Sir you are teaching in a very simple way. And I can see how much you have done hard work to make these lecture videos. Teachers like you are needed at each and every college/universities/school in our country who can teach like you. I am post graduated from BHU , I liked your lecture very much. And I will suggest students to go through your lectures. Thank you sir.
Hats off to you for including the code It is often confusing to just have the BE curve plotted in books without actually having a base to do it Love this extra efforts from your side Keep it up. This makes your channel unique
Sir i am chemistry student but i learnt a lot of basics in nuclear chemistry from your lectures, your communication and teaching is excellent . Pls continue your amazing wrk
खरं पाहता हा माझा मूळ विषय नाही. माझा विषय विद्युत अभियांत्रिकी आहे. आपलं खूप कौतुक वाटतं, इतक्या सुंदर पद्धतीने विषयाचे विवेचन करता! अभिनंदन. हीच पद्धत काही ग्रंथामध्ये उपाविष्ट केली आहे का आणि तसं प्रथम मांडणारी पाश्चिमात्य व्यक्ती कोण? ह्या बाबत तुमच्या कडून अधिक जाणून घ्यावयाचे होते. अनुषंगाने त्यात काही प्रश्न उपस्थित होतात त्याविषयी बोलावयाचे आहे. मनस्वी धन्यवाद.
Hi sir, First i need to say thanks for the wonderful lecture that u presented. U r explaining the topic in a simple way that everyone can easily understand. So sir plz continue this wonderful thing.
Teaching, maybe...but depends on what you are trying to teach. This feels like an explanation but in reality it is a summary of how others have tackled the question but not really explained the experimental results.
Great video. You have the surface energy and the Coulombic energy both negative. Does this mean the surface effect tends to try to make the nucleus expand? If so, would this be different from a liquid drop where the surface tension tends to prevent expansion? Thanks
"Directly analogous" definitely not "equal to" or necessarily "similar"...the liquid drop model does not fully account for observational evidence. I think I am right? Yes?
i am very late but the nucleons at the surface will have lesser number of surrounding nucleons to interact with that's why we introduce a correction term to offset the volume term which solely by itself assumes all particle will have same number of nucleons to bind to
Every charge is at a different radial distance. So u integrate infinitesimal charge over radial distance. This contains the total charge as a product, so u need to divide it to get average (1/r). If u still have difficulty, imagine any other property like mass etc instead of charge
Like your work, but I am sorry to say there is NOT "good agreement" with the experimental data. Having derived the three most probably significant component expressions for B, you don't even plot the experimental data on the same graph! So while the overall shape may be the same, the actual values may not agree, and more significantly, there is no explanation for the saw teeth (or anomalously low values) on the ascending part of the curve when A and Z are small. Simply looking up the coefficients on google doesn't cut it.
Next Video : Semi Empirical BE Formula / Corrections to Liquid Drop Model ua-cam.com/video/GeLC1AUC0W8/v-deo.html
Thank you
Sir please make a video on bohr wheeler theory of nuclear fission. Please sir.
Sir you are teaching in a very simple way. And I can see how much you have done hard work to make these lecture videos. Teachers like you are needed at each and every college/universities/school in our country who can teach like you. I am post graduated from BHU , I liked your lecture very much. And I will suggest students to go through your lectures. Thank you sir.
This is a great explanation! Many thanks from Missouri.
Thank you :)
Sir you are the one of the best teacher of physics I am a student of msc physics and it's very helpful to me .
Thanks alot sir 🙏🙏
Loud, clear, conceptual nd intresting one explaination .
Welldone sir.
Appreciation from🇵🇰
Hats off to you for including the code
It is often confusing to just have the BE curve plotted in books without actually having a base to do it
Love this extra efforts from your side
Keep it up. This makes your channel unique
Trust me my college professors are sharing your videos for better understanding. Great explaination
Sir i am chemistry student but i learnt a lot of basics in nuclear chemistry from your lectures, your communication and teaching is excellent . Pls continue your amazing wrk
Your teaching style is far far far better than many reputed colleges here in kolkata,west bengal...love from West bengal,kolkata🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Kudos, this is the only solution by far which explains the JEE Advanced 2022 question on the coulombic interactions
The best Playlist for nuclear physics😍... From very clear idea about liquid drop model💧 to plotting graph📈.. Without a doubt.. THE BEST ❤️
One of the most detailed video on this topic , thank you for uploading such a quality educational video!!!!!
Just in love by the ways u oversimplify the concepts in ur videos😍
Did you mean that? I mean did you praise OVERsimplification?
It's really shows that you love the physics. You are a great teacher. May god fulfill your all desires 😇😇😇
U r the best best teacher I have seen in My whole life...🙋🙋💆💆
खरं पाहता हा माझा मूळ विषय नाही. माझा विषय विद्युत अभियांत्रिकी आहे. आपलं खूप कौतुक वाटतं, इतक्या सुंदर पद्धतीने विषयाचे विवेचन करता! अभिनंदन. हीच पद्धत काही ग्रंथामध्ये उपाविष्ट केली आहे का आणि तसं प्रथम मांडणारी पाश्चिमात्य व्यक्ती कोण? ह्या बाबत तुमच्या कडून अधिक जाणून घ्यावयाचे होते. अनुषंगाने त्यात काही प्रश्न उपस्थित होतात त्याविषयी बोलावयाचे आहे. मनस्वी धन्यवाद.
Hi sir, First i need to say thanks for the wonderful lecture that u presented. U r explaining the topic in a simple way that everyone can easily understand. So sir plz continue this wonderful thing.
Physics is love . I appreciated your work sir .many many thanks .from Pakistan swat
Where were you, all my years of U G course...
Thats damn clear and point wise...
Thank you for such encouraging words :)
Sir! You explan very well....😍😍😎 I become big fan of you.. & suggest my classmate to watch videos..
Sir ur teaching style is simply superb and plz upload vedios on atomic and molecular physics also plzzz sir ,ur teaching is very helpful to me sir.
Brilliant! You are the future of India!
Teaching, maybe...but depends on what you are trying to teach. This feels like an explanation but in reality it is a summary of how others have tackled the question but not really explained the experimental results.
Thank you sir so much. Easy to understand the concept 😇😇😇😇.
Sir your lecture make me to love physics u r a genius sir
thank you, this was a very useful and clear video, I understand a lot about the liquid drop model, thanks
Sound quality is not so good in this video....
Rest is all good.
Flow and clarity. Hats off, sir!!!
Valeu!
Sir u explain amazingly
Sir probably u a great teacher in your area
Thank u for the kind words :)
Great video. You have the surface energy and the Coulombic energy both negative. Does this mean the surface effect tends to try to make the nucleus expand? If so, would this be different from a liquid drop where the surface tension tends to prevent expansion? Thanks
Thank you! Best teacher ever!
great explanation, better than professors
Very nice sir..
Love from pakistan
Amazing sir, Hope we reach there soon, now we are just on plotting🙂
Bahut hi shandarrrr🙏🏻❤️
Thank you so much for this clear explanation would you please suggest a book to study nuclear physics
Very well presented!
Very well explained .You are Awesome
Great great explanation...🙌🙌
thanks sir. your lecture helps a lot
Sir can you write a code for probability and expectation value of particle in 3 D box. Please Sir.
Sir where can i get the link to your posts on 8physics.?
Excellent lectures
Great explanation!
A great love form Pakistani students ❤❤
Audio contain soo many noice
Very helpful sir 😊!
Keep up the great work!
Very nice explanation sir
The electrostatic energy has a factor of 3/5. Something wrong in computing the Coulomb energy?
Thank you sir for your clear explanation.
Why you derived r(avg) in terms of R, a its going to absorbed in arbitrary constant?
By the way, great work sir...
Hello sir...🙏 I want to know about bohr wheeler theory of nuclear fission .pls upload a video about it sir
Sounds is no clear sir....
Sir your are awesome. But if u explain in hindi that will be best 👍💯. Sir u have great knowledge
Nice explain sir
Thank you so much.
Thank u very much sir nice teaching
Please suggest good text book for nuclear physics. (net preparation)
What about Asymmetry energy term and pairing energy term, next video, right?
Yes, its discussed in the next video ua-cam.com/video/GeLC1AUC0W8/v-deo.html
Where is the link ???
Can you make a series on Scilab for Physics students? There is a scarcity for good material on Scilab on the internet for us students.
Yes i can do that. Will keep that in my list of future videos
Nice explanation. Which book you follow for this lecture.
"Directly analogous" definitely not "equal to" or necessarily "similar"...the liquid drop model does not fully account for observational evidence. I think I am right? Yes?
Please background noise ko thoda kam karo...awaaz clear nhi h
sir, why nuclei stability dec when surface area inc.
i am very late but the nucleons at the surface will have lesser number of surrounding nucleons to interact with that's why we introduce a correction term to offset the volume term which solely by itself assumes all particle will have same number of nucleons to bind to
very good sir
Very good explanation... Sir can you tell me name of software which is used to plot graph
Scilab
Thank You sir
Sir pls improve sound quality .rest all is good
sound is low
Sound is very poor😢
Good one.
Do these videos cover net syllabus of nuclear physics?
Partial syllabus u can say
Great sir
Please continue further please
Sir background me noise thoda jyada hai please solve the issue
Sir please make a video on Partial wave analysis of reaction cross section
v nice sir
sir can u make a video on on
role of nculear fission in liqiuid drop model (plzz sir)
Super sir...
How is 1/ravg=1/Q integral dq/r
Every charge is at a different radial distance. So u integrate infinitesimal charge over radial distance. This contains the total charge as a product, so u need to divide it to get average (1/r). If u still have difficulty, imagine any other property like mass etc instead of charge
Look up all my videos on Nuclear and Particle Physics in the following playlist : ua-cam.com/play/PLRN3HroZGu2n_j3Snd_fSYNLvCkao8HIx.html
With the sounds of the streets, I feel like being an indian student.
Who is here after NTA(in JEE MAIN APRIL ATTEMPT 2023) dropped a question from this topic .. although it's out of syllabus 😢
lmfao us
Like your work, but I am sorry to say there is NOT "good agreement" with the experimental data.
Having derived the three most probably significant component expressions for B, you don't even plot the experimental data on the same graph! So while the overall shape may be the same, the actual values may not agree, and more significantly, there is no explanation for the saw teeth (or anomalously low values) on the ascending part of the curve when A and Z are small. Simply looking up the coefficients on google doesn't cut it.
Love
Sir can u explain this hindi also
💖💖💖💖💖
Not good sound quality..sir improve although your informative vidio than other
sir aap bahut fast bolte hai
Pls speak slowly.I can’t catch the all words
Chop😡
bkwas urdu mr record kro angree ki bacchy