Duality: Sin & Virtue

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 34

  • @sukhdeepkaur1772
    @sukhdeepkaur1772 6 місяців тому +1

    Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh🙏🏽🙏🏽❤️🙏🏽❤️🙏🏽❤️

  • @TheTurbanatore
    @TheTurbanatore 7 років тому +12

    Everything is the One, there is no other

  • @KashmirSingh-xt5dc
    @KashmirSingh-xt5dc 6 років тому +3

    WAHEGURU. The english version has truly benefited me and many others all over. Thanks.

  • @Prince-vw5hl
    @Prince-vw5hl 7 років тому +2

    Ur goin gonna be the next jagraj singh from basics of sikhi. He taught so many especially the sikhs outside born abroad in a sikh family how to understand sikhi. I gurantee ur channel is gonna grow like crazy.

  • @kalyansinghbagga1948
    @kalyansinghbagga1948 7 років тому +3

    WAHEGURU JI KA KHALSA WAHEGURU JI KI FATEH

  • @russellsage4953
    @russellsage4953 2 роки тому

    This🔥🔥🔥
    One sees it in police and thieves. They look like Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers to me. The looks one gets when bringing up these things is telling it doesn’t change a thing. When one pulls back and see with compassionate detachment, this things feel more possible to know deeply. In the Holy Gita, it simply concludes…you do your duty regardless without all the violent emotion. This is also Sikh. Playing your role, but not becoming this role because your role is to not be drawn to the periphery of the truth but rather to the cause and core of it.

  • @aavocadoToast
    @aavocadoToast 7 років тому

    Thanks for explaining its a complex topic

  • @jessem4653
    @jessem4653 7 років тому +3

    I still have difficulty with this. Do we say that, for instance, rape is not good or bad, that it is just part of the universe? Why do we have our morality, the morality prescribed to us in the Guru's teachings, if there is no good or bad? My apologies for my lack of understanding.

    • @TheUltimateGeminiHasSurvived
      @TheUltimateGeminiHasSurvived 7 років тому +1

      Yeah, this is kind of an advanced subject. But how come I'm able to distinguish between what's right and wrong. How come I can make decisions and refuse things that will corrupt my mind such as ego and greed?

    • @jasbirkaurvillaschi8019
      @jasbirkaurvillaschi8019 7 років тому +2

      there is no duality in the universe in reality(sat) however to balance out our ego's tendency to drive us to 'self-ish ' behaviours (desires/lust, anger, greed, pride,attachment) through sleight of hand of convincing us of a duality we rebalance our worldview by habituating positive , altruistic, all- accepting unconditional love driven thought, words and actions into our daily existence . This prevents us from being convinced as we see through our thoughts, actions and words in the guru advised corrective way their 'ripples' of effect, just how Akal Purakh IS and thus how we are.( kind of like a perfectly still body of water reflects the sky perfectly so the mind is confused as to where one begins and the other ends )

    • @mos619
      @mos619 6 років тому

      I would say that rape is an act of ego, very selfish and dualistic. The morality comes as natural consequences of unity. You see all as one, you love all and work to be benefit all. It's what's in balance vs what's out of balance...which is never truly out of balance but can be muddied and complexified beyond what's necessary. Like an equation, you can have a complex set of operations on one side, but the other side of the equal sign is always one and how much you see and act with that understanding determines the complications and sufferings in your life.
      Just my thoughts

  • @MrSkePticaL123
    @MrSkePticaL123 7 років тому

    gonna take me a while to grasp this concept but I agree with the idea of there being opposites in most things. like in physics every action has an equal and opposite reaction. am I right in thinking that the logic behind this concept dictates that for every good there is a bad.

  • @Arentjansz
    @Arentjansz 3 роки тому

    VGJKK VGJKF🙏🏾💥. Ikind of need more video's abt this Please,,,,,,,my short mind do not get iT totally, for example happenings in punjab/Delhi with farmers and the kindda of inhuman trekt and kwast of that governmnt. I REALLY CAN NOT CONSIDER THIS OKAY FROM MY human perspective, i get confused By this teachings in this video, Benti request for more explanation Pleas, sahib kaur frm amsterdam

  • @heavymetaldeath4life
    @heavymetaldeath4life 7 років тому +7

    Okay, but this sounds like moral nihilism. If there's no such thing as good and bad, why is the One described in terms of goodness only? If good and bad are the same, why didn't the Gurus use bad terms to describe the One? We are told the One is full of love, but doesn't it make sense to say the One is also full of hate? Wouldn't that contradict the mool mantar?

    • @NanakNaam
      @NanakNaam  7 років тому +21

      Great questions. Gurbani has also talked about the One being the destroyer of all things, the creator of Maya and the creator of the ego. The One can't be good or bad as these concepts are inherently subjective. However any positive attributes that have been attributed to the One in Gurbani could simply be due to the experience of bliss that the enlightened beings have when they realise that One.

    • @vjagpal
      @vjagpal 7 років тому +14

      That is indeed a great question. Easy way to understand is that realm of 1 (God) is absolute (without duality or cause & effect), however we humans only understand relativity/duality (unless someone in Brahmgayani).
      Now Guru is doing a tough job of explaining an absolute being (1) to a perceived relative being (us) using a relative language. So describing 1 using good words can put follower on right path and eventually understand the absolute nature of 1 beyond Good/bad or other dual terms. While bad words most likely will harm the follower.

    • @NanakNaam
      @NanakNaam  7 років тому +5

      V J very well said. Thank you

    • @orangeblue01
      @orangeblue01 7 років тому +3

      Your explanation was very much convincing and I have to say those words have cleared a sort of anxiety in me regarding this exact question. Thank you very much for the answer and to the questioner as well for asking it. However I still have a question. The first part was explained in a very good way, that is why didn't the Gurus use bad language to describe Paramatma. That is because we as beings who are used to duality need to be explained with good terms and later when we progress on the path of Oneness, we will see that it is just one and there is no duality. But it is also true that the One is filled with love. Isn't this duality? Like the questioner said, then isn't he full of hate as well? How can this be explained?

    • @vjagpal
      @vjagpal 7 років тому +3

      Wow, another good question. So lets talk about love. Love as we know in world is for sure a idealistic attribute with hate the other side of it. We mistakenly believe that Guru sahib is talking about worldly love AKA ishq-mizaji. Mizaji means it comes as neutral attribute due to maya (materialistic existence). Ishq-mizaji can have mayak attributes (kaam, krooth, loobh, mooh, and ahankar) hence can have an opposite as hate. This in not the love Guru talking about.
      What Guru is talking about is called Ishq-Haqiki. Haqiki is same as "sat" and does not have mayak attribute. Ishq-Haqiki does not hate opposites (or differences) but accepts the whole existence as hukum. under Ishq-Haqiki a sword is only picked to protect & serve. Both war & service is done as hukum not hate or favor.
      I hope this answers the question.

  • @LLNB2196
    @LLNB2196 7 років тому

    Nice video but does it mean I can't do good nor bad things? I mean for example it's said that a sikh should not hate anyone and that we should be full of love.. How can this be seen as one and the same? I know that this is very very difficult for our minds to understand. It would be nice if you could talk about it a bit more

    • @vjagpal
      @vjagpal 7 років тому +5

      I think first we need to understand and realize the "I" in "I can't do good nor bad things?". If the "I" in question is same as 1 (the pure awareness/ enlightened being) then yes there are no good or bad things. But if this realization have not been achieved yet and "I" is the body/mind then good & bad will depend on many other factors such as culture, religion, time period, social status etc.
      To my understanding, if the realization of 1ness has been achieved, the question "I can't do good nor bad things? " will have no place to exist. Or say this is will be an invalid question. I hope this helps.