developing countries are going to use huawei 5G so they do not have limitation for network, however....you understand...who has the limitation for network in the future. :)
many people would use it *because* it has no C macro preprocessor :)However I agree a sanitised macro system (see Rust) is useful. But what if they allowed 'typeless functions' to behave like macros?(like a simplified generic) it wouldn't breach their simplicity much
Slides for this talk: talks.golang.org/2016/applicative.slide#1
Thanks Sameer for all your contributions
Thank you very much for sharing
By far the best intro to go I've seen. Pure gold! 🙌🏻
Go routines in combination with closures and channels == total awesomeness
I started not liking Go the first time I saw it. But I must say that for writing servers it is amazing and almost unbeatable.
That was an amazing demo. I loved learning facts about visibility/type declarations/what's enforced by the compiler, as I was learning!
Minor correction. Java Generics were introduced in Java 5, not Java 4. Great introduction to Go, specially for someone with a background in Java.
Absolutely great presentation.
Amazing the tricks to improve performance
Is it 21st century Erlang?
Well introduction of Go
Great demo!
9:45 where does Rust fit into this paradigm? :)
It belongs close to C and C++... just above C++.
Really great demo!
I always thought, this should be Japanese (pronounced "sekai"), also meaning "world"...
Sameer looks a bit like a real life version of Eli Vance from Half Life :D
What is the guarantee that my private data in my Go app is not there by Google??
Go is an open source language. That's your guarantee
What's the guarantee that your private data in a Java Application is not being exposed to Oracle?
Scala = Java++
Hahahaha
NEVER
developing countries are going to use huawei 5G so they do not have limitation for network, however....you understand...who has the limitation for network in the future. :)
Excelente
I found it impossible to use because it has no C macro preprocessor.
Please add it and i start using it ..... :-)
many people would use it *because* it has no C macro preprocessor :)However I agree a sanitised macro system (see Rust) is useful. But what if they allowed 'typeless functions' to behave like macros?(like a simplified generic) it wouldn't breach their simplicity much
GCC has a "preprocess only" option. Shove your Go code through GCC first if you really want C macros. One extra line in your makefile!
do not do what the title says
every third sentence he says 'aahhhhh...mmmm..'