Elliot, I have been a Salomon rep in CO since 2012. I think you nailed this review. I skied the QST 99 everyday on ski patrol until the 99 became the 98. Since, I have now switched to the QST 92 for my daily driver. There were a couple seasons I entertained the idea of mounting the 92 but I never did. That's just what I did this season. Now, we're starting to see some snow storms roll in and soft snow... finally! Now, I have the new QST 98 and 106 ready to mount. Every season the 106 saw less than 10 days because I too never really agreed that the 106 was the one ski quiver for the exact reasons you mentioned. It saw less days because everyday in CO is not necessarily a pow day. I too like to arc around the resort on a narrower ski. The QST 99/98 is absolutely (in my opinion) a one ski quiver. If you can just have one. But, if you can have 3! They each excel in different and proper conditions. The 106 is definitely my go to powder ski. If you really want to ski a really good pow ski... try the Salomon Blank. I had it for one season and boy... that is a fun pow ski. Not necessarily the ski I want on groomers but that's not my point. I love that you love the 106 as much as you do. Please try the QST 92 on the hardpack. I think you'll really enjoy it. Keep it up!
I just got 106s this season and was on these at Wolf Creek yesterday. There were lots of areas with 3-4’ in the trees where I actually thought I could justify getting a Blank. 92s are my daily.
Thanks for the kind words! If you know anyone that I could talk to about reviewing more of the Salomon Skis (Blanks and Stance series) my email is ricketyskireviews@gmail.com, I've tried the regular channels and haven't been able to get ahold of anyone at Salomon. Cheers and thanks for the feedback!
@@SpudDood Apparently! Here's the issue... I don't have either skis right now and I would ski the longer of skis because I'm 6' 2". I think Elliot would ski shorter. I can't just buy those skis for the review as much as I would like to. I get a great discount but I still have to pay for my skis even though I sell and promote them. I'm a tiny little fish in the Salomon ocean.
I have about 12 days on the 92 this year in our anemic west ski season. Tons of man made, ice and some fresh groomed packed. It’s amazing and really easy to ski. It’s a carving ski. I ski with a lot of seasoned skiers and they all ask me about them. I’ve been on Stormrider 95’s, this year and last year Rustler 9’s, qst 98, and a handful of others and the qst 92’s rate near the top for me.
Been skiing the 2021 QST 106 as a one ski quiver/daily driver for the last 3 years (Breck is my home mountain). Great ski all around! Love it! Can get up on edge really well on hardpack. Feel quick and nimble in the bumps and trees. Can power through chop really well. Nice and forgiving but still stable. And float on powder surprisingly well (compared to the Rocker2 122).
Agree that it can be a daily driver and I have the 2020 version. Love them in all terrain assuming anything more than groomers or hard pack. As I'm working on my carving I would say they have a limit (by design) as the tail washes out when really pushing hard on groomers. I realized they are not designed for carving on hard pack, but as a Colorado skier I use these as my daily for four years now. Love Salomon's QST line period!
Thanks for saying “unless you’re at snowbird”. I think it’s important to mention all areas skiis are good or bad for. There’s quite a large group of people skiing in Utah
I never tought of ski lines as having a TRUE original and others were derived from it but it makes so much sense. That would explain why the experience is so different on enforcer 94 and 100. And why Black Crows skis performs so well overall as there are no lines : every ski is its own thing. Also, just tore my old boots last weekend. It felt like I couldnt carve anymore, my turns would washout on my left leg... Went inside, saw they were broken and done for hahaha. Received my new Lange Shadow 130 yesterday and already pinpointed points to aleviate (how nice is bootfitting seriously !? How did I ski for 20 years without this ?). Hoping to shred with them on friday !
Thanks for the review. How do you think these skis would do for a bigger skier? I'm 6'6", 225. I consider myself a very good skier with 60 years of experience (yes, I'm 65). I'm getting a 106 with 189cm. I also considered the Blank but I was concerned that I would get a little more "tired" with such a big ski. My daily is also a Maverick, although I went with the 95.
Hey. Great review! I love how it is crystal clear that you had a blast with them and laugh about it. Any long-term review comments? I am definitely considering these, but I´d love to hear more after more days! How do they compare to the Maverick 105s?
Very different from the Mav 105's more surfy and you can sit back on them a bit more where as the Mav 105's are more forward and carving oriented. Great idea! I think a long term review would be a great video for this summer.
I have a pair of aging DPS Wailer 112 Hybrids and was getting thrown around by skied-out powder today. The variable snow density made it really hard to keep my balance. I need something more stable, a bit heavier. Maybe this is it? Because yeah untracked powder is nice but 80% of the day is on tracked-out mess but I still want to have fun.
I was on 10+ yr old DPS 112 Wailer hybrids and moved to the 106 QST Echos this year. I'm in AK and tour 100% for my turns. Been very happy with the Echos. They're not quite as floaty as the 112's, but close. I sometimes wish they had the bigger DPS front shovel and an earlier rise in way deep stuff. But they do really well in the soft as a whole, and are far better in the variable conditions. I was looking for lighter, more versatile, and slightly narrower vs my DPS. When I do get in the backseat, they seem to be more forgiving vs my DPS. Very happy with them. I've set them up with ATK bindings and they def feel way lighter on the uphill too; approx 325 grams less per foot for skis/bindings, and I have much lighter skins too vs my DPS. Haven't skied them in spring time wetter snow, but so far so good.
Terrible snow this year in Alberta. Finally got to take my qst 98s out through some slightly skied off powder. They cut through the choppy sections so smoothly and i was very surprised how good they carved.
Like your review style! My current quiver is the Solomon Rocker2 102 (daily) and Solomon Rocker2 122 (powder). Yeah, they need updating. They are great tho, but my all time most favorite ski was the dynastar slicer. I might try these when I start demoing soon. Thanks!
Hi Elliot awesome review!! would love your advice. I am 175lbs 6’2” and have a M5 mantra living in CA. They’re hard to ski and the tail doesn’t release easily which makes woods or steep chutes. I’m looking for a ski that still carves well, is more nimble and complements the Mantra. Would QST 106 be a good one??
Thanks for the great review, I'm in the process of buying them myself. I'm going to use a hybrid binding, s/lab shift 13 mn, but I'm very unsure about the mount point. Would love to hear where you've mounted your binding. Did you just follow Solomon's recommendation (-9.15 cm from center)? Thanks :)
I was really torn between these and the Nordica Unleashed 108 to complement my Kore 93s. Ended up going with the Unleashed and really like them. Less surfy than the QSTs but still pretty playful and actually carve surprisingly well, you should try them sometime if you get the chance.
I just did a side by side demo with the QST98 and The Unleashed 98 and the QST won hands down. The biggest difference was the conditions where we had a little "stick" from some mixed precip before I got up the hill (Mt Bachelor) the 98s just slowed down hitting the sticky stuff more exposed to the sun and the Unleashed hit the parking brake like my Enforcers do. I don't think you'll be that impressed with the Unleashed. It's just a little brother to the Enforcer which for where I live is a great ski when you are going between crud to ice. I never worry about losing and edge with that. This is a perfect companion to the Enforcer or any hard driving hard conditions ski. @@RicketySkiReviews
Been watching all your videos. Been using my wife’s brothers ski’s and am finally getting my first pair of skis. We ski the Ikon pass here in utah. I will only have one ski for a year or two. Do I go 92,98,106? It will be daily driver here from snowbird, Alta, solitude and deer valley. Thanks man! Might grab a demo in all 3 and see.
That's a tough one, if it were me I'd think about the 92 (this is typically a question I only answer for members of the channel). Here's my review. ua-cam.com/video/qq_XyBif7To/v-deo.htmlsi=GX7I1_BjyACNI9Pk It won't do everything, but it's a good daily driver that will be comfortable and then eventually save up for a second powder ski down the line.
I have skied this model QST 106 for two years in Utah! I wouldn't call it just a "powder ski." But, it is a "soft snow ski," unless the powder is very deep or the snow is very heavy and clumpy! It is surfy and turns quickly; it's fabulous in the trees!! I also have the previous model of QST 106 with the orange sidewalls. It is more versatile in varied conditions; its a real crud buster when the snow is heavy! It also holds an edge better in firm conditions. With a more even flex and stiffer back end, its more stable, especially if you put significant pressure on the tails when skiing out of a turn in firmer snow. No ski is best for all conditions. But, I would pick the older model for hard or highly variable conditions! The newer model is absolutely incredible in soft snow!! Lastly, a small point: I think the newer model is closer to 180 cm in length than 182.
I’ve wanted to try the 106 for quite some time now. I’ve used the QST 98 and loved it carved way better than I thought it would. I’d assume they ski pretty similar?
I agree that the 98s go on edge easily, carve confidently, and feel familiar to something much thinner! All with the added float underneath it's impressive
Yeah they carve similarly with that comfortable turn, but are definitely surfier and float much much better. Slower turn initiation but that's kind of to be expected with the width.
I found you today, loving the reviews. I’m considering QST 98 and 106. I ski the Pacific Northwest. I already have Rossi Super 7 HD (115 underfoot) for deep days. Are the 106s too wide for groomers, crud, bumps, etc?
Elliot, I really enjoy watching your ski reviews! Please keep it going! I am considering purchasing the QST 106 but I am having difficulty selecting the right length (165 cm vs 173 cm). I am an advanced skier, I weigh 165 lbs, 5'5" tall. My home mountain is Mammoth Mountain in California. My current quiver consists of: 2017 K2 85ti (170 cm) groomer, 2017 Volkl Mantra (170 cm) great crud buster, 2023 Salomon QST 92 (168 cm) daily driver. Any length recommendation and suggestion you can provide would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! Fern Campos
Im on the qst92 here in the alps. Got them lasy season and what a fun ski. Now the problem is we actually have powder this year and as fun as the 92 is i am finding it hard work fresh snow deeper than a few inches. I have never had a dedicated power ski but looks like i should get one. Now the question is what would be make more sense, a 106 or go full send on the blank? Would love to hear what you think of the 92 and blank.
Getting videos and photos from friends at 3 Valles looks like a great season! I'm in Whistler but have skied the alps. Lots of time on skis from 68mm to 115mm. I'm on Rustler 9 and 11 but friends on qsts. I would 100% say 106 they have plenty of float,are super fun and don't leave you wanting when on a groomer or you only get 10-15cm of new. In short you'll ski them more than you think. Blanks are great but how many 30cm+ days a year will you ski? And the will only be marginally better in pow and not as good everywhere else.
Hi Elliott 😊 When is the wedding? 🤣😂🤣😂 If I can’t review the “Mirus Cor” I will try to review the QST 92. I think it’s great that you and the QST 106 are in total harmony in the powder… too bad you can’t try my Dupraz D2 HappyD skis. I had quite the run at Val d’Isère with them… it’s on my UA-cam channel. I enjoyed your positive vibes in this video 😊⛷
So I’m torn between these and the Bent 110s. Which do you feel are the better of the two ( just watched your 110 review). Neither as my daily driver. I’m a pretty aggressive skier. Love deep stuff. But also like to rip fast all over the mountain. Side hits, slashing, etc. Essentially use groomers to get to tree run s and powder stashes. Also considering putting bindings with a pin system for back country skinning. Does Look make a toe pin AT binding? Side bar question. LOL!
Been waiting for this review! Seen a lot of people with the qst 106 and blanks. When I ask how they like them (about 10ppl!) they love them and they also comment how good they do on the groomers. I’m at Bachelor btw. I have the QST 98s and I like them even though they are a bit heavy. A ton of qsts out here. Everyone likes them. Just for fun you should review the K2 Reckoner. I hate the K2 graphics but the ski is a lot of Fun.
That 106 ski is absolutely my daily driver. In fact it’s my bump ski. I rails in the groomers. It is not, accurately, a crudbuster, a bit soft. Mindber is my crud ski. Cheers.
@@unknowablerootvegetable the DW is my go to for anything where I’m not certain of conditions and I take one ski. It’s also the ski that I just hammer on. At a glance it looks purpose built but really covers a lot of territory. I have some old Bibby,s too but I don’t ski them much. Deathwish!!!🤘🏽
Would love to! Haven't had great luck with getting Moment to work with me currently, but hoping to in the future, and will certainly try if I can find a pair to demo along the way.
What length did you demo on these, relative to your height? Is a slightly shorter version of this ski going to be plenty of float and maneuverability? Or should a person go more true to height?
just found out my friend was sold enforcer 100's in 172 on the east coast. he's a beginner/intermediate skier. wow i am disappointed in that employee. too short, too heavy, too wide. disaster! you NEED to get on the mfree 108 in 192 on a trip to snowbird. thing is a beast.
love your reviews - what do you think about the length? I heard they may ski short. I am 6’1 175 lbs advanced/expert and normally ski a 180-184, do you think the 189 would be too much? I want to ski trees and think the 181 may provide enough float with my weight but don’t want to mess this up. Thanks a lot!
Hey buddy -- I also bought a new set of QST98s for this season. I was able to take them out on hardpack earlier this week and I can echo that these skis were an absolute joy. Super fun. I had jumped from a directional 80mm underfoot to these 98s and I can say that while I was expecting learning curve, they carved and handled like a thinner front side ski, potentially even better than my 80s lol. Biggest thing I noticed was being a bit more "slidy" under foot when standing still and at low speeds, but at standard speed they just felt super familiar right away on the first run. Very impressive, it was a very seamless transition for me, and the benefits were instantly noticeable, no edge catching, better pivoting, floated over crud, easy to put on edge. etc. They make me feel super confident all through the turn and I can't wait to take them out west next week and challenge them off piste, glades, trees, powder, etc. In a previous review of the 98 I think Elliott mentioned the one drawback on them was they can get squirrelly if you pull them out of a turn early without finishing to initiate a different turn. (Like in a tight steep corridor for example) I actually tried to replicate that phenomenon but didn't seem to notice, yet. Will keep trying to push these but overall highly satisfied with the purchase and I have Salomon and moreso, Elliot @RicketySkiReviews to thank. Kudos and keep up the excellent work.
@@10SMaxx-e5j You truly are a cynical wolverine! Yes we get powder in the Northeast. A few resorts even get more than the resort (Bogus Basin) featured in the video. I've skied my fair share of 2' dumps out here. It just doesn't last long with the narrow trails and high skier density.
My local ski shop has some 2024's on sale for $525 right now and I'm seriously considering them. They only have 181cm on hand I think that'll work for me, I'm 6'2" and weigh 210lbs, I ski in eastern Washington State. I love the new color scheme for 24' too!
So you mentioned you liked these over Bent 100 (which I’ve been looking at), but how do think the Bent 110s would compare? Mainly ride at Snowbird and Brighton.
Haven't tested the 110's but I didn't love the Bent 100's turning, they kind of half load the turn, but If you don't care about turning, and want pop for the park, I thought they did a fine job in the powder and trees, I would say if you're going for a designated powder ski go for the 110, if you're looking for a daily driver, maybe look at the maverick 100's they have horizon tech for flotation and carve well.
I have a whole video on this but, basically whatever you find works for you and is reliable, I'm on my 3rd pair of this specific binding. Here's that video: ua-cam.com/video/hXOazGZdBgY/v-deo.htmlsi=SttuSdSYEnvcT3bT
one day, maybe I'll be as cool as you, and have a pair of QST 106 too... for now, Im stuck with a 2014 Solomon Rocker 2.. A 106 in mtn blue. Its probably a bit more of a daily driver, less optimized for pow... OK poem aside -- great review -- but you pulled a ski essentials -- mentioned in passing but didn't go off on the weakness -- wet heavy chunked up powder, where monster trucky or tanklike is preferable to surfy.
I just felt like it was a choice rather than a weakness if that makes sense, same way I don't dock crud cutter skis when they don't float if I'm explaining that well at all.
I think people are too concerned with metal in skis. There's way better construction materials and approaches to make a ski perform well, and for most people, will create a larger sweet spot. I think the QST is a great example of that. Ripstick is also in that category.
There's nothing like the bomb-proof feel of a ski that has a bunch of metal in it though. I still miss the Brahma 88 I had and really appreciate the imperturbability of the Cochise. Hopefully the Anomaly will leave some of this feel intact...
Totally agree, though I think a lot of it depends on construction to make the most of the wood. But you're right, some companies are really making big leaps.
@@RicketySkiReviews thank you! Do you find the length ok? I’m also 6’1” ish (185cm), and 250lbs geared. Worried they might be too short. And don’t wanna go to the 189. Haha, with they made a 186, like the Blanks.
@@bearclaw5115 thanks! I ended up buying the 189. They’re only a tiny bit longer than my 186 Blizzard Rustlers. Still haven’t skied them yet… just got them.
Would Cody Townsend steer us wrong? Heck no! Today, I just skied on my qst 106 echos and they are phenomenal. Of course the echos are geared more for the uphill, they still kicked ass on the down. Anyone interested in backcountry should check them out.
@@RicketySkiReviews I'm a big fan of his UA-cam channel "The 50". Granted the peakbaggings are few and far between now that he has a kid and there are only a few hard ones left. But awesome content anyways.
I've skiied just about every width from 75 to 145 wide and yeah, the 100 +-5 mm range is probably my favorite if I could only own one ski... But I don't lol. Owning a carving ski and a pow ski is better if you can own 2 IMO. Nothing against the 106 tho, had a fun weekend on them last year just not enough to buy for me
“Closest thing to snowboarding on skiis”… my friend, you need to get on something properly wide and surfy then! When you can afford it, having something 110 underfoot is pretty incredible. No compromise
I imagine you are mostly catering to folks who primarily ski groomers, but it would be nice to hear you, as well as other ski reviewers, provide more context when reviewing skis. I'd agree this ski is not a daily driver if you primarily ski groomers. However, this ski could be great for someone who prioritizes off-piste performance above groomer performance. There is just so much that goes into the decision of what type of ski to get from location, style of skiing, performance prioritization, etc. that all go into determining what ski would be best for someone...I'd just like to hear ski reviewers address that a bit more.
Great question, very different skis, but both have huge strengths. I have a full review on the draco freebirds here: ua-cam.com/video/2AUxIt2VFL8/v-deo.htmlsi=xUbxbw03TlZx9E5h Biggest difference I noticed off hands obviously the freebirds feel much lighter and the flex pattern is quite different (not better or worse just different timing).
Elliott! As much of a QST fanboy as I am, I have to report that my buddy experienced the second QST failure that I have seen in 2 yrs. First was a binding ripping from the plate, second was a rip that started at the tip of the ski where the topsheet begins to bevel toward the sidewall. It progressed in one day of riding into complete topsheet delam at the tip and the sidewall/core splitting from the base/edge. Salomon's warranty is good, but I'm sad they aren't holding up well.
@@jeffspicoli2643 Brand new 2024 ones. It is just one for delam. Another from the new model lost a binding. Same warranty, so he's out a pair on the second failure
@@_e5598 In the 10 years I've been with Salomon I have only seen a telemark binding pull out of a QST 106. If his alpine pulled out... that sounds like a bad mount. As far as the QST 106 delam... I have never had it happen to me but I have had 2 people have the issue. The circumstances are too great to know exactly why it did. That of course is a warranty issue if it falls within the warranty timeline and should be replaced. Again, the ski needs to be inspected to find out why also. Sorry you bud is out a pair of skis.
There's really not much not to like about them on a soft snow day. There was only one thing that kept me from keeping my qsts. I thought they were a little bit heavy. Not much but just a little bit. But maybe that's my problem, because i'm only about one hundred and sixty pounds.
@RicketySkiReviews I replaced them with the volkl blaze. Very satisfied. Lighter than qst, carves better on groomers (imo) , much livelier. Not quite as smooth or damp tho. Would like to hear your opinion on the Blaze series eventually. They are pretty popular.
Before you even start talking about these skis.. I did demo them 2 seasons ago and I really enjoyed them.. I do know that they shortened the turn radius which does affect skis..
there is no metal but the ski is not reactive.. it plows through anything and is very stable and reliable.. tons of float.. very similar to my DPS Foundation RP 100.. my RP has a 15m turn radius and the tails are very catchy.. my guess is that the new shape of the QST 106 has a little larger turn radius.. i know my Enforcer 104 FRee has 17.5m turn radius and that is probably similar to the QST 106... and yes i just compared them to Enforcer.. don't beat me up;)
i saw your fall... i did break my arm on the skis.... saw Jesus.. He's doing fine.. they do chatter on rock hard groomers and they will slide on ice.. the day i had them there was 6 inches on ice.. within an hour it turned to crud and the skis were awwwww sum... the long radius and the ton of people on the hill (holiday) was what wore me out.. for me the skis are about surfing rather than carving.. where i broke my arm was on some tight moguls going through some tight trees.. I don't really recommend these skis for that.. i came out of the binding on top of a mogul which is kind of a fluke..
i didn't get a chance to ski them on wet snow but i would think that they would be fine.. my challenge to you is to ski them 8 more days and then make another video.. you can pick the conditions you want to ski them...
Elliot, I have been a Salomon rep in CO since 2012. I think you nailed this review. I skied the QST 99 everyday on ski patrol until the 99 became the 98. Since, I have now switched to the QST 92 for my daily driver. There were a couple seasons I entertained the idea of mounting the 92 but I never did. That's just what I did this season. Now, we're starting to see some snow storms roll in and soft snow... finally! Now, I have the new QST 98 and 106 ready to mount. Every season the 106 saw less than 10 days because I too never really agreed that the 106 was the one ski quiver for the exact reasons you mentioned. It saw less days because everyday in CO is not necessarily a pow day. I too like to arc around the resort on a narrower ski. The QST 99/98 is absolutely (in my opinion) a one ski quiver. If you can just have one. But, if you can have 3! They each excel in different and proper conditions. The 106 is definitely my go to powder ski. If you really want to ski a really good pow ski... try the Salomon Blank. I had it for one season and boy... that is a fun pow ski. Not necessarily the ski I want on groomers but that's not my point. I love that you love the 106 as much as you do. Please try the QST 92 on the hardpack. I think you'll really enjoy it. Keep it up!
I just got 106s this season and was on these at Wolf Creek yesterday. There were lots of areas with 3-4’ in the trees where I actually thought I could justify getting a Blank. 92s are my daily.
Thanks for the kind words! If you know anyone that I could talk to about reviewing more of the Salomon Skis (Blanks and Stance series) my email is ricketyskireviews@gmail.com, I've tried the regular channels and haven't been able to get ahold of anyone at Salomon.
Cheers and thanks for the feedback!
Please Jeff, you're our best chance at seeing Elliott review the Blank or Stance!
@@SpudDood Apparently! Here's the issue... I don't have either skis right now and I would ski the longer of skis because I'm 6' 2". I think Elliot would ski shorter. I can't just buy those skis for the review as much as I would like to. I get a great discount but I still have to pay for my skis even though I sell and promote them. I'm a tiny little fish in the Salomon ocean.
@@jeffspicoli2643 That makes total sense, I misunderstood the rep title, I was thinking you could send him demos or something.
Great review thanks for getting back to me. Have to make it out to bogus basin. One of these days. You’re doing a good thing out there. Thanks a lot.
I have about 12 days on the 92 this year in our anemic west ski season. Tons of man made, ice and some fresh groomed packed. It’s amazing and really easy to ski. It’s a carving ski. I ski with a lot of seasoned skiers and they all ask me about them. I’ve been on Stormrider 95’s, this year and last year Rustler 9’s, qst 98, and a handful of others and the qst 92’s rate near the top for me.
That's awesome, glad you love them!
Been skiing the 2021 QST 106 as a one ski quiver/daily driver for the last 3 years (Breck is my home mountain). Great ski all around! Love it!
Can get up on edge really well on hardpack. Feel quick and nimble in the bumps and trees. Can power through chop really well. Nice and forgiving but still stable. And float on powder surprisingly well (compared to the Rocker2 122).
Agree that it can be a daily driver and I have the 2020 version. Love them in all terrain assuming anything more than groomers or hard pack. As I'm working on my carving I would say they have a limit (by design) as the tail washes out when really pushing hard on groomers. I realized they are not designed for carving on hard pack, but as a Colorado skier I use these as my daily for four years now. Love Salomon's QST line period!
Thanks for saying “unless you’re at snowbird”. I think it’s important to mention all areas skiis are good or bad for. There’s quite a large group of people skiing in Utah
Good review, glad you are very happy with a ski you own. Its always nice when things work out that way.
Yes, totally!
Love the videos man! If you ever come out to northern UT, would love to cruise with you! Keep up the good work.
Thanks!
I never tought of ski lines as having a TRUE original and others were derived from it but it makes so much sense. That would explain why the experience is so different on enforcer 94 and 100. And why Black Crows skis performs so well overall as there are no lines : every ski is its own thing.
Also, just tore my old boots last weekend. It felt like I couldnt carve anymore, my turns would washout on my left leg... Went inside, saw they were broken and done for hahaha. Received my new Lange Shadow 130 yesterday and already pinpointed points to aleviate (how nice is bootfitting seriously !? How did I ski for 20 years without this ?). Hoping to shred with them on friday !
Great review. Would you pick these or the bent 110 for your powder ski given both were so good?
Thanks for the review. How do you think these skis would do for a bigger skier? I'm 6'6", 225. I consider myself a very good skier with 60 years of experience (yes, I'm 65). I'm getting a 106 with 189cm. I also considered the Blank but I was concerned that I would get a little more "tired" with such a big ski. My daily is also a Maverick, although I went with the 95.
Hey. Great review! I love how it is crystal clear that you had a blast with them and laugh about it. Any long-term review comments? I am definitely considering these, but I´d love to hear more after more days! How do they compare to the Maverick 105s?
I should have mentioned, I ski in Europe (Alps and Pyrenees) and my intention is to use these as powder skis (mid-80s skis for normal days)
Very different from the Mav 105's more surfy and you can sit back on them a bit more where as the Mav 105's are more forward and carving oriented. Great idea! I think a long term review would be a great video for this summer.
I have a pair of aging DPS Wailer 112 Hybrids and was getting thrown around by skied-out powder today. The variable snow density made it really hard to keep my balance. I need something more stable, a bit heavier. Maybe this is it? Because yeah untracked powder is nice but 80% of the day is on tracked-out mess but I still want to have fun.
I was on 10+ yr old DPS 112 Wailer hybrids and moved to the 106 QST Echos this year. I'm in AK and tour 100% for my turns. Been very happy with the Echos. They're not quite as floaty as the 112's, but close. I sometimes wish they had the bigger DPS front shovel and an earlier rise in way deep stuff. But they do really well in the soft as a whole, and are far better in the variable conditions. I was looking for lighter, more versatile, and slightly narrower vs my DPS. When I do get in the backseat, they seem to be more forgiving vs my DPS. Very happy with them. I've set them up with ATK bindings and they def feel way lighter on the uphill too; approx 325 grams less per foot for skis/bindings, and I have much lighter skins too vs my DPS. Haven't skied them in spring time wetter snow, but so far so good.
Terrible snow this year in Alberta. Finally got to take my qst 98s out through some slightly skied off powder. They cut through the choppy sections so smoothly and i was very surprised how good they carved.
Like your review style! My current quiver is the Solomon Rocker2 102 (daily) and Solomon Rocker2 122 (powder). Yeah, they need updating. They are great tho, but my all time most favorite ski was the dynastar slicer. I might try these when I start demoing soon. Thanks!
Hi Elliot awesome review!! would love your advice. I am 175lbs 6’2” and have a M5 mantra living in CA. They’re hard to ski and the tail doesn’t release easily which makes woods or steep chutes. I’m looking for a ski that still carves well, is more nimble and complements the Mantra. Would QST 106 be a good one??
Thanks for the great review, I'm in the process of buying them myself. I'm going to use a hybrid binding, s/lab shift 13 mn, but I'm very unsure about the mount point. Would love to hear where you've mounted your binding. Did you just follow Solomon's recommendation (-9.15 cm from center)?
Thanks :)
Yeah, I mounted them true to the manufacturers recommendation.
I was really torn between these and the Nordica Unleashed 108 to complement my Kore 93s. Ended up going with the Unleashed and really like them. Less surfy than the QSTs but still pretty playful and actually carve surprisingly well, you should try them sometime if you get the chance.
Hoping to! just need to get my hands on a pair.
I just did a side by side demo with the QST98 and The Unleashed 98 and the QST won hands down. The biggest difference was the conditions where we had a little "stick" from some mixed precip before I got up the hill (Mt Bachelor) the 98s just slowed down hitting the sticky stuff more exposed to the sun and the Unleashed hit the parking brake like my Enforcers do. I don't think you'll be that impressed with the Unleashed. It's just a little brother to the Enforcer which for where I live is a great ski when you are going between crud to ice. I never worry about losing and edge with that. This is a perfect companion to the Enforcer or any hard driving hard conditions ski. @@RicketySkiReviews
Been watching all your videos. Been using my wife’s brothers ski’s and am finally getting my first pair of skis. We ski the Ikon pass here in utah. I will only have one ski for a year or two. Do I go 92,98,106? It will be daily driver here from snowbird, Alta, solitude and deer valley. Thanks man! Might grab a demo in all 3 and see.
That's a tough one, if it were me I'd think about the 92 (this is typically a question I only answer for members of the channel). Here's my review. ua-cam.com/video/qq_XyBif7To/v-deo.htmlsi=GX7I1_BjyACNI9Pk
It won't do everything, but it's a good daily driver that will be comfortable and then eventually save up for a second powder ski down the line.
These and the qst blank are definitely on my list to try when I go out west.
hoping to review the QST blanks myself!
I have skied this model QST 106 for two years in Utah! I wouldn't call it just a "powder ski." But, it is a "soft snow ski," unless the powder is very deep or the snow is very heavy and clumpy! It is surfy and turns quickly; it's fabulous in the trees!! I also have the previous model of QST 106 with the orange sidewalls. It is more versatile in varied conditions; its a real crud buster when the snow is heavy! It also holds an edge better in firm conditions. With a more even flex and stiffer back end, its more stable, especially if you put significant pressure on the tails when skiing out of a turn in firmer snow. No ski is best for all conditions. But, I would pick the older model for hard or highly variable conditions! The newer model is absolutely incredible in soft snow!! Lastly, a small point: I think the newer model is closer to 180 cm in length than 182.
I’ve wanted to try the 106 for quite some time now. I’ve used the QST 98 and loved it carved way better than I thought it would. I’d assume they ski pretty similar?
I agree that the 98s go on edge easily, carve confidently, and feel familiar to something much thinner! All with the added float underneath it's impressive
Yeah they carve similarly with that comfortable turn, but are definitely surfier and float much much better. Slower turn initiation but that's kind of to be expected with the width.
Finally! :) Great review!
I just bought these with the shifts based on your advice)
Set the bindings to the recommended point?
Right on! That's what I did and have been happy
Oof the fall. I’d tumble a lot more. Love the vids
Luckily a soft landing
I found you today, loving the reviews. I’m considering QST 98 and 106. I ski the Pacific Northwest. I already have Rossi Super 7 HD (115 underfoot) for deep days. Are the 106s too wide for groomers, crud, bumps, etc?
No they do well, but definitely not as well as powder, just depends on your priorities.
Elliot,
I really enjoy watching your ski reviews! Please keep it going!
I am considering purchasing the QST 106 but I am having difficulty selecting the right length (165 cm vs 173 cm). I am an advanced skier, I weigh 165 lbs, 5'5" tall. My home mountain is Mammoth Mountain in California. My current quiver consists of: 2017 K2 85ti (170 cm) groomer, 2017 Volkl Mantra (170 cm) great crud buster, 2023 Salomon QST 92 (168 cm) daily driver. Any length recommendation and suggestion you can provide would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks!
Fern Campos
Im on the qst92 here in the alps. Got them lasy season and what a fun ski. Now the problem is we actually have powder this year and as fun as the 92 is i am finding it hard work fresh snow deeper than a few inches. I have never had a dedicated power ski but looks like i should get one. Now the question is what would be make more sense, a 106 or go full send on the blank? Would love to hear what you think of the 92 and blank.
Getting videos and photos from friends at 3 Valles looks like a great season!
I'm in Whistler but have skied the alps. Lots of time on skis from
68mm to 115mm. I'm on Rustler 9 and 11 but friends on qsts.
I would 100% say 106 they have plenty of float,are super fun and don't leave you wanting when on a groomer or you only get 10-15cm of new.
In short you'll ski them more than you think. Blanks are great but how many 30cm+ days a year will you ski? And the will only be marginally better in pow and not as good everywhere else.
Hard to say as I haven't tested the blank yet, I'm sorry but I do love the 106 and felt like it was perfectly capable in the powder.
@@RicketySkiReviews great to have you opinion in your latest video! thank you for following this up! all the best
Hi Elliott 😊 When is the wedding? 🤣😂🤣😂
If I can’t review the “Mirus Cor” I will try to review the QST 92. I think it’s great that you and the QST 106 are in total harmony in the powder… too bad you can’t try my Dupraz D2 HappyD skis. I had quite the run at Val d’Isère with them… it’s on my UA-cam channel. I enjoyed your positive vibes in this video 😊⛷
I'm actually reviewing the mirus cor this week!
@@RicketySkiReviews…. I eagerly await your review 😊⛷
So I’m torn between these and the Bent 110s. Which do you feel are the better of the two ( just watched your 110 review). Neither as my daily driver. I’m a pretty aggressive skier. Love deep stuff. But also like to rip fast all over the mountain. Side hits, slashing, etc. Essentially use groomers to get to tree run s and powder stashes. Also considering putting bindings with a pin system for back country skinning. Does Look make a toe pin AT binding? Side bar question. LOL!
qst 106 is heavier, stiffer and more stable, so if you are aggressive go for qst.
Been waiting for this review! Seen a lot of people with the qst 106 and blanks. When I ask how they like them (about 10ppl!) they love them and they also comment how good they do on the groomers. I’m at Bachelor btw. I have the QST 98s and I like them even though they are a bit heavy. A ton of qsts out here. Everyone likes them. Just for fun you should review the K2 Reckoner. I hate the K2 graphics but the ski is a lot of Fun.
I did actually review the reckoner this past summer! though tbf it's one of my earlier rougher reviews.
@@RicketySkiReviews i'll check it out!
That 106 ski is absolutely my daily driver. In fact it’s my bump ski. I rails in the groomers. It is not, accurately, a crudbuster, a bit soft. Mindber is my crud ski. Cheers.
Those are good crud skis!
Great review, I think you should try and demo some moment wildcats or deathwishes
Deathwish!!!! I’d love to see some opinions on that other than myself and the outlaws I ski with.
@@twomedicine love the DW. SO much fun to ski.
@@unknowablerootvegetable the DW is my go to for anything where I’m not certain of conditions and I take one ski. It’s also the ski that I just hammer on. At a glance it looks purpose built but really covers a lot of territory. I have some old Bibby,s too but I don’t ski them much. Deathwish!!!🤘🏽
Love the Deathwish! Ski the women’s version (the Sierras). The triple camber is so lively and rips.
Would love to! Haven't had great luck with getting Moment to work with me currently, but hoping to in the future, and will certainly try if I can find a pair to demo along the way.
What length did you demo on these, relative to your height?
Is a slightly shorter version of this ski going to be plenty of float and maneuverability? Or should a person go more true to height?
It just depends on preference, I'm 6'1" and ski these in a 182
@@RicketySkiReviews I'm 6'2" and have used older 177 all mountain skis. Haven't tried a powder ski at any time.
just found out my friend was sold enforcer 100's in 172 on the east coast. he's a beginner/intermediate skier. wow i am disappointed in that employee. too short, too heavy, too wide. disaster!
you NEED to get on the mfree 108 in 192 on a trip to snowbird. thing is a beast.
That's such a bummer, tell your friend to take you with him next time! lol
love your reviews - what do you think about the length? I heard they may ski short. I am 6’1 175 lbs advanced/expert and normally ski a 180-184, do you think the 189 would be too much? I want to ski trees and think the 181 may provide enough float with my weight but don’t want to mess this up. Thanks a lot!
That's a service for members, but I'm 6'1" and run it in the 182 and am happy, hope that helps
I just bought the QSt 98s, I can't wait to try them. Would you say you had a similar experience than those ? Thanks
Similar, I have a full review and several videos on the QST 98
Hey buddy -- I also bought a new set of QST98s for this season. I was able to take them out on hardpack earlier this week and I can echo that these skis were an absolute joy. Super fun. I had jumped from a directional 80mm underfoot to these 98s and I can say that while I was expecting learning curve, they carved and handled like a thinner front side ski, potentially even better than my 80s lol. Biggest thing I noticed was being a bit more "slidy" under foot when standing still and at low speeds, but at standard speed they just felt super familiar right away on the first run. Very impressive, it was a very seamless transition for me, and the benefits were instantly noticeable, no edge catching, better pivoting, floated over crud, easy to put on edge. etc. They make me feel super confident all through the turn and I can't wait to take them out west next week and challenge them off piste, glades, trees, powder, etc.
In a previous review of the 98 I think Elliott mentioned the one drawback on them was they can get squirrelly if you pull them out of a turn early without finishing to initiate a different turn. (Like in a tight steep corridor for example) I actually tried to replicate that phenomenon but didn't seem to notice, yet. Will keep trying to push these but overall highly satisfied with the purchase and I have Salomon and moreso, Elliot @RicketySkiReviews to thank. Kudos and keep up the excellent work.
I really appreciate the time you took for this very detailed review. It makes me think I choose the good ski. So stoked 🤟🏼
@@vincent.bld66 🤙🏻
Hi. Thank you for the video. I have been considering the qst 106 in 181 length. I am 179 cm and 90kg. Do you think that sounds about right?
How would you compare these to the BC Draco’s? Specifically in pow / trees? Thx
Similar flotation, but I like the surfier turn in the qst as well as a more clean carve on trail.
Love your stuff!! Could you timestamp where you go over the sizing recommendations?
wdym?
time stamp sections of your review!@@RicketySkiReviews
I have QST 92 for "powder" days in New England.
Powder in New England, that’s hilarious.
How do you like it?
@@10SMaxx-e5j You truly are a cynical wolverine! Yes we get powder in the Northeast. A few resorts even get more than the resort (Bogus Basin) featured in the video. I've skied my fair share of 2' dumps out here. It just doesn't last long with the narrow trails and high skier density.
My local ski shop has some 2024's on sale for $525 right now and I'm seriously considering them. They only have 181cm on hand I think that'll work for me, I'm 6'2" and weigh 210lbs, I ski in eastern Washington State. I love the new color scheme for 24' too!
I think I'd hold out for some 189's with your stats.
@@bearclaw5115 I think you're right
Hey, what would you think of putting fritschi tectons on those as a freetouring/slackcountry/freeride hybrid ? Too heavy for that ?
Not familiar enough with that binding to say, sorry not a very helpful reply, but want to be honest with you.
@RicketySkiReviews thanks I appreciate the honnesty. Thanks for your (great) content.
Please tell me where you are skiing this QST 106. What resort is that looks wonderful.
Bogus Basin in Idaho near Boise.
Bogus Basin
So you mentioned you liked these over Bent 100 (which I’ve been looking at), but how do think the Bent 110s would compare? Mainly ride at Snowbird and Brighton.
You should watch some of his videos on the bents. I think he actually does a direct comparison between these two lines.
Haven't tested the 110's but I didn't love the Bent 100's turning, they kind of half load the turn, but If you don't care about turning, and want pop for the park, I thought they did a fine job in the powder and trees, I would say if you're going for a designated powder ski go for the 110, if you're looking for a daily driver, maybe look at the maverick 100's they have horizon tech for flotation and carve well.
Curious about what makes good bindings good. I have no idea what the differences are.
I have a whole video on this but, basically whatever you find works for you and is reliable, I'm on my 3rd pair of this specific binding.
Here's that video: ua-cam.com/video/hXOazGZdBgY/v-deo.htmlsi=SttuSdSYEnvcT3bT
one day, maybe I'll be as cool as you, and have a pair of QST 106 too... for now, Im stuck with a 2014 Solomon Rocker 2.. A 106 in mtn blue. Its probably a bit more of a daily driver, less optimized for pow... OK poem aside -- great review -- but you pulled a ski essentials -- mentioned in passing but didn't go off on the weakness -- wet heavy chunked up powder, where monster trucky or tanklike is preferable to surfy.
I just felt like it was a choice rather than a weakness if that makes sense, same way I don't dock crud cutter skis when they don't float if I'm explaining that well at all.
i daily drive the 106 and love it!
I found a pair of 2022 qst 106's for a good price on facebook. have they changed much in the last 2 seasons?
Yes they changed some of the construction features specifically the sidewall,
I think people are too concerned with metal in skis. There's way better construction materials and approaches to make a ski perform well, and for most people, will create a larger sweet spot. I think the QST is a great example of that. Ripstick is also in that category.
There's nothing like the bomb-proof feel of a ski that has a bunch of metal in it though. I still miss the Brahma 88 I had and really appreciate the imperturbability of the Cochise.
Hopefully the Anomaly will leave some of this feel intact...
rubber is a cheat code.
I have the Ripstick, it’s an enjoyable ski. It’s got carbon fiber and no metal.
Totally agree, though I think a lot of it depends on construction to make the most of the wood. But you're right, some companies are really making big leaps.
These are my wife’s daily drivers, for all but the hard and fast days. We ski the northeast.
Good pick! I grew up in the Northeast.
Maybe i missed it, but where do you ski?
Bogus, Was that you I met yesterday?
Sorry, might’ve missed it, but what length did you get? How tall are you?
Thank you!!!
6'1" skie are 182cm
@@RicketySkiReviews thank you! Do you find the length ok? I’m also 6’1” ish (185cm), and 250lbs geared. Worried they might be too short. And don’t wanna go to the 189. Haha, with they made a 186, like the Blanks.
@@chrispavel1 I'm just a smidge larger and you are definitely a 189 customer!
@@bearclaw5115 thanks! I ended up buying the 189. They’re only a tiny bit longer than my 186 Blizzard Rustlers.
Still haven’t skied them yet… just got them.
I am 177 cm and i bought 189. Perfect lenght. So easy to turn and if you get into more choopy snow it goes over everything. I prefer longer Ski.
Perfect would be the Rossi Sender 110 free. You need to send those. Nick
I skied the black ops sender this past summer and reviewed it, but haven't been able to get on the Sender yet this season.
Rossi Sender 110 or Salomon106 ..I can’t decide
Would Cody Townsend steer us wrong? Heck no! Today, I just skied on my qst 106 echos and they are phenomenal. Of course the echos are geared more for the uphill, they still kicked ass on the down. Anyone interested in backcountry should check them out.
That's awesome, I didn't realize he was on them
@@RicketySkiReviews I'm a big fan of his UA-cam channel "The 50". Granted the peakbaggings are few and far between now that he has a kid and there are only a few hard ones left. But awesome content anyways.
I've skiied just about every width from 75 to 145 wide and yeah, the 100 +-5 mm range is probably my favorite if I could only own one ski... But I don't lol. Owning a carving ski and a pow ski is better if you can own 2 IMO. Nothing against the 106 tho, had a fun weekend on them last year just not enough to buy for me
“Closest thing to snowboarding on skiis”… my friend, you need to get on something properly wide and surfy then! When you can afford it, having something 110 underfoot is pretty incredible. No compromise
I mean these are 106 but I hear you, I will test out something wider, but I honestly liked the 106 in powder.
How about all that snow at Bogus! I’ve hit it twice this week.
It's been great 👍
I imagine you are mostly catering to folks who primarily ski groomers, but it would be nice to hear you, as well as other ski reviewers, provide more context when reviewing skis. I'd agree this ski is not a daily driver if you primarily ski groomers. However, this ski could be great for someone who prioritizes off-piste performance above groomer performance. There is just so much that goes into the decision of what type of ski to get from location, style of skiing, performance prioritization, etc. that all go into determining what ski would be best for someone...I'd just like to hear ski reviewers address that a bit more.
Wait what? I feel like that's all I talked about was off trail and powder performance. Majority of skiing footage was off trail?
i want to ski' better', and be just as stoked up! as elliott' thanks peace
Thanks for watching!
how do these compare to the draco freebird?
Great question, very different skis, but both have huge strengths. I have a full review on the draco freebirds here: ua-cam.com/video/2AUxIt2VFL8/v-deo.htmlsi=xUbxbw03TlZx9E5h
Biggest difference I noticed off hands obviously the freebirds feel much lighter and the flex pattern is quite different (not better or worse just different timing).
@@RicketySkiReviews Thanks! Loved both videos and also did you find the maneuverability to be similar?
Better than the Atomic Maverick 110?
haven't tried the new mavericks yet, the widest one was the 2024 100 ti's
Ok if like QST 106 will love the Dynastar MFree 108 hands down best ski if you a ex race you love them.......
get them in 192 too. trust me it's special
Awesome I will keep an eye out and see if I can get on them!
Elliott! As much of a QST fanboy as I am, I have to report that my buddy experienced the second QST failure that I have seen in 2 yrs. First was a binding ripping from the plate, second was a rip that started at the tip of the ski where the topsheet begins to bevel toward the sidewall. It progressed in one day of riding into complete topsheet delam at the tip and the sidewall/core splitting from the base/edge. Salomon's warranty is good, but I'm sad they aren't holding up well.
What season QST ski is having this delam problem?
Woah, good to know, I'll keep a close eye out, and report if I see anything happen.
@@jeffspicoli2643 Brand new 2024 ones. It is just one for delam. Another from the new model lost a binding. Same warranty, so he's out a pair on the second failure
@@_e5598 In the 10 years I've been with Salomon I have only seen a telemark binding pull out of a QST 106. If his alpine pulled out... that sounds like a bad mount. As far as the QST 106 delam... I have never had it happen to me but I have had 2 people have the issue. The circumstances are too great to know exactly why it did. That of course is a warranty issue if it falls within the warranty timeline and should be replaced. Again, the ski needs to be inspected to find out why also. Sorry you bud is out a pair of skis.
@jeffspicoli2643 first mount was shifts and Salomon replaced some binding parts as well as the skis on the first go around. The delam is brutally bad
There's really not much not to like about them on a soft snow day. There was only one thing that kept me from keeping my qsts. I thought they were a little bit heavy. Not much but just a little bit. But maybe that's my problem, because i'm only about one hundred and sixty pounds.
Yeah I could see that, I didn't notice it much out skiing in Idaho, but just carrying them I can see what you're saying.
@RicketySkiReviews I replaced them with the volkl blaze. Very satisfied. Lighter than qst, carves better on groomers (imo) , much livelier. Not quite as smooth or damp tho.
Would like to hear your opinion on the Blaze series eventually. They are pretty popular.
Before you even start talking about these skis.. I did demo them 2 seasons ago and I really enjoyed them.. I do know that they shortened the turn radius which does affect skis..
don't forget the flax;) and i love the way the bottom of the ski looks...
there is no metal but the ski is not reactive.. it plows through anything and is very stable and reliable.. tons of float.. very similar to my DPS Foundation RP 100.. my RP has a 15m turn radius and the tails are very catchy.. my guess is that the new shape of the QST 106 has a little larger turn radius.. i know my Enforcer 104 FRee has 17.5m turn radius and that is probably similar to the QST 106... and yes i just compared them to Enforcer.. don't beat me up;)
i saw your fall... i did break my arm on the skis.... saw Jesus.. He's doing fine..
they do chatter on rock hard groomers and they will slide on ice.. the day i had them there was 6 inches on ice.. within an hour it turned to crud and the skis were awwwww sum... the long radius and the ton of people on the hill (holiday) was what wore me out.. for me the skis are about surfing rather than carving.. where i broke my arm was on some tight moguls going through some tight trees.. I don't really recommend these skis for that.. i came out of the binding on top of a mogul which is kind of a fluke..
i didn't get a chance to ski them on wet snow but i would think that they would be fine.. my challenge to you is to ski them 8 more days and then make another video.. you can pick the conditions you want to ski them...
i agree with your score..
these or the qst blank?
Blank is pure powder ski. The 106 has more versatility on piste. If you have to ask, the answer is 106!
I can’t see how the ski behaves from that angle.
There will actually be a new video dropping tomorrow, with just different angles of this ski.
see , good haircut good karma ;)
Haha
Gud review ditch the porn music tho lol 😂
I like the music. Sophisticated stuff.
copyright free music can be tough to pick from, but I like this stuff, but your comment made me lol
Justis is the best ski.
Should be reviewing it in the next couple of weeks!
Skis look too short for you...