Why We Still Don't Have Electric Planes

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
  • As air travel becomes more harmful to the environment, companies are betting on battery power as a cleaner alternative to jet fuel. Prototypes of electric aircraft have been taking off around the globe, paving the way for a future of cheaper flights, quieter airports, and emissions-free air travel.
    MORE AIRPLANE CONTENT:
    Why You Can't Open An Airplane Door Mid-Flight
    • Why You Can't Open An ...
    How To Survive A Plane Crash
    • How To Survive A Plane...
    Why Planes Dump Jet Fuel
    • Why Planes Dump Jet Fuel
    ------------------------------------------------------
    #Electric #Planes #TechInsider
    Tech Insider tells you all you need to know about tech: gadgets, how-to's, gaming, science, digital culture, and more.

    Visit us at: www.businessin...
    TI on Facebook: / techinsider
    TI on Instagram: / tech_insider
    TI on Twitter: / techinsider
    TI on Amazon Prime: read.bi/PrimeVideo
    INSIDER on Snapchat: insder.co/2KJLtVo
    ------------------------------------------------------
    Why We Still Don't Have Electric Planes

КОМЕНТАРІ • 5 тис.

  • @Bamwich
    @Bamwich 4 роки тому +18583

    "because they're heavy" i just saved you 9 minutes.

    • @brianhajj
      @brianhajj 4 роки тому +585

      Bamwich saved my time thank you

    • @Israelball
      @Israelball 4 роки тому +97

      Bamwich hahahhahhaahhahah

    • @yurig5081
      @yurig5081 4 роки тому +200

      Thank you, i already knew this just wondered if they had other points, but i guess thats literally the only limiting factor.

    • @Bamwich
      @Bamwich 4 роки тому +48

      Yuri G it’s kinda the only thing that matters when it comes to planes.

    • @billeaea5954
      @billeaea5954 4 роки тому +8

      Bamwich thx

  • @chettpamplona1179
    @chettpamplona1179 4 роки тому +5852

    Imagine being on a plane and hear the captain saying that the battery is low

    • @mobsherhasssn5174
      @mobsherhasssn5174 4 роки тому +909

      Easy. Passengers have pedals that can charge it. Lol.

    • @jeksenricaprio7832
      @jeksenricaprio7832 4 роки тому +99

      @@mobsherhasssn5174 lmao

    • @thekrieger2959
      @thekrieger2959 4 роки тому +393

      @@mobsherhasssn5174 hey wait a minute that could work

    • @bkumar2386
      @bkumar2386 4 роки тому +232

      Use my power bank 😂

    • @z-trip5457
      @z-trip5457 4 роки тому +302

      @@mobsherhasssn5174 That's for economy class lol.

  • @badmeme6801
    @badmeme6801 4 роки тому +2396

    Title: "Why we still don't have electric planes"
    First 15 seconds of the video: "electric planes have been around since the 1970s"

    • @kentclark6420
      @kentclark6420 4 роки тому +83

      They probably mean viably commercial electric planes.

    • @raw5866
      @raw5866 4 роки тому +22

      Bart Bell • Yeah, but it’s still kind of ironic.

    • @Radioactive_Bunny.
      @Radioactive_Bunny. 4 роки тому +1

      Bart Bell wooooosh

    • @TheGuyThatsNotFunny
      @TheGuyThatsNotFunny 4 роки тому +21

      @@Radioactive_Bunny. how is this a woooosh moment

    • @natlus6805
      @natlus6805 4 роки тому +20

      @@Radioactive_Bunny. keanu big chungus wholesome 100 moment

  • @georgethomas3597
    @georgethomas3597 3 роки тому +713

    Are we gonna look over the fact that inventor of lithium ion battery is named John B.Goodenough.

    • @harrymu148
      @harrymu148 3 роки тому +44

      that's prolly why they do explode sometimes lmao jkjk

    • @flashdancer42
      @flashdancer42 3 роки тому +10

      Hahaha I was looking for that comment. What a name!

    • @easygoing2479
      @easygoing2479 2 роки тому +3

      It's a *RARE* day that I actually learn something from UA-cam. Thank you, George!

    • @user-pn3im5sm7k
      @user-pn3im5sm7k 2 роки тому +8

      It was actually invented by Akira Yoshino in 1985, John B. Goodenough and Stanley Wittingham only contributed by research from the 70s, which then, wasn't enough to make a Lithium-ion battery prototype from and required more research. Hence why they never made one.

    • @georgethomas3597
      @georgethomas3597 2 роки тому +5

      @@user-pn3im5sm7k sad that all inventions have to have someone not getting the credit they deserve.

  • @bdeemter1234
    @bdeemter1234 4 роки тому +3702

    Let me save you some time, battery energy density isn’t there yet. Too heavy for how much energy you get out of the batteries.

    • @jaimehernandez4962
      @jaimehernandez4962 4 роки тому +130

      also, it will never reach speed like jet engine can make as well. it will take longer than usually. air travel time will be longer.

    • @olayinkaanifowose5099
      @olayinkaanifowose5099 4 роки тому +21

      Brandon Deemter thank you

    • @seontonppa
      @seontonppa 4 роки тому +85

      @@jaimehernandez4962 Never? Do you have any idea how fast the tech of batteries, engines etc are developing?

    • @Hhhh22222-w
      @Hhhh22222-w 4 роки тому +46

      @@jaimehernandez4962 it will, that's just the nature of technology

    • @tahaimrankhan
      @tahaimrankhan 4 роки тому +9

      Just use solid state batteries
      They are new and invented by japan

  • @aiwa5008
    @aiwa5008 4 роки тому +1753

    Elon musk after watching this video
    HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

    • @danielguy851
      @danielguy851 4 роки тому +32

      aiwa500 please Elon were counting on you !

    • @entity9957
      @entity9957 4 роки тому +50

      He said in a interview that we currently don't need electric planes what we need is electric cars

    • @sunnygogna5097
      @sunnygogna5097 4 роки тому +9

      Yep my thoughts exactly.

    • @mockingspongebob773
      @mockingspongebob773 4 роки тому +25

      he also said in an interview that tesla electric plane is feasible, but it requires a change in battery density, tesla is already working on "million mile battery" in Fremont factory, I expect tesla plane in 10 years max

    • @aerithofmyore
      @aerithofmyore 4 роки тому +2

      @@mockingspongebob773 more funding for tesla!

  • @LEEGOOVER9901
    @LEEGOOVER9901 4 роки тому +1511

    4:46 why is it so wrong looking at the truck........

  • @bobhoye5951
    @bobhoye5951 2 роки тому +101

    The problem with batteries has to do with the density of energy that can be stored.
    Even the most modern batteries are heavy but carry little energy relative to gasoline or jet fuel tanks.

    • @nafnaf0
      @nafnaf0 2 роки тому +1

      Yep, battery energy density is poor compared to jet fuel. Also the efficiency of airplanes is already fairly high, so there is not a lot of gains to be made

    • @nazeronallen
      @nazeronallen 2 роки тому

      They have the technology it’s just that they need people poor😂

    • @Bretaxy
      @Bretaxy 2 роки тому

      I think we should switch over to fossil fuels, would save a heck ton of money.

    • @alucar.3338
      @alucar.3338 2 роки тому

      I agree with u BUT, everything that those plans need to be completed do exist in 2022, THE BIGGEST PROBLEM IS THAT:
      EVERY other airline, investors, companies, politicians, and all the others, Philthy Rich people in the world won't allow it to happen or come to life. Bcuz all of them will be losing money big time, so they will fight down the battery idea, make sure every news station an reporter continuously talk about it and convince the public that it's a threat to human life.
      NIKOLA TESLA TOWER for example:
      It was created an proven fully functional, he just needed the funding witch he didn't receive BCUZ the tower was capable of sending direct current to your home with a special isolated antenna. And it would of been free to the world. A week after he demonstration to the government he died, the government went straight to his home and took every single piece of information even his pocketbook and pocket watch that his wife had for him.
      UP TO THIS DAY the tower was never found or talked about. We have the technology, understanding and components to create futuristic Technologies BŰT, the money hunger people of every country won't allow us to fully evaluate bcuz most of the minerals and other materials won't be needed anymore and that's bad for their business.

    • @electric7487
      @electric7487 Рік тому

      Not only that, but one of the most important aspects of commercial aircraft is that they burn off significant amounts of their weight as they fly, as the fuel being used up means that the airplane gets more efficient as it flies. This would be completely lacking in an electric plane.

  • @alikhamis3367
    @alikhamis3367 4 роки тому +3360

    *even though electric planes have exist for years they haven't really taken off*
    Ha funi joke ;)

  • @Marco-hl6gz
    @Marco-hl6gz 4 роки тому +824

    0:00 what could a future with electric planes look like? $25 tickets...
    Laughs in Europe

    • @josepha72513
      @josepha72513 4 роки тому +56

      Marco Poletti Laughs in Ryanair

    • @livethefuture2492
      @livethefuture2492 4 роки тому

      @@josepha72513
      laughs in 737 MAX

    • @craggywag5482
      @craggywag5482 4 роки тому +1

      Marco Poletti what? I don’t get it

    • @build2270
      @build2270 4 роки тому +37

      @@craggywag5482 So, in Europe, it costs way less than in the states, Asia, Africa or middle east, thats because in Europe theres alot of countries, and most of those countries has ALOT of money, thats why it doesnt cost much for a average citizen to fly around in Europe, one of my friends took a flight from Norway to England for 3 dollars, and that wasnt even on RyanAir, so flying in Europe is not expensive at all

    • @craggywag5482
      @craggywag5482 4 роки тому +8

      Christoffer Stenslie thanks, Jesus Christ that’s cheap

  • @zyon4531
    @zyon4531 4 роки тому +530

    Me: *forgets to charge my phone* i can go without it i guess
    Me: *forgets to charge my plane* FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-

    • @somthingarageMD
      @somthingarageMD 4 роки тому +13

      just use it as a glider then

    • @DaddyM7MD
      @DaddyM7MD 4 роки тому

      Fack!

    • @x23esports22
      @x23esports22 4 роки тому +1

      @@somthingarageMD wtf bruh? A gLider is far more different and lighter than a massive ass plane with more massive batteries👺

    • @kwsmetna
      @kwsmetna 4 роки тому +6

      @@x23esports22 that's the joke

    • @kwsmetna
      @kwsmetna 4 роки тому

      @@woaa8117 well shit now I feel like I'm the dumbass

  • @kevinlm5073
    @kevinlm5073 3 роки тому +36

    00:15 "they haven't really taken off".
    00:17 "what is keeping them 'grounded'.
    That is two puns in a row and they didn't even mention it.

  • @davidscheibelreiter3580
    @davidscheibelreiter3580 4 роки тому +3054

    "Companies have to prove every inch of their aircraft is safe."
    Not if it's Boeing

    • @kimjunguny
      @kimjunguny 4 роки тому +104

      I mean the plane was safe. They did speed up the training process though, and thats why people died. Basically since the pilots had limited experience with the plane they didn't know how to fix the problem that killed them. Boeing is very safe.

    • @davidscheibelreiter3580
      @davidscheibelreiter3580 4 роки тому +47

      @@kimjunguny And the FOD in the Fuel Tanks were found because they are so safe?😂

    • @play005517
      @play005517 4 роки тому +14

      If it's a completely new plane, sure you need to prove every inch. Boeing tried too hard to make their new plane not that new, so the approval process failed.

    • @A10810
      @A10810 4 роки тому +71

      I feel like everyone in this comment section doesn’t know what they’re talking about

    • @PeterAuto1
      @PeterAuto1 4 роки тому

      Are you talking about the one software error that affect Planes running for too long.

  • @sujiewansuj3788
    @sujiewansuj3788 4 роки тому +620

    Planes: dont bring large batteries onboard
    Electric planes: WE GOT A GIANT BATTERY BRUH

    • @ethanwestfall7421
      @ethanwestfall7421 4 роки тому +19

      The pLaNe IS thE BaTteRy BrUh

    • @sexycow98
      @sexycow98 4 роки тому +7

      All commercial aircraft have more than one huge battery on board.

    • @TheeLogicGamer
      @TheeLogicGamer 4 роки тому +3

      I get where you're coming from, but the difference is that an aircraft like any vehicle is serviced regularly, and have multiple sensors, backup systems and circuitry that can disconnect power or give early warning in case an error is detected, this is not the case with passenger items.
      In-fact you can fly large batteries with the correct paperwork, and its easier to do so if the battery is new, tested, and low in charge. Just hard to regulate for commercial flights.

    • @CasvGl
      @CasvGl 4 роки тому

      or you just drain the batteries of the phones of the passengers.

    • @omegaRST
      @omegaRST 4 роки тому

      @@CasvGl Im pretty sure that would grant you about half a second of extra flight time

  • @brunoglopes
    @brunoglopes 4 роки тому +353

    “John B. Goodenough” what a name.

    • @gevorgantonyan8417
      @gevorgantonyan8417 4 роки тому +15

      He is Goodenough tho, you can’t lie😂

    • @ebubechioti7410
      @ebubechioti7410 3 роки тому +10

      He is a legend. Responsible for so many modern material developments.

    • @mateomisain8283
      @mateomisain8283 3 роки тому +7

      Search him on youtube you won't regret it! He's a literal legend, invented so many modern everyday technology and is still working at 98 years old with his team!! I have huge respect for that man and a lot of people don't even know about him

    • @tigerdoug9789
      @tigerdoug9789 3 роки тому +1

      Lol 😂

    • @tooley877
      @tooley877 3 роки тому +1

      John Be Good enough

  • @minedphreak8487
    @minedphreak8487 2 роки тому +38

    2020 "We used a glider to reduce risk and harm to anyone while testing".
    1960 "We taped a seat onto the front of this rocket there is also a cupholder for your whiskey near the ashtray"
    We've come a long way in aviation.

    • @fladave99
      @fladave99 2 роки тому

      Electric vehicles are ABONDONED tech from the 1800s that has not changed a WHIT, being sold to FREAKING IDIOTS to raise taxes and make the stockholders RICH while selling JUNK

  • @N0pe_G
    @N0pe_G 4 роки тому +972

    6:01 Guy: we are very confident testing the plane in flight early 2020. Corona: oh hell nah you won't

    • @THEMATT222
      @THEMATT222 4 роки тому +3

      lol

    • @bro6046
      @bro6046 4 роки тому +1

      Haha

    • @ketsu9670
      @ketsu9670 4 роки тому +6

      Actually this is better
      Corona: oh yes count me in!

    • @LeBaldJames23-
      @LeBaldJames23- 4 роки тому

      I wont go on it till one of them crashes then they will fix it

    • @jebise1126
      @jebise1126 4 роки тому +5

      testing isnt problematic they are probably testing right now

  • @tonyhollerz6958
    @tonyhollerz6958 4 роки тому +478

    4:46 aircraft engineers take note of this pickup... that’s what you call weight reduction.

    • @rhysgittoes6544
      @rhysgittoes6544 4 роки тому +2

      nutella1204 4:46****

    • @tonyhollerz6958
      @tonyhollerz6958 4 роки тому

      Rhys Gittoes thanks man😂😂😂

    • @tousifzaman9392
      @tousifzaman9392 4 роки тому +1

      Actually it has its weight shifted :P those are modified for towing planes. They have a big hook in front attached.

    • @PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      @PabloGonzalez-hv3td 4 роки тому +1

      It's more of an optical illusion. It's just reconfigured for maneuverability

    • @ichbrauchmehrkaffee5785
      @ichbrauchmehrkaffee5785 4 роки тому +1

      This pickup truck was designed by aircraft engineers for weight reduction.
      CHANGE MY MIND

  • @georgesbv1
    @georgesbv1 3 роки тому +84

    A smaller problem that I see for bigger aircrafts would be that while regular planes to the descent lighter by many tones of fuel, an electric plane would have the exactly same weight as at takeoff.

    • @albradley5527
      @albradley5527 2 роки тому +8

      Yes and batteries weigh a whole lot more than fuel.

    • @seconddaymusic8393
      @seconddaymusic8393 2 роки тому +7

      Being heavier on decent isn't an issue, it's taking off that's the issue. This is why in-air refueling is a thing, we can take off with a lighter fuel load and then fill up in the air so we have enough fuel to reach the destination.

    • @gamersnoob2378
      @gamersnoob2378 2 роки тому

      @@seconddaymusic8393 that’s what us did while leaving from the taliban country

    • @seconddaymusic8393
      @seconddaymusic8393 2 роки тому

      @@gamersnoob2378 im aware, im an aircraft maintainer for the squadron that was in charge of making that airlift happen.

    • @aintfromrounhere8099
      @aintfromrounhere8099 2 роки тому

      @Straight white unvaccinated male how would he know

  • @gamernatemoore8029
    @gamernatemoore8029 4 роки тому +414

    Real challenge: how many times can you make the same take off joke

    • @mattia7277
      @mattia7277 4 роки тому

      Gamernate Moore sooo annoying

    • @TacitSwine750
      @TacitSwine750 3 роки тому +6

      I'm surprised to see that this comment hasn't taken off yet.

    • @tommurphy4307
      @tommurphy4307 2 роки тому

      you mean where the plane taxis on a long cord and at takeoff the cord comes out of the plug? i love that!

  • @fruitpunchsamurai8
    @fruitpunchsamurai8 4 роки тому +1474

    Waiting for elon to come out with a badass electric plane

    • @JoshBenBernales
      @JoshBenBernales 4 роки тому +11

      Check out Beta Tech, making moves 👍🏻

    • @TheChrisaige
      @TheChrisaige 4 роки тому +59

      I dont think we will see big commerical airliners using batteries ever. Hydrogen is the way to go

    • @Chopper153
      @Chopper153 4 роки тому +31

      Even battery EVs are not the future. Hydrogen is the true future. With abundant solar, wind and nuclear energy, we can generate electricity to separate hydrogen from water. That same hydrogen is oxidised in fuel cells to move cars and planes. Finally we'll a get a perfect cycle.

    • @TheChrisaige
      @TheChrisaige 4 роки тому +21

      @@Chopper153 also hydrogen can be used by fusion reactors.
      I dont think that personal hydrogen cars can compete with ev. EV's are better and easier for everyday people. Big stuff like trains, busses, airlines and military should use hydrogen

    • @deejbop264
      @deejbop264 4 роки тому +1

      Factx

  • @jonathanbowen3640
    @jonathanbowen3640 4 роки тому +495

    4:46 WHAT IS THAT? Where is its back?

    • @papalouie5517
      @papalouie5517 4 роки тому +1

      Lol

    • @ijakubamadej
      @ijakubamadej 4 роки тому +22

      I looked at it for a good 5 minutes and still couldn't figure it out

    • @wtfstudioinc.1827
      @wtfstudioinc.1827 4 роки тому +33

      Jonathan Bowen it is half to conserve energy and to reduce weight.

    • @suwwan1965
      @suwwan1965 4 роки тому +4

      Where are the wings??

    • @tousifzaman9392
      @tousifzaman9392 4 роки тому +13

      @@ijakubamadej Those are modified for towing planes. They have a big hook in front attached.

  • @karottinoide4111
    @karottinoide4111 2 роки тому +7

    Solution for the battery problem: just use Hydrogen engines or Hydrogen based fuel cells.

    • @lewismitchell3751
      @lewismitchell3751 2 роки тому

      or keep developing the batter to get more efficient and safer, it is possible, we went from the old batteries to the new ones, look at phones 3X as thick cus of the battery and lasted 1/2 the time now our phones are so daym thin but last 12+ hours

    • @karottinoide4111
      @karottinoide4111 2 роки тому

      I think that Hydrogen is the combustion fuel of the future. It is true that battery Tecnology will improve greatly, but Hydrogen is already avadable and is not far away from convencional combustion fuels.

  • @tobene
    @tobene 4 роки тому +352

    "25$ tickets"
    Laughs in european

    • @Artyomthewalrus
      @Artyomthewalrus 4 роки тому +19

      To be fair, europe is tiny. Thus travel is cheaper.

    • @littleorange3514
      @littleorange3514 4 роки тому +2

      In singapore a flight to malaysia cost u 500 dollars in econmy

    • @reezlaw
      @reezlaw 4 роки тому +38

      @@Artyomthewalrus
      USA land area: 9.1 million km²
      Europe land area: 10.2 million km²

    • @Artyomthewalrus
      @Artyomthewalrus 4 роки тому +5

      @@@reezlaw
      Canada 9.98million km2
      The same size as canada, slightly bigger than america. And a population twice that of both countries combined. Flying between two neighboring countries is usually less than two neighboring states. Flying from the capital of manitoba to the capital of ontario, two neighboring provinces is the same as flying from the capital of france to the capital of romania, which have 3 countries in between them. The only continent smaller than europe is australia, which has one country.

    • @reezlaw
      @reezlaw 4 роки тому +19

      @@Artyomthewalrus First of all, I wasn't talking about Canada. But even if I was, who cares about the capital of this or that. You said Europe is tiny, it isn't. How many nations you cross to fly from Paris to Bucharest is utterly irrelevant.

  • @devedee2393
    @devedee2393 4 роки тому +392

    4:46
    what in the living world is this car

    • @taukedabai4613
      @taukedabai4613 4 роки тому +34

      yeah, caught my eye too

    • @heimskr2881
      @heimskr2881 4 роки тому +23

      Its used to move the plane, you can see the platform attached on the front of it which most defenitely has wheels on the other side. Even then it looks so strange from that angle

    • @sidneyhemphill4383
      @sidneyhemphill4383 4 роки тому +16

      We're doing 2 wheeled cars now? 🤣

    • @Rwyiii
      @Rwyiii 4 роки тому +7

      Cursed just Cursed

    • @Eagle10021
      @Eagle10021 4 роки тому +4

      The likes are at 69. Nice.

  • @viopix6911
    @viopix6911 4 роки тому +411

    The plane made from scratch looks clean

    • @viopix6911
      @viopix6911 4 роки тому +7

      @@rashleonard4069 damn

    • @ahmadbrkam4350
      @ahmadbrkam4350 4 роки тому +9

      Yeah it looks
      Smoky
      Hot

    • @finno3677
      @finno3677 4 роки тому +1

      Nobody really knows what the fire started.. the Company Said it might have been caused by ground equipment.. we should wait for the investigation

    • @UltimateAlgorithm
      @UltimateAlgorithm 4 роки тому

      @@rashleonard4069 wow, could be charging issues. Like most smartphones battery failure.

  • @magneteesa
    @magneteesa 4 роки тому +37

    These guys: this is so hard
    Elon musk: hold my tesla dealership

  • @justaguy6216
    @justaguy6216 4 роки тому +235

    Imagine having hundreds of little electric airplanes flying around for the short trips. It'll be a ATC nightmare.

    • @aminboumerdassi2334
      @aminboumerdassi2334 4 роки тому +12

      By that time they'll have probably figured out how to completely automate ATC.

    • @justaguy6216
      @justaguy6216 4 роки тому +5

      @@aminboumerdassi2334 That'll be a huge engineering challenge.

    • @ProfessorHobo
      @ProfessorHobo 2 роки тому +1

      Certifying that many uber pilots would be impossible. I bet uber is looking at an autopilot option for their service. If all of the short trip planes are automated it would be no problem cause the machines would just talk to each other. There would have to be a universal autopilot language created though.

    • @nishikun867
      @nishikun867 2 роки тому +3

      @@ProfessorHobo and someone hacks into the system and deletes all the important instruction set just for fun

  • @navorski7660
    @navorski7660 4 роки тому +182

    4:46 That truck looks so ridiculous lmao 😂😂😂

    • @vanessapaz8631
      @vanessapaz8631 4 роки тому +10

      Glad you noticed how is it driving?

    • @Chazahc18
      @Chazahc18 4 роки тому +3

      Vanessa Paz its in reverse lol

    • @XxMUKALIENxX
      @XxMUKALIENxX 4 роки тому +11

      @@Chazahc18 she means it only has two wheels how is it driving. Now answering to that, I would assume the weight of the metal in the front weighs it down to be able to be a two wheeler

    • @stforksandadream1985
      @stforksandadream1985 4 роки тому +4

      Hahahhahah

    • @goodcitizen477
      @goodcitizen477 4 роки тому +8

      It did look weird. I had to roll the video back a few seconds to get another look. Glad I wasn't the only one who saw it.

  • @B10KPlaysGames
    @B10KPlaysGames 4 роки тому +263

    Title: *"Why We Still Don't Have Electric Planes"*
    RC Plane Pilots: *_Am i a joke to you?_*

    • @bruhdude963
      @bruhdude963 4 роки тому +1

      RC planes can't lift people...

    • @B10KPlaysGames
      @B10KPlaysGames 4 роки тому +16

      @@bruhdude963 they're still electric planes

    • @danielrehn81
      @danielrehn81 4 роки тому +3

      Yes, yes you are a joke 😉

    • @B10KPlaysGames
      @B10KPlaysGames 4 роки тому

      @notlikeu lol

    • @awwtergirl7040
      @awwtergirl7040 4 роки тому +1

      Yes but they don't scale up to heavy lifting long distance people carriers. Even large RC craft are better off with gas and not lipo.

  • @Thebossquad
    @Thebossquad 3 роки тому +32

    As someone who is an aerospace engineer I can tell you these planes are farther off then you think

    • @paulanthony5274
      @paulanthony5274 2 роки тому +1

      Humour my ignorant arse and tell me how far we are off nuclear powered travel ? You probably don't know but ah well lol

    • @Someone-zx7xd
      @Someone-zx7xd 2 роки тому

      @@paulanthony5274 In my opinion it cannot be done through fission as it produces nuclear waste which is harmful for the environment. Jet engines can be powered through nuclear fission but since it is harmful for the environment, it is not done. As for fusion, no technology has been invented to utilize the energy from nuclear fusion. Some rockets with nuclear fission as their source of energy have already been developed since nuclear waste in space is not harmful. But those rockets utilize some other safer energy sources when inside the atmosphere and those fission powered engines are activated only after it is far enough from the earth.

    • @ekinteko
      @ekinteko 2 роки тому +2

      Exactly.
      If people want to have Renewable and Environmentally-Safe Air travel the solution is Hydrogen. Use solar panels to split sea water into pure Oxygen, Hydrogen, and Excess. Transport the Hydrogen Fuel with electric cars. Use modern-hybrid engine, so that the aircraft will have H2O emission, and a decent range. Sure it is weaker than a standard engine, and less efficient than battery, but the upside is that it works and is appropriate tool for this task.
      It may not be appropriate for all types of aircraft, like the super-large planes and military applications... but it can certainly replace the majority (80%) of planes out there and make a significant reduction to our emissions and reduce our reliance on a non-renewable fuel source.
      And yes, I know how ironic it sounds to recommend Hydrogen when we saw what happened with the Hindenburg Disaster.

    • @alpha-cf2oi
      @alpha-cf2oi 2 роки тому

      only 16y old tesla fanboys would think this is anywhere close lol

    • @kieron88ward
      @kieron88ward 2 роки тому

      @@ekinteko We (the company I work for) are currently working on electric aircraft and hydrogen engines in parallel.

  • @jebise1126
    @jebise1126 4 роки тому +404

    6:58 yes! "we are using the wrong tools for the job" fast trains for shorter trips not electric planes. (at least in areas with very high concentration of people)

    • @frank_av8tor
      @frank_av8tor 4 роки тому +2

      Right, just like in California 😱😂🤣

    • @mister_grizzlee5105
      @mister_grizzlee5105 4 роки тому +39

      @@frank_av8tor well, don't know about USA, but trains are still better for short and medium inter-city travel,and even for longer distances ffs. Just look at Japan, China and Europe.

    • @jebise1126
      @jebise1126 4 роки тому +14

      @Entrepreneur ynhbg hyper loop is hyper shit. doesnt work never will be bye and have fun

    • @jonathantan2469
      @jonathantan2469 4 роки тому +1

      This becomes a problem if you're travelling from London to Copenhagen or Amsterdam... where there is a large body of water in between

    • @jebise1126
      @jebise1126 4 роки тому +6

      @@jonathantan2469 well there is already tunnel under chanel there but yes of course over seas train is a bit less useful but there are still huge masses of population that are not separated by sea.

  • @RizLazey
    @RizLazey 4 роки тому +89

    4:46 "I DONT NEED SLEEP, I NEED ANSWERS!!"

    • @goldenwolf3723
      @goldenwolf3723 4 роки тому +2

      I believe it’s because center of mass is more in the front

    • @CuriousEarthlings
      @CuriousEarthlings 4 роки тому +2

      That the real technological breakthrough

    • @eboubaker3722
      @eboubaker3722 4 роки тому +4

      I think that the other 2 wheels are in the front of that metal bar. the wheels you see are actually the rear wheels of this utility car.

  • @AnchorGaurav
    @AnchorGaurav 4 роки тому +222

    1:45
    My first thought: Is she drunk?

    • @ooupatek1760
      @ooupatek1760 4 роки тому +7

      She actin toasted 😭

    • @MathewZ788
      @MathewZ788 4 роки тому +2

      Me too bud 😂

    • @thefirstsin
      @thefirstsin 4 роки тому +2

      Lmao🤣

    • @iokuawa4446
      @iokuawa4446 4 роки тому +5

      probably italian

    • @milanstevic8424
      @milanstevic8424 4 роки тому +6

      @@iokuawa4446 she's Colombian by birth, but living in Florida. took me 3 and a half seconds of research.

  • @slavicprincess
    @slavicprincess 2 роки тому +5

    For long haul and even medium haul, electric planes are decades away. It will take a major scientific discovery to improve batteries.

    • @doctorbee6673
      @doctorbee6673 2 роки тому

      naw I dont think so. Think about it this way, from the time the Wright brothers first took powered flight, to the time we landed on the moon was only 60 years. 60 years to go from flightless to leaving the planet. Tech moves exponentially, and its only getting faster. Im young and Ive been able to watch tech change and advance at breakneck pace.

  • @davidgagnon2665
    @davidgagnon2665 4 роки тому +256

    So no one is talking about the fact that eviation's prototype has caught fire.

    • @bryanlallen
      @bryanlallen 4 роки тому +19

      The Eviation Alice has always been “aspirational” but otherwise unrealistic. I’m sure their foreign investors are re-thinking their investment, and anticipate that Alice will never fly, at least in its present form with wingtip power plants.

    • @fliteshare
      @fliteshare 4 роки тому +5

      @@bryanlallen Agree, that aircraft won't make it past the V1 cut test procedures, without an unrecoverable Vmc roll.

    • @Razor-gx2dq
      @Razor-gx2dq 4 роки тому

      Did not know that.

    • @ichbrauchmehrkaffee5785
      @ichbrauchmehrkaffee5785 4 роки тому +2

      Hahaha, just like the Liliumjet, another electrical aircraft, I really hope we find a propper alternative for those fuckin' batteries

    • @Sir_Budginton
      @Sir_Budginton 4 роки тому +5

      ​@@bryanlallen Why did they even bother with wing tip engines? A two engine plane must be able to fly to certain parameters with one engine out, and having the engines on the wingtips means there will be a huge yawing force if an engine goes. So to counter this you need a massive vertical stabaliser, which is going to be heavy.
      Though interestingly, having the engines on the wingtips actually does make the wing structure lighter.

  • @captainjackpugh6050
    @captainjackpugh6050 4 роки тому +66

    “Hey tony I have an idea for an electric jet”. Elon Musk on Iron Man 2

    • @bvbxiong5791
      @bvbxiong5791 4 роки тому +12

      seriously tho, Elon need to get on this project too. if anyone can make electric planes a reality sooner rather than later, it's Elon Musk.

    • @sherajr
      @sherajr 4 роки тому +1

      Tesla planes!

    • @kirra9152
      @kirra9152 4 роки тому

      Electric planes is already a realty. Elon musk might take it to commercial level. Might.

  • @sahil_afk
    @sahil_afk 4 роки тому +220

    4:46 I’m so confused by the truck

    • @beans3808
      @beans3808 4 роки тому +1

      Sahil Tiwari same

    • @tousifzaman9392
      @tousifzaman9392 4 роки тому +7

      @@beans3808 Those are modified for towing planes. They have a big hook in front attached.

    • @beans3808
      @beans3808 4 роки тому

      Tousif Zaman thank you so much, i don’t know why i was so confused, but i really wanted to know

    • @tousifzaman9392
      @tousifzaman9392 4 роки тому +1

      @@beans3808 haha its fine, it is confusing at first look lol! Bigger airports who serves big planes has dedicated tow vehicles. But for kitty aircrafts those mods are enough.

    • @fbyi2940
      @fbyi2940 4 роки тому +3

      The half of the truck is trapped in the diffrent dimension

  • @klixx7847
    @klixx7847 3 роки тому +2

    4:47 does anyone want to explain what that car is ?!
    👁👄👁

  • @terrenceklaverweide6356
    @terrenceklaverweide6356 4 роки тому +93

    Tech insider: The future; 25 dollar tickets
    Ryanair: Am I a joke to you?

    • @diegoyuiop
      @diegoyuiop 3 роки тому +1

      @Yazan Al-Saif but it says flying regional has become expensive even in Europe

    • @solidzack
      @solidzack 2 роки тому

      I've seen 9€ flights by RyanAir, took an 18€ flight from germany to spain myself.
      The train to the airport costs more than the flight itself. Low budget airlines are insane

  • @centauria9122
    @centauria9122 4 роки тому +94

    Now I'm just gonna wait until we could invent an electric rocket...

    • @IntelTV
      @IntelTV 4 роки тому +6

      stop
      shut up.

    • @centauria9122
      @centauria9122 4 роки тому +27

      @@IntelTV That wasn't very "Intel"ligent of you.

    • @IntelTV
      @IntelTV 4 роки тому

      @@centauria9122 How so?

    • @tamriel4243
      @tamriel4243 4 роки тому

      Actually there is a electric jet engine in theory. Look it up.

    • @lukebalderose334
      @lukebalderose334 4 роки тому

      Its not to far fetched. Look up project Breakthrough Star Shot

  • @OllieIbb
    @OllieIbb 4 роки тому +89

    "Tests early 2020" I guess thats not possible right now

    • @zonde2941
      @zonde2941 4 роки тому

      😂😂

    • @JohanEinevik
      @JohanEinevik 4 роки тому +9

      Perfect time now when there is no competition for the airspace.

    • @zonde2941
      @zonde2941 4 роки тому +2

      @@JohanEinevik there are still flying lots of planes

    • @user-nameplease7163
      @user-nameplease7163 4 роки тому

      That’s the point

    • @ryanzapalac7455
      @ryanzapalac7455 4 роки тому

      Toaster actually the eviation test plane that was here in the USA specifically in Prescott Arizona burned to the ground a few months back. The ground power unit it was hooked up to caught fire and then caught the plane on fire too. I drive by their building everyday and haven’t seen anything from them in months

  • @Siggrim
    @Siggrim 2 роки тому +1

    Yeah the uber project for home pickup will never happen....imagine how loud a drone is compared to its size

  • @CityWhisperer
    @CityWhisperer 4 роки тому +124

    As far as I'm concerned, certification is not an issue, specially in the US. I mean, just ask Boeing.

    • @balanced3826
      @balanced3826 4 роки тому +13

      Shots fired!

    • @cakraparindra4659
      @cakraparindra4659 4 роки тому +2

      Burnt the right way..

    • @mp4f
      @mp4f 4 роки тому +7

      Dispatch, we’ve got a active shooter situation, we need backup

    • @kimjunguny
      @kimjunguny 4 роки тому +6

      I mean the plane was safe. They did speed up the training process though, and thats why people died. Basically since the pilots had limited experience with the plane they didn't know how to fix the problem that killed them. Boeing is very safe.

    • @CityWhisperer
      @CityWhisperer 4 роки тому +4

      @@kimjunguny Bruh, Boeing sold that plane saying it was just another variant of the 737 family, that it could be flown by any pilot that already knew how to fly a 737 with little formation. Doing that put the lives of many in risk, and it cost 346 people their life. Now I don't know upto what point pilots know how their Boeing plane flies and if they actually know all the systems that are onboard.

  • @snowleopard9463
    @snowleopard9463 4 роки тому +85

    Elon be like:
    - Electric cars
    - Electric planes
    - Electric rockets
    - Electric Earth
    - Electric Mars
    Oh I get it now. Elon starts with E and Electric starts with E

    • @averagejoe6031
      @averagejoe6031 4 роки тому +4

      Electric rockets...yeah that ones almost never gonna happen. Elon even said it himself

    • @gregorymalchuk272
      @gregorymalchuk272 4 роки тому

      @@averagejoe6031
      Ion engines and VASIMR already exist or are on the drawing board. But they are not going to be used to get off earth to get to orbit.

    • @Rutherford_Sam
      @Rutherford_Sam 3 роки тому +1

      @@gregorymalchuk272 Ion engine is very weak , it's only going to be used on satellite for course correction.

    • @justarandomweeb3220
      @justarandomweeb3220 3 роки тому

      @@Rutherford_Sam i hate your name lol

    • @constellation-sj8xn
      @constellation-sj8xn 3 роки тому

      *E*

  • @oliverfalla18
    @oliverfalla18 4 роки тому +212

    I like how they didn't mention lobbies that are indefinitely making this a war of attrition

    • @kellynolen498
      @kellynolen498 4 роки тому +13

      Ohhh my i forgot about politics thats not going to be easy to overcome

    • @nightz5808
      @nightz5808 4 роки тому +7

      BOOOOOO POLITICS BOOOOOO

    • @MrVsingh786
      @MrVsingh786 4 роки тому

      Largest all electric plane !!
      onwaymechanic.in/2020/05/30/worlds-largest-all-electric-plane-takes-a-revolutionary-flight-over-washington-e-caravan-magnix-aero-tech/

    • @tannercox4537
      @tannercox4537 4 роки тому +7

      No only thing that holds this back is batteries being heavy af and no where close to efficient as combustion. It takes more natural gas to power a battery half the power as a combustion engine. Battery powered cars and big battery objects are worst for the environment than combustion. We need new energy sources but it’s clear you know nothing about energy and are just listening to democrats that lie more than republicans when it comes to energy.

    • @threeforthsstudios
      @threeforthsstudios 2 роки тому +1

      @@tannercox4537 Solar Power fixes the natural gas problem.

  • @EMETRL
    @EMETRL 2 роки тому +2

    immediately after this video came out, the world went into lockdown and the aviation industry shut down. that timing is catastrophic

  • @marcosmedia7463
    @marcosmedia7463 4 роки тому +172

    Elon Musk: Why not rocket travel? It's faster and cheaper.

    • @lilmcnoggy1439
      @lilmcnoggy1439 4 роки тому +5

      R u sure its cheap?

    • @iwilldielater4894
      @iwilldielater4894 4 роки тому +14

      @@lilmcnoggy1439 to elon musk ofc, its a joke

    • @lilmcnoggy1439
      @lilmcnoggy1439 4 роки тому +2

      @@iwilldielater4894 oh...
      Ok i get it XD

    • @AYUSH-pq9ld
      @AYUSH-pq9ld 3 роки тому +3

      "Once in a Lifetime Experience"

    • @jelo1360
      @jelo1360 3 роки тому +3

      Flying from LA to NYC in dead 10 seconds 😂 😂

  • @adikuyand
    @adikuyand 4 роки тому +20

    0:42 Lazy parents naming their child:
    Dad: How about John?
    Mom: That's Goodenough
    The Kid: John Goodenough
    XD

    • @michaelesposito2629
      @michaelesposito2629 4 роки тому +1

      They gave their child a new last name huh?

    • @nebulai9587
      @nebulai9587 4 роки тому

      @@michaelesposito2629 He's just different

  • @colesanders526
    @colesanders526 4 роки тому +6

    Batteries are FAAR more efficient than gasoline. They just have a lower energy density

  • @MdJunayed
    @MdJunayed 3 роки тому +4

    Anyone here after Supercar Blondie's electric plane video? :D

  • @aariaMB
    @aariaMB 4 роки тому +31

    "Will be testing the plane in flight in early 2020" covid-19: "YEET"

  • @heisenburger3426
    @heisenburger3426 4 роки тому +47

    If you want to reduce carbon emissions, then invest in something that has already proven to be perfectly efficient in almost the whole world except the US: Electric High speed rail

    • @steffanmevel6599
      @steffanmevel6599 4 роки тому

      Or hyperloop!

    • @stephenmaniloff8493
      @stephenmaniloff8493 4 роки тому

      Wrong See... China...Not enough riders

    • @Youtubeuser1aa
      @Youtubeuser1aa 4 роки тому

      It takes me 5 hours from LAX to BWI.
      How long is train?

    • @は私です彼の名前
      @は私です彼の名前 4 роки тому +4

      Stephen Maniloff Because their economy is a farce and no one can AFFORD to ride them.

    • @kentclark6420
      @kentclark6420 4 роки тому

      The gas industry shut down many rail systems that weren't using gas or diesel. We used to have electric trains.

  • @CoastalBreed
    @CoastalBreed 4 роки тому +15

    4:46 lets talk about that truck 😂

    • @iamdavism4163
      @iamdavism4163 4 роки тому +2

      The Truck is on a Wheelchair 😂😂😂

  • @patman0250
    @patman0250 2 роки тому +2

    Why we don't have electric planes, simply put the battery tech isn't quite there yet. In order for us to be as successful in electric planes as we are in electric cars. There would need to be another revolutionary advancement in battery science. It would need to be as monumental as the lithium ion was.

  • @flaskwater44
    @flaskwater44 4 роки тому +56

    It's simple: Hit the plane with lightning to recharge it, duh.

    • @Adrenaline_chaser
      @Adrenaline_chaser 4 роки тому +2

      Clever!! 😂 😂. Why didn't i think about it? Here's a like 👍🏼 to you!

    • @mp4f
      @mp4f 4 роки тому +5

      Jose Guevarra big brain

    • @deluxe5565
      @deluxe5565 4 роки тому

      Big PP

    • @Hurricane800
      @Hurricane800 4 роки тому +4

      *Want a scholarship?*

    • @childs4sale336
      @childs4sale336 4 роки тому +1

      Wait thats....genius

  • @FullTekAuto
    @FullTekAuto 4 роки тому +70

    Jet fuel engine: I’ll never be retired..
    Electric engine: At least I can dream
    Anti Matter Engine: Yes

    • @FullTekAuto
      @FullTekAuto 4 роки тому +1

      Although it’s looking like electric multi ion thrusters are the future

    • @killman369547
      @killman369547 4 роки тому +2

      I would not want to be *anywhere* near an anti-matter engine. If the magnetic confinement fails or air gets in for any reason it'll explode like a hydrogen bomb.

    • @Hrodryc
      @Hrodryc 4 роки тому

      @@killman369547 assuming that at these point of technology we probably could control matter, so the prevention of generating huge explosions due to malfunction of the engine may be a security check for the companies before launching it to the market, just crazy ideas

    • @fouadtahio
      @fouadtahio 4 роки тому +1

      If you look at tesla cars now, they both conserve weight and produce significantly greater power than petrol (tesla roadster). If you take this info on a larger scale i think Elon has the knowledge and ability to produce an all electric aircraft which produces a significant amount of power normal aircrafts while conserving weight. Maybe start with an hybrid?

  • @optimumtechhd3290
    @optimumtechhd3290 4 роки тому +86

    The solar cell converts sunlight into electricity, ... or as AeroVironment likes to say, the plane is powered by it's shadow.

    • @yxcvbnmmnbvcxy544
      @yxcvbnmmnbvcxy544 4 роки тому +2

      "powered by it's shadow" wow that sounds deep

    • @francestod.tandocjr4092
      @francestod.tandocjr4092 3 роки тому +1

      Solars panels cap around 40% efficiency. Not enough to power a plane.

    • @tommurphy4307
      @tommurphy4307 2 роки тому

      @@francestod.tandocjr4092 he knew that- it was a swipe at aerovironment- haha

  • @IMaximusDMI
    @IMaximusDMI 3 роки тому +4

    Does the saving $800 per flight hour take into account that the plane only seats 9? So instead of 2 pilots carrying 100 people, you are going to need 22 pilots and 11 planes to carry the same amount of people. And having that many planes landing and taking off I'm sure is going to cause tons of problems for runway traffic.

  • @jeshie3736
    @jeshie3736 4 роки тому +16

    4:46 had to rewind to make sure I saw that truck correctly

  • @StanVanGundy1
    @StanVanGundy1 4 роки тому +18

    Narrator: They still haven’t taken off
    Me : Aha see what you did there

  • @jamesliston5693
    @jamesliston5693 4 роки тому +90

    4:45 Did anyone notice something missing

  • @SpinosaurusStudios_
    @SpinosaurusStudios_ 2 роки тому +1

    How to get around heavy batteries:
    1. Use solar panel.
    2. Make it the primary income of energy.
    3. Use a single double A battery as power storage.
    4. Profit.

  • @napalm_vietcong_2109
    @napalm_vietcong_2109 4 роки тому +17

    “What’s keeping them grounded”
    Me: well, WiFi, and power to keep inside the house because of the coronavirus.

  • @athuljeev4951
    @athuljeev4951 4 роки тому +75

    "Electric vehicles are the future" says everyone for so long , that nobody even cares about Electric vehicles

    • @bakhtiarsaleem5060
      @bakhtiarsaleem5060 4 роки тому +1

      No doubt 👌

    • @tdg9281
      @tdg9281 4 роки тому +11

      I mean it is, I care and also like 4 million people have bought one

    • @meredithwhite272
      @meredithwhite272 4 роки тому +10

      Maybe if the money we were spending subsidizing fossil fuels and building weapons was used to develop and build more efficient green technology it wouldn't take so long. Follow the money. If there is a will there is a way.

    • @meredithwhite272
      @meredithwhite272 4 роки тому

      @01bletsch but we also subsidize fossil fuels.

    • @terencetaylor993
      @terencetaylor993 4 роки тому +1

      I had to think about this - supposing on board charging using hydrogen was a part of this it would be ressisted, not only by energy producers but governments as well (loss of tax?)

  • @MegaAchraf11
    @MegaAchraf11 4 роки тому +10

    Everyone else: CORONAVIRUS
    Tech insider: Why don’t we have electric planes?

  • @benpolishchuk8147
    @benpolishchuk8147 3 роки тому +6

    People: We cant solve the problem with electric planes
    Elon Musk: AM I A JOKE TO YOU?!?

  • @germanrudecindo3382
    @germanrudecindo3382 4 роки тому +22

    This video: Why We Still Don't Have Electric Planes?
    Elon Musk: still I don't want one.

    • @cplpetergriffin1583
      @cplpetergriffin1583 4 роки тому +2

      Elon’s been talking about electric planes for awhile now. But he only hypes shit up not deliver results

    • @germanrudecindo3382
      @germanrudecindo3382 4 роки тому

      @@cplpetergriffin1583 he said on an interview that still there are some things that need improvement to make a affordable electric airplane, things such as battey etc.

    • @jebise1126
      @jebise1126 4 роки тому +1

      wile other companies actually make flying planes...

    • @germanrudecindo3382
      @germanrudecindo3382 4 роки тому

      @@jebise1126 show me a good one sir.

  • @TonyEmil
    @TonyEmil 4 роки тому +37

    @4:47 is this a half car or I’m tripping?

    • @tousifzaman9392
      @tousifzaman9392 4 роки тому

      Nah u fine, its just moded

    • @CaneSugarCane
      @CaneSugarCane 4 роки тому

      @@tousifzaman9392 how???

    • @tousifzaman9392
      @tousifzaman9392 4 роки тому +1

      @@CaneSugarCane It has a big weight attached in front of it to tow aircrafts. Google with company name, you'll see more pics

    • @CaneSugarCane
      @CaneSugarCane 4 роки тому

      @@tousifzaman9392 thanks! You there mvp!

  • @bassagent97
    @bassagent97 4 роки тому +9

    "Who has the many billions it will take to bring a product like this (more efficient battery) to market in 15 years time."
    *-Elon Musk heavy breathing*

    • @tommurphy4307
      @tommurphy4307 2 роки тому

      I was gonna say 'VW', but their insurance is going to be too expensive.

  • @jelo1360
    @jelo1360 3 роки тому +1

    Even tho there is a lot of things that could go wrong with electric planes, I’m thinking that we could probably add solar panels to the wings of an electrical plane then you can let it charge a battery. 🤷🏾

  • @ItsJamMan
    @ItsJamMan 4 роки тому +9

    Summary: Slow, Hard to manufacture, Hard to maintain, and too heavy

  • @JSMEsq
    @JSMEsq 4 роки тому +11

    Who ever said batteries? Hydrogen fuel cells is the way we need to steer ourselves

    • @aagoglia2
      @aagoglia2 4 роки тому +1

      Yeah. I read a fuelcell drone was able to last 331 minutes un interrupted. That is like 5 and a half hours. Much better performance than a battery and you can refuel it fast. Although that is a drone and not a plane.

    • @killman369547
      @killman369547 4 роки тому +1

      And where do we get the hydrogen? We have 2 options, electrolysis or hydrocarbon cracking which is essentially decomposing oil to get the hydrogen atoms bound up in the hydrocarbon chains. Either way you have to input a lot of energy to get the hydrogen which is counterproductive.

    • @JSMEsq
      @JSMEsq 4 роки тому

      @@killman369547 it also takes a lot of energy to mine up the lithium for battery’s, and to extract oil, so relatively I don’t think electrolysis will significantly more time consuming

    • @ChucksSEADnDEAD
      @ChucksSEADnDEAD 4 роки тому

      Imma keep it 100 with you chief, I'm not flying with a pressurized hydrogen container on board.

    • @JSMEsq
      @JSMEsq 4 роки тому

      @@ChucksSEADnDEAD batteries catch on fire a lot two, a electric car crashed and caught fire for three days

  • @LoopCraftYT
    @LoopCraftYT 4 роки тому +38

    Nobody:
    Me: *Tesla Cyberplane*

  • @darrellbedford4857
    @darrellbedford4857 3 роки тому +3

    That's nice, but do people really know how much damage to the environment the manufacture of LI-PO batteries cause. That includes mining of all the elements required to make the batteries and the energy used to make them. There is enough oil to last eons.Oil production is less harmful to the planet and the caused pollution can be controlled. Also the most obvious question is, where is the electricity used to charge the batteries produced? Most likely from Nuclear, oil or coal using generating stations. Even the Wind generators(Non-recyclable at end of use) or solar panels( again Non-recyclable at end of use). And alternatives to oil seem to be more harmful to the planet than keeping with oil and coal.see attached website
    www.nsenergybusiness.com/features/lithium-ion-battery-environmental-impact/

  • @Deprotination
    @Deprotination 4 роки тому +33

    The prototype for the eviation electric plane exploded at my airport while I was working there and released a cloud of toxic gas. I'm not anti electric and this did actually happen. I think it's an issue that needs to be addressed.

    • @finno3677
      @finno3677 4 роки тому +6

      It caught fire, it didn’t explode. And they assume that ground equipment caused the fire.
      Stop spreading false rumors.

    • @shapshooter7769
      @shapshooter7769 2 роки тому

      Fuel fires are one thing, lithium fires are another

    • @tommurphy4307
      @tommurphy4307 2 роки тому

      @@shapshooter7769 i'm sure that damn ship with all the electric cars is still on fire- they should probably figure out where the hell that thing is and do something about it- like wipe out VW plants worldwide....

    • @tommurphy4307
      @tommurphy4307 2 роки тому

      eviation- the act of drilling for fine drinking water in france

  • @tonyg2554
    @tonyg2554 4 роки тому +11

    "But they just haven't taken off" ... nnnggh!?

  • @xgamergamer7282
    @xgamergamer7282 4 роки тому +53

    4:45 wtf was that ?!🤔

  • @willwang9789
    @willwang9789 2 роки тому +4

    Usually in an emergency and if the plane is overloaded normal planes will dump out extra fuel, what are you gonna do with an electric areophane? Dump out the batteries?

    • @ammarmuawia3679
      @ammarmuawia3679 2 роки тому

      There's prolly gon be reduction of the electricity where they can adjust the volts of it travelling thru

    • @STEVEDIGIBOYtv
      @STEVEDIGIBOYtv 2 роки тому

      Ya ejecting highly flamable litium batts would could cause fires. They will adopt nuclear heat exchange power, it was in works in 1950's with GE. See Car life 1954 July edition.

  • @oh0stv
    @oh0stv 4 роки тому +7

    Tech Insider: Form ppl without knowledge in technology, for ppl without knowledge in technology...

  • @soumitratewari483
    @soumitratewari483 4 роки тому +7

    What about Hydrogen Fuel Cel Technology ? Can you guys please make a video on that .... Thank you. ✌️✌️✌️

  • @JohnSmith-kj2od
    @JohnSmith-kj2od 4 роки тому +17

    "Oops I forgot the charger at home"

    • @HughDarkwave
      @HughDarkwave 4 роки тому

      Graphene is the answer

    • @jelo1360
      @jelo1360 3 роки тому

      “Shoot, I forgot to add the backup engine...”

  • @WlerickBigotOfficial
    @WlerickBigotOfficial 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks to Tesla, Internal combustion engines will completely disappear around 2040.
    On roads before 2030, on water before 2040, and in the air before 2050.
    500wh/kg first and then 1000/kg batteries will help to achieve that and close the fossil fuel era.

  • @Charlie1821
    @Charlie1821 4 роки тому +7

    Lol let’s ignore how horrible for the earth mining all the rare earth minerals required for batteries are.

    • @flamingarsenal7897
      @flamingarsenal7897 4 роки тому

      Charlie1821 reusable tho

    • @vertie2090
      @vertie2090 4 роки тому

      @@flamingarsenal7897 horrible tho

    • @flamingarsenal7897
      @flamingarsenal7897 4 роки тому +1

      Vertie not really would u rather use gas or coal that will run out soon and cause way more pollution and destroy the ozone layer environment and kill humans and animals or would u rather use materials that can be reused for years which only harms a small part of the environment? U got to pick one

    • @Charlie1821
      @Charlie1821 4 роки тому +2

      @@flamingarsenal7897 Most of the electricity used to power batteries comes from fossil fuels. Modern nuclear power would be the best solution but ill-informed environmentalists won't let that happen either.

    • @a.banana
      @a.banana 4 роки тому

      @@Charlie1821
      Or we can work on creating batteries from renewable energy, such as Tesla is working towards.

  • @abdulazizalserhani7625
    @abdulazizalserhani7625 4 роки тому +6

    2:13 that computer on the left is from the 90s not from the 80s an 80s computer would have no CD-ROM drive, having floppy drives and a non-curved case, Is it true?

  • @ozzyfromspace
    @ozzyfromspace 4 роки тому +12

    4:46 Truck rendering at 56% 🤭
    *screams in confusion*

    • @robospider99
      @robospider99 4 роки тому

      That's an actual vehicle

    • @yohannesbalcha2245
      @yohannesbalcha2245 4 роки тому

      @@robospider99 what's it called. It's defying physics

    • @oxyo3531
      @oxyo3531 4 роки тому +1

      the wheels are on the front of the metal thing

  • @florianiscrown
    @florianiscrown 2 роки тому +1

    Because when battery dead fly straight down. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
    You know this BS of CO2 is just rubbish. We need CO2 for life. The trees like CO2 and give us OXYGEN. Simple ain't it? 🤡🤡🤡

  • @arjunsaharawat5912
    @arjunsaharawat5912 4 роки тому +9

    Remember from Iron Man 2, Tony Stark and Elon Musk are working on a electric plane😂😂

    • @icancook5898
      @icancook5898 4 роки тому +1

      Yea i remember that 😂 that was a cool cameo.

  • @addnan6494
    @addnan6494 4 роки тому +15

    A max range of 500-600 miles really means they will be flying significantly less than that for redundancy

  • @memeteam4497
    @memeteam4497 4 роки тому +7

    0:41 some say John didn’t do well as an inventor, although most say John b good enough

  • @icekk007
    @icekk007 2 роки тому +1

    This video has not addressed the infrastructure issue. Where and how to charge these electric planes. To be commercially viable, the planes would not be charged quickly. You can't afford to wait half a day to charge, and fly one to two hours.

  • @pkramer962
    @pkramer962 4 роки тому +7

    Goodenough, that's an interesting name for an inventor.

  • @ktlnz8444
    @ktlnz8444 4 роки тому +32

    “This would be a problem for the next ahhh-undred years.”
    ***Twitching intensifies***

  • @therealspeedwagon1451
    @therealspeedwagon1451 4 роки тому +4

    I’d rather have a hydrogen powered plane than an electric one as hydrogen is better for the environment than even electric is as batteries need rare earth metals which are rare and cause harm to the environment when mining for them
    Unless we start mining asteroids than we’re not gonna be using electric planes on the regular without causing harm to the planet

  • @crazyjigneshvines
    @crazyjigneshvines 2 роки тому +1

    Conclusion:- Batteries are heavy.!
    I just saved your 9 minutes.😊😜
    Thanks me later😜😜

  • @리주민
    @리주민 4 роки тому +8

    Why not just leave plugged in to a huge extension cord? Can fly back and forth. Just try not to tangle the cords with other planes.

    • @FMHikari
      @FMHikari 4 роки тому

      The weight of such cord would destabilize the whole thing the further it goes

    • @djninja2425
      @djninja2425 3 роки тому +1

      @@FMHikari im pretty sure they were making a joke

    • @kingsly1031
      @kingsly1031 2 роки тому

      It'll be a wired plane

  • @The-NSA
    @The-NSA 4 роки тому +4

    I'm sorry ma'am, we've already reached maximum bad pun capacity on this flight.

  • @zEternus
    @zEternus 4 роки тому +15

    I wouldn't trust a bloody energizer to take me over the Atlantic.

  • @pranavasonnathi8052
    @pranavasonnathi8052 2 роки тому +1

    I got an idea why can u put light weigh power full solar pannel on outer covering of plane
    Idea no 2- the machine which is in starting of plane and rotating i dont know that name when it is rotating u can do it as wind power like that in that only so energy will conseverd and when it is rotating we can conserve energy not with wind power method with another eg in some advance cars when we drive we will get electricity like that when it is rotating we can use same method , we can do plane 24/7. I think thank u. Give any idea if u know or modification

  • @Nonamelol.
    @Nonamelol. 4 роки тому +5

    Sometimes I feel like I was born too early 😢