Justice Alito’s Flag Controversy Brings Scrutiny to Supreme Court Ethics | Amanpour and Company

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 тра 2024
  • In the U.S., controversy over the Supreme Court continues. According to The New York Times, a second provocative flag was flown at a home belonging to Justice Samuel Alito. This comes after an upside-down American flag, a symbol of Trump’s election deniers, was seen flying outside Alito’s house shortly after the January 6th insurrection. Several justices have now had their impartiality called into question with little consequence. Aaron Tang, author of "Supreme Hubris," believes the Court is overplaying its hand. The author joins the show to discuss how to restore public trust to this vital institution.
    Originally aired on May 23, 2024
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Major support for Amanpour and Company is provided by The Anderson Family Endowment, Jim Attwood and Leslie Williams, Candace King Weir, the Leila and Mickey Straus Family Charitable Trust, Mark J. Blechner, the Filomen M. D'Agostino Foundation, Seton J. Melvin, Charles Rosenblum, Koo and Patricia Yuen, Barbara Hope Zuckerberg, Jeffrey Katz and Beth Rogers, Bernard and Denise Schwartz, the JPB Foundation, the Sylvia A. and Simon B. Poyta Programming Endowment to Fight Antisemitism and Josh Weston.
    Subscribe to the Amanpour and Company. channel here: bit.ly/2EMIkTJ
    Subscribe to our daily newsletter to find out who's on each night: www.pbs.org/wnet/amanpour-and-...
    For more from Amanpour and Company, including full episodes, click here: to.pbs.org/2NBFpjf
    Like Amanpour and Company on Facebook: bit.ly/2HNx3EF
    Follow Amanpour and Company on Twitter: bit.ly/2HLpjTI
    Watch Amanpour and Company weekdays on PBS (check local listings).
    Amanpour and Company features wide-ranging, in-depth conversations with global thought leaders and cultural influencers on the issues and trends impacting the world each day, from politics, business and technology to arts, science and sports. Christiane Amanpour leads the conversation on global and domestic news from London with contributions by prominent journalists Walter Isaacson, Michel Martin, Alicia Menendez and Hari Sreenivasan from the Tisch WNET Studios at Lincoln Center in New York City.
    #amanpourpbs

КОМЕНТАРІ • 508

  • @davidhirschy8761
    @davidhirschy8761 27 днів тому +219

    It’s beyond time Alito and Thomas need to be impeached!

    • @nightlightabcd
      @nightlightabcd 27 днів тому

      Can't! They would take it to the SCOTUS and that would be the end of that!! Trump ,will want to take his convictions to the SCOTUS as well! The SCOTUS is NOT working for America but for Trump and his Republicans!

    • @msolomonii9825
      @msolomonii9825 27 днів тому +12

      long past over-due.

    • @magouliana32
      @magouliana32 27 днів тому +1

      Impeached for their opinion ?

    • @marciaweisel1176
      @marciaweisel1176 27 днів тому +4

      Don't stop there!

    • @patticriss2238
      @patticriss2238 27 днів тому +7

      Frankly, that should include Roberts on the first line. The court bears his name. Does he have control or not. He could deal with them. He chooses and is CHOOSING EVERY DAY THIS CONTINUES.
      Turn yourself in, turn states evidence against the worst of them and let’s move on

  • @catgir5x
    @catgir5x 27 днів тому +179

    NO ONE NEEDS TO WONDER.. Conservative Scotus Judges are working for someone other than the peoples of US...

  • @elizabethwilkerson5434
    @elizabethwilkerson5434 27 днів тому +133

    Time to impeach Alito and Thomas!

    • @markg.7865
      @markg.7865 27 днів тому

      If the GOP won't impeach dumb Donald, they will never impeach Alito or Thomas.

  • @michaelmackey754
    @michaelmackey754 27 днів тому +83

    It makes me sick to be an American, and know that a justice of the supreme court can get Trump fever

    • @PrettyWhiteLady
      @PrettyWhiteLady 27 днів тому +8

      I very closely watch what takes place down in the states living in Canada, because before too long, what is happening politically in the States tends to happen in the UK and Canada. Here in Canada, since we've had Trudeau for so long, we are unfortunately ripe for people to think, oh let's try conservatives for a while. Well, thanks to Trump's madness, conservative isn't just a political party anymore. It's a dangerous cult.

    • @judykinsman3258
      @judykinsman3258 25 днів тому

      They are controlled by the Federalist Society’s deep, deep pockets. No shame, no morals.

  • @panl22
    @panl22 27 днів тому +52

    Before this flag situation, we already knew that Alito was corrupt. After Democrats take both houses, we MUST investigate Alito's crimes. Then impeach and imprison.

  • @reallysomebody
    @reallysomebody 27 днів тому +118

    This like a bad nightmare I wish I could wake up from

    • @blueberry-ri7eb
      @blueberry-ri7eb 27 днів тому

      It is all in the push to make the country a Theocracy and destroy secularism

    • @svensven8994
      @svensven8994 27 днів тому +1

      if this is your nightmare you live a very comfortable spoon-fed life. Omg

    • @14LP2
      @14LP2 27 днів тому +6

      VOTE

    • @reallysomebody
      @reallysomebody 26 днів тому +5

      @@svensven8994 the supreme court just ruled that racial gerrymandering isn't really racial gerrymandering. For minorities this is an absolute nightmare. And for women, an absolute nightmare.

  • @rclausen
    @rclausen 26 днів тому +10

    Alito and Thomas have completely destroyed the integrity of the Supreme Court

  • @user-vn4og7zl8p
    @user-vn4og7zl8p 27 днів тому +30

    America needs a peaceful protest at the supreme court. VOTE BLUE EVERYONE.❤❤❤❤❤

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 24 дні тому

      THIS is how you show you vote *#BLUE**!* 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙

  • @thewebdiva5903
    @thewebdiva5903 27 днів тому +137

    Who thought it was a good idea to allow Supreme Court judges to accept gifts? No other judges are allowed to do this for good reason. This was not the traditional way.

    • @ryanreedgibson
      @ryanreedgibson 27 днів тому

      No one thought it was a good idea. They got caught and are trying to gaslight us.

    • @rosanna5515
      @rosanna5515 27 днів тому +6

      A question from a non-American: Are judges not meant to be non-political?
      If so, what consequences would failure to observe this requirement carry? Thank you.

    • @EmilyBltz
      @EmilyBltz 27 днів тому

      @@rosanna5515they are supposed to be nonpartisan however these justices seem to be thumbing their noses at accountability. If you have the chance google ´Project 2025´. This is the playbook the far right wants to roll out should Trump be elected and unfortunately there are people in power that will do or say almost anything for that to happen.

    • @stephen-wahl
      @stephen-wahl 27 днів тому +9

      ​@@rosanna5515Absolutely but only in the rest of Western liberal democracies. As a Canadian and neighbor our judges are not allowed to have any political affiliation or activism at all. And thank God our supreme Court justices have to retire at 75. In the US it seems, all bets are off. Look how political the appointments are FFS. It's a joke.

    • @tjipjoustra4359
      @tjipjoustra4359 27 днів тому +6

      There's no substantial check on them not reporting the gifts.

  • @kenelliott8944
    @kenelliott8944 26 днів тому +11

    IMPEACH BOTH THOMAS & ALITO!! Americans are paying them to APPEAR IMPARTIAL. THOMAS & ALITO are not meeting the expectations of the job!!!

  • @ronniew3028
    @ronniew3028 27 днів тому +107

    It always comes down to 'follow the money'!

    • @JR-pr8jb
      @JR-pr8jb 27 днів тому +8

      Follow the MAGA.

    • @nightlightabcd
      @nightlightabcd 27 днів тому +2

      And the power!

    • @sylviewalker7560
      @sylviewalker7560 27 днів тому

      Church and State have been connected by Just Us Alito and Just Us Clarence Thomas...et al. Corruption at it's finest.

    • @CC-vw1cs
      @CC-vw1cs 25 днів тому +3

      Sadly true.

  • @glenncurry3041
    @glenncurry3041 27 днів тому +53

    Lady Justice blind scales? Trump walking around free.... question answered!

  • @thjbird
    @thjbird 27 днів тому +116

    No branch of government is above the Constitution, the rule of law, oversight, and scrutiny. It’s absurd that they claim it. They need to face accountability in a major way. They claim to have the power to rule the country as a monarchy.

    • @nightlightabcd
      @nightlightabcd 27 днів тому

      The Constitution is so vague that it can be twisted and spun for anything the Republicans want, and they do! Like the 2ed amendment for example!

    • @phylis3917
      @phylis3917 27 днів тому +2

      Here here !!!

    • @jacquirimown3886
      @jacquirimown3886 27 днів тому +2

      Your country has at least nine kings above the law deciding if a past presidency is also a king above the law.

    • @NancyLauten
      @NancyLauten 27 днів тому

      Delusional! Repugnant Party! JUST SAY NO!

    • @judykinsman3258
      @judykinsman3258 25 днів тому

      Oh wow! What country do you live in?🤔🤣

  • @stephensuddick1896
    @stephensuddick1896 27 днів тому +41

    Alito always struck me as being the worst type of person to be awarded a Supreme Court Justice position.

  • @TRE45ON.is.Bat5hit.Crazy.U.S.G
    @TRE45ON.is.Bat5hit.Crazy.U.S.G 27 днів тому +62

    "The conservative position isn't that they want the states to have the right to give you more freedom, they want the states to have the right to take it away."

  • @andreabarker419
    @andreabarker419 27 днів тому +28

    Looking in from Australia I can’t believe this is not being addressed by the Chief Justice

    • @paulj8539
      @paulj8539 27 днів тому

      Also in Australia, chief Justice has no power to compel the other justices to do anything.

    • @speakeasy911
      @speakeasy911 26 днів тому

      The Chief Justice has no power.

  • @briannao9251
    @briannao9251 27 днів тому +45

    Who Alito gonna blame this time? The family poodle?

    • @MightyfireflyAndme
      @MightyfireflyAndme 27 днів тому +1

      For the flag in his vacation 2nd house? Why… his 2nd wife of course.

    • @mk1st
      @mk1st 27 днів тому +2

      The pool boy

    • @deerobins9086
      @deerobins9086 25 днів тому

      The wind! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @rileylabski
    @rileylabski 27 днів тому +57

    In order to scrutinize the ethics of the SCOTUS, they would have to possess some in the first place.

  • @robertsanderford2643
    @robertsanderford2643 27 днів тому +15

    So what it all boils down to, is the Supreme Court thinks that it is above the law.

    • @beefandbarley
      @beefandbarley 27 днів тому +2

      Which clearly makes them unqualified for their positions and duties.

  • @keepinganopenmind8216
    @keepinganopenmind8216 27 днів тому +48

    If they were CEOs of public traded corporations they would be required to step down immediately ..no bonuses no pensions no health care ....benefits just walk away ...now

    • @joeblow5087
      @joeblow5087 27 днів тому +5

      CEOs get away with lots of law breaking and are rarely held accountable.

    • @phylis3917
      @phylis3917 27 днів тому +1

      🎯

    • @therealrobertbirchall
      @therealrobertbirchall 26 днів тому

      Not in the UK CEOs are in bed with the political class and suffer no consequences for their malfeasance. Look at the British Post office scandal for example, no one will go to jail for the hundreds of lives ruined and even those who took their own lives because of the behaviour of the post office board and CEO.

  • @l.t.m.a.6968
    @l.t.m.a.6968 27 днів тому +13

    Why aren’t these justices thrown out of the Supreme Court for flagrant snubbing of the code of ethics and basic decency?

    • @joneslo5572
      @joneslo5572 24 дні тому

      Why?? Because the people are too lazy to protest and not conscious enough to upheld the constitution and thee law of the land. VOTE FOR AMERICA, VOTE BLUE.

  • @davidk1493
    @davidk1493 27 днів тому +18

    We have a Supreme Court with 3-second-rate religious and political extremists appointed by a president who didn’t win the popular vote and received a little more than 25% of the eligible vote.
    One Supreme Court judge bases his abortion decision on arguments of a 17th-century jurist (Mathew Hale) who conceived the notion that husbands can’t be prosecuted for raping their wives, who sentenced women to death as “witches,” and whose misogyny stood out even in his time.
    Another declares that the job of a lawyer is to "to know, love, and serve God."
    Three of these Justices shamelessly lied before a Senate committee about their commitment to legal precedent concerning Roe V Wade.
    Finally, these justices show contempt for the deeply held democracy-sustaining beliefs of our founders (who they refer to only when it suits their extremist gun-obsessed, pollution-spreading, women-demeaning worldview).

    • @arieschick1
      @arieschick1 24 дні тому +2

      Well done !

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 24 дні тому

      Thank you for posting. You Get It.

  • @stevestunning3326
    @stevestunning3326 27 днів тому +17

    If the “excuse” Alito gave were true, and I don’t believe him for a minute, it would demonstrate that he doesn’t have the maturity that a Supreme court justice should have. The flag at his vacation home also proves he’s lying.

  • @dax2725
    @dax2725 27 днів тому +48

    What Ethics ???

    • @paulj8539
      @paulj8539 27 днів тому

      "What? Ethics? Nah, we're good here" - John Roberts

  • @matthightower1570
    @matthightower1570 27 днів тому +20

    Everyone keeps referring to "Supreme Court ethics" as if they had any ethics at all.

  • @robalexwar
    @robalexwar 27 днів тому +15

    Corruption - plain and simple

  • @JP-JustSayin
    @JP-JustSayin 27 днів тому +28

    33 supreme court justices sounds just about right... give 'em 12 year terms, confirm 3 new ones every presidential term, and have them hear cases in random panels of 7, same ethics as the appeals court.
    If you vote to grant cert, you can't hear that case. The case load can be larger, and it will remove this "duty to sit" nonsense that's being used as a fig leaf against what should be obvious recusals.

  • @lmrony
    @lmrony 27 днів тому +27

    To be fair - the Supreme court Judges must comprise of equal number of both Republican &: Democratic appointed Judges.Every Judge should only have a max of 12 years unless re- appointed. Every Judge can be removed if proven to have ethics problems.

    • @speakeasy911
      @speakeasy911 26 днів тому +1

      You lost me at unless reappointed.

  • @dad102
    @dad102 27 днів тому +12

    Justice in America is a joke. A bad joke.
    And Samuel Alito is the punchline.
    Because justice in America is for sale to the highest bidder.
    Why doesnt somebody ask George Bush what he thinks about Alito's actions,
    and if he has any regrets about nominating him to the court?

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 24 дні тому

      THAT sucker has been AWFUL QUIET all during this whole mess!!! And before he left he said: "I will be vindicated!" So, wtf was he talking about!??? THIS crap?? Bush was the 1st NEOCON to be president, and THAT was the beginning of ALL of our recent troubles here. There are plenty of dots to connect. Another Screwball who's mother said that "He was the 'chosen one'. Now wtf is THAT supposed to mean????????? 😡😡🤬

  • @thestraightroad305
    @thestraightroad305 27 днів тому +19

    Humility is necessary for true wisdom. May it be so in the Supreme Court. The dishonor Alito and Thomas have done has jeopardized their careers.

  • @EmilyBltz
    @EmilyBltz 27 днів тому +11

    Then our system has a weak link. No one is perfect and everyone needs accountability. Vote blue so this can change.

  • @paulj8539
    @paulj8539 27 днів тому +11

    No one should be judge in their own trial... unless you're a member of the supreme court, in which case you're fine, let your freak flag fly.
    Imagine, if you will, that the flag was a BLM flag at Justice Jackson's house...

    • @user-yt3so4pk7u
      @user-yt3so4pk7u 25 днів тому

      Republicans was the would lose their minds VOTE BIDEN HARRIS NO 3RD PARTY

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 24 дні тому

      OH! If that ever happened no one would hear the END of it!!!!

  • @garybowler5946
    @garybowler5946 27 днів тому +14

    I don't believe Thomas, Alito or Gorsuch (TAG) will be swayed by congress, common sense or fairness.

  • @williamturnier9032
    @williamturnier9032 27 днів тому +21

    Scrutiny of Supreme Court Ethics? 😂 They have none.

  • @rosieE121
    @rosieE121 27 днів тому +14

    How can those seditious justices be fired?

  • @beyondmarked5235
    @beyondmarked5235 27 днів тому +53

    Can't these 'justices" be sued? A liberay group should start to sue Alito and Thomas

    • @trevinbeattie4888
      @trevinbeattie4888 26 днів тому +1

      No, because hypothetically they could just appeal such a suit to the Supreme Court, which would put them in judgement of themselves. That’s why it’s up to Congress to judge Supreme Court justices.

    • @beyondmarked5235
      @beyondmarked5235 26 днів тому +1

      @@trevinbeattie4888 I hope Biden expands the court to 12

  • @thehoaofcoronadoplace2801
    @thehoaofcoronadoplace2801 27 днів тому +14

    I believe Roberts has also accepted questionable gifts.

  • @leohorishny9561
    @leohorishny9561 27 днів тому +11

    If high court judges can’t “get-by” on 300K/year, then DON’T accept the position! NO ONE forced them to a lifetime job with only a measly six figure remuneration for the chore.
    🤷🏼‍♂️
    P.S. 13 Districts = 13 judges, AND before November. Period.

    • @donnashankie4526
      @donnashankie4526 27 днів тому +3

      I'd LOVE to be making $300k a year. I worked my tush off for less than a third of that and maintained my integrity.

  • @kristinaoboyle3544
    @kristinaoboyle3544 27 днів тому +5

    The company I work for, no one was to take gifts. Your were fired if they caught you. Why should our Supreme Court be above this ?

  • @roach9300
    @roach9300 27 днів тому +7

    No one can tell me why it’s been 2 years since we’ve heard of these flags ?

  • @Merzui-kg8ds
    @Merzui-kg8ds 27 днів тому +8

    It's not a controversy. It is treason.

  • @victoriawhitworth9400
    @victoriawhitworth9400 27 днів тому +6

    Terrific interview and outstanding analysis by Aaron Tang. Thank you!

  • @hermanator2
    @hermanator2 27 днів тому +18

    I’d not heard of Aaron Tang before but his commentary and delivery of difficult and complex matters is perfect. Thank you for this informative and illuminating interview.

  • @MarkEisenman
    @MarkEisenman 27 днів тому +21

    Bagels vs, Scotus
    Compare and contrast:
    At a time when Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was accepting lavish trips paid for by GOP megadonor Harlan Crow, fellow Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan was turning down bagels and lox from high school friends, over concerns she could be violating the court's ethics rules for accepting gifts, according to a new report.
    Forward reported that friends who attended Hunter College High School in Manhattan with Kagan in the 1970s wanted to send her a "care package" of bagels, lox, babka, chocolates, and other inexpensive items in February 2021.
    However, they later scrapped the idea after Kagan expressed concerns about issues it could pose under the Supreme Court's rules on gifts and disclosures, per Forward.
    "We thought it would be a sign of support to send her some lox, but she was too ethical to take the lox," said Sarah Schulman, a former school friend, according to the media outlet.
    And now we Thomas and Alito, who have NO integrity.

    • @phylis3917
      @phylis3917 27 днів тому +5

      No integrity. No humility ego and self-interest.

    • @arxsyn
      @arxsyn 27 днів тому +3

      I would be ok with her accepting the food. The equivalent of buying lunch for her and her clerks.
      However This behavior in comparison is like night and day. They are truly shameless

  • @johnkelley1426
    @johnkelley1426 27 днів тому +7

    Why the f did the NYTImes wait 3+ years to report this story? Is the NYT in the tank for trump, for Alito, for Thomas?

  • @missrose0077
    @missrose0077 27 днів тому +12

    Let's not forget it was recently reported that FEDERAL JUDGE ALIEN CANON was remiss in reporting that fairly recently she took 2 trips to a luxury lodge in Montana via the Federalist Society. Perhaps she was hiking or learning how to fly fish or she was getting pointers to make sure the MAL case never gets to trial before the election

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 24 дні тому

      *BINGO!!* It *STINKS!!* Like Rotten fish!!!

  • @NopeUghUghAbsolutelyNot
    @NopeUghUghAbsolutelyNot 27 днів тому +8

    As soon as scotus made the recusal law a self-governing process, they placed themselves above the law. No one shall be their own judge and jury

    • @GS-uy4xo
      @GS-uy4xo 27 днів тому +1

      Strange that they, themselves, would have made their own law - who could have seen this coming?😂

    • @NopeUghUghAbsolutelyNot
      @NopeUghUghAbsolutelyNot 27 днів тому

      @@GS-uy4xo Hello😆

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 24 дні тому

      @@GS-uy4xo What's so damned funny troll?

  • @jmcd9828
    @jmcd9828 27 днів тому +10

    These are top 9 judges in all the U.S.? This sort of lapse in ‘judgement’ from one of them, and this is not the only slip up, makes the country look like a joke!

    • @beefandbarley
      @beefandbarley 27 днів тому +1

      It’s not a country. It’s a people farm.

    • @PennyDavis-cm9tl
      @PennyDavis-cm9tl 27 днів тому +1

      It's also honor to Corporate. I pledge allegiance to the Corporation of the United States of America.😮

  • @MB-nn3jw
    @MB-nn3jw 27 днів тому +5

    A thoughtful and well-articulated presentation.

  • @colleenbishop7387
    @colleenbishop7387 27 днів тому +5

    Why are the other Justices not doing anything about this issue, does this not tear down any future historical failure of the group as a whole?

  • @user-wy7nu7kc3j
    @user-wy7nu7kc3j 27 днів тому +6

    Even the Justices who have not been tainted by the scandals of Alito Thomas et al, must go. Their silence speaks volumes. The entire court has to be disbanded and replaced.

    • @speakeasy911
      @speakeasy911 26 днів тому +2

      Read the Alito written opinion on the South Carolina voting maps. He needs to be impeached.

  • @cmarkd1
    @cmarkd1 27 днів тому +5

    One would think, given the gravity of the role of Supreme Court Justice, INTEGRITY should be the first (and perhaps only) qualification. It's very sad that the position is adulterated.

  • @glenncurry3041
    @glenncurry3041 27 днів тому +10

    The number of SCOTUS can be adjusted at will. It could as well be reduced in size based on tenure, Get rid of the Opus Dei fanatic, drunk guy and pubic hair people. Then increased it back in size.

  • @birdiefortruth3196
    @birdiefortruth3196 27 днів тому +5

    Truly disturbing to see. Obviously, they hold too much power, and need to be reined in with a firm set of ethics. It appears they think they’re above the law.

  • @janmarkus4729
    @janmarkus4729 27 днів тому +5

    They had judge Jackson recuse herself why can't they for the others

  • @davidolson8537
    @davidolson8537 27 днів тому +5

    Alito needs to go.

  • @user-gi2sv2pf4y
    @user-gi2sv2pf4y 27 днів тому +4

    Thank you

  • @keepinganopenmind8216
    @keepinganopenmind8216 27 днів тому +5

    Name one case they didn't favor who was connected to their friends

  • @JIMMYPANTELLERIA
    @JIMMYPANTELLERIA 27 днів тому +3

    Congress or President needs to simply write a letter to the Chief Justice asking for the resignation of Judges Thomas and Alito. That's all. Then let them twist in the wind.

  • @HandyMan657
    @HandyMan657 27 днів тому +5

    Ya think they care ? They have proven they are above the law. This will change nothing.

  • @carolbulmer8253
    @carolbulmer8253 27 днів тому +2

    Excellent discussion! Thank you👏👏👏👏👏

  • @MikelNaUsaCom
    @MikelNaUsaCom 27 днів тому +8

    you would hope the justices would approach this with a good faith effort... but it seems they only want the appearance of good faith... and are not acting in good faith.

  • @michaelboguski4743
    @michaelboguski4743 27 днів тому +18

    We must begin referring to our High Court Justices in America as our Supreme Leaders.

    • @bernswonger57
      @bernswonger57 27 днів тому +2

      Correct you are, Justice is not the objective.

    • @nancygibson604
      @nancygibson604 27 днів тому +2

      There suppose to be,obviously not😂😂😂😂😂

    • @sylviewalker7560
      @sylviewalker7560 27 днів тому +1

      High Court Just Us 2024

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 24 дні тому

      Bullshit to THAT!! I call them what they ARE! *Traitors!!*

  • @extraincomesuz
    @extraincomesuz 26 днів тому +2

    As always, great reporting and questions. I kept asking, "How can congress reign in the SC?". Here you answered that question. Vote 💙 in Nov.

  • @Lennybird91
    @Lennybird91 27 днів тому +2

    This is some of the best journalism there is. Keep it up!

  • @fmyou62
    @fmyou62 27 днів тому +4

    I love this guy's solutions -- just get Alito and Thomas to reign it in. Yeah, that's the ticket! And while you're at it, we can urge Trump to behave more ethically!

  • @leohorishny9561
    @leohorishny9561 27 днів тому +4

    Not nearly enough. He’ll skate through this, because, “…it’s all his wife’s fault”.
    Typical Party of Personal Responsibility, intrinsically incapable of displaying an iota of same.🤨

  • @johnpeter6759
    @johnpeter6759 27 днів тому +4

    Surreal witnessing the end of the USA in real time

  • @user-ji4yo9nn4c
    @user-ji4yo9nn4c 27 днів тому +2

    Well, now it is more than a neighbourly dispute. Now it's nationwide!

  • @user-pp6fx7si4g
    @user-pp6fx7si4g 27 днів тому +3

    Isn't it high time, that those guys were scrutinized?

  • @patticriss2238
    @patticriss2238 27 днів тому +2

    Every single time you think you can no longer be shocked. You think, this is so low, how could it get worse? Alito, hold my beer, boy!

  • @dorothypettijohn1037
    @dorothypettijohn1037 27 днів тому +1

    Excellent interview thank you!

  • @johndelamontaigne7711
    @johndelamontaigne7711 27 днів тому +6

    This isnt about ethics. Its really about judge Alito being unfit to serve on the Supreme court. An insurrection supporter is NOT a supporter of the constitution or the rule of law. He has no business serving as any type of judge let alone serving in the highest court in the land!

  • @alcoolbc
    @alcoolbc 27 днів тому +3

    C'mon, look the other way. It's just a flag. Who cares? Wink wink....there's no way back now.

  • @victoriadavis8326
    @victoriadavis8326 25 днів тому +4

    The resent overturned Colorado's right to disavow the leader of the insurrection to remain on a ballot for office against our 14th amendment. Appeals of any recent rulings and request for recusals by justices with this information that have the appearance of bias, these appeals are justified and need done to establish a right to re-litigate, and it needs done expeditiously. If denied for redress then, then petition DOJ to investigate. In my opinion

  • @sanbeesanbee
    @sanbeesanbee 27 днів тому +2

    SCOTUS: lifetime appointment, more-than-comfortable salary, prestige, all with ZERO accountability - nice work if you can get it!

  • @lc4011
    @lc4011 27 днів тому +3

    The highest court in the land has the lowest ethics.

  • @douglassczygelski8667
    @douglassczygelski8667 27 днів тому +5

    Why doesn't Tang mention the fact that congress could pass a law making it illegal for federal judges to receive expensive gifts from anyone who isn't a relative?

    • @trevinbeattie4888
      @trevinbeattie4888 26 днів тому

      He did say there is a code of ethics which applies to all federal judges, which includes restrictions on accepting gifts; it’s covered by U.S.C. Title 5, Part III, Subpart, F Chapter 73, §7353. The problem as Tang stated is that the Supreme Court has no enforcement mechanism to comply with this law other than congressional impeachment and removal.

  • @user-wb3es8hz1d
    @user-wb3es8hz1d 27 днів тому +3

    The flags and gifts/bribes are remarkable, brazen, intentional and unethical. The blatant and flagrant disregard for the rule of law is a cry for help. They are testing their powers and have delved into criminal territory with open eyes.

  • @waynerobinson7057
    @waynerobinson7057 25 днів тому +2

    The SC feel they are above the law and above reproach.

  • @connieperry1575
    @connieperry1575 27 днів тому +1

    WTF???? This is so out of hand!!!! Let's do something immediately!

  • @wendellcoleman1137
    @wendellcoleman1137 27 днів тому +2

    Oh no, not scrutiny! What's next? Double Secret Probation?

  • @HarvinGwin-kr1ry
    @HarvinGwin-kr1ry 27 днів тому +3

    The US DOJ is a faded forgotten, singer playing shabby roadhouses for drinks. And each judge that Trump has appeared before, including the 9 immortals, is dead bang guilty of obscene public derogation of duty and flat out ignoring the law.
    Sad is a country waiting for a hero .

  • @naoise555
    @naoise555 25 днів тому +3

    Sam Alito could put a "Trump 2024" campaign sign on his front lawn and still rule on cases directly involving Donald Trump, and there is nothing anyone can do about it. It is sickening.

  • @user-vn4og7zl8p
    @user-vn4og7zl8p 27 днів тому +2

    And thats our supreme court. Yipee.😢😢😢😢😢😢😢

  • @brucewayne007
    @brucewayne007 27 днів тому +1

    And this man is a Supreme Court Justice. Who Nominated this “Nominated superstar”?

  • @vernejacobs6019
    @vernejacobs6019 27 днів тому +2

    Why can't judges from lower courts oversee the supreme court? They just have to interpret their code of ethics.

  • @kathleenvangorder5941
    @kathleenvangorder5941 25 днів тому +2

    We need to have a new non-political appointment process for Supreme Court Justices, and term limits. No more lifetime appointments...

  • @emilywilson7308
    @emilywilson7308 27 днів тому +1

    Excellent guest!😊

  • @user-dj6hu9gq4t
    @user-dj6hu9gq4t 25 днів тому +2

    13 districts 13 judges

  • @mikeyang6003
    @mikeyang6003 27 днів тому +1

    SCOTUS is untouchable? WTF!

  • @user-vn4og7zl8p
    @user-vn4og7zl8p 27 днів тому +1

    It's like giving the teacher a apple in school.😅😅😅😅😅

  • @tevrenendrigan1838
    @tevrenendrigan1838 27 днів тому +5

    Here here!
    Congress should absolutely pass some voting rights laws that include "supreme court shall not have power to strike down this law as unconstitutional" clauses.
    If SCOTUS remains this corrupt, we need to take the intermediate step of NOT taking their views as final on the Constitutionality of certain laws. SCOTUS has proven itself irrational/politically motivated/bribed in favor of certain moneyed interests, and not fair arbiters of the law. So long as they remain so we must challenge their nonsense to protect essential rights.
    For example, the 14th Amendment is exactly CONSTITUTIONAL, but the Roberts court can't find its way to obvious rational interpretation. They betray the country, betray We the People, and betray their mandate as judges with so many of their rulings. These corrupt politicians-in-robes are long PAST-DUE for some Checks and Balances!

    • @milfordcivic6755
      @milfordcivic6755 26 днів тому

      Qongress wants to strip voting rights, not expand them.

    • @milfordcivic6755
      @milfordcivic6755 26 днів тому

      Qongress wants to strip voting rights, not expand them.

    • @milfordcivic6755
      @milfordcivic6755 26 днів тому

      Qongress wants to strip voting rights, not expand them.

  • @Curt_Randall
    @Curt_Randall 27 днів тому +2

    Alito could have put a huge sign in his front yard reading "Proud maga supporter lives here" and it would have been no different.

  • @528sunchaser
    @528sunchaser 25 днів тому +2

    Unfortunately, in 2024 thanks to Alito and Thomas, “Supreme Court ethics” is an oxymoron.

  • @kayinsiew2842
    @kayinsiew2842 25 днів тому +1

    Please also remember "Justice" Kavanagh! 😬

  • @aquasands1988
    @aquasands1988 27 днів тому +1

    The actions within this household are enough for Alto to have his "impartiality to be reasonably questioned" he needs to recuse! Full stop!!

  • @sharonhearne5014
    @sharonhearne5014 27 днів тому +2

    One would believe that Alito would be so respectful of his role as a Supreme Court Justice - and the seriousness of that position in the U.S. government - that he would be incredibly sensitive concerning ANY association with controversy or prejudice related to his unique position.

  • @johnwelch6490
    @johnwelch6490 27 днів тому +4

    Yardarms....how convenient.

  • @DonLaBree
    @DonLaBree 27 днів тому +2

    There not personal gifts. They’re bribes!