Blackwater MMT Model 50717

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @richardburns9772
    @richardburns9772 8 років тому +1

    So balanced and so beautiful

    • @369168
      @369168  8 років тому

      +Richard Burns "Balance" a great way to describe the dial/watch. Too many redos/reissues/reimaginings of vintage watches are ruined by the addition of a date window. Longines is an example of this. Virtually every time they release a homage to one of their great vintage watches they screw it up by adding a date window (which was not on the original). As an aside my MMT is one of my most accurate watches gaining less than 1 sec/day.

  • @johncarpenter3502
    @johncarpenter3502 9 років тому +2

    The originals had acrylic crystals and fixed lugs. The Type II had a solid back meaning the inner workings had to be accessed through the face of the watch. Not sure about the Type I. Thanks for sharing this. A supply officer buddy of mine when I was with SDVT-1 way back in 1993 looked these watches up for me as they were still in a supply catalog he had. The price the government paid for them back in the day was less than twenty bucks. You can find a beat up original today for $900-$1100 bucks.

    • @MikePetrucci
      @MikePetrucci 6 років тому

      Do you have any scans of those old supply catalogs?

  • @369168
    @369168  10 років тому +1

    the real Benrus Type I had a blank dial. thanks for watching

  • @petemcginnis
    @petemcginnis 3 роки тому

    I just picked up the new Benrus Type one on Hodinkee website. Hurry it's a limited run 1,000 pieces. I love it, only wished the bezel would have a clicking sound. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this watch, nice work it's greatly appreciated.

    • @369168
      @369168  3 роки тому

      I did look into this. The reason that I didn't go for it thus far is that the MMT looks too much like the Benrus so if I got the latter it would look like I have a duplicate watch (yes I know the Benrus IS Benrus)

  • @myvenusinuranus
    @myvenusinuranus 7 років тому

    I like how simple it is with no wording on the dial and the domed crystal

    • @369168
      @369168  7 років тому

      +1. thanks for watching !

    • @369168
      @369168  7 років тому

      yes, sometimes less is more :)

  • @kevinv1164
    @kevinv1164 4 роки тому

    hi do you still have the watch?

    • @369168
      @369168  4 роки тому

      Sure do

    • @kevinv1164
      @kevinv1164 4 роки тому

      @@369168 you want to part it?

  • @AardvarkAdventure
    @AardvarkAdventure 10 років тому

    It'd be "Mark Two," wouldn't it? (Mark Eleven would be "MK XI")

    • @369168
      @369168  10 років тому

      yikes! my bad. it is indeed "Mark two" and NOT "Mark Eleven"...thanks for pointing that out.

  • @beenyroy
    @beenyroy 8 років тому +2

    MKII (Mark Two) not MK11 (Mark Eleven)

    • @369168
      @369168  8 років тому +1

      +Beeny Roy thanks for correcting me on that. I do tend to get the "II" mixed up thinking it's either a "two" or an "eleven"

    • @beenyroy
      @beenyroy 8 років тому

      Great in depth and honest review too btw

    • @369168
      @369168  8 років тому

      thanks so much!

  • @ItsTimePictures
    @ItsTimePictures 10 років тому

    It's decent looking but homage watches with a blank dial are really boring. Kind of like a car before it's painted and detailed. These dials need their own identity to shine.

    • @dickvancalsteren2539
      @dickvancalsteren2539 6 років тому

      Matt Stevens not to mention those white triangles, so booooooooring...