Please watch the video ALL the Way! The issue isn't with UA-cam. UA-cam is following a LAW. We need to change the LAW as it is. Please check these links after the video: Sign our Petition: chng.it/kLnwsSJzFv Write a comment to the FTC: bit.ly/31XAEXJ Suggested Talking Points for Viewers: bit.ly/2Wptf1U Suggested Talking Points for Creators: bit.ly/31SwLmI
NerdE, we have a problem. I tried to post my comment on the FTC, but every time, it kept saying, "Please correct all errors to continue" and it said I left the comments section blank even though I typed it. Is anyone else having this problem?
Honestly, it’s the parents Job to monitor what THEIR child watches instead of using UA-cam as a babysitter. UA-cam is killing itself. 3/4 of the channels I watch are arts and crafts channels, and the fact that UA-cam finds art childish is SAD. We are all behind you. Keep fighting! in the end, all I know is that the FTC is about to get A LOT of angry yet educational emails.
In this case, it’s not really UA-cam’s fault, they are trying to cover their own butt, they can’t exactly snub the FTC and keep going on the same way. I agree completely that it should be on the parents to control what their kids watch. It’s rubbish that UA-cam got fined for this. Like, they can’t control when a parent just hands their device to their kid, why is it their fault now?!
More that they don't understand how wide reaching the consequences will be. I prefer watching UA-cam over TV these days, and gaming/crafting/toy review channels are the main things I watch. So, I'm not happy about this, and sometimes I feel like I'm just waiting for UA-cam to shut down because everyone worth watching has been forced off.
Huh. Who wants to bet Twitch’s content EXPLODES in January, after the entire arts & crafts community are driven off of UA-cam? Also: as a parent, it is MY RESPONSIBILITY to be mindful of the media (including adverts) that my child consumes. It is NOT UA-cam’s (or anyone else’s) responsibility, rightly or wrongly, to decide what is appropriate for my child to view. As in all things, I’m responsible to make sure that I’m vetting what my child does, or I don’t deserve to be a parent.
This has made me want to do Twitch more now and my viewers if they like the content can decide to support me by sending bits and subs my way which is better then getting zip for being an under dog here on UA-cam with only 300 subs.
I'm so angry that they think that art and drawing is automatically child directed. I draw for a living and love my job and commissioners and personally I feel offended by this
not to mention a lot of traditional artists use alcohol based pens, which cannot be sold to kids but I'm sure that would be overlooked. My art style looks kid friendly but the character stories contain violence, so certainly not for kids.
Im glad more people feel this way, this actually strongly discouraged me from posting my art speed pints i make when i draw. I was going to, but seeing this i dont want to anymore.
Hi Jacki, it was nice meeting you at vidsummit this year. Thank you for making this video. This is really scary stuff for all of us creators. I will make a video as well about it on my channel to bring awareness.
So basically because there are parents who can’t monitor their own children now UA-cam has to pay for it & ultimately the creators and we the audience also have to suffer
"Child appealing content"....dude, everything is appealing to kids! When I was young I watched the walking dead and my little pony back to back! Kids like everything these days! Dang Coppa...
Ya my dad was watching the walking dead when I hade a night mare and I saw him on the couch but didn’t know what the tv show was so I started watching and then I got soo scared I still rember till this day
How about if parents step up and “parent” and take responsibility for their own children rather than let the government punish the rest of us because they are incapable of doing so.
Sadly lots of parents nowadays give their kids tablets or their phones too keep them quiet, my aunt does that with her daughter. I’m the one that monitors what my cousin watches because her mom couldn’t care less as long a she’s quiet and staying still. They think of tablets and phone as some sort of “babysitter”
As a parent, I whole heartily agree. My son isn't even two yet, but I make sure he watches good quality content. He loves watching cartoons, musicals. He does not watch anything dealing with fighting, gore, excessive violence, swearing etc... His dad lets him watch police chases, he loves the sounds of sirens and his reactions are adorable.
@@pinkusdean1178 exactly! The FTC is throwing their weight around and twisting what COPPA is actually for. COPPA is in place to help protect children under the age of 13 from getting their personal information taken and the FTC is waaaayy over stepping it.
This basically means that almost all videos that me (Age 28) watch is targeted to children and I might lose my favorite creators. Like: you : moriah Elizabeth : dollightful : simply nailogical... and many more
@Ayumu Gacha Studios But if only bots are picking content like toy rewind or nail tutorial is it not possible that she is going to be hurt by system. Like nail painting is technically kids friendly... I don't believe she is going to be hurt but there is possibility. What I are most worried is dollightful because it's dolls she is handling even its not intent for kids. But it's not like I have really yet looked hard into this thing so all I can say is that I think so
Im in the same place... Most of what i watch is considered kid friendly crafting... Ive already noticed and read some in private groups, this kind of act and enforcment of it will be horrible to the autistic community bc many have what can be considered very childish hobbies and interests. Those changes wont be good for people who thrive off routines.
Wait- So if your video is "family friendly" it will be tagged as child friendly, but if you make a video that isn't "family friendly" you get demonitized? So how is anyone supposed to make a living on UA-cam anymore??
Maanasi Halemane what the frick? You don’t care about Nerde and all you care about is Moriah Elizabeth? You cold at least say “Guys we need to help Moriah. Her channel needs the comments and freedom”. Nerdecrafter is a good friend of Moriah and I think she would be horrified if Nerde was put in the kids category
But Like...UA-cam Kids Doesn’t Have As Many Videos I Watch On A Daily Basis Sometimes They Don’t Have Family Friendly Channels I Watch On There! So I Would Prefer Regular UA-cam Rather Than UA-cam Kids
UA-cam demonetizes adult content and “children’s” content. I think it’s time for a new platform. I mean I know this isn’t just UA-cam, it’s a law but still. It’s getting out of control.
Kittybug 247 that’s not what this is. This is damage control for money they lost themselves. They targeted ads to kids, and that’s why they got fined. Not because parents let their kids watch what they want.
This is about targeted ads towards children. Children who's data is collected and then they are served ads which they aren't developed enough to understand are ads. It's not about parents not parenting and children watching content that's too mature for their age.
If parents don't like what their kids see, then they need to learn to step in and *PARENT* for once in their lives. Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.
I have submitted my letter and voiced my concerns. I have wanted to become a content creator for a while now. I teach history and I want to create a history channel that is not only educational but also I would love to include projects that anyone can do to help reinforce the lesson or are time period appropriate. The new possible regulations has paused this endeavor. It is my hope that the FTC will listen to our collective voices. I love you Jackie. You are a inspiration. You are entertaining. You help me as a single mom with a limited income make better buying choices. You are not alone. We will fight this battle with you.
As a crafting creator, parent to two young children, and a viewer... I left a BIG OL’ comment. The point you and Jeremy made about parental consent was an aspect I hadn’t thought of and as a parent, it got me even more riled up. If I give my consent for my kids to use my UA-cam account, that is my choice. And I frequently watch crafting videos WITH my kids. Some of these rules feel like if I took my kids to the park and I told them it was okay for them to go climb the plastic rockwall and a stranger came over and took them off the rockwall because it’s too dangerous. Excuse me, I am their parent and their parenting is MY responsibility, not yours. Mind ya bidness. Thanks for sharing this topic and some ways we can help! ~Raven
My kids are the REASON I found Jackie in the first place. My youngest saw a thumbnail on my phone with Angel and screamed with delight. We've binged everything Jackie has made, and I don't know how often we've seen the videos featuring Angel. Through all that content, I've never once felt like my kids were being targeted. This whole situation is ridiculous, and you bet I sent a BIG 'OL comment as well. You keep doin' you Raven.
I completely agree with you. The reason this is even a thing is because of parents that don't want to have the responsibility of researching what their kids are watching. That's why they need a very ineffective algorithm to tell them what's appropriate or not.
But the new regulations aren't stopping you from watching UA-cam with your kids. They are just regulating the targeted advertising. Television does the same thing. In your park analogy it would be like if you took your kid to the park and before they could play they had to be subjected to several demonstrations of toys and food they're going to be likely to want. What if the only demonstrations were extremely violent toys and junk food? How would you feel about your kid playing at the park then? It's not the content that's being restricted it's the advertising. (The negative effects upon the channels obviously suck, but it's important kids are protected)
@@sarahwarmington3172 Yeah, of course, but I suppose my point is that it's my responsibility as a parent to step in if those kinds of things are being shown to my kids. I don't want some third party deciding what is and isn't okay for my kids, that's what I should be doing. I agree that kids need to be protected but that's first and foremost, my job as a parent and not someone else's. Not every parent has the same standards for what their kids need to be protected from.
Hey everyone! I watched a lot of videos about this, spreading my homework with you all. Essentially, the response by UA-cam was NOT required of them by the law. The COPPA law actually recommended an Age Gate to sequester children away without affecting the rest of the channels. Also, there is a line (16 C.F.R Section 312.2 if you care) within the law that protects general audience channels from litigation. UA-cam chose not to do the Age Gate, and UA-cam chose to to the For/Not For kids click button without any middle ground, and install an automated flagging system. This is NOT an FTC and COPPA problem. This is a UA-cam problem. COPPA is however trying to fight for the idea that Channel Owners are operators of their own site, and not you tube. THIS is the point that needs to be fought with the FTC. Sources from Lawyer Channels Ian Corzine: "COPPA INSIDER Update!!! What MORE UA-cam Is HIDING " Hoeg Law: "COPPA Complications: UA-cam Responds (also - No, they don’t have to train you) (VL138) " and "How the FTC’s Latest Guidance on COPPA Fails UA-cam Content Creators (but not the FTC) (VL139)" Not a Lawyer Folding Ideas: "What's Gone Wrong With the FTC's COPPA Agreement With UA-cam "
It's like they're going over to a random school and saying "No riding bicycles!" Even though the school isn't their property and they don't even know what bikes are.
"What? Blame the parents? What does that mean?" Seriously, people never want to blame the parents, even if they're clearly at fault. Also, some commenters under the petition said that they'd rather have their kids watch a targeted ad about toys than whatever the heck UA-cam could throw at them randomly. Not all ads are designed for children, they can get scared of the smallest things, like a creepy face.
..i have a good question,why even let kids on internet?? they are too young for it. we didnt have youtube when we were kids, we played outside or outside with toys.
Parents love giving a phone or tablet to their child instead of paying attention to them because they'd rather keep them quiet than spending time with them.
BlackPearl -.-‘ I sit with my kids and watch un godly amounts of child shows with them to make sure they are age appropriate. I don’t let them watch UA-cam by themselves. :/ please don’t put us all in one group.
I don't know why nerde and other craft and kid like channels aren't something parents don't want their kids watching vs jack Paul are we sure it was Evan adults that complain or adults like creators wanting kids off of UA-cam so their content can make money
No. Google is paying a fine because they broke the law. No different than you or I getting caught for speeding, Google and it's data mining has been intrusive enough that it's implemented data from children under the protected age of 13, for advertising targets. There are no laws specifying the age, race, species of mammal or otherwise, that prevent children under 13 from viewing videos on UA-cam. However the collection of data on ANYONE is Google's responsibility alone as there's no physical hand off from the user to Google, who in essence steals it. Despite the innocents of declaring what data is obtained, buried under several pages of finely printed links, that's no excuse for violating consumer protections.
@@thisguy3500 but they are mining the data based on the videos the children are watching, using their parent's account, correct? How would Google know what age the children are before they collect the data?
Pretty much. Which is absolutely ludicrous due to the fact that not all of the Art&Crafts is for kids. It's a very broad community and can be for everyone.
YES. EXACTLY. IF A CHILD CLICKS "IM 18 OR OVER" ON A PORN SITE, THEN IT IS NOT THE PORN SITES FAULT. IT IS THE FAULT OF THE PARENT. (just an example dont kill me.)
There is absolutely nothing that isn't "appealing " to children, they are nosy little buggers and want to know everything they may get 2 minutes into a video and decide its not what they want but they also may not. It is the place of parents to know what their child is doing and what you tubes they are watching. It is the place of parents to not let kids watch things on their accounts.
Remember me between the age of 10 -12, risking my very life to sneak into my parent's bedroom and going through my dad's drawers until I struck pay dirt with a copy of Playboy's 1971 issue, I can only imagine as a millennial, the lengths that I would go through to seek out and explore my targeted content on the internet ...... "Yes, I am 18" not to mention some of the content here on this very site ....... I'd be spending equal time with the data being collected for me that I would be deleting all emails asking me if I'm lonely tonight before my parents found out so that I could live to see 13.
I don’t understand how they can sum up all of these “child-like” things- it’s so broad when they say colorful videos are child directed. Not only that, but art has so many forms that it can’t be defined as one “genre”. This whole thing infuriated me and I hope that the problem will be solved❤️
Kee Kee I completely agree with this because most of the channels I watch are arts and crafts like Jackie, etc. . I mean what was the point of UA-cam Kids If parents are letting children use regular UA-cam as a pose to UA-cam Kids.
This. Ok I'm a parent of THREE kids. I make damn sure they dont watch inappropriate content. Sure every so often they'll click in something bad but that's on me to intervene and tell them no. You hire Micheal to babysit your kids and come home wondering why theyre all d**d.
@@proxyhacker89 exactly! That's why we do appropriate movies when at home and in the car she can watch UA-cam but I'm always listening & paying attention to what's on !
@@zirconiaprime4767 as a parent I believe parents are held responsible when it comes to things like this. If it's a reoccurring problem with your kids maybe revoke UA-cam from your child. It's simple!
This. UA-cam/other websites should not be holding these parents hands on regulating stuff like this. If they let their kid use their account, then everything falls back on the parents for not watching them.
This just makes me sick! I used to use UA-cam as like therapy and as a creative outlet. Now I feel like I should just delete everything because I am terrified of being fined:(
Ah yes, once again, "Let's make decisions about things we know nothing about!" So art, basically, is now considered child-directed? Well, screw all the adult-oriented artists. Also characters being "child-directed" is just weird. It's super vague, as characters can have many different portrayals. As I'm big into Transformers, I'll use it as my example. While they are usually toys for kids, some of the comic-based content is really skirting the lines to stay child friendly. They can be extremely violent, to the point I would not want a young child reading them. But I do love the characters and have/will make fanart of them. I'll definitely leave a comment. These rules are ridiculous.
If animation is “Child Directed” there are so many inappropriate animations on UA-cam if the machine is like “Oh it has animation in it, it must be for children” This is seriously going to be a problem if animation is going to be “Child Directed”
Here’s my argument: UA-cam is supposed to be a place where we can express ourselves and have a say but what now... you’re getting rid of most things people have access to. So what if it’s a craft kit. Your evaluating everything telling us to NOT waste money or how this is good education!
And if we get rid of everything that is child directed witch will be demonized and if your getting rid of everything that isn’t appropriate for adults and it is demonized what are we supposed to post? Science facts well if there’s bright colors its child directed so even though this was not intended to do this and have SO many comments demanding other wise just think.
Also, what constitutes a “child?” I’m 15. Would I be considered a child because I’m underaged? Or would I be considered an adult because I as an individual have the mental capacity and maturity of most adults? I am not a creator, but I know from other videos that viewers will be effected by these changes too. Because I watch Nerdecrafter, Dollightful, Moriah Elizabeth, etc, will I not be able to watch “adult” content that I love as well? I’m in that middle category where I’m treated as an adult, but I am not yet legally one. How am I supposed to be happy using this platform if it is unclear how I will be designated? How am I supposed to be happy if I have to choose between “child appealing” and “adult” content?
I'm turning 17 in a month and practically a year away from being considered an adult. Us teenagers are getting to where we are coming from childhood to adulthood and are stuck in between. Be still aren't considered adults but a lot of us end up having the mind capacity and maturity as one. I know since I was too at an early age of my early teens and still being such. People though I was a couple years older than I was because of my maturity. Now I like the fact that we might get better adult content on UA-cam but the fact that they are doing this to the Arts & Crafts community isn't right. Seeing that it can be for everyone,not all of it is going to be considered kid friendly. It's a very broad community and it needs to be seen as such. I too love those creators as well as Jackie. Besides how can Jackie and some of those creators be considered for children only when they sometimes sneak in those dirty jokes that most kids probably won't get and shouldn't get. There's should be content for everyone,but you have to find a way to make it work.
I was also thinking this... Seeing as I am also 15 and it's weird... I feel as though I am a mature adult-ish type person, I feel as though I have a child-ish side as well. I know I am of a mind to understand that what I am watching is NOT for children but it isn't exactly something... I can't watch. I feel as though this is an issue we need to think hard and long on!!!
@@mixitup6805 You are breaking the ToS of UA-cam. "In any case, you affirm that you are over the age of 13, as the Service is not intended for children under 13. If you are under 13 years of age, then please do not use the Service." You are part of the problem.
I say people flood youtube and ftc mailboxes with this content with the question "this is cartoon is it kid friendly?" Or those super violent anime shows...
This whole thing is going to make youtube less family friendly overall because family friendly content creators will be less incentivised to CREATE content. UA-cam has been fighting creators tooth and nail to make their videos more family friendly, and now they're DEMONITIZING family friendly videos, so what is it youtube? Do you or do you not want family friendly content? Well guess you're gonna have to start swearing in your vids Jackie lol 😂 I watch a lot of commentary channels like Spill which are DEFFINITLY not child directed but the narrator uses a cartoon character as an avatar instead of a face cam. Does that now make Spill, a drama channel that discusses such things as harassment, sexual abuse, etc etc, a child directed channel because she uses an animated character???
UA-cam: so you can not swear or do things that is not family friendly. Or else you get punisht. UA-cam 2020/ftc : you can not be family friendly or else you get punisht
I just started my channel a little bit ago. I wanted to share with kids, my age , younger, and older, that it’s okay to be younger when your older and that in a world of craziness that being a nerd is okay. I love it and it busies my free time...but know I can’t do what I love!
Me too, but I’m not an adult yet, but the things I watch are like Moriah Elizabeth and UnspeakableGaming. (Just so you know, I’m not ten even though it might sound like it.)
What I commented: Dear FTC, I am a viewer and a small content creator here on UA-cam. Many of the UA-camrs make their money and everyday meal from making child content. But your law will stop them from making such content which will eventually break down their family. As a content creator, I know how hard it is to work everyday for millions of people and make videos. But due to your law, all of our hard work we put into the videos for sooo many years, will go into waste in just a matter of seconds. Please rethink your law Thank you.
I'm an adult who enjoys art, doll customizing, and collecting figures/plushies from anime, cartoons, and disney. A lot of adults who enjoy these kind of things have to put up with so much stigma despite not hurting anyone.
I couldn't agree more. I Jackie's site and ones like it because we can all chat learn new things and talk to like minded people. I craft, collect and watch anima, I paint much more. I also enjoy teaching my self a new skill or hobby.
This sucks so much! So many of my favourite creators are "child-appealing" and I don't want them to not be rewarded for their absolutely amazing efforts! This isn't fair at all!
If only there was a clearly defined rule in the terms and conditions on the appropriate age to use UA-cam. If only there was a UA-cam like app SPECIFICALLY FOR CHILDREN. *I'm being sarcastic kiddos*
I've got a great question. Feminists are all over people's asses over anything remotely "offensive" towards women nowadays. Wouldn't this be a great thing for them to complain about? Maybe they could rant the FTCs ears off and get em to drop the law cause it sounds "sexist" against women 😂 I'm not a feminist at all and most of the things todays feminists moan about is ridiculous. Buuuttt just maybe them complaining this one time could actually do something good 😅 just a crazy idea don't take it too seriously 😋
Nicola Heyns That’s actually a pretty good point someone could use whilst sending an email to the FTC to help try to stop this nonsense. I salute you gamer
@@soniaramos7119 Thank you o7 (salute we use in World of Tanks) I absolutely love games and art channels. It'd be a real shame if these people use such vague categories for channels. People make a living off of youtube, they're employing themselves amd becoming hard working entrepreneurs. Such a silly law would put a lot of people out of work and would mean more tax dollars in welfare if they can't find any other job ☹️
This is what I commented "In this case, you are Cencoreshipping creators who make works of art from dolls, or help parents make informed decisions when buying either a toy or a potentially dangerous kit. And turning off comments WILL isolate 13+ teens who don't have social media or aren't allowed to have social media from the rest of the community, and in turn, impair the content creator from receiving feedback and requests from a large part of their audience. By forcing this law, you are also pushing those who do art AND get their money from youtube to forward their careers. If you are so worried about the kids, forward your attention to the UA-camKids App, and push to improve that app for kids under the age of 13, instead of attacking the creators on the site meant for older audiences." #nerdification
This is very good cause I'm over 13 but still with my parents and UA-cam is the only thing I'm allowed to have(under strict circumstances) so even if creators start finding ways not to get demonetized by cursing a bit, still will hurt them cause people like my parents won't allow us to watch it cause it has cursing, I know I can't be the only one with this problem
honestly what's to stop them from taking this concept to other social media platforms? honestly it might not be long before people are doing the same thing to our precious memes!!!!
UA-cam was the only and is the only thing I watch and now I have a to go somewhere else because of this, there will be barely any thing to watch, and it’s extremely difficult for UA-cam full timers to make any money! Moriah is an awesome channel like you, and she’s a full time UA-camr this is terrible and I wish everyone luck through this weird and difficult time
Here's a novel idea: How about parents taking some responsiDAMNbility and policing their own kids and leave the government and social media platforms out of it. Asinine.
newer gona hapen, perents dunt wanto and dunt know how to be perents anymore. and if you try to be a perent then you rice the risk of the goverments taking your child away cous your being a bad perent. so this is just gona hapen more and more and more
@@kokopuppy57342 Well... that's not true. I can assure there are many parents out there that use UA-cam kids, otherwise it wouldn't exist. My kids watch UA-cam Kids. And as their mother I will sometimes let them watch UA-cam.com under my supervision. Because there is content here that there isn't on youtube kids and that is MUCH better and more intelligent that some of the crap they have in youtube kids. Putting all parents in the same box of "bad irresponsible people" is unreal and unfair. Is like saying all pitbulls are aggressive and violent dogs.
The thing is, even if content is “ child-appealing”, that doesn’t mean that it can’t appeal to adults as well. Stepping away from UA-cam for a bit, shows like Gravity Falls, Steven Universe, Miraculous, and My Little Pony all possess adult audiences despite being “child appealing” content.
Yeah Steven universe and all shows have adult peal like sexuality and abuse while always having a appeal to kids why can’t UA-cam and FTC have a agreement
No one is saying that adults can’t find child appealing content or products appealing. The fact that cartoons made for kids have adults jokes thrown in proves this. All they are saying is that children need to be protected from content that is made for adults but interesting to kids. A lot of UA-cam content creators don’t know how to mask adult jokes or content into their child appealing videos, or don’t realize that although they aren’t marketing to kids they are making content that children want to watch. UA-cam is just trying to make sure that kids aren’t being taken advantage of or stumbling upon content not made for them.
This is unfair How about the parents take care of the children and not give them a phone because they are to young huuuuh Edit: thx for the likes and I understand its not always the parents fault but they still shouldn't blame the youtubers
I totally agree. If it's as big of an issue as the FTC says it is, which I dont think it is, it should be on the parents to change. Any government entity should be excluded on this issue.
@Just_AutumnYT Since everything nowadays is dangerous,i think they SHOULD have a phone,but NOT a SMARTPHONE.Maybe a 2000's phone on which its possible to make calls and text their parents?
I grew up on youtube. I learned from UA-cam. I'm still learning from it like, I'm Polish but I'm not as good as I used to be at it so I'm rewatching the Polish UA-cam Content Creators that I used to watch and I'm getting better from it. If this actually happens my heart will be broken.
I just opened UA-cam Studio and have the message “ all creators are obligated to take action and comply. review your channel and video settings” 😞 The thought of being fined for accidentally labeling a video wrong is terrifying. My channel is very small but I still don’t want to label my videos as children’s videos. I don’t know what to do about polymer clay videos that they might think are for children. For instance my polymer clay ET. Could definitely look like it’s for children on my channel. I don’t understand why there is not a button that you just click when you open the UA-cam app agreeing that you’re an adult ! Let’s be real children are still going to be watching videos on UA-cam... now they’ll just be watching all the things that parents really don’t want them to. So so salty! 🧂 😡
I feel you, i also have a very small channel, i do graphic designs, they could easily say that the content i make is for children. I even have heard something about terminating channels that dont make them enough money....
I'm a microscopic channel that, currently, makes animations and progress videos of artwork for fictional characters. Based on their vague outlines, I could very well fall under "child directed". But I am not a content creator for children, I never will be and some of my artwork probably shouldn't even be viewed by children.
what world is this! god damn it! so basically salt is DEMONETIZED! adults such as Nerdy crafter, or Moriah Elizabeth are just trying to tell parents that some kits go IN DA TRASH and to not buy them. I really don't understand why it should be demonetized DUH
UA-cam: we are going to get rid of all kids stuff FTC: *ima bout to end this man's career* (Son peeps too me to change it but it also makes sense so yeet)
UA-cam: ALLLLLRIGHTY CHILD-APPEAL THIS AND THAT AND THERE WE GO NOW ANYTHING ARTSY IS ONLY FOR CHILDREN EVEN THOUGH WE KNOW ITS FOR ADULTS TOO!!! art and craft youtubers: ima 'bout to end this mans whole career
They can say that everything's "child-appealing": Animals: kiDs LiKE AniMalS Food: kIds Eat FoOd Even houses: KidS wIlL wAnT tO haVe this HoUuSE🤦♀️😤😤😤 I hate COPPA. It's not our fault if we're creative and we make drawings/ sculptures
Hey, I got a bright pink one that's called a "Unicorn Horn"... It's even sparkly. I'm pretty sure the Algorithm would call that child friendly content...I think this is just a bit too loosely worded to be Constitutional even.
It IS actually UA-cam doing this because the FTC provides for a “general audience” option that would alleviate this whole shemozzle but UA-cam won’t allow it because they can’t make as much money off ads. Put the blame where it belongs which is squarely on UA-cam!
They should punish the people like Guava Juice and Logan Paul, they are exploring kids. Not amazing people like you!! (Wow that’s a lotta likes thanks guys)
Usually, I hate grammer nazis , but what you mean is they are *exploiting* kids. If they were *exploring* kids, then they'd be pedophiles too. 😂 Couldn't agree more though.
Save Marine Life have you watched the video? If you make family friendly content you get demonized or even fined. You. Can’t. Make. Family. Friendly. Content. Even though that’s what UA-cam has been pushing forever
Thank you for doing this video. I am sharing with my friends and followers and have commented on the FTC page. Thank you for mentioning to be clear and concise, SUPER important for getting our message across. I recently my crafting channel and have just TODAY learned of what is about to go down. You are correct, together we can help the FTC fix the issue. We could simply need a "GENERAL" option instead of cut and dry (according to Ian - Social Media Lawyer) child directed or not. Thanks for making this video! Jo McEwen
Why are all these parents such Karens? There’s a KIDS app, MADE FOR THEIR KIDS, yet they’re complaining and the FTC is forcing creators to comply with THEIR rules all because some Karens want to let their kids to watch the regular UA-cam, where there is ADULT CONTENT. That’s like taking your kids into a bar, complaining that there’s alcohol, then calling the cops. edit: typos
I just had my daughter in September and have started watching nursery videos from my account since I pay for UA-cam red so I don’t have to worry about ads on the videos. I’ll be insanely pissed if my account starts to be limited because I decided to let my daughter watch and listen to children’s videos. I don’t make content anymore but might plan to in the future so if my account is deemed a child it could affect my future videos. This whole situation is bullshit.
Please watch the video ALL the Way! The issue isn't with UA-cam. UA-cam is following a LAW. We need to change the LAW as it is. Please check these links after the video:
Sign our Petition: chng.it/kLnwsSJzFv
Write a comment to the FTC: bit.ly/31XAEXJ
Suggested Talking Points for Viewers: bit.ly/2Wptf1U
Suggested Talking Points for Creators: bit.ly/31SwLmI
No.WAY. I am so angry and I hope the law will change. Be sure we have your back 😖❤❤❤
I won't let that happened
NerdE, we have a problem. I tried to post my comment on the FTC, but every time, it kept saying, "Please correct all errors to continue" and it said I left the comments section blank even though I typed it. Is anyone else having this problem?
@@kitirena2083 Refresh the page and try again, or shut down the phone/computer and try again.
Edit: spelling
NerdECrafter I will watch video and then sign the petition EVERYONE PLEAEE SIGN IT AND HELP WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE! LETS WORK TOGETHER
Honestly, it’s the parents Job to monitor what THEIR child watches instead of using UA-cam as a babysitter. UA-cam is killing itself. 3/4 of the channels I watch are arts and crafts channels, and the fact that UA-cam finds art childish is SAD.
We are all behind you. Keep fighting! in the end, all I know is that the FTC is about to get A LOT of angry yet educational emails.
LETS GOOOOOOOOOOO
You got that right, let fight back
I agree and high we fight back
Omg Im not the only one who said its the parents! You go girl/boy!
In this case, it’s not really UA-cam’s fault, they are trying to cover their own butt, they can’t exactly snub the FTC and keep going on the same way.
I agree completely that it should be on the parents to control what their kids watch. It’s rubbish that UA-cam got fined for this. Like, they can’t control when a parent just hands their device to their kid, why is it their fault now?!
Sounds like more people making decisions over things they dont understand.
Josh Davis
Pretty much, because if they did they’d know the TOS states that those under 13 shouldn’t be using UA-cam and that UA-cam kids exists.
True true
More that they don't understand how wide reaching the consequences will be. I prefer watching UA-cam over TV these days, and gaming/crafting/toy review channels are the main things I watch. So, I'm not happy about this, and sometimes I feel like I'm just waiting for UA-cam to shut down because everyone worth watching has been forced off.
Hey peeps tell every craft like youtubers like moriah elizabeth about this (moriah elizabeth and nerdecrafter should make a video together
this is off-topic, but the petition is almost to its goal!
Basically, now adults can’t like colors
Prepare for greyscale
woohoo mono tone ;u;
Yay! Now we dont get colors!!!
@@otterlystudios5180 Is... is your profile pic... *_PERIL?!?_*
Yep:(
Me: likes art, crafting, games and toy collecting.
UA-cam: yOu ArE a ChiLd!
*Evil UA-cam!*
Ur profile pick is legendary
UA-cam pls don’t judge a book by its cover it would be very nice 😒
cOpPaaaaaa
Ugh
True but do they also know that you're legally an adult at 18. Teenagers are still children
I am 20 and I like "childish" stuff why do people think its only for kids
Ikr! Im 13 i love watching these ary youtubers. Tho most teens might think.its "too got damn childish"
Exactly!!!!!!
Ikr I like my little pony And I'm 11
ronda jones same XD
@@sami_5065 No, 13 is still a child
Huh. Who wants to bet Twitch’s content EXPLODES in January, after the entire arts & crafts community are driven off of UA-cam?
Also: as a parent, it is MY RESPONSIBILITY to be mindful of the media (including adverts) that my child consumes. It is NOT UA-cam’s (or anyone else’s) responsibility, rightly or wrongly, to decide what is appropriate for my child to view. As in all things, I’m responsible to make sure that I’m vetting what my child does, or I don’t deserve to be a parent.
This has made me want to do Twitch more now and my viewers if they like the content can decide to support me by sending bits and subs my way which is better then getting zip for being an under dog here on UA-cam with only 300 subs.
Well stated. *applauds*
You're so right but the majority of kids are raised on screens with the parent off doing what they want
Twitch has some crazy problems too. It's not a solution.
Don't move to twitch, it's sexist - move to dailymotion!
I'm so angry that they think that art and drawing is automatically child directed. I draw for a living and love my job and commissioners and personally I feel offended by this
not to mention a lot of traditional artists use alcohol based pens, which cannot be sold to kids but I'm sure that would be overlooked.
My art style looks kid friendly but the character stories contain violence, so certainly not for kids.
Since when is art childish anyway? Since when?
Im glad more people feel this way, this actually strongly discouraged me from posting my art speed pints i make when i draw. I was going to, but seeing this i dont want to anymore.
Then go tell the FTC, commentary here helps no one
Lovely Art Angels Go for it, but don't click the for kids button and don't draw kids art such as animation.
Hi Jacki, it was nice meeting you at vidsummit this year. Thank you for making this video. This is really scary stuff for all of us creators. I will make a video as well about it on my channel to bring awareness.
Hi! Yes! Please make a video! The more awareness, the better
So basically because there are parents who can’t monitor their own children now UA-cam has to pay for it & ultimately the creators and we the audience also have to suffer
Exactly!
Oof
Exactly.
Tina Bahena correct
Tina Bahena yea that’s explained so well
Let’s be honest
Kids watch everything
Gachaverse Trash
chng.it/DHLy2Z7b7c
Sign to stop this!
so true
Gachaverse Trash I know right
Yes so like how can they stop it if they watch everything ? It’s like wanting to stop UA-cam !
Exactly
"Children's content" gets demonitized
"Adult content" get demonized.
Get prepared for the only video on UA-cam to be paint drying
Emma Erasmus paint?!? That’s child appealing that can’t happen
also, it cant be a bright shiny color or it may get labeled as child appealing, so it will have to be black, white, or some variation between the 2.
Not even. Kids might like that.
You can watch grass growing that's all
@@koryspacial5099 nononononononononono! GRASS IS GREEN! CHILDREN LIKE THE COLOR GREEN! -_-
"Child appealing content"....dude, everything is appealing to kids! When I was young I watched the walking dead and my little pony back to back! Kids like everything these days! Dang Coppa...
Bro,when I was young I used to watch pinkie pie form mlp make cupcakes out of rainbow dash
Ya my dad was watching the walking dead when I hade a night mare and I saw him on the couch but didn’t know what the tv show was so I started watching and then I got soo scared I still rember till this day
And I was soo young
How about if parents step up and “parent” and take responsibility for their own children rather than let the government punish the rest of us because they are incapable of doing so.
Exactly right! It should only be on the parents to regulate what their kids watch.
Sadly lots of parents nowadays give their kids tablets or their phones too keep them quiet, my aunt does that with her daughter. I’m the one that monitors what my cousin watches because her mom couldn’t care less as long a she’s quiet and staying still. They think of tablets and phone as some sort of “babysitter”
As a parent, I whole heartily agree. My son isn't even two yet, but I make sure he watches good quality content. He loves watching cartoons, musicals. He does not watch anything dealing with fighting, gore, excessive violence, swearing etc... His dad lets him watch police chases, he loves the sounds of sirens and his reactions are adorable.
It is like "MAKE A CHILD ACCOUNT!"
@@pinkusdean1178 exactly! The FTC is throwing their weight around and twisting what COPPA is actually for. COPPA is in place to help protect children under the age of 13 from getting their personal information taken and the FTC is waaaayy over stepping it.
This basically means that almost all videos that me (Age 28) watch is targeted to children and I might lose my favorite creators.
Like: you
: moriah Elizabeth
: dollightful
: simply nailogical... and many more
@Ayumu Gacha Studios
But if only bots are picking content like toy rewind or nail tutorial is it not possible that she is going to be hurt by system. Like nail painting is technically kids friendly... I don't believe she is going to be hurt but there is possibility. What I are most worried is dollightful because it's dolls she is handling even its not intent for kids. But it's not like I have really yet looked hard into this thing so all I can say is that I think so
Im in the same place... Most of what i watch is considered kid friendly crafting... Ive already noticed and read some in private groups, this kind of act and enforcment of it will be horrible to the autistic community bc many have what can be considered very childish hobbies and interests. Those changes wont be good for people who thrive off routines.
sinii.: I know... I really want Jackie and Moriah to stay 😢
Omg not Moria
Moriah
Wait- So if your video is "family friendly" it will be tagged as child friendly, but if you make a video that isn't "family friendly" you get demonitized? So how is anyone supposed to make a living on UA-cam anymore??
Don't know. UA-cam has gone to shreds. It sucks anymore.
You can't. That's why many have decided to get a proper job. (Not saying UA-cam isnt a job)
Ellie M. This reminded me of a friend of mine who wanted to be a UA-camr when she grew up... Now look at UA-cam... It sucks...
@@scarxnnivs most of the people who arent youtubers are grateful their parents told them no.
@@k.h.691 wait.... MARKIPLIER!?!? THEY ARE SUCH A BIG UA-camR THO!!! OMG THEY AREN'T EVEN FAMILY FRIENDLY this is NOT GOOD
Bruh a LOT of kids watch horror movies and other “adult content” and a LOT of adults watch cartoons and other “kid content”
So what. The law in question doesn't care what people like to watch, it is about websites not being allowed to track children.
Look at Marvel for example, they're almost all rated PG-13, but who listens to that?
Eexactly. When I was 6 I was watching The Exorcist and playing Silent Hill.
Gacha Lover 13 cause all kids want to be powerful adults, and all adults want to be careless children
Exactly
NO NO WAY AM I LETTING YOU GO I CANT LIVE WITHOUT YOU JACKI NOOOOOOO
I NEED YOU TO BE HERE FOR MEEEE
NO I WONT LET THEM WIN YOU DONT DESERVE TO GO
Same
Maanasi Halemane what the frick? You don’t care about Nerde and all you care about is Moriah Elizabeth? You cold at least say “Guys we need to help Moriah. Her channel needs the comments and freedom”. Nerdecrafter is a good friend of Moriah and I think she would be horrified if Nerde was put in the kids category
I can't imagine if Moria is gone 😔😔😔😔
Maanasi Halemane there are other people you know 😑
Near, far wherever you are!!!!!
Law: Oh you have a cheap yellow pencil that is going to be used for professional art? Meh, a child could do that
*DEMONITIZED*
Guinea Pig Productions 🙌🏻
Demonitized. Hell more like demonized.
Squee! It got hearted!!
@@higherground711 haha😂
This stuff isn’t just for kids, it’s for everyone
U dont understand do u?
Exactly.
Yup
They do know that there is kids UA-cam so cant they do that? And leave this UA-cam alone?
my mom loves stuff like this. NOT CHILDISH
UA-cam: All art are considered for children
Hentai: *Laughs in Evil*
LMAOOO
WELP LETS MAKE YOUNG WE LADS WATCH HENTAI THEN WTF IS WRONG WITH COPPA
@@kennedyskastleofficial8211 WTF THE KIDS DUUUDE THE KIDSSS
True
lmao
Isn’t this the whole reason why they have UA-cam kids
Edit: Thanks for all the likes lmao
Yeah, but atleast we say it's not kid friendly if we aren't! And trust me, kids is WAY WEIRDER
Bunnygirl1a studios! the sequel it really is...
But Like...UA-cam Kids Doesn’t Have As Many Videos I Watch On A Daily Basis Sometimes They Don’t Have Family Friendly Channels I Watch On There! So I Would Prefer Regular UA-cam Rather Than UA-cam Kids
UA-cam kids sucks
Uhm... OMG YOU ARE CORRECT LIKE JUST KIDS GO OVER THERE LIKE NANI!?!?!??!??!?
UA-cam demonetizes adult content and “children’s” content. I think it’s time for a new platform. I mean I know this isn’t just UA-cam, it’s a law but still. It’s getting out of control.
What if the kids also move there?
@@sugaryippee im going to search on how to make a social media website
It’s not even UA-cam. They don’t have a choice. It’s the FTC.
This really upsets me because parents don’t pay enough attention to what their kids are doing on the internet and now we’re all paying the price
I am with you siesta
Amen
PREACH
Kittybug 247 that’s not what this is. This is damage control for money they lost themselves. They targeted ads to kids, and that’s why they got fined. Not because parents let their kids watch what they want.
This is about targeted ads towards children. Children who's data is collected and then they are served ads which they aren't developed enough to understand are ads. It's not about parents not parenting and children watching content that's too mature for their age.
If parents don't like what their kids see, then they need to learn to step in and *PARENT* for once in their lives.
Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.
And why youtube have app for kids for if they going set this new rules
Yesss
*applause* The most beautiful Ted Talk of the decade
this comment is very true and very funny
We MUST fight this!!!
I have submitted my letter and voiced my concerns. I have wanted to become a content creator for a while now. I teach history and I want to create a history channel that is not only educational but also I would love to include projects that anyone can do to help reinforce the lesson or are time period appropriate. The new possible regulations has paused this endeavor. It is my hope that the FTC will listen to our collective voices. I love you Jackie. You are a inspiration. You are entertaining. You help me as a single mom with a limited income make better buying choices. You are not alone. We will fight this battle with you.
That doesn't make any sense, Rick and Morty are also cartoon characters but is it for children? No.
True
Pancake TV Yeah, SouthPark and Sausage Party too!
Facts
Pancake TV exactly
Happy Tree Friends too....
As a crafting creator, parent to two young children, and a viewer... I left a BIG OL’ comment. The point you and Jeremy made about parental consent was an aspect I hadn’t thought of and as a parent, it got me even more riled up. If I give my consent for my kids to use my UA-cam account, that is my choice. And I frequently watch crafting videos WITH my kids. Some of these rules feel like if I took my kids to the park and I told them it was okay for them to go climb the plastic rockwall and a stranger came over and took them off the rockwall because it’s too dangerous. Excuse me, I am their parent and their parenting is MY responsibility, not yours. Mind ya bidness.
Thanks for sharing this topic and some ways we can help!
~Raven
Too bad I can only like this comment once! So true!!!
My kids are the REASON I found Jackie in the first place. My youngest saw a thumbnail on my phone with Angel and screamed with delight. We've binged everything Jackie has made, and I don't know how often we've seen the videos featuring Angel. Through all that content, I've never once felt like my kids were being targeted. This whole situation is ridiculous, and you bet I sent a BIG 'OL comment as well. You keep doin' you Raven.
I completely agree with you. The reason this is even a thing is because of parents that don't want to have the responsibility of researching what their kids are watching. That's why they need a very ineffective algorithm to tell them what's appropriate or not.
But the new regulations aren't stopping you from watching UA-cam with your kids. They are just regulating the targeted advertising. Television does the same thing.
In your park analogy it would be like if you took your kid to the park and before they could play they had to be subjected to several demonstrations of toys and food they're going to be likely to want. What if the only demonstrations were extremely violent toys and junk food? How would you feel about your kid playing at the park then?
It's not the content that's being restricted it's the advertising.
(The negative effects upon the channels obviously suck, but it's important kids are protected)
@@sarahwarmington3172 Yeah, of course, but I suppose my point is that it's my responsibility as a parent to step in if those kinds of things are being shown to my kids. I don't want some third party deciding what is and isn't okay for my kids, that's what I should be doing. I agree that kids need to be protected but that's first and foremost, my job as a parent and not someone else's. Not every parent has the same standards for what their kids need to be protected from.
Hey everyone! I watched a lot of videos about this, spreading my homework with you all.
Essentially, the response by UA-cam was NOT required of them by the law. The COPPA law actually recommended an Age Gate to sequester children away without affecting the rest of the channels. Also, there is a line (16 C.F.R Section 312.2 if you care) within the law that protects general audience channels from litigation. UA-cam chose not to do the Age Gate, and UA-cam chose to to the For/Not For kids click button without any middle ground, and install an automated flagging system. This is NOT an FTC and COPPA problem. This is a UA-cam problem. COPPA is however trying to fight for the idea that Channel Owners are operators of their own site, and not you tube. THIS is the point that needs to be fought with the FTC.
Sources from Lawyer Channels
Ian Corzine: "COPPA INSIDER Update!!! What MORE UA-cam Is HIDING
"
Hoeg Law: "COPPA Complications: UA-cam Responds (also - No, they don’t have to train you) (VL138)
"
and "How the FTC’s Latest Guidance on COPPA Fails UA-cam Content Creators (but not the FTC) (VL139)"
Not a Lawyer
Folding Ideas: "What's Gone Wrong With the FTC's COPPA Agreement With UA-cam
"
It's like they're going over to a random school and saying "No riding bicycles!" Even though the school isn't their property and they don't even know what bikes are.
Lol my school does that
2019: *save the turtles*
2020: *save the crafters*
Yes
Both are more important than money (?)
Love this 😅
Pink Drowned Fish it’s a joke ok?
Debbie Wilson thank you if you like it 😀
Adults: Oooh!! Pink is a pretty color.
The law: NO YOU CAN'T LIKE ANY COLORS
Everyone: You boomers
YES.
@@gisselramoscalderon8932 YEEEES
YOU CAN
Yeees but boomers are sooooo 2019
@@chantellerutherford1475 Boomer's are so 2020
Why can’t parents just take responsibility and not let their kids use their account? That would fix all this
I know it would be GREAT.
What about including me kid youtubers
Because that would mean they will have to take responsibility for there own damn goblin they created.
Won't this make youtube go out of business
@@xxpandagalaxyxx5655 Goblin? I mean you were a kid once two just saying
"What? Blame the parents? What does that mean?"
Seriously, people never want to blame the parents, even if they're clearly at fault.
Also, some commenters under the petition said that they'd rather have their kids watch a targeted ad about toys than whatever the heck UA-cam could throw at them randomly. Not all ads are designed for children, they can get scared of the smallest things, like a creepy face.
The Fox I know right!
Someone needs to show them Nerd City's Jake Paul video to see why targeted ads aimed at children are illegal.
..i have a good question,why even let kids on internet?? they are too young for it. we didnt have youtube when we were kids, we played outside or outside with toys.
I agree more than 1/2 the issues that have to do with children it's almost always the parents not parenting theyer children, this is total BS!
I saw that comment too...I have my daughter watch UA-cam kids...maybe she should too. it’s all about parenting. Clearly she misunderstood
2019: save the internet
2020: Save The Creators #savethecrafter #savethecreators
Senpai Christmas
chng.it/DHLy2Z7b7c
Sign to stop this!
YES
#savethecreators
Person on UA-cam: hello i'm 22 and i like to watch people who sculpt dragons
UA-cam: *scoff* kid
Can parents just parent their children and leave creators alone?
I would think both parents and teachers
Parents love giving a phone or tablet to their child instead of paying attention to them because they'd rather keep them quiet than spending time with them.
@@BlackPearl27 YES omgf
Even if they did kids are wanna know it so nothing well change even Bette it's well be the same
BlackPearl
-.-‘ I sit with my kids and watch un godly amounts of child shows with them to make sure they are age appropriate. I don’t let them watch UA-cam by themselves. :/ please don’t put us all in one group.
So let me get this straight... UA-cam is paying a fine because parents can’t control what their child chooses to watch? ; - ; tHaT mAkEs SeNsE
Ikr
When there's literally UA-cam KIDS! Like, COME ON!
I don't know why nerde and other craft and kid like channels aren't something parents don't want their kids watching vs jack Paul are we sure it was Evan adults that complain or adults like creators wanting kids off of UA-cam so their content can make money
No. Google is paying a fine because they broke the law. No different than you or I getting caught for speeding, Google and it's data mining has been intrusive enough that it's implemented data from children under the protected age of 13, for advertising targets. There are no laws specifying the age, race, species of mammal or otherwise, that prevent children under 13 from viewing videos on UA-cam. However the collection of data on ANYONE is Google's responsibility alone as there's no physical hand off from the user to Google, who in essence steals it. Despite the innocents of declaring what data is obtained, buried under several pages of finely printed links, that's no excuse for violating consumer protections.
@@thisguy3500 but they are mining the data based on the videos the children are watching, using their parent's account, correct? How would Google know what age the children are before they collect the data?
There is already UA-cam Kids!
Why do you need to ruin UA-cam for everyone else!
idk
EXACTLY!
Angelus on UA-cam kids,it’s like a baby UA-cam,you can’t comment,no ads,and etc. it’s very boring
@@nasirgoldbourne47 WHAT YOU CANT COMMENT?! thats so BOOOOOOOORING
@@nasirgoldbourne47 youtube is to watch videos you dont need to comment and no ads is a good thing? Wth
so basically “hey everyone let’s go back to the 1930s when we only had black and white tv”
Lol
This deserves way more likes lol
“UA-cam infinity war”
I’m sorry I had to-
Potato OωO I’m not going to lie, but it’s going to take MORE than 50%
WerewolfGaming50 yeah I know, but I still had to 😂
Potato OωO I really can’t blame you xD
I don’t feel so good
*_UA-cam Endgame_*
So basically they’re trying to kill half the platform.
Pretty much.
Which is absolutely ludicrous due to the fact that not all of the Art&Crafts is for kids.
It's a very broad community and can be for everyone.
YES
Probably more than half honestly.
YUP!
Yup
Parents should be responsible for what their children watch not the creaters
Ikr
exactly
YES. EXACTLY. IF A CHILD CLICKS "IM 18 OR OVER" ON A PORN SITE, THEN IT IS NOT THE PORN SITES FAULT. IT IS THE FAULT OF THE PARENT. (just an example dont kill me.)
You look 9 girl i am sure you watched something you shouldn't have.
mushoom mushoom they do have a point though no matter what their age is.
There is absolutely nothing that isn't "appealing " to children, they are nosy little buggers and want to know everything they may get 2 minutes into a video and decide its not what they want but they also may not. It is the place of parents to know what their child is doing and what you tubes they are watching. It is the place of parents to not let kids watch things on their accounts.
Donna Monticello Exactly, they are little adults in training.
Donna Monticello I’m a kid and I’m not a nosy little bugger!
Remember me between the age of 10 -12, risking my very life to sneak into my parent's bedroom and going through my dad's drawers until I struck pay dirt with a copy of Playboy's 1971 issue, I can only imagine as a millennial, the lengths that I would go through to seek out and explore my targeted content on the internet ...... "Yes, I am 18" not to mention some of the content here on this very site ....... I'd be spending equal time with the data being collected for me that I would be deleting all emails asking me if I'm lonely tonight before my parents found out so that I could live to see 13.
excuse meh
UA-cam: you can’t curse or we’ll pay you less
The law: no cursing? Bright colors? Ah yes! For children! No pay!
Doesn't even matter if you curse. Still made for kids if there are bright colours!
The ultimate catch 22!
Bye bye lofi and pastel meme animation
I don’t understand how they can sum up all of these “child-like” things- it’s so broad when they say colorful videos are child directed. Not only that, but art has so many forms that it can’t be defined as one “genre”. This whole thing infuriated me and I hope that the problem will be solved❤️
It's 💯 the parents responsibility to monitor what their children watch.
Kee Kee I completely agree with this because most of the channels I watch are arts and crafts like Jackie, etc. . I mean what was the point of UA-cam Kids If parents are letting children use regular UA-cam as a pose to UA-cam Kids.
This. Ok I'm a parent of THREE kids. I make damn sure they dont watch inappropriate content. Sure every so often they'll click in something bad but that's on me to intervene and tell them no.
You hire Micheal to babysit your kids and come home wondering why theyre all d**d.
@@proxyhacker89 exactly! That's why we do appropriate movies when at home and in the car she can watch UA-cam but I'm always listening & paying attention to what's on !
@@zirconiaprime4767 as a parent I believe parents are held responsible when it comes to things like this. If it's a reoccurring problem with your kids maybe revoke UA-cam from your child. It's simple!
This. UA-cam/other websites should not be holding these parents hands on regulating stuff like this. If they let their kid use their account, then everything falls back on the parents for not watching them.
This just makes me sick! I used to use UA-cam as like therapy and as a creative outlet. Now I feel like I should just delete everything because I am terrified of being fined:(
This is the dumbest rules ive heard in the world like seriously
I KNOW!
#SaveCrafters!
For real tho
Tell me about it 😑
stary falls so true, UA-cam is probably just trying to make UA-cam kids more popular
stary falls I agree with you about that
*makes adult content*
*UA-cam*: demonized
*Makes child content*
*UA-cam*: demonized
*Me*: WHAT THE HELL DO YOU WANT FROM US
be mainstream or big brand related or get lost is the message
Way to sum it up
@@uberkirbeeh7954 yea
Me: makes teenager content.
UA-cam:DEMONIZED.
Yes, this is only getting worse
Ah yes, once again, "Let's make decisions about things we know nothing about!"
So art, basically, is now considered child-directed? Well, screw all the adult-oriented artists. Also characters being "child-directed" is just weird. It's super vague, as characters can have many different portrayals.
As I'm big into Transformers, I'll use it as my example. While they are usually toys for kids, some of the comic-based content is really skirting the lines to stay child friendly. They can be extremely violent, to the point I would not want a young child reading them. But I do love the characters and have/will make fanart of them.
I'll definitely leave a comment. These rules are ridiculous.
If animation is “Child Directed” there are so many inappropriate animations on UA-cam if the machine is like “Oh it has animation in it, it must be for children” This is seriously going to be a problem if animation is going to be “Child Directed”
*Boi* really FTC????
Says curse word: demonetize
Makes family friendly stuff:demonetize
Makes education related video:demonized
Idk if that last one is a typo or not but either way it's TRUE and I love it.
@@LizzyMarieTina this is not UA-cam. UA-cam is following a law. She spent an entire video explaining that
ITS NOT UA-cam
Oh guys sowwy ;-; I posted before finishing the video you can see the time I posted I was one of the first persons to comment so sowwy QmQ
Nick Animations it’s ok but maybe remove your comment
Here’s my argument:
UA-cam is supposed to be a place where we can express ourselves and have a say but what now... you’re getting rid of most things people have access to. So what if it’s a craft kit. Your evaluating everything telling us to NOT waste money or how this is good education!
And if we get rid of everything that is child directed witch will be demonized and if your getting rid of everything that isn’t appropriate for adults and it is demonized what are we supposed to post? Science facts well if there’s bright colors its child directed so even though this was not intended to do this and have SO many comments demanding other wise just think.
You are sooo smart I agree 100%💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
Also, what constitutes a “child?” I’m 15. Would I be considered a child because I’m underaged? Or would I be considered an adult because I as an individual have the mental capacity and maturity of most adults? I am not a creator, but I know from other videos that viewers will be effected by these changes too. Because I watch Nerdecrafter, Dollightful, Moriah Elizabeth, etc, will I not be able to watch “adult” content that I love as well? I’m in that middle category where I’m treated as an adult, but I am not yet legally one. How am I supposed to be happy using this platform if it is unclear how I will be designated? How am I supposed to be happy if I have to choose between “child appealing” and “adult” content?
I'm turning 17 in a month and practically a year away from being considered an adult.
Us teenagers are getting to where we are coming from childhood to adulthood and are stuck in between.
Be still aren't considered adults but a lot of us end up having the mind capacity and maturity as one.
I know since I was too at an early age of my early teens and still being such.
People though I was a couple years older than I was because of my maturity.
Now I like the fact that we might get better adult content on UA-cam but the fact that they are doing this to the Arts & Crafts community isn't right.
Seeing that it can be for everyone,not all of it is going to be considered kid friendly.
It's a very broad community and it needs to be seen as such.
I too love those creators as well as Jackie.
Besides how can Jackie and some of those creators be considered for children only when they sometimes sneak in those dirty jokes that most kids probably won't get and shouldn't get.
There's should be content for everyone,but you have to find a way to make it work.
Generally it's age 13 and under.
I was also thinking this... Seeing as I am also 15 and it's weird... I feel as though I am a mature adult-ish type person, I feel as though I have a child-ish side as well. I know I am of a mind to understand that what I am watching is NOT for children but it isn't exactly something... I can't watch. I feel as though this is an issue we need to think hard and long on!!!
I’m also 15
@@mixitup6805 You are breaking the ToS of UA-cam.
"In any case, you affirm that you are over the age of 13, as the Service is not intended for children under 13. If you are under 13 years of age, then please do not use the Service."
You are part of the problem.
UA-cam: characters are child friendly anime, cartoons, anything. therefore demonetized.
Me: *draws hentai*
I say people flood youtube and ftc mailboxes with this content with the question "this is cartoon is it kid friendly?" Or those super violent anime shows...
This whole thing is going to make youtube less family friendly overall because family friendly content creators will be less incentivised to CREATE content. UA-cam has been fighting creators tooth and nail to make their videos more family friendly, and now they're DEMONITIZING family friendly videos, so what is it youtube? Do you or do you not want family friendly content? Well guess you're gonna have to start swearing in your vids Jackie lol 😂
I watch a lot of commentary channels like Spill which are DEFFINITLY not child directed but the narrator uses a cartoon character as an avatar instead of a face cam. Does that now make Spill, a drama channel that discusses such things as harassment, sexual abuse, etc etc, a child directed channel because she uses an animated character???
This time it is not UA-cam's fault, it is the rule's fault :)
*Uses Pink in video”
UA-cam: Hippity Hoppity your video is now my property
Renee Tian Narpy’s fricked
ElectroLuxray _ Uh oh
So we gotta use black and white stuff 😐
I use black XD I'm fine
Imagine Melanie Martinez
Ya they didn’t think this properly did they
UA-cam: so you can not swear or do things that is not family friendly. Or else you get punisht.
UA-cam 2020/ftc : you can not be family friendly or else you get punisht
*punished*
Augusta Rose
😂
UA-cam isn’t doing that, the FTC (or so I think) is doing it-
yeah :,,v
pingki och starolit pij och glimor don’t spell wrong or you’ll get p u n i s h t
I just started my channel a little bit ago. I wanted to share with kids, my age , younger, and older, that it’s okay to be younger when your older and that in a world of craziness that being a nerd is okay. I love it and it busies my free time...but know I can’t do what I love!
Almost everything I watch on UA-cam is “child content”, I really don’t want to be removed from those communities.
I'm an adult and been one for awhiiile. Most of what I watch is child appealing.
Me too, but I’m not an adult yet, but the things I watch are like Moriah Elizabeth and UnspeakableGaming. (Just so you know, I’m not ten even though it might sound like it.)
Same I really hope we can stop this
What I commented:
Dear FTC,
I am a viewer and a small content creator here on UA-cam. Many of the UA-camrs make their money and everyday meal from making child content. But your law will stop them from making such content which will eventually break down their family. As a content creator, I know how hard it is to work everyday for millions of people and make videos. But due to your law, all of our hard work we put into the videos for sooo many years, will go into waste in just a matter of seconds. Please rethink your law
Thank you.
Thank you Jackie for the heart!
THIS IS WHAT I CALL ONE OF THE BEST PEOPLE ON THE EARTH
I feel almost feel like they are telling me that my hobbies are child like. I am a adult who enjoys crafting
I'm an adult who's an artist and loves to collect dolls.
Yeah
I'm an adult who enjoys art, doll customizing, and collecting figures/plushies from anime, cartoons, and disney.
A lot of adults who enjoy these kind of things have to put up with so much stigma despite not hurting anyone.
I couldn't agree more. I Jackie's site and ones like it because we can all chat learn new things and talk to like minded people. I craft, collect and watch anima, I paint much more. I also enjoy teaching my self a new skill or hobby.
No one:
UA-cam: hey so we got fined a lot of money so.....do whatever FTC says
FTC: NO ONE IS SAFE
Instead of putting pressure on UA-cam to protect the children, why don't we push for parents to protect their own children
Yeah,that would be too easy...
Exactly
That’s true though there is an app called UA-cam KIDS for a reason
absolutely agreed
i watched some 16-18+ ecchi anime with 12
that was on my mother not watching me , not the site or the person who uploaded them
Yes. Parents need to actually CARE about their children.
So basically, UA-cam is taking the “crafter” out of “nerdEcrafter”........... THAT IS MESSED UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They're taking the NerdE out too.
The FTC is.
Nora Dennis just the nerd she’ll just be E. 😢
This sucks so much! So many of my favourite creators are "child-appealing" and I don't want them to not be rewarded for their absolutely amazing efforts! This isn't fair at all!
This is no longer UA-cam. The you is gone thanks to FTC.
Welcome to Tube
Being forced not to be too edgy or kid friendly, stuck in a unexciting area
Sadness
Go to odyssey
If only there was a clearly defined rule in the terms and conditions on the appropriate age to use UA-cam.
If only there was a UA-cam like app SPECIFICALLY FOR CHILDREN.
*I'm being sarcastic kiddos*
R0CK3T F0X there is a UA-cam kids app
@@mollymccracken3401 Yep kiddo, my comment is being sarcastic.
Yt kids ( still have some weird crap going on though ) 😂
BUT THEY ALREADY MAKE UA-cam KIDS ITS YOOUUUTTUUBBEE KIIIDDDSSS DDUUUUDDDEEE WHYYYYY
There is 'UA-cam Kids.'
FTC: Girly topics are childish
Girly Topics: Yes, telling girls about their period is VERY childish
Agent 4 ; InkiiTydes *Angry towards pooberty*
Btw I like your user and pfp. I love Splatoon and Splatoon 2
I've got a great question. Feminists are all over people's asses over anything remotely "offensive" towards women nowadays. Wouldn't this be a great thing for them to complain about? Maybe they could rant the FTCs ears off and get em to drop the law cause it sounds "sexist" against women 😂 I'm not a feminist at all and most of the things todays feminists moan about is ridiculous. Buuuttt just maybe them complaining this one time could actually do something good 😅 just a crazy idea don't take it too seriously 😋
Nicola Heyns That’s actually a pretty good point someone could use whilst sending an email to the FTC to help try to stop this nonsense. I salute you gamer
@@soniaramos7119 Thank you o7 (salute we use in World of Tanks) I absolutely love games and art channels. It'd be a real shame if these people use such vague categories for channels. People make a living off of youtube, they're employing themselves amd becoming hard working entrepreneurs. Such a silly law would put a lot of people out of work and would mean more tax dollars in welfare if they can't find any other job ☹️
Yep
As a woman I feel offended by the declaration of female topics being "childish"!
I'll do best as I can to support you.
Yes same😡
Same😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
I'm offended too 😭🤌
It takes a village to raise a child. Apparently this village has no clue what they're doing.
This is what I commented
"In this case, you are Cencoreshipping creators who make works of art from dolls, or help parents make informed decisions when buying either a toy or a potentially dangerous kit.
And turning off comments WILL isolate 13+ teens who don't have social media or aren't allowed to have social media from the rest of the community, and in turn, impair the content creator from receiving feedback and requests from a large part of their audience.
By forcing this law, you are also pushing those who do art AND get their money from youtube to forward their careers.
If you are so worried about the kids, forward your attention to the UA-camKids App, and push to improve that app for kids under the age of 13, instead of attacking the creators on the site meant for older audiences."
#nerdification
They meed to actually care about it because
UA-cam kids....is weird but they do not do anything about it and shove all kids rules onto regular youtube
This is very good cause I'm over 13 but still with my parents and UA-cam is the only thing I'm allowed to have(under strict circumstances) so even if creators start finding ways not to get demonetized by cursing a bit, still will hurt them cause people like my parents won't allow us to watch it cause it has cursing, I know I can't be the only one with this problem
Censoring is the word you wanted op.
Has any Karen’s that are complaining about “inappropriate content” heard of an app called Kids UA-cam?
🙄 ikr
UA-cam kids has some not appropriate videos because they're also targeting kids and they are Elsa gate which isn't good
Karen’s need to be locked up and hopefully get some common sense
@Art CatGirl A LOT of inappropriate content actually...
Some children find access to UA-cam regardless. Some are attracted to UA-cam more. They will find a way to get to UA-cam.
The most confusing part is where do u draw the line? Are sponge bob memes going to be seen as for children? They are going to take away our memes?
Best. Idea. Ever. 😹💝
Rip Memes 2020
honestly what's to stop them from taking this concept to other social media platforms? honestly it might not be long before people are doing the same thing to our precious memes!!!!
@@justyourtypicalmlg9890 we need to organize a funeral 😫
@@annad8823 nobody will take away our memes!
UA-cam was the only and is the only thing I watch and now I have a to go somewhere else because of this, there will be barely any thing to watch, and it’s extremely difficult for UA-cam full timers to make any money! Moriah is an awesome channel like you, and she’s a full time UA-camr this is terrible and I wish everyone luck through this weird and difficult time
Here's a novel idea: How about parents taking some responsiDAMNbility and policing their own kids and leave the government and social media platforms out of it. Asinine.
newer gona hapen, perents dunt wanto and dunt know how to be perents anymore. and if you try to be a perent then you rice the risk of the goverments taking your child away cous your being a bad perent.
so this is just gona hapen more and more and more
@@kiri92azel Your grammar omfg honey it gave me a heart attack
There is literally a kids app yet parents can’t be bothered
@@kokopuppy57342 Well... that's not true. I can assure there are many parents out there that use UA-cam kids, otherwise it wouldn't exist. My kids watch UA-cam Kids. And as their mother I will sometimes let them watch UA-cam.com under my supervision. Because there is content here that there isn't on youtube kids and that is MUCH better and more intelligent that some of the crap they have in youtube kids. Putting all parents in the same box of "bad irresponsible people" is unreal and unfair. Is like saying all pitbulls are aggressive and violent dogs.
@@kiri92azel , that's a load of BS.
The thing is, even if content is “ child-appealing”, that doesn’t mean that it can’t appeal to adults as well. Stepping away from UA-cam for a bit, shows like Gravity Falls, Steven Universe, Miraculous, and My Little Pony all possess adult audiences despite being “child appealing” content.
Yeah Steven universe and all shows have adult peal like sexuality and abuse while always having a appeal to kids why can’t UA-cam and FTC have a agreement
No one is saying that adults can’t find child appealing content or products appealing. The fact that cartoons made for kids have adults jokes thrown in proves this. All they are saying is that children need to be protected from content that is made for adults but interesting to kids. A lot of UA-cam content creators don’t know how to mask adult jokes or content into their child appealing videos, or don’t realize that although they aren’t marketing to kids they are making content that children want to watch. UA-cam is just trying to make sure that kids aren’t being taken advantage of or stumbling upon content not made for them.
Yes, thank you!
Thank you.
This is unfair
How about the parents take care of the children and not give them a phone because they are to young huuuuh
Edit: thx for the likes and I understand its not always the parents fault but they still shouldn't blame the youtubers
I totally agree. If it's as big of an issue as the FTC says it is, which I dont think it is, it should be on the parents to change. Any government entity should be excluded on this issue.
Cats love true. That’s better than changing the whole ( sorry if I wrote the wrong one) platform.
Guess what? I AM A PARENT! And my kids watch this WITH ME!! OR, they watch what I've already watched, and approve of!!
@Just_AutumnYT Since everything nowadays is dangerous,i think they SHOULD have a phone,but NOT a SMARTPHONE.Maybe a 2000's phone on which its possible to make calls and text their parents?
But there's Tablets,laptops,Xbox,ps4 ect
I grew up on youtube. I learned from UA-cam. I'm still learning from it like, I'm Polish but I'm not as good as I used to be at it so I'm rewatching the Polish UA-cam Content Creators that I used to watch and I'm getting better from it. If this actually happens my heart will be broken.
This will affect everyone not just women but all family friendly content creators
Error chara yes, but most arts and crafts, Gacha, and family friendly is mostly GIRLS that’s why.
Jj Studioz ya
@@xoatlas Gacha is not kids context- I mean it is but it's inappropriate and toxic.
IKR
Jj Studioz it’s also gonna affect gaming and art
I just opened UA-cam Studio and have the message “ all creators are obligated to take action and comply. review your channel and video settings” 😞 The thought of being fined for accidentally labeling a video wrong is terrifying. My channel is very small but I still don’t want to label my videos as children’s videos. I don’t know what to do about polymer clay videos that they might think are for children. For instance my polymer clay ET. Could definitely look like it’s for children on my channel. I don’t understand why there is not a button that you just click when you open the UA-cam app agreeing that you’re an adult !
Let’s be real children are still going to be watching videos on UA-cam... now they’ll just be watching all the things that parents really don’t want them to.
So so salty! 🧂 😡
I feel you, i also have a very small channel, i do graphic designs, they could easily say that the content i make is for children. I even have heard something about terminating channels that dont make them enough money....
I'm a microscopic channel that, currently, makes animations and progress videos of artwork for fictional characters. Based on their vague outlines, I could very well fall under "child directed". But I am not a content creator for children, I never will be and some of my artwork probably shouldn't even be viewed by children.
I’m a fandom channel with 136 subs. I already don’t make money. The heck is wrong with them that they think this is okay???
I’m worried about my animations tbh, cuz they take forever and I’m not entirely sure what they’re gonna think of animations
I feel u
what world is this! god damn it! so basically salt is DEMONETIZED! adults such as Nerdy crafter, or Moriah Elizabeth are just trying to tell parents that some kits go IN DA TRASH and to not buy them. I really don't understand why it should be demonetized DUH
UA-cam: we are going to get rid of all kids stuff
FTC: *ima bout to end this man's career*
(Son peeps too me to change it but it also makes sense so yeet)
Lauren ;3 ha thats the right way to use this comment format.
well it's mostly the FTC doing it, so maybe edit it to be FTC? you don't have to though!
Replace Jackie with the FTC and then you got it right
@@wholikecake4245 ah yeah that made more sense then mine.
UA-cam: ALLLLLRIGHTY CHILD-APPEAL THIS AND THAT AND THERE WE GO NOW ANYTHING ARTSY IS ONLY FOR CHILDREN EVEN THOUGH WE KNOW ITS FOR ADULTS TOO!!!
art and craft youtubers: ima 'bout to end this mans whole career
They can say that everything's "child-appealing":
Animals: kiDs LiKE AniMalS
Food: kIds Eat FoOd
Even houses: KidS wIlL wAnT tO haVe this HoUuSE🤦♀️😤😤😤
I hate COPPA.
It's not our fault if we're creative and we make drawings/ sculptures
Funny but true
Ikr
Well, can you see where this is going????
UA-cam: KiDS LiKe YoUtUbE
FTC: BoOm YoUr DeMoNeTiZeD
Me in my room
Mom: clean your room!
Me: ok
Me : *throws coppa in trash and burns it*
Mom: perfect!
My floor: FINALLY
Everything can be child appealing it just depends on the kid :/
Women: Rewievs D*ldos
UA-cam: yep thats for kids
It's got bright colors! Obviously it's for kids
And its a TOY
Hey, I got a bright pink one that's called a "Unicorn Horn"... It's even sparkly. I'm pretty sure the Algorithm would call that child friendly content...I think this is just a bit too loosely worded to be Constitutional even.
There’s still children people
You're on the wrong video for that joke to fly.
It's not funny.
You know, there are a lot of fake animal rescues and animal abuse in UA-cam and they have nothing better to do, than concentrate on this 😂
Dear Government, there’s a difference between Family-Friendly content and Child-Aimed content
Even toy reviews (Great Big Toy Box) can be geared for adults (who are buying things) but are absolutely family friendly
yea srsly
Dope or nope is a family friendly channel but not child aimed
I mean its not just female creators, most channels are also in danger.
Yeah I don't know why she put Woman channels" it's all toy channel's
@@WestCoastGraffiti because she's a feminist
@@WestCoastGraffiti Not even that, gaming channels and channels that even are not directed to kids but kids still watch are in danger.
she's focusing mainly on craft channels because she herself is a craft channel, and many arts and crafts type hobbies are seen as being feminine
I remember this was going to happen to gaming too for UA-cam
PROTESTTT! WE NEED TO FIGHT FOR THE CRAFTERS, SLIMERS, SQUISHERS TOO!!!
Amen to that.
YEAH
AND TOY REVIEW CHANNEL
AND DOLL CUSTOMIZERS!!
AND GACHA CHANNELS
It IS actually UA-cam doing this because the FTC provides for a “general audience” option that would alleviate this whole shemozzle but UA-cam won’t allow it because they can’t make as much money off ads. Put the blame where it belongs which is squarely on UA-cam!
They should punish the people like Guava Juice and Logan Paul, they are exploring kids. Not amazing people like you!!
(Wow that’s a lotta likes thanks guys)
And don't forget Troom Troom, Five minute crafts and it's subchannels, and blossom etc etc
Usually, I hate grammer nazis , but what you mean is they are *exploiting* kids. If they were *exploring* kids, then they'd be pedophiles too. 😂
Couldn't agree more though.
Honestly, I agree, but it really isn't fair to punish a select few. It's either everyone get the punishment, or no one.
Agreed!
AMEN to that!
Man, this sucks UA-cam needs to get their crap straight
No kidding
Mhm!
Its not youtubes fault They just wanna make sure to follow ftc's law
How to be targeted for teens:
*use one swear word per video*
PG-13 movies are allowed one non-sexual use of the f word in the US :)
Yes but what about the younger kids I know she does not aim at kids but I know we have some young grains let's not ruin it for them :/
NyanGamer64 just be family friendly and don't post anything inappropriate. It's better
Save Marine Life have you watched the video? If you make family friendly content you get demonized or even fined. You. Can’t. Make. Family. Friendly. Content. Even though that’s what UA-cam has been pushing forever
Lmao
Thank you for doing this video. I am sharing with my friends and followers and have commented on the FTC page. Thank you for mentioning to be clear and concise, SUPER important for getting our message across. I recently my crafting channel and have just TODAY learned of what is about to go down. You are correct, together we can help the FTC fix the issue. We could simply need a "GENERAL" option instead of cut and dry (according to Ian - Social Media Lawyer) child directed or not. Thanks for making this video! Jo McEwen
**cracks knuckles** where's the petition?
So, Hentai is now going to be “Child-Appealing?”
Ofc, it's cartoons, what's wrong 😁😁😂
@@blackladd4 *HENTIA IS ANIME PORN NUMB SKULL*
@@edmundlabuguen They're joking, calm down-- r/wooosh much?
Ohhhh boyyyyy, Hartvigen is gonna have one hell of a time. Anime Man and Akidearest, good luck--
Children bouta be woke #hentai2020
Why are all these parents such Karens? There’s a KIDS app, MADE FOR THEIR KIDS, yet they’re complaining and the FTC is forcing creators to comply with THEIR rules all because some Karens want to let their kids to watch the regular UA-cam, where there is ADULT CONTENT.
That’s like taking your kids into a bar, complaining that there’s alcohol, then calling the cops.
edit: typos
Yeah it is probably the Karen's.
100% the karens.
🥺🥺🥺
@@T0x1cNeonz 👍
@@kaaayy7446 sorry I meant entitledparents and entitled people
It affects all of us, no matter content or gender at this point because the rules are so vague.
Oml watch the dang video 5:10
I just had my daughter in September and have started watching nursery videos from my account since I pay for UA-cam red so I don’t have to worry about ads on the videos. I’ll be insanely pissed if my account starts to be limited because I decided to let my daughter watch and listen to children’s videos.
I don’t make content anymore but might plan to in the future so if my account is deemed a child it could affect my future videos.
This whole situation is bullshit.