Making Music in an Artificial World
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 тра 2024
- Many of us are rightfully concerned about the impact of A.I. on music and the arts as a whole. What are our primary concerns, and more importantly, how will artists navigate this changing landscape without losing hope?
Watch the entire performance from the beginning of the video: • Artifice - Jameson Na...
FREE Composition Guide eBook:
bit.ly/FREEcompositionguide
FREE Synthesis Workshop:
bit.ly/synthworkshop
My Sample Packs: store.fracturedcapstan.com/
My music:
Music Channel: / @jamesonnathanjonesmusic
Spotify: bit.ly/JNJSpotify
Apple Music: bit.ly/JNJAppleMusic
Bandcamp: bit.ly/JNJBandcamp
///////
Socials and Stuff:
/ jamesonnathanjones
/ jnathanjones
If you're an artist or composer, here are some of the composition concepts that have helped me make music: bit.ly/FREEcompositionguide
If you'd like to see my entire duet with a robot: ua-cam.com/video/8vnOFEci0CA/v-deo.html
Pretty amazing video but I have to ask myself, are you real? Or did AI make this and the background sounds to make us more scared to stop making music?
I came for the tutorial, I stayed for the lovely ''bocause'', I'm now returning for the philosophy. You won't probably see this but thank you sir.
big ups for not having giant red arrows pointing down and a huge bold font saying ITS OVER in all red and yellow. We should not support channels that doom click bait all the time.
I'm a graphic designer and as you may know, we were impacted by AI first. We were terrified. Now, more than a year later, I think I can share some first hand experience - not much has changed really. As you said - AIs are not developed as tools, but not because evil corporations, but because the essence of the technology behind it. It is great for instant creation of complete "a pretty image", but not for gradual process of creating and adjusting "the pretty image". As such, they are completely unsuitable for client-designer back and forth - a lot of commisions on popular freelance platforms have strict "no AI" clauses, because clients burned themselves with cheap "AI artists" who could not handle a simple revision. Graphic models are also devolving - initial models were creative, but imperfect, newer are "perfect" in a photorealistic sense, but way less creative. As a result of this evolution and oversaturation of samey images, people learned how to recognise AI images and are tired of them. With music I suppose it will be exactly the same. Samey background music for commercials or Starbucks will be AI created, but more personally involved clients will still desire human made product and genuine interaction with artists making the music for them.
Now on the whole "democratisation" argument. We heard it too. "Now I can finally create what I see in my head" was/is a very popular argument coming from people who don't really know what "I see in my head" means in case of actual graphic designers. We perfectly know that AI is not creating what we see in our heads. Even more so - trying to get anything resembling what we see is a path to frustration, because it simply can't understand us well enough. The bottom line is - after the initial surge of interest, people will move away from "creating" AI music, because it does not express them. It can't, it only expresses itself.
Great insights. Spot on.
I’ve been attempting my own ambient generative music forms since prior to OpenAI grabbing the spotlight in people’s lives. A lot of people instantly seem to say things like “it’s just an AI” about my music. Not the case. I make the rules in advance to see what plays out, and adjust.
That’s the opposite of “just an AI” but there isn’t much hope I don’t think of anyone paying attention to that reality any more. In our post-reality world, it’s a lot easier, and SEO-ier to say “you’re just using an AI.” People find that easier to understand than anything else. In a gamifying post-meaning world, lowest hanging fruit wins.
Can confirm this mentality was present LONG before “the internet” reached prominence front of mind. Now it’s being selected more as the default.
I hate to bubble pop you, but OpenAi's newest model GPT-4o can actually do revisions now, and it can handle putting text on images, and it can even slice together 3D models. You have to remember this technology is getting better with every revision. Judging the landscape of what AI is/will be right now is tough, because it's like trying to predict what computers are like now based on what you could do with a Commodore 64.
@@ShankatsuForte spot on...the technology is in its infancy
@@ShankatsuForte No worries, you didn't pop the bubble at all. I tried the '4o', it still can't do revisions as clients and designers understand them and as they are required in a real designer job. Even with such easy tasks as black and white silhouette.
Your average consumer doesn't care about the process, only the product!
Which is why they have a generic Monet print next to their TV, why they don't know the difference between run of the mill EDM and a truly great piece of dance music. Our job as artists is to try to give the customer something of ourselves. History shows us that giving the customer what they think they want leads to just the kind of stagnation you are imagining. Yes it's easy to churn out stuff but we wouldn't be here if we weren't trying to be remembered. The fear is that the market is swamped and nobody will find us. If people just rely on the algorithm to deliver their entertainment then they deserve to see and hear only what it presents. I've been trying really hard to think of undiscovered masterpieces of the past that have been unjustly passed over because something great has obscured it. Good art has its time.
The average consumer
If you’re buying a product, you should care about the product you’re buying.
I’ll be honest. As a listener, if an AI can randomly make music that appeals to me as much as some random primadonna musician, it makes no difference to me.
As a musician, I don’t make music as a product, I do it because I like to make music. It doesn’t matter who or what else is making music.
Is this video about the person buying/listening to music or is this about the musician? If it’s about the musician, should the musician create for the product or for the process?
I feel like if you’re a musician that cares whether a listener cares more about you than what you made, you might be focusing on the wrong thing.
They are already complaining that all music sounds the same. When AI makes the music it will sound the same indefinitely.
Is this really true when AI comes into play ? This has always been true until now because there is always a general consensus that every piece of art is obviously made by some person. If Internet starts tagging what is AI and what isn’t then do you think that it is possible people will gravitate towards human made ?
"The human connection is about to become more scarce, and that's about to make it a lot more valuable." This. This. THIS! Fantastic video!
My music was already in jeopardy comparing to what real good musicians like you can do 😂 Did not stop me then, nothing to lose to that AI nonsense now haha
I keep thinking of this quote from Brian Eno. While it's about older tech, I feel its perspective is relevant to this conversation.
"The great benefit of computer sequencers is that they remove the issue of skill, and replace it with the issue of judgement. […] So the question becomes not whether you can do it or not, because any drudge can do it if they’re prepared to sit in front of the computer for a few days, the question then is, ‘Of all the things you can now do, which do you choose to do?’"
One could argue that, if you stick with it, you have an even larger chance of being able to keep at it, because others will give up.
Agreed
Just curious. Why would others giving up increase the odds that you’ll keep at it?
@@JayM928 The longer you stick with something, the more you learn the skills and attitudes required to be persistent, self-evident by the fact that you're still going. It also means you probably enjoy it enough that the process itself isn't deterring you, whereas anyone who tries it and doesn't enjoy it that much probably won't keep going for long. Just a feedback loop of motivation + compounding skill, and statistical assumptions.
AI music is soulless.
I don't need perfection, I need something made by someone who has lived and experienced pain, joy, sadness, rage...because through the experiences, we learn and then if you are a musician, you can transform your feelings into music. AI cannot replace the soul you put into your performance every time you record a new piano track.
Greetings from Germany
AI can easily create imperfect music, it is your choice, you're not constrained by perfection.
there will be algorithms to add "soul" to music, and "souless generative music" was here long before AI. Autechre is basically just algorithmic music and they've been around since the 90s.
Your perspectives on AI are among the wisest I've seen on UA-cam. I have long been concerned about AI as well. I feel completely hopeless and in despair, yet I still plod on with my music. I am afraid that AI is negatively altering society's view on the value of art and artists. I used to not care what others think, but that was before it became a possibility that others might think that my music is created by AI when I have spent a lifetime pouring my heart and soul into it. Though I feel hopeless because of AI, I nevertheless continue working on my music. I agree that cultivating more of a human connection with my audience is increasingly important. One of the reasons why I started leaving my livestreams up on my UA-cam channel (rather than taking them down immediately) is to create more of a human element with my online presence. I too just wanted to be an obscure anonymous artist hiding in the shadows putting out weird albums every few years, but I'm profoundly worried about the vanishing human connection of the digital age and I want to rebel against that. (I also somewhat rebel against the 1-dimensionality of "content culture" and sometimes get into other topics besides music.) Besides online activities, I also play live music with bands, which is also good for human connection and I have been doing that for years.
I've only made a few hundred dollars in my music career, but its been dawning on me. I've been living my dream of working on music for years now. I don't need money, fame, or recognition. But I do have to try and get my music as far as possible, there is a chance, that something I create can impact someone positively somewhere. I now understand my selfish and selfless reasons do work on music.
To anyone debating if they should continue making music, please do. For yourself, me and everyone else.
Thank you Jameson I think you nailed this one on the head!
I'm still relatively new to the musical arts, just as all of this Ai stuff is coming into play. If the music is not coming directly from my brain, I want nothing to do with it, even if it does sound better than what I can write. The entire point of my music-making journey is to express my art with sound, for better or worse. I'm not trying to "crank out beats" to make a buck.
Agreed I'd rather die in my pit of mediocracy than let something make music for me. My music may not be amazing, but I made it all.
@@Vaxter701 same. At first I felt like it's fine to use one layer you like from a generated song mixed in with your actual real stuff.. But the more that piece contributed to the sound, the less I felt like it was Even my track, despite only being 5% generated, felt 100% shameful
@@zoned7609 to me its no different to buying a midi pack using one of the midi files in it and talking about this track "I made" I'm sure some will love it and more power to them but it aint me and it never will be.
@@Vaxter701 I have one of those big midi packs and all of the hundreds of chord progressions and melodies start to sound the same after some exploring. I definitely use them as starter ideas, but not as finished music. And that's not because they're bad... it's just that I've lost the opportunity to create something of my own if I wholesale drop in a midi to my song
@@marcus_ohreallyus exctly that,I sometimes use loops from sample packs when I'm getting an idea going but they wont be there in the final track.
I said to a music budy: finally i can listen to music without needing to care about the artist, i fell in love with music, not with artists.
Thank you for this encouragement, Jameson.
I love that you’re grounded by your curiosity and by extension are enabling such philosophical views, this is what I find so fascinating about you. I get your questions and understand your fears but I don’t think Ai generated music is going to be a problem for us. I’m old enough to remember conversations of how synthesizers were going to ruin music followed by fears that samplers were going to replace the symphony orchestras but we have seen neither. I love hybrid music, synths and orchestral elements or entire sections requiring both brilliant composers and musicians to realise each piece. Ai sounds scary but in the end composers and musicians will determine which flavour of Ai music creation software will be the most popular and which will fall to the wayside just as DAW’s, samplers and synthesizers did so before it. Thanks for the discourse, I too was worried but your search for clarity made this subject easy for me to digest and I feel much better for it.
I love that take. I think sometimes we forget that art isn't about being good or bad or what it ends up being, but the joy of doing it. Music is a verb, not a noun.
someone once said, when artist voice breaks, that's what captures emotions. that is what people love. that became my philosophy. AI is sleek. but it doesn't break that way, for me, it doesn't carry that emotion that touches me.
Art and music generated by AI will always resemble the kind you find in malls, corporate lobbies, and popular online prints. AI music will thrive, even producing chart-topping hits. The masses tend to favor products made in this style, much like the items found in supermarkets, Walmart, and Target.
Don't you think people quickly will get bored by it?
A positive message. Thanks.
I totally agree that the idea of having software just crank out an entire track based on a text prompt sucks all the fun right out of the process. However, I would love to have a language model woven into Reaper, for example, to help me do the things I don’t really like doing, such as drum accompaniment, mixing, mastering or other Backing tracks that aren’t really my creative focus. This would actually allow me to hone in even more on the things I was genuinely interested in. Of course there are already tools like this in some form or another, but none with such an easy interface as natural language. That’s a feature I would actually really enjoy
Wonderful video. All the issues explained so clearly.
Your thoughts and experiences align pretty perfectly with mine. Thank you. Subscribed
I do a lot of things. As an artist I was devastated about the AI art thing. Now music takes a hit. I have learned to accept it. I'm not that worried now. I make art and music for myself. If someone else enjoys it, great. If not, who cares? I do it for me as an expression, and to heal my soul. That is all that really matters in the end, isn't it?
I think what you said about reverse democratization is true for all other areas that are affected by AI, which is, from how developments of it look like, is pretty much anything. The human connection will still be valuable, but I think it will take all of us, regardless of what you do, into niche areas.
Businesses (music or any other) as always will try to output as much as possible in the cheapest way possible, so I think it will eventually it will take away from us the luxury of being average at something. If you produce average music just for the sake of doing it, there's already a small chance of making it there and it will be significantly reduced. Hence we'll need to specialize: be being good at making live shows or whatever.
One extra piece of hope might be humans' irrationality. Sync exists there for DJs for god knows how long, but if you turn up to some underground venue and use that, it might be your last show there. So, the hunt for "the real thing" is what might save us.
So far I love udio and it’s a great source of inspiration. I think very soon I could upload my own ideas, sketches, etc and can co-write so much better than a human collaborator
Very timely discussion and great synopsis. Thanks Jameson!
The great ninja teacher in Ninja Scroll playing flute by the riverside; the Hopi shaman singing to their peoples; campfire songs around the fires of friends… I could go on
Great video as always, Jameson
Agree 100%. I compose for the pleasure of composing. Nice if others like my music, if not, tough luck. AI will never replace Human creativity and the pleasure in doing it. It only replicates predictable results. I will never go to see an AI "playing live" on a stage. Others may though.
Beautifully said, thank you for this! 🥲
Well said! Process not product, journey not 'destination'. To regard music as purely a solution to a specific brief (as in an AI prompt) is to lose sight of the depths of music (and all authentic art forms) as that which expresses something fundamental, and mysterious, about the human spirit.
love your takes
well said and presented. it actually helped me start my day on a different foot and look in a different direction. very helpful and welcome. arigato
I think you're spot-on, Jameson. This fear of AI is all-pervading at the moment but algorithm ≠ soul - as we already know from being on UA-cam(!)
Best video I've seen on the subject by far. Much love from Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Very good points and presentation...as usual 👍
Many thanks for talking about it like this 💜
Thank you for being real. Love your work.
"They had these books... that were like the internet" Way to make me feel old... 😆
Some great thoughts here. A few of my own:
- Any 'revolution' in music started with a degree of disgust (e.g. Rock & Roll, punk, synth-pop etc). What self-respecting AI system is going to put out a disgusting piece of music?
- To many folk (myself included) the best music we create is the music that comes to our sub-conscious or through happy accidents.
- Music is subjective - what is beautifully subtle to one person might be cloyingly twee to another
These thoughts reassure me, because they are wonderfully-human, and I can't imagine AI recreating that in the near future.
What I can imagine is AI replacing humans in the creation of situation music to order - and it's already happening.
Lastly, I'm not scared of AI, because as you allude later in your video, I'm one of those folk who write music for the joy of it. AI will never be able to recreate my thought processes, unless they recreate me, and then every human that exists or is about to exist. We are all unique.
That said, AI does have a place - to help us humans focus on that unique creative process. For example, I'm already using Izotope's excellent AI engines in their mixing and mastering products. And recently, I was playing around with a sequencer engine (InSession Audio's Riff Generator) which is really rather good at it - as long as me, the human, comes along at the end and tweaks it to completion...
...and therein lies the difference between someone who can push a button to churn out a piece of music that they can claim to call 'theirs' vs me, who can produce a piece of music that legitimately is 'mine'.
change your relationship with music, see music as an action and less as a product.
I know you!! Thankfully.
Even before AI, there were tens of thousands of music tracks uploaded to the internet every day, most better than anything I can currently produce. Still I get a kick out of making and publishing music myself, just as seeing the magnificent Grand Canyon was an iconic experience for me, even though millions before me also have. I saw someone painting that glorious view, and I remember thinking how cool that was, even though I was taking much more detailed and accurate photographs with my phone.
Right on. Arguably my biggest beef with AI is all the snake oil salesmen chanting that it’s going to completely change the world, and for some inane reason replace all the creative jobs (but not the mundane ones??).
But to your point, when AI is busy trying to replace the creative arts, it’s indeed missing all the happy accidents that truly makes art great.
I’d like to think I’m becoming a journeyman level in music, and almost all my productions evolve out of experimentation, leaps of faith, and indeed, accrued knowledge of how things work - in this space, and other creative spaces.
The expectation of sitting around collecting royalties without performing or teaching was a brief anomaly of the 20th century, propped up by corporate/legal fictions. People grew up thinking since they paid 20 bucks for the music on the CD, then if they grew up to make music they'd get 20 bucks forever, but that was never the value of the _music_.
Wonderful video.
Man, all my respect for your superb musicianship, more so for your generosity in putting out this insightful and intelligent message, to cheer us fellow musicians, shaken and weirded by the latest music A.I developments.
The people on top of most Tech-A.I companies seem, by the kind of things they propel, devoid of balance, humanity and real care for arts and artists, and their logic is often chilly simplistic. It´s optimization, "democratization" and "easiness" at all costs. never mind the impacts. ( The much criticized apple ipad pro commercial of the hydraulic press can´t be more literal ).
They´ve all colluded to reprogram our very psyche into adoring the artifice instead of art, rage instead of debate, otherness instead of democracy. As musicians and imperfect translators of human emotion as you beautifully said, we might have a role still in steering the wheel towards our own sanity and in the end, to societal healing even if we are just a drop in an ocean of noise.
Love your videos good sir
30 years playing now in crying its over for us next hot bands well robots with always hit songs they play.
Great vid. I needed to hear a good point of view 🤘😎
AI has a much easier time sounding like Beethoven than sounding like me…
Great video.
Very good thoughts - and I know I experience a lot of what you're talking about already. For example, I absolutely love listening to Hainbach's music when I know the processes he uses to make it - but other similar dark ambient/avant garde sounds are far less engaging to me if they pop up in a recommended list. It's the fact that Hainbach's passion was clear from his process, it helped me to explore the things he is looking at, and adds that human element you're speaking about.
Now, I do hope there won't be a need to ground any music we make in some sort of video or similar that communicates our humanness, but as video grows every more prevalent, I do wonder just how many people will listen to music for the sake of listening to music. I know I do far less often than I used to, and frankly than I would like.
The hard thing to process well is that in addition to AI making music-as-a-commodity extremely easy to get (or will soon be), we are experiencing more of our music as a commodity - backdrops for video/other media, generic clips to get viral on social media shorts, etc. I do think there'll always be people who listen to music for the sake of music - and they especially will seek out that which is created with craft, intention, and artistry. Part of me wonders whether that is a growing or shrinking group per capita. It might grow as we hear more and more generic music fill in, or it might shrink as the general population is just too saturated on music and don't desire to seek out more since they hear so much so readily, regardless of its quaility. Or maybe that is all over-blown on my part and not a huge amount will change, outside the music-related job opportunities for people to pop out jingles for ads and the latest Tik Tok viral video.
But I stick with your conclusion: continue to create music - and to be very intentional of your process, intentionality, and artistry. And be open to find ways of how we can communicate that with our potential audience.
Great video!
Very glad to find your channel today. I'm not a fan of artificial anything, but what can be done?!
I got started in the early 90's, then life came along with so many interruptions and I stopped creating.
Coming back into it, everything is so different. Back in the early days there were surges of experimental music, you could even say the genre had a pulse. And this pulse fueled further experimentation. It was a wonderful time to be an artist.
Thanks for sharing your perspective and in a non "doom and gloom" way.
Cheers.
great , great , great video
I love listening to music, even more discovering the person behind the music, just like I discovered your music and then your channel and your personality. Music regurgigated from a machine might sound good but remains uninspiring.
Inspirational video as always Jameson! Just watching you play just makes me want leave the office straight to my studio playing around and going into that rabbit hole.
P.S. what's the name of the track playing behind the chapter named The "Democratization" Myth? around 2:54? I went through almost all your tracks on Spotify and can't seem to find it :P (but discovering more tracks which I'm liking in the process XD)
Hi interesting and thanks. You are an artist for sure. You are looking to me as always seeking the graal in your artistic expression. I ve been playing music for near 60 years now and crossed all these feelings since an era where even personal computers did not exist. So democratization was great to me but has to be kept as a mean.
Electronic & computer gear that I own is a trap, flashing so intense light that masking the unaccessible star of the music expression that will make me happy. In general, music is an illusion, except for dancing or soldiers parades, and so frustrating form of artistic expression because of the ephemeric aspect of it.
One drone note played on this or that machine, or being able to play a good guitar bass line in a band or playing (when not so badly!) Chopin ballade in F minor are unique value: vibrations from mind to guts and return. The satisfaction of achievement is a different thing, and comes from the effort to get it from my piano, my guitar or finding the right piece of elc gear, same.
From any kind of musical or artistic expression, any including AI, making music is an artificial world of happiness, but it is a real world of organismic pleasure. So I discovered that the way to find that vibration must be my goal, my reality; looking for a musical result is my illusion. "What if my dreams never come true ?" That is a fact and I have to look elsewhere.
I always try to get in mind the definition of artistic expression which is to create disorder by art that helps the human being to survive to the pressure of order. Including business rules of musical gear manufacturers or AI standardisation.
That is why by definition AI, component of this new order will never produce an artistic performance which is the proper of Human
AI is making music, possibly successful in music business and will be part of our culture, or our fashion.
another great video
Thanks!
What a wonderful piece of music do you have there at the beginning! I'd love to hear some more... is there a full version?
Thank you! You can watch the whole thing here: ua-cam.com/video/8vnOFEci0CA/v-deo.html :)
dang - today's my lucky day, this video was something I am wondering for quite some time!
If someone is putting out music where they used an AI to copy and publish an exact copy of your work, then they have violated copyright law. Otherwise, as you say, the AI is just learning as we do.
What is derivative? Do you really want to go down the same silly path of artists trying to copyright guitar chords that we've seen pop up over the last few years.
I'm a photographer, and my photos are a mixture of myself and the hundreds of thousands of other photographer's photos that I have looked at over the decades. There is no way to separate my photos from my influences.
I always view your videos twice; 1 for the vocals, 2 for the incredible soundtrack. Thank you for what you do! P.S. The piano piece that is in this video, does it have a title/place I can purchase it?
completely agree
My music is real and always will be.
The ultimate goal of corporations is to maximise profit and reduce workforce, unfortunately. But I'm hopeful since these technologies are basically unable of incremental creation based on human feedback. It's mostly one-off tools, be it in music or software engineering (my domain). There will always be jobs for real musicians, real sofware engineers, in my opinion.
Call me a grumpy old man. I don't care, I've been called much worse. I remember when Punk came along, looked at Fleetwood Mac, Foreigner, the second version of Journey, etc. and said, "Hey, I can do that". That didn't take anything away from those audiences, it added a new one. I sense that AI in music will be appealing to some, but not all. Maybe TV, Movie, and Record Labels (do they still exist?) looking for a quick and cheap product to apply to their current project will go nuts over it. People who want to enjoy the journey of the artist, the magic of evoking emotions, expressing emotions, these folks will always side with the human artist. My $0.02 belief. Also, Frank Zappa said decades ago: "the present day composer refuses to die".
I think the problem with AI isn't necessarily how easy it is to make because there are a metric ton of people like myself who only want to listen to music made by humans, the problem for me is the better it gets the harder it will be to tell what was made by people or an AI. Like with visual art you're always gonna be trying to work out what's what and in most cases you're not really going to know unless the person goes out of their way to make it clear they do or don't use AI. People can go on about how humans have a certain soul the AI lacks but when it actually comes to spotting the difference between the two, even if most of the time you can tell, is still often indistinguishable and it's just gonna get better and better.
Thank you for not including AI in the title of this video because I would most likely have skipped and I have found it very triggering (in a good way).
Music technology from the very beginning; sticks and stones and hollow bone flutes, the next new invention has challenged and stretched the "musicians" who came before (eg keyed flutes and clarinets). Just as the arrival of photography did not kill the painted portrait and recording did not end our appetite for live music, in my long lifetime, the arrival of the drum machine in the late 70s created an hysterical furore about loss of work, when at the same time video and the use of pre recorded backing in supposedly "live" performance ( the so called P.A.) were much more disruptive to the work of live musicians.
As a visual artist as well as a sometime composer/songwriter, the shocking emergence of AI at first appears troubling but the closer we look and listen to what is produced by it the easier it is to understand that key values such as you describe are most often missing and one quickly discerns the work that has been subjected to the creative imagination that drives all art and the critical framework that refines it.
Of course, I have the luxury of not relying on my art for an income any more, so I am insulated from the immediate concerns most of your professional viewers will share but I truly believe that although it will be disruptive, artists will emerge/are emerging from the confusion to demonstrate that AI requires an inventive mind in order to produce something profound.
Perhaps what we fear is that the trajectory we are seeing leads towards the artificially creative mind? Well knowledge is not art. Knowledge and technology can facilitate art but those things are what drives the creation of new art media not the imagination which exploits them.
The printing press, the camera and indeed the drum machine have all inspired new art forms. So has AI. Its success is already apparent and the proliferation of dros equally so. Will it make the bone flute obsolete after 50,000 years? Probably not.
AI can’t stop you from having fun! Only you can can 😊
The consumption of music was already democratized....and that's all this is. Creating has also been democratized to an extent, but will always require individual skill, and AI "generated" music will always be necessarily derivative and in the absence of a pool of continued human creativity; self-referential. I have no interest in music NOT created by a living being, and many (many) people feel the same way. That's not to say that I reject generative music or even AI tools in the hands of a musician; but that's the point....it need be in the hands of a musician, for that's where true creativity (and emotion) lies. Your generous and insightful videos are a great example of the real, tangible, genuine and human sharing and connection I am, and always will be, looking for. AI, like any other tool, can be misused. Tools ought to serve us, as individuals and as a species, for our ends. We are ultimately not served (even if the "powers that be" think, in a shortsighted way, that they are) by an AI that displaces artists. What a cold, emotionless and yet cacophonous world that would be.....with the echoes of emotion and creativity all around us, but intangibly "hidden," just beyond our grasp as we catch glimpses of those ghosts of true creativity that slowly fade as the *machine* devolves further and further into that self-referential malaise. I believe there is an "other side" to "get to" in this most interesting of eras...and that side does once again embrace human creativity. In the meantime, we should all keep creating, improving, and most importantly enjoying the journey. Thanks JNJ, for all you contribute.
Very interesting sight. (weirdly enough even for live musicians, the struggle is stronger and stronger). In the end it's summed up by 2 questions: 1) Can musicians live from their own music. 2) Why do we make music.
Just subscribed, what was that you’re doing with the cassette tape
Thank you! I completely agree. This is exactly what I've been telling people for the past year+ ... I couldn't care less about a piece of music generated by a bot, no matter how "good" it is. I want the human story behind the music, and AI will never touch that... until the androids start to dream of electric sheep, of course.
❤
Great video, Nathan. One perspective often discussed is the notion that AIs are inspired just as humans are. This comparison would hold if every human could access, recall, and modify every piece of music ever created. It's akin to expecting humans to match AIs in chess prowess. It's simply not a reasonable comparison. Cheers, Troels
Wait, you are not an AI !?
Great video, very much needed. This AI thing is just too crazy with misinformation. I genuinely thought we would use it as a tool to learn from. My Britannica never gets old btw!
💯👍
forward never back
If you thought you could not have done;
Nor have done what they thought you could have,
Then why do you think you did what you didn’t do;
When they said that you would not do it?
Is it because what you are doing now,
Could be what you would have done,
If they had not thought that you couldn’t do it,
Once you finally do what you always knew, couldn't be done?
Yeah I agree… I think it will ultimately reinforce that what we’re really looking for is a human connection. Might take a while before we get there tho.
As a purely hobbyist music maker I’ve the benefit of never producing products, I make my music and four or five other people will ever hear it and it has achieved its purpose by being created. AI and most other musicians will always be “better” than me but AI and those better musicians even given the same starting point will never make the things I do. For music professionals the world looks scary right now but remember, the phonograph destroyed the sort of jobs musicians got before it’s existence but musicians wound up with opportunities that were literally unimaginable before that, the same cycle happened with radio, internet, home production, ect. Keep honing your craft, there will be ways to make it into money that will blow your mind when they are discovered. That is just the sort of creature humans are.
I agree that the doom and gloom is useless. I'm disappointed to see comment sections and artist forums filled largely with sadness, cynicism and apathy. We should be angry. Furious. Companies cannot be allowed to use our copyrighted work in this way, especially for profit. The artists and rightsholders who have the resources to fight this in court are doing nothing. There has to be some way for us to fight back. Speaking out against this theft is the first step. I'm glad that you brought up the topic of training data because most people discussing this are not.
Excellently put.
I agree with some things. Listening to someone playing an instrument in the same room will be more valuable. Probably mainly smaller concerts. Stadium concerts are already often close to karaoke. But I think you and many others underestimate what ai will be able to do. It will create “new” music at least as well as humans. And no one will know if something they listen to is made by ai. A lot of “songwriters” will claim that something isn’t ai when it is. To see a silver lining in this situation seems forced to me. This is a catastrophe for most professional songwriters and composers who has spent years and decades to learn a craft. Your channel, which I enjoy very much, will be fine, though, because it’s about the process, and thoughts about making music.
I will add: have you guys seen the videos where AI is playing hide and seek? It breaks the game, thinking outside of the box. The creators were surprised. Ai will be able to create very original music, and even new genres of music.
6:19 strong ambience of dread
I think that ultimately we’re going to see the rise of corporate music, the new musak that corporations will use so they don’t have to pay musicians to write their jingles or compose their old music. I also see personalized streaming services that will just make pleasant offensive background noise that some people will enjoy.
Then, on the other side, I see music, real music made by real people, has becoming something different. Becoming more important as the opposite to all of that bullshit. I see a patronage model emerging where people support their artists directly and separate streaming services forming that are more artist centered than the Spotify and Apple Music. There will also be things in between. Things have their place, but it’s going to be very difficult for creators who depend on their music to make a living to continue to do so. For many, this will just not be possible.
I just love it how all these AI companies always dodge the question "what was this trained on?". I wonder why...
PS: those three little notes you played at 1:33 were lovely.
Perhaps we should ask every musician what music they were trained on and have them pay royalties as if everything they make is a remix?
Lemme know when AI can write a tune like Tipper… I’ll be waiting with baited breath.
My standard answer related to AI is this - it will suck even more money out of the commercial side of all art, which is bad. But it can never kill art because art is about human connection and that is in our biology. That’s inescapable. Process will become more critical. Love performance (in person or on line). This is already true on social media in some ways. People want to see how it’s made. And connect with something real. Live music might become even more important as people seek this out. We want stories about artists too. That’s something we have that AI doesnt. Our story that only we can tell. Again, biology demands this. we cannot leave our biology behind in this new era of AI. It will remain. The money may not but the music will.
I wrote this and then finished the video and was like - oh yeah! Same page. Nice!
There will also be AI tools that musicians/composers can use. I have personally never heard anything good made by AI. I'm sure it is possible tho, at least eventually. AI music might be very bad for some music creators, but in general it will offer new opportunities as well. It will also change music in positive ways. There is no opportunrity but to embrace it somehow, because it seems unavoidable.
AI won’t hinder the highly skilled much. It very well could hinder those starting out. It has a chilling effect upon new artists to develop their craft to the point where they can put themselves out. If AI is putting out music better than those learning the craft, it deters them from pursuing the craft. It seems pointless because it would take time to beat the machine.
There are skills that can’t easily be replicated or synthesized. Every artist needs to get practical skills to supplement those musical skills to make a living.
I think maybe one day we will have to wall off the original internet, and start again. It was a good first try.
Actually I think the real point is: In history there has ALWAYS been a person, organization, orchestra, technology, whathaveyou which is BETTER than I could ever be. This would not stop me from making music. My very personal opinion is that AI is some form of hysterics right now, it's new so it's fancy but it will very soon get boring. We will of course see a No. 1 hit in the charts completely made by an AI. And this is good for the folks who as of now are using music just for some kind of background noise and are not listening to this beautiful art. But there will always be people out there who enjoys hand made music. That's by the way the reason why vinyl is growing again.
AI will not vanish and it will be a powerful tool in the hands of skilled musicians. But used by nerds or wanna-bes ... no ... it's just a side note in history.
A very timely topic for discussion. Just as photography didn't kill painting, player pianos didn't kill pianists, and cassette tapes didn't kill recording albums, any new technology will upset the apple cart for a while and then people will go on to the next shiny thing. What AI can do, as you pointed out, is to make people more interested in art created by real people, as AI art of any kind is derivative by it's very nature. I see another period in art like we saw in the fin de siecle period, which spawned all kinds of new visual and sound arts (think Picasso, Dadaism, Luigi Russolo and his intonarumori, etc.). I think the next couple of decades will be very interesting.
I would like to believe you are right but there are an awful lot of people just listening to whatever they get from some "lo-fi beats to study to" algorithm based playlist on Spotify. It doesn't matter how good or how authentic that stuff is since it is just musical wallpaper.
@@startrekmike People listen to what some people choose, I'm a music business graduate and if the directives want to ban AI music they can, they can literally block any way of making AI music monetizable or even popular. One law and it's all over.
@@BLACKLABEL405That would be great & why not? I seem to remember having to "show your work" to my teachers in school. Something like: Is this your music?... OK, PROVE it" 😎
No one can't replace entities with souls
...until they can
Human-made music is like an original painting by a famous artist, full of unique emotion and creativity. AI music, though impressive, is more like a high-quality print: technically excellent but missing that personal touch.
7:10 "it's not creating anything, it's combining things" is actually very incorrect. It's genuinely synthesizing new things based on criteria it understands.
If you've seen it reproduce real images perfectly, you'll find that someone used a highly focused set of data that excluded everything else other than the image it was extensively trained on
That model wouldn't be able to produce anything else, except abbetations of that image.
That isn't to say it's not still remembering copyrighted things as it synthesizes, but that's like saying someone who tried to mimic van gogh is performing plagiarism Rather than just calling it inspiration.
In truth what it does is learn to replicate a style, it does not collage.
That being said I stopped generating things with AI a while ago, not because I'm against the idea, but because I'm against the full on cynical capitalist cash grab that's followed it, salivating at a chance to finally run with it when they think it's good enough to make money.
I still think it's a great technology, but once again ruined by humanity and it's shortsightedness
Spot on, great take on IA and the democratisation of music!
What do you mean by democratization of music
I haven't thought of the future of AI that way, but you are right. People will be looking for art made by humans and ways to verify that it is, in fact, made by humans. So people who make it live or in videos will probably be more popular, until AI becomes good at faking those too, which won't be that far, now that I think about it... But the point is that there will still be a place for art. The only thing that will become very hard is starting new when you are nobody, which has never been easy I guess, but with the noise generated at blazing speed by AI it will become even worse.