When you test for Post, how can you be sure that the test is accurate for the golfers natural tendency? Like say for example you mentioned Tseng or Ko, if you tested them after they changed their swing wouldnt their result be wrong? ( or does the test overcome their unnatural change)
I think u can kind of tell how each test subject was moving and placing their weight on to front, back or neutrally in their turn, usually people tend to do their natural way without swinging an actual club but I suppose they want us to put them on the swing catalyst and make them swing the three different ways and see which generates the most and best forces? Usually they have the simulator to capture the swing speed and other info too.
I think if you think of it in being terms of left or right handed with writing. you can teach someone to be the opposite but their natural inclination will make their original hand always feel easier
So wouldn't this drastically change what type of equipment a golfer would use? For example wouldn't a under swinger need more upright clubs maybe even a little shorter on the club's?
Talking about the people who changed their post and stopped winning how do you know these people didnt change on purpose due to any amount of variables. Just cause they lost clubhead speed doesnt mean anything... youre making assumptions to validate your product. Spieth is in the middle of a swing change and his game hasnt produced much of anything... rickie too... are u assuming their coaches dont know about your knowledge of your product? That seems awfully ignorant and cocky... dont worry i dont expect a response because i see on all your videos that you dont interact with your online community nor inquiring minds so i guess im just wasting my time
I am not sure that was the exact message here. Ideally, you would have a teacher who understands your peculiarities and works with them and uses them as an advantage (e.g. Matt Wolff trained by George Gankas). There are very few people like Bubba who are so natural, that they can teach themselves. I know many people who never took lessons and they are the worst golfers I know, they have horrible sequencing, tempo and all - chunking, slicing and duffing all over the place. You see that their bodies just have no clue what to do and they never learned it properly. Just because everyone is different and has a tendency to use a different post for example, doesn't mean that they can figure it all out by themselves. Good self thaught golfers are like ball lightnings - they seem to exist but almost no one has ever seen one.
I know a lot of guys that taught themselves and are very good golfers. I am also self taught. But this is not to say you don't need a coach. Some people do really need a coach.
@@jacobr4558moe norman probably never had a lesson nor a swing coach so that would drop bubba out of your 1 in 10,000 and im sure theres many more examples
@@tonybarber420 okay so out of all of the elementary school, middle school, and high school golf teams and programs, out of all the professional tours and high-level golfers around the world you can think of three INDIVIDUALS that didn't get lessons? My point isn't that it's impossible to get good without some sort of good coaching or teaching my point is that it's very improbable. It's like winning the lottery. Yes it happens but the odds aren't in your favor.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
When you test for Post, how can you be sure that the test is accurate for the golfers natural tendency? Like say for example you mentioned Tseng or Ko, if you tested them after they changed their swing wouldnt their result be wrong? ( or does the test overcome their unnatural change)
That's ultimately my question.
I think u can kind of tell how each test subject was moving and placing their weight on to front, back or neutrally in their turn, usually people tend to do their natural way without swinging an actual club but I suppose they want us to put them on the swing catalyst and make them swing the three different ways and see which generates the most and best forces? Usually they have the simulator to capture the swing speed and other info too.
I think if you think of it in being terms of left or right handed with writing. you can teach someone to be the opposite but their natural inclination will make their original hand always feel easier
I dont think these people care to interact with their online community which makes me suspect to what they think they know
@@tonybarber420 You absolutely right! This guy is up and close and a business genius. On-liners are looking for freebies. Is that right? Is that you?
Love your work Mike
Insightful
Yani Tseng changed coaches more than a year after plumeting down the rankings. Sucks to blame her slump on the new coach changing her post.
So wouldn't this drastically change what type of equipment a golfer would use? For example wouldn't a under swinger need more upright clubs maybe even a little shorter on the club's?
Maybe good info, but what to do?
Good content, but mike is not the best speaker so hard to watch and follow.
i thought it was pretty nice to follow, but i guess i am somewhat familiar with the content, which makes it easier
To be fair Mike is very knowledgeable. You need to know his methodology and once you do he makes a lot of sense. Get his book.
Can’t see it🤷♂️
"I want to thank the lady in the second row for the clap." That one could have gotten you in trouble!
Mike Adams mention famous golfers too much, in between clever remarks. Turn it down a bit
Talking about the people who changed their post and stopped winning how do you know these people didnt change on purpose due to any amount of variables. Just cause they lost clubhead speed doesnt mean anything... youre making assumptions to validate your product. Spieth is in the middle of a swing change and his game hasnt produced much of anything... rickie too... are u assuming their coaches dont know about your knowledge of your product? That seems awfully ignorant and cocky... dont worry i dont expect a response because i see on all your videos that you dont interact with your online community nor inquiring minds so i guess im just wasting my time
Anyone else wanna get tested? About as reliable as a PCR
You got some deep insights there. If it's as accurate as a PCR, it's basically flawless. Unless Mike didn't swab correctly...
Mike tested many people and doesn't explain how /why he assessed them in the identified category
Read his books
He’s talking to other teachers tbf. Look for other interviews. Its there. Mike and Terry Rowles hopefully have their book coming out soon too.
get pressure left
What on earth is this nonsense
So ..forget teachers..play on your own. Like Bubba Never had a lesson.!
I am not sure that was the exact message here. Ideally, you would have a teacher who understands your peculiarities and works with them and uses them as an advantage (e.g. Matt Wolff trained by George Gankas). There are very few people like Bubba who are so natural, that they can teach themselves. I know many people who never took lessons and they are the worst golfers I know, they have horrible sequencing, tempo and all - chunking, slicing and duffing all over the place. You see that their bodies just have no clue what to do and they never learned it properly. Just because everyone is different and has a tendency to use a different post for example, doesn't mean that they can figure it all out by themselves. Good self thaught golfers are like ball lightnings - they seem to exist but almost no one has ever seen one.
I know a lot of guys that taught themselves and are very good golfers. I am also self taught. But this is not to say you don't need a coach. Some people do really need a coach.
Bubba is 1 out of 10,000. If you think trial and error works for you have fun.
@@jacobr4558moe norman probably never had a lesson nor a swing coach so that would drop bubba out of your 1 in 10,000 and im sure theres many more examples
@@tonybarber420 okay so out of all of the elementary school, middle school, and high school golf teams and programs, out of all the professional tours and high-level golfers around the world you can think of three INDIVIDUALS that didn't get lessons? My point isn't that it's impossible to get good without some sort of good coaching or teaching my point is that it's very improbable. It's like winning the lottery. Yes it happens but the odds aren't in your favor.
Why are people still wearing masks?
That would be obvious, they’re trying to not get sick from contracting Covid.
why do you care what they choose to do? it's a free country right?
Because it’s not a free country and people can be sheep! Sad! Not for long.
They are most likly in California er i mean COMMIEfornia
@@ryanjhubbellthat doesnt make them exempt from ridicule... the answer is simple. They are democrats!