You are correct, but i find it very suspicious... By this i mean instead pf giving us a good old game that was a big game in the franchise, they might just be forgetting about it and blowing the money on the worthless infinite warfare ( my opinion, im aware a small majority actually like the game)
De-Preorder it then >:c... CoD is a wealthy series- there's no excuse. Absolutely no excuse of why they couldn't do a better game than Infinite Warfare.
Grant Davis I also pre-ordered that too, just only brought up the bf1 one because that guy asked me to buy it, even though I'm actually hyped for both games
great comparasion btw, good news is there will be modern warfare remastered, and the bad news is we need to buy infinite warfare to get modern warfare remastered
+Gaming Wimp Since I have no interest in the MP and no way in hell I would buy Infinity Warshit... Activision using shirty tactics to sell the game I will use my own shitty tactics to play it for free simple as that
+Faizan Ali Okay. Why the fuck does the new trailer have a different angle to break the aesthetic and then after knowing its garbage show it to people?
+Maverick Gamer BBB Compare COD 4's remastering with Uncharted 1's remastering, both of which originally came out in 2007, and then tell me which one looks shit for a next-gen game.
For the close up shots of faces, the newer looks better, but in most of the shots, original looks better. It doesn't have all that cinematic feel to it, and the Lighting looks more realistic and crisp. Basically the original looks more sharp and defined than the newer that gets by with blurring techniques. Like with Zakheav's close up, he looks like shit with the polygons, bit the background looks detailed as fuck, but in the newer, the background looks dull and bad with the depth of field. pros and cons. Original: -Pros: No blurring, lighting, models look crisp and defined at a normal distance, lighting interacts with models nicely giving it a more defined look, can't beat the classics. -Cons: Polygons highly noticeable, close ups look bad, foliage looks good at a distance but closeup is just scrambled images of IRL foliage. Newer: -Pros: Graphics updated, closeups look better, Rain interacts with Models and environments nicely -Cons: Too much blurring, lighting is pretty bad in many areas, Scenery is damaged by Depth of Field, Models don't look defined from a distance, foliage isn't an improvement, in fact it might be worst as they didn't render images to use as Foliage Textures. Here are references so you see what I am talking about: 00:35 This is where the new one uses depth of field to its advantage. With Depth of field, plus the cigar smoke, most of the ship is covered. The newer has lights added into the ship to add detail hidden by DoF. Rain interacts with the models, plus the lighting give it a more advanced look than the original. The original, however, has a different approach. No DoF, so the bottom of the ship looks unnatural and just pasted on. However, with it's exaggerated use of lightning, it makes everything pop out more. The ship crates and models have a horror feel to it, and makes everything look bright, as expected in a light scarce, open environment. The models aren't affected by rain, so it doesn't look as realistic, but because of that, the rope, soldiers, and even cigar are more defined. 1:00 One of the closeups compared. The background in the original isn't affected by DoF, making it more detailed than the newer. The original model of Zakheav looks fake and plastic. The lighting works good here for the background, but the Model doesn't help. But the newer one has different problems. Although it might look more detailed, the poor lighting on it makes it look dull and flat. look at the nose, and you'll see what I mean. Where the original looked plastic and fake, it at least had depth to it. The newer looks like an unfinished painting that got dropped at the shading process. 1:44: Soldiers in the original are much more detailed with the lighting making them look defined. The wall behind them uses a brick texture that, combined with the lighting, makes it look like it is 3d, when it is actually a flat image. Door had more detail. In the newer, the soldiers look bland and dull as their edges look blurred. The lighting looks like it was done over with Airbrush, giving it a flat, dull look. Wall is blank with a few signs of damage to give it the illusion of detail, and the door is similar to the original, but not as defined. There is a lot more, but it's up for you to decide.
Lol the lighting has had a major improvement. In case you havent noticed, natural light in real life is quite the opposite of sharp. Shadows are quite often really soft, rarely are they ever hard and dark. The original lighting was just off. And nice depth of field ISNT a bad thing when used in the right areas to do what its meant to, i.e in cutscenes. Its a tool that adds focus, and a realistic effect if its being seen through any sort of lens. Look at the new doom for example, it took advantage of DOF really well
Cameron Teeple There are soft and hard shadows, the most common you'll find is hard shadows. soft shadows are seen in objects such as leaves, or any translucent object. Hard shadows with the sun as a light source is not something you'll see very often. Soft Shadows are an effect recreated through flashlights for an impactful image. Soft Shadows render more easily than Hard shadows because it can easily be recreated through cheap methods such as fade, but the original Cod4, despite it's technology, still went on to make it. Which is why GTA 5 was not able to add it into the game until PC as an option. So already, Cod4 is using features superior than the new one. DoF is existant in real life, but the original Cod4 decided to only add it when ADSing weapons, as they wanted to showcase the power of the new technology. They wanted to show off how everything looked in comparison to the CoDs before it. Cities were very hard to model for PS2 and XBOX, and buildings could only be made if they were simple 3d models with images on the sides. But CoD 4 went full balls to the wall with the objective to show off. The indents in walls, brick texture, everything was made with that purpose. CoD 4 had the technology to use DoF, as it's pretty simple to code compared to other visual effects in the game. Using it in the new CoD 4 isn't really revolutionary, and if they cut back on it, it would be really great on their part to show off the background and improvements made. The new CoD 4 is nothing more than a bribe to buying Infinite Warfare. They use cheap visual effects to take the easy was around, making the newer version much, much less impressive than the older one.
TheDougieFresh I wouldn't call a massive increase in polys and much improved materials "cheap visual effects", it does its job as a remaster. Although the visuals are a bit generic relative to today's standards, its still heaps better than the original. They went for a more accurate lighting approach in this one, just because rendering soft shadows is less intensive, that doesn't deny the fact that it is just more accurate. Hard Shadows don't exist in the real world, and soft shadows just makes more sense. And yes, DOF was available at the time, in its most primitive form, to add focus to the point of interest (i.e. Aiming Down Sights), but the remaster has used DOF for more than a game play mechanic, and included it as a cinematic tool to use, in what we've only seen in cut scenes. But I will agree that the idea of having to buy the game with Infinite Warfare is extremely anti-consumer.
Cameron Teeple Soft shadows in every entity isn't realistic. It's a cheap and easy way to add visuals into a game, which is why it was used in the original GTA 5, and changed to Hard Shadows in the upgraded versions of the game. If you go out in the middle of the day, you will rarely see soft shadows unless it's from leaves, or wire fences, other than that, the shadows are hard. The purpose of the game was to make it look as good as possible, but in doing so, a lot of visuals the original did better. A brick wall texture in the original where it would actually pop out, is reduced to a mere flat wall with a crack in it, and the door looks flat in the remake, compared to the original. The remake is simply to upgrade the models, not the scenery, and this video proves that.
That's all I could think about the whole lol, I could barely focus on the comparison cuz of how nostalgic I felt from the music and seeing the old stuff.
goobiehoobie They remastered it quickly to help sell Infinite warfare. Without cod4, Infinite warfare would have failed miserably, considering it's releasing close to Battlefield 1.
just bring it back as dlc or make some kind of collectors edition which only cost 279 $ .. They will find a lot of youtuber who would advertise this shit.
We compare the graphics of Call of Duty Modern Warfare Original on PC with the remastered version - shots are taken from official E3 2016 trailer, announcement trailer and official E3 2016 screenshots. The original version is played on PC with maximum graphics settings at 1080p resolution. If you like our work, please give this video a thumbs up & subscribe :) Want to give additional feedback? Go here: Candyland on Facebook: facebook.com/candylandGS Candyland on Twitter: twitter.com/CandylandGS
You do realise that comparing trailer that no doubt has been post-processed for even better looks and with loose of some quality due image compression in videos is not too smart?
This is my opinion. But when HALO Combat Evolved got remastered, it was actually good. This looks pretty much the same to the original with tiny graphic improvements. It is still a good game nonetheless, but I don't really see the point of remastering it, since the original COD4 had a classic feel to it.
IK (Inverse Kinematics) wasn't used. Fingers weren't looked at separately and placed on the object. It was just a pose "Put hands like this, now put gun here"
Ya, funny how only that one comparison looks hugely different. It very well could be MW4 in game footage vs MW4 remastered FMV footage. And it honestly does look like video and not in-game. The rest of it, hard to tell with the fact that most scenes are blurry or covered in a fog like substance, though the original is clear as day and not trying to hide anything.
Well you can't really compare them because one is pretty much a decade old. If you take the technology available at the year of their makings into account, the original would be the winner in a landslide. ^some of those people who responded to you have no idea how fucking bad ass cod4 looked for its era. It was a game changer and the graphics were sexy as hell. COD 4 graphics aren't that off from modern game graphics, it's pretty much playing a game on low settings, but is fun as hell to play and has a rich story. I'm really saddened at the route cod has taken ever since. Now the series is pretty much just a money milking machine. BO3 campaign doesn't even continue from the last Black Ops. Black Ops 1 was my favorite game besides cod4. I miss good cod storytelling :(
Ugh... keep the commando, infite supply of noobtube, deathstreaks, random spawnpoints, identical weapons, akimbo 1887, and more fucking crap to yourselves and let us enjoy a good CoD game...
+Mr. LightBulb The original wall was brick (probably cinderblock) and the new one is stucco with a few chipped pieces. I noticed it, too, but it's simply a different texture map mimicking a different type of wall finish.
I think you're saying that mainly because of the wall behind them, where one is made of brick layering, so more apparent visual detail for a still image, while the other is just flat, but I think the remaster is perhaps more realistic.
It just looks that way because the lighting is much more, idk, distributed? Like, it's basically everywhere so there isn't as much as a lighting/shadowy effect as the original, and the wall went from being brick to being a more flat, mud or plastery kinda surface, which makes it look like it is missing a bit more detail than it really is, but upon closer inspection of the individual textures and comparing them, especially things like the M4's and the soldier's equipment, you'll see where the upgrades were made for sure.
Imagine this game with Battlefield's Frostbite Engine! Damn.. I mean this games looks good, but it doesn't come close to look as good as Battlefield 1.
in the end, its not all about looks. a game can look gorgeous and run at 60 frames but if it's shit gameplay and replay value, then it defeats the purpose of a good looking title.
which one looks more *realistic* you fucktard just cause the original didnt have lens blur doesnt make the original better.. remestarted haves dof in it making it more realistic orignal didnt
+BroHunters Cause the type of engine they have been using for most of the games....... they moved the game to a new engine, which now can support more graphics settings for Xbox
The original looks better. The new one is more detailed in some places but there's all these lighting and fog effects that make it look worse than the old.
I don't - It doesn't help the picture from the trailer is out of focus or blurry. However when I look at both the images, the original I can definitely tell it's a video game the remastered not so much. I also can tell the other has more advanced atmosphere effects going on the remastered version. It is also a still, but when you see the final product in motion I think the difference will be quite clear. Not to mention, the remastered game is still a work in progress.
+gameghost2010 what he ^ said lol I was mostly referring to the two Marines specifically, not the textures and details in the environment. And yes, the lighting is more natural. Still, in my honest opinion, the remaster is no work of art. For a game set to be released in 2016, it honestly looks a little dated to me and it hasn't even come out yet.
+OkamI No one's gonna buy the game used for 65$. 40 maybe, but I'm sure most who actually are interested in Infinite Warfare will have pre-ordered it already.
***** Because maybe, I don't know, I can't be bothered to pay for their new piece of shit space game, but I do want the MW1 remaster. That's why people are rightfully pissed off.
OkamI For all we know the CoD4 remaster needs the IW disc to work though. Has it been officially announced that CoD4 will be a code? Or part of Infinite Warfare?
+Ty Schmidt you just don't fucking understand people's feelings you bigot fuckhead, do ya? That fucking wall there was the pinnacle of the whole Call of Duty Modern Warfare game which inspired millions and Infinite Ward fucking ruined it with a plain plaster wall instead of its marvelous bone-white brick wall texture which won the hearts and minds of gamers everywhere. It's a tragic display of hypocrisy and neglect by the developers who claim to have gone back to the series' roots.
I'm not so sure about the door breach comparison. The chipped wall textures in the remaster look fantastic, but they'll need to spread those across the whole wall, not just the edge. If they do that properly, it'll definitely look better than the repetitive brick texture which lacks character
Nathan uncharted Drake Videos Yeah, they've really been stretching the engine. Hopefully they'll upgrade it after the second wave of new gen games. I doubt it because saying there's a new game engine would only appeal to so many people, but it's deserved after, like, 15 years of the same engine lol
+Noobert obviously we care about graphics becausw 2007 graphics are shit compared to now. if we didnt like the gameplay, we wouldnt want it remastered, you fucking knob.
Coreydoesvideos Actually, on the fourth mission of Modern Warfare 2, Private Allen of the C.I.A., goes undercover by the orders of General Shepard, to obtain information on him and his plans. There wasn't a gay bar that I've noticed in the game.
It will be made available separately shortly after the release. Many gamer's aren't buying Infinite Warfare in protest against Activisions shitty business decision to combine them. It is projected that the sales for Infinite Warfare are going to be worst in COD history by a huge margin
Enlightened Tha THIRD Well I never played Battlefield 2142, but from what everyone says, it's a great game and i would love to play it, but i hate when companies try to milk their customers. Such as the fucking supply drops and all that other bullshit. In a different video i saw someone said the futuristic setting COD's were more successful, and i replied that they are only successful because of the supply drops. The few people that bought their future game put all their money into supply drops. I apologize for my rant.
daemondawg I agree. Level boosting micro-transactions should be banned from multiplayer. It ruins the balance and makes the game less enjoyable/rewarding for people who actually make an effort
This is kind of disappointing considering how this is a cutscene and the halo 2 part of master chief collection had far superior cutscenes and graphics compared to original halo 2
The Halo 2 MC Collection's cutscenes were entirely redone by Blur Studio, and they are incredible at hyper-true-to-life realistic effects, go check out the Blur Studio Animation reel or watch their Star Wars Old Republic trailers to see. The CoD 4 remaster is being done by Activision's Raven Software, and their focus will be different. Their focus for this game is of course on gameplay graphics, which in this case are going to be the same as cutscene graphics because CoD 4's cutscenes were all rendered in-engine in real time, not pre-rendered like the gorgeous Halo 2 remastered cutscenes. That's why you never had that "why do the cutscenes look so much better than when I'm playing?" feeling from Cod 4
+edawg792 oh true, I reckon it would've been cooler though if they hired blur studios for the cutscenes, I've heard the campaign has some pretty good cinematic moments
SparkyBoy Yeah it would definitely look soooo good. But it would also break immersion, like how in CoD 4 the cutscenes were always seamless with gameplay because they basically WERE gameplay, only difference is your movement is controlled (but you could always still look around). But I'll be honest I'd rather see Blur's take on those cutscenes just because they'd look so cool lol.
Nope get your eyes checked, honestly stop being one of those fucking idiots who say "Is it me or is the orignal better guys he he?" The answer is no the remaster is better in all ways, the reason some times it looks weird is because of the trailer affects.
CashKes actualy it's not my first time. Activision don't have any more imagination to make game that dont have jetpacks or wallruns, futuristic shit. and if they make one. it will be TDM, KC game... Battlefield is much much much more like wargame...
This was one of the best games in cod history what did you expect? IW may turn out to be good but it will never be better than it's grandpa. the same with other games too.
people just like to jump on the hate train because when the trailer started, no one knew it was cod until he either pulled out his weapon or the title was shown then. people were saying what game is this, it looks pretty good, and as soon they found out it was cod, the instantly started talking trash.. that's lame as f. and I don't even like cod.
Does anybody else get the chills when you hear that music start up? Too many great memories with that game. So many nights of staying up with all of your friends. A golden era.....
lol... xD i am sure they "don't have the money" to buy the licence for a modern engine. This could be the only reason why are they stuck on updating this shit. Well its not shit because it was a good thing in the 20th century.
Its started from the first CoD in 2003 and they picked the idtech3 engine from the 90s. And they just continued with it modifying and upgrading the same thing over and over again. On this link you can see some real history. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IW_engine Every cod game and even quake3 or jedi academy has the same bugs on limited 125, 250, 333 or 1000fps because of the shit basic engine the idtech3.
Ask activision, treyarch and infinity ward. You wont get an answer. I don't know if anyone can answer this... It would be fixed i'm sure if they would know ow this happens. But under 2 decades the fix did not happen so it's an extra for an overpriced rework of a reworked rework.
*This game alone could stand against Battlefield. People who never touched COD 4 can't talk about it. It's wonderful. Unfortunately, I won't be fuck*d by Activision and there's is no way I'm buying Infinite Dislikes.*
+Mr Savage didn't ubisoft sign some contract this year that the trailer or demo shown at e3 must represent the final game. Or u know the final game can look better.
We have a new video with HQ trailer material from the mission Crew Expandable (1080p60 @37Mbit!!!) so please go here: ua-cam.com/video/zTqKagN8NpQ/v-deo.html
***** trust me any noob can go on youtube search a adobe after effects tutorial and do it himself it only takes few hours and practice then you can get extreme good effects on every video its not hard and when you study stuff like that it will be even easier Simple Way : Put Contrast : High Put Gamma : Down Put Saturation : High Put some effects into it like : lens Flare Hot Colers and all that shit and wolla you got an even better looking Picture/Video then that trailer :)
Same mw2 disappointed me so badly that they've made me to stop buying CoD games and went back to CoD 4,WaW was awesome but the rest felt all the same even the futuristic ones and I had the chance to play all the newer releases luckily I haven't bought them I would have felt scammed by the developers.Look at IW how few weapons there are and the DLCs...I know Battlefield fans who say Battlefield DLcs are a scamm because they're releasing half game and I don't see it like that 100%(They exist since BF1942 and are jsut expansions now they feel like because almost everygame developer is doing it they feel also scammed by BF developers, must admit BF premium at the price of 50 is also a bit too much It's like the price of the game) If we look at COD DLCs these are a real scamm
COD 4 is admired because of its compelling story and great characters. From what I've seen so far, it seems that the remaster is trying to tell the story with a more cinematic feel, hence the blurring of backgrounds and huge increase of environmental effects like smoke and haze. The detail added to the jetty at 1:17 (posts going into the water) are the sort of additions we'll see plenty of. Also, you must be blind if you can't tell the difference in Zakhaev's face at 1:02 :P
COD MW is really greate,butremaster is made only to make infinte warfare solds bigger,cause u can't buy onky MW remaster,you must buy infinite warfare to get it
It's the same fucking game. What on gods green earth are people thinking when they decide they want to pay for a game they've already got? You do realise this is what games are going to be from here on out now? Re-releases of everything 5 years down the line because it's kids who get excited and buy the games. Well done everyone.
+Isaac Jimenez Cod 4 for ps4 is the same game as the one for the ps3. It just looks prettier for the ps4. The Master Chief Collection is a smart idea. 4 games for the price of one. $80 minimum for just cod4 remastered and IW is not a smart decision.
+Isaac Jimenez That's true. but what's not smart is that people will just buy IW becouse they want cod 4 REMASTERED. even though they talk shit about IW. but then that just fuels the cod flames and thus not getting any change.
I'm also used to the original game. Sometimes character models change in instances like this, but I don't any difference here. They look fundamentally identical
D. Fortner Yea, it's a dirty way of making up for the loss in sales for Infinite Warfare since there's such a huge hate bandwagon atm for the franchise. I'll either wait for the Modern Warfare Remaster to be released separately, to go on sale at 50% off
Stop with this bs in the comments, guys. The Remastered version looks way better than the original in every screenshot. With COD4 we actually reached the point that not only EACH new COD has to be worse than it, but even a Remastered must be considered shit just because of some nostalgic idiots.
Pause at 1:49 Game looks rushed a little. They added too much blur so they didn't have to work on details. Il stick to my gaming rig and play the old one maxed out lol
They'll fine tune the details when they release a Modern Warfare Remastered collection. That way the bundle will look better than the individual games they release slowly over the next few years making the bundle have more overall value than the single games.
You should watch the official trailer on CoD's channel, this guy used shitty Lightshot screenshots for this video. Notice when he used one clip from the Prologue mission, the graphics were beautiful, but as soon as he went back to using screnshots he got himself, it was shit.
the older game actually looked better in many ways. it utilised greys and dark colours better, shadows were darker, the colour was less exaggerated. its this new console generation. they have so much colour to incorporate well into their graphics but they overdo it and lose the focus. get back to making games for the game, guys.
That is the problem with trailers. They are too deceiving and always look better than the actual games. it's called Pre-Baked cinematics when it comes to trailers. I do believe though the call of duty 4 remaster trailer is legitimate gameplay graphics but it is too shiny in my opinion to be considered realistic looking.
Call of Duty 4 was one of the best games of all time. Such a fucking masterpiece.
That grammar is terrible
Azerrz!!!
See COD 4 wasn't that amazing, I think the original 3 were quite good, amazing even, and what about black ops 1
Nope
Azazer, yes
90% of the graphics went into Captain Price's cigar xD
On the original
*See's Infinite warfare required to get Modern Warfare*
Price: WE ARE LEAVING.
LOL
King Karcha Iw isnt actually that bad
Why did you just like your own comment? Probably because no one will agree with you lol...
The Iron Warrior ?
The Iron Warrior I didint. i can Send you a screen shot if you dont believe pal 😂
Is it just me or does the original look better sometimes?
it does lol
That was probably an editing mistake.
It's probably because it's just a trailer. Once you actually get the remastered version you'll definitely notice the difference.
You're correct. Some scenes look worse in the remastered specifically the desert storm gameplay.
You are correct, but i find it very suspicious... By this i mean instead pf giving us a good old game that was a big game in the franchise, they might just be forgetting about it and blowing the money on the worthless infinite warfare ( my opinion, im aware a small majority actually like the game)
-buy infinite warfare with mw4
-install mw4
-sell infinite warfare
-buy battlefield 1
Good plan there
Impossible to sell if warfare
Serhat Seker sell it to new players lol
I think you can get mw in xbox store online
You can't it's all on the same disk lmao
I heard that you buy COD4 remastered and get infinite warfare for free
Other way around
You guys don't get the joke
HOLY SHiT! iTz A DUMBASS!
+Thomas Daka lol there's another joke
nope
I would ask that everyone hold off on buying Infinite Warfare until they separate the two games apart.
that'll take months or even some years
+Darakung kearYT just buy BF1 instead
Andrew Simm_9N3 I already pre-ordered it
De-Preorder it then >:c... CoD is a wealthy series- there's no excuse. Absolutely no excuse of why they couldn't do a better game than Infinite Warfare.
Grant Davis I also pre-ordered that too, just only brought up the bf1 one because that guy asked me to buy it, even though I'm actually hyped for both games
At 1:49 I like original better loo
Lol***********
same
Same
Omg original looks more realistic and detailed
I thought I was the only one that thought it was better!
great comparasion btw, good news is there will be modern warfare remastered, and the bad news is we need to buy infinite warfare to get modern warfare remastered
Thanks a lot, was a hell of a work ;)
some people make petition for cod 4 modern warfare not bundle with cod infinie warfare art for my bad english)
sorry for my bad english
You dont know if IW is trash if you havent played it yet
and you only get 10 maps :-) rip cod, btw this is a faketrailer graphic and has nothing to do with in game graphics just a rendertrailer haha
Apparently your character won't have guns in the new remastered.
LOL you made my week
lol
actual gameplay is being compared to a TRAILER lol
+Uncle Hunty you're so smart
Michael Cantu You've only seen the smartass side. The file cabinet labeled "Stupid Things I Have Done" is overflowing with little gems of stupidity
Seriously? Everyone is conplaining cuz the graphics...BUT ALL I WANT IS FREAKING NEW SERVERS WITHOUT LAG OR HACKERS
Never gonna end
I want a new campaign(
+Вячеслав Подмосков back in the day I only played campaign so I like it
i agree. the multiplayer wont be hacked or modded. i cant enjoy my experience in last gen.
I just want to see ghost again.
I remember back in the day COD 4 looked realistic as fuck to me and now it looks like shit graphically speaking. lol
Nah the original isn't that bad
I thought WAW was ultra-realistic graphics.
I thought BF3 campaign was realistic with the regular AV cables but not anymore
Jon Prz lmao same then I got an HD tv and everything became so much more apparent.
John Manzuki Oh my
look at that delicious Torrent File...
Lmao bro
+Gaming Wimp Since I have no interest in the MP and no way in hell I would buy Infinity Warshit... Activision using shirty tactics to sell the game I will use my own shitty tactics to play it for free simple as that
+kodemasterx LOL
torrent is thr answer
denuvo
Why does the original look better in some scenes? xD
because it's Activision
+Faizan Ali Okay. Why the fuck does the new trailer have a different angle to break the aesthetic and then after knowing its garbage show it to people?
nein
Activision actually tried
+Faizan Ali look at the textures on the soldiers on the breach in the remastered version. They look awful
looks like they spent more time on this then infinite warfare
Another company worked on it, raven to be exact
beenox*
not about graphic ... IW graphics look crazy... but...still won't buy it
@@nerboy9334 hello
Looks like Cpt. Price fighting some DOOM demons on that Thumbnail...
That or he was taking a massive hellish dump or something.
Witcher Lol
lol
***** Plot twist found! 😮 but but he was a good guy he deserves heaven not hell! Unless he got dragged for all his killing duties.. 😧
Lmao
Damn that's one hell of an upgrade
good but shit for next gen
+Maverick Gamer BBB Compare COD 4's remastering with Uncharted 1's remastering, both of which originally came out in 2007, and then tell me which one looks shit for a next-gen game.
calling nex gen consoles that released in 2013 and soon to be replaced with new versions
+SicParvisMagna123 uncharted remaster was minor this is like meant to be a really big remaster if u know what i mean
+Gokhan Gamer exactly
I remember when I thought cod 4 had good graphics
I can't remember cod 4 without promod.
for its age it sure does
I can remember when cod was good, the good ol days of no jet packs and laser guns
+Bradley Williams true that's why I'm going to battlefield sorry cod you have to many issues
Sorry but Escape from Tarkov will top both of them lol, easily...
For the close up shots of faces, the newer looks better, but in most of the shots, original looks better. It doesn't have all that cinematic feel to it, and the Lighting looks more realistic and crisp. Basically the original looks more sharp and defined than the newer that gets by with blurring techniques. Like with Zakheav's close up, he looks like shit with the polygons, bit the background looks detailed as fuck, but in the newer, the background looks dull and bad with the depth of field. pros and cons.
Original:
-Pros: No blurring, lighting, models look crisp and defined at a normal distance, lighting interacts with models nicely giving it a more defined look, can't beat the classics.
-Cons: Polygons highly noticeable, close ups look bad, foliage looks good at a distance but closeup is just scrambled images of IRL foliage.
Newer:
-Pros: Graphics updated, closeups look better, Rain interacts with Models and environments nicely
-Cons: Too much blurring, lighting is pretty bad in many areas, Scenery is damaged by Depth of Field, Models don't look defined from a distance, foliage isn't an improvement, in fact it might be worst as they didn't render images to use as Foliage Textures.
Here are references so you see what I am talking about:
00:35 This is where the new one uses depth of field to its advantage. With Depth of field, plus the cigar smoke, most of the ship is covered. The newer has lights added into the ship to add detail hidden by DoF. Rain interacts with the models, plus the lighting give it a more advanced look than the original. The original, however, has a different approach. No DoF, so the bottom of the ship looks unnatural and just pasted on. However, with it's exaggerated use of lightning, it makes everything pop out more. The ship crates and models have a horror feel to it, and makes everything look bright, as expected in a light scarce, open environment. The models aren't affected by rain, so it doesn't look as realistic, but because of that, the rope, soldiers, and even cigar are more defined.
1:00 One of the closeups compared. The background in the original isn't affected by DoF, making it more detailed than the newer. The original model of Zakheav looks fake and plastic. The lighting works good here for the background, but the Model doesn't help. But the newer one has different problems. Although it might look more detailed, the poor lighting on it makes it look dull and flat. look at the nose, and you'll see what I mean. Where the original looked plastic and fake, it at least had depth to it. The newer looks like an unfinished painting that got dropped at the shading process.
1:44: Soldiers in the original are much more detailed with the lighting making them look defined. The wall behind them uses a brick texture that, combined with the lighting, makes it look like it is 3d, when it is actually a flat image. Door had more detail. In the newer, the soldiers look bland and dull as their edges look blurred. The lighting looks like it was done over with Airbrush, giving it a flat, dull look. Wall is blank with a few signs of damage to give it the illusion of detail, and the door is similar to the original, but not as defined.
There is a lot more, but it's up for you to decide.
I didn't know how to voice my concerns, but you seemed to be able to handle that yourself. Good eye
Lol the lighting has had a major improvement. In case you havent noticed, natural light in real life is quite the opposite of sharp. Shadows are quite often really soft, rarely are they ever hard and dark. The original lighting was just off. And nice depth of field ISNT a bad thing when used in the right areas to do what its meant to, i.e in cutscenes. Its a tool that adds focus, and a realistic effect if its being seen through any sort of lens. Look at the new doom for example, it took advantage of DOF really well
Cameron Teeple There are soft and hard shadows, the most common you'll find is hard shadows. soft shadows are seen in objects such as leaves, or any translucent object. Hard shadows with the sun as a light source is not something you'll see very often. Soft Shadows are an effect recreated through flashlights for an impactful image. Soft Shadows render more easily than Hard shadows because it can easily be recreated through cheap methods such as fade, but the original Cod4, despite it's technology, still went on to make it. Which is why GTA 5 was not able to add it into the game until PC as an option. So already, Cod4 is using features superior than the new one. DoF is existant in real life, but the original Cod4 decided to only add it when ADSing weapons, as they wanted to showcase the power of the new technology. They wanted to show off how everything looked in comparison to the CoDs before it. Cities were very hard to model for PS2 and XBOX, and buildings could only be made if they were simple 3d models with images on the sides. But CoD 4 went full balls to the wall with the objective to show off. The indents in walls, brick texture, everything was made with that purpose. CoD 4 had the technology to use DoF, as it's pretty simple to code compared to other visual effects in the game. Using it in the new CoD 4 isn't really revolutionary, and if they cut back on it, it would be really great on their part to show off the background and improvements made. The new CoD 4 is nothing more than a bribe to buying Infinite Warfare. They use cheap visual effects to take the easy was around, making the newer version much, much less impressive than the older one.
TheDougieFresh I wouldn't call a massive increase in polys and much improved materials "cheap visual effects", it does its job as a remaster. Although the visuals are a bit generic relative to today's standards, its still heaps better than the original. They went for a more accurate lighting approach in this one, just because rendering soft shadows is less intensive, that doesn't deny the fact that it is just more accurate. Hard Shadows don't exist in the real world, and soft shadows just makes more sense. And yes, DOF was available at the time, in its most primitive form, to add focus to the point of interest (i.e. Aiming Down Sights), but the remaster has used DOF for more than a game play mechanic, and included it as a cinematic tool to use, in what we've only seen in cut scenes. But I will agree that the idea of having to buy the game with Infinite Warfare is extremely anti-consumer.
Cameron Teeple Soft shadows in every entity isn't realistic. It's a cheap and easy way to add visuals into a game, which is why it was used in the original GTA 5, and changed to Hard Shadows in the upgraded versions of the game. If you go out in the middle of the day, you will rarely see soft shadows unless it's from leaves, or wire fences, other than that, the shadows are hard. The purpose of the game was to make it look as good as possible, but in doing so, a lot of visuals the original did better. A brick wall texture in the original where it would actually pop out, is reduced to a mere flat wall with a crack in it, and the door looks flat in the remake, compared to the original. The remake is simply to upgrade the models, not the scenery, and this video proves that.
Even the menu music is nostalgic. Such a shame this isn't a stand alone,
It's not standalone because they know people won't buy IW, they'll just buy COD4 Remastered. If it was a stand alone.
+dirtasirt oh I know this well. It'll be locked into the game much like zombies in last titles
* past
That's all I could think about the whole lol, I could barely focus on the comparison cuz of how nostalgic I felt from the music and seeing the old stuff.
well think of it this way. You buy Modern Warfare and get Infinite Warfare for free
Fog + Blur + DOF= REMASTERED. Clowns...
Take a seat.
Take a sit
take a shit
i see improved geometry, shader and texture too.
improved anti aliasing and fancy filters = cod4 remastered
Not that big of a difference. The original still looks amazing.
I actually prefer the original in some screenshots!
Who would you offend?
I thought they should have waited a 4-5 more years before they do the remaster.
to me the remaster still looks outdated graphically
+WATZ UP i think they just increased the res on everything with some better lighting. lol.
goobiehoobie They remastered it quickly to help sell Infinite warfare. Without cod4, Infinite warfare would have failed miserably, considering it's releasing close to Battlefield 1.
The next one should just be mw2 remastered
That would bring back so many fans
just bring it back as dlc or make some kind of collectors edition which only cost 279 $ .. They will find a lot of youtuber who would advertise this shit.
I miss the original cod I hate blackops. Where The Fuck Is Price and Soap?
i played mw2 on pc and the graphics are on point. the only thing that could get better are the slow mo moments and effects
Wait for 2019 and we'll see. We can hope
We compare the graphics of Call of Duty Modern Warfare Original on PC with the remastered version - shots are taken from official E3 2016 trailer, announcement trailer and official E3 2016 screenshots. The original version is played on PC with maximum graphics settings at 1080p resolution.
If you like our work, please give this video a thumbs up & subscribe :) Want to give additional feedback? Go here:
Candyland on Facebook: facebook.com/candylandGS
Candyland on Twitter: twitter.com/CandylandGS
Fuck you...
awesome stuff man nice video. Cod MW has improved in graphics alot
You do realise that comparing trailer that no doubt has been post-processed for even better looks and with loose of some quality due image compression in videos is not too smart?
man, if they remastered mw2 I'd never come back out of my room....
Deviloframadi64 they did
Soooo?
They did now don’t go visit your homies and sit down play the campaign
@@gardenofnightmare i finally came out of my room. so what happened and what is this covid stuff?
imagine WAW Remastered instead? :0
original looks better at 1:50
lol no
+refik mehmeti Yes it does. The lighting is more realistic and the textures are more detailed in that shot.
I agree, i was just looking at that just now then scrolled down to see your comment.
The remastered is better then the original
Don't get me ring I'm fucking hyped for this but is it just me that thinks some parts look better in the original than the remastered?
what do you mean when you wrote dont get me ring for this lol
This is my opinion. But when HALO Combat Evolved got remastered, it was actually good. This looks pretty much the same to the original with tiny graphic improvements. It is still a good game nonetheless, but I don't really see the point of remastering it, since the original COD4 had a classic feel to it.
+john smith wrong* sorry ;)
just messing around dude no worries
+john smith lol
3:11 this is going to haunt me forever
Only if we didnt have to buy Infinite warfare!
u mean the new halo ?
+Oyun Yorumcusu Hahaha aynen
dont you mean Mass Effect 4 ?
dont you mean shit :D
+Gary Sim hahaha
1:32 did anyone notice the hand went through the grenade launcher
I did
Yeah lol
LOL!!
Thats why it's called "Remastered" dumbass.
IK (Inverse Kinematics) wasn't used.
Fingers weren't looked at separately and placed on the object. It was just a pose "Put hands like this, now put gun here"
I`d pirate that remastered version
I agree
You wont see remastered multiplayer maps.
I will pirate it for the singleplayer. If it becomes Standalone, I will buy it. But I'll never waste money on their infinite scamfare
Too bad it'll probably have denuvo
yep
Nice comparison....TBH I still think the original looks freaking awesome.
no it doesn't. look at the compare to captain price :P
Ya, funny how only that one comparison looks hugely different. It very well could be MW4 in game footage vs MW4 remastered FMV footage. And it honestly does look like video and not in-game. The rest of it, hard to tell with the fact that most scenes are blurry or covered in a fog like substance, though the original is clear as day and not trying to hide anything.
both look terrible
+WATZ UP shut up
Well you can't really compare them because one is pretty much a decade old. If you take the technology available at the year of their makings into account, the original would be the winner in a landslide. ^some of those people who responded to you have no idea how fucking bad ass cod4 looked for its era. It was a game changer and the graphics were sexy as hell. COD 4 graphics aren't that off from modern game graphics, it's pretty much playing a game on low settings, but is fun as hell to play and has a rich story. I'm really saddened at the route cod has taken ever since. Now the series is pretty much just a money milking machine. BO3 campaign doesn't even continue from the last Black Ops. Black Ops 1 was my favorite game besides cod4. I miss good cod storytelling :(
This means nothing. Most trailers use graphic quality not available on the real game.
Gey
Yes, that really pissed me off
like league of legends
Like Ubisoft
+Flag, The Courier watch dogs lol
Imagine if we got Modern Warfare 2 Remasterd instead;)
That would actually be extremely great :}}}}
That would be heaven on earth!!
I prefer cod4
If they sold a MW2/MW remastered bundle instead of IW/MW I would definitely buy it.
Ugh... keep the commando, infite supply of noobtube, deathstreaks, random spawnpoints, identical weapons, akimbo 1887, and more fucking crap to yourselves and let us enjoy a good CoD game...
Like the nuke original and the two soldiers at 1:46 better. Sometimes lack of blur and dreary lighting really enhances the atmosphere
There was something up with the image at 1:46. The textures looked really strange. I think there was a blur effect or something.
+Mr. LightBulb The original wall was brick (probably cinderblock) and the new one is stucco with a few chipped pieces. I noticed it, too, but it's simply a different texture map mimicking a different type of wall finish.
I think you're saying that mainly because of the wall behind them, where one is made of brick layering, so more apparent visual detail for a still image, while the other is just flat, but I think the remaster is perhaps more realistic.
agree
original just looks better , whats the point in remastering this game when it clearly doesnt need it
This is why video game piracy is amazing
it's amazing until denuvo fuck things up
Until devs stop porting games to the PC because you're poor.
Mareșalul Alexandru Averescu.
I play on PC you shit. There's no reason to pirate when games on g2a are cheap.
+Mareșalul Alexandru Averescu. Well said. Take this w my good sir.
yeah :)))indeed:)))
1:47 original looks better
Thats what I tought too
it does? how?
meh i think the remastered looks better
not really, you think it does
+NonsensicalVids yes
Besides the 1:46 and the nuke, trailer is better
Exactly what I was thinking
when i saw 1:46 I thought, surely it must me mixed up, the one on the right looks like a massive downgrade.
+Hazo Graphically the mushroom cloud doesn't look worse, but it's definitely lost something of the CoD 4 aesthetic style we know and love
+Hazo The hazy gritty post-nuke atmosphere seems to have been lost
It just looks that way because the lighting is much more, idk, distributed? Like, it's basically everywhere so there isn't as much as a lighting/shadowy effect as the original, and the wall went from being brick to being a more flat, mud or plastery kinda surface, which makes it look like it is missing a bit more detail than it really is, but upon closer inspection of the individual textures and comparing them, especially things like the M4's and the soldier's equipment, you'll see where the upgrades were made for sure.
1:47 the original looks better at this moment.
Imagine this game with Battlefield's Frostbite Engine! Damn.. I mean this games looks good, but it doesn't come close to look as good as Battlefield 1.
in the end, its not all about looks. a game can look gorgeous and run at 60 frames but if it's shit gameplay and replay value, then it defeats the purpose of a good looking title.
Well
Literally every battlefield game with good graphics turned out to still be better than cod
Dude, nearly every CoD title since Modern Warfare plays the same ....
I mean, advanced warfare changed it a bit and peaple gotten mad
Fucking childrens
if thats the case i might as well just play the original cod4
1:49 WTF look at that textures. The original textures of the soldiers are much better
It's just blurred.
The textures are so much better dude, the fuck? people are so dumb so they think because there's no sun lightning that part looks bad.
Nathan uncharted Drake Videos ;)
which one looks more *realistic* you fucktard just cause the original didnt have lens blur doesnt make the original better.. remestarted haves dof in it making it more realistic orignal didnt
+BroHunters Cause the type of engine they have been using for most of the games....... they moved the game to a new engine, which now can support more graphics settings for Xbox
The original looks better. The new one is more detailed in some places but there's all these lighting and fog effects that make it look worse than the old.
Wat
0:42, 1:25, 1:45 -here the old graphics are more detailed, 2:54 -it looks like theres a dust storm happening in the new graphics
wh...wh...wh...what?
"technically speaking" Then why does it actually look worse in half the video?
+Niko Vasko Is there really a debate over this LOL R.I.P cod community
Can we just appreciate the fact that Captain Price looks like Nigel Thornberry?
at 1:47 am I the only one that prefers the originals look?
Defintely agree, the Marines look way better in the original.
Edwin Dubridge thought so too
I don't - It doesn't help the picture from the trailer is out of focus or blurry. However when I look at both the images, the original I can definitely tell it's a video game the remastered not so much. I also can tell the other has more advanced atmosphere effects going on the remastered version. It is also a still, but when you see the final product in motion I think the difference will be quite clear. Not to mention, the remastered game is still a work in progress.
gameghost2010 yes ofcourse man, my comment was based on that screenshot, rather then my interpretation of the final product
+gameghost2010 what he ^ said lol I was mostly referring to the two Marines specifically, not the textures and details in the environment. And yes, the lighting is more natural. Still, in my honest opinion, the remaster is no work of art. For a game set to be released in 2016, it honestly looks a little dated to me and it hasn't even come out yet.
All aren't extreme upgrades. Until Price's face showed up
Price has Nigel Thornberry's nose in the remake. :3
+Vladtheimpaler1337 smashing
A obvious clip of video as opposed to in game. Otherwise the other scenes would look that much better also.
no where near worth 80$
+OkamI No one's gonna buy the game used for 65$. 40 maybe, but I'm sure most who actually are interested in Infinite Warfare will have pre-ordered it already.
cant do this on pc... .so is this just a big fu to us pc players?
$15-20. Already bought Cod4 full price back in the days.
***** Because maybe, I don't know, I can't be bothered to pay for their new piece of shit space game, but I do want the MW1 remaster. That's why people are rightfully pissed off.
OkamI For all we know the CoD4 remaster needs the IW disc to work though. Has it been officially announced that CoD4 will be a code? Or part of Infinite Warfare?
side by side video comparison would be great
Did you watch the video? Every scene is compared side by side...
He means side by side of the video itself
Is it me that at 1:46 the original looks better than the remastered version
totally agree
Rip cod..... They fucked up the one release I was excited for...
+Abraham Because they went with a different texture for the wall they ruined your favorite call of duty? You have got to be kidding me.
+Ty Schmidt you just don't fucking understand people's feelings you bigot fuckhead, do ya? That fucking wall there was the pinnacle of the whole Call of Duty Modern Warfare game which inspired millions and Infinite Ward fucking ruined it with a plain plaster wall instead of its marvelous bone-white brick wall texture which won the hearts and minds of gamers everywhere. It's a tragic display of hypocrisy and neglect by the developers who claim to have gone back to the series' roots.
+I'll put a Jihad on you too lmfao. comment of the day.
in the remastered version Zakaev looks like a Chinese emperor.. or is that just me lol
They both do
From original to remastered
TheWaitingGuy 03 A little bit i guess, but seeing how far game graphics have come in the past 9 years is incredible.
Some pics cod 4 looks better than remastered
like the door breach at 1:46
Don't forget that the remastered version is taken from the trailers we seen so far. Just wait for a gameplay...
I'm not so sure about the door breach comparison. The chipped wall textures in the remaster look fantastic, but they'll need to spread those across the whole wall, not just the edge. If they do that properly, it'll definitely look better than the repetitive brick texture which lacks character
Captain Price looks like Connor Mcgregor.
He looks like Ali-A with a bushy beard in the original 😂😂
he looks like satan ( fire back ground )
#jnation - 21st Century Music conor actually played in infinite warfare
Almost no difference, only big thing is that in the new trailer everything is made blurry.
u need to get your eyes checked
Giant Male Genitalia Take a loot at 1:45, the soldiers by the door shot. It even looks worse, less detail, less sharpness and just blurry.
true, there is so ridiculous blur but the other details are alot better
Other than the fact that the vanilla faces look like clay...lol
Its just a trailer it's bond to change over time
the nuke on the original is better
hahahahha
no just no
I respect your opinion...but..no..just..no.
?
Not sure if you've ever seen an actual nuke go off but trust me the trailer is far superior
Apart from that one shot with the door breach, this looks like a great improvement!
Nathan uncharted Drake Videos
okay
Nathan uncharted Drake Videos
lol How was I supposed to get that?
I think they are, yeah.
Nathan uncharted Drake Videos
Yeah, they've really been stretching the engine. Hopefully they'll upgrade it after the second wave of new gen games.
I doubt it because saying there's a new game engine would only appeal to so many people, but it's deserved after, like, 15 years of the same engine lol
+I Do Monologues im sorry did you mean to say quake engine
Eclipz what
the 2007 is better than 2016 kille me
Especially at 1:45
You got that right!
+Noobert obviously we care about graphics becausw 2007 graphics are shit compared to now. if we didnt like the gameplay, we wouldnt want it remastered, you fucking knob.
using "fucking knob" is always underlining your importance of your comment very well and everyone is paying loads of attention towards you.
people saying the old graphics look better xD look at some gameplay now and then watch some from the original
Wow. Makarov's airport shooting took place in this year... Hmm.
Instead it was in a gay bar
Coreydoesvideos Actually, on the fourth mission of Modern Warfare 2, Private Allen of the C.I.A., goes undercover by the orders of General Shepard, to obtain information on him and his plans. There wasn't a gay bar that I've noticed in the game.
+Coreydoesvideos ...
+Ian Randolph he was talking about in orlando, real life
KaYoS I was talking about Modern Warfare 2. Not that terrorist attack from Orlando. What does that have to do with this game?
Sucks that you are forced to buy a shitty game to get this remaster of an amazing game.
It will be made available separately shortly after the release. Many gamer's aren't buying Infinite Warfare in protest against Activisions shitty business decision to combine them. It is projected that the sales for Infinite Warfare are going to be worst in COD history by a huge margin
Enlightened Tha THIRD Good, I never asked for this futuristic bull shit.
daemondawg I don't mind the future setting when it's done right like Battlefield 2142. COD just got milked waaaaaay too hard. It was inevitable
Enlightened Tha THIRD Well I never played Battlefield 2142, but from what everyone says, it's a great game and i would love to play it, but i hate when companies try to milk their customers. Such as the fucking supply drops and all that other bullshit. In a different video i saw someone said the futuristic setting COD's were more successful, and i replied that they are only successful because of the supply drops. The few people that bought their future game put all their money into supply drops. I apologize for my rant.
daemondawg I agree. Level boosting micro-transactions should be banned from multiplayer. It ruins the balance and makes the game less enjoyable/rewarding for people who actually make an effort
This is kind of disappointing considering how this is a cutscene and the halo 2 part of master chief collection had far superior cutscenes and graphics compared to original halo 2
The Halo 2 MC Collection's cutscenes were entirely redone by Blur Studio, and they are incredible at hyper-true-to-life realistic effects, go check out the Blur Studio Animation reel or watch their Star Wars Old Republic trailers to see. The CoD 4 remaster is being done by Activision's Raven Software, and their focus will be different. Their focus for this game is of course on gameplay graphics, which in this case are going to be the same as cutscene graphics because CoD 4's cutscenes were all rendered in-engine in real time, not pre-rendered like the gorgeous Halo 2 remastered cutscenes. That's why you never had that "why do the cutscenes look so much better than when I'm playing?" feeling from Cod 4
+edawg792 oh true, I reckon it would've been cooler though if they hired blur studios for the cutscenes, I've heard the campaign has some pretty good cinematic moments
...cutscenes are irelivent.... they can be pre-rendered like Prince of Persia's on the original xbox.
SparkyBoy Yeah it would definitely look soooo good. But it would also break immersion, like how in CoD 4 the cutscenes were always seamless with gameplay because they basically WERE gameplay, only difference is your movement is controlled (but you could always still look around). But I'll be honest I'd rather see Blur's take on those cutscenes just because they'd look so cool lol.
Halo 2 came out way before CoD 4. Not to mention that one is gameplay and the other is pre-rendered.
am I the only one who thinks that the original looks way cooler
and better
+Furkan Tandogan yes
yep
+Only The Best Of yup
Oh 😂😑
1:45 Original looks better, I dont know why, Rest of the cases Remastered looks better
I Agree, It's Brigther and more detailled ,remastered is blurry
are u dumb, the remastered one was from a trailer, so it was from a video, thats why its blurry. -.-
is it just me or the original actually looks better than the remastered
hahahahaha you`re funny.
The original looks more vibrant
+videogod69 You can't be for real.
Tupu Tati I kinda am because they make the game look gloomy but il buy the game either way
Nope get your eyes checked, honestly stop being one of those fucking idiots who say "Is it me or is the orignal better guys he he?" The answer is no the remaster is better in all ways, the reason some times it looks weird is because of the trailer affects.
1:45 the original looks better lolz
Agreed!
agreed
with no proof, ok
I said the exact same thing. lol
yeah
ugh. to be honest I would prefer a WAW remaster but I guess that's what BF1 is for
I would prefer a WAW remaster too. BF1 looks like battlefront with WW1 skins.
another kid who doesn't know the difference between WW1 or WW2...
leave
BF1 is nothing like WAW
delete
BF1 looks better :)
***** just saying.
guys let him talk this is the first time for him he can say that BF is better
+CashKes it is better
CashKes actualy it's not my first time. Activision don't have any more imagination to make game that dont have jetpacks or wallruns, futuristic shit. and if they make one. it will be TDM, KC game...
Battlefield is much much much more like wargame...
Play arma if you want a real wargame not battlefield
Still better than infinity warfare...
INFINITE WARFARE
+Kool Aid Boy 232 i dont care
+Kool Aid Boy 232 lol nice one
This was one of the best games in cod history what did you expect? IW may turn out to be good but it will never be better than it's grandpa. the same with other games too.
Way better the modern warfare it self is way better this will keep Activision alive
isnt it sad more people cheered on the remaster at e3 instead of infinite warfare
No not really
I was the only one who cheered at my location... it was awkward but I'm exited for it
people just like to jump on the hate train because when the trailer started, no one knew it was cod until he either pulled out his weapon or the title was shown then. people were saying what game is this, it looks pretty good, and as soon they found out it was cod, the instantly started talking trash.. that's lame as f. and I don't even like cod.
Does anybody else get the chills when you hear that music start up? Too many great memories with that game. So many nights of staying up with all of your friends. A golden era.....
02:24 looks like an eye
according to the conspiracy theorist the illuminati will make nuc to fuck dow the humantiy and replace a demon residency so its conspiracy
Sauron!!
I got eyes in the skies
Higher quality textures and more effects. Both has the same engines but the new one got updated to hell. Good ol idtech3 from 99.
lol... xD i am sure they "don't have the money" to buy the licence for a modern engine. This could be the only reason why are they stuck on updating this shit. Well its not shit because it was a good thing in the 20th century.
Both engines are from 2005
Its started from the first CoD in 2003 and they picked the idtech3 engine from the 90s. And they just continued with it modifying and upgrading the same thing over and over again. On this link you can see some real history. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IW_engine Every cod game and even quake3 or jedi academy has the same bugs on limited 125, 250, 333 or 1000fps because of the shit basic engine the idtech3.
I know about the bugs and stuff on those framerates, but how exactly?
Ask activision, treyarch and infinity ward. You wont get an answer. I don't know if anyone can answer this... It would be fixed i'm sure if they would know ow this happens. But under 2 decades the fix did not happen so it's an extra for an overpriced rework of a reworked rework.
*This game alone could stand against Battlefield. People who never touched COD 4 can't talk about it. It's wonderful. Unfortunately, I won't be fuck*d by Activision and there's is no way I'm buying Infinite Dislikes.*
they wont care about a sheep like you. Millions will buy it
Raphi Müller Right, but who is the real sheep in this story ?
+ethanon2001 lol wtf
then pirate games !
Don't forget this is a clip not actual gameplay I don't think that the original will look better but if it does I will never buy a new cod again
original batter than trailer 😊
wat
no just no
better than Sorry 😁+Lol wot? Memes are dying?
+SetyGames what not wat 🌚
The offer is better than the first show+Lol wot? Memes are dying?
The music bring back so many memories
I would laugj my ass if if the remastered edition would get a graphics downgrade
Luckily when it comes to CoD games we get exactly what we see. Unlike Ubisoft.
+Mr Savage didn't ubisoft sign some contract this year that the trailer or demo shown at e3 must represent the final game. Or u know the final game can look better.
proof?
3:18 Captain Price's mustache in the remastered looks like a mustache, but in the original looks like a hairy sausage.
We have a new video with HQ trailer material from the mission Crew Expandable (1080p60 @37Mbit!!!) so please go here: ua-cam.com/video/zTqKagN8NpQ/v-deo.html
***** What mistake?
The labels are correct. Remaster = Trailer. Original = Original version.
There is no mistake there either.
Nostalgia
Kyle is cool hbj. Z
to be honest it doesnt look thaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat much better
***** not that much of a difference i could get those graphics in original with enb so
+saintPlays no lol
+saintPlays look at 3:17
Cameron Teeple looks still shit only effects are pumped up i could go into an program and change it to that
***** trust me any noob can go on youtube search a adobe after effects tutorial and do it himself it only takes few hours and practice then you can get extreme good effects on every video its not hard and when you study stuff like that it will be even easier
Simple Way :
Put Contrast : High
Put Gamma : Down
Put Saturation : High
Put some effects into it like : lens Flare Hot Colers and all that shit and wolla you got an even better looking Picture/Video then that trailer :)
That music man! Those feeeeeeeels! I feel like playing CoD4 again!! How I love that game
Actually it wasn't fucked until advanced warfare
I mean ghosts
+Nathan Kirby
I actually really liked ghosts
+that guy
Well I will admit that the campaign for ghosts was pretty meh, the multiplayer was pretty fun.
+OneInch Monster Ghosts had the most fun campaign in my opinion. Each level was unique as it went from helicopters, to stealth, to sniping.
10 years for this
I can't be the only one that actually wanted Mw2 instead of this....
Mw was better than Mw2
I fucking wanted mw2 aswell more than cod4
lmao hate all these bandawagons saying cod4 is better than this and that or better than mw2.. clearly they havent even played both games
Cod 4 was better than mw2 doe
completely agree I love mw2 more then any cod game but there is still a bunch of people playing on 360
Am I the only one that thinks the original is better?
Ozbryan, you're only a fanboy, relax
Helmut Alzheimer What if I told you that I dislike and despise the Call Of Duty Franchise? doesn't make me much of a fanboy anymore doesn't it kid.
Same mw2 disappointed me so badly that they've made me to stop buying CoD games and went back to CoD 4,WaW was awesome but the rest felt all the same even the futuristic ones and I had the chance to play all the newer releases luckily I haven't bought them I would have felt scammed by the developers.Look at IW how few weapons there are and the DLCs...I know Battlefield fans who say Battlefield DLcs are a scamm because they're releasing half game and I don't see it like that 100%(They exist since BF1942 and are jsut expansions now they feel like because almost everygame developer is doing it they feel also scammed by BF developers, must admit BF premium at the price of 50 is also a bit too much It's like the price of the game) If we look at COD DLCs these are a real scamm
some parts do look better on the original one then the "remastered".
what i'd like to see is MOH : allied assault remastered.
HELL YEAH!!!!
It was one of the best multiplayer game i have ever played ! remember that blood patch ? ahah
medal of honor was only ww2 im pretty sure lol, the only ww1 games i know of that are fps is verdun and of course battlefield 1
yes please!
I liked the part when cpt price said "WE ARE LEAVING!"
That shitty blur everywhere. Where the hell is the clear graphics in modern games?
сейчас от этого не избавится, мне оригинал больше по нраву, он что-ли более атмосферный .
What?
+Tharindu Rajakaruna Wodka Wodka Putin molotow Wladimir
мне оригинал! больше #по нравx
+Tharindu Rajakaruna he says that blurry crap is common thing now, and he likes old version for being more authentic.
Why you used old CoD video with low graphic settings?
I don't. It's maxed out.
nah m8 the nintendo ds had a better experience xD jk
The only reason to buy a Infinite Warfare.
Or you can watch someone play it on UA-cam and save your money.
My GOD... What a diferrence!!! The new one is AMAZING. Stunning graphics.
Maybe i'm blind,but i see much blurry graphics,but not much better.
In trailers it's difficult to get a still screenshot, usually if you pause a trailer it has this sort of blur effect to it.
but screens from original cod are made from trailer too
+ReviewBySlick
Original was actuall gameplay
COD 4 is admired because of its compelling story and great characters. From what I've seen so far, it seems that the remaster is trying to tell the story with a more cinematic feel, hence the blurring of backgrounds and huge increase of environmental effects like smoke and haze. The detail added to the jetty at 1:17 (posts going into the water) are the sort of additions we'll see plenty of. Also, you must be blind if you can't tell the difference in Zakhaev's face at 1:02 :P
COD MW is really greate,butremaster is made only to make infinte warfare solds bigger,cause u can't buy onky MW remaster,you must buy infinite warfare to get it
It's the same fucking game. What on gods green earth are people thinking when they decide they want to pay for a game they've already got? You do realise this is what games are going to be from here on out now? Re-releases of everything 5 years down the line because it's kids who get excited and buy the games.
Well done everyone.
It amazes me how people hate on IW but then they buy the 80$ version of IW just because a game that has been out for years is included in it.
+Vince D (vdvdman) do you have COD4 for PS4??
+Isaac Jimenez Cod 4 for ps4 is the same game as the one for the ps3. It just looks prettier for the ps4. The Master Chief Collection is a smart idea. 4 games for the price of one. $80 minimum for just cod4 remastered and IW is not a smart decision.
$60 for IW and $20 for COD4 . hows that not smart . You can always sell back IW
+Isaac Jimenez That's true. but what's not smart is that people will just buy IW becouse they want cod 4 REMASTERED. even though they talk shit about IW. but then that just fuels the cod flames and thus not getting any change.
I think captain price face looks better in the original one.
I think you're confusing vastly superior graphics with play-dough
+Enlightened Tha THIRD I guess I'm just use to seeing his original look.
I'm also used to the original game. Sometimes character models change in instances like this, but I don't any difference here. They look fundamentally identical
+Enlightened Tha THIRD yeah I agree with you they do look identical it just sucks that you have to buy infinite warfare to play the remaster version.
D. Fortner Yea, it's a dirty way of making up for the loss in sales for Infinite Warfare since there's such a huge hate bandwagon atm for the franchise. I'll either wait for the Modern Warfare Remaster to be released separately, to go on sale at 50% off
Watching this video after it finally is free on PlayStation
Stop with this bs in the comments, guys. The Remastered version looks way better than the original in every screenshot. With COD4 we actually reached the point that not only EACH new COD has to be worse than it, but even a Remastered must be considered shit just because of some nostalgic idiots.
Pause at 1:49
Game looks rushed a little.
They added too much blur so they didn't have to work on details.
Il stick to my gaming rig and play the old one maxed out lol
It's the fucking trailer.
Jesus, what's with the bandwagon of hating new games these days?
Singh is King Holy shit, nice word choice, not like it's never been used before, such originality.Like I fucking said, stop being such a follower.
They'll fine tune the details when they release a Modern Warfare Remastered collection. That way the bundle will look better than the individual games they release slowly over the next few years making the bundle have more overall value than the single games.
+Andrew Palombit doesn't that make you feel that you paying good money for half a game?
Andrew Palombit doesn't that make you feel that you paying good money for half a game?
The Pirate Bay here i come!
omg, idk why but the theme in the background makes me feel so emotional
Original looks better
still looks the same whats the difference
Get your eyes checked
get your brain cheeked i think you are totally brain dead
You should watch the official trailer on CoD's channel, this guy used shitty Lightshot screenshots for this video. Notice when he used one clip from the Prologue mission, the graphics were beautiful, but as soon as he went back to using screnshots he got himself, it was shit.
That is all we got by that time. Here is new comparison with HQ material (1080p60 with 37 Mbit): ua-cam.com/video/zTqKagN8NpQ/v-deo.html
if you mean that they did not change the campain or the game itself, then BE FUCKING PROUD OF IT!
the main antagonist looks better on the old game. creepier wrinkles. totally more menacing. this guy looks watered down
the older game actually looked better in many ways. it utilised greys and dark colours better, shadows were darker, the colour was less exaggerated. its this new console generation. they have so much colour to incorporate well into their graphics but they overdo it and lose the focus.
get back to making games for the game, guys.
We haven't seen gameplay yet.
+Fabulous hotdog (Fabulous_hotdog) this is true, Spectacular weiner
That is the problem with trailers. They are too deceiving and always look better than the actual games. it's called Pre-Baked cinematics when it comes to trailers. I do believe though the call of duty 4 remaster trailer is legitimate gameplay graphics but it is too shiny in my opinion to be considered realistic looking.
protagonist is actually the good guy i believe, the antagonist is the bad guy
Damn the music in the background is nostalgic