Communists are Fascists - Westbrook Pegler, 1937

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 тра 2012
  • August 1937
    William F. Buckley Jr., "Rabble-Rouser: When Westbrook Pegler Wrote a Column, Nobody Was Safe," New Yorker
    www.newyorker.com/archive/2004...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 12

  • @Coffeeandasmoke
    @Coffeeandasmoke 12 років тому +6

    Said much the same myself. Can't tell one jackbooted thug from the other.

  • @EvilsOfFeminism
    @EvilsOfFeminism 12 років тому

    However, I think you are correct. One only has to look at old Christendom to see that its authority was very decentralized, and I would like to see a similar system of decentralized government return.

  • @TheSovietSuperpower
    @TheSovietSuperpower 12 років тому +1

    There can be Socialism and Nationalism being 2 powerful forces within a country, but National Socialism is the name which the Nazis chose for their Fascist party, and so therefore in common debate and discussion National Socialism is typically (almost always) equated to Fascism.

  • @davidlogansr8007
    @davidlogansr8007 3 роки тому +4

    Add them up, divide by two and see if you don’t get the same practical result. (On Communists and Fascists:) Westbrook Pegler was RIGHT!

  • @HooDatDonDar
    @HooDatDonDar 9 років тому

    Basically, fascism is the Lenin system of social control, based on nationalism, rather than bogus Marxist theories of exploitation. The man who founded it said as much, and he was a follower of Lenin before the war. It does not have to be a racial nationalism, tho the most successful movement of that type, the Nazis, was very racist indeed.
    In 1980, lefty mush head Susan Sontag came to basically the same conclusion as this man. Pegler was basically one of the first shock jocks, mainly interested in stirring things up to sell papers. But he was an outspoken opponent of the Hitler regime. Dig up an essay of his called 'Suffer Little Children' also called 'The Jewish Children', written in 1935. He really lets Hitler have it.

  • @kimberHD45
    @kimberHD45 12 років тому +1

    Based on what? your comment flies in the face of fact. National socialism was synomonous with fascism, they were merely functions of the same political ideology. Explain how you can separate national socialism, the forced wealth redistibution and economic controls that violate natural property rights, and the fascist regimes who utilize it, and other autocratic policies, that infringe on all sorts of other freedoms.

  • @GenwealthPartners
    @GenwealthPartners 3 роки тому +1

    Both are a byproduct of money printing.

  • @GottfriedFeder
    @GottfriedFeder 12 років тому

    Watch the videos of the citizens of the German NS regime! Those were happy people. That's the difference to all other regimes since the Christianisation of Europe. We Germans had only 12 good years since the sinking of Atlantis (ca. 1220 BCE).

  • @EvilsOfFeminism
    @EvilsOfFeminism 12 років тому +3

    As a German, I have less of an issue with fascism than I do with the present Jew-run occult world order system. Liberty and freheit are nice and all, but I put the survival of my own Folk first.

  • @GottfriedFeder
    @GottfriedFeder 12 років тому

    One should not mistake fascism with National Socialism. National Socialism is anti-fascist. The German people have fought fascism since millennia.