Anxiety and depression is the time to go in a deeper relationship with God. As Christians we're called to endure and persevere during trying times. We all produce fruit we couldn't produce otherwise. Pursue God Confess sin, forgive, fast, abide-proclaim meditate on His word-Proverbs for deliverance, or see a Christian therapist, fellowship with believers-community accountability and fight- in God's Armor. Ephesians 6:10👑 Proverbs 3:5-6 🙏 "Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding. In all your ways acknowledge him, and he will make straight your paths."
@@NewCreationInChrist896 Christian therapists are awful and tend not to have the relevant accreditations. Anxiety and depression is not related to any god, it's psychological.
@@JesusTheSaviour7032 I live in a country where therapists keep their religious beliefs to themselves. They're secular. That thing you hate for some reason. Are you fighting to live in a theocracy?
Amen, God's work-our fruit and obedience is evidence we're saved, it shows God is working through us. Pray and talk to God in a relationship, seeking His will, read His word in prayer, praise, give thanks, help others and share the Gospel. We're not the thief on the cross, God has a plan for all of His Children. Ephesians 2:10 👑 Matthew 6:33
Hebrews 8:13 💝 "In that He says, “ A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away." Romans 2:14-15 👑🙏 "for when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do the things in the law, these, although not having the law, are a law to themselves, who show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and between themselves their thoughts"
2:09:43 Audience member: Now he leans towards thinking choice is an illusion. Frank: “Did he choose to believe that?” Suppose the person who believes choice is an illusion answers “no”. Then what? How is Frank’s question supposed to offer any insight into whether choice is an illusion?
He's obsessed with logical paradoxes. It's cute and clever at first but soon begins to grate on the nerves, because it's often a substitute for reasoned argument.
@@joshuakohlmann9731 I don’t think this would even qualify as a paradox though. As far as I can tell there’s nothing contradictory or paradoxical about the following two propositions being true: 1. Choice is an illusion, and 2. I didn’t choose to believe that choice is an illusion. Those two statements seem perfectly consistent.
Please pray for Melanie cherifi for salvation and demonic influence in her life and around her as well and God deliver her wrong crowd people and her coworkers and also her sexual sin..Thank You
Or you could, I dont know... actually DO SOMETHING to affect change? Nahhhh.... let's just go the "thoughts and prayers" route. It's been working so well!
@@paulcooper1223 Too many times "based in reality" just means "my truth" especially in the education system today. A system that's producing adults that can't even answer a simple question like "what is a woman?"
@@rockzalt Is that your unbiased opinion or just what you've read? Does the definition of "woman" just have one listing? Are you confusing sex with gender? Seems like you've mistaken your opinion for fact. Maybe don't rely on Matt Walsh for you information and definitely not Frank Turek who denies science.
David Lynn breaks down the hebrew israelites right on the street. They try toclaim Jesus only came to save them, but if you ask them, they arent saved. Plus the many scriptures that literally say He came for all who hear him. They have to add or subtract from the literal word for most of their claims.
@Paul Cooper It's a hypothesis with no real evidence.. Atheists have nothing but hope and wishful thinking for it.. Nobody has shown a method to make the homochiral versions of lipids, amino acids, nucleotides or carbohydrates in a prebiotically relevant manner. Chemists purchase chemicals in high purity and yield from chemical companies. Chemists Arrange those chemicals in a specific order under a set of carefully controlled devised conditions designed synthesizer machines, Activating agents, templates. Etc
@@tonymaurice4157 I'm not seeing a citation. Are you under the impression only atheists are studying it? Did life always exist or did it start at some point? Seems you're ignorant of the Miller-Urey experiment. What is your explanation for how life started? They magically appeared?
@Paul Cooper 1953 Miller experiment produced useless racemic amino acids That would never fold into a functional protein! Step into 2022 and no scientists are close, even with optimal lab environments! clueless and brainwashed!
If Christians couldn't be silly- they wouldn't have a religion, at all. They need to believe that donkeys can talk... and Noah's ark... and nonsense like that. Are you trying to take that away from them?
@@mattslater2603 "donkeys can talk" here you are. Bring the exact verse. *EXACT* You just keep repeating the idiotic _straw man_ . >> Ernest Camps 7 days ago @Matt Slater "donkeys can talk" = straw man. "..whenever God will it's." = moving the goal posts fallacy committed. Go back to take care of your child, you are not contributing anything of substance. >> @Matt Slater "donkeys can talk" ≠ "donkeys CAN talk, whenever God will it's" You changed your statement, when objection was rised. => _moving the goal post_ Are you really this dense ?
What evidence do you have to support your assertion (that God doesn't exist)? If you have no evidence, doesn't that mean you have blind faith in your belief?
@@mattslater2603well since we are being sarcastic…I wouldn’t want to take away the greater silliness of your goddess…the Non-Living, Non-Intelligent, Lady of Luck-Mother Nature. Frank is absolutely right: I just don’t have enough faith to be a worshipper of a dead goddess who seems to work her magic of miracles.
I agree with Frank mostly but agree to disagree on old earth. Actually more science for young earth. Just one, population growth with current age of procreation takes just a few thousand years to reach 8 billion from 2 people.
It doesn’t take faith to be an atheist Frank. You really need to stop misrepresenting atheism and science. You act like what some people say applies to all those who don’t hold your views. That’s blatant misrepresentation. Using only certain scientists quotes doesn’t then equal a fact of reality. Your “arguments”? Dont actually work how you want and prove any god is responsible. Now if I’m wrong, then let’s open the floor for discussion. If someone thinks the cosmological argument works then let’s start there.
Science already provides evidence that time, space, and matter had a beginning. Boy was there resistance to that when it first came out because of the ingrained belief that everything was internal. Since it had a beginning, it had to have a cause. And since time, space, matter had a beginning, the cause had to be outside of time, space and matter. The effect can't be the cause of itself, that would be logically incoherent.
@@elkhuntr2816 _science already provided evidence that time space and matter had a beginning_ Actually that’s not accurate. There are some theories and models which suggest that. And some that say they didn’t have a beginning. It also comes down to how we conceptualize and grasp certain concepts. _boy was there resistance to that when it first came out_ Yes. And it’s still not agreed upon. _since it had a beginning, it had to have a cause_ It’s likely this universe had a “beginning” of that concept applies, and I don’t think anyone really says there wasn’t a cause. What is said is we don’t know what the cause was. _and since time, space, matter had a beginning, the cause had to be outside of time, space, and matter_ We don’t know if thats true for both parts there. _the effect can’t be the cause of islet that would be logically incoherent_ To you. Some don’t have any issues with such a concept. There are some models which don’t need an outside cause. But let’s ask you this then….what is the answer/explanation?
@@therick363 "It’s likely this universe had a “beginning” of that concept applies, and I don’t think anyone really says there wasn’t a cause. What is said is we don’t know what the cause was." Based on that fact (time, space, matter had a beginning), there are things that necessarily follow. The cause could not be within time, space, or matter. Since they began to exist, the cause had to exist at a point when space, time, and matter did not exist. Therefore logically the cause had to exist outside of space, time, and matter. Since the cause existed a point when there was no space, time, or matter, the cause had to be immaterial, spaceless, and timeless. That also logically follows. On top of that, the cause had to be a personal agent capable of free will deciding to create something rather than nothing. Einsteins theory of relativity points to the fact that time, space, and matter have to coexist.
@@elkhuntr2816 _based on the fact (time space matter had a beginning) there are things that necessary follow_ Except that it’s NOT a fact. So saying that necessarily follow is into a hypothetical/thought experiment. The rest of what you said into works that way when we don’t know for a fact. If I’m wrong then share how it’s a fact….. Yes Einstein’s theory supports that. But his theory is incomplete. We know this. It’s not the whole picture. We also have quantum theories that say there wasn’t a beginning. We also know they aren’t the whole picture. So I’m sorry you can’t only use Einstein and disregard other scientific concepts.
@@jeffphelps1355 again, that’s your view. Doesn’t then equal those who are atheists haven’t used logic. _it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to be critical_ So? Is there a point you’re trying to make with that line? Because I’m not a rocket scientist and I’ve used critical thinking and became an atheist.
@@jeffphelps1355 "it doesn't take a rocket scientist to be critical" What? How is that relevant to anything? You're correct tho, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to be a critical thinker You just have to know how logic functions.... So why don't you?
@Matt Slater Nobody has shown a method to make the homochiral versions of lipids, amino acids, nucleotides or carbohydrates in a prebiotically relevant manner. Chemists purchase chemicals in high purity and yield from chemical companies. Chemists Arrange those chemicals in a specific order under a set of carefully controlled devised conditions designed synthesizer machines, Activating agents, templates. Etc
@@mattslater2603 Hey matt, how come you cant provide the verse for the fallacious "monkeys can talk" straw man, yet you are hurrying to make other logical fallacies ?
Brother Frank, your ministry is such an incredible blessing from our Lord and Savior, I can't wait to see your well earned rewards from our Father God
Love this Ministry sooo much!
ALL PRAISE AND GLORY TO THE LORD❤🙌
Three years ago I arrived to New Brunswick from PR 🇵🇷. Jah bless NB and Frank Turek!
Anxiety and depression is the time to go in a deeper relationship with God. As Christians we're called to endure and persevere during trying times. We all produce fruit we couldn't produce otherwise. Pursue God Confess sin, forgive, fast, abide-proclaim meditate on His word-Proverbs for deliverance, or see a Christian therapist, fellowship with believers-community accountability and fight- in God's Armor.
Ephesians 6:10👑
Proverbs 3:5-6 🙏
"Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding.
In all your ways acknowledge him, and he will make straight your paths."
Anxiety and depression is a good time to speak to a professional who doesn't talk about the Bible.
@@paulcooper1223 💕
That’s for nonbelievers who don’t won’t God, a Christian professional therapist is for believers.
@@NewCreationInChrist896 Christian therapists are awful and tend not to have the relevant accreditations.
Anxiety and depression is not related to any god, it's psychological.
@@paulcooper1223 Have you been to a Christian therapist?
@@JesusTheSaviour7032 I live in a country where therapists keep their religious beliefs to themselves. They're secular.
That thing you hate for some reason. Are you fighting to live in a theocracy?
@CE, thank you.
Brave young man in that red/orange hoodie. Brave young man.
Amen, God's work-our fruit and obedience is evidence we're saved, it shows God is working through us. Pray and talk to God in a relationship, seeking His will, read His word in prayer, praise, give thanks, help others and share the Gospel. We're not the thief on the cross, God has a plan for all of His Children.
Ephesians 2:10 👑
Matthew 6:33
I don't think there has never been so much people asking questions.
Good. Spiritual hunger
Great contact on the Judging subject
Hebrews 8:13 💝
"In that He says, “ A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away."
Romans 2:14-15 👑🙏
"for when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do the things in the law, these, although not having the law, are a law to themselves, who show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and between themselves their thoughts"
4:19 6:20 47:33 1:41:08 1:52:58
2:09:43
Audience member: Now he leans towards thinking choice is an illusion.
Frank: “Did he choose to believe that?”
Suppose the person who believes choice is an illusion answers “no”. Then what? How is Frank’s question supposed to offer any insight into whether choice is an illusion?
He's obsessed with logical paradoxes. It's cute and clever at first but soon begins to grate on the nerves, because it's often a substitute for reasoned argument.
@@joshuakohlmann9731 I don’t think this would even qualify as a paradox though. As far as I can tell there’s nothing contradictory or paradoxical about the following two propositions being true: 1. Choice is an illusion, and 2. I didn’t choose to believe that choice is an illusion. Those two statements seem perfectly consistent.
I've followed a lot of good information on answers in Genesis that points to a young earth and that it is important to our faith.
This information would be…..
Dear sister, why is a young earth important to our faith?
46:45 LOL at the person that took a photo of the projection screen before Dr. Turek had listed all three points so they had to take another one 😂🙏🕊️🕊️
Please pray for Melanie cherifi for salvation and demonic influence in her life and around her as well and God deliver her wrong crowd people and her coworkers and also her sexual sin..Thank You
Or you could, I dont know... actually DO SOMETHING to affect change?
Nahhhh.... let's just go the "thoughts and prayers" route.
It's been working so well!
@@mattslater2603 please keep her in your prayers 🙏. Thank you
lol... I got my own math and you owe me 1 million dollars... 🤣🤣🤣🤣
This is the stuff that they don't teach you in the classroom, at least not the one's I went too.
What stuff are you referring to?
That's because schools are meant to teach subjects based in reality.
@@therick363 All of it. From the lesson about simple logic to intelligent design with a good side order of literary criticism to boot.
@@paulcooper1223 Too many times "based in reality" just means "my truth" especially in the education system today. A system that's producing adults that can't even answer a simple question like "what is a woman?"
@@rockzalt Is that your unbiased opinion or just what you've read?
Does the definition of "woman" just have one listing?
Are you confusing sex with gender?
Seems like you've mistaken your opinion for fact.
Maybe don't rely on Matt Walsh for you information and definitely not Frank Turek who denies science.
I never get tires of these
I personally get tired of the misrepresenting from Frank of atheism and science
What misrepresentations?
David Lynn breaks down the hebrew israelites right on the street. They try toclaim Jesus only came to save them, but if you ask them, they arent saved. Plus the many scriptures that literally say He came for all who hear him. They have to add or subtract from the literal word for most of their claims.
Abiogenesis is a failure!
@@tonymaurice4157Is it? Citations?
@Paul Cooper It's a hypothesis with no real evidence.. Atheists have nothing but hope and wishful thinking for it..
Nobody has shown a method to make the homochiral versions of lipids, amino acids, nucleotides or carbohydrates in a prebiotically relevant manner.
Chemists purchase chemicals in high purity and yield from chemical companies. Chemists Arrange those chemicals in a specific order under a set of carefully controlled devised conditions designed synthesizer machines, Activating agents, templates. Etc
@@tonymaurice4157 I'm not seeing a citation.
Are you under the impression only atheists are studying it?
Did life always exist or did it start at some point?
Seems you're ignorant of the Miller-Urey experiment.
What is your explanation for how life started? They magically appeared?
@Paul Cooper 1953 Miller experiment produced useless racemic amino acids That would never fold into a functional protein! Step into 2022 and no scientists are close, even with optimal lab environments!
clueless and brainwashed!
This guy says the same thing sounding like the animaniac skunks. He's actually helping people become atheists
He wouldn't have to say the same thing if atheist stopped asking the same question 🤷🏻♂️. Atheist are like BOTS.
BUT THE GOD OF THE BIBLE DON'T EXIST! DON'T BE SILLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If Christians couldn't be silly- they wouldn't have a religion, at all.
They need to believe that donkeys can talk... and Noah's ark... and nonsense like that.
Are you trying to take that away from them?
@@mattslater2603 "donkeys can talk" here you are. Bring the exact verse. *EXACT*
You just keep repeating the idiotic _straw man_ .
>>
Ernest Camps
7 days ago
@Matt Slater "donkeys can talk" = straw man.
"..whenever God will it's." = moving the goal posts fallacy committed.
Go back to take care of your child, you are not contributing anything of substance.
>>
@Matt Slater "donkeys can talk" ≠ "donkeys CAN talk, whenever God will it's"
You changed your statement, when objection was rised. => _moving the goal post_
Are you really this dense ?
What evidence do you have to support your assertion (that God doesn't exist)? If you have no evidence, doesn't that mean you have blind faith in your belief?
@@mattslater2603well since we are being sarcastic…I wouldn’t want to take away the greater silliness of your goddess…the Non-Living, Non-Intelligent, Lady of Luck-Mother Nature. Frank is absolutely right: I just don’t have enough faith to be a worshipper of a dead goddess who seems to work her magic of miracles.
I agree with Frank mostly but agree to disagree on old earth. Actually more science for young earth. Just one, population growth with current age of procreation takes just a few thousand years to reach 8 billion from 2 people.
You are aware that one can make any mathematical model fit any time frame right?
What’s the science for a young earth
It doesn’t take faith to be an atheist Frank. You really need to stop misrepresenting atheism and science.
You act like what some people say applies to all those who don’t hold your views. That’s blatant misrepresentation. Using only certain scientists quotes doesn’t then equal a fact of reality.
Your “arguments”? Dont actually work how you want and prove any god is responsible.
Now if I’m wrong, then let’s open the floor for discussion.
If someone thinks the cosmological argument works then let’s start there.
Science already provides evidence that time, space, and matter had a beginning. Boy was there resistance to that when it first came out because of the ingrained belief that everything was internal. Since it had a beginning, it had to have a cause. And since time, space, matter had a beginning, the cause had to be outside of time, space and matter. The effect can't be the cause of itself, that would be logically incoherent.
@@elkhuntr2816 _science already provided evidence that time space and matter had a beginning_
Actually that’s not accurate. There are some theories and models which suggest that. And some that say they didn’t have a beginning. It also comes down to how we conceptualize and grasp certain concepts.
_boy was there resistance to that when it first came out_
Yes. And it’s still not agreed upon.
_since it had a beginning, it had to have a cause_
It’s likely this universe had a “beginning” of that concept applies, and I don’t think anyone really says there wasn’t a cause. What is said is we don’t know what the cause was.
_and since time, space, matter had a beginning, the cause had to be outside of time, space, and matter_
We don’t know if thats true for both parts there.
_the effect can’t be the cause of islet that would be logically incoherent_
To you. Some don’t have any issues with such a concept. There are some models which don’t need an outside cause. But let’s ask you this then….what is the answer/explanation?
@@therick363 "It’s likely this universe had a “beginning” of that concept applies, and I don’t think anyone really says there wasn’t a cause. What is said is we don’t know what the cause was." Based on that fact (time, space, matter had a beginning), there are things that necessarily follow. The cause could not be within time, space, or matter. Since they began to exist, the cause had to exist at a point when space, time, and matter did not exist. Therefore logically the cause had to exist outside of space, time, and matter. Since the cause existed a point when there was no space, time, or matter, the cause had to be immaterial, spaceless, and timeless. That also logically follows. On top of that, the cause had to be a personal agent capable of free will deciding to create something rather than nothing. Einsteins theory of relativity points to the fact that time, space, and matter have to coexist.
@@elkhuntr2816 _based on the fact (time space matter had a beginning) there are things that necessary follow_
Except that it’s NOT a fact. So saying that necessarily follow is into a hypothetical/thought experiment. The rest of what you said into works that way when we don’t know for a fact. If I’m wrong then share how it’s a fact…..
Yes Einstein’s theory supports that. But his theory is incomplete. We know this. It’s not the whole picture. We also have quantum theories that say there wasn’t a beginning. We also know they aren’t the whole picture.
So I’m sorry you can’t only use Einstein and disregard other scientific concepts.
@@therick363 So you're still a believer in the steady state theory? How do you explain the expanding universe discovered in 1929?
Cross examine shows our faith is founded on logic
My position is founded on logic and it’s not the same position.
You mean logical fallacies... right??
I don't see logic in atheism. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to be critical.
@@jeffphelps1355 again, that’s your view. Doesn’t then equal those who are atheists haven’t used logic.
_it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to be critical_
So? Is there a point you’re trying to make with that line? Because I’m not a rocket scientist and I’ve used critical thinking and became an atheist.
@@jeffphelps1355 "it doesn't take a rocket scientist to be critical"
What? How is that relevant to anything?
You're correct tho, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to be a critical thinker
You just have to know how logic functions....
So why don't you?
Abiogenesis is a failure!
That doesn't appear to be the case
@Matt Slater Nobody has shown a method to make the homochiral versions of lipids, amino acids, nucleotides or carbohydrates in a prebiotically relevant manner.
Chemists purchase chemicals in high purity and yield from chemical companies. Chemists Arrange those chemicals in a specific order under a set of carefully controlled devised conditions designed synthesizer machines, Activating agents, templates. Etc
@@tonymaurice4157 do you listen to Dr. James Tour ? Very well respected scientist
There goes Tony trolling around again.
You say abiogenesis is a failure….but I noticed you didn’t offer an alternative explanation…..
@@mattslater2603 Hey matt, how come you cant provide the verse for the fallacious "monkeys can talk" straw man, yet you are hurrying to make other logical fallacies ?