These 4 ACC schools could be REALLY entertained by SEC expansion | The Matt Barrie Show

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 жов 2024
  • On The Matt Barrie Show, Paul Finebaum and Matt Barrie react to teams in the ACC who would be entertained by SEC expansion.
    #ESPN #CFB #espn #MattBarrie #Finebaum #TheMattBarrieShow #Podcast
    ✔️Subscribe to ESPN+ espnplus.com/yo...
    ✔️ Get the ESPN App: www.espn.com/es...
    ✔️Subscribe to ESPN on UA-cam: es.pn/SUBSCRIBE...
    ✔️ Subscribe to NBA on ESPN on UA-cam: bit.ly/SUBSCRIB...
    ✔️ Watch ESPN on UA-cam TV: es.pn/UA-camTV

КОМЕНТАРІ • 303

  • @McGrady412
    @McGrady412 Рік тому +45

    "Miami is a football power." 🤣 The word you're looking for here is "was," "was a football power."

    • @trclark7689
      @trclark7689 11 місяців тому +1

      facts.

    • @JohnDry
      @JohnDry 11 місяців тому +1

      Clemson, Texas, and Oklahoma was a power house as well. They ain't no more.

    • @RoscoPColtrane17
      @RoscoPColtrane17 10 місяців тому +1

      Texas? Aren’t they on the cusp of the playoffs?

    • @Patrick-sg7cm
      @Patrick-sg7cm 9 місяців тому

      Larry Coker had Miami operating at a high level.

    • @McGrady412
      @McGrady412 9 місяців тому +2

      @@Patrick-sg7cm From the 30 for 30, that was Butch Davis's team, who practiced without needing coaches to facilitate. Larry Coker was just a figurehead on those two early teams of his. Notice the further into his coaching tenure at Miami, how fewer the successes Miami had since he took the job. He couldn't replicate Butch Davis's coaching or recruiting.

  • @lazyakers
    @lazyakers Рік тому +32

    It took Texas and OU a combined 100 million dollars to leave the Big 12 *one* year early. ACC schools who want to leave now would be leaving 12 years early. Their exit fees are going to be way higher than Texas and OU’s.

    • @trevorhoneycutt8718
      @trevorhoneycutt8718 Рік тому +4

      Not necessarily! Because the acc schools only make 17 million per team from the tv deal , and that’s less than half of the sec and some other conferences. If I was a betting man I would bet since they make less in the acc tv deal, the big out is probably a lot cheaper . I could be wrong tho , I’m sure all the numbers can be found online

    • @volbound1700
      @volbound1700 Рік тому +5

      You are right. Although on a yearly basis, the buy-out isn't as bad as OU and Texas, the fact that they are leaving 10 years early (not 12) would make overall buy-out a lot larger than OU and Texas.

    • @lazyakers
      @lazyakers Рік тому

      @@trevorhoneycutt8718 again, they have *12 years* left on the contract. Then they would have to buy back their media rights on top of the exit fees.

    • @lazyakers
      @lazyakers Рік тому +1

      @@volbound1700 they’re contract is up after the 2035-2036 school year. If they want to be in another league in 2024, that means they’re leaving twelve seasons early (2024-2035 seasons)

    • @sarahmccoy1941
      @sarahmccoy1941 Рік тому

      @@lazyakers You obviously understand math. 😂

  • @eyesofthefox
    @eyesofthefox Рік тому +34

    As a Dawg fan, I would accept Clemson, GT, FLST and The U. The rivalry potential would do big numbers since it would have bigger conference implications.

    • @jumapelljohn3958
      @jumapelljohn3958 Рік тому +1

      I agree. Clemson and Georgia should play every year again like they use to.

    • @jayjohnson7646
      @jayjohnson7646 Рік тому +4

      ​@@chandler2miami is not on the south???? Dude shut up lol they are the most souther city in the US. Stop it. Miami gets the eyes to watch stop the hate on miami. The best brands to come out of the ACC are clemson, fsu, Miami, and either VT or UNC. Those are the programs that have actually won or shared a natty. Unc came very close at one point. And have put out some nfl talent in the league.

    • @battles423
      @battles423 Рік тому +2

      Nobody wants GT 😂

    • @JohnnyJackson746
      @JohnnyJackson746 Рік тому

      Miami hates the sec. Paul finebaum said some terrible stuff about them. Big 10 is where it's at.

    • @mj6493
      @mj6493 9 місяців тому +1

      @@battles423 My problem with the current realignment is that the fortunes of college football programs rise and fall regularly. Clemson, recently invincible, is now having a tough year. GT has won a natty in my lifetime. Kirby Smart lost to Vanderbilt in his first season at UGA. Things change. Who knew that Missouri would have such a good year? What will happen to Michigan if Harbaugh goes to the pros? Just trying to grab the best teams at a particular point in time without regard to historic rivalries and regional passions seems short sighted.

  • @Alan.Endicott
    @Alan.Endicott Рік тому +13

    ESPN is cheerleading a move of ACC to SEC because they don't lose anything. Even Paul had to admit the B1G was a factor, but ESPN doesn't have those TV rights.

    • @MercerKnowsBall
      @MercerKnowsBall Рік тому

      You have NO IDEA what you are talking about
      Thankfully ESPN is not that DUMB
      Try thinking about what you are saying.
      If ESPN moves schools out of the SEC and into the ACC that OPENS UP the ACC to be raided by the BIG... so CLEARLY that move means ESPN LOSES some portion of the ACC... that is SOMETHING to lose not NOTHING.
      ESPN makes MORE MONEY off of the ACC than they do off of the SEC because they are PARTNERS in the ACC Network which they have invested a combined $3.84 BILLION in building... money that would be LOST... that is SOMETHING not NOTHING
      Not to mention that the SCHOOLS in the ACC that would leave will StILL OWE the schools they leave behind 13 years of payments for EVERY PENNY they earn from TV in that time. It is NOT money that ESPN would owe ITSELF as some people think.
      These schools would earn NOTHING from TV Games for 13 years.
      Having the ACC broken up is a LOSE LOSE scenario for ESPN
      All ESPN has to do to keep BOTH the ACC and SEC INTACT is INCREASE ACC Revenue and after this year ESPN will free up AND USE $16 Million per ACC school to do just that.
      ESPN will also get everything they have been spending on the PAC and BIG available to FIX the ACC permanently. They will EXPAND the ACC with the best available Brands and Markets to FIX IT and PAY the ACC its NEW VALUE.
      10 years from now ESPN could move some ACC schools to the SEC if it wanted to. But not now.
      And even then it will be smarter to RAID the best of the XII again to add more content under the ESPN Banner

  • @brianbabyak6494
    @brianbabyak6494 Рік тому +7

    This seems like a couple guys trying to will some ACC teams into the SEC as opposed to the B1G.

  • @RoadTo19
    @RoadTo19 Рік тому +11

    Keep in mind these conversations are only taking football programs into consideration. Several of those teams are basketball schools.

    • @richardstephens5570
      @richardstephens5570 Рік тому +4

      Yes, but football is where the money is. North Carolina and Duke's football teams make more money than their basketball teams.

    • @RoadTo19
      @RoadTo19 Рік тому

      @@richardstephens5570 I would suggest those are still basketball schools.
      Without knowledge of the facts, I presume the larger football stadiums with more seats is the reason for higher revenue.

    • @bobzelley5100
      @bobzelley5100 Рік тому +1

      ​@richardstephens5570 I think of the two as basketball schools and not a big 10 type , farmers' college

    • @andrewfanfan
      @andrewfanfan 2 місяці тому

      @@richardstephens5570really?

  • @michaelmier9512
    @michaelmier9512 25 днів тому

    Sixteen teams in the SEC is plenty, thank you. That's a perfect number for analyzing, comparing & ranking a conference of college football teams.

  • @rickstclair2217
    @rickstclair2217 8 місяців тому +3

    the sec is too big now, do not need more schools.

  • @petewilcox3354
    @petewilcox3354 Рік тому +6

    $EC looking fairly mortal this year. Georgia beating up mostly nobodies, with the exception of a rebuilding Auburn.

    • @garlandalmarode6396
      @garlandalmarode6396 9 місяців тому +1

      They aren't going to say it, but Nil is hurting the Sec, the Acc did well against them this year and Nil is helping teams like Miami and VT come back. There was nothing special about the Sec this year and that includes Alabama and Georgia. It looks to me the Sec has maybe seen their hayday. TX and OU coming in will help, but the traditional Sec teams are hurting. The Acc is recruiting really well inspite of what they say. They are landing portal players. Teams like Bama will not be able to stock pile as many as other schools pull players from them. Their talent level is already diminished. They would have had more losses in the Acc this year. Fsu is making a really bad decision, because they are hurting financially because they are paying HC they fired plus the present regime. That's my opinion.

    • @petewilcox3354
      @petewilcox3354 9 місяців тому +1

      @@garlandalmarode6396 I agree, and have said that I feel like it is helping the non blue bloods entice highly rated 2nd stringers to make the move, and start elsewhere. In fact I have seen it happen quite a bit last year and this year.

  • @pfpvilano
    @pfpvilano Рік тому +15

    The SEC is not going to add another Florida or South Carolina team anytime soon. Expansion into North Carolina and Virginia make the most sense. It's not about the football program per se. It's about revenue generation.

    • @BB-uu9oo
      @BB-uu9oo Рік тому +12

      That used to be the case, but you see how the SEC added another TX school. Don't be surprised if the SEC adds Clemson, FSU, UNC/NC St, and UVA/VA Tech

    • @pfpvilano
      @pfpvilano Рік тому +2

      @BB-uu9oo that's a true point, however it was the grand prize - Texas. FSU and Clemson don't have nearly that size and gravitas. SEC took Texas A&M so they could one day make the case to take Texas.

    • @jayjohnson7646
      @jayjohnson7646 Рік тому

      ​@@pfpvilanohell naw you bugging out. They took ou and Texas because it was easier and OU is a football on the field winner and bug brand. Texas right now is just a huge brand. Clemson has both as you can see. We are recruiting and getting great players from the state of Texas. And Texas recruiting classes have been behind clemson too for a while. Plus clemson has played the SEC more times than any other school outside of the conference. UGA and clemson used to play every year. Oof conference games set up with Florida in the coming years. Played auburn several times last decade or so. And SC every year. So cut it out.

    • @williambush406
      @williambush406 Рік тому

      They would go to the b10 because of academics but on point they don’t need fsu or Clemson

    • @GymRat4Life01
      @GymRat4Life01 Рік тому +2

      I think the SEC will be at a disadvantage with both UNC & Virginia when it comes to competing with the Big Ten in terms of expansion. Both of those schools are in the AAU (Association of American Universities) and are highly ranked academically like all the BigTen schools (including the 4 new PAC12 programs joining) that are also in the AAU. UNC is ranked #29 & Virginia is ranked #25 in academics nationally. Their leadership will see themselves as a much better fit with Big Ten as academics is a big thing for both and the university Presidents there will lean that way. It's going to have to be a lot more than a few million dollars to get them to lean in the SEC direction if the Big Ten opens its door.

  • @marlonnicholson8410
    @marlonnicholson8410 Рік тому +9

    Creating the ACC network was all about ESPN being greedy controlling a conference so another network wouldn't get a piece and now a deal into the 2030s looks a little bad

    • @willcartoons
      @willcartoons Рік тому +3

      I agree. Especially with the possibility of Disney selling off ESPN. Makes it all more complicated should that happen.

  • @a.barker7792
    @a.barker7792 Рік тому +3

    Who is up for buying ESPN?
    Saudi Arabia thats who.
    They need a media platform. And they can start a Fox like news program.

  • @richardmontjoy5881
    @richardmontjoy5881 Рік тому +4

    The conferences that are going cross country now need to rebrand themselves with a new name.

    • @blown22
      @blown22 7 місяців тому

      ACC now = ALL Coast Conference

  • @marcus7058
    @marcus7058 9 місяців тому +2

    I feel espn wants to destroy conferences that have nothing to do with espn. If the ACC had a deal with the SEC like espn does they would not comment or go to indef. But espn pretty much “talked” the sec in the cfp they wanted everyone to except the bs FSU should have been in.

  • @davidb3422
    @davidb3422 8 місяців тому +1

    Except given a choice, all 4 of those schools would rather join the B1G. SEC is just a football factory and some universities care about academics.

  • @dfausti66
    @dfausti66 7 місяців тому +1

    The move by the SEC and the Big 10 will inevitably fail. Why? Because there is currently a $1,5 trillion student loan crisis looming and it is closing down academic institutions. Besides, what is to stop the fans of the Big 12, the ACC, and the G6 conferences from going to Congress and asking them to take control of all college athletics (including football) in order to pay into the student loan crisis. Do you really think Americans are going to prefer paying for the student loan crisis with their taxes when it could come out of the media rights deals? Fans are not likely going to tolerate an increase in taxes when basic needs like food, fuel, healthcare, and other such needs are on the rise along with business failures and unemployment trends.

  • @StreakingTiger
    @StreakingTiger Рік тому +4

    I'm still trying to understand why ESPN thinks the Big 10 is a super-conference. Clemson beat their best repeatedly, and only lost due to Clemson's OC not being there due to Covid. Do you clowns at ESPN even watch football? You do nothing but try and promote your agenda for the SEC. Destroying the ACC means that nobody beats your best teams in the SEC anymore. The ACC has the only teams that ever beat SEC teams (well, except UGA getting stomped when the ESPN wanted them in the playoff but good sense prevented it).

    • @garlandalmarode6396
      @garlandalmarode6396 9 місяців тому +3

      The Sec and Big 10 are made for TV production. Neither as good as portrayed while the Acc isn't as bad as portrayed. It's smoke and mirrors for the espn clowns. Bama and Georgia dominate the Sec then they want to tell us how good the teams are they beat every year. They are very mediocre is what they are.

  • @Patriot_Pete
    @Patriot_Pete Рік тому +14

    No Way. The SEC has enough Schools with Texas and Oklahoma joining next year. No more Expansion is Needed

    • @florida1289
      @florida1289 Рік тому

      You're correct. Plus it would almost zero value to the conference as that footprint has been plowed.
      Now, if the B10 were to land anyone on the southern east coast that would make sense
      It's all about $$$

    • @nft4751
      @nft4751 Рік тому +3

      All 133 FBS college football teams should just go into the SEC in my opinion

    • @LifewithLucy.2019
      @LifewithLucy.2019 Рік тому +2

      They are both in the west. Florida State and Clemson could join the East and have 9 schools per East/West areas.

    • @MercerKnowsBall
      @MercerKnowsBall Рік тому

      @@LifewithLucy.2019 HELLO. Divisions are GONE. They don't EXIST anymore

    • @jumapelljohn3958
      @jumapelljohn3958 Рік тому

      No way the SEC can't counter the B10 move with Oregon and Washington and Clemson and FSU bring the most eyeballs and TV viewership. They also have the most SEC like fan bases and stadiums along with they have been very competitive against SEC competition.

  • @roberthuxen3461
    @roberthuxen3461 Рік тому +3

    In what universe would the SEC ask OLE MISS and Mississippi State to leave the SEC!!!

    • @acemulligan7010
      @acemulligan7010 Рік тому

      In Mike Bianchi's world. FYI, he is an A-hole columnist for the Orlando Sentinel that wrote a column in 2014 saying the SEC replace Ole Miss and Miss State with UCF and USF. That season, Miss State went to the Orange Bowl, and Ole Miss to the Peach Bowl.

  • @lafan4801
    @lafan4801 Рік тому +2

    You guys know so little about the acc . UNC has architected the acc since the getgo. The original members from 1953 are the main cabal. Why do you think Maryland bailed? This was originally done over basketball but now that college BB has cratered, so the football schools are bailing …

    • @tarheel7406
      @tarheel7406 Рік тому

      MD bailed because its Athletic Dept was broke.

  • @rudeearl
    @rudeearl Рік тому +8

    With Disney teetering on major financial troubles and looking to sell intellectual properties, I could imagine them selling off their ACC rights to an Amazon or Apple while keeping the SEC. If this happened AND if I were the ACC commissioner, I’d try my hardest to convince Notre Dame to join full time and get Penn State, Maryland, and West Virginia to leave their respective conferences and renegotiate a new contract that is on par with the SEC and Big 10. Keeping the current ACC in tact while adding those teams would make a spectacular conference. I know, it’s a reach but a bold move and it’s the only way I see the ACC surviving as a conference.
    If this doesn’t work, and we’re going to “super conferences” anyway, ESPN and the SEC should do a partial merger with the ACC and the poach the eight best teams to: 1) make it easier for the ACC to insure they get the required 8 teams to vote to dissolve the conference to get out of the grant of rights. 2) lock up any new TV markets the SEC isn’t already in and block the Big 10 from infiltrating into tho fertile recruiting areas. 3) insure that the SEC maintains the absolute best teams or “product” to put on TV and increase revenue.
    Adding 8 ACC teams get the SEC super conference to a neat and tidy 24 teams. This is what the Big 10 is shooting for and they’re doing coast to coast.

    • @hummushero9428
      @hummushero9428 Рік тому +1

      Both sound like good ideas, and good for the sport on the first one. However, neither is probably realistic. the first idea requires teams to break GORs that as we know carry huge buyouts, and no B1G school is leaving, it’s the best academic fellowship and it makes the most money that won’t change, just to many eyeballs on the existing teams in the B1G.
      The second idea seems logical, but it’s probably not realistic legally. The choice teams that Disney would want to move would all have to agree simultaneously to go to together while voiding the GOR with a majority, some teams wouldn’t go for it fearing a worse outcome like what is happening to Wazzu, Oregon state, and Cal Berkeley. and some would choose to go to the B1G almost certainly anyway. Just because Disney owns the rights to both conferences doesn’t give them legal grounds to forcibly move teams from one to another, the moment they allow anyone to move legal grounds are established for any team to choose where they go.
      It’s basically a catch 22 for Disney and The ACC as a conference in general. Do nothing and watch your programs fall behind financially. Allow renegotiation (unlikely even hypothetically because Disney likes the price
      , it’s bargain bin) and once again legal grounds to leave are established. FSU, Clemson and UNC might pony up the Exit fee know if they could recoup the loss as sure fire additions two either big revenue conference. or wait it out and be able to survive as legitimate programs because of the overall prestige and backing independent of TV revenue, but basically everyone else will die a slow death and as this becomes apparent after so many years. eventually the necessary votes will be there to abolish the GOR, sure BC and Wake might not ever do it because they are basically G5 level programs, but even Louisville and Syracuse and Pitt eventually will, as they know the B12 would likely take them. We will see how it all shakes out.

    • @NomadVideoProductions
      @NomadVideoProductions Рік тому +2

      I doubt Notre Dame would join the ACC though that would definitely be the best move forward. There is no feasible way the ACC gets ANY of those schools to leave their conference. The Big 12 has a lot of hype and better competition and the Big 10 is making WAY more money than ACC so there's no way they consider moving to the ACC. It would be great for ACC, but impossible.

    • @georgemadison3466
      @georgemadison3466 Рік тому

      Amazon now.

    • @tarheel7406
      @tarheel7406 Рік тому

      I suspect that the ACC's deal requires linear exposure, and Amazon/Apple can't provide that.

    • @trclark7689
      @trclark7689 11 місяців тому

      Why would Penn State and Maryland leave the B1G and their $100 million dollar a year deal to join a pitiful conference that's falling apart? Maryland left for a reason and Clemson and FSU should have done the same.

  • @guttarich10
    @guttarich10 Рік тому +21

    Clemson would be crazy in the SEC. Their recruiting would only get stronger.

    • @tnole99
      @tnole99 Рік тому +10

      FSU would be even better. That brand sells itself and will only get stronger with more resources. Look how good they are doing in recruiting right now without a championship in 10 seasons.

    • @jayjohnson7646
      @jayjohnson7646 Рік тому +1

      ​@@tnole99naw clemson would he better and half of the recruits on your fsu is from the transfer portal. Stop it clemson performs better and will do better. We already getting the better recruits out of Florida for a decade now. And I would almost wager and say miami will he a major player in the SEC too

    • @samsnyder4433
      @samsnyder4433 Рік тому +9

      Clemson sadly would be a mid tier team in the SEC

    • @lifeislikeaboxofchocolates5383
      @lifeislikeaboxofchocolates5383 Рік тому +4

      Clemson wouldn't do shi in the sec but I woudlnt mind them coming 😭

    • @mj6493
      @mj6493 Рік тому +7

      @@samsnyder4433 That's what a lot of Alabama fans said in 2018. How'd that season turn out? That's right, Alabama got throttled by Clemson in the Natty.

  • @joe_zeay
    @joe_zeay 11 місяців тому +1

    SEC TRYING TO DESTROY COLLEGE FOOTBALL AGAIN
    BOYCOTT ESPN

  • @arby163
    @arby163 7 місяців тому +1

    ACC schools can't recruit that is why Miami had the #7 and #4 classes the last 2 years.

  • @sochowell3469
    @sochowell3469 3 місяці тому

    This show started with a disclaimer, that Barrie knows nothing about ACC teams' realignment future. Partially true, but Barrie and Finebaum know more than most. . Finebaum essentially states four ACC teams are relevant. The sands are shifting. The SEC may want in on 2, 3, or 4 ACC teams, or this ESPN produced show is not aired.

  • @RiVer-Parish
    @RiVer-Parish Рік тому +10

    Florida State,Miami, Virginia Tech, and North Carolina are gone.

    • @Guthbox
      @Guthbox Рік тому +2

      Big12 will have a spot for Miami. Could also be the B1G’s plan B if they don’t get FSU.
      Mentioning the latter 3 before Clemson is odd

    • @aclayhosuton
      @aclayhosuton Рік тому

      @@GuthboxFSU will never go Big 12

    • @pnut3844able
      @pnut3844able Рік тому

      ​@@Guthboxmiami isn't going to the big 12 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @Guthbox
      @Guthbox Рік тому

      @@aclayhosuton I know. I’m saying Miami would be the B1G’s fallback if the SEC were to make a move and acquire FSU.
      They wouldn’t spend the money to break the GOR for a lateral move

    • @Guthbox
      @Guthbox Рік тому

      @@pnut3844able You’re in for a rude awakening buddy… Miami isn’t even a top 3 add for ACC properties. SEC/B1G would rather acquire FSU/Clemson/UNC than you. Big dogs move first and you get the scraps.

  • @whatsoperadoc7050
    @whatsoperadoc7050 Рік тому +3

    FSU, Clemson, North Carolina and Miami to the SEC could be amazing. Imagine FSU-UF-Miami and Clemson-North Carolina-South Carolina playing each other every year.

    • @tarheel7406
      @tarheel7406 Рік тому

      Very unlikely MIAMI goes SEC, and it voted for the dilutive +3 apparently to sate ND.

    • @jcsandstorm919
      @jcsandstorm919 10 місяців тому +1

      Most of those games are already happening regardless. Clemson plays unc and USC every year already. FSU plays Florida every year. FSU plays Miami most years. USC plays UNC once every few or couple of years. Miami and the UF is the one that you don’t see much of but the rest of that we literally already see

    • @21bluefins
      @21bluefins 8 місяців тому

      @@jcsandstorm919FSU plays Miami and UF every year. In the past twenty years, I’ve only seen Miami v UF play twice..

    • @jcsandstorm919
      @jcsandstorm919 8 місяців тому

      @@21bluefins 4 times actually, 5 if you include 2003 since the year just turned. With two games scheduled in 24 and 25. But okie doke bud

    • @jcsandstorm919
      @jcsandstorm919 8 місяців тому

      @@21bluefins also I said miami and UF was the one we don’t see much of so I truly don’t understand your argument. And it was wrong lol if you’re gonna argue at least be correct

  • @terencew7716
    @terencew7716 Рік тому +5

    What is going on in the ACC??
    Eventually we are going to have 2 Super Conferences (SEC & BIG 10)

    • @cometotazmania5025
      @cometotazmania5025 Рік тому +1

      Nobody saw a conference DISAPPEARING OVERNIGHT like the PAC-12 did, rather than fade out of relevance like the old Big East/AAC. That could speed your vision forward a year or two, along with a 12 team playoff (which I think is wholly immoral).

  • @kinesjl
    @kinesjl Рік тому +1

    2023 TV viewership per school in millions per Nielsen
    1. Colorado 35.32 (4)
    2. Florida State. 19.36 (3)
    3. Ohio St. 18.67 (4)
    4. Alabama 18.21 (3)
    5. Notre Dame 18.03 (4)
    6. Texas 14.60 (3)
    7. LSU 14.41. (3)
    8. Nebraska 13.86 (4)
    9. Oregon. 12.58. (2).
    10. Clemson. 11.20
    11. Florida 10.00

  • @MarkStanley-dc4pp
    @MarkStanley-dc4pp 9 місяців тому +1

    Michigan is not Auburn tigers that gets beat by a hail Mary throw finebaum

  • @antoniobaker7033
    @antoniobaker7033 8 місяців тому +1

    FSU ain’t coming to the SEC you can forget that 💩

  • @mgt2010fla
    @mgt2010fla 10 місяців тому

    The buyout to leave the ACC is so high you guys need to drink less Kentucky bourbon before going on air!

  • @CATownsend777
    @CATownsend777 9 місяців тому +1

    Now you will have players traveling cross country more often and further than previous years. I don'y know if that is a good thing. Right now, I say its not.
    All this money to students is wrong. All this throwing away tradition is wrong. This distruction of conferences is just wrong. Who is to blame? ESPN. ESPN has also highjacked the entire Bowl season.

  • @laurakilmer8652
    @laurakilmer8652 10 місяців тому +2

    Look art those GIANT EARS

  • @LaybackDre
    @LaybackDre 3 місяці тому

    FSU, Clemson and UNC should head there.

  • @mallardcutter7209
    @mallardcutter7209 5 місяців тому

    None of the ACC football teams , outside of Clemson, have a realistic chance to do any good in the SEC. A lot of rivalries will be lost in the midst of this “ super conference “ thing.

  • @TL-qr3ii
    @TL-qr3ii 10 місяців тому +1

    North Carolina to Big 10 to get both high academics and high athletics. SEC is among the weakest academic institutions, which suits Clemson and FSU but not UNC and UVA and GT.

  • @wa1w511
    @wa1w511 Рік тому +2

    I don't think the SEC wants to expand right now.

    • @rlhaff3560
      @rlhaff3560 5 місяців тому

      Good. FSU to the BIG10 anyway! And BTW... that will be a HUGE mistake... letting the BIG10 into the state of Florida, it would truly be a national conference... as opposed to the Hillbilly league lol

    • @wa1w511
      @wa1w511 5 місяців тому

      @@rlhaff3560 Adler's family dynamics: The more children you have, the more diluted down the intellectual environment of the family unit becomes.....enjoy your diluted environment.

  • @ethad123
    @ethad123 Рік тому +4

    Florida St has to pay 120m grant of rights to get out of the ACC. It’s not happening

    • @MercerKnowsBall
      @MercerKnowsBall Рік тому +3

      No that is the BUYOUT from the ACC. The GOR is $700 Million with the Buyout on top of that. But you are right. It's not happening.

    • @jcelldogs
      @jcelldogs Рік тому

      I wonder if all the teams at once just decided to leave. The acc wouldn't be able to collect anything lol. You probably have all the athletic directors behind the scenes working up a plan to bail on the acc at once lol.

    • @MercerKnowsBall
      @MercerKnowsBall Рік тому

      @@jcelldogs There is nowhere to go for more than half of them

  • @terryurich4733
    @terryurich4733 7 місяців тому +1

    FLST is going to the BIG

  • @richardbrookins5406
    @richardbrookins5406 9 місяців тому +1

    First thing he ever said I agreed with.

    • @tiger_spawn4223
      @tiger_spawn4223 7 місяців тому

      We gotta stop killing off these conferences. First the pac 12, now possibly the ACC...this is getting out of hand.

  • @joshparnell7755
    @joshparnell7755 Рік тому +3

    The SEC and ACC should just merge, wholesale. The B1G is now a national conference with big programs in big markets, set up to make the most money over the long term. Now they’re looking hungrily at the Southeast and the east coast, Rutgers isn’t satisfying that hunger. The B1G will definitely come for FSU, Miami, North Carolina, Duke, and when they’ve got them, they’ll be looking to get a Texas school too. You think A&M or the Longhorns have any loyalty to the SEC? Make the move now while you still can.

  • @william7286
    @william7286 Рік тому +9

    Miami and Virginia Tech bring little-to-no value to the SEC. Clemson and Florida State, absolutely. North Carolina makes the most sense as the third option. I just don't see the SEC adding a private school.

    • @beaujac311
      @beaujac311 Рік тому +4

      How does Virginia Tech bring no value? The population of Virginia is 8.6 million. That would be a huge new market for the SEC.

    • @nft4751
      @nft4751 Рік тому +4

      My prediction? Boston College to the SEC!!!

    • @jumapelljohn3958
      @jumapelljohn3958 Рік тому

      100% agree.

    • @AaronCaldwell.
      @AaronCaldwell. Рік тому +2

      @@beaujac311Virginia Tech and North Carolina State will get in 100% if North Carolina and Virginia go to the B10 their done for athletics wise cuz VT and NC State will just tell the Southern Kids they recruit in their state to play in the South where they’re from or play up north for no reason. The SEC is not worried regardless they will get in to the NC and Virginia market those schools better be smart enough to see what’s going to happen if they don’t fall in line.

    • @AaronCaldwell.
      @AaronCaldwell. Рік тому

      And Miami will get in the SEC is not going to add just 2 teams next expansion Greg already said if the SEC moves again it’s going to be because the B10 did and they will do something big to counter that being 6-8 teams next time guaranteed. FSU, Clemson, UNC, Miami, Louisville, GT, Virginia, & VT(orDuke). If Virginia and UNC don’t fall in line it would be VT, and NC State/Duke

  • @jumapelljohn3958
    @jumapelljohn3958 Рік тому +6

    The SEC now has to counter the B10 with these moves of Washington and Oregon. Clemson and FSU get the most eyeballs on TV and should be next for the SEC.

    • @hummushero9428
      @hummushero9428 Рік тому +1

      ESPN is silly posting this, they can’t allow teams to move from the ACC to the SEC just because they own both contracts, allowing anyone to leave means they can go where they choose. This is fairly obvious legally.

    • @AaronCaldwell.
      @AaronCaldwell. Рік тому

      @@hummushero9428not if contracts are involved they can make them go to the SEC

    • @hummushero9428
      @hummushero9428 Рік тому +1

      @@AaronCaldwell. they definitely can’t. Unless there was a clause in the original contract that states Disney can move teams as they choose between the two conferences. Which is virtually impossible. They also can’t just let some move and not others. All teams would have to agree individually to A) dissolve or B) switch conferences, also C) the SEC teams would need a majority vote to allow it. A contract is binding both ways, they can’t force anything that wasn’t agreed upon in the original signed document. You don’t need to be a Lawyer to understand this.

    • @edl7454
      @edl7454 9 місяців тому

      Grantofrights belongs to the ACC not ESPN@@hummushero9428

  • @etool4355
    @etool4355 Рік тому +2

    We are officially at a point where off-field news is way more interesting and important than what happens on the field.

  • @jeffherman6330
    @jeffherman6330 Рік тому +2

    Assume Uconn and Gonzaga join the Big12. At that point we need to stop thinking conferences.
    Big 12 has stated they want to divide basketball and football media rights. Why would they do that? Simple, Big 12 is going to breakaway in basketball and start own league and own NCAA Tournament.
    If Big 12 says you can join or be left behind, what do you think they do? If Duke and UNC have to choose between being a basketball school or a football school what do you think they pick?

    • @tarheel7406
      @tarheel7406 Рік тому

      a) UCONN and GONA will only join the BIG12 in full, and the B12 has used it pro rata slots and has to self-finance G5s.
      b) If the BIG12 separated from the rest, the rest would say good luck.
      c) No feasible chain of events ends with UNC in the BIG12.

  • @RT22-pb2pp
    @RT22-pb2pp 10 місяців тому +1

    No.we have enough bad bottom feeders need no.more. fsu woul lose 5 a yr in sec

  • @OUGregory940
    @OUGregory940 2 місяці тому

    I love how we’re 11 months from this video and all the fake news has come to fruition and that none of these so called expansions are happening. 😂

  • @allstarchris1
    @allstarchris1 Рік тому +6

    FSU leaves Miami will go too. They have their rivalry, it can not be broken up.

    • @lazyakers
      @lazyakers Рік тому +3

      Sure it can. No rivalry is safe in realignment.

  • @CCease2014
    @CCease2014 3 місяці тому +1

    If the sec takes unc, they’re gonna probably take duke and nc state, unc sucks at football compared to duke and nc state, they don’t have as good of academics as duke and nc state, and duke and nc state both can compete against unc in all sports (nc state a little less in basketball, but if they keep doing what they are doing they won’t be long). Hate if you want but they only think unc has is Micheal Jordon on their Jersey 🤷‍♂️

    • @CapeFear1
      @CapeFear1 День тому

      I agree with you in that I don't see much difference between current UNC, Duke, and NC State football, or even not a great gap in the past between them in on field wins and losses. But I think UNC is for whatever reason a much more coveted program to add for the SEC than the other two. I do not think the SEC wants all 3 and I think the chance of the SEC actually taking all 3 is right above zero.

  • @joeyfung-i
    @joeyfung-i 7 місяців тому +1

    Half of Bama just left for FSU…. 🖕

  • @arby163
    @arby163 9 місяців тому

    Miami had the #4 recruiting class

  • @buddyjenkins7188
    @buddyjenkins7188 9 місяців тому

    College football will end up like the NFL with the SEC and the BIG 10 comparable to the NFC and the AFC.

  • @505premoto
    @505premoto 9 місяців тому

    Oh, gee, we get to hear Paul tell everyone for the ten thousandth time that FSU is utter garbage. We get it, Paul. But, then again, it is hilarious so by all means, Paul, don’t stop now when you are on a roll. ESPN should make it obligatory for Paul to dump on FSU daily. He would enjoy it.

  • @mgt2010fla
    @mgt2010fla 10 місяців тому +1

    Is the Big Ten a "Super Conference" if Michigan is on suspension? I've never seen two guys talk out of both sides of their face without even blushing!

    • @garlandalmarode6396
      @garlandalmarode6396 9 місяців тому

      A super conference that rarely wins anything, but they shouldn't let the truth get in the way of a good story. We know they never do at Espn.

    • @mgt2010fla
      @mgt2010fla 9 місяців тому

      @@garlandalmarode6396 And yet, four historically great academic Universities decided to leave the Pac 12 to join the Big Ten, which is the highest ranked academic conference in college football! Only one member of the newly expanded Big Ten is not a member of the AAU, Nebraska. So, the difference is the Big Ten starts with Academics while the SEC starts with players that couldn't sniff a college campus, or graduate from high school, if it wasn't for football. Now there are more SEC schools who have raised standards for academics, Florida for one. Which shows the trade-off of being a University that plays football, and other sports, or a football team that plays on a College campus. Priority's will always have a price! For the four Pac 12 schools the price is they will make more money while not lowering their standards! Win-Win.

  • @BamaScorpio69
    @BamaScorpio69 Рік тому +1

    GOR = Ain't nobody goin' anywhere anytime sooner or later!
    U can take that to da'bank!!!

    • @tarheel7406
      @tarheel7406 Рік тому

      The +3 is a GOR breach unless the objectors are kept whole over 10+ years and through several "look ins". See TX/OK.

    • @BamaScorpio69
      @BamaScorpio69 Рік тому

      @tarheel7406 Don't understand a word you said but the ACC GOR ain't gonna be broken anytime soon or later.

  • @2irl
    @2irl 11 місяців тому

    The U could really benefit, they need to live up to it.

  • @TheKevinNewsom
    @TheKevinNewsom Рік тому +5

    FSU, Clemson, UNC for sure.

    • @volbound1700
      @volbound1700 Рік тому +3

      They are likely top 3 on SEC's list. If SEC doesn't get UNC, I can see NC State getting the nod.

    • @williambush406
      @williambush406 Рік тому

      Wrong it’s not all about sports it’s also about academics unc fits with the b10

    • @AaronCaldwell.
      @AaronCaldwell. Рік тому +1

      @@williambush4060% true it’s about cultural fits North Carolina is a Southerner state culturally and identity wise amongst the fans and kids there and the SEC will get into North Carolina regardless and destroy NorthCarolina by putting their money into NC State and all those kids in NC would go there as it’s a Southern State. North Carolina would be committing the death penalty to their athletics recruiting just like any other schools that would join the B10 that’s in the south that’s what happened to Georgia Tech after it left the SEC and same thing would happen to Virginia as the SEC would then take Virginia Tech to take out Virginia

    • @AaronCaldwell.
      @AaronCaldwell. Рік тому

      @@williambush406That’s why the SEC is more worried about FSU and Clemson they know they’re getting into NC and Virginia regardless and will destroy the NorthCarolina and Virginia if they don’t fall in line by getting their rivals in the same State the only way the SEC losses anything is FSU and Clemson go to the B10

    • @AaronCaldwell.
      @AaronCaldwell. Рік тому

      @@williambush406Then again if FSU does that they would be committing athletic’s death too cuz the SEC would then go after Miami and they already have Florida so most of those ACC teams are forced to walk the line and join or have to deal with SEC schools 10minutes across town recruiting southern kids to play in the south or play in the North for no reason other then the University making money for it’s self not them.

  • @eddiejones6886
    @eddiejones6886 9 місяців тому

    As well as well as Notre Dame to the big ten not sure about Clemson

  • @raygrant9768
    @raygrant9768 10 місяців тому

    Sure glad i don't work ESPN going down to Fl. to do any sport game going to eat at there restaurant , going to there bars to drink there drinks ,going to hotel to sleep in there beds good luck

  • @davewallace1613
    @davewallace1613 7 місяців тому +2

    Sec sucks

  • @wildbillwilmoth98
    @wildbillwilmoth98 Рік тому +3

    SO Big 10+Pac 12 , ACC+Big 12 merge and the SEC stays the same. or College Football Playoffs become the College Football League or something like that and they basically have a two conference system. Western Conference (Big10+Pac 12) & SEC/ACC/Big 12 and they have a relegation system with group of conferences to see who goes up and who goes down.

    • @tarheel7406
      @tarheel7406 Рік тому

      An ACC/BIG12 would lower the average media value of the ACC members.

  • @briandonegan8480
    @briandonegan8480 Рік тому +7

    Honestly if the ACC imploded Duke and North Carolina just seem to be better Big 10 fits. To me (especially for natural traditional rivalries already established) Clemson, FSU, Georgia Tech, and Louisville fit very well from the jump. To make room let Mizzou head back to the Big 12. I know this will be controversial but Vanderbilt deserves a place where a football program can get built. In the Big 10 they might find such a place
    I am just rambling at this point

    • @timotundy
      @timotundy Рік тому

      Duke doesn’t bring the football revenue. Basketball doesn’t mean anything in this discussion

    • @Butler_Buck
      @Butler_Buck Рік тому +3

      No Duke in the Big 10. Football doesn't make it.

    • @2040wagon
      @2040wagon Рік тому +3

      Vandy needs to be in academic conference with Duke, Rice, and Northwestern. If Stanford and Cal were closer that would be better.

    • @Guthbox
      @Guthbox Рік тому +2

      ⁠@@Butler_BuckDuke football probably has a better shot than Miami in the B1G nowadays😂
      Mike Elko owns Coral Gables

    • @observer46-vh5bm
      @observer46-vh5bm Рік тому +1

      Why would the B1G want Vandy and why would Vandy leave the SEC. The academics at FSU want the B1G. The FSU fans want the SEC.
      What does FSU really do for the SEC? Invitation will be a defensive move to block B1G.

  • @arronfrazier7873
    @arronfrazier7873 Рік тому

    The SEC isn't going to be the play for Miami and FSU! They are the two most valuable brands left out there not names Notre Dame! Why? They have history! They are in the 3rd largest state. That means nothing to the SEC because Florida is already in the SEC. The B10 wants in the South to be truly nation in all regions. Their next logical move is to the 3rd largest state for Miami and FSU! The base B10 schools benefit more from Florida because its closer for recruiting than California. There are a ton of B10 alums and fans down here in Florida. It would be major hit to the SEC to be in their back yard. The B10 will want that. Miami and FSU would get full shares right away! It would add two more schools who if ran right just like USC can match and beat any of the top dogs in the SEC.

    • @tarheel7406
      @tarheel7406 Рік тому +1

      More and more reporters are confirming that UNC is the top ACC target for both the SEC and B1G. Hope you're right though, as I prefer UNC go to the SEC if it must move.

    • @arronfrazier7873
      @arronfrazier7873 Рік тому

      @@tarheel7406 I don't care about the SEC as a Miami fan who lives here in Florida! The B10 makes more money than the SEC. The B10 is now national! They come into the South aka Florida with Miami and FSU, they will be truly national from coast to coast in every region. That is something the tv partners are going to want because of the matchups. Contray to SEC fans, without USC, UCLA, Oregon, Washington, Miami and FSU in the conference currently, they have more fans and alums that the current SEC teams. That is why they make more money than the SEC. Also, the matchup of Miami and FSU playing Ohio State, Penn State, Michigan, Nebraska, Wisconsin, USC and UCLA will be national rating gold that the B10 tv partners will love and want for their tv slots on a weekly basis. Another thing, here in Florida, there are a ton of B10 fans and alums living here in this state. They moved here the last 20 plus years. I'm from the Chicagoland aka MidWest. Also, recruiting. The B10 would be closer to Florida with Miami and FSU than California with USC and UCLA. The base B10 schools recruit Florida already, they will be able to recruit more because they can tell Florida kids, we will play Miami and FSU in Florida or at home in their 3 to 5 year CFB career!

    • @tarheel7406
      @tarheel7406 Рік тому

      @@arronfrazier7873
      a) The B1G will wane to #2 in money and power if it just adds MIAMI/FSu.
      b) National is not an asset
      Won't bother with the rest, as you never learn and haven't adjusted for recent actual events.

    • @arronfrazier7873
      @arronfrazier7873 Рік тому

      @@tarheel7406 No, it will not! The B10 is in every region except the South! They have the 1#, 4#, 5#, 6# and 7# most populated states. They footprint is in the cities of LA, NYC, Chicago, Washington, Philly, SF/Oakland! The 3# largest state is Florida with multiple top 20 tv markets!

    • @tarheel7406
      @tarheel7406 Рік тому

      @@arronfrazier7873 The B1G wants and must expand south for the long-term, but actual evidences indicates it won't be with CLEMSON and/or FSU.
      Your failure to account for actual events illustrates your bias. You are predicting what you want to happen regardless of the evidence. In contrast, I am predicting what I don't want to happen because of the evidence.

  • @Hillcountryoperations
    @Hillcountryoperations Рік тому

    Guys we are forgetting about Norte dame, what will they do?

    • @mj6493
      @mj6493 Рік тому

      Apparently Notre Dame still likes being independent. As long as they've got a contract with NBC, they'll be fine.

    • @jcelldogs
      @jcelldogs Рік тому

      Big ten in my opinion. The B1G have their usc rival already locked up, and michigan is a huge rivalry when they play their on and off again years. Joining the conference would make it yearly. Also michigan state and Purdue are also big ones for the Irish. If the big can get Stanford, then it's almost a wrap that notre dame would come.

  • @TheHardTake
    @TheHardTake Рік тому

    lol y’all don’t want Clemson it seems. I wonder why?

  • @americanhero1234
    @americanhero1234 Рік тому +2

    SEC is the old men conference.......I am looking for excitement not old and stale.

  • @mikebailey3680
    @mikebailey3680 7 місяців тому

    Florida holds the cards to FSU's future.

    • @mikebailey3680
      @mikebailey3680 7 місяців тому

      I'm thinking it has to be unanimous....

  • @glennruess3324
    @glennruess3324 Рік тому

    Why do you keep mentioning academics at UNC - the same school with the huge academic scandal just a few years ago, that school?

    • @tarheel7406
      @tarheel7406 Рік тому

      Yep. Athletic scandal actually.

  • @Tri-StarTN
    @Tri-StarTN 11 місяців тому +1

    Georgia Tech, Florida State and Tulane

  • @Da-Boo33
    @Da-Boo33 Рік тому +4

    Fsu and clemson replace Missouri and Vanderbilt

  • @carlcarl2879
    @carlcarl2879 Рік тому +1

    As a hurricanes fan we don't need the SEC Miami will be in the big ten which makes sense financially, & academically playing against Ohio State, Michigan, penn state, USC, Wisconsin, etcetc is better than playing in the country backwards overrated SEC & Miami's football program is coming back really fast under Mario crystabal Miami will be really good in football this year & beyond they will be on Georgia's & Alabama's level in 2024

  • @stilllmkp
    @stilllmkp Рік тому

    Leave the sides

  • @vandos11
    @vandos11 Рік тому

    ACC will stay together finebaum is wrong as usual

    • @tarheel7406
      @tarheel7406 Рік тому

      The recent expansion practically assures losing the 3 objectors.

  • @jaysmith7725
    @jaysmith7725 10 місяців тому

    Don’t nobody wanna go to SEC I know Florida State don’t we’re going the other direction baby making more money Finna take over college football

  • @paulmkz
    @paulmkz Рік тому +1

    I think Big ten has all the say who goes where. They have the most money plain and simple

    • @roberthuxen3461
      @roberthuxen3461 Рік тому

      Yes, BIG has everything but football teams that can defeat teams from the SEC. When the South ended segregation, and the black athletes stayed in the South, the Big was done.

  • @davidgodoy826
    @davidgodoy826 Рік тому +1

    The SEC doesn’t want UM they are to weak to be in the SEC every game will be a blowout 😂

  • @eddiejones6886
    @eddiejones6886 9 місяців тому

    FSU is going to the big ten

  • @ericlofroos2405
    @ericlofroos2405 Рік тому +3

    NOLES, SEC! Nuff said!

  • @3321far
    @3321far Рік тому +2

    The next step is contraction. Vanderbilt, Missouri, and the two Mississippi schools will be asked to leave. FSU, Clemson, Miami, and Notre Dame will be invited. Any school paid more than they generate will be gone from the super-conferences.

  • @GregasaurausRex
    @GregasaurausRex 9 місяців тому

    Florida State, Clemson, a North Carolina and a Virginia school.

  • @booster222jc
    @booster222jc 9 місяців тому

    The SEC should grab FSU, Clemson, North Carolina and Virginia before the B10 even gets any two of these programs.

  • @barryfinkle1755
    @barryfinkle1755 Рік тому +1

    It's money, bud. So weird he downplayed it.

  • @eddiejones6886
    @eddiejones6886 9 місяців тому

    North Carolina will be going to the big ten as well

  • @David-pt6zk
    @David-pt6zk 9 місяців тому

    If Georgia Tech goes to big 10 this gets Atlanta t.v. market and recruiting for big 10 in the South and the SEC better be talking to Georgia Tech bout coming back pronto

  • @finallythetruthisout761
    @finallythetruthisout761 9 місяців тому +1

    FSU has a weak culture. Not an SEC member worthy school in my opinion. Send them to the Big 10.

  • @theonyxtavern
    @theonyxtavern Рік тому

    Play in the SEC over the ACC? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @kellyfoster3521
    @kellyfoster3521 Рік тому +1

    In the next 3 years there will only be 3 Conferences. I think ACC and Pac 12 will be dead. Maybe in 5 yrs at the longest. 3 Super Conferences. Just me

    • @tarheel7406
      @tarheel7406 Рік тому

      A peer P3 is no longer feasible.

  • @nateg4582
    @nateg4582 9 місяців тому

    I think the SEC is only interested in FSU and Clemson.

  • @bucknut6631
    @bucknut6631 Рік тому

    The Big 10. It just pays more.

  • @nothingman27511
    @nothingman27511 9 місяців тому +1

    SEC has expressed no interest, but if they wanted into the NC market, NC State is 12-5 in their last 17 football meetings with UNC - total domination. NCSU is a larger school, an engineering / STEM school whose graduates make 3 times the money of UNC graduates (academics?). It is true that UNC has more academic scandals and shootings, so they can make that point, plus UNC's Board of Governors has been taken over by brainwashed political people with an agenda (not a good one).
    Basketball programs are now equal due to portal, although NCSU went to the NCAA tourney last year while UNC stayed home. UNC was "given" a national title in hoops in 2005, and Rashad McCants later admitted that he never went to class or did anything academic that year. You guys need to get up to speed about the University of Nonstop Cheating.

  • @paulmkz
    @paulmkz Рік тому

    I think Big ten wants to be in SEC country in the south. Big ten gets Fl st, Clemson, Unc, and Ga Tech. I think SEC would get Miami, NC St, Uva, and Virginia tech

    • @nerinamak3298
      @nerinamak3298 Рік тому

      B1G don't want FSU and Clemson. If they take 4 teams it will be UVA, UNC, GT and Miami (all AAU schools). FSU and Clemson will go to the SEC.

    • @paulmkz
      @paulmkz Рік тому

      @nerinamak3298 I think FSU is now AAU. To me they would take FSU, Unc, Uva, and GT. SEC would take Clemson, Ncst, VT, and Miami if Acc folds.

    • @ronelite582
      @ronelite582 Рік тому +1

      @@paulmkzno skin sack. The SEC will have first dibs of the top tier ACC teams. The fans, boosters and some administrators would prefer SEC due to southern proximity. The academic aspect is way overblown. If it wasn’t, Stanford ans Cal would be BIG members instead of ACC partials.

  • @acito_20
    @acito_20 Рік тому +3

    If they lost UNC basketball will be done in the ACC

    • @MercerKnowsBall
      @MercerKnowsBall Рік тому +1

      LMAO stupid AF

    • @StreakingTiger
      @StreakingTiger Рік тому +2

      Dude, I don't even watch BBall and you have no clue as UNC is NOT the UNC of old. Very beatable these days. That said - UNC will always stay where Duke is. Neither leaving.

    • @ld4974
      @ld4974 Рік тому

      Duke. UVA. Wake. Syracuse. The ACC would be fine.

    • @williambush406
      @williambush406 Рік тому

      @@ld4974uva would leave with unc

    • @williambush406
      @williambush406 Рік тому +1

      And uva would follow unc together so your not wrong

  • @HanRollinger
    @HanRollinger Рік тому

    видос как обычно годный. спасибо тебе за работу🌎

    • @trclark7689
      @trclark7689 11 місяців тому +1

      that's what she said?

  • @natedunker123
    @natedunker123 Рік тому +3

    SEC. fsu clem miami va

    • @williambush406
      @williambush406 Рік тому

      UVA would follow unc to the big10 because of the academic level

  • @cramirez3855
    @cramirez3855 Рік тому +4

    Sun Belt football is more entertaining than Sec and Acc because the teams actually compete more evenly instead of watching one school beat the life out of an underfunded program

    • @BB-uu9oo
      @BB-uu9oo Рік тому +4

      Tell yourself that

    • @Willworld.
      @Willworld. Рік тому +2

      Keep lying to yourself

  • @spiderchaw5153
    @spiderchaw5153 Рік тому +1

    i could see fsu being sec they fit

  • @indigdoc
    @indigdoc 9 місяців тому

    Duke??? Surely you jest! B1G will go 2 ACC teams. FSU & UNC. NC State will want to go with UNCCheaat. Duke to the Big East - with Notre Dame and Syracuse.

  • @NealAskew-k7d
    @NealAskew-k7d Рік тому

    Unc and academics? Was that a joke? You guys never heard of the no attend classes

  • @williambush406
    @williambush406 Рік тому

    UVA and unc going to big10 this week 100%

    • @rreagan007
      @rreagan007 Рік тому +2

      no they're not

    • @williambush406
      @williambush406 Рік тому +1

      @@rreagan007 explain

    • @rreagan007
      @rreagan007 Рік тому

      @@williambush406 It's not going to happen this week because of the grant of rights and exit fee. It could happen in 10 years or so.

    • @williambush406
      @williambush406 Рік тому

      @@rreagan007 they can leave it just cost a lot

    • @tarheel7406
      @tarheel7406 Рік тому

      Didn't age well.