It’s on this one (audio) at around 10:17 and if you keep listening Paul also mutters something again right at the end too (but I can’t quite catch it) ua-cam.com/video/a_VWkHGiBW8/v-deo.html
Still one of my favorite interviews only because it's shot so well. Real clarity here in the visual. To bad the audio is only so so. 1966 is such a monumental year for them. Just amazing.
@@sophiafake-virus2456 He must have worn contact lenses around that time, still. They only had hard contact lenses in those days, which can be quite uncomfortable (i speak from experience). It appears that they hurted him too, as one can see that he blinks often during these press conferences
2:49 Man, John sounds pissed for some reason. "Yeah, but it's only an advertisement. it's just us with some meat. That's all it is. Look at it again. It's just a picture of us with some meat!" Hmmm
Hello! I was wondering if you might have the full audio recording of this press conference, or if you know where I may be able to find it? Thank you so much for this previously unseen footage... it's in such nice shape and it's so vivid!
I dare anyone to tackle their pre-fame schedule let alone their fame and still be as remotely together as they were here, exhausted of it and with enough FY money to tell it all to FO, thems the apples
“How many girls have you had in Hamburg?” They’re not going to answer that! By this point, they were all either married or dating people ... you don’t talk about the groupies on TV.
By 66 they were so tired of the mania and the same questions over and over again. And when the new question is ‘why are you so horrid snobby’ you wind up with a video of what really drove them apart. And I’m not even mad about it. It’s how it happened and their story is epic so what’s to get mad at
Yes, I agree, but I just bought an original copy of Rubber Soul, from the year before and the greatness had already started there. (they had already done brilliant stuff but they began a new phase from Rubber Soul)
This band came from Liverpool but it was made in Hamburg. Had they never had their invaluable performing experience in Germany, they’d never have been any good.
"...any good."? After emerging from Hamburg's crucible they took on the world. Epstein put them in front of the right audiences and sheer talent and their individual appeal achieved the rest. For example, who today can name all the members of the Searchers, Jerry and the Pacemakers, Herman's Hermits ... ?
Will never understand the press in thinking they’re entitled. These interviews around this time showed just how tired The Beatles were with inane questions. They were growing leaps and bounds.
They all looked tired. When you see these little excerpts, you can imagine that they were fed up with that kind of touring with all these screaming chicks without any interest in music. To me the tragic of the Beatles as musicians is that they didn't go on tour again only a few years later when the audience was much more mature and grown up. There is a good comparison to the Stones when they went on tour again in 1969 after a nearly 3 years break. It was a challenge to play live because the audience was suddenly listening. And I wish the Beatles would have experienced that.
Haha...did anyone else hear this? in the chaos, someone tries to tell some of them to clear out at 0:54 John says, yeah cus we've all got VD! And Paul laughs. Did I hear that right? Long before it was more PC to say STDs. lol Then some idiot asks them how many girls they've had in Hamburg? 0:58 ....even the Beatles were a little taken aback by that one. And George asks "How many have we HAD???" That's why they started not being quite so friendly. Geez
You're not alone, I heard that too :)) It's amazing how they managed to stay true to themselves and deal with their stupid questions in the best way possible. They just didn't take any shit from anyone of them and outwitted them all.
This was only the 3rd date of the tour (plus they knew straight afterwards it was on to Japan for a tour there) , and apparently their concert in Essen the night before was one of the worst they ever did.... also they were reserved about returning to Hamburg (this was their first concert there since making it big) and George was nervous about what skeletons were gong to appear out of the cupboards
Right about the time they decided it was time to withdraw to the studio and just drop acid (John certainly had already). I can understand why. Silly questions got old :)
NoyzyBoyZ3 I think at this stage they were at the top for three years...was known as beatle mania and they were tired of all the travelling here and there..watch the dvd of 8 days a week and you'll understand this better
Still no excuse to be snippy. Lennon's stupid "Jesus" remark fueled this shitty attitude on their part instead of contrition. It's called meglomania and only the Beatles got away with it. Imagine Elvis or Sinatra carrying on like this!?
waldcast c’mon! Media were all assholes with them since the beginning. These guys were barely asked about their music, always asked stupid questions about their looks, their behavior or girls. It’s like reporters couldn’t respect their talent because they were young. They had to build their own shield to protect themselves from media and at this point they were already tired of the exhausting tours and press conferences every day.
@@jaimeloeragarcia5675 Height is one of the most noticeable differences. Pre November 1966 Paul was almost the exact height as John and George, maybe an inch difference between them. After that he appears much taller in many photos and videos. I think it's most obvious in the Rooftop Concert where he clearly has a much bigger stature than the original Paul and is much taller than John. That one of the reasons they stopped touring I believe, as it would have been very noticeable on stage.
@@OldSchoolVibes1978 But, take a look to AHDN film, just at the train when they look for the grandpa and in the corridor they are shoulder to shoulder of the same height. So, Hamburg 1966 at least he isn't the real Paul. On the other hand, Munich 1966 shows the real Paul.
![[UA] NAVI проти G2 Esports | Blast Premier Fall Final](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QWlIm4FGESQ/mqdefault.jpg)
they looked so cool in 1966
gaz riley
Always looked cool, always...
gaz riley I agree!!!
Oh yes.
@@neptunestardust But especially in 66
@@gazriley624 John is gorgeous here
This video misses Paul’s wonderful answer to the “horrid snobby” question.
jemimallah hell yeah!
It’s on this one (audio) at around 10:17 and if you keep listening Paul also mutters something again right at the end too (but I can’t quite catch it)
ua-cam.com/video/a_VWkHGiBW8/v-deo.html
They were kind of snobby. We're the same as you except we're Rich? The prodigal Sons returning to where it all began.
"Because, we are not flattering you?". Great answer by Lennon.
The way George smiles 😻🤗😘🥰
Gets me every time
Gorgeous.
He has a beautiful smile ❤
Still one of my favorite interviews only because it's shot so well. Real clarity here in the visual. To bad the audio is only so so. 1966 is such a monumental year for them. Just amazing.
It was quite a transition year! For the world!
they are pissy because the questions are just dumb and rude
They were well over it at this stage
Exactly! They had it. I can really see why they finally said screw this crap lol. I mean 3 or 4 yrs of that is a long time!
The Beatles should have told Epstein to do the Press Conferences himself.
John was so handsome and beautiful!!😍💕
And to quote George, blind as a bat.
@@sophiafake-virus2456 He must have worn contact lenses around that time, still. They only had hard contact lenses in those days, which can be quite uncomfortable (i speak from experience). It appears that they hurted him too, as one can see that he blinks often during these press conferences
Colin Unwin, you mean
Johns eyes look so tiring.
tired
No glasses.
"prellies'' can only get you so far.
This "John" is Gary Gibson.
2:49 Man, John sounds pissed for some reason. "Yeah, but it's only an advertisement. it's just us with some meat. That's all it is. Look at it again. It's just a picture of us with some meat!"
Hmmm
Is Paul acknowledging girls? @ 0:03 and he keeps glancing back and mentions someone by the name of Fiona. haha
Casanova to the T
this is in reference to the Beatles Butcher album
@@HannahFaith69 I think in this situation he's acknowledging a reporter they've met before.
Top band, always been ...
Cool, patient,, politie yet funny with the boring press.
@0:32 Paul: "Hi, Fiona." Female reporter: "What?"
did he say it to her?
Hello! I was wondering if you might have the full audio recording of this press conference, or if you know where I may be able to find it? Thank you so much for this previously unseen footage... it's in such nice shape and it's so vivid!
I dare anyone to tackle their pre-fame schedule let alone their fame and still be as remotely together as they were here, exhausted of it and with enough FY money to tell it all to FO, thems the apples
00:25 John continuing the tried and true British tradition of taking the piss out of Germans for the war.
“How many girls have you had in Hamburg?” They’re not going to answer that! By this point, they were all either married or dating people ... you don’t talk about the groupies on TV.
You can tell that they're getting really fed up with press conferences by this time.
By 66 they were so tired of the mania and the same questions over and over again. And when the new question is ‘why are you so horrid snobby’ you wind up with a video of what really drove them apart. And I’m not even mad about it. It’s how it happened and their story is epic so what’s to get mad at
1966 was their greatest year for writing music. Revolver, the singles Paperback Writer, Day Tripper, We Can Work It Out, Rain...best time.
Yes, I agree, but I just bought an original copy of Rubber Soul, from the year before and the greatness had already started there.
(they had already done brilliant stuff but they began a new phase from Rubber Soul)
This band came from Liverpool but it was made in Hamburg. Had they never had their invaluable performing experience in Germany, they’d never have been any good.
"...any good."? After emerging from Hamburg's crucible they took on the world. Epstein put them in front of the right audiences and sheer talent and their individual appeal achieved the rest. For example, who today can name all the members of the Searchers, Jerry and the Pacemakers, Herman's Hermits ... ?
What a redicolous statement!
MAYBE!! We’ll never know for sure.
Not true. They played a lot in Britain. Also I think talent like that would not be denied.
They had come a long ways in 5 years.
I don’t know how they put up with it…smart guys!
Quality is superb!
Very good persons and talented cause until today they gave good music to the world.
Que guapos, my sweet ❤️ George. 💏💕
The beatles x siempre y x el tiempo que m keda de vida
Will never understand the press in thinking they’re entitled.
These interviews around this time showed just how tired The Beatles were with inane questions.
They were growing leaps and bounds.
Their so cheeky😭❤️
They all looked tired. When you see these little excerpts, you can imagine that they were fed up with that kind of touring with all these screaming chicks without any interest in music. To me the tragic of the Beatles as musicians is that they didn't go on tour again only a few years later when the audience was much more mature and grown up.
There is a good comparison to the Stones when they went on tour again in 1969 after a nearly 3 years break. It was a challenge to play live because the audience was suddenly listening. And I wish the Beatles would have experienced that.
I love George the best but I 've got to admit that he was a break for the Beatles about live performance.!
Me too. The Beatles playing with stage monitors and good PA would have been sublime.
I didn’t think Paul got Tall until 67 but lookie here!
This is the original Paul though, not Billy the replacement
@@OldSchoolVibes1978 i m not so sure that there was biological Paul.
@@OldSchoolVibes1978 Oh stop it already. Jeez...go back to believing the Earth is flat and that the Moon landings were a hoax.
@@Mozart1220 ya I know these theorists are so dumb
You can’t fix stupid.
Haha...did anyone else hear this? in the chaos, someone tries to tell some of them to clear out at 0:54 John says, yeah cus we've all got VD! And Paul laughs. Did I hear that right? Long before it was more PC to say STDs. lol Then some idiot asks them how many girls they've had in Hamburg? 0:58 ....even the Beatles were a little taken aback by that one. And George asks "How many have we HAD???" That's why they started not being quite so friendly. Geez
You're not alone, I heard that too :)) It's amazing how they managed to stay true to themselves and deal with their stupid questions in the best way possible. They just didn't take any shit from anyone of them and outwitted them all.
In all fairness they were being a little snobby but they were human and the questions they got asked were repetitive
“Only in your mind we are” Owned
Some of the questions were really rude.
Glad they stopped being so public in '66. Idiotic press conferences got more idiotic.
They look tired of touring here. I can understand the "horrid snobby" question, many of their answers were curt.
This was only the 3rd date of the tour (plus they knew straight afterwards it was on to Japan for a tour there) , and apparently their concert in Essen the night before was one of the worst they ever did.... also they were reserved about returning to Hamburg (this was their first concert there since making it big) and George was nervous about what skeletons were gong to appear out of the cupboards
The questions are stupid af thats why so are you
Well only give our numbers! Classic Lennon
Right about the time they decided it was time to withdraw to the studio and just drop acid (John certainly had already).
I can understand why. Silly questions got old :)
Very good.
They were all fine until the questions started getting nasty. Who could blame them
:55 ''Yes, we've all got VD"
It's Billy Shears.
Based on height you have to wonder if this was early Bill and not bio Paul.
It’s the original PAUL!! ALL THE WAY UP, UNTILL THIS VERY SECOND!!
They looked pissed in here. Lennon always have that stupid answer just because of a stupid question😂
Paul McCartney
18/06/1942
79 años (80)
John y Paul que hombres tan bellossssss muy sexys
1:32 "tell them johnny!" 😅
0:30 Ringo, Paul, Bill Wyman, John.
ah ah! yes there's something!!
1962-1963 george looked like keith richards. 1965-1966 george looked like bill wyman
Paul must have been gone by then. That is definitely William.
Willaim was getting his surgeries in the fall of 1966 in Nirobi, Kenya. They began recording Sgt. Peppers in early 1967.
@@chrisnolan5607 I agree, but most can't see the difference. It's a shame.
You guys really need to get back on your meds.
@@Mozart1220 Or perhaps you need an eye exam.
Fun fact Hamburg home of the hamburger
Wigs for the featles
Because we're not flattering you 😂🍻
“It’s just us w/ some meat” 😂
is this hamburg '66 ?
Not sure. What led you to that assumption?
@@brackobalm6457 Title perhaps.
“How many girls have you had in Hamburg?” George: “What do you mean ‘had’?” Oh come on, Georgie, you know what they’re implying, lol
That question changed the whole mood of the interview.
John said that not george
@@SamSam-rs8moit was George.
“How many girls have you had here in Hamburg ? WTF !
Lennon: "Only your Mother" (I wish he'd said it)
OH look. It's Billy. Look at the ear lobes, they're attached. The real Pauls' weren't.
No this isn't Billy it's original Paul. Billy didn't turn up until the November of '66
That's different! They all seem to have to have a bit of an attitude for some reason.Being snobby?
Because they were in the position to tell the media to go eat shit.
NoyzyBoyZ3 I think at this stage they were at the top for three years...was known as beatle mania and they were tired of all the travelling here and there..watch the dvd of 8 days a week and you'll understand this better
Still no excuse to be snippy. Lennon's stupid "Jesus" remark fueled this shitty attitude on their part instead of contrition. It's called meglomania and only the Beatles got away with it. Imagine Elvis or Sinatra carrying on like this!?
waldcast c’mon! Media were all assholes with them since the beginning. These guys were barely asked about their music, always asked stupid questions about their looks, their behavior or girls. It’s like reporters couldn’t respect their talent because they were young. They had to build their own shield to protect themselves from media and at this point they were already tired of the exhausting tours and press conferences every day.
waldcast they got away with it because they did have that much fame and success. They're musically much better period.
Still the original Paul here. He wasn't around much longer after this. Much preferred Paul to Billy the replacement...
You are an idiot.
@@sacluvsBM No, you're naive and brsinwashed
@@OldSchoolVibes1978 you tell him. The moon landings were fake too and the world is run by lizards. So many brsinwashed people out there.
@OldSchoolVibes 1978 I dunno-I kinda like 'Billy' better. Hope that's okay..
Grown up.
Whadeya whadeya 😂😂
Vy are you all so horrid snobby 😂 could come straight out of Allo Allo
Check out Epstein in the shades!
That´s where you´ll always find the jew!
Billy looks more like Paul in many pictures, then Paul.
panzerwerfer, Can you notice? Paul is taller than John when they are stand up acordin to the white line behind all of them
This isn't Billy though, it's original Paul. Billy didn't turn up till November '66 and looked nothing like original Paul originally.
@@OldSchoolVibes1978 How you can explain? that he is taller than John
@@jaimeloeragarcia5675 Height is one of the most noticeable differences. Pre November 1966 Paul was almost the exact height as John and George, maybe an inch difference between them. After that he appears much taller in many photos and videos. I think it's most obvious in the Rooftop Concert where he clearly has a much bigger stature than the original Paul and is much taller than John. That one of the reasons they stopped touring I believe, as it would have been very noticeable on stage.
@@OldSchoolVibes1978 But, take a look to AHDN film, just at the train when they look for the grandpa and in the corridor they are shoulder to shoulder of the same height. So, Hamburg 1966 at least he isn't the real Paul. On the other hand, Munich 1966 shows the real Paul.
Three Cool Cats and Ringo mf'ing Starr. Love them all.
Aw come on, Ringo is a brilliant drummer, ask any drummer.