Team Yankee Battle Report, March Formation T-80s against Bradley Formation #15

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 24

  • @DeadpoolNJ
    @DeadpoolNJ 2 роки тому +1

    Nice more team Yankee, thank you. I just started assembling my first set.

  • @nottinghamwargames5555
    @nottinghamwargames5555 3 роки тому

    Great report. Thanks for posting. Very entertaining.

  • @joestiller4270
    @joestiller4270 3 роки тому +2

    At last TY RETURNS

  • @Executioner9000
    @Executioner9000 3 роки тому +3

    Nice to see TY back, although I'm pretty sure the Shock Infantry for the soviets comes with the better RPGs by default.

    • @BlitzMinis
      @BlitzMinis  3 роки тому +1

      you know what.... youre right lol. This is what you get when you have a czech commander in charge of a soviet elite force.

  • @philiphale2785
    @philiphale2785 3 роки тому

    I enjoyed that, great to see some TY back on the channel. All the best.

  • @enolas2147
    @enolas2147 3 роки тому

    Nice to see team Yankee back….tank you 😉😉

  • @enolas2147
    @enolas2147 3 роки тому

    More,more battle report please..tank you

  • @Paul_Beach
    @Paul_Beach 3 роки тому

    Thanks for another great TY report. A word of advice: With a range of 64" !!! keep the Storms well back. They don't need to go up the middle.

    • @BlitzMinis
      @BlitzMinis  3 роки тому

      dude there was nowhere to hide lol

  • @memorarenz
    @memorarenz 3 роки тому +1

    Good to see some Yankee

    • @BlitzMinis
      @BlitzMinis  3 роки тому +1

      It has been some time thats true, I am building a West German force so hopefully more soon!

  • @MrElliptific
    @MrElliptific 2 роки тому

    ah, we missed you! Some of the best reports. Please do also FoW (Bulge?)

    • @BlitzMinis
      @BlitzMinis  2 роки тому

      I kind of suck bad at FOW but I'll consider it!

  • @GhostMaker00
    @GhostMaker00 3 роки тому

    How Many points,sorry didn't hear. I assume 100pts? Thanks for the video love this, want some Flames of war and song of ice & fire. Thanks for all the work.

    • @Moonova
      @Moonova 3 роки тому

      They said 120 at the 9ish min mark. I pointed the Soviets at 122 though. Not sure if it is the spigot in the afghansty plt. Or if I put in something extra that I can't see.

    • @BlitzMinis
      @BlitzMinis  3 роки тому

      @@Moonova weird, I just checked the list on forces and it is 120. The recon platoon is support yeah. afghansty is 14 points as its medium aat 10 points and 1 spigot for 2 pts and RPG 7VR for another 2 giving it a total of 14 points

  • @abram4806
    @abram4806 3 роки тому +1

    For the team yankee stater set m1 vs t80u’s. How long would you think a no skilled builder making this take to build all together ? Lol

    • @BlitzMinis
      @BlitzMinis  3 роки тому +2

      you mean assembling the M1s and T-80s? I think it can be done quite quick. myabe 20-30 minutes for the first tank and then 10 minutes each after that.

    • @abram4806
      @abram4806 3 роки тому

      @@BlitzMinis alright how about if the vehicles like the m60 t-64 bmp Bradley lol

    • @kmriifps
      @kmriifps Рік тому

      @@abram4806t64 sideskirts are finnicky but bmp are super easy to build and m60 has a lot of parts but they go together easily. T72B i found easiest to build, along with bmp3/2/1 (they are all relatively low part and fit together well)

  • @rickybell2190
    @rickybell2190 2 роки тому

    90 minute video and the tanks, vehicles never moved. Combat was all about who could role the better dice. Tactics ....there was none. Vehicles shoulder to shoulder, it never happened even when they are parked up in a military base they had bigger gaps unlike this in where they are in combat. Go and dig out some old rules and I swear you'll have a much more historical, accurate game.

    • @BlitzMinis
      @BlitzMinis  2 роки тому +1

      I really wouldn't do Team Yankee for historical simulation. though you might try battlegroup nortag, i think they are prolly closer. TY has a fair amount of abstraction