whole lot of nothing burger. she doesn't say which one is better Summary: Based on the provided transcript, the content creator does not explicitly state which model she believes is better between ChatGPT (presumably GPT-4) and Google's Gemini Ultra. She discusses the strengths and weaknesses of both models and emphasizes that she plans to continue testing them to determine if one emerges as a front runner. She leaves it open-ended and encourages viewers to share their own preferences.
Ive been using Gemini a lot over the last week, and find its writing feels much less like AI than ChatGPT. That said, Gemini definitely isnt as "intelligent" as GPT-4: it routinely makes errors that GPT-4 never does, such as confusing its own responses to my previois prompts, as a prompt that I supplied.
Ye, gpt 4 logical and reasonable. Gemini ultra humanlike with not as good training but very creative and great for assisting. Combining both plus ms word’s ai gives like a full suite of knowledge as long as it exists on the web
The main difference that I notice is that gpt seems incapable of giving a straightforward simple answer. You can ask the most simple question like what’s the time and it will write an essay about it, like damn I just wanna know the time. Gemini in the other hand is very comparable of giving short straightforward answers to simple questions.
I've never had this issue with ChatGPT, but instead have had it multiple times with Gemini. For ChatGPT, just specify you want a short or direct answer.
@@dregavero agree , ChatGPT free one is way better than what other companies provide with their free models. ChatGPT easily understands what exactly you are looking for and answer accordingly.
Please make a short or video or anything you wish give a simple prompt and complex prompt to each co pilot and copilot pro gpt 3.5 and gpt 4 Gemini and Gemini ultra please tell us the difference between these free models and paid versions
Ive been testing both since the day Gemini ultra is out and it loses against chatgpt in just about every single use Case except coding for me because i simply dont use it but even in Math and physics, chatgpt was pretty much always right and Gemini was wrong most of the time, sometimes even stated that what Gemini was saying was correct even tough it was wrong, so i really hope 1.5 will get a lot better because simply a longer context window is useless If most answers are wrong
think I'll take a pass on paid versions of AI atm, just wait 6 months till the dust settles and the wrinkles get Irond out, great video BTW, subbed and very like.
Yesss!! Bitcoin going up is good for the entire market. My largest holding is also xrp, and I actually root for bitcoin to do well, because history shows xrp lags behind it.
Big LOL @ this channel. The ability to move from selling trend to trend and pretend to be an expert at them is quite hilarious. This video appeared on my feed and (as I do with all super Youtuby thumbnails) went to check the history of the channel out and wow what a non-surprise. What is funny is usually channels like this try to cover and "blend" the transitions from grift to grift. But this one just moves on and as if it was never there. Went from hawking NFTs to questioning them in 7 videos, then no mention of NFT since. Started with the "selling online courses" trend to farming engagement, to bitcoin/crypto (Yikes) then to the current era...AI chatbots. 😂 Will she stick to this genre? Will she go viral and become known as an "AI content creator"? Or will she inevitably move on when the next get independently rich trend starts? TUNE IN next time on Brie Kirbyson!
whole lot of nothing burger. she doesn't say which one is better
Summary:
Based on the provided transcript, the content creator does not explicitly state which model she believes is better between ChatGPT (presumably GPT-4) and Google's Gemini Ultra. She discusses the strengths and weaknesses of both models and emphasizes that she plans to continue testing them to determine if one emerges as a front runner. She leaves it open-ended and encourages viewers to share their own preferences.
here take my like instead
Hahahaha 🤣
Ive been using Gemini a lot over the last week, and find its writing feels much less like AI than ChatGPT. That said, Gemini definitely isnt as "intelligent" as GPT-4: it routinely makes errors that GPT-4 never does, such as confusing its own responses to my previois prompts, as a prompt that I supplied.
Ye, gpt 4 logical and reasonable. Gemini ultra humanlike with not as good training but very creative and great for assisting. Combining both plus ms word’s ai gives like a full suite of knowledge as long as it exists on the web
The main difference that I notice is that gpt seems incapable of giving a straightforward simple answer. You can ask the most simple question like what’s the time and it will write an essay about it, like damn I just wanna know the time.
Gemini in the other hand is very comparable of giving short straightforward answers to simple questions.
Gemini does this too, no?
This is what bard does to me. Only chatgpt give me straightforward answer. I use both free
I've never had this issue with ChatGPT, but instead have had it multiple times with Gemini. For ChatGPT, just specify you want a short or direct answer.
@@dregavero agree , ChatGPT free one is way better than what other companies provide with their free models. ChatGPT easily understands what exactly you are looking for and answer accordingly.
Gemini ultra gives me like 3x longer responses than gpt-4 u trippin bro. Just use a better system message
Thanks brie for the Ai promt cheatsheet, that was helpful 🔥
Please make a short or video or anything you wish
give a simple prompt and complex prompt to each
co pilot and copilot pro
gpt 3.5 and gpt 4
Gemini and Gemini ultra
please tell us the difference between these free models and paid versions
2TB of cloud storage included in the package is a huge plus.
Ive been testing both since the day Gemini ultra is out and it loses against chatgpt in just about every single use Case except coding for me because i simply dont use it but even in Math and physics, chatgpt was pretty much always right and Gemini was wrong most of the time, sometimes even stated that what Gemini was saying was correct even tough it was wrong, so i really hope 1.5 will get a lot better because simply a longer context window is useless If most answers are wrong
think I'll take a pass on paid versions of AI atm, just wait 6 months till the dust settles and the wrinkles get Irond out, great video BTW, subbed and very like.
unsurprisingly, still doesn't beat GPT-4.
gracias por tus videos eres una crack! :3
Get yourself someone who understands the market very well and is also professional in placing trades. That's the key
Yesss!! Bitcoin going up is good for the entire market. My largest holding is also xrp, and I actually root for bitcoin to do well, because history shows xrp lags behind it.
The lectures and strategies he presented, saved me big time from the disaster
He's mostly on Telegrams, using the user name.
BrinIvan1 💯 ..that's it
Mistral 2.5 dolphin. Go go go.. who doesnt love dolphins
i somehow sense a lot of bias here.
Why is asking my social security number? No thanks gemini
9:04 What a garbage! Gemini is woke AF 😅
yes lol, idk how can you put (I mean make it act like that when generating images) that response intentionally in
woke why?
@@surajpasuparthyIt sort of pre-modifies the image prompt without the User's input. For socio-political purposes.
thats why its preffy from Gen Zero.
This is like comparing a lecture to a 5th grader. which is bull sh*t. let's use our brains please. Gemini is still in development!!
Big LOL @ this channel. The ability to move from selling trend to trend and pretend to be an expert at them is quite hilarious. This video appeared on my feed and (as I do with all super Youtuby thumbnails) went to check the history of the channel out and wow what a non-surprise. What is funny is usually channels like this try to cover and "blend" the transitions from grift to grift. But this one just moves on and as if it was never there.
Went from hawking NFTs to questioning them in 7 videos, then no mention of NFT since. Started with the "selling online courses" trend to farming engagement, to bitcoin/crypto (Yikes) then to the current era...AI chatbots. 😂 Will she stick to this genre? Will she go viral and become known as an "AI content creator"? Or will she inevitably move on when the next get independently rich trend starts? TUNE IN next time on Brie Kirbyson!
ChatGPT 4 is more better than Gemini Ultra
*-GuardianLLC*
nice LLC name wanna merge.
God, boring.
Gemini read your “portrait” as portrait of the person - specify dimensions next time 🫡