His Aikido is pretty good...we do most of these same moves. It was swift and smooth enough to question whether he was leading out or pivoting out on the kote-geishis
Aikido is a lot more softer form on art. It is more circular where as aiki is harder more direct more rigid to an extent although both styles are considered a soft martial arts make no mistake about it there's nothing soft about either of the two arts they both originate or have roots from the same place. Also most not all but most akido styles get into a philosophy of being in harmony with ones attacker and not causing harm to there enemies where aiki looks to destroy there enemies.
This is more to the point than Daito Ryu Aiki is today. Nowadays, it’s as formalized as Aikkikai Aikido. Plus, there are several practical techniques here (Shomen Ate) that are taught in Tomiki Aikido, that are never taught in Aiki-kai. It’s kinda sad.
It's called "soft" because you don't use "hard" muscle force. Instead, you use a unified, coordinated full-body power that draws on receiving and feeding force to and from the ground, through yourself... and then through uke. It feels "soft" because when they touch your body, they can't feel any resistance, no muscle flexation. They feel a relaxed, soft, unflexed body. But beneath it, there is a feel like iron or a wall of rock. That is from the special structure that comes from training of the internal tissues and alignment of joints combined to receive and to feed force.
+John Hardin 'I was the Director of General Affairs at the Kobukan, beginning around 1942, and I helped out Ueshiba Sensei in daily matters. ‘Aikido,’ rather than being a specifically selected name, was the term used to refer to “Butokukai-ryu” Aiki Budo within the Nihon Butokukai. …The Butokukai was an independent umbrella organization for the martial arts and it also was in charge of martial arts in the police departments. It was very difficult to create a new section in the Butokukai at that time. Mr. Hisatomi [of the Kodokan] proposed the establishment of a new section, including arts for actual fighting based on jujutsu techniques…. There was discussion within the Butokukai about the choice of name for this new section….Mr. Hisatomi argued for his proposal energetically, and explained that ‘aikido’ would be better name than Aiki Budo for this new section, because it would be better stress the idea of ‘michi’ or Way….In the end, no one opposed this proposal. ”- - - Minoru Hirai Shihan, Aikido Pioneers - Prewar Era, pp. 260-1' As you can read in the excerpt, the name Aikido was not chosen by Ueshiba sensei as opposed to general belief amongst many aikidoka. Aikido as it is trained nowadays in the vast majority of the dojo around the world uses the pedagogical frame that was established by Kisshomaru Doshu. Yoseikan founder Mochizuki MInoru was trained in the early 30's and was taught the old aikijujutsu techniques. Although the essence of the art is always the same, it is fair to say that the pedagogical frame of aikijujutsu is more biased towards self protection first while in aikido self perfection (michi) is the main goal. Aiki is aiki, whether one traines aikido or aikijujutsu. Historical evidence (film and photo) clearly shows that there is not a big difference in the way Ueshiba sensei performed his techniques, inclusive atemi. The truth is out there, you just have to search for it with an open mind! (A good place to start is 'Aikido Journal') It is difficult to explain all this with limited text and things aren't black and white, so please, if you want to know the history of Aikido...read the Aikido Journal interviews and articles. kind regards,Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
+HECTOR ARTURO well, to say aiki jujutsu is the ancestor of aikido, is simply correct I would say, not in general terms. If this is a later derivation after aikido, then it should really not be called aiki jujutsu really? it would not actually be aiki jujutsu. Aikido is a modern art, so anything derived or created after it, must be extremely young ... when was this form created? aikido was developed, fully into what it is, around 1930 right? .. when you say it was born after aikido, are you saying "from" aikido? I don't think many people are not familiar with aiki jujutsu, sure if you mention jujutsu, people now immediately think of brazilian jujutsu or gracie jujutsu.
+Daniel Murray 'I was the Director of General Affairs at the Kobukan, beginning around 1942, and I helped out Ueshiba Sensei in daily matters. ‘Aikido,’ rather than being a specifically selected name, was the term used to refer to “Butokukai-ryu” Aiki Budo within the Nihon Butokukai. …The Butokukai was an independent, umbrella organization for the martial arts, and it also was in charge of martial arts in the police departments. It was very difficult to create a new section in the Butokukai at that time. Mr. Hisatomi [of the Kodokan] proposed the establishment of a new section, including arts for actual fighting based on jujutsu techniques…. There was discussion within the Butokukai about the choice of name for this new section….Mr. Hisatomi argued for his proposal energetically, and explained that ‘aikido’ would be better name than Aiki Budo for this new section, because it would be better to stress the idea of ‘michi’ or Way….In the end, no one opposed this proposal. ”- - - Minoru Hirai Shihan, Aikido Pioneers - Prewar Era, pp. 260-1' As you can read in the excerpt, the name Aikido was not chosen by Ueshiba sensei as opposed to general belief amongst many aikidoka. Aikido as it is trained nowadays in the vast majority of the dojo around the world uses the pedagogical frame that was established by Kisshomaru Doshu. Yoseikan founder Mochizuki MInoru was trained in the early 30's and was taught the old aikijujutsu techniques. Although the essence of the art is always the same, it is fair to say that the pedagogical frame of aikijujutsu is more biased towards self protection first while in aikido self perfection (michi) is the main goal. Aiki is aiki, whether one traines aikido or aikijujutsu. Historical evidence (film and photo) clearly shows that there is not a big difference in the way Ueshiba sensei performed his techniques, inclusive atemi. The truth is out there, you just have to search for it with an open mind! (A good place to start is 'Aikido Journal') It is difficult to explain all this with limited text and things aren't black and white, so please, if you want to know the history of Aikido...read the Aikido Journal interviews and articles. kind regards,Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
+HECTOR ARTURO 'I was the Director of General Affairs at the Kobukan, beginning around 1942, and I helped out Ueshiba Sensei in daily matters. ‘Aikido,’ rather than being a specifically selected name, was the term used to refer to “Butokukai-ryu” Aiki Budo within the Nihon Butokukai. …The Butokukai was an independent, umbrella organization for the martial arts, and it also was in charge of martial arts in the police departments. It was very difficult to create a new section in the Butokukai at that time. Mr. Hisatomi [of the Kodokan] proposed the establishment of a new section, including arts for actual fighting based on jujutsu techniques…. There was discussion within the Butokukai about the choice of name for this new section….Mr. Hisatomi argued for his proposal energetically, and explained that ‘aikido’ would be better name than Aiki Budo for this new section, because it would be better to stress the idea of ‘michi’ or Way….In the end, no one opposed this proposal. ”- - - Minoru Hirai Shihan, Aikido Pioneers - Prewar Era, pp. 260-1' As you can read in the excerpt, the name Aikido was not chosen by Ueshiba sensei as opposed to general belief amongst many aikidoka. Aikido as it is trained nowadays in the vast majority of the dojo around the world uses the pedagogical frame that was established by Kisshomaru Doshu. Yoseikan founder Mochizuki MInoru was trained in the early 30's and was taught the old aikijujutsu techniques. Although the essence of the art is always the same, it is fair to say that the pedagogical frame of aikijujutsu is more biased towards self protection first while in aikido self perfection (michi) is the main goal. Aiki is aiki, whether one traines aikido or aikijujutsu. Historical evidence (film and photo) clearly shows that there is not a big difference in the way Ueshiba sensei performed his techniques, inclusive atemi. The truth is out there, you just have to search for it with an open mind! (A good place to start is 'Aikido Journal') It is difficult to explain all this with limited text and things aren't black and white, so please, if you want to know the history of Aikido...read the Aikido Journal interviews and articles. kind regards,Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
That was excellent. I am not familiar with Yoseikan. Is it related to Daito-ryu aikijujustu? I used to do Yoshinkan Aikido and see many similarities in techniques.
Mochizuki (founder of the Yoseikan) was trained by Ueshiba at the very start of the 30's while he still taught Daito ryu. Mochizuki even met Takeda Sokaku once. Shioda was trained a few years later, also in Daito ryu. Evidently many similarities occur. Kind regards, Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
Chauveau sensei, I loved the video. Can you comment on Kenji Tomiki? Did you meet or train with him? We know we was an established judoka under Kano sensei before studying with Ueshiba sensei. As Ueshiba's earliest dedicated senior student (I believe, before Shioda sensei), did Tomiki also study Daito ryu and aikijutsu? I would think so, but I haven't heard discussion of this.
Thank you for your kind words. Since Tomiki sensei passed away in december '79, I never met nor trained under him. He was indeed 6 years Shioda sensei's senior, Tomiki first trained under Ueshiba in the summer of '26 and Shioda sensei entered the Kobukan dojo in '32. Both were trained in Daito ryu aikijujutsu. Kind regards, Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
Yoseikan teaches the Aikido that existed before the war and before Ueshiba changed the techniques to make them softer, more peaceful and more of an exercise. His student, Mochizuki didn't like the changes and believed that budo should be for defence first and started his own school. That's not to say that a true expert of that newer art can't be a formidable enemy.
There is a super interesting chapter on mochizuki in prewar masters by s Pranin. If I remember correctly he was also taught judo by the founder of judo. Did he have a school in Tennessee or somewhere like that?
Hi, I'm looking at taking this up as a compliment to my kung fu training and would like to ask some questions. What happens if you apply these techniques to a person who is not used to receiving them or falling and rolling? Would you break their arm or leg? Does this art teach a follow up to techniques which do not go as expected?
+staminapromos Indeed, if applied to a non initiated one would break or dislocate joints; since aiki based martial arts strive to apply a technique that suits one's position, situation and distance, follow up techniques are part of our curriculum. kind regards, Hugo Chauveau Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
Why only we see demonstrations but no real fighting on tandoori of aikijujutsu and aikido I want to see this more real to believe in the techniques and this needs some kicks and punches in real time to motivate the people to like as a way to defeat
Eduardo Leal: most of the traditional martial tehniques are designed to teach you body mechanics. I don't want to sound like those guys ''they are deadly'' but you can get injured (I did, several times) if you do it for real. I used to spar with a friend and more than once he passed out (I passed out too). Last time he felt bad for 1 week after a throw. You can injure your head or your neck. When you demonstrate it's easy to take the fall because you know what tehnique will be done on you, but during a sparing (which most of the time ends in a full contact fight when you are a beginner) you risk a lot doing some of the tehniques because you don't know what your partener is trying on you. In Aikijujutsu and Aikido we don't use JUDO tatami (which are better for throws) but some Karate hard fashioned tatami. Taking uncontroled falls on those will make you feel all your insides or pass out :)))))
Those are the sutemis Minoru Mochizuki incorporated into his art and which he got from one of the first jujitsu systems he learned as a teenager. Really, there like 50 variations on that theme. Personally, I think there's too much of it in Yoseikan.
Looks good and in contrary to Aikido, I understand the mechanics of the techniques, also the tai-sabaki, today’s Aikido is total nonsens, and isn’t a martial art anymore but a health and body system based on Aiki Jitsu, this is still the real thing osu guy’s 👊
Когда читаю: "Айки-дзюцу" - всегда открываю видео с надеждой увидеть "айки", но к сожалению очередное видео ограничивается только "дзюцу". Зачем называть школу так, чтобы потом не уметь продемонстрировать этот самый принцип "айки"? Назовите "Дзю-дзюцу" - это будет честно. Истины ради - основателем школы "Ёсейкан" является Минору Мотидзуки и и авторское название, которое он дал своему направлению "Ёсейкан Будо".
This guys budo is ace. But Aiki arts really need yo start adopting new strikes into the training. All we are learning is the art. No-one strikes the way we do in training. we are learning nothing useless outside of the principles.
Primo, knife defenses are considered higher level techniques. We refrain from showing these because people might get the wrong impression of 'easy technique' and copy the forms without proper training. Secundo, the aim of our videos is to build bridges between all aiki schools, not to show off. Kind regards, Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
nykout 'I was the Director of General Affairs at the Kobukan, beginning around 1942, and I helped out Ueshiba Sensei in daily matters. ‘Aikido,’ rather than being a specifically selected name, was the term used to refer to “Butokukai-ryu” Aiki Budo within the Nihon Butokukai. …The Butokukai was an independent, umbrella organization for the martial arts, and it also was in charge of martial arts in the police departments. It was very difficult to create a new section in the Butokukai at that time. Mr. Hisatomi [of the Kodokan] proposed the establishment of a new section, including arts for actual fighting based on jujutsu techniques…. There was discussion within the Butokukai about the choice of name for this new section….Mr. Hisatomi argued for his proposal energetically, and explained that ‘aikido’ would be better name than Aiki Budo for this new section, because it would be better to stress the idea of ‘michi’ or Way….In the end, no one opposed this proposal. ”- - - Minoru Hirai Shihan, Aikido Pioneers - Prewar Era, pp. 260-1' As you can read in the excerpt, the name Aikido was not chosen by Ueshiba sensei as opposed to general belief amongst many aikidoka. Aikido as it is trained nowadays in the vast majority of the dojo around the world uses the pedagogical frame that was established by Kisshomaru Doshu. Yoseikan founder Mochizuki MInoru was trained in the early 30's and was taught the old aikijujutsu techniques. Although the essence of the art is always the same, it is fair to say that the pedagogical frame of aikijujutsu is more biased towards self protection first while in aikido self perfection (michi) is the main goal. Aiki is aiki, whether one traines aikido or aikijujutsu. Historical evidence (film and photo) clearly shows that there is not a big difference in the way Ueshiba sensei performed his techniques, inclusive atemi. The truth is out there, you just have to search for it with an open mind! (A good place to start is 'Aikido Journal') It is difficult to explain all this with limited text and things aren't black and white, so please, if you want to know the history of Aikido...read the Aikido Journal interviews and articles. kind regards,Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
I wouldn't count on this working in a street fight. No disrespect but the way those "attacks" are made is just to make the "defender" look good with those moves. There was no resistance at all.
why don't you just use a gun instead. Martial arts exist for a reason. Not only can it improve physical stamina and flexibility. But there's also that BUDO spirit. And never blame any kind of martial for it to "not work." It's the person. More importantly, if you were a true professional martial artist, first lesson is to remove yourself from the threat. Your words give me the sense that you like to go force with force, which you can, hence the gun fits you more, no martial art can help you.
@Vui Programmer yeah mate.I don't need a martial arts history lesson and you aren't going to tell me anything i haven't already heard 1000 times before. Everybody with any real martial arts or boxing training knows that aikido is a joke. If you want to believe in the mystic arts then good luck to you.
![DAITO-RYU AIKI-JUJUTSU [4K 60fps] - 47th Traditional Japanese Martial Arts Demonstration](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7b_2XuW_2Ew/mqdefault.jpg)
Impressive demonstration. Good posture, aiki flow, spirit and interesting variety of techniques.
Please check Aikido Journal's homepage and look for the interview with Minoru Hiai.
Kind regards, Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
His Aikido is pretty good...we do most of these same moves. It was swift and smooth enough to question whether he was leading out or pivoting out on the kote-geishis
Aikido comes from this.
very nice techniques. I always admire Yoseikan Budo and master Mochizuki Minoru. Mr. Chaveau did very well
El Aki jujutsu es y será una de las artes marciales más completa por eso es mi preferida gracias.
Excellent demonstration. Thanks :-)
I've used the Greco version of some of these moves in MMA/Pancrase training. The moves are similar but uke is usually pretty unwilling!
Very nice demostration, i actually am an aikido practicioner, but its nice to see where it all came from. Very nice.
Maybe you should move on to aiki jujutsu once you get your 3rd Dan in Aiki Jujutsu
This is a great demonstration. Bravo to this video. Good Kiai and good technique.
Very good demontration👍🤩
Aikido is a lot more softer form on art. It is more circular where as aiki is harder more direct more rigid to an extent although both styles are considered a soft martial arts make no mistake about it there's nothing soft about either of the two arts they both originate or have roots from the same place. Also most not all but most akido styles get into a philosophy of being in harmony with ones attacker and not causing harm to there enemies where aiki looks to destroy there enemies.
beautiful techniques...OSU to you Sensei. #yoshinkanaikido
Maravilloso! És la ténica más completa que yo he conocido, en todas las artes marciales.
Ederval Salvagnani Júnior - Brasil
excellent! You are really good!
This is more to the point than Daito Ryu Aiki is today. Nowadays, it’s as formalized as Aikkikai Aikido. Plus, there are several practical techniques here (Shomen Ate) that are taught in Tomiki Aikido, that are never taught in Aiki-kai. It’s kinda sad.
very good work. congratulations !
i do like this video very helpful thanx
Very enjoyable. Thank you.
Excellente vidéo !
It is called 'ude kansetsu gatame'.
Kind regards, Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
It's called "soft" because you don't use "hard" muscle force. Instead, you use a unified, coordinated full-body power that draws on receiving and feeding force to and from the ground, through yourself... and then through uke. It feels "soft" because when they touch your body, they can't feel any resistance, no muscle flexation. They feel a relaxed, soft, unflexed body. But beneath it, there is a feel like iron or a wall of rock. That is from the special structure that comes from training of the internal tissues and alignment of joints combined to receive and to feed force.
Hard referees to hand, feet, knees, and elbows. I.e. striking techniques.
This video gives a good demonstration, however, the Zooming Transitions from scene to scene are Taxing on the eyes.
Thanks.
Which is the name of the musi? I want to use it to complement with my training... it's really harmonious.
Een erg mooie demo...
Ben ik met je eens
It is called 'ude kansetsu gatame'
Kind regards, Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
Very nice !
nice video
amazing....
very nicely done , but it is basic aikido/daitoryu jujutsu waza no Aiki waza here
What is the name of the technique demonstrated at 0:48 ?
Perfecto!
What is the difference between Aikido vs Aiki Jujutsu?
+John Hardin 'I was the Director of General Affairs at the Kobukan, beginning around 1942, and I helped out Ueshiba Sensei in daily matters. ‘Aikido,’ rather than being a specifically selected name, was the term used to refer to “Butokukai-ryu” Aiki Budo within the Nihon Butokukai. …The Butokukai was an independent umbrella organization for the martial arts and it also was in charge of martial arts in the police departments. It was very difficult to create a new section in the Butokukai at that time. Mr. Hisatomi [of the Kodokan] proposed the establishment of a new section, including arts for actual fighting based on jujutsu techniques…. There was discussion within the Butokukai about the choice of name for this new section….Mr. Hisatomi argued for his proposal energetically, and explained that ‘aikido’ would be better name than Aiki Budo for this new section, because it would be better stress the idea of ‘michi’ or Way….In the end, no one opposed this proposal. ”- - - Minoru Hirai Shihan, Aikido Pioneers - Prewar Era, pp. 260-1'
As you can read in the excerpt, the name Aikido was not chosen by Ueshiba sensei as opposed to general belief amongst many aikidoka.
Aikido as it is trained nowadays in the vast majority of the dojo around the world uses the pedagogical frame that was established by Kisshomaru Doshu. Yoseikan founder Mochizuki MInoru was trained in the early 30's and was taught the old aikijujutsu techniques.
Although the essence of the art is always the same, it is fair to say that the pedagogical frame of aikijujutsu is more biased towards self protection first while in aikido self perfection (michi) is the main goal.
Aiki is aiki, whether one traines aikido or aikijujutsu. Historical evidence (film and photo) clearly shows that there is not a big difference in the way Ueshiba sensei performed his techniques, inclusive atemi.
The truth is out there, you just have to search for it with an open mind! (A good place to start is 'Aikido Journal')
It is difficult to explain all this with limited text and things aren't black and white, so please, if you want to know the history of Aikido...read the Aikido Journal interviews and articles.
kind regards,Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
Sorry for the late thank you. Thank you very much for your reply.
it also looks like they know some katori shinto ryu
because oya waza sankyo and pretty standard ikyo aren't aiki?
hola muchos saludos y mucha paz en Dios.amen en jesucristo amen oh aleluya.
music???
good stuff
do people, watching, know aikido is different to aiki jujutsu?
+Good Old England in general terms you are right but this kind of Aikijujutsu was born after the creation of Aikido
+HECTOR ARTURO well, to say aiki jujutsu is the ancestor of aikido, is simply correct I would say, not in general terms.
If this is a later derivation after aikido, then it should really not be called aiki jujutsu really? it would not actually be aiki jujutsu. Aikido is a modern art, so anything derived or created after it, must be extremely young ... when was this form created? aikido was developed, fully into what it is, around 1930 right? .. when you say it was born after aikido, are you saying "from" aikido?
I don't think many people are not familiar with aiki jujutsu, sure if you mention jujutsu, people now immediately think of brazilian jujutsu or gracie jujutsu.
+Daniel Murray 'I was the Director of General Affairs at the Kobukan, beginning around 1942, and I helped out Ueshiba Sensei in daily matters. ‘Aikido,’ rather than being a specifically selected name, was the term used to refer to “Butokukai-ryu” Aiki Budo within the Nihon Butokukai. …The Butokukai was an independent, umbrella organization for the martial arts, and it also was in charge of martial arts in the police departments. It was very difficult to create a new section in the Butokukai at that time. Mr. Hisatomi [of the Kodokan] proposed the establishment of a new section, including arts for actual fighting based on jujutsu techniques…. There was discussion within the Butokukai about the choice of name for this new section….Mr. Hisatomi argued for his proposal energetically, and explained that ‘aikido’ would be better name than Aiki Budo for this new section, because it would be better to stress the idea of ‘michi’ or Way….In the end, no one opposed this proposal. ”- - - Minoru Hirai Shihan, Aikido Pioneers - Prewar Era, pp. 260-1'
As you can read in the excerpt, the name Aikido was not chosen by Ueshiba sensei as opposed to general belief amongst many aikidoka.
Aikido as it is trained nowadays in the vast majority of the dojo around the world uses the pedagogical frame that was established by Kisshomaru Doshu. Yoseikan founder Mochizuki MInoru was trained in the early 30's and was taught the old aikijujutsu techniques.
Although the essence of the art is always the same, it is fair to say that the pedagogical frame of aikijujutsu is more biased towards self protection first while in aikido self perfection (michi) is the main goal.
Aiki is aiki, whether one traines aikido or aikijujutsu. Historical evidence (film and photo) clearly shows that there is not a big difference in the way Ueshiba sensei performed his techniques, inclusive atemi.
The truth is out there, you just have to search for it with an open mind! (A good place to start is 'Aikido Journal')
It is difficult to explain all this with limited text and things aren't black and white, so please, if you want to know the history of Aikido...read the Aikido Journal interviews and articles.
kind regards,Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
+HECTOR ARTURO 'I was the Director of General Affairs at the Kobukan, beginning around 1942, and I helped out Ueshiba Sensei in daily matters. ‘Aikido,’ rather than being a specifically selected name, was the term used to refer to “Butokukai-ryu” Aiki Budo within the Nihon Butokukai. …The Butokukai was an independent, umbrella organization for the martial arts, and it also was in charge of martial arts in the police departments. It was very difficult to create a new section in the Butokukai at that time. Mr. Hisatomi [of the Kodokan] proposed the establishment of a new section, including arts for actual fighting based on jujutsu techniques…. There was discussion within the Butokukai about the choice of name for this new section….Mr. Hisatomi argued for his proposal energetically, and explained that ‘aikido’ would be better name than Aiki Budo for this new section, because it would be better to stress the idea of ‘michi’ or Way….In the end, no one opposed this proposal. ”- - - Minoru Hirai Shihan, Aikido Pioneers - Prewar Era, pp. 260-1'
As you can read in the excerpt, the name Aikido was not chosen by Ueshiba sensei as opposed to general belief amongst many aikidoka.
Aikido as it is trained nowadays in the vast majority of the dojo around the world uses the pedagogical frame that was established by Kisshomaru Doshu. Yoseikan founder Mochizuki MInoru was trained in the early 30's and was taught the old aikijujutsu techniques.
Although the essence of the art is always the same, it is fair to say that the pedagogical frame of aikijujutsu is more biased towards self protection first while in aikido self perfection (michi) is the main goal.
Aiki is aiki, whether one traines aikido or aikijujutsu. Historical evidence (film and photo) clearly shows that there is not a big difference in the way Ueshiba sensei performed his techniques, inclusive atemi.
The truth is out there, you just have to search for it with an open mind! (A good place to start is 'Aikido Journal')
It is difficult to explain all this with limited text and things aren't black and white, so please, if you want to know the history of Aikido...read the Aikido Journal interviews and articles.
kind regards,Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
That was excellent. I am not familiar with Yoseikan. Is it related to Daito-ryu aikijujustu? I used to do Yoshinkan Aikido and see many similarities in techniques.
Mochizuki (founder of the Yoseikan) was trained by Ueshiba at the very start of the 30's while he still taught Daito ryu. Mochizuki even met Takeda Sokaku once. Shioda was trained a few years later, also in Daito ryu. Evidently many similarities occur.
Kind regards,
Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
Chauveau sensei, I loved the video. Can you comment on Kenji Tomiki? Did you meet or train with him? We know we was an established judoka under Kano sensei before studying with Ueshiba sensei. As Ueshiba's earliest dedicated senior student (I believe, before Shioda sensei), did Tomiki also study Daito ryu and aikijutsu? I would think so, but I haven't heard discussion of this.
Thank you for your kind words. Since Tomiki sensei passed away in december '79, I never met nor trained under him. He was indeed 6 years Shioda sensei's senior, Tomiki first trained under Ueshiba in the summer of '26 and Shioda sensei entered the Kobukan dojo in '32. Both were trained in Daito ryu aikijujutsu.
Kind regards,
Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
Yoseikan teaches the Aikido that existed before the war and before Ueshiba changed the techniques to make them softer, more peaceful and more of an exercise. His student, Mochizuki didn't like the changes and believed that budo should be for defence first and started his own school. That's not to say that a true expert of that newer art can't be a formidable enemy.
There is a super interesting chapter on mochizuki in prewar masters by s Pranin. If I remember correctly he was also taught judo by the founder of judo. Did he have a school in Tennessee or somewhere like that?
Osu. Great Video
super
Hi,
I'm looking at taking this up as a compliment to my kung fu training and would like to ask some questions.
What happens if you apply these techniques to a person who is not used to receiving them or falling and rolling?
Would you break their arm or leg?
Does this art teach a follow up to techniques which do not go as expected?
+staminapromos
Indeed, if applied to a non initiated one would break or dislocate joints; since aiki based martial arts strive to apply a technique that suits one's position, situation and distance, follow up techniques are part of our curriculum.
kind regards,
Hugo Chauveau
Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
super!
Why only we see demonstrations but no real fighting on tandoori of aikijujutsu and aikido I want to see this more real to believe in the techniques and this needs some kicks and punches in real time to motivate the people to like as a way to defeat
Eduardo Leal: most of the traditional martial tehniques are designed to teach you body mechanics. I don't want to sound like those guys ''they are deadly'' but you can get injured (I did, several times) if you do it for real. I used to spar with a friend and more than once he passed out (I passed out too). Last time he felt bad for 1 week after a throw. You can injure your head or your neck. When you demonstrate it's easy to take the fall because you know what tehnique will be done on you, but during a sparing (which most of the time ends in a full contact fight when you are a beginner) you risk a lot doing some of the tehniques because you don't know what your partener is trying on you. In Aikijujutsu and Aikido we don't use JUDO tatami (which are better for throws) but some Karate hard fashioned tatami. Taking uncontroled falls on those will make you feel all your insides or pass out :)))))
Estilos que sofreram influencia do Ueshiba, Aiki jutsu é mais primitivo antigo e as técnicas mais direto que isso.
Super film... Pozdrowienia ze Świdwina.
some of it is high level as they are aiki-no-jutsu techniques:)
مشترك جديد ياقلبي
Damn 1:48 never seen that in other aikido.
It's because this is not aïkido.
gotta be honest. I had never seen it before either. it's super slick looking and probably requires a very high level of mastery
TheBoMaAn971 It is Aikido. It's called sutemi waza. "Sacrifice throw". Some dojo's still teach it. Mines does.
Those are the sutemis Minoru Mochizuki incorporated into his art and which he got from one of the first jujitsu systems he learned as a teenager. Really, there like 50 variations on that theme. Personally, I think there's too much of it in Yoseikan.
@@Igaluit true.. he learned Gyokkushin-ryu Jujutsu from from the last Souke, Oshima Sanjuro.
Yeah thanks.
nice!!!!
i dont understand where's the aiki in the first techniques...
Looks good and in contrary to Aikido, I understand the mechanics of the techniques, also the tai-sabaki, today’s Aikido is total nonsens, and isn’t a martial art anymore but a health and body system based on Aiki Jitsu, this is still the real thing osu guy’s 👊
Hirai, not Hiai.
It's like Akido but doesn't suck
real stuff
33 thumbs down? You got to be kidding
good use of kiaijutsu
👍👍👍
Когда читаю: "Айки-дзюцу" - всегда открываю видео с надеждой увидеть "айки", но к сожалению очередное видео ограничивается только "дзюцу". Зачем называть школу так, чтобы потом не уметь продемонстрировать этот самый принцип "айки"? Назовите "Дзю-дзюцу" - это будет честно. Истины ради - основателем школы "Ёсейкан" является Минору Мотидзуки и и авторское название, которое он дал своему направлению "Ёсейкан Будо".
🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾 Uussshhh
Nice :)
one thing the cross zoom transition es soooo anoying, better use cross dissolve or just plain cut
Doomo Arigato
sur certaines techniques, le tori tape du pied comme un lapin male ! c'est pas commun ça, en arts martiaux ! ça doit etre le ki-pié .......
"Oyy!!" "HA!"
Hocus pokus Cant see this working on Mike Tyson.
dobre
Yonkyo Osae
03:29
02:43
02:04
This guys budo is ace. But Aiki arts really need yo start adopting new strikes into the training. All we are learning is the art. No-one strikes the way we do in training. we are learning nothing useless outside of the principles.
When friend gonna shake your hand you do this ----> 1:10
Knife defenses would be good - or can't YAJ handle real knife attacks? Too many people attack with weapons these days !
Primo, knife defenses are considered higher level techniques. We refrain from showing these because people might get the wrong impression of 'easy technique' and copy the forms without proper training.
Secundo, the aim of our videos is to build bridges between all aiki schools, not to show off.
Kind regards,
Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
Practice makes perfect!!!
tosenkyo If I may ask, what are the main differences between Aikido schools and Aiki-jujutsu schools?
nykout 'I was the Director of General Affairs at the Kobukan, beginning around 1942, and I helped out Ueshiba Sensei in daily matters. ‘Aikido,’ rather than being a specifically selected name, was the term used to refer to “Butokukai-ryu” Aiki Budo within the Nihon Butokukai. …The Butokukai was an independent, umbrella organization for the martial arts, and it also was in charge of martial arts in the police departments. It was very difficult to create a new section in the Butokukai at that time. Mr. Hisatomi [of the Kodokan] proposed the establishment of a new section, including arts for actual fighting based on jujutsu techniques…. There was discussion within the Butokukai about the choice of name for this new section….Mr. Hisatomi argued for his proposal energetically, and explained that ‘aikido’ would be better name than Aiki Budo for this new section, because it would be better to stress the idea of ‘michi’ or Way….In the end, no one opposed this proposal. ”- - - Minoru Hirai Shihan, Aikido Pioneers - Prewar Era, pp. 260-1'
As you can read in the excerpt, the name Aikido was not chosen by Ueshiba sensei as opposed to general belief amongst many aikidoka.
Aikido as it is trained nowadays in the vast majority of the dojo around the world uses the pedagogical frame that was established by Kisshomaru Doshu. Yoseikan founder Mochizuki MInoru was trained in the early 30's and was taught the old aikijujutsu techniques.
Although the essence of the art is always the same, it is fair to say that the pedagogical frame of aikijujutsu is more biased towards self protection first while in aikido self perfection (michi) is the main goal.
Aiki is aiki, whether one traines aikido or aikijujutsu. Historical evidence (film and photo) clearly shows that there is not a big difference in the way Ueshiba sensei performed his techniques, inclusive atemi.
The truth is out there, you just have to search for it with an open mind! (A good place to start is 'Aikido Journal')
It is difficult to explain all this with limited text and things aren't black and white, so please, if you want to know the history of Aikido...read the Aikido Journal interviews and articles.
kind regards,Hugo Chauveau, Dojo-cho Taki Dojo
tosenkyo Thank you kindly, that was a very in depth answer.
OTTIME TECNICHE
I swear those transitions gave me a headache
>.
pe-/ga-wai = (government) officer
peng-/ga-wa = head of village
I wouldn't count on this working in a street fight. No disrespect but the way those "attacks" are made is just to make the "defender" look good with those moves. There was no resistance at all.
why don't you just use a gun instead.
Martial arts exist for a reason. Not only can it improve physical stamina and flexibility. But there's also that BUDO spirit.
And never blame any kind of martial for it to "not work." It's the person.
More importantly, if you were a true professional martial artist, first lesson is to remove yourself from the threat.
Your words give me the sense that you like to go force with force, which you can, hence the gun fits you more, no martial art can help you.
Nice but the truth is Aikido doesn't work.
@Vui Programmer well said.Now,if we could only get that to sink in to the people that defend aikido as an effective self defence art.
@Vui Programmer then it's useless.If you trsin in an art that can only beat people that don't know how to fight then it's pathetic.
@Vui Programmer yeah mate.I don't need a martial arts history lesson and you aren't going to tell me anything i haven't already heard 1000 times before.
Everybody with any real martial arts or boxing training knows that aikido is a joke.
If you want to believe in the mystic arts then good luck to you.
@Vui Programmer nah,you're right mate.All good.
Mostly Jui-jitsu very little aiki-juijitsu and no aikijutsu
hahahahahah (^.^)