Aristophanes - Lysistrata (2004)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
- Aristophanes' Lyisistrata
March 18, 2004
Loyola University New Orleans
Directed by Donald Brady
Music and lyrics by J. Dan Stanley
Translation and original lyrics by Wilfred E. Major
CAST
Lysistrata: Alejandro Cejudo
Kalonike: Christina Ung
Myrrhine: Erin Left
Lampito: Anne Burgess
Secretary of Defense: Doug Caire
Kinesias: Ian Hoch
Ambassador from Sparta: William Schneider
Leader of Female Chorus: Kerri Driscoll
Leader of Male Chorus: Charles Ezeb
Female Chorus: Kathleen Doise, Jessica Lozano, HOlly Cassard
Male Chorus: Marcus Stanley, Jon Luke, J.J. Brennan
Female conspirators: Zoe Rutledge, Monica Harris, Mary Beth Kratky, Jessica Lucas
Male conspirators: Mattew Azcona, Kevin Smith, Andrew Lorenz
Assistant Director: Jeremy Ancalade
Choreography: Christina Ung
Scenic and Lighting Design: Joseph Harris
Costume Design: Kellie Grengs
Makeup and Hair Design: Mary Beth Kratky
Audio design: Marcus Stanley
Stage Manager: Kristi Jacobs
I really enjoy all the stage action. I'm doing a class on this play right now and getting to see it 'in action' is useful for understanding the context.
This is the only version on UA-cam that does it right.
"Where are you going to find a white stud?"
She found one. RAWR!
The next day, or perhaps some considerable time afterwards, the sex-strike devised at the beginning of the text, begins to take effect on the men 36:03
Fun, fun, fun!!! 𝜥α𝜆λισ𝛕ο𝛓
14:13 7:37 45:47
1:04:43
I’m curious where the poster found this video?
7:16
"No same sex marriage"?! Wtf why was that added in the end song. Is this a christian school?
I thiiiink it was a joke because afterwards they sad, "So let's kill strangers." Homosexuality was super common back then because it was thought that women weren't full human beings so the truest connection was between two men. Spartan soldiers were even paired together in couples because it made them fight harder. Also there is evidence of female homosexuality too. But I could be wrong and they're just bigoted.
The entire text of the original ignores both homosexuality and masturbation as potential solutions to the problem. I think without doing so the story falls apart so we are just supposed to suspend belief. But that line specifically is very odd.
Oh lol, seems like your guess of a Christian school was probably spot on. "Loyola University New Orleans is a private, co-educational, Jesuit university located in New Orleans, Louisiana. Originally established as Loyola College in 1904, the institution was chartered as a university in 1912." Apparently there is a whole debate about it. cardinalnewmansociety.org/loyola-university-new-orleans-faculty-senate-approves-proposal-for-same-sex-benefits/
Bingo!
"We are here to set our priorities straight. You frown on sex but you smile on killing. Is it really better to have blood spilling than to give 2 adults freedom of choice (couldnt make out the last part)"
They are trying to say that its fucked up that war is more acceptable than same sex marriage.
Again, like a number of other versions of this great play, it has been childishly done with a histrionic and blatantly pornagraphic obesity instead of the director resisting the temptation to showcase HIMSELF and allowing the writer’s story to shine through.
I don't know, man, "histrionic and blatantly porn[o]graphic" seems to be a pretty good description of Aristophanes' play as written.
@@trueroscoe Well, porn[o]graphic (my bad on the spelling, thanks) isn’t, I think, what Aristophanes was going for.
Nor do I think any would.
As any legitimate and true artist would do, I believe the writer was creating a great play with a sexually ‘corpulent’ atmosphere, hoping the director(s) who came afterward would utilize great self-discipline and self-control, with fine-tuned subtleties, allowing the “feel” of the sexual atmosphere to be invisibly absorbed by the audience rather than taking a high-power water cannon and attacking the poor viewers, drenching them with it.
@@globyoisthere is innuendos on every page, the stage directions in the script, on multiple occasions, refer to "hugely erect phallus" and people stripping naked (at least in my version). Just because the play is 2500 years old, doesn't mean it wasn't written by humans. Perhaps your view is correct, or maybe aristophanes just wanted people to laugh at crude humour. And honestly, if you're really an "artist", the message is pretty clear.
@@swazza_dazza8457 It was almost an intractable rule in the ancient Greek theater that the players do not show on stage graphic sex, or violence. They did have the capabilities for such gratuity, but the Greeks Of Old believed that it is best and more powerful to allow the audience to create the graphic part of the presentation rather than to display it on the stage with fake blood, animal parts made to look human, and bawdy, raunchy, T&A.
The true artist - and when I say the “true artist,” what I mean is one who has a superior and extra helping of real talent - utilizes rather than blatant utility.
Think of the overacting, bombastic, histrionics of a third rate community theater stage actor.
Then think of Ben Kingsley.
Think Wes Craven vs. Alfred Hitchcock, Halloween gift cards vs. Edgar Allen Poe, Stephenie Meyer vs, Bram Stoker.
You seem to have a preference for the former “artists” as well, I happen to prefer the latter.
But then, that’s just my particular tastes, yours is decidedly different, and all views are useful.
Thanks for responding.
sucks in general