Mean Drift Velocity - A Level Physics

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 59

  • @rhiandavies6926
    @rhiandavies6926 9 років тому +181

    It may be easier to remember it using the phrase "I never" so that I = nevA

    • @PhysicsOnline
      @PhysicsOnline  9 років тому +47

      +Rhian Davies Excellent. So obvious now you've said it, I'll be using that from now on!

    • @unravel9716
      @unravel9716 11 місяців тому

      I always just remembered it as nave but that's good too

    • @nevasimsek1
      @nevasimsek1 4 місяці тому

      @@PhysicsOnline I always rember it as I = nevA too because of my name! When I found out my name literally spells out current in our class I was elated and made the I am Current joke too many times at the weks to follow :)

  • @TheRustAdmin
    @TheRustAdmin 5 років тому +27

    good to find a well-spoken youtube teacher with good handwriting, I subscribed!

    • @mrbacon6089
      @mrbacon6089 3 роки тому

      Practising your Rust electricity logic?

  • @wyseass
    @wyseass 6 років тому +45

    That's such a nice satisfying pen

    • @saferehman8234
      @saferehman8234 4 роки тому

      lol ik i just bought a pack if em becasye of this

  • @sgsnake2x
    @sgsnake2x 4 роки тому +9

    loving the lego examples! subbed!

  • @akakakakakakakakakakakakakak
    @akakakakakakakakakakakakakak 5 років тому +4

    this 4 min vid is better than the 1h lesson

  • @sidt36
    @sidt36 8 років тому +8

    These videos are seriously underrated(It saved my scores)

  • @threesometeckerz2507
    @threesometeckerz2507 9 років тому +5

    LOVE THIS SIR KEEP THE GOOD WORK UP REALLY HELPFUL LOVE THESE BEST SUB IVE EVER MADE

  • @aqeelahlam
    @aqeelahlam 8 років тому +8

    Amazing Videos, everything's simplified. I recommend this to anyone doing A-Level physics. Do you by any chance make these types of videos for chemistry as well?

    • @PhysicsOnline
      @PhysicsOnline  8 років тому +8

      Thanks for the compliment. I'm only doing physics at the moment and there are still so many more videos to make on this topic. So no plans to make similar videos for chemistry at this time.

    • @aqeelahlam
      @aqeelahlam 8 років тому +7

      +A Level Physics Online
      I Completely understand, keep up the great work. :)

  • @calicoesblue4703
    @calicoesblue4703 2 роки тому +1

    Great Video & Very Informative.

  • @JuiceBoxBoiii
    @JuiceBoxBoiii 8 років тому +4

    Awesome video! Clearing all my doubts! Is there a video on work energy and power?

  • @albertriber8853
    @albertriber8853 8 років тому +6

    Hi, thank you for another cool video :-)! I have a question: When you describe 'n' on the paper, should it not then be "number of charged carriers per volume", since we are multiplying with the volume when finding the current? I think you say it this way, but I was a little puzzled by the different writing.

    • @PhysicsOnline
      @PhysicsOnline  8 років тому +4

      +Albert Riber You're right. It should be the number of charge carriers per cubic metre.

  • @thePWord101
    @thePWord101 5 років тому +2

    What exam board is this? My teacher's doing AQA says I should learn it.

  • @puravalva9157
    @puravalva9157 3 роки тому

    600th like. u deserve it

  • @joshuamulley9207
    @joshuamulley9207 9 років тому +4

    For the cross sectional
    Area of the wire, is it (pie*radius^2) ?

    • @fazedank4537
      @fazedank4537 8 років тому

      +Joshua Mulley Yeah, he said Pi D^2 for some reason :/

    • @PhysicsOnline
      @PhysicsOnline  8 років тому +9

      +Osman Ahmed I said Pi D^2 over by 4 which is the same as Pi r^2. This is because you often measure the diameter of the wire not the radius.

    • @fazedank4537
      @fazedank4537 8 років тому

      A Level Physics Online Ohh right, my bad, thanks xD

  • @projirali3664
    @projirali3664 3 роки тому

    Just a mistake to point out: 1:38 , it is a density, not how many there are, so when we multiply by volume we get how many

  • @abdulazizalharbi6228
    @abdulazizalharbi6228 4 роки тому +1

    hi Lewis, you denoted n for (the number of charger carriers) and e for (a charge, which I believe you mean the electron), but what is the difference between the charge and the charge carriers?

    • @theMadZakuPilot
      @theMadZakuPilot 4 роки тому

      According to my understanding,
      Charge carriers are electrons.
      Charge is what moves along the circuit and is carried by the charge carriers.

  • @oh_no
    @oh_no 8 років тому +1

    I think there is a small error - n is the number of electrons per unit volume and the SI unit should therefore be m^-3, rather than just a number. Very good video all said

    • @PhysicsOnline
      @PhysicsOnline  8 років тому +3

      You are correct. Because it's the number per cubic metre it should have the units of m^-3.

  • @ramsha-ky5fc
    @ramsha-ky5fc 11 місяців тому +1

    thank you!!!!

  • @physics11b32
    @physics11b32 5 років тому +2

    Doesn't n, number density of charge carriers per unit volume, have a unit of m^-3?

    • @TheRustAdmin
      @TheRustAdmin 5 років тому

      the unit would have to be n/m^3
      a unit cannot start with an operation such as divide aka 'per'
      hope this helped :)

  • @Mirsab
    @Mirsab 5 років тому

    3:38 How/Why did you bring "v" up?

    • @joshuaholloway7799
      @joshuaholloway7799 5 років тому

      nlAe was divided by l/v. Therefore it becomes nlAe multiplied by v, divided by l. Hence nAev.

  • @gloriaadebayo546
    @gloriaadebayo546 8 років тому +1

    do you have to know this for the AQA AS physics exam as I cannot see to find it on the spec?!

    • @PhysicsOnline
      @PhysicsOnline  8 років тому +4

      +Gloria Adebayo You don't need to know this for the AQA exams.

  • @chriswesley594
    @chriswesley594 5 років тому

    Eh? At 2:27 you say the number of free electrons = nlA. But n is the number of electrons. But if n is the number of charge carriers, aren't those charge carriers electrons? You also refer to n as "charge density" - but n is a simple number and doesn't have the units of density, so - in a sea of satiosfied worshippers - I am confused. I see you don't typically answer people so if anyone else can explain this for me i'd appreciate it.

    • @chriswesley594
      @chriswesley594 5 років тому +1

      OK I found the answer. n is NOT the number of charge carriers, as you have written. It is the charge carrier DENSITY. That is a seriously confusing mistake to make!

  • @harischastoukis8471
    @harischastoukis8471 7 років тому +3

    thank you so much you are amazing!!!!

  • @Ward530
    @Ward530 2 роки тому +2

    Does this apply to AQA a level sir?

    • @PhysicsOnline
      @PhysicsOnline  2 роки тому +2

      No it doesn’t, but it does for OCR.

  • @Bugra0528
    @Bugra0528 9 років тому +3

    Very clear ( Quality )

  • @manavshah6811
    @manavshah6811 8 років тому +1

    good video. WHICH PEN IS THAT? its awesome!

    • @PhysicsOnline
      @PhysicsOnline  8 років тому

      Pilot V Sign Medium - a bit thick for writing normal notes, but it writes real nice!

  • @karmankaur6254
    @karmankaur6254 8 років тому

    Do you have any vids specific to 2016 edexcel AS physics ??

    • @PhysicsOnline
      @PhysicsOnline  8 років тому

      +Karman Kaur I've not made any specific Edexcel videos yet. Which content are you after?

    • @karmankaur6254
      @karmankaur6254 8 років тому

      Moments which are new in the syllabus

  • @mrmysterious1724
    @mrmysterious1724 5 років тому

    is this part of aqa

  • @tcritt
    @tcritt 9 років тому

    Do we have to be able to derive the formula for A level?

    • @PhysicsOnline
      @PhysicsOnline  9 років тому +2

      +timcritt I don't think you have to be able to derive it, but I think it's a good idea to understand where these equations come from.

    • @g-shockforlife1703
      @g-shockforlife1703 5 років тому

      Yes

  • @sharki11
    @sharki11 6 років тому +1

    shouldnt n be the number of electrons PER UNIT VOLUME?

  • @anthonyzammit4088
    @anthonyzammit4088 6 років тому

    tks brother

  • @willsonbasyal7883
    @willsonbasyal7883 8 років тому

    Amazing work! I would love to get your facebook account!!

    • @PhysicsOnline
      @PhysicsOnline  8 років тому

      +Willson Basyal facebook.com/alevelphysicsonline/

  • @tomaljar3996
    @tomaljar3996 3 роки тому

    face reveal?!?¬??!!??!!