WW2 German Planes in Japanese Service

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 гру 2022
  • Dr. Mark Felton FRHistS, FRSA, is a well-known British historian, the author of 22 non-fiction books, including bestsellers 'Zero Night' and 'Castle of the Eagles', both currently being developed into movies in Hollywood. In addition to writing, Mark also appears regularly in television documentaries around the world, including on The History Channel, Netflix, National Geographic, Quest, American Heroes Channel and RMC Decouverte. His books have formed the background to several TV and radio documentaries. More information about Mark can be found at: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Fe...
    Visit my audio book channel 'War Stories with Mark Felton': • One Thousand Miles to ...
    Help support my channel:
    www.paypal.me/markfeltonprodu...
    / markfeltonproductions
    Disclaimer: All opinions and comments expressed in the 'Comments' section do not reflect the opinions of Mark Felton Productions. All opinions and comments should contribute to the dialogue. Mark Felton Productions does not condone written attacks, insults, racism, sexism, extremism, violence or otherwise questionable comments or material in the 'Comments' section, and reserves the right to delete any comment violating this rule or to block any poster from the channel.
    Credits: US National Archives; Library of Congress; Bundesarchiv; Mike Freer; capi380; Gaijin; Roland Turner

КОМЕНТАРІ • 750

  • @davidallen8611
    @davidallen8611 Рік тому +496

    When I was in high school my best friend’s grandfather was an engineer and he would tell us about how he went to Germany right after WW2 and the German fighter pilots would take him flying to explain techniques. He then went to Japan to do the same thing with the Japanese’ experimental technology.

    • @madeanaccounttospillthebor9568
      @madeanaccounttospillthebor9568 Рік тому +22

      I would ne extremely hesitant about being a pilot in Japan and using experimental technology.. Has a kind of legacy ya know?

    • @tpl608
      @tpl608 Рік тому +12

      And?
      You write as a click bait website.

    • @noahboat580
      @noahboat580 Рік тому +4

      @@tpl608 describe how they write, i dont know what you mean

    • @tpl608
      @tpl608 Рік тому +6

      @@noahboat580 finish the story. Don't leave people hanging. Like click bait websites.not that difficult to grasp.

    • @tpl608
      @tpl608 Рік тому +3

      @@noahboat580 minimum. State which was better in his opinion

  • @zanenobbs352
    @zanenobbs352 Рік тому +180

    Hi Mark, the crosses on the surrendering Japanese aircraft were actually green on a white background. At each airfield that was surrendering, at least one aircraft was painted all white with green crosses to show cooperation with the surrender, and all propellers were then removed from other aircraft to prevent any last-minute suicide attacks. Initially, during surrender negotiations, the Japanese delegation flew two all-white Mitsubishi G4M "Betty" aircraft with green crosses applied where the Hinomaru would have been placed to meet General MacArthur at Manila, Philippines on 19 August 1945. There are some great details of this mission and the white aircraft with green crosses in "The Rising Sun," by my late friend, John Toland.

    • @tgapete01
      @tgapete01 Рік тому +28

      One of those white painted aircraft surrendered at the end of the war, a Mitsubishi A6M3 Zero now resides in the Auckland War Memorial museum in Auckland New Zealand.

    • @jaredevildog6343
      @jaredevildog6343 Рік тому +6

      He won't respond. He never does.

    • @chrisVNZ
      @chrisVNZ Рік тому +3

      @@tgapete01 I've often wondered why the Zero in the Auckland War Memorial Museum was painted white. Thanks for the info!

  • @Roller_Ghoster
    @Roller_Ghoster Рік тому +276

    Japanese Stukas, Japanese Tiger tanks. This channel expands my mind.

    • @highjumpstudios2384
      @highjumpstudios2384 Рік тому +34

      Don't get too excited. The Japanese tiger tank never shot at anyone.

    • @steffenrosmus9177
      @steffenrosmus9177 Рік тому +12

      @@highjumpstudios2384 that is not correct there were trial in late 1944 with some Sherman wrecks still manned with the dead crew.

    • @wayneantoniazzi2706
      @wayneantoniazzi2706 Рік тому +24

      The Japanese didn't need the Stuka, the Aichi "Val" dive bomber was rugged, reliable, and good enough as it was.

    • @klaus-peterborn1370
      @klaus-peterborn1370 Рік тому +6

      @@wayneantoniazzi2706 And was a construction of Ernst Heinkel.

    • @highjumpstudios2384
      @highjumpstudios2384 Рік тому +2

      @@steffenrosmus9177 source?

  • @milescoleman249
    @milescoleman249 Рік тому +43

    Im a bit sketchy on the exact detail but my uncle ( long past now) Told me when I was a Kid ( 53 years ago) that he was a us army infantry man in new guinea. They came out of the jungle one day and discovered ME 109's on a landing strip. He said everyone was freaked out because they thought " on no! the Germans have gotten this far into the pacific and are helping the Japanese" I appreciate many will think this is made up B.S but he was one of the most stand up people I ever knew and not a liar. I was only 10 years old and didnt have the maturity to ask better questions. Ive always wondered about this so I watched this episode. Still not sure but he was pretty adamant about it and as a old iron worker he didnt tell lies or listen to those who did.

    • @johan-erikjohannesson2796
      @johan-erikjohannesson2796 11 місяців тому +7

      Guessing he saw Ki-61 Hien IJAAF planes. Said planes used inline engines rather than radial engines and therefore looked more like a German or Italian planes. The Japanese used licensed copies of the Daimler engines.

    • @moomoo7706
      @moomoo7706 3 місяці тому

      @@johan-erikjohannesson2796 This is most likely the case. The Ki-61 was originally mistaken for a German aircraft, and the Allied codenames for it reflects this.
      It was originally "Mike", but was later changed to "Tony" as it looked more like an Italian plane than a German one.

  • @amadeusamwater
    @amadeusamwater Рік тому +26

    Because Japan's conquests were spread over a large area of ocean, Japanese planes tended to need to be long range. German planes operated mostly over land, so may not have had the range Japan needed.

    • @wayneantoniazzi2706
      @wayneantoniazzi2706 Рік тому +3

      The range of the Bf-109 was fine for the Luftwaffe's operational doctrine for it, as an interceptor and local air-supremacy fighter. Until it wasn't.

  • @augustosolari7721
    @augustosolari7721 Рік тому +221

    Japan also licensed the DB 601 from Daimler. Their KI-61 looked very similar to a German or Italian fighter, being the only Japanese fighter produced with in-line engine.

    • @locutus155
      @locutus155 Рік тому +16

      Remember that the Ki 100 was a Ki 61 airframe retrofitted with a Mitsubishi kensai radial engine when the factory building the Kawasaki Ha 40 inline was destroyed by a earthquake. Ironically the Ki 100 turned out to a superior aircraft and upgrades originally planned for the Ki 61 airframe were set up on the Ki 100 in series.

    • @cozduntow9346
      @cozduntow9346 Рік тому +4

      Ki-10 would like a word, and not to nitpick but it’s a V no?

    • @hitomarusensha
      @hitomarusensha Рік тому +31

      People often attribute the Ki-61 to some kind of copy of European fighter design but the reason they looked European was because the lead designer, Takeo Doi, was trained by Dr. Richard Vought to be his successor in aircraft design. He spent a long time learning fighter design from a European and spent many years in Europe learning aircraft design so he made an aircraft that looked somewhat European. If you learned how to design a castle in Japan and then were asked to build a castle in Europe the result would look Japanese more than likely.

    • @bitai683
      @bitai683 Рік тому +1

      ki 32 didnt use a radial engine

    • @Kman31ca
      @Kman31ca Рік тому +1

      @@hitomarusensha Yup, this is accurate.

  • @adamconroy2146
    @adamconroy2146 Рік тому +169

    I had heard of these weapons being shipped to the Japanese before, but had no idea of how relatively prolific the relationship had become in regards to secret tech being exchanged. I often wonder how affected ww2 would have become if Radar was shared with the Japanese also.
    Thanks again Mark.

    • @tomt373
      @tomt373 Рік тому +3

      That and the atomic bomb, eh? 😄

    • @JunkerWhoop
      @JunkerWhoop Рік тому +41

      @@tomt373 Well, the US did share it with Japan. Twice.

    • @wayneantoniazzi2706
      @wayneantoniazzi2706 Рік тому +29

      The Japanese did have radar and it was certainly being used by 1944 when the B-29 raids started. However assuming it was copied from Germn radar it wouldn't have been as good as allied radar was. German technicians managed to recover and repair a radar set from a crashed British aircraft and were surprised at how good it was, much better than their own.

    • @danbrown5736
      @danbrown5736 Рік тому +2

      @@JunkerWhoop heh

    • @braamvorster8249
      @braamvorster8249 Рік тому +4

      The Germans did not have an effective radar early in the war. The British did though

  • @nordicson2835
    @nordicson2835 Рік тому +31

    It us a shame that things were destroyed without a thought to the historical value they hold. Another informative and enjoyable post , thank you.

    • @groupb9420
      @groupb9420 Рік тому +9

      Maybe because at the time they weren't thinking 80 years down the road, everything built was relatively new for the time.

    • @jesusramirezromo2037
      @jesusramirezromo2037 Рік тому +2

      They basically destroyed everything that would worsen their punishment, and basically pretended to be a lesser evil than Germany

    • @wayneantoniazzi2706
      @wayneantoniazzi2706 Рік тому +8

      Historic preservation wasn't really thought of at the time, people who lived through WW2 wanted to put the nightmare behind them as quickly as possible. I can't really blame them.

    • @binaway
      @binaway Рік тому +2

      There was so much produced and captured and not everything could be preserved. There was also a lot of rebuilding to be done which at the time was a lot more important.

  • @TRHARTAmericanArtist
    @TRHARTAmericanArtist Рік тому +15

    As a young man I was fortunate to know a German fighter pilot. He flew all of the planes including the first combat jet the Me-262. He liked the 109, but said that landing was dangerous due to the landing gear being very close. The Focke Wulf he said was more comfortable and fast, but there was nothing close to the 262 for him. We never discussed fire power as it was a delicate subject.

    • @wayneantoniazzi2706
      @wayneantoniazzi2706 Рік тому +4

      That jibes with an interview I saw on the History Channel years back with a Luftwaffe veteran. He said that once off the ground the 109 was easy to fly but takeoffs and landings called for 100% of your attention, nothing less would do. If you kept your mind on your work you were fine.

    • @TRHARTAmericanArtist
      @TRHARTAmericanArtist Рік тому +2

      @@wayneantoniazzi2706 He also told me that they lost 48 trainees to accidents out of 150 before the war and that they learned on biplanes from the first world war. They had to land square back then and because he was short (most fliers came from the cavalry in WW1) and the planes were for taller guys, he had to pull himself up in the cock pit to land his plane. The landing carriage had no pistons but a sort of chord he described like a heavy rubber band. He was a nice old guy and became an American citizen after flying his 262 to Greece to surrender to the British. He was sent to intercept, but had other ideas. 😏

    • @wayneantoniazzi2706
      @wayneantoniazzi2706 Рік тому

      @@TRHARTAmericanArtist Thanks for that! Those heavy rubber bands are pretty much the same as bungee tie-down chords you can find in hardware stores today. Builders of WW1 airplane replicas use bungees the in the same manner they were used 100 years ago.

  • @r2gelfand
    @r2gelfand Рік тому +33

    I was just about ready to ask if the Germans ever tested any Japanese aircraft and you took the words right out of my mouth!😁

  • @MPGunther1
    @MPGunther1 Рік тому +1

    All of your information is always very interesting. Thank you Dr. Felton

  • @aaronlopez492
    @aaronlopez492 Рік тому +25

    Dr. Felton, you are correct this was rather surprising to me. I never knew that there were so many 109s and 190s. Thank you much.

    • @12what34the
      @12what34the Рік тому +2

      If I'm not mistaken, the Bf/Me 109 (all variants) is the most produced aircraft of all time, 30k made or so I think

  • @SailingStarCatcher
    @SailingStarCatcher Рік тому +2

    Another outstanding piece of historical work. Thanks Doc

  • @randyminnick5031
    @randyminnick5031 Рік тому

    Well done! Another excellent video, sir! Thank you!

  • @mattgeorge90
    @mattgeorge90 Рік тому

    Thank you for sharing this!

  • @chrisstonestreet5296
    @chrisstonestreet5296 Рік тому +1

    Best videos on WW2. Dr Felton's videos are interesting and always engaging.

  • @russellavenson8557
    @russellavenson8557 Рік тому +3

    Another amazing video keep up the great work!

  • @NunyaBizznaz
    @NunyaBizznaz Рік тому

    You cover subjects that I have never seen before, and that is impressive because I have followed WWII history for decades. Well done Mark Felton!

  • @kiowafourty964
    @kiowafourty964 Рік тому +10

    Thank you, Mark Felton, for all your work in making these awesome videos. I have yet to find one that doesn't make me excited to watch. Thank you!

  • @LuisVillanuevaCubero
    @LuisVillanuevaCubero Рік тому +1

    Amazing content as always!

  • @carlosfaliveni2442
    @carlosfaliveni2442 Рік тому +59

    Siempre se aprenden cosas nuevas e interesantes con Mark Felton.

  • @matthewmcmacken6716
    @matthewmcmacken6716 Рік тому +1

    I did find this very interesting. Danke', Dr. Felton. Oh, and I look forward to reading the book you mentioned you wrote. Cheers.

  • @peterkirgan2921
    @peterkirgan2921 Рік тому +1

    hi dr mark peter here from Australia love your channel ! please keep it up & take care doctor !!!

  • @babuzzard6470
    @babuzzard6470 Рік тому +1

    You never disappoint Mark, thanks so much👍.

  • @RenerDeCastro
    @RenerDeCastro Рік тому +132

    War Thunder actually featured several of these Japanese German planes as Premium vehicles in the Japanese Tech Tree.

    • @gergoszabo7168
      @gergoszabo7168 Рік тому +3

      Why the hell everytime when WW2 vehicles is the topic every war thunder peasant banzai it
      Bruh wt is such a shitty game below average p2w game

    • @wesleysayud419
      @wesleysayud419 Рік тому +14

      Eg. Fw-190, Bf 109, etc.

    • @kalui96
      @kalui96 Рік тому +11

      The A7He1 is pretty cool

    • @EncrypticMethods
      @EncrypticMethods Рік тому +5

      HE-100D -1 was one of my favorite low tier f2p planes.. despite the small caliber mgs. It can close the distance incredibly fast and 1,500 rounds can pepper the shit out of any plane.

    • @EncrypticMethods
      @EncrypticMethods Рік тому +10

      I also find it fascinating that Japan actually had several he-100s in their air force.

  • @danielgreen3715
    @danielgreen3715 Рік тому

    Your Videos are a must see Mr Felton Thankyou for All the Arcane facts you come out with

  • @devonwhetenhale8828
    @devonwhetenhale8828 Рік тому

    I'm blown away by the pics and vids you have! So cool! 😎Thnks Mark!

  • @robertchubb5602
    @robertchubb5602 Рік тому

    As always....GREAT and SUPERB content......as expected.

  • @craigtanner6916
    @craigtanner6916 Рік тому +19

    Fascinating as always! These stories are the rest of the fabric of ww2, to which many would be unknown if not for your incredible research and telling them in an objective style which is beyond commendable. I always look forward to seeing your latest fascinating story from “ between the main threads “ of ww2 history. Thank you for all your extraordinary hard work bringing these videos to us. A treasure for sure!

    • @shelbyseelbach9568
      @shelbyseelbach9568 Рік тому

      They aren't the rest of the fabric, but they are definitely more of the fabric.

  • @michaelsnyder3871
    @michaelsnyder3871 Рік тому +7

    Actually, the Luftwaffe was very interested in the Ki.46 recon aircraft. The Ki.46-III in particular was fast at high altitudes that reduced Allied intercepts despite radar warnings. They were given access to the aircraft in Japan and the plans of the aircraft and were prepared to pay for a license but were finally turned down by the IJAAF in late 1944.

  • @marioborkowski5894
    @marioborkowski5894 Рік тому +11

    Again, this is awesome little nugget of history.Thank You Mark.

    • @damien5748
      @damien5748 Рік тому

      Said it MANY times before and will say it AGAIN....the so called "History Channell" on tv can learn a LOT from Dr Felton.👍👍👍

  • @russwoodward8251
    @russwoodward8251 Рік тому

    Extremely interesting and unique history. Thank you Dr. Felton.

  • @Anlushac11
    @Anlushac11 Рік тому +10

    The Nakajima Kikka was based on notes, drawings, and descriptions of the Me-262. Later, Japan got more detailed info on the Me-262 and were able to design a more closely related aircraft, the Nakajima Ki-201 Karyu.

    • @_qaz_
      @_qaz_ Рік тому +3

      Kikka and Karyuu were developed at approximately the same time. There was no better data, as no submarines arrived after that point. Kikka was just an indigenous aircraft, while Karyuu was based on Me 262A.

  • @ronaldwatson1951
    @ronaldwatson1951 Рік тому

    Very informative and interesting info. Great video

  • @patrickf2671
    @patrickf2671 Рік тому

    I found it incredibly interesting Dr Felton.....As always...Thank You.

  • @lappin6482
    @lappin6482 Рік тому

    great video as always....looking forward to purchasing your book "the fujita plan"

  • @wsg909
    @wsg909 Рік тому +9

    Thanks for your great work Mark. A story I’d be very interested in is what really happened with the Canadian built Avro Arrow interceptor jet if you would consider that.

  • @basichistory
    @basichistory Рік тому

    Fascinating video, well done.

  • @jfh9219
    @jfh9219 Рік тому +4

    Loved this!!

  • @brafianblackfyre9220
    @brafianblackfyre9220 Рік тому +5

    from the thumbnail, I thought it was a war thunder premium review

  • @georgestemple3310
    @georgestemple3310 Рік тому

    Another excellent video thank you

  • @salvagedb2470
    @salvagedb2470 Рік тому

    Great Dr Felton , My favourite twin Engined the Dinah its Perfection ..Great Vid as always.

  • @gravychipplease
    @gravychipplease Рік тому

    Outstanding information (as usual)

  • @bobcosmic
    @bobcosmic Рік тому +8

    Another gem from Dr Felton !

  • @davidlondon9002
    @davidlondon9002 Рік тому

    Enjoyed! Good one!

  • @daystatesniper01
    @daystatesniper01 Рік тому

    Superb as per usual good Sir.

  • @andrewpinner3181
    @andrewpinner3181 Рік тому

    Thanks Mark !
    That was all new to me.

  • @paulmurphy42
    @paulmurphy42 Рік тому

    Keep 'em coming Mark!

  • @paulpowell4871
    @paulpowell4871 Рік тому

    Always a Pleasure hanging with Mark.....

  • @RattyFlyer
    @RattyFlyer Рік тому

    I'm finally subscribing to all the channels I love. Keep up the good work. Subscribed today and hit the Bell. Don't tell the history guy but I like your videos better. :)

  • @dutybod1
    @dutybod1 Рік тому +4

    Just to point out Mark that it`s not an ME109 but a BF109 messerschmitt. Thanks for all you do for history buffs.

    • @Sturminfantrist
      @Sturminfantrist Рік тому +1

      Yes its a Bf 108 or Bf109 , Bf110 for Bayrische Flugzeugwerke but Me210/410 or Me262 is correct .
      another mistake is the He112B-ohhh , its not an Ohh its a Zero/0, its allways a number behind the Dash - not a letter, aircraft with zero/0 are called the Nullserie (zeroseries) in german in german aircraftproduction, hes a historian he should know such things
      Same joke like calling the Spit MKV a SpitMK Vee or SpitMKIX a Mk ay ex

  • @PhilipReeder
    @PhilipReeder Рік тому

    Good video Mark!

  • @jasonmussett2129
    @jasonmussett2129 Рік тому

    Excellent video👍

  • @eltenda
    @eltenda Рік тому

    Great video! 👍

  • @foxtayle683
    @foxtayle683 Рік тому +60

    It's nuts that the Japanese didn't mass produce the FW 190. They had a rare gem there.

    • @muhammadnursyahmi9440
      @muhammadnursyahmi9440 Рік тому +27

      Japan never had the industrial capability of US, nor Germany. It was even smaller than Italy in term of industrial capabilities during WW2.

    • @hitomarusensha
      @hitomarusensha Рік тому +18

      The reason they didn't was because they felt they had good fighters as well which they did. In the research documents of the staff that reviewed German fighters they found the offer of a production license interesting but had very little interest as their fighters were comparable or fit their need better. I have a video from an expert on the subject of the zero and alot of myths around Japanese aircraft "inferiority" that explains it in more detail if interested.

    • @PassportToPimlico
      @PassportToPimlico Рік тому +9

      I think that by the time they got the FW190, they were considering their own improved fighters and the delay in setting up production of a new foreign plane was too long..

    • @jumpinjehoshaphat9075
      @jumpinjehoshaphat9075 Рік тому +3

      @@hitomarusensha post the video, provide a link?

    • @iota515
      @iota515 Рік тому +2

      @@hitomarusensha The video states that the evaluators of FW190 found it better in many regards to their contemporary japanese fighters.

  • @richardcharay7788
    @richardcharay7788 Рік тому

    Enjoyed, thanks!

  • @Danekim_
    @Danekim_ Рік тому +2

    Can’t wait until dr Felton drops the Hess series videos 🎉❤

  • @Bullitt3401
    @Bullitt3401 Рік тому +6

    There was a good documentary on the history channel in the early 2000s. I think it was called Secret Japanese Aircraft Of WWII. I still have it recorded on VHS. It's worth checking out if you can find it.

  • @carthy29
    @carthy29 Рік тому +4

    Brilliant yet again, came across a good story recently about the free french air squadron using spitfires who fought on the russian side on the eastern front as a french unit , they did well during battle of kursk

    • @MDzmitry
      @MDzmitry Рік тому

      If you're talking about "Normandie-Nieman", they never flew Spitfires. They flew Yak fighters instead.
      And there were no other Free French squadrons on the Eastern front.

  • @dwinegardner8251
    @dwinegardner8251 Рік тому

    Yes, very interesting. Thank you Dr. Felton.

  • @andysvehiclehistorychannel
    @andysvehiclehistorychannel Рік тому

    An amazing video Mark

  • @McRocket
    @McRocket Рік тому

    I did find it very interesting.
    Thank you.

  • @scottroberts7875
    @scottroberts7875 Рік тому +1

    Thank you Professor Felton. Incredible and absolutely fascinating. Brilliant as always ATVB2U Scott Somerset

  • @mattblom3990
    @mattblom3990 Рік тому +5

    I appreciate this video as well as Dr. Felton's first book (which I will be purchasing). While not nearly as extensive in quantity as the Allies, there was substantial sharing of technology between the Axis and the Japanese shipped back rare metals and substances to Germany as well.

  • @pittbullking87
    @pittbullking87 Рік тому +3

    Wow, how interesting! I knew there was some trade between the two but I did not know how much. I didn't know there was a U-boat base in Panang, Malaya either.

  • @SEANSMART30
    @SEANSMART30 Рік тому +9

    This reminded me of a Japanese comic series called Luftwaffe 1946, which was published in English but quite hard to find now, which was set in an alternative World War 2 where the most modern German weapons had reached Imperial Japan and joined making the war drag on.

    • @SuperTimebandit
      @SuperTimebandit Рік тому +2

      They used a Black Focke Wulf Ta if i remind me correctly

    • @ghjjfrs7211
      @ghjjfrs7211 Рік тому

      Nice avatar. Did you ever watch The Hidden Fortress?

    • @djzrobzombie2813
      @djzrobzombie2813 Рік тому

      Mark Felton productions....promote that lord and lady landlord scam ... Also that Fake kamikoto knifes made in Japan ( they where not made in Japan ) 😂😂😂9

  • @somethingelse4878
    @somethingelse4878 Рік тому

    Very interesting Mark, thank you

  • @jagapatto
    @jagapatto Рік тому +1

    I live right next to Tachikawa. This area has always been a center of Japanese aviation. I live under the flight path of Yokata Air Base--a joint USAF and JSDF installation. I love this history.

  • @willyboyw.5771
    @willyboyw.5771 Рік тому

    I just bought your "Ghost Riders" book Mark, looking forward to reading it.

  • @HirooKoslov
    @HirooKoslov Рік тому +6

    The He-100 is actually a pretty cool aircraft, it had an unusual cooling system, where it would use the wings as radiators. Though this meant it was a poor fit for combat, as the first hit to the wings would likely result in a coolant leak.

    • @kidpagronprimsank05
      @kidpagronprimsank05 Рік тому

      Almost entire plane to be precise.

    • @0Turbox
      @0Turbox Рік тому

      Other planes used the wings for fuel tanks and stored ammo for their wing mounted guns. No plane would look good getting hit by incendiary rounds at these places.

  • @johnaldred6864
    @johnaldred6864 Рік тому

    Great video .... 👍

  • @aaronfrizzel3821
    @aaronfrizzel3821 Рік тому

    I'm loving the new font

  • @MiKeMiDNiTe-77
    @MiKeMiDNiTe-77 Рік тому

    Wow great episode

  • @slick4401
    @slick4401 Рік тому

    Very interesting. Thank you.

  • @TBagr
    @TBagr Рік тому

    Holy cow! Dr. Felton with another avalanche of knowledge.

  • @briankorn6988
    @briankorn6988 Рік тому

    Interesting video!

  • @MrXdmp
    @MrXdmp Рік тому +5

    Thanks Dr. Felton!

  • @REM1956
    @REM1956 Рік тому

    Excellent, as usual.

  • @thomaslundy5123
    @thomaslundy5123 Рік тому +5

    1) The crosses of the Japanese surrender markings were specified to be green, not black-I believe that most were, in fact, green.
    2) Some sources state that the example of the FW 190's engine mount helped the engineers at Kawasaki re-engine the Ki 61 to create the excellent Ki 100.

  • @justanotherviewer52
    @justanotherviewer52 Рік тому

    Thanks Mark.

  • @jacobb17
    @jacobb17 Рік тому

    Just want to say that I love your videos.

  • @jensenwilliam5434
    @jensenwilliam5434 Рік тому

    Thank you Mark!!!

  • @MCMilitaryForce
    @MCMilitaryForce Рік тому +1

    The intro music never gets old

  • @josephnardone1250
    @josephnardone1250 Рік тому

    Very interesting and to me a previously unknown bit of history.

  • @chrisrouser8452
    @chrisrouser8452 Рік тому

    Thanks!

  • @1957bat
    @1957bat Рік тому +2

    Suprising how many of us Blokes at work are fans of Mark's excellent documentaries.

  • @toddewire13
    @toddewire13 Рік тому +2

    Thank you Mark always a pleasure!

  • @CompetentSalesUSA
    @CompetentSalesUSA Рік тому

    Thank you

  • @roscoewhite3793
    @roscoewhite3793 Рік тому

    It's 0044 AEST here, and a Mark Felton video appears just as I'm about to log off... ah, sleep can wait!

  • @samshepperrd
    @samshepperrd Рік тому

    Astounding detail.

  • @obiemichaels9675
    @obiemichaels9675 Рік тому

    Thanks Mark and to answer your question yes I found it very interesting

  • @MikeG42
    @MikeG42 Рік тому +3

    That Messerschmitt Bf 109E looks good in Japanese markings. Same with the FW-190.

  • @montydendron1
    @montydendron1 Рік тому +1

    First class narration.

  • @tpl608
    @tpl608 Рік тому

    Love you stuff, Dr. Felton. With that spirit, this video went on too long.

  • @JawbolingWoW
    @JawbolingWoW Рік тому +9

    Thank you for blessing us with another history lesson!

  • @aaradhyaraijada2710
    @aaradhyaraijada2710 Рік тому +1

    Mark!! Huge fan ….would love it if you made a video on the SAS rouge heroes….like the accuracy…who were the real heroes and their fates….any hidden less used equipment or vehicles in the series….and overall….like lots there…just a suggestion!!!but would be amazed

  • @jehoiakimelidoronila5450
    @jehoiakimelidoronila5450 Рік тому +1

    About the Japanese kikka ("orange blossom"), there's another design that closely resembles the swallow (262) and that is the ki-201 karyu ("fire dragon") fighter-bomber, also built by Nakajima for the army air force that predated the kikka, which is a fast attack bomber for the navy Air service
    I say design because plans to build it fell through & the orange blossom instead became the 1st Japanese jet

  • @TankerBricks
    @TankerBricks Рік тому

    Mark. Thanks for providing my Wednesday night entertainment!

  • @Rusty_Gold85
    @Rusty_Gold85 Рік тому

    Another excellant "Did you know?" from the Professor

  • @matthewlok3020
    @matthewlok3020 Рік тому +31

    The zero is a navy aircraft and had nothing to do with the army as the Japanese army and navy were at odds at best then. The army had the Ki-43 Hayabusa which had similar capabilities with the Zero

    • @muhammadnursyahmi9440
      @muhammadnursyahmi9440 Рік тому +8

      That's the biggest understatement i have ever read in this comment section.

    • @WALTERBROADDUS
      @WALTERBROADDUS Рік тому

      Not really a necessary comment there Matthew.

    • @derekowens1817
      @derekowens1817 Рік тому +1

      @@WALTERBROADDUS if the Japanese Army elected not to adopt a short ranged German aircraft because they had access to the A6M2 then, clearly it is a necessary comment, the A6M2 being used by the Navy, not the Army. Mr Felton's comment in this respect is clearly erroneous, just like the "black surrender crosses", which were actually green. D

    • @WALTERBROADDUS
      @WALTERBROADDUS Рік тому

      @@derekowens1817 Mr Felton and the rest of the world already knows the Imperial Army did not use the a6m. And if the biggest takeaway of a 15 minute video is a paint color? You're really reaching for something to comment on.

    • @derekowens1817
      @derekowens1817 Рік тому +1

      @@WALTERBROADDUS triggered muchly, are we? Clearly Mr Felton has made a mistake associating the A6M2 with the Japanese Army, as it was a Navy fighter, the Army had no interest in it, and never used it in any way, shape or form. He's made an error, simple as. Matthew's earlier comment clearly more necessary than your dross, simple as. D