Solid State Physics in a Nutshell: Topic 9-1: Bloch Theorem and the Central Equation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 19

  • @Moeman-mf5yq
    @Moeman-mf5yq 4 місяці тому +2

    Only REAL explanation on the whole of youtube. Fuckin ace!

  • @g0rthaur
    @g0rthaur 6 років тому +5

    Thank you for your effort and uploading this video to make it public for a world wide audience, it really helped me studying for my exam!

  • @christianmaestre111
    @christianmaestre111 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much for this. I have an incoming exam. This helps a lot.

  • @robertfennis6088
    @robertfennis6088 8 років тому +2

    8:20 I looked at solutions of wave equations at band edges but I consistantly find that the solutions of the bloch functions for k+G are very different. Which should make sense because these eigen states have different energies. However, since I doubt that I am discovering A fundamental flaw in QM, I guess my reasoning is wrong. Could you help me?

  • @irenevillarrodriguez622
    @irenevillarrodriguez622 5 років тому +3

    I was wondering how at min @, you went from having C_k in the potential term to C_(k-G). Thank you!

  • @ProfessorKInGkiWI
    @ProfessorKInGkiWI 2 роки тому

    For anyone searching for the reference at 5:56 it is video 5-4

  • @thedomestomp
    @thedomestomp 7 років тому +5

    The guy sounds like Jack from Jack-in-the-Box lol. Good video!!

  • @asaf2323
    @asaf2323 2 роки тому

    Can someone explain what is the meaning of a k point?

  • @minhokim8263
    @minhokim8263 8 років тому

    Wonderful, Beautiful!

  • @minhokim8263
    @minhokim8263 8 років тому

    Multiplication in spatial r domain becomes to Convolution in inverse lattice or k domain. Nothing but a Modulation.

  • @elahehakhoundi7570
    @elahehakhoundi7570 5 років тому +1

    This was very helpful. thanks a bunch :)

    • @xgozulx
      @xgozulx 5 років тому

      Did you meant...thanks a BLOnCH
      I had to xD

  • @alaaakkoush1135
    @alaaakkoush1135 6 років тому

    In 6:43, why should we care about C of k+g1 , if the central equation only has C of k and C k-g1??

    • @amanpawar_ap
      @amanpawar_ap 6 років тому +1

      Because we have sum over G vectors, vec(g1) is one vector and Vec(-g1) is other.

  • @aitorgarcia1147
    @aitorgarcia1147 8 років тому +1

    This video is really nice! Although it's not entirely clear the statement (9.1). could phi_k+G contain a phase factor?

    • @aitorgarcia1147
      @aitorgarcia1147 8 років тому

      For instance, if you chose a planewave as your phi_k(r)=exp(ikr), then phi_k_G(r)=exp(i(k+G)) clearly introduces the phase factor exp(iGr), which in principle is only when r is a translation vector T

    • @amanpawar_ap
      @amanpawar_ap 6 років тому

      the bloch wave function is u_k(r).exp(ikr) not just planewave exp(ikr). The results in this video are explicitly only for bloch case.

  • @AbdolazimHasseli
    @AbdolazimHasseli 5 років тому +10

    Too fast. Annoying.