consulting business and I were cruising to retirement, so I decided to run to the light and help the victims. There is less time than you think. Much less. So I disagree with your assessment. But it will be interesting to watch what those in denial as things play out. We're in abrupt climate change now. For reference on that type of change, there is a government report available on line.

    • @gyzarcg88
      @gyzarcg88 19 днів тому +2

      @@OldJackWolf Thank you for your response, & more importantly thank you for your assistance to those that need the help! I predict an increase in severe weather occurrences, but these impacts will be regional and distributed unevenly. If you have a title of the report or link, please feel free to share!

  • @dennis6693
    @dennis6693 21 день тому

    Renewables can and will sustain baseloads. You're wrong.
    No disrespect, its just not your area of expertise.
    The next few decades will be an All of the Above near-term energy future. But the electrification and digitization of Everything coupled with rapidly advancing technological innovation will ensure that the lowest cost and most abundant fuel resource will be used to generate electricity and power the world (solar). Gas could sustain the accelerating load growth for the remainder of the century, but it won't because it cannot outcompete solar economically.
    Oil will cease to be burned altogether but will still be used, recycled, and reused as a primary material resource. Some gas will be burned but not for baseload.
    That said, the next decade will be a transition to a digital financial system fueled mostly by oil and gas, and nuch like you suppose. But by then, the continuing exponential growth of solar will be undeniable, even by old men like us. If you don't believe me, ask your grandchildren.

    • @Zanderzan1983
      @Zanderzan1983 20 днів тому +7

      I'm a renewables engineer. Renewables need baseload where there isn't natural hydro resources, which is most places.

    • @chrish9311
      @chrish9311 20 днів тому

      Wrong. Solar doesn't work in most of the western world where industries are. Also it's a waste of land. Nuclear energy is the best most reliable solution for now.

    • @Jeremy-WC
      @Jeremy-WC 20 днів тому +3

      go look at energy world use by year, We burn 2x the wood we did when it was our only energy source and 7x the coal when it was the primary. At best a new source of energy has made consumption flat of said resource. In 2035 if we have the oil we will still be consuming over a 100 million barrels a day even if solar is 1000x or even 10000x greater then today.

    • @22terrytibbs
      @22terrytibbs 20 днів тому +1

      Dennis is a Chinese misinformationist who wants to export unemployment through promoting high electricity prices.....

    • @dennis6693
      @dennis6693 20 днів тому +2

      @Jeremy-WC We are going to consume a lot more energy in the coming decades, and it's going to be consumed as electricity. Where do you think the energy is going to come from? Oil is not used/cost-effective to generate electricity. It is mostly used for transportation and heating, both of which will be more and more electrified. Electricity cars will dominate the market once the charging network gets built. It's a decades long process (two to three decades), not a 3-5 year time horizon. Cars will drive you faster, safer, and more cost-effectively.
      I heat my home with gas, cook with it, and am sitting in front of my wood stove. I live in the real world, and I understand how it is powered and controlled. All of the Above solutions will continue to grow until one outperforms the rest, and then one will dominate the others and provide the base loads. Give it time, and we'll what emerges.