That’s just his Pro mode as opposed the General Public mode. Even Jensen Huang has a Pro mode in which he swaps his leather jacket for a suit & tie dress up.
"We understand the importance of security in industrial applications. While the HT90 offers a comprehensive remote print management system and surveillance, the printer is fully prepared for a completely offline operation. You can even disconnect the Wi-Fi module from the printer. We do not collect information about your prints or your printer’s surroundings. No matter whether you’re developing a new-generation space shuttle or just printing tools for your workshop, no organization should be interested in this information."
This is one reason I picked Prusa over everyone else, especially Bambu. Bambu's TOS actually allows them to terminate your account for any reason, given your printer serial number is tied to your account and offline firmware updates are not possible, if they terminate your account, you'll never be able to update the firmware again.
@@Kastman82 You can disable Wi-Fi in the menu, and without the antenna, it won't be able to connect to anything anyway. Having the ESP soldered on the board is perfect for 95% of people, while having to manufacture a separate board without it would just be an unnecessary extra cost. The MK4 has its separate ESP module on the outside, but it's not exactly an elegant solution and potentially brings other issues with it. Lastly, all their printers come with Ethernet ports.
its still far from being worth 12k€ what the fuck... its like 5k€ MAX, and that is already super high for what you get... you could get like 3 V-Core 4.0 500 IDEX and make them high temp compatible and till have money left to get them built and configured...
Guys, don't forget: we can all build capable machines for less. But for that we have to spend time and then we still don't have warranty and customer support. All industry cares about is reliability, speed and ease of use.
@@TJ13062010 yes industry care about reliability but I see non of it from it unfortunately. Prusa are good but they don’t offer enough features for industry to use other than basic prototypes but then again if that all they look for this is pretty good. If you want to use it for small batch production then not so much
@@nebuchadnezzar47 That’s just not true. I saw the printer live in Prague last week (and mine is arriving soon) and for the quality you get (designed and built in EU), the kind of support and considering what the printer is capable of, it is definitely worth the money. Shure, it is not comparable with the other Prusa printers made for hobbyists and enthusiasts, but it is simply not made to be compared with them. Judging about a printer you have never seen live before and reducing the value by more than 50% is just not fair for everyone who worked hard to design and built this machine. As far as I know it is open source and entirely made in EU, built-quality is awesome, and it’s reliable and it works, that’s what counts these days.
Someone in marketing almost cleaned Joe up, but the man still looks more like a force of nature. On the other hand this looks like a serious solution in rapid prototyping and maybe even some specific small scale production of insulating brackets
VW programmed their cars to avoid fine particle cancer causing emissions tests so they were able to sell cars that have a terrible impact on people's health.
@@robertauerbach2571 500 on the hotend and 155 on the bed should be more than enough for pretty much any PEEK filament, not sure which one you were looking at?
I'm a Bambulab user, but I'm really happy to see that Prusa is always at the forefront of tech and not just like a lot of other Chinese companies that just try to imitate proper products. I'm speaking here about Ender, ELEGOO, Anycubic and so on.
I had the luck to be in the HT90 production facility in Hradec Kralove and saw the prints. Guys - for those +- 7700 Euro Youll get amazing machine. I would really agree that its "Prusa of Engineering level" I was really amazed by prints from PPS material - they are completely on par with molded parts - they dont even break in layers but across them! And thin "neck" of 4x10mm was able to hold up to 250kg of load. Amazing materials. I am already preparing our company management for this expense, as it will pay for itself within few months (automotive industry). And to be honest - its not that super expensive, that it would be completely out of reach for personal use as well. When people can pay 2000 euro for a phone - value of this printer can be justified ... So my big thanks to whole Prusa (Trilab) team who achieved this. It is a bombshell! And as experienced print guy, i would put my hand into fire over this product - and I just saw a demo and their print farm! :D
Why are people getting bent out of shape over the price? It's a COMMERCIAL printer, not everything needs to be aimed at consumers, and not everything has to be priced to compete with cheap but popular knockoff brands.
@@Baldavier In production environments, the Drywise dryers with the Pre-Heater are normally used. So I would say yes, to use a Drywise dryer should be no problem with this printer.
It would be nicer to have the dry box either integrated, or able to be electrically connected. That way the printer can control and monitor the filament box’s temperature, and maybe also monitor the amount of filament left.
A new professional level delta 3D printer was definitely not at the top of my list of expectations for 2024 - but it makes very good sense! Today's processing power allows us to remove vibrations with adjustment for height, and there is nothing that beats delta kinematics for lateral speed and efficient stepper motion, and of course vertical motion can be near instant. We love the open build plate access that comes with the Prusa i3 design, and a deltabot can be even more accessible - from three sides. We can't wait to see all the things people do with these beastly machines!
Some other company is Kickstarting that right now, but with a CEO barely out of college. I would pay $1K over their asking price to get the same thing from Prusa and know the company that made it has been around continuously since the early days.
@@__S__435 micronics is two college graduates and their professor, I would not trust them especially on safety. They show off that they started out in a college apartment, running a milling machine less that a metre from a bed with nowhere near enough adequate space around it, they even joke about how they got woken up by metal shavings in the bed. They basically used a college apartment as a workshop with machines that should only be used in workshops. Considering their lack of care with their own safety and the safety of others in the building, I would not trust them.
I don't see what makes this printer more capable of doing these high-performance filaments than a lot of the other printers claiming so and doing it very half-assed like the Funmat HT that has the same 90C chamber temp and a slightly hotter bed. It will come nowhere close to a proper high-temp printer (though it is ofc significantly cheaper)
@@aronseptianto8142 I would actually say it is worse for PEI / Ultem. PEEK doesn't benefit as much being printed super hot as the main issue is crystallization, while an amorphous thermoplastic like Ultem really wants to be printed relatively close to tg. I have printed more than a few kilos of PEI on a proper high-temp printer (Minifactory Ultra) and we ran Ultem 1010 at around 215-220C bed & chamber temp to get the best performance. Ultem 9085 which is a PEI alloyed with PC and Siloxane polymers (IIRC) prints at a bit lower temperature, and we printed that at 170-175C bed & chamber temp.
Well done Prusa. Can we get a version that is not for industrial printing, but for hobbyist. I love my FLSUN delta, but it’s the only choice out there. Something comparable could be great. Rather than release the design to open source, which Prusa has been leading, I’d prefer Prusa directly produced the version for the rest of us. I am tired of some folks ripping open source to create their business, with little to give back.
My first printer build was a Kossel Mini and I have measured every print since by it's print quality way back in 2014. I moved on to larger print area with my most recent build being a 350 x 350 Voron 2.4, but I have no doubt a properly designed delta could surpass it's speed and print quality. I would love to see the Nextruder become available to purchase separately as it appears to be the best designs on market.
@@SanderMakes His PEEK Benchy you mean? That bunch of unprinted filament strands, because he couldn't print it? But apart from that, that tier list he made is very nice to have.
Prusa entering the pro market was not on my bingo card for 2024. But super happy to see you did. I would love to see a professional open source IDEX printer between 3K-7K as well as a prosumer model as well for small-medium engineering/product development companies.
am I the only one that has seen prusa sell these more business orientated delta printers already for many years now? Everyone here seems to be surprised by them for some reason ...
This is really awesome! It's a cheap and fast printer for high temp materials. The only complaint I would have is a small square build area (it's about 225x225mm if you want to print a square object). So, Pantheon HS3, which costs pretty much the same (well, depends where you live), is a much bigger printer that can reliably print engineering materials like CF/GF Nylons and CF/GF ABS/ASA. However, it might not be good for PEEK, and other high temp materials, where Prusa Pro HT90 will be the winner.
@@MisterMakerNL if you're surprised by the price, then it's not for you. It's not a consumer product. Companies buy this. Not an average Joe that lives in a basement.
interesting choice going with a Delta printer. Would thought they would go with a core system for speed and stability. My big Anycubic Delta worked great for a while but due to some inherent problems with Delta type printers would need a good amount of tinkering. Good luck with the new printer
While this printer is not for me as hobbyist, it is running on a Duet with klipper. I'm still hoping there will be a core XY from Prusa, maybe even inspired by opensource projects like Voron or Ratrig to eventually replace the bedslingers line. Please make is Jo.
he can not compete in core xy so he is off after a new customer base he will not move from his bed slingers he can not claim his glory and name on his shirt with a core xy lol
@@thediscman123 The MK series is also based on other opensource. The XL is a nice Core XY, on the expensive side but fills a niche as multi toolhead printer.
@@thediscman123 I have been eyeing those Voron clones, they are getting very cheap and appear to be good enough. But since I got my XL, I haven't had use for a second printer.
in the yt channel strange parts they show a core xy prusa for 3d printing farms in development, the prints are not that tall but the automation part of the printer look very cool
sub £10,000 plus tax and shipping in the game again not likely. they have fleeced the the ordinary punter and been well overtaken in that market now they are off for businesses all you prusa fan boys won't be getting this one.
@@thediscman123 Definitely in ONE of the games, this time affordable industrial 3D printing, which is usually much more expensive than that. Let's wait for their next "mainstream" printer, I feel like some Panda might get a bit of a kick in the butt when that happens 😏
@@finlay9260 it was that panda that finally moved 3d printing forward instead of stagnant and slow race to the bottom. They gave the whole 3d printing companies a huge kick up the rear end and made the lazy repetitive companies think for a change
@@thediscman123 And it was Prusa who did the exact same many years ago with the MK2 and MK3? I don't see the difference tbh, and I'm convinced Prusa isn't planning to step away from this mentality. Let's just wait and see what comes next, from both sides.
Finally someone gives us the right to a buy an industrial grade machine(i suppose it is) .Democratising the technology for people is a good thing.Only the price is a litle too much for me.I could sell my car 🙄 Grtz Belgium
As an engineer (3rd year student) one thing missing with these FDM printers is easy watertight/airtight parts and very occasionally resolution. It’s come up as an issue multiple times for me. Mostly the former. I think this could be solved without resorting to a resin printer by Prusa. One produce a highly accurate mini FDM printer within the existing machine. Something modular maybe. So like you change the nozzle on the Main machine but the xyz axis is different so it’s way more accurate, also maybe this would require a specialised filament they could charge a premium for that had very low thermal expansion. The second thing could be a separate post processing machine that basically intelligently melted the layers into a homogeneous surface automatically. I’ve tried this with a heat gun and and a blow torch and have ruined many parts, I usually end up option with coating the entire thing with epoxy resin and that’s annoying. I’m also aware you can make watertight and possibly airtight prints with certain setting but from what I’ve seen those techniques have draw backs and limitations and also require a lot of trial and error.
I don't mean to offend you, but did you try any prusa printer? Because with mine (which is a FDM btw), I never had any issue making watertight parts. The settings are not complicated, it's just a matter of walls / infill. If you meant however an assembly of multiple part being watertight, again, It's a matter of tolerance, and prusa printers are really good at it. However I agree, there are lots of trial and errors, but the good thing is, once the setting is done, their machine are so well tuned workhorses, you'll end up with good result everytime. It's bit of a shame prusa is slowly leaving the consumer market. I'm glad for their success, but I'm sad we won't see any new affordable gems like the prusa mini in the future...
I mean, it's a great printer, but is it that much better than XL to be priced at 11'490 Euros? I really miss times when prusa made innovative and affordable printers for hobbysts
Why do people compare printers that will literally melt or burn their motors before continuing to print? This machine is designed to withstand heat, it is not a normal printer. The new Prusa is great for engineering materials, it is not for a pla bros.
@@wildniscamper7276 90 degrees inside the chamber and surely the motors of that industrial prusa can withstand more than 200 degrees, perhaps they are water cooled. What a normal domestic printer motor can withstand up to 100 degrees in operation in some cases of printers with good quality motors
In a delta the motors for movement do not have to be in the chamber, and the extruded motor has its own cooling system (see the air hose) Very nice engineering
@@sasukedh i know, is was working for eos and voxeljet.. i don't know what to think of that printer. to me, fdm is not good for endproducts or usable parts at all.. sls or slm with pa2200 is the best process to me.. yeah could be watercooled but i guess they moved the motors out of the chamber.. not easy to handle 90°C in that chamber
@@wildniscamper7276 Yes, it is very possible that they have removed the motors from the camera and used gimbals, for example, to move them. It also depends on the material that can be handled, although it is true that SLS laser casting is more optimal since the laser melts much better. The problem with SLS is that the pollution residue must be more difficult to handle and probably more toxic. The material they need is not as extreme as it should be and that's why taking an FDM route is quite plausible from the way I see it, I also have a small laboratory and I make printers and we test materials by the way.
I do wonder why they didn’t opt for an IDEX. While the XL is a great toolchanger it definitely isn’t on an industrial level or capable of stuff like Nylon, PSU, Peek, ultem etc. An IDEX would allow use for things like dissolving supports to really maximize what engineers can do. By sticking to a single material you’re both using more of the costly materials and also restricting your models to those with manually removable supports or single material
They are different printers for different uses, they just both happen to be delta printers. The V400 can only manage 300 C on the nozzle and 110 C on the bed with no chamber heater. This Prusa HT90 can manage 500 C on the nozzle, 155 C on the bed and 90 C actively heated chamber. The V400 is meant for the consumer market with relatively low end materials, like PLA and PETG. The HT90 is meant for engineering materials, nylon, PC, PEI, PEEK, etc. materials that you couldn’t print on a V400. The HT90 is also meant for companies or professional engineers, the V400 is meant for hobbyists, you can’t really compare them. If you are comparing them on how well they can print PLA or PETG you are missing the whole point of the HT90.
First thank to have took the time to respond secondly I get that the Prusa Pro HT90 and the V400 are different beasts, especially in terms of price ^^ and certainly in term of features and capabilities like the interchangeable heads and this 500°C nozzle temperature and the wider range of printable materials . However, as an happy owner of the V400, I’m still interested in a comparison because Despite their differences, there are notable similarities. The V400 can print at speeds up to 600 mm/s and has a build volume of 300 x 300 x 410 mm, which is quite comparable to the HT90. Also, the HT90’s max acceleration of 20,000 mm/s² is impressive , V400’s performance is still quite similar to it ( in the speed and quality regard) for its price . What interest me is to explore what Prusa has done with their slicer approach i'm sure their innovations could provide valuable insights on how to optimize the use of my V400.( with i hope better slicing approach to delta fdm printer ) There’s always something to learn from Prusa’s high-quality approach to 3D printing, and i hope their new printer could inspired the others fdm delta ecosystem.
I have a question: How do you see your printer in comparison to the 22IDEX which costs roughly 50% more but offers the additional feature of being an Idex and also supporting non planar printing to a degree.
it says in the website it'll take 2 weeks to process since ordering it's not a pre-release announcement. The man literally showed it in deployment in 3 different places
They are "Ultimaking" themselves back into the high profit, but very low volume industrial corner with the MK4, the XL, and now this... I don't own a Bambu Lab printer, but i do have several Vorons, a Rat Rig VCore 3 and even a MK3S+. I also own a 2016-era self-sourced Delta Kossel. The MK4 is just way too expensive for what it offers, there are no excuses anymore.
@Romancelanguagespassion and that's why i was saying i would like a smaller and cheaper version that lacks the higher temps. I know its for professionals, but would be nice to see a prosumer version of it.
@@dacryon3755 yeah then people will bitch and moan about how the other Chinese company can do it for much less and faster. There's no end to the negativity.
@brisance true, have a friend who says prusa should be ashamed of their prices and their printed parts. Meanwhile he is excited for voron printers with their prices/printed parts. Also loves creality due to their prices
Im sorry but Why do you have to select the voltage when ordering. This is an absolute no go for such a machine. It has to work reliably and decrease opportunities for user error.
Pro tip for a Pro video: Proofread the CC because I’m pretty sure this person at 1:10 didn’t intend to say “flowers overhangs”. My 2 Yens. - ArnaudThe100YenEngineer
This is fine but Prusa has a very hard time keeping things in stock. Their Ultem filament is out of stock already. And CF PETG and PC is hardly ever available so it is not dependable. Also, they leave so many things they promised on the back burner to be completely forgotten. One example is their smart box for the enclosure which was announced years ago and is nowhere in sight.
I guess if you're willing to pay $200 for 1KG of PEK or $400 for a roll of ULTEM, then your also willing to pay $10K for a printer. I'm curious, how many folks routinely print with those filaments? And, it's not as if there aren't a number of different engineering filaments that can be printed on affordable core XY printers. If this printer performs as advertised, it is clearly targeted at a very small group of users who need PEK and ULTEM prints. I doubt it does much for the bottom line for prusa.
You have it backwards. Very few organizations/people are printing these expensive materials, because the cost of getting into them easily exceeds $50+K. What Prusa is offering, is the ability to do so at 1/5th the cost. That is the value proposition. When there is demand, supply witll match it. Josef Prusa majored in Economics btw.
@@brisancedo you print with either of those materials? If not, then do you plan on buying this machine so you can affordably print with them? I do several structural engineering parts with ABS-GF and they print great and are very strong. Not as good with chemical resistance as the others though.
@@ChippWalters yes I will be buying a machine to test. Everyone wants a do-it-all printer that is cheap and good. But we'll never get there if no one supports the current product on the market. Advancements always come step-wise. The original 911 Porsche is an objectively terrible car, when viewed with a modern lens. But the current model wouldn't exist if no one bought the previous ones.
@@fofopads4450Do you measure performance only based on speed ? I use this for engineering. I usually need a good tuned temperature (PID) and a solid structure. Speed is not a huge consideration as long as I can print Abs to 150-200 mm/s. I rarely need a something faster. In the case of the Mk4, it just doesn't give me value that justifies its price point in my opinion. No nozzle brush but it probes with the nozzle load (unreliable first layer), no PID routine, the enclosure comes with no abs or heat resistant parts replacement for the printer, it comes with no camera, no led light, the wifi printing interface is not polished or was closed to finish when I bought my machines. The thermistor had faulty reading on 4 units (it was solved thanks to their amazing customer service). The hotend has a very limited heating capacity, so for material that requires a good amount of heat (280C). I have to slowdown quite significantly because of that. The idler gets sloppy rapidly. I had to reprint it already for all 4 units. Don't get me wrong, they work. It's just that I have to do engineering, not tinkering... If I had to repurchase units for prototyping like I am doing, I would buy something else.
No not really, the FLsun S1's temp rating are too low for printing with extra high temp materials like PEI and PEEK, which is basically what categorizes this printer as a true industrial printer.
Very exciting design, always loved the Delta printers with their more exotic kinematics. However, isn't 90 degree chamber temp a bit cold for PEEK? From what I've heard, especially in an industrial context, 140 degree+ would be more appropriate for such a demanding material.
3DXTech recommends a 70 - 140 C chamber for their PEEK and filamentive recommends > 80 C, so whilst on the low end it should be enough, especially for small and medium sized parts. Higher temperatures are better though.
@@conorstewart2214 Indeed, for small parts it will most likely be fine, but medium to large (I am thinking parts with much longer print times and weirder geometries) will become an issue (but that's just how 3dprinting is in general, eh?). Also you won't get optimal layer adhesion, which is a bigger problem because if you're using PEEK in the first place it's for its outstanding properties as a superpolymer. Just to be clear, I haven't personally printed PEEK (yet), I don't have a machine capable of that. Fartest I've gone is Carbon-nylon (which is still very fun). However, I do know people who print PEEK on a regular basis, so what I say mostly comes from what they said + my own research on the topic. And I still think this printer is a pretty impressive machine that has a big potential.
All the bambu bots in here complaining about price. This isn't a regular hobby printer that's designed to print only cheap hobby material like PLA, ASA, ABS, etc. It's an industrial printer designed to print industrial materials that 99% of hobby printer's cant do. Industrial materials like PEKK, PEEK, ULTEM require an industrial printer with very high temps. Printers that print these materials often cost more than $40k, sometimes even over $100k. Prusa out here doing it for just a fraction of that. Even a $2500 bambu X1E only has a 60c heated chamber. and 300c hotend. This has 90c chamber and 500c hotend.
Actually, it is pretty expensive for what it is. It would be a steal if it was 5 years ago, but you can get more for less. I thought the price was good until i saw that there was no dual lifting nozzle system. Even the very first commercially available fdm 3d had that in the 90s. Also 90c is like the minimum for peek and I wouldn't even entertain printing ultem that low. 90C will give you perfect prints WITH ABS and PC, but nothing more. The Funmat pro 310 stomps all over this thing. Better specs and cheaper. I guess this is faster? But that speed means nothing if you have spend forever removing supports.
@@AnnikaFPV lmao the Funmat pro 310 can only reach 300c on the hotend and can't even print the advanced material that the HT90 can. What are you even on about? The best it can print is nylon which virtually any 3d printer could do that. The HT90 can print PEK/PEEK/ULTEM.
Just a warning to anyone out there that got excited about the idea of printing Peek. I have a fair amount of experience with high performance materials like peek and ultem for engineering applications, and I can tell you that a 90C chamber is just not hot enough. Even with a bed that gets that hot you're going to have a hard time making anything bigger than a benchy that has good layer adhesion and meet any real tolerance requirements. I agree those stats are perfect for ABS polycarbonate and HTN Nylon, and I'm probably going to get this printer but definitely not for peek or utlem.
@deathspawn54 Not trying to discredit the machine or prusa. Like I said, I want this machine. Just some helpful advice to anyone wanting to print large accurate parts out of peek or utlem will have serious challenges with those temperature stats. Again I know, I've done this industry. Just trying to be helpful to someone that is out there trying to find a HT machine.
@@brocklydoodle I saw another video of it where they show some medium large prints that seemed to look really good, but nothing super large, I guess the print area isn't that big either though
You can tell Josef is getting more mature, he switched out just a T-shirt to a T-shirt and sport jacket.
Slap a sports jacket on a 10 year old and suddenly he's ready to buy alcohol and tobacco.
That’s just his Pro mode as opposed the General Public mode. Even Jensen Huang has a Pro mode in which he swaps his leather jacket for a suit & tie dress up.
"We understand the importance of security in industrial applications. While the HT90 offers a comprehensive remote print management system and surveillance, the printer is fully prepared for a completely offline operation. You can even disconnect the Wi-Fi module from the printer. We do not collect information about your prints or your printer’s surroundings. No matter whether you’re developing a new-generation space shuttle or just printing tools for your workshop, no organization should be interested in this information."
This is one reason I picked Prusa over everyone else, especially Bambu. Bambu's TOS actually allows them to terminate your account for any reason, given your printer serial number is tied to your account and offline firmware updates are not possible, if they terminate your account, you'll never be able to update the firmware again.
I wish the Prusa XL had this feature but the Wi-FI module is soldered on the board there.
I hope you can use Ethernet instead. Wifi is a lot of trouble for something that doesn't have to move around.
Name a 3d printer that cannot work offline? This "feature" isn't special.
@@Kastman82 You can disable Wi-Fi in the menu, and without the antenna, it won't be able to connect to anything anyway. Having the ESP soldered on the board is perfect for 95% of people, while having to manufacture a separate board without it would just be an unnecessary extra cost.
The MK4 has its separate ESP module on the outside, but it's not exactly an elegant solution and potentially brings other issues with it.
Lastly, all their printers come with Ethernet ports.
This is finally a case where a tech product using the word 'pro' actually seems appropriate
its still far from being worth 12k€
what the fuck...
its like 5k€ MAX, and that is already super high for what you get...
you could get like 3 V-Core 4.0 500 IDEX and make them high temp compatible and till have money left to get them built and configured...
you can buy like 10 Flsun S1 printers that will be better and faster lol
Guys, don't forget: we can all build capable machines for less. But for that we have to spend time and then we still don't have warranty and customer support. All industry cares about is reliability, speed and ease of use.
@@TJ13062010 yes industry care about reliability but I see non of it from it unfortunately. Prusa are good but they don’t offer enough features for industry to use other than basic prototypes but then again if that all they look for this is pretty good. If you want to use it for small batch production then not so much
@@nebuchadnezzar47 That’s just not true. I saw the printer live in Prague last week (and mine is arriving soon) and for the quality you get (designed and built in EU), the kind of support and considering what the printer is capable of, it is definitely worth the money. Shure, it is not comparable with the other Prusa printers made for hobbyists and enthusiasts, but it is simply not made to be compared with them.
Judging about a printer you have never seen live before and reducing the value by more than 50% is just not fair for everyone who worked hard to design and built this machine.
As far as I know it is open source and entirely made in EU, built-quality is awesome, and it’s reliable and it works, that’s what counts these days.
Someone in marketing almost cleaned Joe up, but the man still looks more like a force of nature.
On the other hand this looks like a serious solution in rapid prototyping and maybe even some specific small scale production of insulating brackets
His look caught me off guard some reason, didn't know it was him at first.
But yea, this is a shift in the standard for sure.
This printer takes Prusa to a new level! The future looks bright!
Prusa has a long history and a great reputation in 3D printing, which is why I chose it
🥰😍🤩
The most important question has not been answered. It's not a kit. Are there any gummy bears included anyway? They should at that price.
What price
It's meant for engineers, will probably come with a pack of dubbel zout.
Include a bottle of wine for that price
Damn. If even the Germans are happy with it, I'm sold 😂
😂😂😂😂😂
Im german, and im very happy to hear it.
Look how happy I am:
._.
@@leinadreign3510 That's about the happiest I've ever seen a German look
@@richfromtang It ain't for PLA bud.
VW programmed their cars to avoid fine particle cancer causing emissions tests so they were able to sell cars that have a terrible impact on people's health.
This thing is legitimately beautiful. Well done, Prusa.
Haha I really like how in the product presentation for the "professional" printer it's still Josef in his maker T-shirt but now with a suit on top xD
Can't wait to show this to my boss tomorrow.
PEI and PEEK printing fast is a extraordinary feat, good on you prusa
@@robertauerbach2571 500 on the hotend and 155 on the bed should be more than enough for pretty much any PEEK filament, not sure which one you were looking at?
@@robertauerbach2571 500c is plenty for PEEK AND PEKK
I'm a Bambulab user, but I'm really happy to see that Prusa is always at the forefront of tech and not just like a lot of other Chinese companies that just try to imitate proper products. I'm speaking here about Ender, ELEGOO, Anycubic and so on.
Are they at the forefront though? Bambulabs completely blindsided them.
@@Festivejelly they did, yes, but I like to see they are still fight to bring new stuff out
Really excited about this !
man’s gonna go on a rampage once he gets his hands on one
I had the luck to be in the HT90 production facility in Hradec Kralove and saw the prints. Guys - for those +- 7700 Euro Youll get amazing machine. I would really agree that its "Prusa of Engineering level"
I was really amazed by prints from PPS material - they are completely on par with molded parts - they dont even break in layers but across them! And thin "neck" of 4x10mm was able to hold up to 250kg of load. Amazing materials.
I am already preparing our company management for this expense, as it will pay for itself within few months (automotive industry). And to be honest - its not that super expensive, that it would be completely out of reach for personal use as well. When people can pay 2000 euro for a phone - value of this printer can be justified ...
So my big thanks to whole Prusa (Trilab) team who achieved this. It is a bombshell! And as experienced print guy, i would put my hand into fire over this product - and I just saw a demo and their print farm! :D
Nice to hear your experiencr, but how many peoples do you know who spend 2000 euros on a phone
That makes no sense. The high temp parts they have shown are not even semi-cristalline so they suffer from isotropic properties
Why are people getting bent out of shape over the price? It's a COMMERCIAL printer, not everything needs to be aimed at consumers, and not everything has to be priced to compete with cheap but popular knockoff brands.
I'm surprised it isn't configured with a filament dryer that can be printed off of
True but can print direct from a dry box like most engineers will already be doing?
@@Baldavier In production environments, the Drywise dryers with the Pre-Heater are normally used.
So I would say yes, to use a Drywise dryer should be no problem with this printer.
It would be nicer to have the dry box either integrated, or able to be electrically connected. That way the printer can control and monitor the filament box’s temperature, and maybe also monitor the amount of filament left.
This is the right way. Very happy to see this kind of improvement
A new professional level delta 3D printer was definitely not at the top of my list of expectations for 2024 - but it makes very good sense! Today's processing power allows us to remove vibrations with adjustment for height, and there is nothing that beats delta kinematics for lateral speed and efficient stepper motion, and of course vertical motion can be near instant. We love the open build plate access that comes with the Prusa i3 design, and a deltabot can be even more accessible - from three sides.
We can't wait to see all the things people do with these beastly machines!
Absolutely amazing work Prusa 3D. This is amazing.
Marketing videos usually are!
you buying one then
I'd like to see a Prusa SLS
Some other company is Kickstarting that right now, but with a CEO barely out of college. I would pay $1K over their asking price to get the same thing from Prusa and know the company that made it has been around continuously since the early days.
@@__S__435 micronics is two college graduates and their professor, I would not trust them especially on safety. They show off that they started out in a college apartment, running a milling machine less that a metre from a bed with nowhere near enough adequate space around it, they even joke about how they got woken up by metal shavings in the bed. They basically used a college apartment as a workshop with machines that should only be used in workshops.
Considering their lack of care with their own safety and the safety of others in the building, I would not trust them.
Since it's prusa it would probably cost over 50k.
@conorstewart2214 it's college. Such behaviour is expected from passionate engineers.
Give the people what we want!
woah, i did NOT see this coming
They bought Trilab that made industrial delta printers almost four years ago. Not sure how this release can be a surprise to anyone..
@@Akegata42 ah I didn't know they did that
Just means you’re new to this space, took them long enough
🤠 Congrats to Prusa and love this HT90, it ROCKS !
Saw the machine in person at rapid, I was really impressed with the equipment! Good work Prusa
Very awesome machine!
this looks way better than that "Pro" POS from france that Thomas reviewed recently
well done, keep up the good work
I'll definitely need to start saving.........big time!
what for tho, it's not like you're gonna print ultem anytime soon
Unless you're a multi millionaire, but you said you need to save? That's stupid. a
Looks at the flsun s1 for 1/7th of the cost
This is very exciting! A printer that's actually capable of using engineering filament, not just saying "I mean, technically it'll do PEEK".
Yes, because it can't do PEEK at all. PEEK needs 133 degree chamber temperatures.
I don't see what makes this printer more capable of doing these high-performance filaments than a lot of the other printers claiming so and doing it very half-assed like the Funmat HT that has the same 90C chamber temp and a slightly hotter bed. It will come nowhere close to a proper high-temp printer (though it is ofc significantly cheaper)
i mean, it still probably is 'technically it can do PEEK' 90C is high but not that high for PEEK. Good video btw
@@aronseptianto8142 I would actually say it is worse for PEI / Ultem. PEEK doesn't benefit as much being printed super hot as the main issue is crystallization, while an amorphous thermoplastic like Ultem really wants to be printed relatively close to tg.
I have printed more than a few kilos of PEI on a proper high-temp printer (Minifactory Ultra) and we ran Ultem 1010 at around 215-220C bed & chamber temp to get the best performance. Ultem 9085 which is a PEI alloyed with PC and Siloxane polymers (IIRC) prints at a bit lower temperature, and we printed that at 170-175C bed & chamber temp.
@@HackCausality If it can't do peek then why did they show it at 0:25?
Well done Prusa. Can we get a version that is not for industrial printing, but for hobbyist. I love my FLSUN delta, but it’s the only choice out there. Something comparable could be great. Rather than release the design to open source, which Prusa has been leading, I’d prefer Prusa directly produced the version for the rest of us. I am tired of some folks ripping open source to create their business, with little to give back.
Thank you for making great products!
for me, prusa is number one
This sounds absolutely awesome! ❤
LOVE Delta printers
My first printer build was a Kossel Mini and I have measured every print since by it's print quality way back in 2014. I moved on to larger print area with my most recent build being a 350 x 350 Voron 2.4, but I have no doubt a properly designed delta could surpass it's speed and print quality. I would love to see the Nextruder become available to purchase separately as it appears to be the best designs on market.
Babe, wake up, prusa just dropped a new printer. Lets preorder and check back in 3 years.
the printer/company is over 5 years old, prusa bought it in 2021
🤣
BambuCCP has entered the chat.
The HT90 is available now to order and ship and has been for a while. No preorder. Bad bambu bot.
found the bambuboi
Super cool printer and the prints off of it look gorgeous.
Still, anything over 5k for an FDM printer is just absolutely wild to me.
I am expecting a family pack of gummy bears given the price.
I'd order one if it would have a filament changer. Printing PA12 without a support material is nightmare IMO. I hope this will the next level.
I want to see it print a Benchy in some crazy material.
Zack Freedman got you covered
@@SanderMakes His PEEK Benchy you mean? That bunch of unprinted filament strands, because he couldn't print it? But apart from that, that tier list he made is very nice to have.
I Can't Wait to get one of these
I'm happy to see this.
Prusa entering the pro market was not on my bingo card for 2024. But super happy to see you did. I would love to see a professional open source IDEX printer between 3K-7K as well as a prosumer model as well for small-medium engineering/product development companies.
am I the only one that has seen prusa sell these more business orientated delta printers already for many years now? Everyone here seems to be surprised by them for some reason ...
This is really awesome! It's a cheap and fast printer for high temp materials. The only complaint I would have is a small square build area (it's about 225x225mm if you want to print a square object). So, Pantheon HS3, which costs pretty much the same (well, depends where you live), is a much bigger printer that can reliably print engineering materials like CF/GF Nylons and CF/GF ABS/ASA. However, it might not be good for PEEK, and other high temp materials, where Prusa Pro HT90 will be the winner.
99% of the people in these threads wont be buying one so does it matter how good or not it is they wont benefit from it
@@thediscman123 well, yes, so what's your point?
Cheap? Only 11k
@@MisterMakerNL if you're surprised by the price, then it's not for you. It's not a consumer product. Companies buy this. Not an average Joe that lives in a basement.
I would have liked to hear the german words instead of the overdub. German is very descriptive with precise semantic nuances.
Very nice.
Sadly above my budget.
Though as a hobbyist I'm curious if it makes industrial levels of noise or would be feasible for home use.
Delta is just such a interesting and underrated technology, awesome to see you launch a Delta 3D printer as well !
They owned trilab, it's just their first one that's under the PRUSA brand
Deltas have a lot of benefits but they're also much more difficult and expesnive to get right than cartesian printers.
@@oliverer3 exactly, but that kinda makes them interesting tho (not the wallet ouch but the difficulty xD)
@@Parodidical yeah, it aint 100% prusa but i believe trilab aint bad either just havent heard about them that much
Industrial printers is where the money is at. Good for Prusa.
Wow, looking great!
Will this printer also be open source like the others?
Glad delta printers are coming back. Though with they made a more affordable core xy machine than the prusa xl. Maybe the prusa mk5?
Delta are like the new-old flying gantry.
MK series are probably going to remain Cartesian. Prusa isn't Creality where everything consumer-facing is an Ender.
$10k for a single hot end? No soluble support? Pretty sure the base F123 starts around $6k.
Not having a second extruder for an industrial printer seems like a downside.
interesting choice going with a Delta printer. Would thought they would go with a core system for speed and stability. My big Anycubic Delta worked great for a while but due to some inherent problems with Delta type printers would need a good amount of tinkering.
Good luck with the new printer
1:46 Just curious, why was the file ".gcode" and not ".bgcode"? I thought everyone using Prusa printers with the latest slicers already switched?
Whoa, what a neat printer!
❤che bomba di stampante! Grande prusa
Add a 4th axis to the printer so will have a square build platform.
While this printer is not for me as hobbyist, it is running on a Duet with klipper. I'm still hoping there will be a core XY from Prusa, maybe even inspired by opensource projects like Voron or Ratrig to eventually replace the bedslingers line.
Please make is Jo.
he can not compete in core xy so he is off after a new customer base he will not move from his bed slingers he can not claim his glory and name on his shirt with a core xy lol
@@thediscman123 The MK series is also based on other opensource. The XL is a nice Core XY, on the expensive side but fills a niche as multi toolhead printer.
not for most people and very expensive. if he sourced more parts from china he could bring his prices much lower and be more competitive
@@thediscman123 I have been eyeing those Voron clones, they are getting very cheap and appear to be good enough. But since I got my XL, I haven't had use for a second printer.
in the yt channel strange parts they show a core xy prusa for 3d printing farms in development, the prints are not that tall but the automation part of the printer look very cool
Aww yeah!! A delta printer, no less!
why does the XL not have a heated enclosure?
Probably the electronics are rated for it
To no compete against this model
Wow, very impressive. I wonder if we will see any trickle down into a consumer Prusa delta printer.
Damn, prusa comes back from the past and into the game again. This looks awesome. 90C chamber is a game changer. Is there a bigger version?
sub £10,000 plus tax and shipping in the game again not likely. they have fleeced the the ordinary punter and been well overtaken in that market now they are off for businesses all you prusa fan boys won't be getting this one.
@@thediscman123 Definitely in ONE of the games, this time affordable industrial 3D printing, which is usually much more expensive than that.
Let's wait for their next "mainstream" printer, I feel like some Panda might get a bit of a kick in the butt when that happens 😏
@@finlay9260 it was that panda that finally moved 3d printing forward instead of stagnant and slow race to the bottom. They gave the whole 3d printing companies a huge kick up the rear end and made the lazy repetitive companies think for a change
@@thediscman123 And it was Prusa who did the exact same many years ago with the MK2 and MK3? I don't see the difference tbh, and I'm convinced Prusa isn't planning to step away from this mentality. Let's just wait and see what comes next, from both sides.
@@finlay9260 What hobby printer of reasonable price and innovation have prusa brought out lately
Finally someone gives us the right to a buy an industrial grade machine(i suppose it is) .Democratising the technology for people is a good thing.Only the price is a litle too much for me.I could sell my car 🙄 Grtz Belgium
As an engineer (3rd year student) one thing missing with these FDM printers is easy watertight/airtight parts and very occasionally resolution. It’s come up as an issue multiple times for me. Mostly the former. I think this could be solved without resorting to a resin printer by Prusa. One produce a highly accurate mini FDM printer within the existing machine. Something modular maybe. So like you change the nozzle on the Main machine but the xyz axis is different so it’s way more accurate, also maybe this would require a specialised filament they could charge a premium for that had very low thermal expansion. The second thing could be a separate post processing machine that basically intelligently melted the layers into a homogeneous surface automatically. I’ve tried this with a heat gun and and a blow torch and have ruined many parts, I usually end up option with coating the entire thing with epoxy resin and that’s annoying. I’m also aware you can make watertight and possibly airtight prints with certain setting but from what I’ve seen those techniques have draw backs and limitations and also require a lot of trial and error.
I don't mean to offend you, but did you try any prusa printer? Because with mine (which is a FDM btw), I never had any issue making watertight parts. The settings are not complicated, it's just a matter of walls / infill. If you meant however an assembly of multiple part being watertight, again, It's a matter of tolerance, and prusa printers are really good at it. However I agree, there are lots of trial and errors, but the good thing is, once the setting is done, their machine are so well tuned workhorses, you'll end up with good result everytime.
It's bit of a shame prusa is slowly leaving the consumer market. I'm glad for their success, but I'm sad we won't see any new affordable gems like the prusa mini in the future...
No drying chamber to keep the spool away from moisture will result to weak parts especially with ULTEM, PEEK and PEKK.
Hi. We are also offering a Drybox for this.
www.prusa3d.com/es/producto/prusa-pro-filament-drybox/
I mean, it's a great printer, but is it that much better than XL to be priced at 11'490 Euros?
I really miss times when prusa made innovative and affordable printers for hobbysts
that... was a surprise...
Why do people compare printers that will literally melt or burn their motors before continuing to print? This machine is designed to withstand heat, it is not a normal printer. The new Prusa is great for engineering materials, it is not for a pla bros.
how hot can the chamber get at max.?
@@wildniscamper7276
90 degrees inside the chamber and surely the motors of that industrial prusa can withstand more than 200 degrees, perhaps they are water cooled. What a normal domestic printer motor can withstand up to 100 degrees in operation in some cases of printers with good quality motors
In a delta the motors for movement do not have to be in the chamber, and the extruded motor has its own cooling system (see the air hose)
Very nice engineering
@@sasukedh i know, is was working for eos and voxeljet.. i don't know what to think of that printer. to me, fdm is not good for endproducts or usable parts at all.. sls or slm with pa2200 is the best process to me.. yeah could be watercooled but i guess they moved the motors out of the chamber.. not easy to handle 90°C in that chamber
@@wildniscamper7276 Yes, it is very possible that they have removed the motors from the camera and used gimbals, for example, to move them. It also depends on the material that can be handled, although it is true that SLS laser casting is more optimal since the laser melts much better. The problem with SLS is that the pollution residue must be more difficult to handle and probably more toxic. The material they need is not as extreme as it should be and that's why taking an FDM route is quite plausible from the way I see it, I also have a small laboratory and I make printers and we test materials by the way.
Prusa, I have been wondering how the MK4 loadcell works. You guys should upload a video on how it works!
Never been able to afford anything you sell.
I do wonder why they didn’t opt for an IDEX. While the XL is a great toolchanger it definitely isn’t on an industrial level or capable of stuff like Nylon, PSU, Peek, ultem etc. An IDEX would allow use for things like dissolving supports to really maximize what engineers can do. By sticking to a single material you’re both using more of the costly materials and also restricting your models to those with manually removable supports or single material
Wait, did I see a roll of Prusament PEEK from 4:12 to 5:04?
Prusament PEI 1010. ;) Not available quite yet www.prusa3d.com/product/prusament-pei-1010-natural-500-g/
@@Prusa3DI will never believe that people are printing with the material my build plate is made from
I will if i could
We need a detailed accurate comparaison to a Flsun V400 .
They are different printers for different uses, they just both happen to be delta printers. The V400 can only manage 300 C on the nozzle and 110 C on the bed with no chamber heater. This Prusa HT90 can manage 500 C on the nozzle, 155 C on the bed and 90 C actively heated chamber.
The V400 is meant for the consumer market with relatively low end materials, like PLA and PETG. The HT90 is meant for engineering materials, nylon, PC, PEI, PEEK, etc. materials that you couldn’t print on a V400.
The HT90 is also meant for companies or professional engineers, the V400 is meant for hobbyists, you can’t really compare them. If you are comparing them on how well they can print PLA or PETG you are missing the whole point of the HT90.
First thank to have took the time to respond secondly I get that the Prusa Pro HT90 and the V400 are different beasts, especially in terms of price ^^ and certainly in term of features and capabilities like the interchangeable heads and this 500°C nozzle temperature and the wider range of printable materials .
However, as an happy owner of the V400, I’m still interested in a comparison because
Despite their differences, there are notable similarities. The V400 can print at speeds up to 600 mm/s and has a build volume of 300 x 300 x 410 mm, which is quite comparable to the HT90.
Also, the HT90’s max acceleration of 20,000 mm/s² is impressive , V400’s performance is still quite similar to it ( in the speed and quality regard) for its price .
What interest me is to explore what Prusa has done with their slicer approach i'm sure their innovations could provide valuable insights on how to optimize the use of my V400.( with i hope better slicing approach to delta fdm printer )
There’s always something to learn from Prusa’s high-quality approach to 3D printing, and i hope their new printer could inspired the others fdm delta ecosystem.
That's like comparing a Bigrep machine to an Ender 6-7
The only thing they have in common is the kinematics
Why compare it to the old Flsun and not the Flsun S1 ?
10k are you taking the p Joe
I have a question: How do you see your printer in comparison to the 22IDEX which costs roughly 50% more but offers the additional feature of being an Idex and also supporting non planar printing to a degree.
It’s brilliant, but it costs $10000 + tax, takes 2 weeks to build and up to 8 weeks to arrive. It really is not meant for everyone.
Wow! I just can't wait until 2027 when it gets released!!!!
Why 2027?
Shipping to customers now, that's what this video is about. :)
@@TheMikolasZuza wait and see.
@@Romancelanguagespassion Cause Prusa takes forever to release or ship like the XL.
it says in the website it'll take 2 weeks to process since ordering
it's not a pre-release announcement. The man literally showed it in deployment in 3 different places
They are "Ultimaking" themselves back into the high profit, but very low volume industrial corner with the MK4, the XL, and now this...
I don't own a Bambu Lab printer, but i do have several Vorons, a Rat Rig VCore 3 and even a MK3S+.
I also own a 2016-era self-sourced Delta Kossel.
The MK4 is just way too expensive for what it offers, there are no excuses anymore.
I guessed usd 5000 but its usd 9990. Interesting but not for me. Laurie. NZ.
I’m so glad I held off on a Bambu purchase. The price isn’t the problem.
Hope you all come out with a smaller version, that lacks the 90c build chamber. Would gladly buy ome for $2-$3k, but $10k is a but rich fir my wallet
It's for professionals, not for hobbyist
@Romancelanguagespassion and that's why i was saying i would like a smaller and cheaper version that lacks the higher temps. I know its for professionals, but would be nice to see a prosumer version of it.
@@dacryon3755 maybe in the next year for small one. Let's see 😜
@@dacryon3755 yeah then people will bitch and moan about how the other Chinese company can do it for much less and faster. There's no end to the negativity.
@brisance true, have a friend who says prusa should be ashamed of their prices and their printed parts. Meanwhile he is excited for voron printers with their prices/printed parts. Also loves creality due to their prices
Nice another delta
And what’s the price on way you’ve got to get a quote honestly it’s a 3-D printer you know what the prices just put the price on your website
$10,000 ??
That's.... no.
you don't give 10,000, so you're not a "professional" 🙂
😍😍😍
Im sorry but Why do you have to select the voltage when ordering. This is an absolute no go for such a machine. It has to work reliably and decrease opportunities for user error.
You really want to complain about something, don't you?
@@fofopads4450 not really, I’m actually more a fan of Prusa then not, but this just seems very strange for a 10k€ machine
That synthesized voiceover 😵
Pro tip for a Pro video: Proofread the CC because I’m pretty sure this person at 1:10 didn’t intend to say “flowers overhangs”. My 2 Yens.
- ArnaudThe100YenEngineer
This is fine but Prusa has a very hard time keeping things in stock. Their Ultem filament is out of stock already. And CF PETG and PC is hardly ever available so it is not dependable. Also, they leave so many things they promised on the back burner to be completely forgotten. One example is their smart box for the enclosure which was announced years ago and is nowhere in sight.
I guess if you're willing to pay $200 for 1KG of PEK or $400 for a roll of ULTEM, then your also willing to pay $10K for a printer.
I'm curious, how many folks routinely print with those filaments?
And, it's not as if there aren't a number of different engineering filaments that can be printed on affordable core XY printers.
If this printer performs as advertised, it is clearly targeted at a very small group of users who need PEK and ULTEM prints.
I doubt it does much for the bottom line for prusa.
You have it backwards. Very few organizations/people are printing these expensive materials, because the cost of getting into them easily exceeds $50+K. What Prusa is offering, is the ability to do so at 1/5th the cost. That is the value proposition. When there is demand, supply witll match it. Josef Prusa majored in Economics btw.
@@brisancedo you print with either of those materials? If not, then do you plan on buying this machine so you can affordably print with them?
I do several structural engineering parts with ABS-GF and they print great and are very strong. Not as good with chemical resistance as the others though.
@@ChippWalters yes I will be buying a machine to test. Everyone wants a do-it-all printer that is cheap and good. But we'll never get there if no one supports the current product on the market. Advancements always come step-wise. The original 911 Porsche is an objectively terrible car, when viewed with a modern lens. But the current model wouldn't exist if no one bought the previous ones.
@@brisance lmao, no. The funmat HT does everything the HT90 will do, for half the price
@@caidenriggers5972 Stop lying. Funmat Pro HT410 isn't 10K, it's more like 25K so it's 2.5x more expensive.
i spoke to a secret insider at prusa and found out that the HT stands for Hawk Tuah 90 ;)
🤣
I'm interested to see the difference between this and the underperforming mk4. This look like I would get the quality for what is being paid.
So a 1000 cartesian machine is not as fast as a 10000 delta machine! You tell em buddy!
@@fofopads4450Do you measure performance only based on speed ? I use this for engineering. I usually need a good tuned temperature (PID) and a solid structure. Speed is not a huge consideration as long as I can print Abs to 150-200 mm/s. I rarely need a something faster. In the case of the Mk4, it just doesn't give me value that justifies its price point in my opinion. No nozzle brush but it probes with the nozzle load (unreliable first layer), no PID routine, the enclosure comes with no abs or heat resistant parts replacement for the printer, it comes with no camera, no led light, the wifi printing interface is not polished or was closed to finish when I bought my machines. The thermistor had faulty reading on 4 units (it was solved thanks to their amazing customer service). The hotend has a very limited heating capacity, so for material that requires a good amount of heat (280C). I have to slowdown quite significantly because of that. The idler gets sloppy rapidly. I had to reprint it already for all 4 units.
Don't get me wrong, they work. It's just that I have to do engineering, not tinkering... If I had to repurchase units for prototyping like I am doing, I would buy something else.
is this basically a FLsun S1 ?
No not really, the FLsun S1's temp rating are too low for printing with extra high temp materials like PEI and PEEK, which is basically what categorizes this printer as a true industrial printer.
@@thespartan3479 AH okay cool
This is sorely missing the option to print soluble supports imo, being constrained by the same limitations as a budget FDM printer is disappointing.
Very exciting design, always loved the Delta printers with their more exotic kinematics. However, isn't 90 degree chamber temp a bit cold for PEEK? From what I've heard, especially in an industrial context, 140 degree+ would be more appropriate for such a demanding material.
3DXTech recommends a 70 - 140 C chamber for their PEEK and filamentive recommends > 80 C, so whilst on the low end it should be enough, especially for small and medium sized parts.
Higher temperatures are better though.
@@conorstewart2214 Indeed, for small parts it will most likely be fine, but medium to large (I am thinking parts with much longer print times and weirder geometries) will become an issue (but that's just how 3dprinting is in general, eh?). Also you won't get optimal layer adhesion, which is a bigger problem because if you're using PEEK in the first place it's for its outstanding properties as a superpolymer. Just to be clear, I haven't personally printed PEEK (yet), I don't have a machine capable of that. Fartest I've gone is Carbon-nylon (which is still very fun). However, I do know people who print PEEK on a regular basis, so what I say mostly comes from what they said + my own research on the topic. And I still think this printer is a pretty impressive machine that has a big potential.
Joe will run Burt's Bee when he gets older
All the bambu bots in here complaining about price. This isn't a regular hobby printer that's designed to print only cheap hobby material like PLA, ASA, ABS, etc. It's an industrial printer designed to print industrial materials that 99% of hobby printer's cant do. Industrial materials like PEKK, PEEK, ULTEM require an industrial printer with very high temps. Printers that print these materials often cost more than $40k, sometimes even over $100k. Prusa out here doing it for just a fraction of that.
Even a $2500 bambu X1E only has a 60c heated chamber. and 300c hotend. This has 90c chamber and 500c hotend.
The people complaining about the price here simply haven't heard the shot and are a bit stupid in the head.
Actually, it is pretty expensive for what it is. It would be a steal if it was 5 years ago, but you can get more for less. I thought the price was good until i saw that there was no dual lifting nozzle system. Even the very first commercially available fdm 3d had that in the 90s. Also 90c is like the minimum for peek and I wouldn't even entertain printing ultem that low. 90C will give you perfect prints WITH ABS and PC, but nothing more. The Funmat pro 310 stomps all over this thing. Better specs and cheaper. I guess this is faster? But that speed means nothing if you have spend forever removing supports.
The only "bot" is LilApe trolling EVERY bambu lab video. Get over it. COPE.
@@AnnikaFPV lmao the Funmat pro 310 can only reach 300c on the hotend and can't even print the advanced material that the HT90 can. What are you even on about? The best it can print is nylon which virtually any 3d printer could do that. The HT90 can print PEK/PEEK/ULTEM.
@@Denniss7420 Trolling? you misspelled "stating facts"
Bit expensive compared to the XL although not that much. I just bought the XL at work. For now this will do.
Just a warning to anyone out there that got excited about the idea of printing Peek. I have a fair amount of experience with high performance materials like peek and ultem for engineering applications, and I can tell you that a 90C chamber is just not hot enough. Even with a bed that gets that hot you're going to have a hard time making anything bigger than a benchy that has good layer adhesion and meet any real tolerance requirements. I agree those stats are perfect for ABS polycarbonate and HTN Nylon, and I'm probably going to get this printer but definitely not for peek or utlem.
I mean, they definitely print a bunch of bigger prints, but sure okay 👍
@deathspawn54 Not trying to discredit the machine or prusa. Like I said, I want this machine. Just some helpful advice to anyone wanting to print large accurate parts out of peek or utlem will have serious challenges with those temperature stats. Again I know, I've done this industry. Just trying to be helpful to someone that is out there trying to find a HT machine.
@@brocklydoodle I saw another video of it where they show some medium large prints that seemed to look really good, but nothing super large, I guess the print area isn't that big either though
@@deathspawn54 I'm speaking specifically about ultem and peek prints
@@brocklydoodle I should have clarified that they were peek and ultem