Bad optimization. I have a series x and s. The series s should perfectly lock this Game at 60fps. The visuals are completely last gen. A lot of people say the series s is a potato. It is not a potato. The series s runs metro exodus with full ray traced global Illumination at 60 locked. The series s just needs extra optimization that some studios don't do. I understand must be complex to release a Game with so many platforms and hardware.
This is partially correct. No, Series S is not a potato, and a lot of studios are not willing to optimize their games to take full advantage of its potential, but it’s also true that its GPU is weak in comparison to XSX and PS5, and even when the studios are willing to optimize as much as they can, there’s only so much they can do, i.e. Larian with BG3 was unable to make local co-op run on XSS despite delaying the launch on Xbox for that very reason, and they ended up dropping that mode on XSS
Series X is definately smoother after latest patch. Basically they are the same though. Nobody would pick a difference unless you analise , sorry analyse like Digital Foundry do just to continue a silly non existent console war lol.
soooo for u the xbox is "definitely smoother" but then u say they run the same !! obviously u are a xbox fan soo u choose your platform to be smoother (okey fair enough)
it's not a console war, it's console against pc war. If a pc with much better hardware performs worse than a console you know that the developer doesn't care
Your thumbnail is misleading, what I'm seeing is virtually an identical performance with variations in spots between the series x and ps5. Sometimes the x is 1 or 2 point higher sometimes the ps5 is.
That's how this channel works... people know ps5's gpu is weaker but in most cases it doesn't really show in comparison to Xbox series x. With that idea in mind, having the PS5 in the thumbnail look weaker is perfect bait. So... it's just how youtube works.
@@nandino5202 spotted with some fake results, filters, zoom... Gave no accurate or fake numbers different than digital foundry, vgtech and ign (nxg) that show same results
Según veo aunque el video esta divido en 3 partes la verdad es que series X si tiene más detalles y mejores sombras etc pensaría que por eso bajan más los fps aunque en la jugabilidad no creo que sea notable pero series X más potencia
As a multi console gamer , i tried it out on series x since its in game pass free. Tried on friends ps5 and sometimes frames drop more dramatically on it. but i keep these type games more on the ps5 and FPS and sims on series x. Just don't want to have to pay for it on ps5 when i don't on series x.
What’s with the praise this game gets. Looks like $hit. Graphics look like late 360 era, doesn’t run all that great clearly and it’s frustrating as hell. Why wouldn’t you just play Elden Ring
Lots of drops to 58 or 59 on all systems (microstutter). You will eventually notice these and get annoyed. Looks like the game is not even properly optimized on consoles, so pathetic.
For some games like Hogwarts the graphics are pretty good but still not good enough to justify the horrible performance. This game genuinely looks 2 console generations old. Like... it looks horrible, and it isn't running amazing either. Like wtf.
It is when you think about it. The PS5 is set up for last gen graphics so it makes sense the devs have to do far less to optimise. It is WB we are talking about too who are more interested in money than optimisation lol. Once you explore the castle Hogwarts is kind of boring and so so anyway. Outside of puzzles there's nothing very interesting about the game sadly. At least in the 360 game you could play chess.
Bad optimization. I have a series x and s. The series s should perfectly lock this Game at 60fps. The visuals are completely last gen. A lot of people say the series s is a potato. It is not a potato. The series s runs metro exodus with full ray traced global Illumination at 60 locked. The series s just needs extra optimization that some studios don't do. I understand must be complex to release a Game with so many platforms and hardware.
This is partially correct. No, Series S is not a potato, and a lot of studios are not willing to optimize their games to take full advantage of its potential, but it’s also true that its GPU is weak in comparison to XSX and PS5, and even when the studios are willing to optimize as much as they can, there’s only so much they can do, i.e. Larian with BG3 was unable to make local co-op run on XSS despite delaying the launch on Xbox for that very reason, and they ended up dropping that mode on XSS
Series X is definately smoother after latest patch. Basically they are the same though. Nobody would pick a difference unless you analise , sorry analyse like Digital Foundry do just to continue a silly non existent console war lol.
soooo for u the xbox is "definitely smoother" but then u say they run the same !! obviously u are a xbox fan soo u choose your platform to be smoother (okey fair enough)
it's not a console war, it's console against pc war.
If a pc with much better hardware performs worse than a console you know that the developer doesn't care
@@juny_jack either way if you have freesync/VRR capable tv your good.
Your thumbnail is misleading, what I'm seeing is virtually an identical performance with variations in spots between the series x and ps5. Sometimes the x is 1 or 2 point higher sometimes the ps5 is.
That's how this channel works... people know ps5's gpu is weaker but in most cases it doesn't really show in comparison to Xbox series x. With that idea in mind, having the PS5 in the thumbnail look weaker is perfect bait. So... it's just how youtube works.
yeah this game could run on the 360/ps3 no problem... it looks poor
@@peattisma1489yes on a ps2 too right? Lmao dude probably could but at 720p and 20 unstable fps relax a little xd
@@Joe_Ikari hell, at this point we might as well just run it off a Commodore 64
Lmao theres moments where Ps5 goes down to 49 fps whereas the SX does not
Idk I feel like this game does not work in 30fps
It's 60 fps for sires s
is it?
Trust digital foundry, vgtech, nxgamer, ign... = True accurate analyse.
But not this fake guy like elanalista
(Thumbnail is trap).
Facts
whats wrong with elanalista?
@@nandino5202 spotted with some fake results, filters, zoom...
Gave no accurate or fake numbers different than digital foundry, vgtech and ign (nxg) that show same results
What's wrong with El Analista de Bits? I've been reading for a long time bad things about him, specially from Xbox fanboys. 🧐🧐
@@MrKutKuGaruga96 Xbox fanboys hate everybody...
Elanalista isn't accurate and sometime get fake results
A little bit washed up colours on PS5?
Según veo aunque el video esta divido en 3 partes la verdad es que series X si tiene más detalles y mejores sombras etc pensaría que por eso bajan más los fps aunque en la jugabilidad no creo que sea notable pero series X más potencia
loading time ?
Hi can u do some tests with PS5 after this new update? 2160p(Vrr) vs 1440p with vrr(New update). It's change something? I'm curious.
Who is win?
Wait for a true analyse, resolution, picture, shadows, median performance, stutter or not...
Don't trust with channel or enalista.
As a multi console gamer , i tried it out on series x since its in game pass free. Tried on friends ps5 and sometimes frames drop more dramatically on it. but i keep these type games more on the ps5 and FPS and sims on series x. Just don't want to have to pay for it on ps5 when i don't on series x.
Lets microsoft studios teach you how to optimize your games 🙃🙃
What’s with the praise this game gets. Looks like $hit. Graphics look like late 360 era, doesn’t run all that great clearly and it’s frustrating as hell. Why wouldn’t you just play Elden Ring
Lots of drops to 58 or 59 on all systems (microstutter). You will eventually notice these and get annoyed. Looks like the game is not even properly optimized on consoles, so pathetic.
Series X
i put 6 hours into this game and im . . . disappointed
why. Isnt it just nioh 3
For some games like Hogwarts the graphics are pretty good but still not good enough to justify the horrible performance. This game genuinely looks 2 console generations old. Like... it looks horrible, and it isn't running amazing either. Like wtf.
It is when you think about it. The PS5 is set up for last gen graphics so it makes sense the devs have to do far less to optimise. It is WB we are talking about too who are more interested in money than optimisation lol. Once you explore the castle Hogwarts is kind of boring and so so anyway. Outside of puzzles there's nothing very interesting about the game sadly. At least in the 360 game you could play chess.
@@DEVILTAZ35 cope
THIS CHANEEL IS VERY GOOD 👍...THANKS ( OPEN SURPRISE) .