(Big Win) High Capacity Magazines Are NOW LEGAL In California?!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,8 тис.

  • @USCCAOfficial
    @USCCAOfficial  Місяць тому +3

    UPDATE: An en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted California’s request for a stay of a district court decision striking down the state's large-capacity magazine ban on October 10th, 2023. It was sent to the US Supreme Court but they sent it back to the lower courts to hash out.

  • @The_Kirk_Lazarus
    @The_Kirk_Lazarus Рік тому +2832

    Should be called standard capacity magazines, not "high" capacity.

    • @socratesvela8285
      @socratesvela8285 Рік тому +140

      The tyrants are experts in linguistic gymnastics, so they like to redefine things.

    • @yunghysterik
      @yunghysterik Рік тому +29

      Bro I just want STANDARD G19 mags for CC instead of 10's..

    • @haywoodyoudome
      @haywoodyoudome Рік тому +1

      Exactly. We're not going to make any progress if we keep using the left's terminology.

    • @kdm28
      @kdm28 Рік тому +5

      ​@@yunghysterikindeed, this seems like a red herring to drain resources from other battles

    • @TheMrDarius
      @TheMrDarius Рік тому +3

      That’s amazing I love this

  • @andrewdanvers308
    @andrewdanvers308 Рік тому +2058

    I think people are probably more shocked that there are actually still real honest and honorable judges in California.

    • @JoeyBeez
      @JoeyBeez Рік тому

      Cuban ancestry so he is allergic to commies

    • @AMERICANsparky32
      @AMERICANsparky32 Рік тому +4

      Fr fr

    • @Purrrrfectshot
      @Purrrrfectshot Рік тому +17

      There isn't, they just act like they're on our side but u know they're not actually going to lift the bans

    • @kennethmeeker6369
      @kennethmeeker6369 Рік тому +4

      @@Purrrrfectshotthey’ll be sued but there use to that .

    • @hummerzdca
      @hummerzdca Рік тому +4

      You’re so right! Like when I carry 10+1, it’s a “you don’t take ten bullets to an eleven bullet gunfight!”… So FINALLY there’s hope!🇺🇸❤️🙏

  • @awatchmanoftrueisrael
    @awatchmanoftrueisrael Рік тому +1059

    It’s quite humbling and frightening to know that Criminals use 30 Round Magazines with Impunity while it takes Lawful Legal Citizens 3 Magazines to Equal ONE OF THE CRIMINALS!!!

    • @hoflungdung111
      @hoflungdung111 Рік тому +28

      I'm going to save everyone time. No they're not legal Bonta has submitted his appeal. The 9th circuit is likely going to give him a stay.

    • @ultimateone624
      @ultimateone624 Рік тому

      There ping pong masters

    • @zombygunslinger
      @zombygunslinger Рік тому +95

      I live in CA, I remember the last gun I bought came with a 10 round magazine, the same day there was a new story about a gang member who was killed in a car chase with the cops, he had several guns, including an AK47 with 30 round magazines. These laws only hurt law abiding people.

    • @clocksurfer
      @clocksurfer Рік тому +33

      Criminals also use 40, 60, & 100 round magazines in their "assault weapons", or slap 30 round mags into Glocks with switches, and post videos on social media of themselves firing their weapons in any indiscriminate direction.

    • @mjolnirswrath23
      @mjolnirswrath23 Рік тому +33

      Criminals also use full auto and don't care about background checks or laws...

  • @9erempire549
    @9erempire549 Рік тому +398

    Now we just need them to add stand your ground laws.

    • @dwennenful
      @dwennenful Рік тому +24

      We are a castle state actually 😅😅

    • @autisticdiablo1746
      @autisticdiablo1746 Рік тому +18

      I thought CA is a stand your ground state

    • @Johnskis10
      @Johnskis10 Рік тому +33

      Ca is a stand you ground state. I know this because I live in commifornia and needed to know my rights when buying my AR.

    • @deshonjohnson355
      @deshonjohnson355 Рік тому

      Ten toes Down

    • @YUMAMAGIC1963
      @YUMAMAGIC1963 Рік тому +14

      I don't understand why certain laws are not universally applied nation wide. As a CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES you are entitled to self defense and no state, county or city should be able to supercede that unless you violate certain laws and give up your rights.

  • @angeloduran7530
    @angeloduran7530 Рік тому +76

    I’ll believe it when I can have mags shipped to my house or get them at sportsman’s

    • @definitelynotthea.t.f.8813
      @definitelynotthea.t.f.8813 10 місяців тому +8

      I’m not suggesting you move out of California… but maybe you could just take a vacation out of state somewhere with Freedom. Personally I chose to leave. The CA DOJ ket dropping guns off the DOJ roster and before I could complain to my Congressman and my local reps I was in violation of an un-Constitutional law on Magazines. I will not move back until the rest of the State gets their shot together and starts fighting the tyrants in Sacramento. There are so many people that are just straight ignorant and most people don’t even know their rights.

    • @Mo-cn9kd
      @Mo-cn9kd 9 місяців тому +1

      @@definitelynotthea.t.f.8813 the issue is the ignorant people holding such strong stances on things they dont even understand. makes you question if we should all be able to vote

    • @Tiah-mm8lp
      @Tiah-mm8lp 4 місяці тому

      ​@@definitelynotthea.t.f.8813Run for Congress or become a judge. We need folks like you.

  • @unixsuperuser
    @unixsuperuser Рік тому +383

    They knew what was going to happen because they KNOW they are breaking the law. They know what they are doing is unconstitutional.

    • @frankrizzo3729
      @frankrizzo3729 Рік тому +17

      Rules and laws don't apply to corrupt politicians

    • @Chretze
      @Chretze Рік тому

      That's also why these liars call 10 round magazines "standard capacity" instead of "minimal / reduced capacity".
      So they can play their "Nooo you silly goyim, we only wanna ban high capacity mags, standard capacity is totally fine with us!" to trick people into supporting their unconstitutional filth. They know damn well 30 rounds is standard (or 20 at the very least if you go with the Vietnam era mags).

    • @Person0fColor
      @Person0fColor Рік тому

      @@frankrizzo3729or illegals immigrants

    • @Ween745
      @Ween745 Рік тому +12

      They don't care and they will continue to do whatever they want because there are no consequences.

    • @Brett235
      @Brett235 Рік тому

      ​@@frankrizzo3729because they're criminals.

  • @slayer1112man
    @slayer1112man Рік тому +541

    They can't let it go. There should be charges filed against these state and federal politicians that disobey federal laws

    • @BarnDoor-won5ve
      @BarnDoor-won5ve Рік тому

      Uh huh, and who's going to pursue those charges? The cops enforcing the tyranny? The d.a. allowing the lawlessness and collapse of order? The lawyers who's job is to win no matter what right or wrong has to say about it, or context, or common sense or decency? The judges that are upholding this evil in the first place? The politicians who are beholden to the power on this planet who operate on self interests and serve their masters like the pig-dogs they are?
      Bro, you can't fight the system using the system, it doesn't work that way. And don't even come back to me with "wE jUsT NeED tO vOtE tHosE dEmOcRaPs oUt aNd remINd tHem wHo tHeY wUrk FOr". The hegelian dialectic always was nothing but a distraction to give us the illusion of choice and power.
      No one is going to reverse the system for us, it's up to each individual to just stop playing along and walk away from the system to create and defend our own societies, small tribal-like communities based on free will participation and mutual cooperation of self sustainment

    • @bigmike8808
      @bigmike8808 Рік тому +27

      Absolutely!!!! They are in violation of their oath.

    • @i-seanneill7051
      @i-seanneill7051 Рік тому +9

      Yes start with New Jersey

    • @lunam7249
      @lunam7249 Рік тому

      treason!! a death penaly offence...violation and restriction of the 2nd amendment!!

    • @mikehorowitz7113
      @mikehorowitz7113 Рік тому +46

      Start with Gavin Newsom

  • @sackman1886
    @sackman1886 Рік тому +356

    Many other more free states in the union simply right-off California as a lost cause. Honestly, we Californians needs your guys' help. There are a TON of pro 2nd amendment law-abiding gun owners in the state (by sheer numbers, probably a lot more than most other states in the nation), and we are simply oppressed by an authoritarian regime in this state. Love Benitez! He's doing the Lord's work, along with a handful of Sheriffs in the state including my own county Sheriff Chad Bianco here in Riverside.

    • @JL-cn6nh
      @JL-cn6nh Рік тому +42

      Nah man , most of us has someone we care for living in Kali- we are not writing any red blooded American off , but we sure would like to see a lot more votes going the other way.
      Never give up! We won’t !!
      From the deep South. 👍💪

    • @Osprey1994
      @Osprey1994 Рік тому +12

      Some of us live in states that are as bad or worse.

    • @JimmieJoeSparky
      @JimmieJoeSparky Рік тому +38

      Checking in from behind enemy lines in Long Beach CA. There are a lot of us. No voter ID laws are killing us.

    • @cwr8618
      @cwr8618 Рік тому

      NY, HI, NJ, and quite a few other states have garbage government. It's not just CA, by far.

    • @bonafordcraccawallen9823
      @bonafordcraccawallen9823 Рік тому +1

      treason takes two to file charges.. get it done

  • @robertburr7407
    @robertburr7407 Рік тому +53

    Well it's definitely not a law yet. I have tried ordering standard capacity mags from 7 different dealers and none would ship to California. I miss freedom week.

    • @bigdfitness5020
      @bigdfitness5020 Рік тому +11

      Drive to Arizona or Nevada and get some magazines

    • @danielmanly4793
      @danielmanly4793 Рік тому +8

      @@bigdfitness5020 It is rather peculiar that states such as CA welcome out of state folks into their boarders for medical procedures which may be illegal in their home state, however, frown upon CA residents leaving the state to exercise other freedoms...

    • @santiagoelias9952
      @santiagoelias9952 Рік тому +2

      When is freedom week?

    • @HandyMan369
      @HandyMan369 Рік тому +4

      ​@@santiagoelias9952long gone brotha. But if you have high capacity mags laying around just say it's from freedom week.

    • @ramonm5923
      @ramonm5923 Рік тому +1

      @@HandyMan369I have some but confused as to if I can use them or not???

  • @johnsmith-vy3fp
    @johnsmith-vy3fp Рік тому +23

    How they can call over 10rds "high capacity" when a regular 9mm handgun has a factory standard magazine of around 15, is beyond me

    • @MrMagoo321
      @MrMagoo321 5 місяців тому

      21 too. The robbers act in groups with 30 rounders and a switch so the more the merrier

  • @adrianbourdaa
    @adrianbourdaa Рік тому +87

    My favorite part about attorney general Bonta’s arguments is when it comes to the pistol restriction in California they argue that a magazine disconnect feature is required for a pistol to be safe for sale. Which makes the magazine a required item for the firearm to function and not an accessory. But in his argument for magazines to not be a protected arm under the Second Amendment, he argues that magazines are not part of the firearm and thus not protected. He calls them accessories.
    You can’t make both arguments and be intellectually honest it’s just asinine.

    • @KonaLife
      @KonaLife Рік тому

      Bonta is just a tool being wielded by Gruesome Newsom and the Dem narrative that anything related to firearms is “sinister” and “evil”. Funny how they all say that when they’re protected by their own private security who are allowed to carry +10 round mags, and carry guns that us peasants can’t own.

    • @wealthintruth6227
      @wealthintruth6227 Рік тому

      That's the same commie that wants to envoke an exit tax .
      Leave Cali and still be enslaved for CA taxation

    • @smokepeddler
      @smokepeddler Рік тому

      It's actually the micro stamping that's required.

    • @smokepeddler
      @smokepeddler Рік тому +1

      @@Will-W ah. Thanx for the update

    • @bigmike8808
      @bigmike8808 Рік тому

      I love it when the ATF finally steps on their own d**k and backs themselves into a catch 22. Absolutely love it.

  • @codyjenn8785
    @codyjenn8785 Рік тому +20

    This is great news and you dang right banning high capacity magazines is unconstitutional and so is banning AR-15s

  • @OOICU812
    @OOICU812 Рік тому +126

    I just wanted to correct you… “Standard capacity” magazines.

    • @PTRRanger951
      @PTRRanger951 Рік тому +3

      He referred to them as standard capacity when talking about the MI law. High capacity is what CA and states that’s refer to them as. So he is correct in calling them high capacity since it’s referencing the wording of those laws.

    • @trumpetpunk42
      @trumpetpunk42 Рік тому +1

      @@PTRRanger951 Great, Now I have to watch this to find out "about the MI law." Not that I'd comply anyway....

    • @PTRRanger951
      @PTRRanger951 Рік тому +3

      @@trumpetpunk42 it’s from the 1990s. He was talking about how they did the banning standard capacity magazines, and said meaning everything over 10 rounds. So he was calling the typical 20 and 30 rounds standard. He just talked about it briefly about 3-5 minutes in.
      He was just using high cap and that is what everyone in states that are banned calls them. So it’s easier to understand, especially since this ruling only applies to CA and no other state.

    • @SeraphsWitness
      @SeraphsWitness Рік тому +1

      They're just quoting the court case. That's the language of the trial.

    • @trumpetpunk42
      @trumpetpunk42 Рік тому

      @@PTRRanger951 Thank you sir, you're a gentleman and a scholar!

  • @robertweekes5783
    @robertweekes5783 Рік тому +4

    Concealed carry CCW permits are also available in Los Angeles, according to gun store guys I talked to. You get the pistol first, pay a registration fee, pass a firearms target shooting test and then get your permit for that firearm. No “need” needed

    • @retok710
      @retok710 Рік тому +1

      so I just show up and ill be able to get ccw license?

    • @zekem3252
      @zekem3252 Рік тому +2

      Don't you have to go through the interview and approval process?

    • @Aawd695
      @Aawd695 Рік тому

      Which gun store is saying that? You might be misleading people here. Unless something in writing had change I missed. When I got mine, I had to write a formal true justifications as to why and I had to go through the sheriff for approval.

    • @Mo-cn9kd
      @Mo-cn9kd 9 місяців тому

      @@Aawd695 california has been a shall issue state for a bit now. you can get a ccw anywhere

  • @Burnlit1337
    @Burnlit1337 Рік тому +63

    Thank you so much for the history of this case! I'm a new gun owner and I'm not privy to the odds and ends of these recent cases. I actually didn't know this was going on, so glad I held off buying more mags

    • @hybridcheef8071
      @hybridcheef8071 Рік тому +5

      What are you talking about You should be buying as many standard 30 round capacity magazines as you can.

    • @michaelfreeze1791
      @michaelfreeze1791 Рік тому

      Until SCOTUS rules or maybe the 9th will read the writing on the wall and do the right thing you still cant buy anything larger than a 10 round mag here in The Peoples Republic of Kalifornia🤬🤬🤬. What ever the 9th does they will draw this out as long as possible.@@hybridcheef8071

  • @bobkrohn8053
    @bobkrohn8053 Рік тому +159

    I’m told Rahm Emmanuel, as Mayor of Chicago, once said “if you need 30 rounds to hunt, you suck at hunting”.
    The obvious response is “If you need an unarmed populace to govern, you suck at governing”.

    • @stevenhall2408
      @stevenhall2408 Рік тому +12

      Of course, a statist like that doesn't recognize it's not about hunting.

    • @matterofrights2344
      @matterofrights2344 Рік тому +9

      In the USA, the people govern themselves. Our employees do not govern the people.

    • @smtbigelow
      @smtbigelow Рік тому

      If you need 24/7 armed security, youre a dictator.

    • @IMillionsKnives
      @IMillionsKnives Рік тому +2

      I wonder how many rounds are in the firearms that his bodyguards use…. Food for thought.

    • @dmsmsi1054
      @dmsmsi1054 7 місяців тому +1

      Animals don’t shoot back….unless it’s Hamas.

  • @Benjanuva
    @Benjanuva Рік тому +195

    Its really concerning to see California continue to fight this. Especially going so far as to preemptively appeal a decision that has yet been made because they know they won't like it.

    • @Person0fColor
      @Person0fColor Рік тому

      It’s what they did to force ghey married down the throats of the working class here in California.
      We literally voted on it it got down voted and they said “we’re gunna do it anyways”
      Because that’s how democracy works. If you don’t like the outcome just go to the courts til you get the desired outcome 😂

    • @cwr8618
      @cwr8618 Рік тому

      hey man, half the state is not on board with this bs and the rest of the bs from the left.

    • @flare9757
      @flare9757 Рік тому +13

      I like it because it will be appealed to the 9th Circuit. I live in Washington, so once it goes through the 9th Circuit, I can get full capacity mags.

    • @DudeSoWin
      @DudeSoWin Рік тому +1

      If you are pro 2A, then cut the rot off and stop supporting Californian degeneracy. The sooner civilians like you recognize California as a demilitarized coastal platform of the military (DMZ), the sooner the other citizens not only get their rights but without being extorted by legal bafoons reposturing and eroding daily life. Law for California never abided the consitution and to force it so is injustice and robbery leveraged against the nation.
      We should all be discussing Greater Idaho, that is the only solution for Californian legal bloat and inefficiency in taxes to have its risks mitigated and damages minimized.

    • @matthewstimmel7497
      @matthewstimmel7497 Рік тому

      ​@@flare9757same!

  • @scottbalbas7752
    @scottbalbas7752 Рік тому +24

    There should be no limit as each situation is so different! Tell these "lawmakers" that their security guards get 2 rounds!!

  • @robnox
    @robnox Рік тому +12

    Now we should push for prison time for these politicians writing these illegal unconstitutional laws.

  • @bobbymoss6160
    @bobbymoss6160 Рік тому +6

    Last time I heard this, I tried to order some standard capacity 9mm and AR mags, but the online retailer denied my order. I'm just gonna wait this time.

    • @calical514
      @calical514 Рік тому +1

      Can’t even order anything

    • @flexapex9801
      @flexapex9801 Рік тому

      Still can’t order 30 round mags ?

  • @TheHarleywolf
    @TheHarleywolf Рік тому +61

    Only problem is as soon as he said they could not ban them he stayed that decision to give California a chance to appeal.

    • @stopitdad69
      @stopitdad69 Рік тому +28

      He's dotting his i's and crossing his t's. The 9th sided with him last time BEFORE bruen, and when the En Banc overruled it, Supreme Court slapped them on the wrist. He's just making sure the state can't say he didn't give them a fair chance.

    • @Person0fColor
      @Person0fColor Рік тому

      @@stopitdad69a fair chance 😂
      IS laws are only meant to be followed by US citizens politicians and illegals can do what ever they want 😂😂😂

    • @UncleMilty
      @UncleMilty Рік тому +22

      He is a judge, has to be fair to each side. Even tho Newsom and sidekick don’t deserve it for all their lowdowndness.

    • @TheHarleywolf
      @TheHarleywolf Рік тому +6

      @@UncleMilty No. He could have made the ruling and let California appeal it.He did not have to put an immediate stay on it.

    • @XRakkgruntX
      @XRakkgruntX Рік тому +7

      Protocol, it’s not personal, it’s the process

  • @ConservativeCalifornian1032
    @ConservativeCalifornian1032 Рік тому +410

    As a Californian, I’m concerned this won’t last long. Hopefully my neighbors stop voting for these tyrants.

    • @tkeo12
      @tkeo12 Рік тому

      Your neighbors will keep voting for these tyrants . Same as mine. They learn nothing.

    • @SargentD4
      @SargentD4 Рік тому

      No one votes these people in. They (Nancy quote- “install” ) themselves in office.

    • @Fatal_Inertia
      @Fatal_Inertia Рік тому

      They wont, your best bet is to sell your now overpriced property and move to a constitutional state. Just dont bring any "California" with you ;)

    • @trententjankins8743
      @trententjankins8743 Рік тому

      yes hopefully we get rid of tyrants who get rid of our birth rights

    • @Morpheus187
      @Morpheus187 Рік тому +5

      Tyrants ? 😂😂😂😂

  • @davidmerrell1163
    @davidmerrell1163 Рік тому +74

    St. Benitez needs to be protected at all costs!

    • @bigmike8808
      @bigmike8808 Рік тому +1

      I was thinking the same thing. God bless and protect Roger Benitez.

    • @Falling_Down_D-FENS
      @Falling_Down_D-FENS Рік тому

      where did you learn this stupid saying from tiktok?

  • @alansantos9312
    @alansantos9312 Рік тому +2

    I'm still a bit confused, so can we purchase normal capacity mags now or do we still have to wait for the appeal.?

  • @NumPad
    @NumPad Рік тому +154

    Pretty nuts to me how they can just appeal and appeal and appeal.
    Like a 5-year-old asking Dad when Mom already said No.

    • @Zerowolf760
      @Zerowolf760 Рік тому +9

      Right, I thought this was final because it's the second time the ruling has been determined after the 1st appeal.

    • @LeonSwiss
      @LeonSwiss Рік тому +4

      why would they stop when there are no consequences?

    • @SargentD4
      @SargentD4 Рік тому

      Firearms were never given as a constitutional right for simply hunting or defending your home. The main concern from the founders was a tyrannical government in control of America and look where we are.

    • @SeraphsWitness
      @SeraphsWitness Рік тому +1

      We can too. It cuts both ways.

    • @SeraphsWitness
      @SeraphsWitness Рік тому

      No, it went up to the Supreme Court and then was remanded back to the District level with new guidelines after the Bruin ruling. Now they're still disagreeing. Which means it's going back to the SCOTUS.@@Zerowolf760

  • @scottbalbas7752
    @scottbalbas7752 Рік тому +11

    JUDGE BENITESZ WORDS ARE SIMPLE , ELIQUINT TRUTH!! HIS WORDS MAKE ME PROUD TO BE HIS FELLOW AMERICAN!!

  • @michaelrains2268
    @michaelrains2268 Рік тому +30

    Standard capacity magazines is the correct technology!

    • @toddmorningstar4206
      @toddmorningstar4206 Рік тому

      According to who?

    • @michaelrains2268
      @michaelrains2268 Рік тому +1

      @@toddmorningstar4206 The millions of legal firearms owners in the US and the thousands of licensed ffl dealers. If we were the problem, you wouldn't have to question!
      Enjoy a blessed Saturday

    • @InternetArbiter
      @InternetArbiter Рік тому

      The manufacturers, like Glock, who produce the Glock 17 with a standard 17 round magazine, and the Glock 19 with a standard 15 round magazine. Not to mention the AR platforms where 30 rounds is standard. You know "todd" in Dutch means fart, and that's about all your brain is good at doing.@@toddmorningstar4206

    • @KingDevilX666
      @KingDevilX666 5 місяців тому

      You mean terminology 😂

  • @HoangNguyen-x5x3s
    @HoangNguyen-x5x3s Рік тому +1

    beside the 30-round mag ban (which is the standard magazine size), I also still don't understand why the featureless grip is supposed to make an AR15 less deadly

  • @yezkaholic
    @yezkaholic Рік тому +2

    So are they legal to purchase or just to possess?

  • @Chretze
    @Chretze Рік тому +207

    The scam begins with calling standard 30 round mags "high capacity" as if they weren't the absolute default designed for their respective firearms. 20 round mags are "reduced capacity" and were designed to make it easier to go prone and using bipod on a long rifle, and these 10 round mags are so far reduced beyond any reasonable argument that they can never, ever be called "standard capacity" by any stretch of the imagination. If the people pushing for the ban had any shred of integrity, they'd call it "civilian legal capacity" or something that at least aligns with their intentions, but because they are filthy liars and they know damn well that their intentions do not align with the constitution at all they have to lie to your face by calling 10 round mags "standard".

    • @Oculed1
      @Oculed1 Рік тому

      Thank you yes, this is very important to understand. So much of the wording used by these demons concerning guns is used specifically to spread fear and confuse ignorant voters.

    • @toosicc2true
      @toosicc2true Рік тому +3

      💯

    • @incidentcommandr
      @incidentcommandr Рік тому +5

      Usage of the term ‘high capacity’ makes them complicit in the scam

    • @BarnDoor-won5ve
      @BarnDoor-won5ve Рік тому

      Where people go wrong is assuming these damned people are stupid or are naively driven for some skewed sense of "the greater good". They're not. They know good and well what they say, what they purpose and don't honestly believe for a second that they're making the world a safer place for humanity. Therefore, one can only come to the logical conclusion that they're purposefully controlling and destroying humanity. Therefore, why in God's name anyone would truly believe that they can fight the system using the system and that voting is anything other than an illusion of choice and control is beyond me😂. They're going to do whatever they want they only thing that matters is how long each individual will continue to freely participate upon their own cognition in this system of oppression and debt slavery. These a*S holes only have power because we keep giving it to them every second we choose to keep participating in THEIR system under THEIR rules

    • @bigmike8808
      @bigmike8808 Рік тому

      There are a lot of made up terms in order to gaslight the American people. This just scratches the surface and hopefully this is only the beginning of winning our freedoms back.

  • @bandanabanana3162
    @bandanabanana3162 Рік тому +66

    It's about to be hard to find magazines in the rest of the country for a while!😂😂

    • @CannonCountry
      @CannonCountry Рік тому +29

      I honestly hope so.
      Yall deserve them. And I hope yall can kick the roster too.

    • @matterofrights2344
      @matterofrights2344 Рік тому +6

      Doubtful, detachable firearm magazines can be produced like tic-tacs.

    • @jamesarmyvet
      @jamesarmyvet Рік тому +2

      FREEDOM!!!!

    • @dummgelauft
      @dummgelauft Рік тому +2

      No it's not. Nothing has changed.

    • @jasony9950
      @jasony9950 Рік тому

      @@matterofrights2344during freedom week, ALL shipments went to California. So it will be a repeat gold rush. If you want more mags, get them in before California does but don’t worry. They’re still not legal, as The AG will appeal it and further legislation will take place. Nothing new in California

  • @timo2571
    @timo2571 Рік тому +29

    Thanks Steven. As a former Sud Californican who unfortunately lost my freedom week mags when I moved out for nearly equal pay and a much lower cost of living. I was greatly heartened one of my friends who cleaned up after my hectic departure actually found all of them and is now taking very good care of them as they're now readily available for me and hopefully soon will be for all my freedom loving friends still in Cali-4-knee-a. Sorry, can't resist a jab even as a long awaited breath of freedom is coming. I'm happy for for you all.

  • @BW-kv9wj
    @BW-kv9wj Рік тому +2

    So, as of today Oct 28, 2023, is it legal to possess these magazines in California or is it still under appeal?

  • @krown4d
    @krown4d Рік тому +2

    didn't it get kicked back to 11 panel to make a ruling by Oct .

  • @619dunner
    @619dunner Рік тому +127

    I want to know why there is no punishment for those who make unconstitutional laws like this. My rights were violated and I want someone to be punished for it!

    • @jaminova_1969
      @jaminova_1969 Рік тому +9

      If a corporation violated someone's rights you bet your life there would be a lawsuit!

    • @daviddel991
      @daviddel991 Рік тому +19

      This should fall under the umbrella of treason and the people who write these unconstitutional laws should be prosecuted.

    • @Adrian-yi8fl
      @Adrian-yi8fl Рік тому +2

      That is the giant gaping hole in the Constitution. It will be the end of our country

    • @Adrian-yi8fl
      @Adrian-yi8fl Рік тому +3

      @@Plutogalaxy awww someone's bummed because his transition surgery got delayed

    • @619dunner
      @619dunner Рік тому

      @@Plutogalaxy I love how open you shitlibs are being about your fondness of government corruption. Keep this energy though, I don't want to talk politics in 2024. 🤣🤣🤣

  • @sksman71
    @sksman71 Рік тому +27

    Been borne and raised in California. I've been waiting for years for this decision. Thank you Judge Benitez

  • @IDNHANTU2day
    @IDNHANTU2day Рік тому +50

    We still have to wait until more injunctions and delays are resolved.

    • @nonconsensualopinion
      @nonconsensualopinion Рік тому +19

      Yeah, these clickbait titles are going to get somebody in legal trouble when they grab a 15 round magazine and go parading around.

    • @thekingscardboard
      @thekingscardboard Рік тому +14

      That’s what I’m saying. It’s not a win until us Californians have them in our hands legally.

    • @Person0fColor
      @Person0fColor Рік тому +9

      @@nonconsensualopinionit wont stand not here in California.
      Only citizens have to follow the laws politicians and illegal immigrants by their very definition are not subject to the law.

    • @jessebowers819
      @jessebowers819 Рік тому +3

      No, they are most certainly not but cool clickbait title.

    • @mikekling4605
      @mikekling4605 Рік тому +9

      Thats what pisses me off too..dont bug me until they are ACTUALLY legal to buy..

  • @ericedwards8476
    @ericedwards8476 Місяць тому +1

    Bonta states that civilians have no need for magazines that hold more then 10 rounds , well then your law enforcement has no need for their magazines either.. in reality civilians should be able to have magazines that hold 100 rounds if they so choose because it's for our own protection and to protect our loved ones and property

  • @Quadnick
    @Quadnick Рік тому +1

    I don't understand the court process. How many times can CA say to a ruling "No, I don't like that decision. I want to ask someone else." ?

    • @YABUKIJOE2077
      @YABUKIJOE2077 Рік тому

      within the same week. easily, just like the last time during freedom week

  • @T_bone
    @T_bone Рік тому +28

    Military and civilian firearms were identical in function and ability throughout history. As civilians created rifled barrels, multi-barrel systems, projectiles, self-contained cartridges, and smokeless powder, these technologies were adopted for military use. Many of the firearms used in the original militia to fight against the British were rifled muskets that were more accurate, but slower to load and less robust than the smooth bore Brown Bess used by most armies around the world at the time.

    • @Ween745
      @Ween745 Рік тому +3

      We can only speculate, but the NFA and all these other gun control measures have probably stifled firearm development over the past 90 years

    • @T_bone
      @T_bone Рік тому +1

      @Ween745 Demand and military acquisition requests for firearms still drive and arm militaries around the world. IEDs and VBDs were made in houses with simple tools and fertilizer or MGE. F22s and F35s obviously still being developed etc.

    • @danielmanly4793
      @danielmanly4793 Рік тому +1

      Right, the civilian market had autoloading arms well before the military, hell, the US government was still clinging to revolvers into the 1900s!!

  • @TheEmperorsChampion964
    @TheEmperorsChampion964 Рік тому +12

    Give it another few years and the NFA and GCA will both be overturned so long as we keep up the steady pressure and not overplay our hand

  • @MatthewsTrueShow
    @MatthewsTrueShow Рік тому +6

    Living in redding California. The second I saw the notification and read the title. I clicked so quickly. But now feel I wasted my time watching this entire video..

    • @Fernczy
      @Fernczy Рік тому

      You should know living I'm commiefornia nothing ever happens immediately. This won't be resolved for 6 months or more.

  • @Bosco-knows-all
    @Bosco-knows-all 23 дні тому +1

    “Final decision” that immediately goes to appeal.. not so final after all.

  • @RomeoGenX
    @RomeoGenX Рік тому +1

    Judge Benitez Has given the law abiding a right to bear arms against criminals with guns.

  • @jameskrobar7814
    @jameskrobar7814 Рік тому +6

    This was by far the best breakdown in layman’s terms of all the videos on this ruling. Thank you sir!

  • @corrysmith
    @corrysmith Рік тому +11

    Laws that forbid the carrying of arms ... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed one.

  • @robdog7516
    @robdog7516 Рік тому +16

    This isn’t a win YET. They will appeal this to the 9th circus, if they don’t like that decision they will want an on bonk panel in the ninth circus, then if that doesn’t go their way, or ours, it will go to the Supreme Court. This is far from being over and a win.

    • @lynwoodloco77
      @lynwoodloco77 Рік тому +6

      Right. Like someone else commented here, it's not going to feel like an actual win until we can buy standard cap mags off the shelves in California.

  • @E52O4
    @E52O4 Рік тому +2

    Let’s stop calling OEM magazines with more than ten round capacity “high capacity”. In free America they’re called “standard capacity”.

  • @jerryhadler8835
    @jerryhadler8835 Рік тому +5

    Any criminal in California was already and will continue not caring about laws that are trying to be forced upon those that do, only.

  • @pitbullmrwhat73
    @pitbullmrwhat73 Рік тому +10

    Need to bring that to Illinois the maximum capacity in Chicago is 15 rounds for handguns and 10 rounds for long guns legally🤔🧐

    • @codyharney2997
      @codyharney2997 Рік тому +1

      Good thing noone there uses switches and drums or anything like that or you wouldnt have enough shots to fight back...oh wait...

  • @phreshxmetal
    @phreshxmetal Рік тому +33

    I'll celebrate when standard capacity mags are on store shelves. This feels too familiar to believe it will stick

    • @roflryan1
      @roflryan1 Рік тому +1

      Just 3d print them or buy them in disassembled form. Lots of ways around it.

    • @bobbaker1253
      @bobbaker1253 Рік тому +2

      I agree. Keep hearing about all these “wins”, but never see anything in the store.

    • @esti5506
      @esti5506 Рік тому +2

      @@bobbaker1253 Exactly, vid title is clickbait.

    • @jhmonthetube6339
      @jhmonthetube6339 Рік тому

      @@roflryan1, where do you buy disassembled magazines ?

    • @roflryan1
      @roflryan1 Рік тому

      @@jhmonthetube6339 apparently Colorado gun stores sell them to get around the high cap mag ban.

  • @Billy-yu8sk
    @Billy-yu8sk Рік тому +11

    Ive seen plenty of home invasion videos where a 10 rnd magazine wouldn't have been sufficient enough to handle the situation. A lot more such situations not caught on video. There's absolutely no reason for the rest of the nation to have access to 30-50-100 rnd mags & not the east & west coast where sea invasion from an invading army is a real possibility, Not to mention it being their Constitutional Right.
    EDIT: You cant average out self defense situations into percentages when lives are at stake & each situation has so many variables.

  • @Mondodarts
    @Mondodarts Рік тому +1

    I just tried ordering larger capacity AR 15 mags from Midway and they are still not allowing sales to CA. Also, got a question. I still have a kit installed that keeps my mag fixed so I didn't have to register it. That law still in place?

  • @Quesadillius
    @Quesadillius Рік тому +1

    So are they legal now or not? Everyone’s talking about the decision and mentioning the appeal but I can’t find a yes or no. Would 30rnd mags be okay at the range or transportable as of now in CA or no?

  • @Carlos335is
    @Carlos335is Рік тому +35

    The laws should apply to criminals, not the citizens...If a criminal gets caught with any magazines over 10 rds. an extra of 5 or 10 yrs. should be added to their sentence, criminals get a slap on the hand compare to law abiding citizens who follow the laws and go thru the proper requirements to be able to use their 2A rights.

    • @kennychao4143
      @kennychao4143 Рік тому +2

      That would make to much sense. We all know criminals follow the laws and only use 10 round magazines.

    • @bvowels
      @bvowels Рік тому +2

      Real question: Anyone know of a case where a criminal used a standard cap mag in a crime and his sentence was extended because of that? Or, a case where the magazine was specifically cited?

    • @codyharney2997
      @codyharney2997 Рік тому

      What constitutes being a criminal in your eyes?

    • @hansonromero4912
      @hansonromero4912 Рік тому

      Good luck wit that with democraps in power!!!

  • @j-pacplummer6087
    @j-pacplummer6087 Рік тому +2

    THANK YOU JUDGE!!!......
    GOD LUV YA!....😉👍🇺🇲

  • @alberta.4692
    @alberta.4692 Рік тому +27

    Unfortunately, there's a good chance it will be at least another 3-4 years before we'll get any relief since the appeal is going to take time and I highly doubt the 9th will allow this to take effect.

    • @jeffreymcfadden9403
      @jeffreymcfadden9403 Рік тому +6

      The Supremes struck them down once over this issue.
      The Supremes may not be as nice the next time.

    • @UserUser14880
      @UserUser14880 Рік тому +3

      ​@jeffreymcfadden9403 still another 3-4 years. And then again another 3-4 years and then another 3-4 years.
      Get it yet?

    • @iargueta1220
      @iargueta1220 Рік тому +1

      @@UserUser14880that mentality is what allows these corrupt States to take away our rights. Think positive instead of negative, it makes a huge difference

    • @UserUser14880
      @UserUser14880 Рік тому

      @@iargueta1220 i did that the 1st go round. Im trying for the opposite effect this time 🤣

  • @warrenb8228
    @warrenb8228 Рік тому +16

    Bruen decision has saved us. I don’t think people understand how significant of a case that was and it went totally under the radar of normal people.

    • @c.h.u.d
      @c.h.u.d Рік тому

      No you didn't save yourselves you rely on ONE SINGLE JUDGE to fight for you.pitiful

    • @bigmike8808
      @bigmike8808 Рік тому

      Yup!

  • @icmonstahs
    @icmonstahs Рік тому +1

    So are they fully legal now, or did it get shut down again?

  • @abc123fhdi
    @abc123fhdi Рік тому +1

    so can we get standard and actual high capacity magazines now?

  • @EchoGates
    @EchoGates Рік тому +7

    i wish i had the extra cash to buy at least one non CA mag for my two guns

  • @nicholasfortunato7035
    @nicholasfortunato7035 Рік тому +5

    When will it be legal for me to buy standard magazines now after this?

  • @theswagwagon484
    @theswagwagon484 Рік тому +17

    “Standard capacity magazines are now legal” I fixed your title for you

  • @abc123fhdi
    @abc123fhdi Рік тому +1

    so does this mean the ban is overturned for now until they determine otherwise or if the appeal is unsuccessful? Or do they just appeal to the Supreme Court and its final for the whole country? Since 2A is for the whole country and Supreme Court says if there's no tradition of magazine ban you can't do it.

  • @jf7393
    @jf7393 Рік тому +3

    Thanks for the clickbait activism. It really helps the cause.
    For anyone curious: magazine laws unchanged in CA

  • @jasongregory4193
    @jasongregory4193 Рік тому +60

    The second amendment is not just about self defense it's more about fighting tyranny.

    • @ChanceUrtaking
      @ChanceUrtaking Рік тому

      Then it would’ve been used long ago

    • @sigma8995
      @sigma8995 Рік тому

      @@ChanceUrtaking How do you think we got rid of the Brits?

    • @levonkitapszyan6626
      @levonkitapszyan6626 Рік тому

      @sigma8995 the tree of Liberty

    • @ChanceUrtaking
      @ChanceUrtaking Рік тому

      @@sigma8995 have at it.

    • @sigma8995
      @sigma8995 Рік тому

      @bigcoomerloads Let me guess, it isn't muskets that got rid of the Brits. It's keyboard warriors like you?

  • @fakename8856
    @fakename8856 Рік тому +26

    There is no such thing as “high capacity magazines”, they are referring to regular standard capacity magazines.

    • @Chretze
      @Chretze Рік тому

      That's how these filthy liars trick people into supporting the ban. "Nooo silly goyim, we don't wanna ban standard capacity mags! Only high capacity mags, hehehe"

    • @Valhalla_Heathen
      @Valhalla_Heathen Рік тому

      Bingo!

  • @brianerickson8204
    @brianerickson8204 Рік тому +6

    Unfortunately, you can’t buy them yet… He put a 10 day stay on his order, giving the state time to appeal, which they’ve already done. Now it goes back to the 9th circuit I believe.

    • @ergonomiczero2228
      @ergonomiczero2228 Рік тому +3

      Wish these YT channels would address the issue directly and not use clickbaity titles. I can only imagine a bunch of people will go out and buy magazines thinking they are legal due to videos like this

    • @brianerickson8204
      @brianerickson8204 Рік тому +1

      @@ergonomiczero2228 Definitely agree. That’s why I posted that comment.

  • @BensBlades
    @BensBlades Рік тому +1

    God bless St. Benitez and God bless America!!!🇺🇸

  • @areowedoubless
    @areowedoubless Рік тому

    Just tried to order 30 round magazines and online retailers won’t ship to California.

    • @jonmajarucon51
      @jonmajarucon51 Рік тому

      Yeah, I ordered a conversion kit but the Magazine capacity is 15 so they will NOT ship to California

    • @KingDevilX666
      @KingDevilX666 5 місяців тому

      If you payed attention to the video,they are talking about if you currently own not if you plan on buying the magazines

  • @NSResponder
    @NSResponder Рік тому +17

    They were always legal in California. Usurpation is not law.

    • @thelittledetailscr7231
      @thelittledetailscr7231 Рік тому +2

      Ok. Go to a CA range and pop in a 100 round drum. Start firing off rounds and see what happens.

    • @InternetArbiter
      @InternetArbiter Рік тому

      Are you going to approach a man with a 100 round drum mag to start some problems?@@thelittledetailscr7231

  • @JoeCensored
    @JoeCensored Рік тому +8

    On Freedom Week, we would have bought more mags but all the major vendors were out within days.

    • @billyj9168
      @billyj9168 Рік тому +1

      Hours lol

    • @bellinghammond
      @bellinghammond Рік тому

      at the time, were you trying to buy in person or online??

  • @Cicero_1776
    @Cicero_1776 Рік тому +9

    Never let politicians, or government employees, determine what you can and cannot have for your self defense. If it was for their self-defense, they will ask for full auto and f-15s.

  • @kidonspank
    @kidonspank Рік тому +1

    WRONG! US Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the ruling.

  • @doomedspy
    @doomedspy Рік тому +25

    Thank you Mr. Benitez for getting Heller right before Thomas had to tell all the idiot judges the correct way of applying Heller. Thank you Mrs. Duncan for standing up for your rights. And thank you all the 2A advocacy groups who supported this case.

  • @AshGreen359
    @AshGreen359 Рік тому +5

    Not until 10/2 unless the 9th extends the stay. Which they will

  • @The2aAdvocate
    @The2aAdvocate Рік тому +24

    Living in NY. This gives me hope one day certain magazines can finally see the light of day and be recovered from said boating accident.

    • @Joooooooooooosh
      @Joooooooooooosh Рік тому +1

      If they appeal, it'll definitely be upheld in SCOTUS and thus be nationwide.

    • @c.h.u.d
      @c.h.u.d Рік тому

      then why don't you pssies get off your asses and start DEMANDING what YOU the people want from the "leaders" YOU put in office??

    • @Mountainrock70
      @Mountainrock70 Рік тому

      Id love to live in the Adirondacks of NY. But the state laws are insane. Hopefully they do get this mess fixed in the SCOTUS

    • @The2aAdvocate
      @The2aAdvocate Рік тому

      @@Mountainrock70 thats right where I live. You feel like youre in a different world from downstate

  • @yournumberonepal
    @yournumberonepal Рік тому +1

    Standard capacity. 100 round drums are medium capacity. 👍 High capacity starts around 200. 😂

  • @curlyg5453
    @curlyg5453 Рік тому

    So what about the comp mags ? Are they gona b 30 rounds now too? Or are they gona take those off all together

  • @jonathanbautista30
    @jonathanbautista30 Рік тому +4

    Keep these videos coming! I find great value on this, even from Texas 🤠

  • @ninjaman381
    @ninjaman381 Рік тому +18

    Hawaiis magazine law needs to be contested after this decision.

    • @jamesorlong
      @jamesorlong Рік тому

      The law should just be illegal everywhere because the constitution effects all 50 states and protects all citizens within them.

    • @troybullard9631
      @troybullard9631 Рік тому +4

      @ninjaman381 This latest decision by Judge Benitez doesn't just apply to California alone. Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington are also under the jurisdiction of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, and this decision will definitely have an effect on those states. Stay informed, get involved, and keep the faith Bruh !

    • @-_.._._--_.-.-_-_-_-...-.-
      @-_.._._--_.-.-_-_-_-...-.- Рік тому +1

      Yep. CRPA website has the current info.

  • @Whosteeny
    @Whosteeny Рік тому +4

    What about nj we need this

  • @nano3719
    @nano3719 Рік тому +1

    For anyone wondering this is old news, and a different judge has blocked this law from taking effect.

  • @candaceilove
    @candaceilove 14 днів тому

    Thank you for your hard work and salient updates

  • @PTRRanger951
    @PTRRanger951 Рік тому +14

    Only applies 10 days after the decision IF there are no appeals. That’s why suck. You know it’s going to get an appeal and be tied up longer before a final ruling on it.

    • @ergonomiczero2228
      @ergonomiczero2228 Рік тому +1

      Wonder when freedom week 2 going to happen. All these vids lately are mostly click bait

    • @bigmike8808
      @bigmike8808 Рік тому

      It was appealed within 4 hours of the decision.

    • @PTRRanger951
      @PTRRanger951 Рік тому

      @@bigmike8808 yes I know.

  • @jimalvarez5042
    @jimalvarez5042 Рік тому +20

    This was so clearly stated and educational, thank you so much ! The judge is amazing Founding Fathers would be proud he stopped a tyrannical law

  • @hammeredgem.j.c.9030
    @hammeredgem.j.c.9030 Рік тому +31

    It should be absolutely criminal for the state to spend citizens taxes for constant infringement of citizens rights. Those who are pushing the idea should be judged as enemy 1# and not be allowed to cram the courts with such blatant behavior in our system.

    • @HokkaidoSan
      @HokkaidoSan Рік тому

      So criminalize weed?

    • @InternetArbiter
      @InternetArbiter Рік тому

      You just proved there is such thing as stupid questions@@HokkaidoSan

    • @hansonromero4912
      @hansonromero4912 Рік тому +1

      In other ways you are paying their salaries to violate your rights!!!!

    • @HokkaidoSan
      @HokkaidoSan Рік тому

      Did I? Can you explain that to us. You seem smart with that really smart statement @@InternetArbiter

    • @InternetArbiter
      @InternetArbiter Рік тому

      "No taxation without representation" has been hijacked. Now they represent the government, not the people@@hansonromero4912

  • @SrBuho01
    @SrBuho01 Рік тому

    So I can buy high cap mags now ? I tried ordering online and they don’t ship to CA

  • @Takiz831
    @Takiz831 Рік тому +1

    Shall not be infringed!

  • @markpeavy4005
    @markpeavy4005 Рік тому +10

    Thank you, sir for your interpretation! I guess we are really making progress! I live in Alabama but my son lives in San Francisco. Therefore, although we are approaching retirement age I'd never consider moving to California. Now...if we can get a national reciprocity law (purely) we will be good! Although, no matter our wins they constantly get challenged!

    • @GideonShofar37
      @GideonShofar37 Рік тому +4

      California is paradise in terms of land quality and location, its the laws / cost of living and taxes that are making it a nightmare.. but its still there, just needs to be cleaned out.

    • @shawnryan2197
      @shawnryan2197 Рік тому

      Does your son like living in San Francisco?

    • @markpeavy4005
      @markpeavy4005 Рік тому

      He loves it.@@shawnryan2197

  • @chetatkins6008
    @chetatkins6008 Рік тому +4

    Now all of the other states.

  • @genehamilton1272
    @genehamilton1272 Рік тому +6

    Thank you! Your breakdown and delivery of this information is absolutely fantastic! Please keep up the great work! Your speed and clarification in the process really helps those of us vernacularly challenged types.

  • @7temp
    @7temp 9 місяців тому +1

    Keltoff repeter will always prove any cap ban wrong

  • @Wanderingsamurai_life
    @Wanderingsamurai_life 9 місяців тому +6

    7 months later we can still only buy 10 rnd mags

    • @msVon777
      @msVon777 6 місяців тому +1

      I don’t get it. I keep hearing this and other things however we still can’t get nothing and have even less options now.

    • @KingDevilX666
      @KingDevilX666 5 місяців тому

      @@msVon777that’s because like most UA-camrs and channels like these,they are a bunch click baiters and just using our emotions and lack of freedoms to make a dime out of us because we are dumb enough to click on these useless videos. It took me awhile to realize this lol

  • @mdubb4855
    @mdubb4855 Рік тому +5

    In most cases they AREN'T "high capacity" magazines - which creates an image of an evil war monger - they are simply the stock magazines provided by the manufacturer. I don't even consider the G26 with a 15 round to be high capacity, it's how Glock designed it (and in some ways perfected by Springfield XD their slip on magazine sleeves to fill in the gap).

    • @codyharney2997
      @codyharney2997 Рік тому +1

      15 rounds isnt high capacity in any fashion. And 27 and 30rnd mags have been around for years and years. And have definitely surpassed common use. And either are necessary for a firearm to function and protected by the 2A or they arent and cannot be regulated using 2A grounds.

  • @jessemartinez8158
    @jessemartinez8158 2 місяці тому +3

    Whats the update in 11/2024 ?

  • @juicesgv12
    @juicesgv12 Рік тому

    So am i able to purchase a 30 round magazine now at my local gun store

  • @kashproductions619
    @kashproductions619 9 місяців тому +1

    Is this in effect??...Because I've been told that this has been appealed and in doing so we still can't have more than 10rds legally...

  • @LittleBozo
    @LittleBozo Рік тому +14

    Hey Steven, that was quite simply the best summary of this law suite I've heard yet. Could you tell me where we stand on getting rid of this terrible handgun roster in California? I'm a new gun buyer in California. I'm disgusted at the choices given to me by a clearly unconstitutional gun roster that limits my ability to protect myself and my family. Thanks, a new subscriber.