This is how you make a review of a camera! Gordon points out the features of the GFX, while not expressing personal opinion! He will tell you what he is impressed with, but he wont start and flame on the product he reviews.
I like Gordon and his work but your definition of unbiased is, well, actually - biased. I, for one, don’t want to hear only about what the reviewer is impressed with - pointing out issues and reasonable flame are as necessary. That’s balanced.
Really great in depth review, as usual. Handling plus ibis plus resolution plus decent lenses gave stunning results... everything else seemed nitpicking. Well done Fuji.
Thanks Gordon, another excellent review! I'll book mark this camera for my 2029 Ebay searches. No seriously though, even though this is such an impressive camera, breaking boundaries with MF, I feel like it's still kind of niche due to it's weight, size and cost, and FF seems like the best compromise. Side glance at the Sony A7R4 :D
Exactly - oh my goodness, don't get me started on that bloke. He has some good things to say and seems to have a lot of knowledge, however his cussing, swearing, ranting and vitriol directed at everybody in sundry, really makes him totally unwatchable. If he realised how ridiculous he comes across some times, I'm sure he would cringe! Philip
For quick handheld stuff, can't see its advantage over a7 r4; for landscape that 23mmF4 lens is a killer. Sony simply don't have anything close to compete in terms of raw resolving power.
Obviously not, they are completely differently systems, and Sony is the leader now in focus and the programming that goes with it. Hard to not want to get a Sony system.
@@cameralabs Not yet, I will. To be honest, I'm more a "Pentax guy", but I like to improve my knowledge about photography. I feel I'm at the right place for that !
Ha Ha - I love the 'deer in the headlights' look on the faces of the poor sods you dragged in as models, totally hilarious. You made a great review even better by adding a bit of unintentional humour - well done! Philip
Gordon Laing I’m interested in what other lenses can be used as well. Does it make sense to wait or use Hasselblad lenses. Btw, I’m an abstract artist interested in using this camera to shoot my work. Is the 110 lens best? Perhaps another video from you is in the offing. Take care
00:34 Holding a $10k camera over water without the neck strap on; you're a very brave man. My butterfingers would drop it in an instant, and then I'd proceed to cry, haha.
I am a big fan of IBIS and I have been shooting with it since 2013. However for this camera I really don’t need it as the camera would always be on a tripod. Since I shoot landscapes and do so many very long exposures.
Gordon you make my pee boiling. Such a well ballanced review that even appears trustworthy. But you could aslo costme several thousands of USD. I've spend that a lot of timeand money on everthing from u42, APS-C and FF, so expensive in that repoect..no, it is not really. I haven't seen similar well looking files diectly OOC. It's incredible and you are giving acces to a self studdy of ir. Thanks, thanks, thanks. GC
Ya have to embrace those wrinkles, Gordon! That aside, I think what's most noteworthy about this camera is that it's a larger-than-35mm format digital camera with a very high resolution that's also barely more difficult to use than a more "standard" mirrorless camera. Yes, it's expensive at $10k, but considering what it has (and its unashamedly small target market alongside its cheaper launch price than contemporaries), I think Fuji has got a bit of a winner here. It's not my personal cup of tea (the X-T3 performs just fine for me), but the geek in me can't help but be interested in what it brings to the table.
I got one question Gordon: after using the gfx100 for a few days and examining the pictures...how is it to go back to a full frame or cheaper camera? Does it feel like you are missing something? It would be hard for me to let go of that beast of a camera ...that picture quality must be amazing...
Well, you notice that you're not zooming-in as much to reach 100%, but cheaper full-frame and APSC can still look amazing. Plus, I was getting tired lugging it around.
@2:02 FINALLY... someone compares this camera (or sensor at least) to other Medium Format Digital cameras. Yes, we all know it is above and beyond m4/3, APS-C, Full Frame, etc... but how does it compare to a Hasselblad or Phase One?
Great camera, great review, thanks for this..finally i can conclude that getting a sony a7iv is a more parctical choice over the gfx100...sony a7iv might not be able to compete with it but imagine the more useful gear that you could buy for 10k$. When starting as a pro...very in depth review indeed :)
Thanks! Yes, you'd have a lot of budget left for lenses, travel - and coffee donations! - if you went the full-frame route. But they are different beasts as you know.
@@cameralabs indeed..sony a7IV is just a different case, im a pro on a budget, i think the gfx is worth the investment, but wat the clients usually want is just a sharp and wonderful photo that they can keep forever, the gfx100 is just out of my reach right now lol..
I could not agree more with Gordon's observations about the poorly conceived and executed control dials. I have been a long time GFX and X series user in the mountains. I got rid of the 50s to upgrade to this with a 5-10 year plan in mind. Doing away with the X series dials is fine, however the controls feel pointlessly small and fallible. Fuji needed to fondle a Leica SL to realise they have let this £10,000 camera down. I will leave aside any attempt to apologise for the vertical non-grip. The joy stick is needlessly small. Fuji could have learnt from the big, rubberised knob on the Leica SL - the gold standard for easy to fondle joysticks in cold conditions in the mountains. Equally, compare the unmissable, precise dials on the front and rear of the SL to these mini dials. They really do feel minuscule and too small for a thumb. Really disappointed by the rank controls.
No, mirrorless does NOT mean small, it means without a mirror, so there's an electronic viewfinder and full-time live view. A DSLR has an optical viewfinder and a mirror which, fo a camera with this size sensor, would be about 50% bigger still.
As a painter I would like to pride myself on my appreciation of colour, yet I find the film simulations on my XT3 all but useless. The only one's at all useable are Provia and Pro Negative Standard. All the rest are eccentric gimmicks. As for the celebrated Acros, it is identical to any black and white photograph that has been underexposed by a third of a stop. As a Fuji owner I am baffled by all the mythologising this brand encourages.
That wasn't the point being made. The point was, this camera might be out of the price range of most people buying a camera, but it's still interesting to admire and check it out.
This camera is bigger than what it is. The VF should be integrated so it does not take the hot shoe. For now it is overprice and need to be design better.
This is how you make a review of a camera! Gordon points out the features of the GFX, while not expressing personal opinion! He will tell you what he is impressed with, but he wont start and flame on the product he reviews.
Thanks, glad you enjoyed it!
I like Gordon and his work but your definition of unbiased is, well, actually - biased. I, for one, don’t want to hear only about what the reviewer is impressed with - pointing out issues and reasonable flame are as necessary. That’s balanced.
@@PK-ql5en I always point out the good and the bad and believe I did so in this video.
Every other review I've seen of this to date is rubbish compared to this review... Bravo!
@@DJLazinator thanks!
I have learned to always look for Gordon’s reviews avoid the others. Simple solid honest review.
Thanks!
Really great in depth review, as usual. Handling plus ibis plus resolution plus decent lenses gave stunning results... everything else seemed nitpicking. Well done Fuji.
I fully agree. Superb review. I learned a few things about cameras in the process. Much appreciated
You're welcome!
This is indeed a very well done review with opinions left out and pictures left in. Guys like Gordon and Dustin Abbott know how to do proper reviews.
Thanks Gordon, another excellent review! I'll book mark this camera for my 2029 Ebay searches. No seriously though, even though this is such an impressive camera, breaking boundaries with MF, I feel like it's still kind of niche due to it's weight, size and cost, and FF seems like the best compromise. Side glance at the Sony A7R4 :D
Don't worry, I'll be going back to my A7r IV final review material soon!
Been shooting GFX since 2017. Stunning, stunning system.
The ibis footage looks really good. Fuji is really doing well hope they make faster lenses.
Thanks, yes, it's pretty impressive isn't it?
Angry, AKA the Village Idiot, this is how you make a world-class camera review video. Awesome job Gordon, keep it up.
Thanks!
Exactly - oh my goodness, don't get me started on that bloke. He has some good things to say and seems to have a lot of knowledge, however his cussing, swearing, ranting and vitriol directed at everybody in sundry, really makes him totally unwatchable. If he realised how ridiculous he comes across some times, I'm sure he would cringe! Philip
@@philipsutton2316 I've never seen who you're talking about so can't comment.
@@cameralabs The Angry Photographer.
@@dfj555 I don't know him.
For quick handheld stuff, can't see its advantage over a7 r4; for landscape that 23mmF4 lens is a killer. Sony simply don't have anything close to compete in terms of raw resolving power.
Obviously not, they are completely differently systems, and Sony is the leader now in focus and the programming that goes with it. Hard to not want to get a Sony system.
@Chris I would love a gfx 50s Mark 2 if it came with a hybrid backside illuminated x trans sensor 5. I would buy that without delay or hesitating
That thing is a beast - Sony aint gonna put a dent in it despite calling their new cam on par with medium format
Yes, the A7r IV is impressive, but this is different.
I'm just discovering your channel. You made a great job for a precise and complete review. I'm impressed (and I subscribe) !
thanks, glad you found me! Hope you saw my other GFX100 review too.
@@cameralabs Not yet, I will. To be honest, I'm more a "Pentax guy", but I like to improve my knowledge about photography. I feel I'm at the right place for that !
Ha Ha - I love the 'deer in the headlights' look on the faces of the poor sods you dragged in as models, totally hilarious. You made a great review even better by adding a bit of unintentional humour - well done! Philip
Oops - the 'poor sod' is you - sorry!
@@philipsutton2316 er, I thought I looked ok.
The best review I’ve seen of the Fujifilm GFX 100. Great job 👍😎
Thanks! I was just thinking about this camera again today now that more lenses are being launched
Gordon Laing I’m interested in what other lenses can be used as well. Does it make sense to wait or use Hasselblad lenses. Btw, I’m an abstract artist interested in using this camera to shoot my work. Is the 110 lens best? Perhaps another video from you is in the offing. Take care
Horrific moire on the Tate brickwork at 1080p but not at 4k. Thanks for a very thorough review, again.
I do agree with you... there should be a 50mpx version of this camera... with a lower price tag.... I'll buy it in a second!!
What an outstanding review. Extremely useful for a GFX50S owner, considering this behemoth.
Thanks!
I'd like to see a GFX 100 mk ii with some of your gripes addressed. Or maybe a GFX 150. Either way, a great camera that I'd like to own one day.
00:34 Holding a $10k camera over water without the neck strap on; you're a very brave man. My butterfingers would drop it in an instant, and then I'd proceed to cry, haha.
Don't worry, there was a deck below there, but it would have probably knocked out a tourist...
Thank you for delivering us what Kai W couldn't
Hah! We have quite different styles and approaches. I'm friends with Kai, he's a goodfella.
I am a big fan of IBIS and I have been shooting with it since 2013. However for this camera I really don’t need it as the camera would always be on a tripod. Since I shoot landscapes and do so many very long exposures.
Gordon you make my pee boiling. Such a well ballanced review that even appears trustworthy. But you could aslo costme several thousands of USD.
I've spend that a lot of timeand money on everthing from u42, APS-C and FF, so expensive in that repoect..no, it is not really.
I haven't seen similar well looking files diectly OOC. It's incredible and you are giving acces to a self studdy of ir.
Thanks, thanks, thanks.
GC
You're welcome! You can download my samples on the review page at www.cameralabs.com/fujifilm-gfx-100-review/ if you're interested!
Ya have to embrace those wrinkles, Gordon!
That aside, I think what's most noteworthy about this camera is that it's a larger-than-35mm format digital camera with a very high resolution that's also barely more difficult to use than a more "standard" mirrorless camera. Yes, it's expensive at $10k, but considering what it has (and its unashamedly small target market alongside its cheaper launch price than contemporaries), I think Fuji has got a bit of a winner here. It's not my personal cup of tea (the X-T3 performs just fine for me), but the geek in me can't help but be interested in what it brings to the table.
No way! I'm gonna fight those wrinkles with all the tech I can find!
Nice review, Gordon! Haha, gotta chuckle a little at face detection and phase detection😄
Oh I know, I hate having to say them both!
Greatly appreciate all of your videos and insights
Thanks!
Very detailed and enjoyable review thx.
6:13 f/11... DPReview shot their studio scene at f/5.6, they found smaller apertures to suffer from diffraction at such pixel density.
I got one question Gordon: after using the gfx100 for a few days and examining the pictures...how is it to go back to a full frame or cheaper camera? Does it feel like you are missing something? It would be hard for me to let go of that beast of a camera ...that picture quality must be amazing...
Well, you notice that you're not zooming-in as much to reach 100%, but cheaper full-frame and APSC can still look amazing. Plus, I was getting tired lugging it around.
Excellent review. Great work, mate.
Thanks!
This is actually a better vlog camera than anything from Panasonic right now 😂
The more I use it for vlogging, the more I think... hmmm, maybe...!
Great video amazing but unfortunately Fuji doesn't have much lenses like Nikon or canon and this is very big problem
@2:02 FINALLY... someone compares this camera (or sensor at least) to other Medium Format Digital cameras. Yes, we all know it is above and beyond m4/3, APS-C, Full Frame, etc... but how does it compare to a Hasselblad or Phase One?
Thanks! I think it's important to say where everything fits in.
Another fantastic video...great work!
Thanks!
IS there an Adapter for Canon er lenses?
Thanks for a very interesting review! Sadly it will be a cold day in Hell before I can afford one of those things.
Me too, but we can dream!
If I had $10k to spend on photography, I would buy the best gear I can for 1000 and visit 3 exotic counties for the other 9000 :)
Also a very good plan!
5:25 Time has done what time does for everyone. Keep living Gordon. Responsibility. Matthew 5:3
Don't worry, I'm having fun!
Non native speaker here. Is it possible to reliably tell which one of "phase" vs "face" he was talking about just by listening?
It's hard to tell even as a native speaker. Sorry for any confusion.
Great camera, great review, thanks for this..finally i can conclude that getting a sony a7iv is a more parctical choice over the gfx100...sony a7iv might not be able to compete with it but imagine the more useful gear that you could buy for 10k$. When starting as a pro...very in depth review indeed :)
Thanks! Yes, you'd have a lot of budget left for lenses, travel - and coffee donations! - if you went the full-frame route. But they are different beasts as you know.
@@cameralabs indeed..sony a7IV is just a different case, im a pro on a budget, i think the gfx is worth the investment, but wat the clients usually want is just a sharp and wonderful photo that they can keep forever, the gfx100 is just out of my reach right now lol..
Excellent review, thanks
You're welcome!
A technical marvel.
What about the camera though?
But is it any good with a flash?
Sorry, I have no idea about external lighting!
Great camera, I like it.
I could not agree more with Gordon's observations about the poorly conceived and executed control dials. I have been a long time GFX and X series user in the mountains. I got rid of the 50s to upgrade to this with a 5-10 year plan in mind. Doing away with the X series dials is fine, however the controls feel pointlessly small and fallible. Fuji needed to fondle a Leica SL to realise they have let this £10,000 camera down. I will leave aside any attempt to apologise for the vertical non-grip. The joy stick is needlessly small. Fuji could have learnt from the big, rubberised knob on the Leica SL - the gold standard for easy to fondle joysticks in cold conditions in the mountains. Equally, compare the unmissable, precise dials on the front and rear of the SL to these mini dials. They really do feel minuscule and too small for a thumb. Really disappointed by the rank controls.
wow best review on this :)
I've always complained about the Ferrari reviews on car shows. What's the point, 99.999% of the audience can't afford one. Same here.
It's not about being able to afford them, it's about finding out about a state of the art product - just entertainment.
I think the smooth skin makes your skin look older because it blurs pours much more than wrinkles
Thanks for you
Is this a mirrorless for me it looks like a dslr. Mirrorless should be small & less in weight . No meaning
No, mirrorless does NOT mean small, it means without a mirror, so there's an electronic viewfinder and full-time live view. A DSLR has an optical viewfinder and a mirror which, fo a camera with this size sensor, would be about 50% bigger still.
@@cameralabs thank you very much
As a painter I would like to pride myself on my appreciation of colour, yet I find the film simulations on my XT3 all but useless. The only one's at all useable are Provia and Pro Negative Standard. All the rest are eccentric gimmicks. As for the celebrated Acros, it is identical to any black and white photograph that has been underexposed by a third of a stop. As a Fuji owner I am baffled by all the mythologising this brand encourages.
Each to their own! It's a personal choice.
But can it make you lunch and fetch the beer
It grilled me a rather good toasted sandwich just before leaving...
Fuijfilm... The best of the best!
It is an amazing camera...
It’s a shame they came up with a top LCD display that looks prehistoric compared to its rivals.
It is a 5 years old sensor in it, right.
I don't think anyone had a 100mp sensor with PDAF five years ago, but show me the specs for it and we can compare.
Can the new Sony a7RM4 compare for a fraction of the price?
Certainly not in terms of image quality.
One can compare anything.
Well, I have samples from both cameras at cameralabs.com so have a look and see what you think!
Great review as usual, but wish you slowww down and relaaaaaaaaaxxx juts a little :)
I was excited to have this camera!
Great camera, but super heavy!
$1 shipping
With a sony sensor
Probably, but then Sony manufactures sensors for almost everyone.
@@cameralabs Sony IMX 461 sensor
Ferrari at least hold its price pretty nicely, or even shoot up in value. This photo beast must be hard to sell after few years.
That wasn't the point being made. The point was, this camera might be out of the price range of most people buying a camera, but it's still interesting to admire and check it out.
I disagree...I would pick one for half the price or less and quickly too...even 10 year later I would buy one...
This camera is bigger than what it is. The VF should be integrated so it does not take the hot shoe. For now it is overprice and need to be design better.
At least it's not a Leica ;D
God this is an ugly looking camera !!!
$10K?... what a scam.👎🏼
How so?