Is Iron Man’s Arc Reactor Possible? | StarTalk
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 лис 2024
- Neil uses physics to talk about the feasibility of Iron Man’s super power, the Arc Reactor.
➡ Subscribe: bit.ly/NatGeoSu...
➡ Watch all clips of StarTalk here: bit.ly/WatchSta...
➡ Get More StarTalk: bit.ly/NGStartalk
About StarTalk:
Host Neil deGrasse Tyson brings together celebrities, scientists and comedians to explore a variety of cosmic topics and collide pop culture with science in a way that late-night television has never seen before. Weekly topics range from popular science fiction, space travel, extraterrestrial life, the Big Bang, to the future of Earth and the environment. Tyson is an astrophysicist with a gifted ability to connect with everyone, inspiring us all to to "keep looking up."
Get More National Geographic:
Official Site: bit.ly/NatGeoOf...
Facebook: bit.ly/FBNatGeo
Twitter: bit.ly/NatGeoTw...
Instagram: bit.ly/NatGeoInsta
About National Geographic:
National Geographic is the world's premium destination for science, exploration, and adventure. Through their world-class scientists, photographers, journalists, and filmmakers, Nat Geo gets you closer to the stories that matter and past the edge of what's possible.
Is Iron Man’s Arc Reactor Possible? | StarTalk
• Is Iron Man’s Arc Reac...
National Geographic
/ natgeo
TONY STARK WAS ABLE TO BUILD THIS IN A CAVE!!
.....
WITH A BOX OF SCRAPS!!
it's called a fucking movie
(insert tie-flip as best moment in whole movie)
davidsirmons I’m so happy someone else catches it in that scene!! 😂😂
Underated
Well im sorry, Im not Tony Stark
Iron Monger: "TONY STARK BUILT THIS IN A CAVE, WITH A BOX OF SCRAPS!"
Neil: "I'm sorry sir, but I'm not Tony Stark."
LOL
Exactly.
Laurus
True that boiii
Dam that's sad they can't build an arc reactor and upgrade a suit with high tech computers electricity motors sheets and sheets of metal cutter flames rawer energy absorbers everything they could need and they can't build it and tony stark can build it in a cave with a box of his weapons scrap metal little tubes and spinning trash and he built a suit that broke him out of a terrorists zone
He's applying our current technology's rules to futuristic tech. Of course, Tony was able to find a way around the heat problem. That's like someone from the 18th century saying fast cars are impossible because wooden wheels will break with that much rotation per minute.
Anonymous was there a calendar in the movie that indicated this.
Tom Foolery
I’m not entirely sure that’s a fair comparison, but I agree. One day we’ll get there! There’re few things impossible. Only problem is time, it is our biggest obstacle.
with the difference that we are not even close of building that kind of technology..let alone on that small of a scale.. so with that said he is just being realistic and separates the reality from the marvel fiction.. :)
You made a fantastic point.👏👏
what if tony stark made it to where the arch reactor was able to create an inter dimension void where all the heat goes, or its pulling power from an energy well created from itself
The first computer was super huge and bulky and had storage of like 5MB or something. Now we have 1TB hard drives, which are way smaller. If that was possible, then arc reactor could be possible.
It makes sense right.
Just like the evolution from lightbulbs to LED lights
Ya we aren’t evolving enough we ain’t even using 72% of the earth energy which is 0.02% from 1973. If we used 100% of the earth energy that would be much more possible and if we started using the suns energy then we’d have a tiny stark by now
It's all possible, the powers that be just need to figure out a way that they can monetize it while keeping other technologies suppressed.
1tb hard drives arent as hot as an arc reactor make it ur self if u think its possible
Keep in mind the Arc reactor tech didn't start out small. In the first movie it was a giant thing requiring a huge building to control.
And Tony miniaturized it out of sheer desperation.
God damit thermal law of unconventional energy
Thermal law of inconvenient energy
Without it, life as we know it would cease to function.
Sil3nt Kn1ght let them freeze to death
what happens here is that the nuclear energy, that is the radiation is being directly converted into electrical thereby not creating heat as a bit product due to the radiation not sticking around to a larger extent. neil is approaching this with a conventional power plant law. which is something that harnesses the heat from the radiation or something like a tokomak which gets the plasma to the sun's temperature. in the arc reactor what were seeing is something like a fission process (not fusion) where the electrons from the radiation are siphoned through the ark into electrical and the neutrons are fused with sacrificial materials on the inside of the reactor who probably take the neutrons and fuse dispersing more electrons in the process and form more energy.
@@unadultratedtrini Nope. Tyson is just talking about heat loss due to inefficiency. Even solar panels and wind turbines generate heat due to inefficiencies like electrical resistance etc. Considering the massive power densities that the arc reactor delivers, even a 1% inefficiency would vaporize Tony Stark.
Keep in mind that in the MCU , no one was able to replicate the Arc reactor , not even top engineers or governments around the world. Maybe the technology is possible , we just don't have anyone smart enough to discover it.
MIT are building a large-scale one. It doesn't melt because is uses magnets to make sure the cations never come into contact with the sides of the tokamak.
@@psylo786 there’s also the rise in superconductors, conductors that don’t have electrical resistance, meaning that none of the electricity transfers to heat mid-transfer.
i never see that turbien can also distribute to the main electriccity. if the energy not distribute it will goes to the battry than the battry must be fully recharge so ark reactor plan is must be a battry that have a big volta and capacity. its like rraktor fusi but tiny. and its imposible coz the output is hazzard
It was replicated by whiplash
One tends to say that when they have no idea how physics or chemistry works. MCU is as fictional as star wars. And it's impossible to create an ARC reactor with a new element, as much as it's impossible going faster than the light. Please study real science. Then talk.
The closest thing you can get is a replica.
Dang, thought he would say yes.
if he said yes, we should have iron man flying everywhere now
TartThread61 The Ark reactor is fiction,however there could be another way...small jet engines.;they are using them now for small gliders.
Galvin ..with Arc Reactor thrust level is redundant as it can lift anything. Let me hear you talk like that about Jet engines...
Path Finder What's with the hate?
+Galvin Stanley no hate bro, it's just a sarcastic way of saying "Jet engines have thrust issues"
Peace
Arc reactor can produce power, you just need to draw away the heat or use the heat as an additional power source.
Just because we can't figure it out now, does not mean we won't have a Tony Stark at a future date to do so
Jacob Star i doubt we would be able to use it but yeah hopefully we can channel it away
you cannot use the rejected heat as power, it is a law in thermodynamics
It's not that it gives off heat as an additional energy source, the heat IS the energy that was in the arc but dissipates due to the 2LOT. Furthermore this energy dissipated was not given off in fusion but the energy put into the reactor to start it up.
oldcowbb not in the same system dude. Can harness it using other systems, making it primary source of energy ,not rejected!! It's not of no use after rejection from one system. Systems pass, energy is eternal
Santosh Shirsath energy is eternal, useful energy isn't
There's always a way, it's just a matter of figuring it out.
Unless while just storing the heat energy, we should convert it back to electrical energy, if im right, thats what the copper lining are, the react the heat and place it back to the core itself?
Whoever figures THAT OUT is gonna be insanely rich 😎😎😏😏
Mahir Baksh what about S. E. G. Searle Effect Generator........lol nah just kidding.
You're absolutely right. All that this task takes is a mastermind group of people, where each one of the members is an exceptional thinker, with a chief aim in mind, obsessively determined to make it happen.
J P I’m down if you’re down
Just think about all the smart phones and smart gadgets with batteries we have now a days. How HOT they can get by just using them for longer period of time or doing multiple tasks / watching videos etc.. You can feel the heat on your hand from that tiny little battery sitting behind a cover. An Arc Reactor can be 1000s of times more powerful than those tiny batteries, how much heat will it produce?
*Neil is right!*
As for gadgets, it's not the battery that makes it hot, it's the processing units. Of course the batteries gets hot but not to a point that it even comes close to the heat generation of CPUs.
Batteries in electric cars, however, are probably the better example. Of course, the idea is the same but it's good to know some facts revolving around it.
@@faultline3936 they're the same batteries, the difference is the scale, the power in/out.
The Arc Reactor can't exist without super conductors, there's just no way.
@@glenwaldrop8166 arch reactor will violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics thus it can't exist. It doesn't matter how technology advances we simply can't surpass nature
@@wonderfullife5665 all I'm saying is the arc reactor *requires* some kind of super conductor to exist and Tyson stopped at that point. If you're going to discuss fictional tech you have to accept some portion of the rules of that universe. First rule would be accepting that a fundamental requirement of the tech was met.
He basically just said it's impossible, which is true but why even bother if you're going to dismiss it on the first point?
His ego can absorb absolutely anything
first name is that a bad thing? (Not trynah be rude)
That Arc Reactor could just his being an egotistical maniac.
Are we talking about NDT or Tony Stark?
The new element created by Tony stark in movie can absorb this tremendous energy generated by Arc reactor...... literally Tony is awesome!!!..👍😘
, 😂😂nice
The reactor is actually reversed engineered from the tesseract, an infinity stone.
Howard Stark's understanding of pym particals (based on attempts to recreate pym's formula) can also play a part.
So basically arc reactor is alien technology, in a sense?
@@jeremyg2236 basically yeah. but the tesseract is technically the blue infinity stone. Called "The Space-Stone". It and the other Infinity Stones basically made up all of existence; Time,Reality,Power,Mind,Soul/-Stone.
i never thought that way ☠☠
We must find a way to distribute the power to different necessary places equally and not produce too much to melt any place in the body. If that is possible then we may use it for the people with heart problems instead of anyone else donating a heart (it's not a bad thing)
The arc reactor is technically possible assuming we can discover or synthesize a material or isotope that is incredibly energetic and to be able to both react this material without accidentally causing fission via critical mass cascade and being able to harness all of the energy emitted, it would take ages to minituarize it to a chest reactor scale but its possible.. time will tell
renogiza - oh wow so which thing is the fuel for energy creation again!
renogiza - starks arc reactor is a fusion reactor, not a fission reactor
I was under the impression that it was a somewhat cyclical, self-perpetuating power source (hence the name 'arc'), so it's only being depleted by the energy expelled from the suit via flight & repulsor blasts. Naturally, that doesn't make any sense in the real world, but since when has that been a barrier in Hollywood?
This guy was in the Batman v Superman movie
It's clear how much he regrets it considering who his favourite superhero is.
Leslie Knope He said Batman was one of his favourites. I'm sure that played a part
I think you are thinking about Laurence fishburne
@@edddedd7740 Nah, NDGT was in BvS doing a voice over of a newscast talking about how the existence of Superman changed our view of the universe.
Perhaps Tony found a way to disperse the heat in a way that it's used to increase the energy in a cycle to a limit he installed.
Hence the circular appearance.
Tyler James haha....that thing is too small to circulate heat. And it'll be producing a lot of heat.
Tyler James there is no way to create arc reactor because there is no fuel to generate the energy in that reactor
the fuel wouldnt be a problem according to e=mc^2 '
little mass can produce an enormous amount of energy.
if only we knew how to harvest the energy in small steps...
heat is energy. He must've found a way to reuse that very heat and turn it from a byproduct into an energy supplement, kinda like hybrid cars use regenerative braking to charge the battery... hence why the arc reactors can provide that much power for THAT LONG... we just don't know how turn turn heat back into energy
Stop making conclusion from a fiction. Nothing make sense!
And you will hate me because you don't even get my point! Haha
we would need to find an element or elements when mixed, can be able to counteract the heat produced by the energy
It's called ununpentium.
Dimond?
@@Dino-pq9bj nope
@@snakeplissken1583 You mean moscovium?
All we need now is an AI named Ultron to turn evil.
Comic boy67 and we are pretty GD close to that.
Comic boy67 that and also 6 powerful stones and an gauntlet-glove
Comic boy67 Zuckerberg has got our back for that.
We are IF I know right, just like 100 year away. Very close (sarcasm)
Lol Most Probably AI would watch Age of Ultron & Name itself Ultron
The laws of thermodynamics also apply to the laws of general physics, if you draw out all of the kinetic energy of an object no matter how hot it is it will cool down all the way to absolute zero.
renogiza - do you even know what you saying?
Fun Fact: The Arc Reactor appears blue due to the same phenomenon that makes Dr. Manhattan glow blue- Cherenkov Radiation. Also, ARC stands for 'Affordable, Robust Compact'.
I would like to just point that you cannot cool something down to literally absolute zero - but just close to it.
Since we don't know diddly about dark energy maybe arc reactor is made of dark matter hence heat it radiates dissipates into the unknown. That could be a comic book origin storyline as well since it is fantasy theory as well so far.
It was powered by paladium
You can say tony designed The arc reactor to not generate a lot of power while it’s in him powering him, like a pacemaker. It’s on a minimal setting and dissipates heat through his chest and the open metal sides with some water cooling or something. When the suits on, there’s a major water forced cooling system or something like that
Count chocula the Heat generated in the arc reactor is insane. It would take more than 50 conventional radiators spread over at least two basketball courts at ambient room temperature and pump the size of a washing machine , and 500L reservoir coolant to cool it down or even more.
the energy tony uses doesnt generate heat, hes talking ac. thermal dynamics is a by product of the way we think energy is created. inside the arc reactor the copper acts as a coolant, those are the blocks you see in every depiction. when he melts the piladium and makes rings, im assuming to hold a charge and reaction with the later design he uses a solid piece piladium for a stronger reaction and longer charge.
I can't cool down my graphic card forget about arc reactor!!!
It can be made though on a smaller scale, doesn't need to be a nuclear reactor attached on your chest, but to produce energy like lithium battery is good
A lithium battery doesn't produce energy, just storage it
I don't know what cold fusion is, but it sounds like it could solve this problem.
It's a hypothetical reaction which means it can't be implemented 😒
If it was real then oh boy could we solve many problems
Solving the thermodynamics problem would be creating a room temperature superconductor. As for energy Einstein equation of E=MC^2 backs up the theory of a material/object small as the arc reactor producing the insane amount energy. All is left a really smart person to create and apply this new material.
ai will probably be that really smart person
A magnetic anti matter storage unit equiped with the means to turn gama rays into usable energy and distribute it would EASILY fit the properties portrayed of the arc reactor. Then again, if it were ever crushed like in "civil war" the whole planet would quite literally go kabloom.
okay, that's hilarious what you said just now. because its possible. all you need is to create a barrier so that plasma does not touch the walls of container. as we know the plasma is negatively charged. we can create a magnetic field to keep the plasma from touching the walls. the other thing we can do is cold fusion.
so before saying anything just do some research. all we need is a good superconductor.
All those things are possible but not actually properly made nowadays. There are prototypes but as we stand now. With our technological level. It would melt for sure.
VAIBHAV X dude, can you even imagine the amount of radiation energy emitted by it? I mean, to seal it only it's gonna be a nightmare. Secondly, cold fusion only exists with a limited amount of energy. But here, we're talking about huge amount of energy, to control that much of heat, no mechanism will be able to neutralize it given the size of the reactor.
Chetan Chaudhary see to achieve that much power to hold that plasma, you will have to go through nightmares. Its not an easy task. There is no chance of radiation if you contain it.
VAIBHAV X you don't even know what you're saying, do you?
fitrian hidayat ya i know ! I am Sorry if you don’t understand English
at 00:47 . "nuclear". Clearly the woman knows nothing
Lee You Ren lol, she doesn't even know who batman is
"nuclear..."
"Any kind of power plant"
"uh huh..."
I laughed too hard😂😂😂
Lee You Ren you obviously didn’t see what was written under her name.
U
Just don't mention the fact that Tony created a completely new element. So the argument is mute as no-one knows what properties that element has.
Take away "tal" from "StarTalk" and you get... "Stark". Boom! Mind blown.
Never knew such a complicated question can have can a simple answer, just beautiful
yeah, simply NO :)
It appears the energy is stored in the plasma. Assuming fusion works conventionally then it should be self contained in magnetic fields induced from charged particles moving around.
Wow! Interesting that I have something in common with Tyson. I have always been a much greater admirer of the more human heroes in comics than those with superpowers as well. You can see yourself in those characters much more than the more fantasy-based ones.
Neil: it's impossible.
Trump: tony stark built this in a cave with scraps!
Neil:sorry, Im not tony stark.
brian wong what does trump have to do with this?
Dumb.
"TONY STARK BUILT THAT IN A CAVE, WITH A BUNCH OF SCRAP".
I would answer that question in a very different way. First form and function of his reactor requires a completely different definition of what a reactor is and what type of reactor is actually in his chest. Remember fireflies produce a vary high number of lumens without producing any heat. And what type of reactor is being viewed when looking at the reactor that is actually in his chest? Once those questions are answered then we may proceed with the rest of the equation that is Tony Stark heart.
Also, has no one asked why The Arc Reactor is not melting or vibrating so hard it will melt tony's chest? If we consider logic, no metal that thin would be able to protect his chest from heat and vibration from a nuclear reactor, especially one that small.
Rip Ironman love you 3000!!!!
but he made it with cold fusion which won't melt anything
Flash85 71 then it would freeze anything, right?
cold fusion mean it can still fuse while it has low energy state which mean it can fuse at low temperature which mean you can produce huge amount of energy in a low temperature.
if you produce that much of energy , you have to remove it or capture it somehow else it will explode instantly like a nuclear weapon
Flash85 71 cold compared to regular fusion but it's still pretty high.
you sure?! whats his fuel then?!
Can vibranium be a form of metal (captain america shield)
Yes it's metal!
Yeah with Adamantium
EDZIB the real life equivalent is D3o
graphene would be close to the claimed specifications of Fictional vibranium , if they did a solid 2 inch wide shield of graphene , good luck going through that a 50 bmg bullet wont even scratch it
of course it wouldnt be as strong as the fictional vibranium is said to be , but it would be the closest you can get in real life
when a asteroid from outter space hits earth with that material then yes
basically, a nuclear fusion reactor can hold 100 million celsius degree with magnetic field. probably arc reactor should have similar technology.
3 gigajoule per second is supposedly the energy generated from the arc reactor. which is pretty much the same as the energy fields producing in USA, which is around 3.3 gigajoulee, sooo the answer is still NO, to whatever questions related to: Is the arc reactor even remotely possible? NO, NO AND A BIG NO!
Why need to cool the heat with coolant? Try converting the heat to electricity
suddenly thought of Doc Ock's line about the "power of the sun" while watching this.
Wow! Seeing Jason Silva after a long time!
My thoughts are..
We have managed to store terabytes in small sd cards in just a few years. Dont think it will take long until we have a powerfull portable & small fusion reactor. The thing is what we think we know, the military is already 10-20 years ahead of us.
That's a good perspective 👍 Totally makes sense
when i get old i wanna be like neil...he's a chill guy
chill my ass.
ok
Exactly. You would be producing that much energy. Supposing that you are able to produce this technology in a finalized stage like that, you should be smart enough to make a counter measure for all of that heat produced. Anyone with intelligence to create this kind of reactor should be able to produce a cooling system that is powerful enough to oppose the said possibility that everything in its range would melt.
Aaron Angeles
Why oppose it? Flow with it, use it, turn the energy to your advantage.
In the break room use it to instantly heat up water for tea. Endless hot showers.... Lol.
Seriously, put it on a cold as planet like Pluto and we've got a great source of heat, energy etc...to make living on a planet viable. Got heat, will travel!
@@rxonmymind8362 People often like to entertain their thoughs with ideas about things they dont' fully understand or at all. I challenge you to channel YOUR energy into something achieveable and USEFULL in your life time. That'll be something truly remarkable more than the fiction itself :)
Per the Marvel wiki:
The armor has evolved from a bulky iron suit to a highly complex matrix of molecularly-aligned fully crystallized ultra high carbon iron/steel hybrid alloy enhanced by magnetic fields over layers of other ultra hyper alloys like titanium alloy and or tungsten/vanadium alloys reinforced with carbon nano-tubes creating a shell that is pliable, yet capable of amazingly high resilience and protection. Most of his armor are powered by a combination of solar converters, electrical batteries and an on-board generator that uses beta particle absorption as a fuel source.The armor is also able to absorb and convert nearby or far away energy sources, such as heat, solar, electrical, magnetic, geo-thermal or kinetic energy or energy from the planet itself into electricity, or even drain energy directly into the batteries for recharge.
Heat consumption for any electronic device has been for many years the main problem when it comes to nanotechnology holding a large amount of energy. However I still think its possible.
My actual issue with the arc reactor is where it's positioned.Its right in the centre of his Rib Cage which should be ridiculously painful and even impossible right???
I'm on my third run through the MCU. This time I am rewatching the saga from the point of view of Tony Stark. The first time I watched it it really his character really bugged me from Civil War on. This time around I'm seeing the story of the birth and growth of a hero who is trying to atone for the mistakes of his past, a hero who is destined to die. It's like the ending of Robin Hood where he finally wins only to die in the last story.
is Vibranium & adamantium possible?
myles Wu
No.
Not the exact metal being portrayed in the film, but with the advances in technology creating such alloys can be in similarity to vibranium and adamantium, So no, but creating something similar can be done by composing the different properties and forming/combining the metals together!
myles Wu yes.
But not on earth
myles Wu as metals currently no but there is D3o that absorbs all impacts.
Graphene is the nearest we can get..i guess?
It's possible just need to distribute the energy in space time continuum by that way distributed energy can be used very efficiently and in different time frame.
One of the great challenges... my favorite Nel frase.
Well we just have to get rid the law of thermodynamic
Even though he is correct under our current technology and understanding of thermodynamics, the arc reactor was created based off of the energy that came from the tesseract, which housed the space stone, an elemental crystal created from the Big Bang (MCU story of the arc reactor) so we really don't have any understanding of the energy contained within the stone or how it's stored and works. We also have no idea what kind of power it is. So it's just one of those things that we can't really say whether or not is possible because we don't have anything like the infinity stones, that we know of.
I think Neil actually kind of dodged the question because he REALLY didn't want to have to explain the complexities of what it would take to make it reality,.......... that, or he's secretly working for the government.
There might have been cooling properties to counteract the heat like that force field stuff we saw on droids in star wars revenge of the sith during Anakin and Obi Wans fight on Mustafar. That was vital to keep the droids that close to the lava without melting.
Maybe it can be possible, more likely how much energy is made and how much is the maximun energy made... May be, we don't understand the ark reactor from Tony, it could be absorbing that heat energy to be more efficient
necessity is the mother of all inventions
Idea: the reactor isn't always full blast, and most of the time puts out just enough to keep his heart safe.
TONY STARK WAS ABLE TO BUILD THIS IN A CAVE, WITH A BOX OF SCRAPS
good explanation. loved it.
Without that thing that makes us unable to do it, like the law, we would be able to
My problem with the arc reactor is that Tony originally built it to keep shrapnel out of his heart, right? But with the power coming out of that thing, the shrapnel should have ripped right through his chest like metallic objects around an MRI. Then later on, he gets surgery to remove the shrapnel, and now the 4” hole in his chest is gone? What?
He was about to say that Batman doesn't not develop his own stuff
arc reactor is a multi isotope radio decay cell in which high energy particles in a circular UR curve path move in a rapid speed due to magnetic field through an electromagnet.Made with palladium which is activated with Newton bombardment..
cold fusion reactor:- no harmful radiation
heat generated is moderate sometines low sometimes high.
if you know how yo control cold fusion then arc reactor can made
Maybe I am off base but aerogel internal shielding might be able to not allow the heat transfer. It shouldn't need replenishing like coolants do, it's practically weightless also. If the brittle nature is undesired then the other bendable pliable version could be used instead like nanotube or graphine aerogel.
You gotta make it cool to avoid the heat and melting
People often like to entertain their thoughs with ideas about things they dont' fully understand or at all. I challenge you to channel YOUR energy into something achieveable and USEFULL in your life time. That'll be something truly remarkable more than the fiction itself :)
Let people enjoy with their imagination junior
For now it is fiction, who knows what humanity could achieve decades from now. You must be a fun guy
i loved tony stark and Neil argue about the ark reactor.
You mean, the drug dealer who was let out of prison because it was full?
Tony Stark has Arc Reactor to supply power for Powerful Blow, but doesn't have a suit that's strong enough
Batman has a suit that's strong enough but he doesn't have an Arc Reactor to power his suit
The same thing that edison said about transmission of electricity through wires until Tesla came around.
I don't know why most physicists live in denial of the possibility of discovery or invention. It's like they don't want to admit that something they can't figure out exists out there.
PEOPLE HAVING INTELECT LIKE TONY STARK CAN MAKE IT .WE ALL ARE NOT STARK. BUT TO ME IT IS POSSIBLE TO MAKE. PROBABLY NOT SO MODIFIED .BUT STILL WE NEED TO KEEP ON .THE WORLD IS REALLY IN NEED OF SUCH A PERSON.
He has a point, to me, there's still some secret in how tony built the arc reactor,
It's more fun to create something , when everybody says its impossible
He never said it's impossible
He just explained how it works
NDT just explained the dynamics of Ultra Instinct Goku
I think it can be made.
Plz contact me on my email mehulkapadia15@gmail.com
maybe, in 1000 years
ok
Mehul Kapadia I think you can turn into a flying pig.....
Mehul Kapadia you are right bhai
it's pretty hard to get a word in with Neil
Perhaps the heat it produces powers the suit but that doesn't explain how Tonys chest doesn't melt when he sleeps.
Tony is so cool that he doesn’t need any cooling equipment to cool down his reactor core.
Maybe the arc reactor cancels out it's own heat? :Thinking:
Bat boys are like "what? What did you say, i don't like you anymore Neil" hahahaha
Can't this be something like cold nuclear fusion?
Is Jurassic park's dinosaurs possible?
Well, since we can't get actual non-avian dinosaur DNA, not as it's portrayed in the film (and yes, I'm aware that we found TRACES of T-rex DNA inside a femur, but with that you can't clone anything), what we cand do for now though, is making birds look like non-avian dinosaurs by supressing the gens that supress the developing of a snout, tail and fingers and modify its posture (Jack Horner is working on that, look out for his "chicken-o-saurus")
We technically can, but we need dinasour dna, which is going to extremely difficult, if not impossible, since it has to be preserved very well for 60+ million years
There will be always a way
I would like to hear Elon answer this question think he would say yes and give a good explanation as to how he is going to do it in the next decade
Unless the heat is being converted to energy thats utilized at a rapid rate or it's a form of cold fusion.
so did you solve the heating problem?
my 1st question is how do we store the energy of the atom bomb in the shell of the bomb
Dude inside atom bomb( before detonation) there's just a system waiting for a signal to start nuclear fission to release tremendous amount of energy
In other words it's just mass inside it initially , then as soon as u detonate mass converts into energy
isn't the triangle thing was for in iron man 2 to absorb heat.
No it was a new element. Like I said in another comment it means that this discussion means nothing as we don't know the properties of this element.
We are IF
We know it's not actually real.
And we know that to contain that much energy in that small a space whatever properties it has had to violate the laws of physics in some way.,
And it is a LOT of energy. It lasts a long time and he flies many thousands of miles including breaking the sound barrier. Not to mention using the control thrusters in his gloves as weapons. We're talking the energy equivalent of many tens if thousands of gallons of jet fuel at least and probably more like hundreds of thousands.
arindam Remo It wasnt chemical he was having palladium poisoning. That triangle thing is a new metal he found that is not radioactive but still produces energy? I dont know if that is possible in real life but okay
Probably vibranium.
Whatisbow 28 No it wasnt vibranium it was some other not radioactive material that produces energy i dont know the name of it..
it's possible if we could only discover a new element from space that could produce that much energy
Is that guy beside the girl from Brain Games?
im not going to reveal how this could be made and no I'm not cappin' I'm serious all ill tell you people is that I've found a way to make a prismatic accelerator and it seems possible
Which show is it?
Thank you.
I think it’s possible
so when we give an AC to the arc reactor, i mean we transfer the heat to somewhere else, would the power transfer to somewhere else to?