The content is interesting, and the presenter or reader does neither himself nor any of his listeners - us, on UA-cam, or others who were his direct audience, then present - by being so rapid, breathless, and ill-spoken on the same. My personal emphasis of study is continental philosophy and german idealism, of which Husserl's phenomenology is an irreplacable preamble. All I can say for Mr. Carey is that his rapid and breathless hand-waving, delivered as apparently read directly from an essay rather than extemporaneously spoken, keys into an issue of perpetual complaint: that is, the vaunted and high-minded attitude of the speaker to the content of their essay or work at the expense of the comprehensive capacity of a diverse and plural audience, rather than the reverse. In other words, Carey does nothing, NOTHING, to improve a diverse and plural audience's access to philosophical content, regardless of this lecture being posted to UA-cam. Thanks to the channel for posting this lecture, but I am sure I hate it--rather, I hate the reader and his delivery. He's an utter failure of a public speaker, should stick to reading and writing only, and will serve public intellectualism better by retiring and never being recorded in this manner again than by what I can only imagine he had intended by this lecture in as horrid and awful a manner as this.
This is outstanding!! I'm almost finished reading Logical Investigations, and this addresses how (according to Husserl) the foundations of logic are located in noematic presentations so well.
One issue with intentionality as defined by Husserl: limit experiences, eg anxiety. Anxiety is similar to fear, except fear has its ‘object feared’. The structure of anxiety does not include any definite object, therefore it does not easily motivate bravery nor allow for definite acts of courage toward it.
I always thought that the target of anxiety was the unknown. If a person knows exactly what will happen in a given situation, is it still possible to feel anxious?
Heidegger took Husserl's definition and synthesized it with Kierkegaard's, I would refer to his definition for the most sublime phenomenological elucidation @@xenoblad As such, The Unknown is still an object it's just not a determined object.
I have read Husserl some years ago because a was fascinating by his pure research and, if can i say, his esthetics; but when i read it my sensation was of puzzle, ma impression was of an author never touch the issue and turn around one point wich meaning it's not so clear
This is complex but fascinating... talking about events in consciousness... I wonder what he did as practice to observe conscious experiences, this seems very much like vipassana, mindfulness. Does it become a practical therapeutic use?
@nihilgeist666 I disagree philosophy mostly has practical implications leading to politics and moral and ethical values... science was natural philosophy religion is based on philosophy
Wait! I thought Hegel wrote the firet book on Phenomenology? And even he was simply reacting to Kant, whose philosophy is permeated with the germs of Phenomenology!
The content is interesting, and the presenter or reader does neither himself nor any of his listeners - us, on UA-cam, or others who were his direct audience, then present - by being so rapid, breathless, and ill-spoken on the same.
My personal emphasis of study is continental philosophy and german idealism, of which Husserl's phenomenology is an irreplacable preamble. All I can say for Mr. Carey is that his rapid and breathless hand-waving, delivered as apparently read directly from an essay rather than extemporaneously spoken, keys into an issue of perpetual complaint: that is, the vaunted and high-minded attitude of the speaker to the content of their essay or work at the expense of the comprehensive capacity of a diverse and plural audience, rather than the reverse. In other words, Carey does nothing, NOTHING, to improve a diverse and plural audience's access to philosophical content, regardless of this lecture being posted to UA-cam.
Thanks to the channel for posting this lecture, but I am sure I hate it--rather, I hate the reader and his delivery. He's an utter failure of a public speaker, should stick to reading and writing only, and will serve public intellectualism better by retiring and never being recorded in this manner again than by what I can only imagine he had intended by this lecture in as horrid and awful a manner as this.
This is outstanding!! I'm almost finished reading Logical Investigations, and this addresses how (according to Husserl) the foundations of logic are located in noematic presentations so well.
One issue with intentionality as defined by Husserl: limit experiences, eg anxiety. Anxiety is similar to fear, except fear has its ‘object feared’. The structure of anxiety does not include any definite object, therefore it does not easily motivate bravery nor allow for definite acts of courage toward it.
I always thought that the target of anxiety was the unknown.
If a person knows exactly what will happen in a given situation, is it still possible to feel anxious?
Heidegger took Husserl's definition and synthesized it with Kierkegaard's, I would refer to his definition for the most sublime phenomenological elucidation @@xenoblad As such, The Unknown is still an object it's just not a determined object.
@@xenobladyeah if you know it's coming
slow it down , its a academic side show !!!!
I noticed I have been watching my lattern for three hours now.
Teachers like this need to slowww down dude.
18:56
I have read Husserl some years ago because a was fascinating by his pure research and, if can i say, his esthetics; but when i read it my sensation was of puzzle, ma impression was of an author never touch the issue and turn around one point wich meaning it's not so clear
Some of these points are rushed through quickly but with a great lecture nonetheless
I think this raises an interesting point, subscribed.
What interesting point does it raise?
@@nihilgeist666all of them
@@OneStepToDeath420 You are too stupid to insult!
He should NOT talk this fast on a subject like phenomenology.
You've never done a philosophy degree then lol
Very dull presentation, like he's reading a shopping list.
The question is: do the items on the list exist independently of his conception of them!
There is a velocity control on the configuration icon.
@@benjoynson4314 what the hell makes you say that? There are plenty of fine professors who don't rush through a lecture like this guy did.
Excuse me, what did you say!!!
This is complex but fascinating... talking about events in consciousness... I wonder what he did as practice to observe conscious experiences, this seems very much like vipassana, mindfulness. Does it become a practical therapeutic use?
No, it's philosophy,, of course it's not practical...
@nihilgeist666 I disagree philosophy mostly has practical implications leading to politics and moral and ethical values... science was natural philosophy religion is based on philosophy
See the works of Evan Thompson, especially Mind and Life.
@@nihilgeist666 here, I grant you this L
Bad video, the presenter rushes way too much. It's read from a script, too, and it's easy to tell. Slow down!!!!!
Wait! I thought Hegel wrote the firet book on Phenomenology? And even he was simply reacting to Kant, whose philosophy is permeated with the germs of Phenomenology!
Different “phenomenology”
@@Haveuseenmyjetpacko good grief
The seeds of it are in Descartes already
The number of pseudo intellectuals posing as "philosophers" that pretend to understand this word salad is too high!
By the same token, there are too many people trying to glorify antitheticalism by virtue of inconsequential grandstanding, nihilgeist
@@majorlycunningham5439 What the hell is antitheticalism?
@@nihilgeist666 contrarianism
@@rioharada-parr6974 Bullshit! Words have definite meanings. Anything else is poetry!
@@mikecaetano Why didn't you just say that? Also, what's wrong with contrarianism? Also, why do you keep sniffing my farts?