The past, current state & future of JavaScript frameworks

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 січ 2023
  • JavaScript has come a long way! It's a crucial language for modern web development, especially for frontend web development.
    Over all those years, we've seen many JavaScript language features, libraries and frameworks - some stuck around, some didn't.
    Are we now in the last phase of JavaScript framework evolution?
    Join our Academind Community on Discord: academind.com/community
    Check out all our courses: academind.com/courses
    ----------
    • Go to www.academind.com and subscribe to our newsletter to stay updated and to get exclusive content & discounts
    • Follow @maxedapps and @academind_real on Twitter
    • Follow @academind_real on Instagram: / academind_real
    • Join our Facebook community on / academindchannel
    See you in the videos!
    ----------
    Academind is your source for online education in the areas of web development, frontend web development, backend web development, programming, coding and data science! No matter if you are looking for a tutorial, a course, a crash course, an introduction, an online tutorial or any related video, we try our best to offer you the content you are looking for. Our topics include Angular, React, Vue, Html, CSS, JavaScript, TypeScript, Redux, Nuxt.js, RxJs, Bootstrap, Laravel, Node.js, Progressive Web Apps (PWA), Ionic, React Native, Regular Expressions (RegEx), Stencil, Power BI, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Firebase or other topics, make sure to have a look at this channel or at academind.com to find the learning resource of your choice!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 313

  • @revisionfour
    @revisionfour Рік тому +145

    Before jQuery, there was Prototype and Scriptaculous. I'm old and lived through the entire JavaScript evolution.

    • @nikoszervo
      @nikoszervo Рік тому +8

      and coffescript before es6 .

    • @longingbydesign
      @longingbydesign Рік тому +14

      @@nikoszervo And mootools.

    • @arvi8843
      @arvi8843 Рік тому +1

      Hey hey hey you're not alone guys. I lived through all of that too 😂🤦😂

    • @aquaductape
      @aquaductape Рік тому +4

      I might be wrong, Moo tools as well right? Im a 2017 developer, hearing these ancient technologies sounds like medieval shit

    • @zecheng5807
      @zecheng5807 Рік тому +2

      And Dojo Toolkit

  • @stefangarofalo3131
    @stefangarofalo3131 Рік тому +46

    I dont know if this is going to be read but ever since I started my last year in computer science, right before graduating, I jumped into self-teaching because I felt school wasnt teaching me enough. I went on Udemy and found Max. Finally I actually understood something about web dev, front-back and full stack, all the theory I learnt really put into practice. Eventually I landed a job in a Vue/Nuxt based company this late summer. Thanks a lot Max

    • @bunmioke2697
      @bunmioke2697 Рік тому

      This is inspiring. Congrats on your progress.

  • @mohammadz5474
    @mohammadz5474 Рік тому +69

    I feel very safe when i hear Max’s opinions
    Max isn’t just a smart , kind and expert man
    Max is a very logical man
    Thank you for everything max ❤️🙏🏻
    Wish you the best ❤️🙏🏻

    • @vnm_8945
      @vnm_8945 Рік тому +2

      true, I heard about this opinion that it all went backwards by using more backend, but now I understand that doesn't mean that it's a bad thing.

  • @scriptKiddieOG
    @scriptKiddieOG Рік тому +11

    @Academind Hi Max! Investing in your courses has been one of the best decisions I've made to date. One thing I would like to congratulate you on, is the quality of your English and how you have progressed in articulating yourself over the years. I would argue that you are effectively a native speaker now. That in itself is a superb achievement. 👏

  • @VideoBunt
    @VideoBunt Рік тому +61

    I can't believe, that svelte and sveltekit was missed :(

    • @kimbapslayer1995
      @kimbapslayer1995 Рік тому +3

      Fun for side projects and independent devs. Not really widely used in enterprise or big companies from what I find

    • @OzzyTheGiant
      @OzzyTheGiant Рік тому +6

      @@kimbapslayer1995 Let's change that. Rebel against the managers that keep using React for no reason

    • @VideoBunt
      @VideoBunt Рік тому +1

      @@kimbapslayer1995 ok, but from this perspective solid shouldn't be mentioned as well. Pretty sure analog also don't used widely

    • @VideoBunt
      @VideoBunt Рік тому

      Also it good to mention monorepos, e.g. turborepo and nx. Nx could be be very helpful for react, it have great generating tool

    • @AlanDanielx
      @AlanDanielx Рік тому +6

      Because he doesn't sell those courses of Sveltekit

  • @eleah2665
    @eleah2665 Рік тому +1

    Hello Max, I'm working through your Remix class. Great stuff. Thanks.

  • @mutantthegreat7963
    @mutantthegreat7963 Рік тому +1

    Really enjoying learning Remix JS at the moment. One of the reasons is that it sticks very closely to standard web APIs so you're also learning stuff which is common and will always be of benefit, like request and response objects etc.

  • @meenakshighodke2935
    @meenakshighodke2935 Рік тому +8

    Thanks a lot Max for your amazing courses and I am glad to have purchased most of them. You are doing a commendable job by creating content based on lastest technologies in web development. I enjoyed your latest React course update and indeed it's the best.
    Can you please also update your CSS course wherein you explain concepts with demo projects similar to your React course?
    Thanks again and keep up the good work!

  • @rupamsutar9299
    @rupamsutar9299 Рік тому

    Wow max..!
    It's always soo good to hear youu

  • @preetdhiman8480
    @preetdhiman8480 Рік тому +12

    What about svelte and sveltekit ?

  • @sebuzz17
    @sebuzz17 Рік тому +10

    No mention of Svelte ? That's the only tech i'd like to use out of Angular.

  • @tsp4axl
    @tsp4axl Рік тому +1

    Would have loved to hear your take on web assembly and MS Blazor, which, with the combination of Blazor client and server side options, gives you that next gen option you see us going in.

  • @_the_one_1
    @_the_one_1 Рік тому

    Thank you for this video, nice summary and thoughts! What I got from it though, is that you are soon going to lunch a SolidJS course. Awesome!

  • @carinagonzalezruiz1280
    @carinagonzalezruiz1280 Рік тому

    Love your content, thanks for sharing!!

  • @HarpreetSingh-jd3tu
    @HarpreetSingh-jd3tu Рік тому +5

    personally I like svelte. React dyed for me ages ago... its just layers on top of layers to make one thing work right.

  • @eumm11
    @eumm11 Рік тому

    I like this kind of content, thanks Max!

  • @ShinigamiZone
    @ShinigamiZone Рік тому +12

    I'm shocked you managed this video without saying Typescript at least once 😮

  • @MarkRiverbank
    @MarkRiverbank Рік тому +10

    I’m just going to add to the chorus of people who noticed Svelte was conspicuously absent. No, you can’t list all frameworks, but it’s hugely popular and very much fits the next step in the evolutionary progression you listed.

    • @maskman4821
      @maskman4821 Рік тому +4

      Actually there are only six meta frameworks out there~ Sveltekit, Next, Nuxt, Remix, SolidStart, QwikCity and Sveltekit is missing, it is quite interesting that Max ignore it 😅😅😅

    • @maelstrom-qw1jl
      @maelstrom-qw1jl Рік тому

      "hugely popular" - in the YT tutorial world, I guess

  • @aaaaanh
    @aaaaanh Рік тому

    I used Max's course when I started to learn React. I recognize the voice anywhere. Gigachad Max 🙏

  • @XRENDERMAN
    @XRENDERMAN Рік тому +8

    I would say the next evolution is compiling and getting rid of virtual DOM as Solid and Svelte do.

    • @ericg3065
      @ericg3065 Рік тому +1

      Can you please explain compiling. How does Svelte and Solid update the Dom without a virtual DOM?

  • @subalevi
    @subalevi Рік тому

    Hey Max. Thanks for this video. I was expecting you to mention NestJS too. Don't you think it has a future combined with Angular?

  • @KiLVaiDeN
    @KiLVaiDeN Рік тому +20

    Not a single word of Svelte in this overview ? Astonishing. I'm wondering if it's not part of a contract with Meta (and related to your React book) because it looks very much intentional. I think it is crazy to not even have a word about Svelte and Sveltekit, specially after StateOfJS2022 which clearly showed that Svelte is on top and growing.

    • @YuriG03042
      @YuriG03042 Рік тому +4

      bruh moment, get out with these conspiracy theories

    • @KiLVaiDeN
      @KiLVaiDeN Рік тому

      @@YuriG03042 Anybody can give his opinion, it's why comments exist; If you don't like a comment, downvote it, if you don't agree and have arguments you want to share, you are free as well, but telling people to not say what they think because you don't think like them doesn't seem very smart.

    • @academind
      @academind  Рік тому +8

      Of course what I say in the video also applies to / includes Svelte. My goal was not to drop as many framework names as possible but to share my view on the overall landscape - that of course includes ALL frameworks

    • @MarkRiverbank
      @MarkRiverbank Рік тому +2

      Agreed. Svelte was conspicuously absent, given it’s popularity and the fact that it’s already implementing something much closer to the envisioned “next step”…I actually thought the whole video was setting up to highlight it at the end.

    • @Eldalion99999
      @Eldalion99999 Рік тому

      very suspicious indeed

  • @jackdanksterdawson112
    @jackdanksterdawson112 Рік тому

    Max you are amazing!! Love you♥

  • @CodeZakk
    @CodeZakk Рік тому +6

    Thanks your Udemy courses are amazing. I learn react with your course!!!

  • @sealone777
    @sealone777 Рік тому +5

    I was there since HTML 1.0 and I still got IE scar to prove it. I feel web has finally stabilized and I don’t expect another revolutionary to happen anytime soon. My guess is that browser will simply be a streaming software. We no longer need to ensure browser compatibility and can use much more efficient tool than HTML,css, JS.

  • @aquepaique
    @aquepaique Рік тому

    Thanks Max

  • @mma93067
    @mma93067 10 місяців тому +1

    You’re missing out the « back to basics » movement started by HTMX. A JS library write less JS by extending HTML.
    It’s really taking off on the Django world as it brings back django as a proper fullstack framework.

  • @adambickford8720
    @adambickford8720 Рік тому +6

    The jump to the angularjs stage was absolutely giant. Suddenly the UI had its own build tools, package management, etc. You could no longer just drop `app.js` into a lib folder.

    • @kishirisu1268
      @kishirisu1268 10 місяців тому

      With React i just dprop app.js of MyComponent,js and all works perfectly fine.
      Angular is owercomplicated bloatware wasting your time.

    • @adambickford8720
      @adambickford8720 10 місяців тому

      ​@@kishirisu1268 React is compiled. If you don't believe me, ask an actual engineer.

  • @postgradpranay
    @postgradpranay Рік тому +11

    You forgot to mention Svelte and SvelteKit, 2nd most loved JS framework.

    • @academind
      @academind  Рік тому +2

      The video was not about squeezing as many framework names as possible into it but to share some general thoughts on the overall landscape - that obviously includes svelte

    • @nivethan_me
      @nivethan_me Рік тому +1

      yeah its most loved but not most used! I see frequently Svlete users pop up in the chat and reminding everyone to use Svelte but until its secure a job opportunity like Angular or React most people won't care imo

    • @maskman4821
      @maskman4821 Рік тому +3

      There are only seven meta frameworks out there~ Sveltekit, Next, Nuxt, Angular Unuversal, Remix, SolidStart, QwickCity, and Sveltekit is missing... The No.1 framework is not getting attention from Max, very interesting 😅

    • @IainSimmons
      @IainSimmons Рік тому +1

      @@maskman4821 that's not even close to naming all the meta-frameworks. And with tools like vite-plugin-ssr, you could write your own fairly easily.
      If someone has love for another framework/meta-framework, by all means, give it a shoutout, but no reason to criticise this excellent video because something else didn't get a mention (not directed at you on particular)

  • @alexzav1327
    @alexzav1327 Рік тому

    Thank you for the video! So are we moving to the fact that web developers should know and use both frontend and backend?

  • @jelenatrifkovic5567
    @jelenatrifkovic5567 Рік тому

    Interesting video!

  • @sabuein
    @sabuein Рік тому

    Thank you.

  • @jensadria
    @jensadria Рік тому

    We are also in the next evolution of Max's UA-cam production value

  • @GuiltyJit
    @GuiltyJit Рік тому

    Lets keep going

  • @CharithaSampathGunawardana
    @CharithaSampathGunawardana Рік тому +1

    Could you please make a separate video on AnalogJs please 🥰

  • @Anbu_Sampath
    @Anbu_Sampath 8 місяців тому

    This kinda completes the cycle. But with new tools and modelling it's always interesting to work.

  • @tommyjado127
    @tommyjado127 Рік тому

    great video

  • @jma42
    @jma42 Рік тому

    now we are going to populate new frameworks in the backend!

  • @jkuang
    @jkuang Рік тому +4

    Java developer here. I am comfortable with C/C++/C#/Java. But when I look at JavaScript, I feel like someone was drunk when they came up with JavaScript. I can not wrap around myself with JavaScript. I am not trying to be little JavaScript developers. It is just the way I feel.
    With so much efforts invested in JavaScript, why can't the browser lords just agree to use strong type and OOP C++/Java/C# to drive everything in browsers. You don't have to stay with a scripting language like JavaScript forever. So much energy is piling up JavaScript ... so much ...

    • @leepeter6626
      @leepeter6626 Рік тому

      If you prefer C#, you may consider Blazor, which make the SPA development much easier for the developers who familiar .NET tech stack.

    • @fintechtelugu6980
      @fintechtelugu6980 Рік тому

      They are using Typescript

  • @ivanbarta2821
    @ivanbarta2821 Рік тому +10

    I supose Svelte and Sveltekit are missing from the list because they are so good that this is the future?

    • @academind
      @academind  Рік тому +4

      It’s not a list. The goal was not to squeeze as many names as possible into the video. It’s a video with some general thoughts about the landscape - which obviously includes svelte

    • @SilvestreVivo
      @SilvestreVivo Рік тому +4

      @@academind Difficult to understand you mentions Solid and not SvelteKit.

    • @ivanbarta2821
      @ivanbarta2821 Рік тому

      @@academind I understand that video format is not a list, but this word is quite useful when you want to emphasize that something is missing.
      Otherwise, your content is great 😉👍

  • @ikedacripps
    @ikedacripps Рік тому

    Max please can you update your nextjs course. Thank you sir.

  • @JoshDeveloper
    @JoshDeveloper Рік тому

    @academind Can you do a separate video for AnalogJS ?

  • @BewareOfStinger
    @BewareOfStinger Рік тому +1

    I wonder about Django and specifically Django Templates for front-ends. Is it even a thing nowadays or are the JS frameworks the way to go?

  • @0zema
    @0zema Рік тому +14

    odd you didn't mention Svelte and Sveltekit

    • @nivethan_me
      @nivethan_me Рік тому +1

      Svelte out of beta not even for 2 months! why compare it to a Frameworks like React and Angular which is in the game for around 10 years. can Svelte stay same for the next 10 years without breaking anything? if then, it will be outdated, or if they introduce new features or architecture then it will break things and the Developer Experience aspect will be gone!

    • @SilvestreVivo
      @SilvestreVivo Рік тому +1

      @@nivethan_me Svelte is 3 years old.

    • @nivethan_me
      @nivethan_me Рік тому

      @@SilvestreVivo read my comments again, it doesn't matter when it started, its just 2 month old

    • @SilvestreVivo
      @SilvestreVivo Рік тому +4

      @@nivethan_me svelte is 3 years old.

    • @ivanbarta2821
      @ivanbarta2821 Рік тому +1

      @@nivethan_me 🤦‍♂

  • @istagest6072
    @istagest6072 Рік тому

    I agree

  • @saintpumpkin
    @saintpumpkin Рік тому

    Never ended to use Php and it payed off

  • @SlackyMr
    @SlackyMr Рік тому +4

    I personally prefer Net Core , view components and ajax. Strange combo, but gets the job done nicely imho with easy structure/models and api. But again I am weird ....

  • @TheVentureaaron
    @TheVentureaaron Рік тому

    Thanks for putting this together. It's helpful for a guy who has been primarily backend development and needing to move to modern stack dev. Great overview!

  • @MightyKingKala
    @MightyKingKala Рік тому

    thanks for the video, what do you think about laravel?

  • @V7979
    @V7979 Рік тому

    You are very amazing

  • @brillrayel1103
    @brillrayel1103 Рік тому

    Yes. I agree with where Javascript is going.

  • @hansschenker
    @hansschenker Рік тому

    Is Node Express framework not an alterntive to these upcoming meta frameworks?

  • @DesignfulDev
    @DesignfulDev Рік тому +5

    What is your thoughts on the Qwik framework? From what I've seen so far, it is quite a paradigm shift from other frameworks.

    • @MrEnsiferum77
      @MrEnsiferum77 Рік тому +1

      Astro can do similar thing, with providers, but at the end everything is new and better paradigm, until, the project gets messy.

    • @coherentpanda7115
      @coherentpanda7115 Рік тому +2

      Astro Qwik and all of the other island architecture frameworks are interesting, but I think the jury is still out any will take off or it's just a passing fad. Personally, I can't let go of NextJS 13 until I see some convincing reasons to drop it. SolidStart is the only newer framework that I have interest in.

    • @MrEnsiferum77
      @MrEnsiferum77 Рік тому

      @@coherentpanda7115 Looks like crap about to fail, i don't see what brings to the table, qwik i astro really push forward FE frameworks...

  • @gkiokan
    @gkiokan Рік тому

    I would say, never change a running system. I am stuck with my Laravel Vue application combo and I can do build any kind of application with it, compared with a overall framework like quasar or build by your own wrapper this can be adapted as an Desktop Application, Hybrid Smartphone App or even a super dynamic Website. Don't change to much of you will never have time to do some productive work at all. My PS4 Package Sender v2 is a great example for this and not only it's one of the best of it's kind, it just works perfectly.

  • @jaizon
    @jaizon Рік тому +1

    What's your take on Svelte + Svelte Kit?

  • @abuzain859
    @abuzain859 Рік тому +2

    brother thaks you a lot because of you react js coursing i got job in a software company love form pakistan

  • @greggreenhaw
    @greggreenhaw Рік тому

    I've been coding JS for 20 years and love knockout. The biggest plus is the mindset where the js knows nothing about the html. The HTML binds itself to the JS. Knockout is more of a utility, but the mvvc mindset is the the most important part.

    • @kishirisu1268
      @kishirisu1268 10 місяців тому

      MVVC - looks like you still in 2000s

  • @unboxkarunadu372
    @unboxkarunadu372 Рік тому

    MAX will do course on sveltekit and then he will add it in the list. Until no word about svelte or sveltekit

  • @PutlerXLO
    @PutlerXLO Рік тому

    And there is still no built-in package manager in browsers with cloud storage so that all sites use the same sources for libraries, and do not load everything in own bundles or from different cdns.

  • @deadlyprogrammer6780
    @deadlyprogrammer6780 Рік тому

    Could you please update VueJS course to use Vite, Pinia and Volar

  • @BrunoCodeman
    @BrunoCodeman Рік тому +4

    We started with backend rendered pages and now more than a decade later we're on the same point again. We should stop following big tech decisions and start being real with the problems we have, not them.

  • @ritikraj.18
    @ritikraj.18 Рік тому +3

    What about web assembly

  • @matilha2020
    @matilha2020 Рік тому

    Thanks man, its like having an European Seth Rogen explaining me this.

  • @LovingLego
    @LovingLego Рік тому

    JavaScript Universe (JSU) Phase 7 it began

  • @SonnyParlin
    @SonnyParlin Рік тому

    What JavaScript framework would you recommend for a project that needs to be highly stable over a two-year period of inactivity? Ideally, it should require minimal to no updates for the framework itself and its dependencies during this time. Is there any particular framework known for its long-term support and stability? lol

  • @mitvasani7274
    @mitvasani7274 Рік тому

    I see Maximillian also reads and listens to Swyx.

  • @HeyDan1983
    @HeyDan1983 Рік тому

    Why you didnt mention svelte?

  • @maskman4821
    @maskman4821 Рік тому +16

    I have been building apps with meta frameworks such as Sveltekit, Next, Nuxt these days, I havent tried SolidStart, QwikCity and Remix yet, but I found out Sveltekit provides the best DX and overall the best SSR, with Next we cant write client side javascript in server component, but with Sveltekit we dont have such issue because different architecture, Nuxt is cool too but I personally think Sveltekit is the best meta framework and it is a master piece from Rich Harris which is a reality you have to face, just give it a try and you will definitely fall in love with Sveltekit, the no.1 meta framework 💪💪💪

    • @universe_decoded797
      @universe_decoded797 Рік тому +3

      I tried nextjs nuxt3 sveltekit and solidstart and i really like sveltekit.
      The DX, ssr and reactivity is amazing.
      I think solidstart is very promising but there’s alot of work to do for the DX.
      You should try it out if you like react. It doesn’t use a virtual dom. Instead you subscribe to certain states.

    • @nivethan_me
      @nivethan_me Рік тому +2

      the actually reality facing part is you have much better chance of getting a job with React or Angular than Sveltekit,
      a new framework can do lots of things without thinking about breaking changes(compatibility) but React, Angular, Vue are in the game for a long time. we can only see how Sveltekit gonna handle that after some time

    • @arvi8843
      @arvi8843 Рік тому +1

      If looking for a job there are tons for React and none I see is hiring "svelte" developers. It's not there yet and most companies have already built on React / Angular / Vue.
      Only chance for svelte are super startups and hobby projects for now. Give it a year or two. 😆

    • @maskman4821
      @maskman4821 Рік тому +3

      @@nivethan_me @Nivethan Dude, we are not talking about job opportunities, we are talking about meta frameworks, Sveltekit is No.1 but not even mentioned among seven existed competitors and that confused many people you know 🤔

    • @aquaductape
      @aquaductape Рік тому

      SolidStart is still in beta, but it will be sick once it passes 1.0

  • @ore_bear8045
    @ore_bear8045 Рік тому

    I work in phase 2 still 😄

  • @Jason-kx2js
    @Jason-kx2js Рік тому +1

    would love to see a solidjs course this year

  • @ethanlal4517
    @ethanlal4517 8 місяців тому +1

    Can't believe he didn't mention Svelte.

  • @fortunembulazi
    @fortunembulazi Рік тому +1

    You didn't talk about Qwik which I'm much more interested in, I'm planning to build my next app with it.

    • @JBuchmann
      @JBuchmann Рік тому

      He focused on the "big 3" frameworks, which ate the most important for getting a job at the moment

  • @ley3748
    @ley3748 Рік тому +1

    I hope you will create a next13 tutorial

  • @saidibra9231
    @saidibra9231 Рік тому +1

    express.js is used more than next.js in back-end development

  • @Alcaatraz01
    @Alcaatraz01 Рік тому +2

    This is the first I've heard of Analogjs lol. It's very interesting because the recent livestreams from the Angular team have had the creator of Analogjs (Brandon), and other angular team members, talking about the work they will put into ngUniversal to adopt the metaframework features. That seems to contradict the work that Brandon is doing on his own. Very interesting situation. My suspicion is that he was working on it since last year and it wasn't until more recently that the angular team decided internally to add these features to the monolithic angular way as opposed to metaframework approach.

    • @TayambaMwanza
      @TayambaMwanza Рік тому

      Angular will not support vite but custom esbuild, I think analog will be more lightweight but as a result will be able to adopt new technology without waiting for Angular team, analog just uses vite, also has file-based routing.

  • @RobinPayot
    @RobinPayot Рік тому +1

    What about Svelte?

  • @maid768
    @maid768 Рік тому +1

    What is the difference between Analog.js and Angular Universal? I thought Angular Universal is like next.js for react?

    • @brahmharsh24
      @brahmharsh24 Рік тому

      Yes, Universal for SSR (Server Side Rendering)

    • @maid768
      @maid768 Рік тому

      @@brahmharsh24 but what is the difference between Analog.js and Angular Universal?

  • @h.hristov
    @h.hristov Рік тому

    Next phase is emscripten and webassembly

  • @GeneraluStelaru
    @GeneraluStelaru Рік тому +5

    Wouldn't this direction make PHP gain relevance again? I've recently explored Symfony 6 and I was surprised of how close the dev experience is to a node-based framework but then the 'modules' are much easier to obtain and use. I feel like it has gone under the radar while everybody was looking solely to JS, but I bet any JS framework fan would get second thoughts if they tried sf.

    • @maelstrom-qw1jl
      @maelstrom-qw1jl Рік тому +1

      Symfony is the complete and utter opposite of anything NodeJS: super opinionated, bulky, slow to develop in and a pretty-looking tool aimed mostly at impressing clueless clients.

    • @nordicnomad5473
      @nordicnomad5473 Рік тому +2

      Check Laravel too

    • @GeneraluStelaru
      @GeneraluStelaru Рік тому

      @@nordicnomad5473 Will do.

  • @daviidon
    @daviidon Рік тому +8

    Weird that you didn't mention svelte which compiles your code to js so you don't ship a framework to the browser.
    Or qwik with it's innovative resumable feature which gets rid of hydration.

    • @PhilipAlexanderHassialis
      @PhilipAlexanderHassialis Рік тому

      Qwik and Astro should have been mentioned, but the "compiled" frameworks were covered as an aspect with the inclusion of Solid (basically what Svelte does for "Vue-ish" code, Solid does for React)

    • @Mateking92
      @Mateking92 Рік тому

      You only ship JS with Angular too.

  • @webentwinkler
    @webentwinkler Рік тому +1

    So basically, we are moving more and more towards what Rich Harris coined as "Transitional Apps" in this great talk right here: ua-cam.com/video/860d8usGC0o/v-deo.html
    I'd actually like it if that term would become the official name in the long run, it is very fitting. Maybe you could help that along Max, by adopting the term to use wherever it fits.
    And speaking of Rich Harris: I also hope that you will announce a new course about SvelteKit soon, it certainly deserved one. Or, even better, update your Udemy Svelte course and replace the whole part that covers Sapper (which is basically officially dead now) with SvelteKit lessons instead. I would certainly pay for such an extensive update.

  • @bluecafe509
    @bluecafe509 Рік тому +2

    Honestly, this video sums up the problem with JavaScript and why the Vanilla.js website is so important. You forgot to mention that we also got evergreen browsers in this time and better native apis. ... But the video makes sense if you make all your money selling courses for JavaScript frameworks.

    • @aquaductape
      @aquaductape Рік тому

      Even when you use "vanilla" js, eventually when your app grows, you will create templates, wrappers and utilities for readability, composition and consistency. Essentially you created your own framework that only you understand

    • @bluecafe509
      @bluecafe509 Рік тому

      @@aquaductape There are standards, patterns, and conventions you can follow. So "no" to what you said.

  • @myztazynizta
    @myztazynizta Рік тому

    For someone who started out with free or dirt cheap shared php hosting and hasn't touched web code in 10 years, what is the simplest and CHEAPEST way to do server side JS today?

  • @jasonpmcneill
    @jasonpmcneill Рік тому

    I love the wall art in the background: !FALSE -- It's funny because it's true 🤣

  • @thanapolraktham2291
    @thanapolraktham2291 Рік тому

    Teacher Max apparently and definitely is a fan of React.

  • @kishannr911
    @kishannr911 Рік тому

    I am watching about JavaScript in a Web application build on JS...

  • @tariqal-malki8401
    @tariqal-malki8401 Рік тому +1

    I bought 8 courses over the years from your courses max, and I will continue to buy more because you are an awesome instructor!!!
    I hope you do an extensive course on GraphQL.
    and I'm asking one more thing if you could give me your python course 2023 for free, I would really appreciate it.
    I looked up for a python course in Udemy, I even searched in your account in Udemy for python course, and I didn't find it, then I proceeded to buy python course from another instructor, I tried to request a refund so I can buy your python course, and they didn't refused to do so, little I know that there is another account for you, there I found python course 2023, but I'm short on money 😣.
    thank you for this video 🌹

  • @dominicroybal3885
    @dominicroybal3885 Рік тому

    What is django considered?

  • @jonasvm
    @jonasvm 11 місяців тому

    so what's the deal with node.js?

  • @MarcosVMSoares
    @MarcosVMSoares Рік тому

    Phoenix Live View ?

  • @yourivanmill
    @yourivanmill Рік тому

    Vue is introduced in 2014

  • @oswaldoolea2889
    @oswaldoolea2889 Рік тому

    What about svelte?

  • @xxwaldi
    @xxwaldi 11 місяців тому

    Hot take: All these frameworks move to backend because they can provide server infrastructure for hosting (e.g. Vercel) which they charge a shit ton of money for.

  • @devesh21
    @devesh21 Рік тому

    👍

  • @Alex-bc3xe
    @Alex-bc3xe Рік тому +1

    A lesson I learned, you need to make money so you are not dependent on something you can't control.

  • @Annaatti
    @Annaatti Рік тому

    What about dotNET world??

  • @NicolasSilvaVasault
    @NicolasSilvaVasault Рік тому

    i'm not into svelte right now, but i think is the future, is probably the most disruptive framework i've seen in several years or even a decade

  • @gggiiia147
    @gggiiia147 Рік тому

    next phase, Typescript everything

  • @abhijeetmeshram3762
    @abhijeetmeshram3762 Рік тому

    Next phase will be back to vanilla js
    Later JS adopt all required features into the core.
    Similar we will no longer required any CSS preprocessors

  • @xxXAsuraXxx
    @xxXAsuraXxx Рік тому +4

    I think React is coming to an end, might be deprecated soon