Refrigerant Classifications and Changes Full Training- 2023

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 вер 2024
  • Don Gillis from Chemours talks about changes in the world of refrigerants. From hydrocarbons classification of refrigerants, this high-level training will provide you with the knowledge you need about refrigerants and changes coming to the HVAC industry.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 7

  • @miami1393
    @miami1393 10 місяців тому +3

    On a different note, you sound and look just like John Goodman 😂😂
    But great informative video

  • @logansummerlin1007
    @logansummerlin1007 4 місяці тому

    Why did you decide to combine R-32 with R-1234yf? With all the negative around the R-1234yf.

  • @billm.2677
    @billm.2677 6 днів тому

    I am currently in the market to replace a 40 year old R22 system.
    I will be so glad to help save the planet with this new system, but I am concerned over the damage to humanity and wildlife from PFAS “forever chemicals” that are found in MOST current refrigerants.
    What is the plan forward for homeowners when R454b gets banned for the PFAS content? And, don’t you feel some sort of responsibility to notify the EPA of the error in their directive for you to actually make and promote these product that you know to be enduring and toxic?
    Should consumers invest in new system designed to use a gas already on the scope for a ban in Europe?
    With your well documented history of placing the interests end consumers first, why couldn’t Chemours just be competitive in the manufacture of “Good Old R32” which is not on the PFAS hit list in Europe, or introduce their secret “forever chemicals safe” R454b replacement right now?
    I think it would be a shame to make sure we have a Non-GWP world where everyone is poisoned by your “Forever Chemicals”. BTW, I do admire the skillful way you use to blame the equipment manufacturers and technicians for failure to contain refrigerant gas, you should have done that in the R-12, R-22 days (unfortunately for your $$$$ that your patents ran out on that stuff before you could get the warning out).

  • @skikansas66617
    @skikansas66617 5 місяців тому +2

    So Chlorine used in industry and used in cleaning products is not causing ozone depletion?
    I find it hard to believe banning R12 and R22 as a refrigerant alone is the reason the ozone has closed.
    R22 and R12 were the best refrigerants IMO. If manufactures would build solid components that didn't leak, there would not be an issue.
    Driving all of this is $$$ profit for manufactures.

    • @user-hh4oc2ch1q
      @user-hh4oc2ch1q 5 місяців тому

      2c (ymmv). refrigerants don't have free (reactive) chlorine and will persist in the environment in a gaseous form. The chlorine in bleach etc. will react and form a liquid or solid that will not reach the ozone layer. e.g. table salt has chlorine but is not an ozone concern. Corporations will seek to profit from the regulatory environment whenever possible to recoup losses from the regulatory environment.

    • @unabridgeddick6645
      @unabridgeddick6645 2 місяці тому

      👀 did you study and pass the EPA608? The answer was in there.

    • @gregdebacker3569
      @gregdebacker3569 2 місяці тому

      @@unabridgeddick6645 I did, only if you believe the science.
      30 years from now. they will deem A2L's an issue, as they did in 920-1940, and go back to R22, a safe non toxic refrigerant.
      3 billion population of India and China still use CFC's and still building coal fired power plants.Wait until Africa comes into the modern age.