ISRO Small Rocket Failure Explained | SSLV D1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 207

  • @shubhamshitole2010
    @shubhamshitole2010 Рік тому +199

    This is incredible, since this launch was just 5 months ago and they did all failure analysis and improvements in just 5 months. And this is very fast in rocket industry.

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Рік тому +76

      it is decent time, what is nice is them giving such nice info to public

    • @jigsaw2281
      @jigsaw2281 Рік тому +1

      @@GareebScientist Bahot bura lga public m nhi aana chahiye tha

    • @Di7iPJ05hi
      @Di7iPJ05hi Рік тому +4

      @@jigsaw2281 bhai unhone bola ki ye bahut hi acchi chij hai ki ISRO sab kuchh public ke liye available kara uske kaaran hum abhi video dekh paa rahe hai

    • @_dusktildawnne
      @_dusktildawnne Рік тому

      @@jigsaw2281 bhai translatior use kar liya kar agar Eng me sentence agar complicated lagte ho to

    • @animeJod360
      @animeJod360 Рік тому +1

      @@GareebScientist 😂 tu he master hai , space science mai . Decent time, halwa samjh rakha hai sab kuch

  • @PowerTrain
    @PowerTrain Рік тому +139

    Nicely explained. Hopefully ISRO makes more such detailed reports and not be vauge anymore

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Рік тому +24

      Ikr, feels so good to see such details

    • @animeJod360
      @animeJod360 Рік тому

      Not be vauge anymore ?
      Tell me a single incident where ISRO was unclear . Vauge word suit on NASA .

  • @iamhssingh
    @iamhssingh Рік тому +36

    Wow, watched your video after some time. Amazed by your experience. And perplexed by the processes in place by ISRO. I can definitely take some inspiration in my Software Engineering designs from this!

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Рік тому +8

      yess, redudancy major part of their system design, aur kaise ho bhai

  • @adityavardhansingh3501
    @adityavardhansingh3501 Рік тому +35

    Very well explained! Thanks a lot for bringing the SSLV-D1 FAC report in easy terms :)

  • @priyansutank
    @priyansutank Рік тому +11

    6:47 It clearly depicts how that net like structure helps in minimising the weight without compromising structural rigidity.
    It's a good idea to make a video on design and manufacturing aspects of isro's rockets and how they are manufacturing them.

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Рік тому +2

      No that's for hot staging. They fire the 2nd stage while attached to 1st stage so no seperation retro rockets are needed

    • @priyansutank
      @priyansutank Рік тому +2

      Whoa that'll put lot of loading on lower stage tanks! Anyways I was wondering how (and who) manufacture these high melting point superalloys to fabricate intricate parts like fuel pumps and injector nozzles etc. Would be great if you make a video on that.

  • @SpaceTechExplorationprogram123
    @SpaceTechExplorationprogram123 Рік тому +39

    Its good to see how ISRO is publishing reports in public and explaining criterias
    Its well known for the tax payers also ....
    Hopes for the next SSLV launch
    🤞

    • @arnablahiri7023
      @arnablahiri7023 Місяць тому

      but did tax payers understand it? do we really discuss science in dining table?

  • @KuchBhiMehta
    @KuchBhiMehta Рік тому +3

    Love the comment guidelines ❤️ Video toh sab best hai hi

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Рік тому +2

      Yess, comment section clean and most importantly quality rakhna difficult!!, thank you bhai ❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @meetbhavsar1762
    @meetbhavsar1762 Рік тому +16

    Sir your video is best I am std9 and I love science because of your videos

  • @SpaceTech4kids
    @SpaceTech4kids Рік тому +2

    आसान भाषा में रॉकेट के टेक्निकल terms को बहुत ही सही explain किया है।
    बस एक correction - rocket में initial phase me open loop guidance ke peeche ka मुख्य कारण ये है कि यदि रॉकेट अपने पथ से ज्यादा विचलित भी हो जाए तो होने दे, क्योंकि correction ke चक्कर में atmosphere की वजह से रॉकेट टूट भी सकता है।

  • @physco4641
    @physco4641 Рік тому +7

    so well explained brother. Good to see ISRO providing detailed information on failure rather than hiding it, like good old days.

  • @AKASHSINGH4IND
    @AKASHSINGH4IND Рік тому +5

    Chandrayaan 3 phir se delayed ho gya because isro ko pehele LVM-3 ko commercial missions k liye use Krna hai... Let's hope ki ish saal CY3 launch ho jaye 🙏

  • @AshishBangwal
    @AshishBangwal Рік тому +4

    its fascinating to know how most complex machine are based on simple logics like errors , accuracy , threshold etc...

  • @ankitnautiyal2568
    @ankitnautiyal2568 Рік тому +3

    Great Explanation! Thanks for covering this in such a fine detail. All the best to ISRO for SSLV D2.

  • @tssri8071
    @tssri8071 Рік тому +14

    Good info bro. Your channel is probably the only one that goes into this much detail about our Space sector.
    Though I'm proud of what ISRO has been doing. I feel they should be more open, their communication with the public is poor to say the least. Look how NASA or SpaceX doing in that aspect. significantly more people are excited when they announce a new program, a now rocket, new tech,... therefore there is more interest in learning about space, rockets, etc.
    But in ISRO's case there is only a small community, who are interested in such things. I hope this changes in the times to come. I hope in that process more people be inspired and actually want to take up space tech, engineering and go on to become good engineers and scientists who will drive our country forward, we have a huge potential in this sector.

    • @shivam_nagar69
      @shivam_nagar69 Рік тому +3

      just look at videos of ISRO missions with title containing "failed", it has lakhs of views but successful missions have in thousands
      people love failures over success of others

    • @prabhat_me_1391
      @prabhat_me_1391 Рік тому +1

      They need a good PR team.

  • @anandsharma7430
    @anandsharma7430 Рік тому +3

    Brilliant simplified explanation. Thank you so much!

  • @alifepenneddown
    @alifepenneddown Рік тому +2

    This is one of the finest videos on this channel. Kudos!!! Keep it up bro!

  • @iimcrandomgamer711
    @iimcrandomgamer711 Рік тому +2

    Wow, so more then mechanical we do mistake in onbord logic system.
    But i am happy we learn from mistake ,and hope they not do same mistake in future development of rockets.

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Рік тому +2

      yea, code can make or break the best hardware out there

  • @astronotyet
    @astronotyet Рік тому +4

    10:20 the bird on the bottm right. RIP

  • @mrityunjaygupta6202
    @mrityunjaygupta6202 Рік тому +5

    So beautifully explained. 🙏🏽

  • @critiqadeoppphai
    @critiqadeoppphai Рік тому +4

    Finally ISRO gave us the correct info after 6mo!!
    Anyways hats off to the efforts of ISRO and GAREEB SCIENTIST..
    JAI HIND JAI BHARAT

  • @cartoonistify
    @cartoonistify Рік тому +2

    Very well & nicely explained! Even the average person can comprehend clearly

  • @kushagra9781
    @kushagra9781 Рік тому +2

    GS, please make a vdo series on how isro manufacture rockets and satellites from scratch..

  • @diptichanda8667
    @diptichanda8667 Рік тому

    I went from over the top Indian space ship to down to earth technical explanation. It's refreshing to see reasonable people explaining things so reasonably.

  • @sanjaybarnwal0000
    @sanjaybarnwal0000 Рік тому +1

    Bhai apke wajah se bahot sare (space start-up) bannne ge. bhai jo bhi unki problem hogi wo apko contact karenge bhai salute hai👍👍👌

    • @sanjaybarnwal0000
      @sanjaybarnwal0000 Рік тому +1

      Unkie space sector me unki problem ko solve karna
      Thanks 🙏

  • @patxd3425
    @patxd3425 Рік тому

    Excellent work bro, alway like you the deep dive in that technical Details and your thorough explanation.. good luck to you & ISRO. Jai Hind

  • @kumarshashank7532
    @kumarshashank7532 Рік тому +2

    I think it is more important for ISRO to share the failure investigation report publicly because it wants to do more commercial launches. No doubt ISRO launches are most economical but if any organisation is more transparent to customers then it adds to customers' confidence. I think report should have as much information as necessary not more not less.

  • @er.ganesh4435
    @er.ganesh4435 Рік тому +1

    Thank You Dada.. nice videos. You just teach us like a pro teaches children. 👌👌👌🎉🎉💐💐❤️

  • @nickyjadhav
    @nickyjadhav Рік тому

    I loved the details. Please bring more of such stuff. Technical details make videos more interesting.

  • @bhardwajsiddharth
    @bhardwajsiddharth Рік тому +1

    Explained it like a teacher ! 👍

  • @raakaagent5929
    @raakaagent5929 Рік тому

    Amazing work. Its always great to understand things in details.
    Thank you for explaining this to us.

  • @animesick7458
    @animesick7458 Рік тому +1

    Bhai rlv lex ke testing kab hogi??

  • @pervysage_jiraiyaa
    @pervysage_jiraiyaa Рік тому +1

    Thanks for the elaborate explanation🙂

  • @aakarshjha1633
    @aakarshjha1633 Рік тому +3

    Accountability is great.For a government organisation like ISRO,it's very decent time taken to give failure analysis.I am happy that they care about taxpayer's money

  • @apsaramakeupstudio
    @apsaramakeupstudio Рік тому +3

    Sir please answer this question,
    What if we convert Vikram-S into a mack 5 missile.
    It is cheaper than other options.
    We just need to attach seaker and warhead to it.
    Please answer sir
    👍👍♥️

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Рік тому +3

      already such missiles exist, redundancy ka kiya karoge, plus it will become difficult for skyroot to use some software as certain software only can be used for non defence. and missiles are not as simploe as attach warhead on SRB and fly, itna saimple hota toh sab karte na ?

    • @apsaramakeupstudio
      @apsaramakeupstudio Рік тому

      @@GareebScientist Thank you sir.
      ♥️👍♥️

    • @nikhilreddypaladugu621
      @nikhilreddypaladugu621 Рік тому +1

      Indian arm forces do not prefer liquid fuel missiles due their maintenance and refueling,they prefer mostly solid fuel missiles.

    • @spidy9883
      @spidy9883 Рік тому +1

      @@nikhilreddypaladugu621 btw vikram rocket is also use solid rocket fuel for both stages.

    • @tge2102
      @tge2102 Рік тому +1

      Even if we did that, it would become a ballistic missile.
      India already has a comprehensive asensal of ballistic missiles(Agni series, K series, Pralay and Shaurya being the main ones).

  • @astrobot_me
    @astrobot_me Рік тому +1

    Awesome Video GS, Well Explained
    Excited for Upcoming D2 launch

  • @Harsh.P
    @Harsh.P Рік тому +1

    Does the stage detach first and then the engine for next stage starts and rocket moves on or engine starts first and then detach the earlier stage ?

  • @nssdatta
    @nssdatta Рік тому +1

    Let's Go SSLV D2 launch 🥳

  • @prakhargupta1409
    @prakhargupta1409 Рік тому +2

    Does SSLV use a relatively new technology for INS implementation, resulting in the possibility of incapacitating due to vibration as you mentioned? If not, then I believe the tech is already quite mature, and might have been used in PSLV or GSLV as well which are quite successful as we know. Then, how can one explain the failure of INS?

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Рік тому

      Use new ins developed with MEMS Gyros and a different accelerometer

  • @anirudhrajath211
    @anirudhrajath211 Рік тому +1

    bhai RLV TD LEX complete ho gaya kya?

  • @guts197
    @guts197 Рік тому +1

    Great Explanation 🤓👍

  • @anandsharma7430
    @anandsharma7430 Рік тому +2

    IANA scientist. I watched some video about how rockets can navigate by looking at the stars in the sky, called Star Tracker.
    Maybe this cannot be used because of the high velocity, bright sunlight, reflections from existing orbital debris, etc?
    If not for those factors (or if those can be overcome) that would be a very good backup navigation system capable of withstanding all kinds of flight path deviations.

  • @correction6231
    @correction6231 Рік тому +2

    Gs deserve a lots of subscribers for well explanation 👏 👍

  • @adityapanda2464
    @adityapanda2464 Рік тому +1

    isro is a gems but you should also make videos on other countrys rocket and working proces

    • @adityavardhansingh3501
      @adityavardhansingh3501 Рік тому +4

      There are already many videos about them, but very few on Indian rocketry & science

  • @sumanmitra913
    @sumanmitra913 Рік тому +1

    Incredible explanations. Thank you and please keep up the good work..

  • @GPSpaceTechAndKnowledge
    @GPSpaceTechAndKnowledge Рік тому +1

    Sir mera dream hamesha se raha hai is ISRO mein jana
    aap ki vajah se wo hamesha positive rahata hai

  • @parasmodi4746
    @parasmodi4746 Рік тому

    Nice explained bro
    That's why it's called rocket science

  • @ShantanuBhadoria
    @ShantanuBhadoria Рік тому

    NAVIC, magnetometers(3d compass) etc. Are state sensors (final state value) and most state sensors suffer from some inaccuracy which is corrected with sensor fusion of state sensors with delta sensors (rate of change of state) like accelerometers and gyroscopes. This is likely why NAVIC alone is not the preferred choice of guidance but it may be a somewhat reasonable backup in an emergency.
    If you are interested, I'd suggest reading up on algorithms used for sensor fusion like kalman filter.
    To be more confusing, accelerometers can act as both delta and state sensor. As state orientation sensor to point to direction of gravitational force which dominates all other acceleration in most of the common cases near a gravitational body, as delta sensor for magnitude and direction of acceleration (once gravitational acceleration is filtered out) to calculate change of speed and from that distance travelled.
    This could be an interesting topic for a video :)

  • @vibhanshududi2532
    @vibhanshududi2532 Рік тому +2

    Good analysis 👍✌️💖

  • @anonna91
    @anonna91 Рік тому

    The FAC summary actually says that the VTM bypass was programmed. "VTM ignition was bypassed as programmed since it could be a deterrent to the success of salvage option in some cases." And, the reason for transparency is apparent. :p

  • @sachinpandeyatd
    @sachinpandeyatd Рік тому +1

    Imagine how hard it must be to implement all these, my mind can't even imagine it

  • @abhirajsinghpawar
    @abhirajsinghpawar Рік тому

    Thanks for amazing and valuable content brother

  • @aadhyatmverma8962
    @aadhyatmverma8962 Рік тому

    Thank you so much for such an easy application 🔥

  • @kanakroy9994
    @kanakroy9994 Рік тому

    Bahut kuch janne ko mila.

  • @handyman7147
    @handyman7147 Рік тому

    Nice description. Please try to make the videos as short as possible.

  • @TitaniumSV5
    @TitaniumSV5 Рік тому +7

    5 days more for 2nd test flight🤞

  • @AnuragSingh-vk1vz
    @AnuragSingh-vk1vz Рік тому

    hi . thanks for this video. navic system data may need some relativistic correction, because there are many fast moving systems symultaneously. It will be very complex to choose which values to rely on. it is very fun physics why such things happen.

  • @SandeepSingh-or7jr
    @SandeepSingh-or7jr Рік тому

    9:28 Ye logical table best tha ..samajhna aasan tha process ko ..

  • @floatinsun
    @floatinsun Рік тому

    Failure is a stepping stone for success ... Failure is learning for something big.

  • @soumalya
    @soumalya Рік тому

    ISRO ke engines ke bare me ek detailed technical video ho to accha rahega jaise vo kaunsa engine cycle use karte hai(eg: expander cycle etc)

  • @PrajjalakChattopadhyay
    @PrajjalakChattopadhyay Рік тому +1

    Don’t they have multiple redundant IMUs with sensor fusion and veto logic?

  • @gorthyharikrishnasai2281
    @gorthyharikrishnasai2281 Рік тому +1

    Today sslv d2 successful just 5months after amazing

  • @naturalviews0.9
    @naturalviews0.9 Рік тому

    Hello sir me aap se puchna chahta hu 2023 me isro ke exibition kah or kin kin city me honge please make video

  • @olaolaolaola8663
    @olaolaolaola8663 Рік тому

    Thank you for the explanation. Give a download button to download this video instead of usual third party tool. People need to save this video for reference.

  • @trinaghosh1468
    @trinaghosh1468 Рік тому

    Love my country's space institution .

  • @nuro6119
    @nuro6119 Рік тому

    Sir salt breader or thorium nuclear reactors ki progress kya hai abhi

  • @mickeyagrawal2001
    @mickeyagrawal2001 Рік тому

    Awesome video and explanation.

  • @sunilnair4755
    @sunilnair4755 Рік тому

    when they will show the video display similar to spacex

  • @satyam_patel
    @satyam_patel Рік тому +3

    We Love ISRO ❤️❤️❤️

  • @Lmao69
    @Lmao69 Рік тому

    Any update on chandrayan 3?

  • @spaceboy1362
    @spaceboy1362 Рік тому +2

    Sirrrrr rocket ke liye konsi coding lagti hai please bata dijiye

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Рік тому

      aisa koi fixed language nahi hein, different sub systems ke different languages ho sakte hein, teams ke upar depend

    • @__raghu.vir_
      @__raghu.vir_ Рік тому

      @@GareebScientist hmm shi he, mostly same project pr alag alag teams different language use krte he, python, c++, c, matlab are comman...

    • @spaceboy1362
      @spaceboy1362 Рік тому +1

      @@GareebScientist okkk sirr thankuuuu

    • @spaceboy1362
      @spaceboy1362 Рік тому

      @@__raghu.vir_ thnx brother!!!!!

    • @spaceboy1362
      @spaceboy1362 Рік тому

      @@__raghu.vir_ aap bhi rocket scientist hai bahiya?

  • @thehyperdimentinaltraveller

    Today I filed a RTI regarding it's stance on space debris and if they're taking any measures to tackle it. Eagerly waiting for their response 🙂

  • @frodobaggins2852
    @frodobaggins2852 Рік тому

    Wow.. so well. explained

  • @spidy9883
    @spidy9883 Рік тому

    Very well explained.

  • @pervysage_jiraiyaa
    @pervysage_jiraiyaa Рік тому

    What is difference btwn semi cryogenic and cryogenic ? And why is so much diffrence in there fuel.

  • @AKASHSINGH4IND
    @AKASHSINGH4IND Рік тому +1

    SSLV D2 is really going to launch on Feb 10 ?

  • @arnabkundu3406
    @arnabkundu3406 Рік тому

    mast video tha .....well explained

  • @zeroknowledgehub
    @zeroknowledgehub Рік тому

    Does the final stage stays in the same orbit of satellite for somedays before it decays?

  • @symonthelappillil5972
    @symonthelappillil5972 Рік тому

    Equipment Bay , not baby. You will find similar structures in PSLV and GSLV too

  • @deeptruthchanneldtc6770
    @deeptruthchanneldtc6770 Рік тому

    Bhai INS ka capacity increase nahi ho sakta kya? Jis se woh jaldi saturate naa ho.

  • @AmanRaj-gu7ce
    @AmanRaj-gu7ce Рік тому

    GooD Video Pranav.

  • @soumalya
    @soumalya Рік тому +1

    Bhai inko code ke mamle me thora aur redundancy pehle se sochna chahiye yha

  • @zeroknowledgehub
    @zeroknowledgehub Рік тому

    Won't the finalstage damages operational satellites if it decays uncontrollably?

  • @Sreerag01
    @Sreerag01 Рік тому +1

    So looks like design is not challenged enough in isro, many things are assumed that too in a real launch, not a failure based thought. Not discounting all achievements by isro but i doubt top mgnt is listening any callout from bottom. Same issue was with nasa. Communication is only top to bottom. It works most of the time but not everytime.

  • @zeroknowledgehub
    @zeroknowledgehub Рік тому +1

    What happens to finalstage after injecting satellites will the isro controllably(guided)deorbit or make it fall and burn in earth's atmosphere?

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Рік тому +1

      Stay in orbit for some time. After few months or years slowly decay and burn up on reentey

  • @SPARSH_ROBOTICS_pvt_ltd
    @SPARSH_ROBOTICS_pvt_ltd Рік тому

    PLS do a video on this

  • @zeroknowledgehub
    @zeroknowledgehub Рік тому

    Why the satellite at high altitude during injection time for example Apogee is 510km perigee is 520km but during injection of satellite isro telemetry shows 540 550km height why?will it lose height and comes to 510*520km orbit finally

  • @agastya_gaur
    @agastya_gaur Рік тому

    Nice explanation

  • @SanjayChauhanMumbai
    @SanjayChauhanMumbai Рік тому

    Excellent video..Keep it up

  • @archuss
    @archuss Рік тому +1

    SSLV will roar🦁🚀✨

  • @patelkrutarth7509
    @patelkrutarth7509 Рік тому +1

    Thank you

  • @archuss
    @archuss Рік тому

    Thank you GS bhaiya

  • @satyam_patel
    @satyam_patel Рік тому +2

    Waise D2 Kab Launch Hoga ???

  • @Rajas_naik
    @Rajas_naik Рік тому

    truly amazing

  • @sohammukherjee9796
    @sohammukherjee9796 Рік тому

    after this video, I realised that rocket avionics is my true calling in life.

  • @TheVedantPatil
    @TheVedantPatil Рік тому

    Mujhe ek question hain: If Solid Rocket Booster dosent give throttling power then how they control the direction of rocket ? Is there a communication system on the rocket which helps ?

    • @GareebScientist
      @GareebScientist  Рік тому

      By moving the nozzle i.e. Thrust vetxor control or orienting entire rocket using thrusters

    • @TheVedantPatil
      @TheVedantPatil Рік тому

      Got it thank you 👍

  • @jitendrakushwaha2767
    @jitendrakushwaha2767 Рік тому

    Jai hind ❤ 🇮🇳 🙏 jai bharat ❤

  • @suyogtadke7985
    @suyogtadke7985 Рік тому

    Gov reduced space budget this year, thats big shame

  • @zeroknowledgehub
    @zeroknowledgehub Рік тому

    why isro telemetry display lshows for example perigee of 520km, Apogee of 525km and altitude of 540km during injection of satellite,my question is if the orbit of 520*525km then why it is injected at 540km height does it lose height and comes to orbit(520*525km)finally? I hope u understand please reply me

  • @Navyguy
    @Navyguy Рік тому

    *Jai Hind, Jai Bharat* 🇮🇳

  • @zeroknowledgehub
    @zeroknowledgehub Рік тому

    why isro telemetry display during launch shows for example perigee of 520km, Apogee of 525km and height of 540km during injection of satellite my question is if the orbit of 520*525km then why it is injected at 540km height does it lose height and comes to orbit(520*525km)finally? I hope u unders😆tand