The mysteries of the elusive F-117 Nighthawk

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 299

  • @Interestingengineeringofficial
    @Interestingengineeringofficial  7 місяців тому

    ⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out!
    *SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE

  • @lemmythebulldog8812
    @lemmythebulldog8812 2 роки тому +105

    1977 and still looks like a futuristic fighter plane

    • @evanaja8658
      @evanaja8658 Рік тому

      1975's hopeless diamond project began.

    • @kwikd5193
      @kwikd5193 11 місяців тому +1

      A turkey could fly better tho

  • @exist
    @exist 3 роки тому +151

    Still to this day, one of the best looking Aircrafts ever built.

    • @amoskouame5608
      @amoskouame5608 2 роки тому +2

      It was an awesome technology ...

    • @robertdawg4754
      @robertdawg4754 2 роки тому +3

      It was ugly af

    • @vxyz5219
      @vxyz5219 Рік тому +3

      @@robertdawg4754 You're one of the few I've seen to think so. How is it ugly?

    • @Cinoth
      @Cinoth Рік тому +2

      It's all in the eye of the beholder.

    • @Powerof7even
      @Powerof7even Рік тому +2

      @@vxyz5219 It's an odd shape, I wouldn't say ugly myself but I can see how people see the flat front and prism cockpit as ugly. I personally think it's cool as fuck though.

  • @herbertkeithmiller
    @herbertkeithmiller Рік тому +27

    The F-117 earned a nickname from the Saudi Arabians who worked beside it in operation desert storm
    alshabah, the Ghost.
    Which I think is one of the coolest nicknames of what airplane ever.

  • @SinSGone
    @SinSGone Рік тому +10

    I just saw one yesterday 2-16-23. Good to see them flying.

  • @adithyansunil1153
    @adithyansunil1153 2 роки тому +15

    man Lockheed surely knows how to build good jets, the f22 raptor, f117 nighthawk, SR 71 blackbird, and the hypersonic darkstar in top gun maverick 🔥🔥🔥

    • @AlVil
      @AlVil Рік тому

      northtrop grumman are much better

    • @daviedood2503
      @daviedood2503 Рік тому

      Skunk works designed dark star 🤨

    • @silverscientists8130
      @silverscientists8130 7 місяців тому

      Also the legendary p 38 lightning that started skunk works

    • @eac1235
      @eac1235 6 місяців тому

      ​@@daviedood2503Skunk Works is part of Lockheed, always has been.

  • @zelmansamuel2072
    @zelmansamuel2072 6 місяців тому +2

    It really made me sad. When I heard about the Night Hawks retirement. I know it was not in service. . But the narrator said it. It made me sad.

  • @Genieprep
    @Genieprep 3 роки тому +16

    That is pretty amazing. Engineering at its finest!

  • @OiVinn-eq1ml
    @OiVinn-eq1ml Рік тому +4

    One of my favorite jets. It's design & sleekness look so futuristic

  • @Samuraistar92
    @Samuraistar92 Рік тому +4

    I was engaged to one of the original engineers for this aircraft. But unfortunately he died before the wedding. He talked a lot about this airplane a lot. He worked for lockeed from about 1950s to about 1990.

  • @erichpizer1
    @erichpizer1 2 роки тому +17

    it is was and always will be a true legend . it was love at first sight for me

  • @sfsunitedspace9985
    @sfsunitedspace9985 Рік тому +12

    Anybody remember thinking that this plane looked speedy as hell but then realized it doesn’t even go half the speed of sound?

  • @abcnt
    @abcnt 4 місяці тому +1

    This was the technology they had during the late 70s.. Mind blown.

  • @baller4686
    @baller4686 Рік тому +5

    The Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk is a retired American single-seat, subsonic twin-engine stealth attack aircraft developed by Lockheed's secretive Skunk Works division and operated by the United States Air Force (USAF). It was the first operational aircraft to be designed with stealth technology.
    The F-117 was based on the Have Blue technology demonstrator. The Nighthawk's maiden flight took place in 1981 at Groom Lake, Nevada, and the aircraft achieved initial operating capability status in 1983. The aircraft was shrouded in secrecy until it was revealed to the public in 1988. Of the 64 F-117s built, 59 were production versions, with the other five being prototypes.
    The F-117 was widely publicized for its role in the Gulf War of 1991. Although it was commonly referred to as the "Stealth Fighter", it was strictly an attack aircraft. F-117s took part in the conflict in Yugoslavia, where one was shot down by a surface-to-air missile (SAM) in 1999. The U.S. Air Force retired the F-117 in April 2008, primarily due to the fielding of the F-22 Raptor.[4] Despite the type's official retirement, a portion of the fleet has been kept in airworthy condition, and Nighthawks have been observed flying since 2009.[5] AVIONICS
    The F-117 has quadruple-redundant fly-by-wire flight controls. To lower development costs, the avionics, fly-by-wire systems, and other systems and parts were derived from the General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon, Boeing B-52 Stratofortress, McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet, and McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle. The parts were originally described as spares in budgets for these aircraft, to keep the F-117 project secret.[citation needed] The aircraft is equipped with sophisticated navigation and attack systems integrated into a digital avionics suite. It navigates primarily by GPS and high-accuracy inertial navigation. Missions are coordinated by an automated planning system that can automatically perform all aspects of an attack mission, including weapons release.[44] Targets are acquired by a thermal imaging infrared system, paired with a laser rangefinder/laser designator that finds the range and designates targets for laser-guided bombs. The F-117's split internal bay can carry 5,000 pounds (2,300 kg) of ordnance. Typical weapons are a pair of GBU-10, GBU-12, or GBU-27 laser-guided bombs, two BLU-109 penetration bombs, or two Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM) GPS/INS guided stand-off bombs. COMBAT OVER YUGOSLAVIA
    Main article: 1999 F-117A shootdown
    Canopy of F-117 shot down in Serbia in March 1999 at the Museum of Aviation in Belgrade
    One F-117 (AF ser. no. 82-0806) was lost to enemy action. It was downed during an Operation Allied Force mission against the Army of Yugoslavia on 27 March 1999.[56] The aircraft was acquired by a fire control radar at a distance of 8.1 mi (13 km) and an altitude of 5.0 mi (8 km). SA-3s were then launched by a Yugoslav version of the Soviet Isayev S-125 "Neva" (NATO name SA-3 "Goa") anti-aircraft missile system.[56][57][58] The launcher was run by the 3rd Battalion of the 250th Air Defence Missile Brigade under the command of Colonel Zoltán Dani.[59]
    After the explosion, the aircraft became uncontrollable, forcing the pilot to eject.[56] The pilot was recovered six hours later by a United States Air Force Pararescue team.[56][60] The stealth technology from the downed F-117 may have been acquired by Russia and China.[61] The U.S. did not attempt to destroy the wreckage; senior Pentagon officials claimed that its technology was already dated and no longer important to protect.[28]
    American sources state that a second F-117 was targeted and damaged during the campaign, allegedly on 30 April 1999.[62][63] The aircraft returned to Spangdahlem base,[63] but it supposedly never flew again.[64][65] The USAF continued using the F-117 during Operation Allied Force.[66]

  • @Rodrigodrt
    @Rodrigodrt Рік тому +8

    Let's face it, the f117 has the coolest looking exhaust ever

  • @grahamgallick2928
    @grahamgallick2928 2 роки тому +15

    Sonic booms are no issue for stealth. I consider the lancer an early stealth bomber because it could come in slow drop a payload big enough to blow a hole and create the lakes for the U.A.E. and then fly away really fast. I was a kid when I first realized it because of watching the bombing of Baghdad on TV. You saw a shit ton of explosions and then the anti aircraft guns going off but by then the lancer was landing

  • @matts8039
    @matts8039 Рік тому +6

    If only planes were named by the soldiers:
    F-117 Wobbly Goblin

  • @2sqnbandit379
    @2sqnbandit379 Рік тому +6

    Never used as a fighter. It was primarily a bomber.

  • @soraisfinallyhere1305
    @soraisfinallyhere1305 Рік тому +2

    So cool looking loved it since a kid

  • @blurglide
    @blurglide 3 роки тому +11

    "Iron ball", not ion, and despite the "F" designation, this was no fighter

    • @epicspaces9434
      @epicspaces9434 3 роки тому +2

      when I see it, I feel deep in my heart, that is a fighter than needs just gloves

    • @some.randomdude
      @some.randomdude 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@epicspaces9434 no, any fighter capable of firing bvr (beyond visual range) missiles would need a radar, thus increasing its cross section, thus making it less stealthy. that would defeat the entire purpose of the nighthawk, a stealthy bomber.

  • @Jadfitree
    @Jadfitree Рік тому +3

    1977? Can’t Imagine what they have today 💀

    • @evanaja8658
      @evanaja8658 Рік тому +1

      Stealth drone, flip smartphone.

  • @SrdjaZlopogledja
    @SrdjaZlopogledja 3 роки тому +252

    Sorry we didnt know it was invisible. Greetings from Serbia!

    • @judgerivers7631
      @judgerivers7631 3 роки тому +68

      Serbia shot it down by accident..✌🏼😎

    • @jeshkam
      @jeshkam 3 роки тому +7

      Serbians, the biggest Putin admirers in the world. They shot it down by pure coincidence, but yet they're gonna boast about it until the end of the world. So lame... 🤣😂😁

    • @dabulls1g
      @dabulls1g 2 роки тому +41

      You don’t get points for doing it with pure luck.

    • @borba5825
      @borba5825 2 роки тому +17

      @@jeshkam we shot 2,we admired USA untill it started it's war of agression on Korea, Vietnam, Nicaragua and many other innocent countries.

    • @jeshkam
      @jeshkam 2 роки тому +47

      @@borba5825 Have you also stopped admiring Soviet Union/Russia for their wars, especially the WW2, and against Georgia, Afghanistan & Ukraine?

  • @jamesm7649
    @jamesm7649 2 роки тому +4

    A true assassin plane. Sneak in, drop two precision bombs, sneak out.

  • @Turtisland
    @Turtisland 2 роки тому +1

    6:00 this reminds me of when the U.S . Got hold of a Japanese Zero airplane in WW2 and learned its weaknesses.

  • @chikokishi7030
    @chikokishi7030 Рік тому +1

    The door challenge question to "have blue" was "i have RED the book"

  • @georgebaggy
    @georgebaggy Рік тому +2

    It was not the first true stealth fighter. It was not a fighter at all. It was a bomber.

  • @andihaka1143
    @andihaka1143 2 роки тому +12

    Ofc serbians would shot it down,having precise information from the french filoslavs about the location of deployment, flight trajectory, altitude and target.Not to mention the technical information and knowabout delivered by the russians.

    • @georgebaggy
      @georgebaggy Рік тому +3

      Don't forget the crucial fact that its bomb bays were open.

    • @pavlematovic2116
      @pavlematovic2116 6 місяців тому

      @@georgebaggy again not true they saw him long before that, the Americans say that because they are ashamed vvv.ua-cam.com/users/vatch?v=EuifD1K0lcK&t=585s

  • @defdef1354
    @defdef1354 2 роки тому +3

    I live next to a navy base and occasionally will see something similar to this flying at night.

    • @yanni2112
      @yanni2112 Рік тому

      I used to live near Miramar while I was at 32nd St San Diego, time of the Tomcat F-14! Saw lots flying right over us on HWY 15.

  • @JeremyThomson-ng8dp
    @JeremyThomson-ng8dp 6 місяців тому

    Whys the top angled, the bottom flat, dont radar waves come from ground radar?

  • @duckbizniz663
    @duckbizniz663 Рік тому +2

    The F-117 is a distinctive looking fighter jet. The multi-panel structure is unique. If the F-117 was shot down by Russian radar guided missiles then its radar-stealth capability cannot justify its aerodynamic dynamic instability. The multi-panel structure slows the fighter jet down and makes it less maneuverable. If you look at the F-22 and the F-35 these new stealth fighter jets clearly have abandoned the multi-panel design. Which brings into question if the Russian mathematician (Pyotr Ufimtsev) theories on radar avoidance have any validity. Only the US have enough resources to actually build something a crazy Russian mathematician dreamed up. Maybe it was a crazy Russian decoy the KGB thought up to get the Americans to waste time, effort, and money building something that had no advantage. What the KGB did not know was that the Americans were crazy enough to build a functional F-117. But the new F-22 and F-35 prove that not even American money nor American ingenuity can transform a KGB decoy into a fighter jet with real advantages.

    • @vinamaru
      @vinamaru 5 місяців тому

      Absolutely right.

  • @daxkedgx8698
    @daxkedgx8698 2 роки тому +1

    IE forgot to mention what the night hawk was not a fighter. it was and still is a strike jet and that's it....

  • @martinrps13
    @martinrps13 2 роки тому +5

    I miss hearing these things break them sound barrier. We lived in New Mexico when I was a kid and they had unrestricted flight access.

    • @chiefosceola14
      @chiefosceola14 2 роки тому +4

      These didn’t break the sound barrier

    • @martinrps13
      @martinrps13 2 роки тому

      @@chiefosceola14 some of them did….must be modified or have engine work

    • @Nick-tm2sw
      @Nick-tm2sw Рік тому +2

      @@martinrps13 Why would they modify it to break the sound barrier when they specifically designed it to be subsonic in the first place. You must be thinking of some other aircraft.

    • @martinrps13
      @martinrps13 Рік тому

      @@Nick-tm2sw I have no clue of their motives….but those things would make sonic booms all the time

    • @eac1235
      @eac1235 6 місяців тому

      ​@martinrps13 No they did not. You are delusional or high from sniffing glue.

  • @joshuakotrc5287
    @joshuakotrc5287 9 місяців тому +1

    In project wingman the cr-105 matches the same thing with the f-117 nighthawk

  • @pistol0grip0pump
    @pistol0grip0pump Рік тому

    I'm 99.99% certain that "Ion ball paints" is an error and in fact, what was meant was iron ball paint / Iron nanosphere paint. As "Ion ball paint" doesn't exist. 😂
    Iron Ball also makes sense as you'd want tiny nanosphere particles of a ferrous material that would absorb the EM Radiation and excite them into oscillating then dissipating that energy as heat.
    My curiosity and interest have now been piqued and I really want to know how much heat energy was created during use, what was the lowest/highest/average, and what changes or adjustments were needed to compensate for the additional heat created by the paint as the Nighthawk (and SR-71 Blackbird ) already had serious issues with heat/overheating that needed resolving, though I think the Nighthawks heat issues were from its body shape/design, the instrumentation, engines, and paint whereas the SR-71's heat issues were mainly caused by its intense speed, the very high altitude of flight, also it's design and materials as well as its engines as the higher altitude and thinner the air the harder it becomes for that heat to dissipate out away from the source.
    I'm looking forward to "losing" a couple of weeks just reading up and researching on these amazing pieces of history 😅 think - to be one of the designers, engineers or test pilots of these beautiful pieces of machinery! Amazing, Imagine showing Da Vinci what exists in 2023 and what we've accomplished as a species technologically speaking.

  • @Hanal503
    @Hanal503 Рік тому +1

    Masterpiece🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

  • @jamesbannerman4804
    @jamesbannerman4804 Рік тому +1

    They got lucky because the Airforce flew the same routes at the Sametime, easier to track.

  • @owenlien1593
    @owenlien1593 Рік тому

    Funny story one of the test pilots thought it was a space vehicle lol

  • @jefferywarner2916
    @jefferywarner2916 8 місяців тому

    It bounces like particles

  • @DOI_ARTS
    @DOI_ARTS Рік тому +1

    The only plane to have killed Steven Seagal

  • @jefferywarner2916
    @jefferywarner2916 8 місяців тому

    A stinger missile would have a hard time shooting down the 117 unlike the F 22

  • @Pwj579
    @Pwj579 3 роки тому +6

    ridiculously over simplification....read The Skunk Works by Ben Rich for the full story

    • @machupikachu1085
      @machupikachu1085 2 роки тому +1

      Yup. Your UA-cam video about the history of the F117 is way more comprehensive and informative.

    • @Nick-tm2sw
      @Nick-tm2sw Рік тому

      @@machupikachu1085 This video got a lot of stuff wrong though.

    • @machupikachu1085
      @machupikachu1085 Рік тому +1

      @@Nick-tm2sw that's probably true my dude. But, I find there are three types of UA-camrs: Creators, Consumers, and Complainers.
      I'm cool with the first two, but every once in a while, I gotta call out that third class. There are indeed cordial and classy ways to discuss points of contention. Those smug, haughty 'You're doing it wrong' comments however, contribute nothing.
      Cheers!

  • @jeremyhicks2449
    @jeremyhicks2449 Рік тому +1

    Hollman 2002-2005. 9th FS.

  • @JackSabahanmy
    @JackSabahanmy 2 роки тому

    nice

  • @eviltrickyspider5266
    @eviltrickyspider5266 8 місяців тому

    It reminds me of Doctor Jonathan reads aliens spacecraft in it's dimensions and looks.

  • @johnmoriarty6158
    @johnmoriarty6158 Рік тому +1

    You could buy a piece of a F-117 from street vendors is what I heard.

  • @randybramstedt5483
    @randybramstedt5483 4 місяці тому

    The Nighthawk was generally a failure. The shoot down of a Nighthawk in Yugoslavia doomed it as U.S. analysts realized long wavelength radar could see it. It was not retired for cost savings as we immediately embarked on the joint strike fighter program which resulted in an ineffective and problem-ridden F-35, the most expensive military project in history. Further advances in scanning radar technology also played a role in its retirement unlike what so many fake U.S. military propaganda sites like the National Interest claim. The F-117 was a toxic, embarrassing failure, so the Pentagon cut its losses. The biggest military contribution of the Nighthawk was flying over Super Bowl events and parades.

  • @tukangngaplod1069
    @tukangngaplod1069 Рік тому

    the flying EMC test chamber

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 Рік тому

    Realy I like this powerful aircraft like I want to have infinit numbers

  • @jayethompson3414
    @jayethompson3414 Рік тому +1

    1981…think about that. Move forward 40 years, what’s out there now?

  • @pavlematovic2116
    @pavlematovic2116 6 місяців тому

    sorry, we didn't know he was invisible 🥲

  • @Buddha363
    @Buddha363 Рік тому +1

    Just got a model of this ❤

  • @jdl.1234
    @jdl.1234 7 місяців тому

    Bert and Ernie made it fly.....Truth

  • @revolutionday1
    @revolutionday1 2 роки тому +2

    You lost me at "fighter".

  • @edwardv7991
    @edwardv7991 2 роки тому +4

    The best radar is spotters. You can't hide from visible eye unless you have cloaking technology 5:39

    • @TheBency
      @TheBency 2 роки тому +1

      @Darwin Biler That would be cool but unfortunately, F117 doesn't have that tech.

    • @Nick-tm2sw
      @Nick-tm2sw Рік тому +3

      Not really, because you can't launch a SAM using a spotter as guidance.

    • @YonIon996
      @YonIon996 9 місяців тому

      ​@@TheBency 2025 we gonna have that. CoD Bo2 told me!

  • @STASHYNSKYI
    @STASHYNSKYI 3 роки тому +10

    Don't mess with Serbs .

    • @Nick-tm2sw
      @Nick-tm2sw Рік тому +2

      Haha, everyone messes with the serbs.

    • @pavlematovic2116
      @pavlematovic2116 6 місяців тому

      @@Nick-tm2sw xD vvv.ua-cam.com/users/vatch?v=EuifD1K0lcK&t=585s

  • @saigonmonopoly1105
    @saigonmonopoly1105 10 місяців тому

    a triangle frisby disc

  • @saigonmonopoly1105
    @saigonmonopoly1105 10 місяців тому

    swept back wing to the tail

  • @Spiridon823
    @Spiridon823 Рік тому +1

    A što više ne lete😢😢😢

  • @saigonmonopoly1105
    @saigonmonopoly1105 10 місяців тому

    how you fly aqnd steer a wing in a wing

  • @anthonymaranan4237
    @anthonymaranan4237 Рік тому

    tHis iS a feAtuRe, noT a deFecT

  • @randybramstedt5483
    @randybramstedt5483 4 місяці тому

    None of the Nighthawks flying around sporadically are combat ready. The are in an official state of retirement. The units in existence today are beyond useability and generally poorly maintained. That are not a testament to U.S. aerospace success.

  • @blazingguyop
    @blazingguyop 3 роки тому

    Hahaha US indirectly given that plane to Russia so that we won't have any suspicious 😅

  • @ricardomilos69
    @ricardomilos69 2 роки тому +1

    John Cena piloted it

  • @marcusnilsson7179
    @marcusnilsson7179 3 місяці тому

    I heard USA tested this planes stealth in serbia

  • @veljkoventola2097
    @veljkoventola2097 2 роки тому +5

    This is the so-called invisible plane that was hit and destroyed in Serbia ... What a stunning technology.😂🤫

  • @lukaof1970
    @lukaof1970 Рік тому +2

    Serbian air defense.

  • @SlavaBogu888
    @SlavaBogu888 2 роки тому +6

    NATO lost around 150+ planes in 1999 including 4 destroyed and 1 crash landed F117 Nighthawks, B2A Spirit, B52 bomber, also not to mention 40 SAS members that were shot down in transport helicopter.

    • @kronk3892
      @kronk3892 2 роки тому

      Links

    • @kronk3892
      @kronk3892 2 роки тому

      B2 was never lost

    • @shipsndshit
      @shipsndshit 2 роки тому +1

      No B2s have ever been lost in combat

    • @acoustic296
      @acoustic296 2 роки тому

      lol where did you get that info? on your dog?😂

    • @SlavaBogu888
      @SlavaBogu888 2 роки тому +2

      B2 bomber was shot down, it was B2 Spirit of Missouri, and i do not blame you for not knowing that, your government isn't that stupid to publicly admit that they have lost a plane worth 2b dollars.

  • @brahmoone
    @brahmoone 3 роки тому

    glue..???

  • @jordan2760
    @jordan2760 8 місяців тому

    To think it stated from paper planes 🙉

  • @jermainesherls1949
    @jermainesherls1949 Рік тому

    So. This is why russia has the suu 47 n china has j20. From getting f117 tech????

  • @ismailzulfiqar3552
    @ismailzulfiqar3552 3 роки тому +1

    Nice vedio sir love from pakistan

  • @beekeepinginaustraliabyala9825
    @beekeepinginaustraliabyala9825 3 роки тому +7

    And all this lovely story about stealth fighter,best in world bla bla bla ended by obsolete missile shot in Serbia!!!
    😆😆😆

  • @saigonmonopoly1105
    @saigonmonopoly1105 10 місяців тому

    cover thrust engine

  • @umeshchittirai
    @umeshchittirai 3 роки тому +14

    Imagine an obsolete Air defense system shot down stealth fighter. Russia has latest missile defense systems like S-400 and S-500 now.

    • @umeshchittirai
      @umeshchittirai 3 роки тому

      @@chasseausanglier3390 of course. Defense contractors get the hard currency and govt will get the security. Win win situation for both

    • @borba5825
      @borba5825 2 роки тому +4

      @Massimo Hack it happened twice, no luck, just great air defence operators.

    • @arizonad8012
      @arizonad8012 2 роки тому +1

      @Massimo Hack Well US maybe need luck and all shit to keep them on the top on the scale.Some countries just have better training and more brain.

    • @David-zo7bg
      @David-zo7bg 2 роки тому +1

      850 sorties and one shot down. Something to be proud of:)

    • @arizonad8012
      @arizonad8012 2 роки тому +1

      @Massimo Hack US can strike people, but everything they do to others is coming back to them.They killed 3000 people in Serbia in bombing in 1999, but one terrorist attack 9/11 made lose more.Whole cementaries are full with their veterans, and 3 times more of disabled.Earthquakes, tornados, tsunamis, hurricanes, people killing each other on the street, school shootings, name it.Karma is free of charge.They are land of homless and unjustice.My hometown has 300000 people and no homeless, maybe we are not rich but still not on the streets.You watch to much propaganda, so you have wrong image of about whole situation.But I don't care keep going.

  • @SaxSith
    @SaxSith 8 місяців тому

    The mysteries ended in Serbia 😅

  • @danz3rgaming640
    @danz3rgaming640 2 роки тому +1

    First usa stealth aircraft made by using Soviet mathematician calculation
    🤣 What does Soviet union was doing
    🍻 🐻

    • @Nick-tm2sw
      @Nick-tm2sw Рік тому

      What does it matter if it was soviet math? They weren't the ones that made the first stealth aircraft.

  • @Bug-Intercourser
    @Bug-Intercourser Рік тому

    omg hiiiii :3

  • @monsterseweg89eersterechts75
    @monsterseweg89eersterechts75 2 роки тому

    Simonouthol

  • @tyukipji239
    @tyukipji239 2 роки тому +4

    Stealth capability,what mysteries,serbian force shoot down that F117,why they praise,its 0 capability.

    • @MadX8
      @MadX8 2 роки тому +1

      You're not stealth anymore if your enemy knows where to look at. That's precisely why one F117 has been shot down. Nothing to do with the aircraft capabilities

    • @Nick-tm2sw
      @Nick-tm2sw Рік тому

      @@MadX8 That just isn't true. You can know where to look but if you can't get a consistent radar track on it then you can launch a SAM at it. There have been instances when they knew the F-117 was close but couldn't actually launch anything because of the stealth of the aircraft.

  • @Vik-b_d
    @Vik-b_d Рік тому

    хм..

  • @charlottelatinda633
    @charlottelatinda633 3 роки тому +7

    I'm.. 50 a.n.d m.y. husband 54 we are both retired with over $3 million in net worth and no dept's. Currently living smart and frugal with our money.serving and investing life style in the stock market made it possible for us this early even till now we earn weekly. Thanks to fire movement.

    • @RobertSmith-nn5jm
      @RobertSmith-nn5jm 3 роки тому

      I'm a young dad, I'm really glad to hear your story it inspires me.

    • @tony2961
      @tony2961 3 роки тому

      What is fire movement please.?

    • @charlottelatinda633
      @charlottelatinda633 3 роки тому

      @@tony2961 Fire means Financial Independence Retire Early.
      It's been a movement teaching people financial independence and how to retire debt free through solid investment and frugal lifestyle.

    • @tony2961
      @tony2961 3 роки тому

      @@charlottelatinda633 Thanks for replying I will read more about fire movement.

    • @jeremysanchez5545
      @jeremysanchez5545 3 роки тому

      @@charlottelatinda633 Your story is inspiring I'm 38 trying to achieve this goal you achieved.share some tips please so others can actually learn.
      You haven't still share any idea on how you earn weekly.

  • @TamagoHead
    @TamagoHead Рік тому

    Nobody wanted to fly a tiny expensive ugly bomber. I think flight certs were 4 Mos or Something very outrageous.

  • @ATBatmanMALS31
    @ATBatmanMALS31 2 роки тому

    "Woblin' Goblin," bad video, would not recommend.

  • @neodelta5882
    @neodelta5882 Рік тому

    More doomsday weapons

  • @ethanfriend6305
    @ethanfriend6305 Рік тому

    Shit brown shirt n bdu’s 😂👍🏻

  • @joselitosiscar5966
    @joselitosiscar5966 Рік тому

    fall down in surbia. buwahahaa

    • @christophertesla
      @christophertesla 8 місяців тому

      Learn how to actually read and spell before you comment next time. I don't know the country "surbia" but if you are referring to Serbia, then you also clearly have no clue about what you are talking about. It didn't "fall down" it was shot-down by enemy fire because of extreme Serbian luck. The RADAR used was totally unable to detect the F-117 until the bomb-bay doors were opened. It was then fired upon by a missile guided by the 'anti-stealth' Soviet Radar set.

  • @yannalaplageable
    @yannalaplageable 3 роки тому

    no subs please

  • @PatHaskell
    @PatHaskell 22 дні тому

    AI videos are horrible

  • @svenkateswararao9516
    @svenkateswararao9516 3 роки тому +1

    First view