in reality scammer gains nothing because of the bills, probably wasted some fees and shit. But yes, he should have had to pay himself, tbh it's always the police's fault for not being thorough or explaining things fully. I'm sure that one witness was much more adamant in person.
Situations like the second one are exactly why I'm getting a front and rear dash cam for my next car. I have hip pain everyday so I could easily go to the hospital and complain about that and have a record made of it. I truly believe that man didn't run into the guy with his car. Why would a witness, who didn't know either party, be saying that they believe the guy threw himself on the ground if he actually didnt do that? What do they have to gain from lying?
The second case that plaintiff was scamming plain and simple. He shouldn't have been awarded anything. The defendant should sue him for harassment. Smh.
We don't have enough proof whether the Plaintiff was scamming or not. Now if there was video proof from a security camera, or if both men brought in witnesses, that'd be a different story. But as Jerry said, he can ONLY give his verdict on what's been given to him; and that's the medical papers and such! I do agree that this is fishy on the Plaintiff's part though and suggest to the Defendant that he takes action by taking the scammer to another court for fraudulence.
TLDR: The second case was incorrectly awarded. The plaintiff had a bill but not have a doctor statement do it saying it was from that event that he had an injoury. The EMT more proximate to the event saw no injury and this kind of injury would have been immediately visible. The defence lined up with an independent witness and the Police report found that the car had not only not hit him but that the pedestrian had hit the car. Also, the plaintiff said he was wearing earphones and not paying attention to the surrounding area when the event happened meaning he was not doing his part to pervent an accident himself. This was also a preponderance case and the evidence heavily supports the defendant and the case should have been thus ruled. Jerry is a bad judge.
First case was so petty and didn't have to end like it did, second case Jerry wrong for giving that scammer money. Even with dashcam you can still scam people and commit fraud
The 2nd case, plaintiff is full of bs, if you go into the emergency room and treated they will give you a summary of your visit of what you came into the ER for and the results of test done to you and diagnose what is wrong with you and the plaintiff only gave judge jerry a piece of paper of just medicine, he is so full of it.
As a pharmacist, and I believe the plaintiff on the second case was lying through his teeth. There actually are diagnosis codes for being hit by a motor vehicle that would have been on the discharge summary if it actually occurred. There would have also been prescriptions for wound care; these accidents are normally bloody once you hit the floor. “Hip pain on the sciatic nerve” is a chronic condition that’s more from wear and tear on the body over time. I wish this case got dismissed.
Yea but being an offender could mean anything from a heinous crime to he slept with his 17 year old gf when he was 18. If it was heinous I think the defendant would have added that in.
Oh Jerry... That medical report basically says they didn't find anything wrong with him, but he was complaining of pain. They have to put in a diagnosis of WHY he came in, and a diagnosis of "pain of hip without sciatica" just means he has pain but there's no sign of what caused the pain, they didn't list any bruising, swelling, etc that would have indicated an actual injury, and would have been in the medical summary...
Right and it's could have been an injury he had in the past. For someone to say he threw himself, than for that man harassing him. As the defended I would sue him back
I got knocked down by a reversing car driven by an elderly man. He didn’t even notice that he had hit me. I just brushed myself off and went shopping. 🤷♀️
Who can afford a new place to live which costs the same amount as this lady wants, two months rent and security deposit, and not this lady wants all this money for her moving out?
The defendant had a WITNESS that stated he through himself on the ground. If this case had been heard by Judge Judy, she would have laughed the plaintiff out of the room. Not going to waste my time with these "episodes" anymore.
With the girls situation. That one chick had no right to request money for months she wasn't there just for damages. For the men part. She Plantiff could already have had those injuries before and he reactived by throwing him self on the floor. It I was the Defedent I would ask the police to look on the cameras outside.
On report from the witness that doesn't even know either one of them says that the guy just randomly threw himself on the ground and didn't get hit. That shows he's scamming
#U TELL DRAMA QWEEN THREW HIMSELF @* THE CAR****. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😲😱😂😂😂😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒 #CAN U IMAGINE IF U DIDNT KNOW THE PERSON TOO; HOW EFFIN AWKWARD!!!😂😂😂😂😂😒😒😒😒😒🤐🤐🤐
"bc my teeth" "bc my adrenaline" "Idk why I didn't go in the ambulance"
On the 2nd case Jerry was wrong for giving the scammer plaintiff money
in reality scammer gains nothing because of the bills, probably wasted some fees and shit. But yes, he should have had to pay himself, tbh it's always the police's fault for not being thorough or explaining things fully. I'm sure that one witness was much more adamant in person.
Agreed looks like he got compensated for throwing himself on the ground very disappointed I would appeal before he gets 1 cent from me
This is why I won’t live with friends, something toxic happens and ruins it
RIP JERRY
YOU'LL BE
MISSED
In the second one that guy was just lying. Glad it was 3,000 but why pay anything at all if there was a witness that said he jumped onto the car
Wasn’t^*
Situations like the second one are exactly why I'm getting a front and rear dash cam for my next car. I have hip pain everyday so I could easily go to the hospital and complain about that and have a record made of it. I truly believe that man didn't run into the guy with his car. Why would a witness, who didn't know either party, be saying that they believe the guy threw himself on the ground if he actually didnt do that? What do they have to gain from lying?
second case- this is why vehicles should all have both a dash cam AND a back-up cam to catch it form in front and behind.
This is WHY its not a good idea to libe with a friend...
Fr
The second case that plaintiff was scamming plain and simple. He shouldn't have been awarded anything. The defendant should sue him for harassment. Smh.
i love this show so much.
Me too ☺️
How did he rule in favor of the plaintiff for the second case. That man was scamming. This show is completely fake.
We don't have enough proof whether the Plaintiff was scamming or not. Now if there was video proof from a security camera, or if both men brought in witnesses, that'd be a different story.
But as Jerry said, he can ONLY give his verdict on what's been given to him; and that's the medical papers and such!
I do agree that this is fishy on the Plaintiff's part though and suggest to the Defendant that he takes action by taking the scammer to another court for fraudulence.
@@CooperGal24 the police report is all that is needed their was an independent witness. Secondly the medical records were not detailed
dash cam is very helpfull
I have 2 lOl
TLDR: The second case was incorrectly awarded.
The plaintiff had a bill but not have a doctor statement do it saying it was from that event that he had an injoury. The EMT more proximate to the event saw no injury and this kind of injury would have been immediately visible. The defence lined up with an independent witness and the Police report found that the car had not only not hit him but that the pedestrian had hit the car. Also, the plaintiff said he was wearing earphones and not paying attention to the surrounding area when the event happened meaning he was not doing his part to pervent an accident himself. This was also a preponderance case and the evidence heavily supports the defendant and the case should have been thus ruled. Jerry is a bad judge.
Because he’s not really a judge
@@Brightbeginningssolutions I know it is very obvious.
First case was so petty and didn't have to end like it did, second case Jerry wrong for giving that scammer money. Even with dashcam you can still scam people and commit fraud
i just keep seeing him on his other show in my head. lol
The 2nd case, plaintiff is full of bs, if you go into the emergency room and treated they will give you a summary of your visit of what you came into the ER for and the results of test done to you and diagnose what is wrong with you and the plaintiff only gave judge jerry a piece of paper of just medicine, he is so full of it.
Right
I love you videos 💓💓💓
As a pharmacist, and I believe the plaintiff on the second case was lying through his teeth. There actually are diagnosis codes for being hit by a motor vehicle that would have been on the discharge summary if it actually occurred. There would have also been prescriptions for wound care; these accidents are normally bloody once you hit the floor.
“Hip pain on the sciatic nerve” is a chronic condition that’s more from wear and tear on the body over time.
I wish this case got dismissed.
I love everything about that UA-cam channel.
The plaintiff is a liar and a drama queen in the second case
😂😂😂😂That’s not in the medical report 😂😂😂😂😂
Did he say he is an offender?
Yea but being an offender could mean anything from a heinous crime to he slept with his 17 year old gf when he was 18. If it was heinous I think the defendant would have added that in.
Yup right before saying he has 2 young daughters at home.
He's been an offender since 2004, and a couple years ago he was charged with trying to abduct a woman 🥴
That guy in the second clip who “got hit by a car” would definitely be that person in highschool who cried if they got a 97 instead of a 98💀
Oh Jerry... That medical report basically says they didn't find anything wrong with him, but he was complaining of pain. They have to put in a diagnosis of WHY he came in, and a diagnosis of "pain of hip without sciatica" just means he has pain but there's no sign of what caused the pain, they didn't list any bruising, swelling, etc that would have indicated an actual injury, and would have been in the medical summary...
Right and it's could have been an injury he had in the past. For someone to say he threw himself, than for that man harassing him. As the defended I would sue him back
I got knocked down by a reversing car driven by an elderly man. He didn’t even notice that he had hit me.
I just brushed myself off and went shopping. 🤷♀️
She is heated because her underarms look sweaty 🤣🤣
Jerry finally disappointed me with a verdict.. that conman shouldn't have gotten a penny.
The guy who threw himself on the ground shouldn’t of gotten anything. If he was that injured he would of taken the ambulance when they showed up.
Jerry need to refund his money on the second case especially when the witness said he threw his self on the ground
Wow so even with a witness saying “ he threw him self down” the guy still has to pay the 510.00 wow BAD CALL all the way around
In the first case, WHY ON EARTH WOULD SHE PAY HER FOR WHEN SHE DIDN'T LIVE THERE
'bodily severely problem'
Who can afford a new place to live which costs the same amount as this lady wants, two months rent and security deposit, and not this lady wants all this money for her moving out?
WHAT DOES YOUR TEETH HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING????
I liked Jerry on his original show..
33 got damn
The defendant had a WITNESS that stated he through himself on the ground. If this case had been heard by Judge Judy, she would have laughed the plaintiff out of the room. Not going to waste my time with these "episodes" anymore.
I have been watching jerry for an hour and those carpet stains were in two videos. Anyone else see this.
He is Jerry what do y’all expect he ain’t no real judge
Well he is a judge by license but it seems like he's not the most experienced best judge at least yet
I know u lie n I need the fight bell 🛎
His teeth didn't like that from no car accident. I know meth when I see it.
😂😂😂😂💕
She looks like Ashley Bautista
Jerry a buster for this
With the girls situation. That one chick had no right to request money for months she wasn't there just for damages.
For the men part. She Plantiff could already have had those injuries before and he reactived by throwing him self on the floor. It I was the Defedent I would ask the police to look on the cameras outside.
Black guy is trying to run away from his responsibilities
On report from the witness that doesn't even know either one of them says that the guy just randomly threw himself on the ground and didn't get hit. That shows he's scamming
So Jerry was completely wrong on the second one plaintiff shouldn't have gotten nothing he wasn't hit by nothing but an ugly stick
Wow I had no idea Jerry was a judge ! HOW COOL ❤️💜💙💚💚🧡❤️❤️💜💙💚🧡❤️💙💙💚🧡❤️❤️💜💙💚🧡❤️💜💜💙💙
#U TELL DRAMA QWEEN THREW HIMSELF @* THE CAR****.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😲😱😂😂😂😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒
#CAN U IMAGINE IF U DIDNT KNOW THE PERSON TOO; HOW EFFIN AWKWARD!!!😂😂😂😂😂😒😒😒😒😒🤐🤐🤐
I don't believe Jerry is running such an entertaining and informative show.
Clickbait title
She is so uppity
First girl needs some better deodorant lol the sweat marks under her arms 🤨
Not a good look
Jerry Sucked on that one