MIT Physics Demo -- Forces on a Current-Carrying Wire

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 сер 2008
  • Two flexible wires are suspended vertically. The wires are conected in series or parallel to a 12V storage battery. When the wires are connected in series and power is applied they will repel each other; when they are connected in parallel they weill attract one another.
    This effect is due to the magnetic fields created by the charge flowing through the wires. When the wires are in parallel, the currents in each are going in the same direction and thus attract. In series the cur
    ...More
    Two flexible wires are suspended vertically. The wires are conected in series or parallel to a 12V storage battery. When the wires are connected in series and power is applied they will repel each other; when they are connected in parallel they weill attract one another.
    This effect is due to the magnetic fields created by the charge flowing through the wires. When the wires are in parallel, the currents in each are going in the same direction and thus attract. In series the currents are going in opposite directions and repel.
    See original video on MIT TechTV - techtv.mit.edu/videos/813

КОМЕНТАРІ • 76

  • @ValpoPhysics
    @ValpoPhysics 8 років тому +152

    Series and Parallel aren't very useful descriptions here. The wires attract when the currents are flowing in the same direction. And they repel when the currents flow in opposite directions.

    • @jasonyeh3595
      @jasonyeh3595 8 років тому +4

      +Paul Nord i guess the video is simply describing the effect between set up and the wires not the electromagnetism principle underlying.......(although its supposed be taught in your way)

    • @theshayannn
      @theshayannn 5 років тому

      Thank u

    • @samjw1999
      @samjw1999 5 років тому

      Yeah, I thought that was a bit strange.

    • @priyanshgupta488
      @priyanshgupta488 4 роки тому

      You are right....

    • @arthursgarage6550
      @arthursgarage6550 3 роки тому

      @@kevinhu459 its always the small things we mess up

  • @parithimathi
    @parithimathi 3 роки тому +4

    Such a short and accurate video; superb

  • @shambukarijayanth7120
    @shambukarijayanth7120 3 роки тому

    very good,thanks.

  • @woo216
    @woo216 13 років тому +2

    sire the video is quite flabergasting yessss

  • @emma_tpn4323
    @emma_tpn4323 3 роки тому +4

    Too wild my bro

  • @hannahruslan1757
    @hannahruslan1757 11 років тому +2

    can you explain more detail about circuit connection for this demo. i want to try it.

  • @leviterande
    @leviterande 11 років тому

    that is well known magnetic forces, explain to me how I get "unidirectional forces from" cables and STRAIT conductors in a certain "fashion" if I have a current one way the arrangement moves in one direction, when the current is reversed the arrangment moves to a different direction. I think I have finally cracked unidirectional propulsion for good

  • @husainchhatariya6940
    @husainchhatariya6940 5 років тому +1

    Which material wite are you using and what is the resistance and length of the wire?

  • @muhdashif3565
    @muhdashif3565 Рік тому +1

    what type of wire suitable to use

  • @jdsweet3657
    @jdsweet3657 11 років тому

    Which way is lorentz force if a magnetic field and the direction of current are parallel in the same direction? I couldn't get right hand rule to cooperate.

  • @jonathasa4625
    @jonathasa4625 2 роки тому

    nice

  • @ali_youtube_vanced
    @ali_youtube_vanced 8 років тому

    what is the Ah of the battery ?

  • @Keerat09
    @Keerat09 29 днів тому

    Plz explain the connections

  • @maximilianprocopciuc6926
    @maximilianprocopciuc6926 5 місяців тому

    what are the threads made of wires??

  • @saabzee2958
    @saabzee2958 29 днів тому

    I need circuit diagram

  • @patipateeke
    @patipateeke 8 років тому

    which currents do you use?

  • @lynmurdalmans4568
    @lynmurdalmans4568 9 місяців тому +1

    Abi nakog nay nagstorya, waman diay

  • @stevenwhite139
    @stevenwhite139 11 років тому

    What does that tell you about gravity which is based upon the Lorentz Force???

  • @emredemir4627
    @emredemir4627 7 років тому +4

    Thanks, it will be more good if you put, mount an ampmeter for calculate to "How many power..."Ok, thanks... Was it 100 A?...

  • @matthewwenger5030
    @matthewwenger5030 8 років тому +6

    I am in the design phase of building this exact demo for my own science classroom. What gauge wire is that you used?

    • @TechTins_Projects
      @TechTins_Projects 7 років тому +1

      Try car battery jump lead wires as they are probably all you will need to emulate this experiment. Operate switch in short on off pulses of course!

  • @nishitgoyal911
    @nishitgoyal911 11 років тому

    which wire have u used?

  • @brianmenendez
    @brianmenendez 10 років тому +4

    strange, if you have two electrons stationary , they repel each other (static force), but if you take these same two electrons and shoot them down a parallel path, they then attract each other (two parallel line currents in same direction).
    if two static electrons are placed north and south on the earth, shouldn't the electrons attract each other since the are both travelling parallel due to the direction of the earth's rotation (parallel line currents) ?

    • @jasonyeh3595
      @jasonyeh3595 8 років тому

      +brian menendez i guess by referring to gieger-masten experiment the electrons should be crashing to the gold nuclei not repelling and deflect....if its in ur way of thinking

    • @jasonyeh3595
      @jasonyeh3595 8 років тому

      +Jason Rorschach *alpha-particles

    • @brianmenendez
      @brianmenendez 8 років тому

      Jason Rorschach in general, static repulsion force for two electrons if stationary, yet attractive force for two electrons if moving in parallel motion.
      haven't heard of gieger masten experiment, will look it up thanks

    • @jasonyeh3595
      @jasonyeh3595 8 років тому

      urm its just the experiment when rutherford's apprentice accidentally figure out the atomic structure is acturally hollow with a small dense positive charged nuclei.....or u may name it the alpha scattering experiment

    • @seanharrington9356
      @seanharrington9356 6 років тому +1

      For your hypothetical, the classical answer is that they're both stationary relative to the earth (in the same way that we don't "feel" like the earth is rotating). But that answer just leads to another question: if they're moving parallel through a wire at the same velocity, aren't they stationary relative to each other?
      The real answer comes from relativity. Einstein showed that magnetism (the effect that pulls the wires) is just another aspect of electricity (the force that pushes like charges apart), but it can only be understood this way using special relativity, and is not intuitive. Unfortunately I don't really understand this at a deeper level, so I can't answer any follow-up questions. But I hope this at least gives you another path to search.

  • @9026283147
    @9026283147 6 років тому

    What apparatus do we need for making this experiment

    • @cobrakingofeart
      @cobrakingofeart 6 років тому

      wires, a power source, and a 3 state switch

  • @ricomajestic
    @ricomajestic 14 років тому +2

    How much current do you have going through those cables and what type of cables are you using? What are the best specs for doing this demo?

    • @mohammedhassankorna
      @mohammedhassankorna 2 роки тому

      This does not matter because the magnetic field does not extend to infinity; it has limits where it ends and where its impact fades away. And if we spaced between the two wires for a distance, it will not happen repulsion and attraction between the two wires will pass the current naturally and we will not be able to see this experiment.

    • @aurelia8028
      @aurelia8028 Рік тому +1

      @@mohammedhassankorna Wrong. The magnetic field _does_ extend to infinity. In cylindrical coordinates; when you have a steady current I_0 flowing in the z-directions (like the current in the wire does), the moving charges will create a magnetic field that circles around the wire (in the θ-direction). The magnetic field is given as B(s)=I_0*μ0/(2π*s), where μ0 is the vacuum permeability and s is the radial distance from the wire.

  • @camilserapian7675
    @camilserapian7675 5 років тому

    Wow human nerves !

  • @RaghavKhullar
    @RaghavKhullar 8 років тому +1

    how to make such a switch as shown above ?

    • @enigmawn
      @enigmawn 6 років тому

      I can show you if you'd like to leave an e-mail address

    • @enigmawn
      @enigmawn 6 років тому

      It actually needs a double pole double throw switch

    • @cobrakingofeart
      @cobrakingofeart 6 років тому

      that 3 state switch (0,1,2) really threw my physics teacher for a loop when she tried to explain how it worked to the class as until this point we'd only ever discussed switches in a binary manner (on or off)

  • @calebkittle3955
    @calebkittle3955 10 років тому

    what is the current of this system?

    • @jasonyeh3595
      @jasonyeh3595 8 років тому

      +Caleb Kittle in this case could be both? because it is just the matter of connecting wires not the current flow. Just like the case when currents flowing down and up has no observable differences obtained in same experiment set up(am i right?)

  • @arthursgarage6550
    @arthursgarage6550 3 роки тому

    if we didn't know about the science behind this it would be wizardry

    • @aurelia8028
      @aurelia8028 Рік тому +1

      "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic"

  • @nomasdrugs2011
    @nomasdrugs2011 6 років тому +1

    Yo es que vengo aqui por JJ

  • @QuaziGNRLNose
    @QuaziGNRLNose 11 років тому +2

    there is no 'electric field' in the electrostatic sense, only a movement of electrons (current) through a wire made of an equal number of protons (thus the net static charge in our frame of reference is 0). The effect is purely magnetic. Magnetism however, is simply the effects of relativity making it so the moving electric charges are length contracted, and the 'magnetic field' is simply a name for the relativistic dilation of what would be called an 'electric field' in a electrostatics.

  • @chanakyasinha8046
    @chanakyasinha8046 5 років тому

    So thats the reason why temp rises with increase in current in a conductor, the charge flowing in the same direction feels the force for unification and during this event it produces more and more vibration due to which thermal energy rises, moreover, i think if we accelerate the charge (same) to close to the speed of light, the charge will be, wait what!! Is that the reason why the charge particle don't chase the speed of light, because it will become more and more heavy, it gain inertia and tries to lower the magnitude of charge 😭😭😭😭😭🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

  • @leviterande
    @leviterande 10 років тому

    I never understood why this is explained as Lorentz force.. that is not Lorentz force..as you can clearly see that the two fields are not PERPENDICULAR to each other to produce a third perpendicular force!

  • @arunraj3160
    @arunraj3160 12 років тому

    but there is an electric field also..so equal charges always repel each other...current means flow of electrons...so how is it possible?

    • @TechTins_Projects
      @TechTins_Projects 7 років тому +1

      No one really fully understands the reason. But its been observed and hence now used for all sorts of things by engineers etc. The observation that was first spotted was by people such as Micheal Faraday. What they did was took a wire and let charge flow through it, unexpectedly a magnetic field was seen to be produced around the wire all the while current was flowing through the wire. So when two wires are in close proximity (depending on direction of currents) they will either feel a magnetic repulsion or attraction. So your not alone in not understanding, no one does. It has a name electromagnetism and it is what has been called a fundamental law of nature, because it is not understood by anyone at a fundamental level. Lots of interesting theories but no one really knows the full story. Its one of natures most wonderful mysteries. And this experiment shows its effects in the simplest way possible.

    • @JACKRAIDEN97
      @JACKRAIDEN97 4 роки тому +1

      @@TechTins_Projects Wrong, it is understood easily. It is due to relativistic motion of electrons.

    • @PaulMarostica
      @PaulMarostica 4 роки тому

      @@TechTins_Projects Thanks for the most honest, best explanation yet.

  • @AmazingSlapToTheFace
    @AmazingSlapToTheFace 12 років тому +6

    Fucking magnets, how do they work!?

    • @TechTins_Projects
      @TechTins_Projects 7 років тому

      No one really knows. Hence they have described the electromagnetic force as a fundamental force of nature. In others words magnetism (strictly electromagnetism) is a fundamental force we don't fully understand but have measured. Lots of theories but no one knows exactly why it exists. But knowing that it does exist and its strength enables experimenters and engineers to utilize it.
      Basically magnetism is produced when ever charge is in motion. Even static magnets have electrons inside them that have what in "quantum theory" is described as spin and such spin is charge in motion. But "quantum theory" is just a theory, no one knows exactly what is happening at that level. The current idea is that magnetic force is really a relativistic effect and are essentially just side ways produced electric fields when charges are in motion.

    • @Project2025WILLRUINYOURLIFE
      @Project2025WILLRUINYOURLIFE 6 років тому

      good idea

    • @MB-st7be
      @MB-st7be 6 років тому

      I don't wanna hear from no scientist

  • @divvy1400yam600
    @divvy1400yam600 12 років тому

    Since I have never believed that mass attracts mass lol I am serious I wonder if electro magnetic effects could be the root cause of that for which gravity is held responsible.
    If the Moon can move water on the face of the Earth then I am a moonbeam.

  • @brettgeorge2987
    @brettgeorge2987 10 років тому +1

    I miss vectors.

    • @lulin2546
      @lulin2546 4 роки тому

      aww that's okay, vectors are still around. there no need to miss them, b

  • @Thisisnotmyrealname8
    @Thisisnotmyrealname8 13 років тому

    @TheMACcar Gravy IS magnetism. You don't know what you're talking about.

  • @timcr_live2543
    @timcr_live2543 3 роки тому

    Lol

  • @unpocolocoanimations2238
    @unpocolocoanimations2238 2 місяці тому

    Bro goes to MIT but doesn't know how to set up his mic so that it doesn't pick up only his air conditioning.

  • @fadykhalil7316
    @fadykhalil7316 Рік тому

    مين جاي من عند مستر حسن ماهر

  • @darylpinksen6708
    @darylpinksen6708 3 роки тому

    Calling both motions "Pull" isn't helpful. Which direction is "forward" and which "backward"? It isn't clear from the perspective of the viewer.
    Better to call away from the viewer "Push" and toward the viewer "Pull."